Re: dec29th netinst broken
Joey Hess wrote: Harald Dunkel wrote: The new netinst iso of today gave me Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours. Still the same problem. Regards Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Promise FastTrack Support?
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 12:42:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Nowicki Christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-25 10:18]: I've tried to install Debian GNU/Linux sarge on an server with a Promise FastTrack Raid Card (Model : FastTrak TX2000) : Is this common RAID array controller supported by the new debian-installer ? Can you please post the output of lspci and lspci -n. Of course : 2 ttypts/1 [Tue Dec 30 10:45:23] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/client 0lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2570 (rev 02) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 2572 (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d2 (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d4 (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d7 (rev 02) 00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24de (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24dd (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset PCI (rev c2) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d0 (rev 02) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24db (rev 02) 00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d1 (rev 02) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d3 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 24d5 (rev 02) 01:06.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139 (rev 10) 01:07.0 RAID bus controller: Promise Technology, Inc.: Unknown device 6269 (rev 02) 01:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 1050 (rev 02) It's a shuttle box : http://www.materiel.net/details_SB62G2.html 3 ttypts/1 [Tue Dec 30 10:45:29] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/client 0lspci -n 00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:2570 (rev 02) 00:02.0 Class 0300: 8086:2572 (rev 02) 00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02) 00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02) 00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02) 00:1d.3 Class 0c03: 8086:24de (rev 02) 00:1d.7 Class 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev 02) 00:1e.0 Class 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2) 00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:24d0 (rev 02) 00:1f.1 Class 0101: 8086:24db (rev 02) 00:1f.2 Class 0101: 8086:24d1 (rev 02) 00:1f.3 Class 0c05: 8086:24d3 (rev 02) 00:1f.5 Class 0401: 8086:24d5 (rev 02) 01:06.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) 01:07.0 Class 0104: 105a:6269 (rev 02) 01:08.0 Class 0200: 8086:1050 (rev 02) Interesting thinks from /var/log/dmesg : Linux version 2.4.22-1-686 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.2 20030908 (Debian prerelease)) #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 ... Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00beta4-2.4 ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx ide: late registration of driver. ICH5: IDE controller at PCI slot 00:1f.1 ICH5: chipset revision 2 ICH5: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide0: BM-DMA at 0xf000-0xf007, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:DMA ide1: BM-DMA at 0xf008-0xf00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio ICH5-SATA: IDE controller at PCI slot 00:1f.2 ICH5-SATA: chipset revision 2 ICH5-SATA: 100% native mode on irq 18 ide2: BM-DMA at 0xd400-0xd407, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:DMA ide3: BM-DMA at 0xd408-0xd40f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio PDC20271: IDE controller at PCI slot 01:07.0 PDC20271: chipset revision 2 PDC20271: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide4: BM-DMA at 0xa400-0xa407, BIOS settings: hdi:pio, hdj:pio ide5: BM-DMA at 0xa408-0xa40f, BIOS settings: hdk:pio, hdl:pio hdb: PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-106D, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive hdi: Maxtor 6Y120P0, ATA DISK drive blk: queue e0028910, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0x) hdk: Maxtor 6Y120P0, ATA DISK drive blk: queue e0028d64, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0x) ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide4 at 0x9400-0x9407,0x9802 on irq 19 ide5 at 0x9c00-0x9c07,0xa002 on irq 19 hdi: attached ide-disk driver. hdi: 240121728 sectors (122942 MB) w/7936KiB Cache, CHS=238216/16/63, UDMA(133) hdk: attached ide-disk driver. hdk: 240121728 sectors (122942 MB) w/7936KiB Cache, CHS=238216/16/63, UDMA(133) Partition check: /dev/ide/host4/bus0/target0/lun0: [PTBL] [14946/255/63] p1 p2 p5 p6 p7 p8 /dev/ide/host4/bus1/target0/lun0: [PTBL] [14946/255/63] p1 p2 p5 p6 p7 p8 Highpoint HPT370 Softwareraid driver for linux version 0.02 ataraid/d0: p1 p2 p5 p6 p7 p8 Drive 0 is 117246 Mb (56 / 0) Drive 1 is 117246 Mb (57 / 0) Raid1 array consists of 2 drives. Promise Fasttrak(tm) Softwareraid driver for linux version 0.03beta ... It'a standard debian kernel package : kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686. During the install process I saw /dev/ide/host4/bus0/target0/lun0 and /dev/ide/host4/bus1/target0/lun0 but not /dev/ataraid/d0 :( I've setup a RAID 1 array with two hard drives. But during the installation process I didn't see my ATA RAID array. I saw my two hard drives. But those hard drives are connected to the Promise controller? Yep of course :) I made a cross install with debootstrap from a knoppix live cd :( This installation was not user friendly :( I
Re: ports status update
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 08:27:45PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote: Hello, * Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-27 16:21]: | powerpc: Very shakey | - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine | and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a | debian admin or a kindly offer from someone with a powerpc | box. | - Autobuilding ok. | - Kernels are in a state of transition. | - CD images are broken due to daily build issue. | May soon switch them over to use the autobuilt images. | - No recent install reports, and dunno if it'll work. I'm currently create initial images. And I can create the images for the beta cdrom too. But my iBook isn't online all the time, so daily images are impossible for me on this machine. I can build daily-images. Probably after january 4 though. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration
Package: netcfg Tags: d-i Severity: wishlist Am Sam, den 27.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 10:46: - Forwarded message from Thorsten Sauter [EMAIL PROTECTED] - * Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-26 12:33]: | * Gaudenz Steinlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-20 11:10]: | It found my wired ethernet controller, but not my Airport card. | As soon as there is a kernel module for the ariport card on the | installer image, we can test if this solves the problem or if we have to | add something more to support airport. | | The airport driver is included in | nic-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.20_powerpc.udeb now. Joe, can you try | a new daily build in a few days? if we have support for aiport (and maybe other wifi cards), doesn't a wlancfg udeb make sense? This package should basicly ask for the following options and then configure the wirless card based on these answers _before_ any network configuration is done. - network - station/nick name - encryption key If we include such a package, then we need an udeb from the wireless-tools package also. Bye Thorsten - End forwarded message - - Forwarded message from Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#221533: install fails - couldn't download exim4 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:13:27 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Thorsten Sauter wrote: if we have support for aiport (and maybe other wifi cards), doesn't a wlancfg udeb make sense? This package should basicly ask for the following options and then configure the wirless card based on these answers _before_ any network configuration is done. - network - station/nick name - encryption key If we include such a package, then we need an udeb from the wireless-tools package also. I looked at it a week ago, and concluded that to be a robust wifi configurator, it would need to be part of netcfg. Here is my rough design document: - wifi config should happen after netcfg has chosen an interface, but before the dhcp - in low priority, should let wifi be configured - in high priority, should see if there is an AP, and if so, use it with no config - should allow configuration of: ad-hoc or AP WEP key entry (ugh) ad-hoc channel, essid for AP, get a list of access points (how? at least dummy code with AP and signal) prompt with a question that asks which AP to use, with a manual entry at the bottom to let the user enter the essid; after the manual entry, see if an AP was found using that essid, else show an error and back to list - if dhcp or whatever fails, should be the option to go back and reconfigure wifi, in case that was the problem Instead of making there be 3 choices (retry dhcp, config static, reconfig wifi), how about changing netcfg/dhcp_retry to jump back to the start of netcfg (interface choice). This way, if you choose the wrong interface, you can also rectify that, and you get to configure wifi again too. Always jumping back to the start would require changing the current design of the dhcp retry code. If the dhcp client did not exit it is currently not killed and restarted but we wait for another 10s instead. If we go back to the start we would have to kill the dhcp client to avoid unwanted side effects. If we agree on using udhcp on all archs this would not be too serious, because udhcp only runs for about 7s and is restarted on retry anyway. I'm not sure if this behaviour of udhcp works with real world slow dhcp servers though. - after network config is done, need to write wifi info to interfaces file Can this be made standalone, or how does it integrate with netcfg? Probably the latter. I submitted this email as a wishlist bug to netcfg. Gaudenz -- see shy jo - End forwarded message - -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: step forward
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Detecting hardware... Loading modules... Detected module '[Unknown]' for 'Unknown MATSHITACD-RW CW-8121' Detected modules 'sungem' for 'Apple Computer Inc. Uninorth GMAC' Trying to load module 'sungem' Could not load driver 'sungem' for 'Apple Computer Inc. Uninorth GMAC' Detected module 'ide-scsi' for 'Linux IDE-SCSI emulation layer' Trying to load module 'ide-scsi' Detected module 'usb-storage' for 'USB storage' Trying to load module 'usb-storage' then it keeps going: floppy, ide-detect, ide-floppy, ide-disk, ide-cd, isofs. then is says: 'Missing modules 'sungem, usb-storage' This must be the problem. 2.4.22-3 says : kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc (2.4.22-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Replaced GMAC driver by the SUNGMEM one. So, instead of having GMAC builtin, SUNGEM (there is a typo in the changelog) is also builtin, and not modular. Ideally the powerpc-small should replace the powerpc config in some future, and we should have more modular stuff, but until then, it would be nice that whatever is in charge of loading modules doesn't die when the stuff is builtin. This has come up before too. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: step forward
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Detecting hardware... [...] then is says: 'Missing modules 'sungem, usb-storage' This must be the problem. 2.4.22-3 says : kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc (2.4.22-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Replaced GMAC driver by the SUNGMEM one. So, instead of having GMAC builtin, SUNGEM (there is a typo in the changelog) is also builtin, and not modular. Ideally the powerpc-small should replace the powerpc config in some future, and we should have more modular stuff, but until then, it would be nice that whatever is in charge of loading modules doesn't die when the stuff is builtin. This has come up before too. I checked this, when looking at the kernel init log. There wasn't eth0 detected, so probably it wasn't even builtin. Mmm, probably you are using an older kernel then. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: step forward
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:45, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Detecting hardware... [...] Ideally the powerpc-small should replace the powerpc config in some future, and we should have more modular stuff, but until then, it would be nice that whatever is in charge of loading modules doesn't die when the stuff is builtin. This has come up before too. I checked this, when looking at the kernel init log. There wasn't eth0 detected, so probably it wasn't even builtin. Mmm, probably you are using an older kernel then. Where may I get the latest? I am creating a new boot image. I recompiled all udebs and got the kernel -small-di from last Joey upload. Ciao, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: debian-installer: cannot start init on powerpc
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 09:46:17AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Giuseppe Sacco wrote: After the normal hardware recognition by the kernel the system did not start correctly init, giving this error message: Freeing unused kernel memory: 184k init 4k chrp 36k prep Warning: unable to open an initial console. Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! Could this be a devfs mount problem? CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y # CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set Perhaps this means you need to boot with devfs=mount,dall Is that not the case on all kernels ? As i understand it is needed to build without CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT because we want to use the same kernel devfs-less in normal operation too, right ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: step forward
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Detecting hardware... [...] then is says: 'Missing modules 'sungem, usb-storage' This must be the problem. 2.4.22-3 says : kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc (2.4.22-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Replaced GMAC driver by the SUNGMEM one. So, instead of having GMAC builtin, SUNGEM (there is a typo in the changelog) is also builtin, and not modular. Ideally the powerpc-small should replace the powerpc config in some future, and we should have more modular stuff, but until then, it would be nice that whatever is in charge of loading modules doesn't die when the stuff is builtin. This has come up before too. I checked this, when looking at the kernel init log. There wasn't eth0 detected, so probably it wasn't even builtin. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: debian-installer: cannot start init on powerpc
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:23, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 09:46:17AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Giuseppe Sacco wrote: [...] CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y # CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set Perhaps this means you need to boot with devfs=mount,dall Is that not the case on all kernels ? As i understand it is needed to build without CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT because we want to use the same kernel devfs-less in normal operation too, right ? I think so too. I saw from the log that joey committed a change about this yesterday. Probably it should be done against all kernels. Bye, Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: step forward
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:45, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto: On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Detecting hardware... [...] Ideally the powerpc-small should replace the powerpc config in some future, and we should have more modular stuff, but until then, it would be nice that whatever is in charge of loading modules doesn't die when the stuff is builtin. This has come up before too. I checked this, when looking at the kernel init log. There wasn't eth0 detected, so probably it wasn't even builtin. Mmm, probably you are using an older kernel then. Where may I get the latest? I am creating a new boot image. I recompiled all udebs and got the kernel -small-di from last Joey upload. Ah, that explains it. The -small config has CONFIG_SUNGEM=m as well as CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m. I guess what happens here is that you are using the -small kernel with the normal modules or something such. The -small has a lot more stuff modular so it can fit on a miboot floppy, but as thus, it also needs a lot more stuff to go into the module udebs, as well as a specific initrd. Try using the kernel from the -powerpc image directly. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash
List, I have purchased a 1GHz 15 PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for those being back up, so I am still trying to use this one. My installation failed to install to /target/ with a return value of 1. I was instructed to look at debootstrap.log and debootstrap.err.log in /target/var/log. I launched the ash shell from the install menu and tried to no avail to get a glimpse of these files. Can someone tell me how to view these log files when you do not have a successful installation of Debian on a system? I tried a number of the available commands from ash, but the commands don't behave the same. For example, more only confirms the existence of a file. Regards, -- Barry C. Hawkins All Things Computed site: www.allthingscomputed.com weblog: www.yepthatsme.com -- Barry C. Hawkins All Things Computed site: www.allthingscomputed.com weblog: www.yepthatsme.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash
Barry Hawkins wrote: List, I have purchased a 1GHz 15 PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for those being back up, so I am still trying to use this one. http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/ My installation failed to install to /target/ with a return value of 1. I was instructed to look at debootstrap.log and debootstrap.err.log in /target/var/log. I launched the ash shell from the install menu and tried to no avail to get a glimpse of these files. Can someone tell me how to view these log files when you do not have a successful installation of Debian on a system? I tried a number of the available commands from ash, but the commands don't behave the same. For example, more only confirms the existence of a file. I'd suggest cat, or nano. Myself, I use nano. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#225370: step forward
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:04:30AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Sven Luther wrote: Ah, that explains it. The -small config has CONFIG_SUNGEM=m as well as CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m. I guess what happens here is that you are using the -small kernel with the normal modules or something such. The -small has a lot more stuff modular so it can fit on a miboot floppy, but as thus, it also needs a lot more stuff to go into the module udebs, as well as a specific initrd. Try using the kernel from the -powerpc image directly. I double checked and as far as I can see, linux-kernel-di does not confuse the two sets of modules for the two powerpc kernels. It is possible that the image build process does however, or is using the wrong kernel. If there's anything I can do to help, I'm standing by. Getting powerpc working again has got to be a priority.. Ok, tell me the new directions to the new CVS repostitory (or maybe i need to be added to the alioth project or something) and i will give it a try. Also, i wonder if anyone has an idea if building the RTC clocks as modules would be acceptable. The CONFIG_GEN_RTC doesn't work on pegasos, but using the CONFIG_RTC that does work breaks pmacs. I have tried porting the CONFIG_RTC code to the per subarch CONFIG_GEN_RTC stuff, but without much luck yet. I haven't had enough time, and was sick sunday and yesterday. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222374: reassign to kernel
reassign 222374 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386 retitle 222374 vesafb is a module, but cannot work that way thanks Summarising: vesafb is built as a module in the debian kernel, and d-i tries to modprobe it, falling back on the less portable vga16fb if it fails to load. We're told that there is no way vesafb can work as a module however, even with debian's modifications. d-i has a boot option to not start the framebuffer, so what's left is a kernel bug. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign to kernel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 222374 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386 Bug#222374: d-i melts screen on sis 630 laptop Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386'. retitle 222374 vesafb is a module, but cannot work that way Bug#222374: d-i melts screen on sis 630 laptop Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash
On Dec 30, 2003, at 10:25 AM, Joey Hess wrote: Barry Hawkins wrote: List, I have purchased a 1GHz 15 PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for those being back up, so I am still trying to use this one. http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/ My installation failed to install to /target/ with a return value of 1. I was instructed to look at debootstrap.log and debootstrap.err.log in /target/var/log. I launched the ash shell from the install menu and tried to no avail to get a glimpse of these files. Can someone tell me how to view these log files when you do not have a successful installation of Debian on a system? I tried a number of the available commands from ash, but the commands don't behave the same. For example, more only confirms the existence of a file. I'd suggest cat, or nano. Myself, I use nano. -- see shy jo Joey, Many thanks! I will down load the new one and give it a go. I almost tried cat - darn! I may try the old CD just to satisfy my curiosity. Because my November iso is currently so old, would it benefit the effort to file an installation report? If not, I will just use the newer iso and get on with it. Regards, -- Barry C. Hawkins All Things Computed site: www.allthingscomputed.com weblog: www.yepthatsme.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225370: step forward
Sven Luther wrote: Ah, that explains it. The -small config has CONFIG_SUNGEM=m as well as CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m. I guess what happens here is that you are using the -small kernel with the normal modules or something such. The -small has a lot more stuff modular so it can fit on a miboot floppy, but as thus, it also needs a lot more stuff to go into the module udebs, as well as a specific initrd. Try using the kernel from the -powerpc image directly. I double checked and as far as I can see, linux-kernel-di does not confuse the two sets of modules for the two powerpc kernels. It is possible that the image build process does however, or is using the wrong kernel. If there's anything I can do to help, I'm standing by. Getting powerpc working again has got to be a priority.. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Installation Report
Erich Waelde wrote: Boot: net DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium Yes, I would like to have an expert switch, too :-) There is one now.. choose mirror ... proxy = http://192.168.1.42:80/apt-cacher/ will not work for installer download, but would be nice. Details? mounting partitions: loads jfs modules, but does not show in list (ext2 ext3 reiserfs) The jfs module was recently added, but there is no mkfs.jfs yet, so it will not show up as an available filesystem type yet. Someone who's interested will need to work on that.. installing base system: FAILS IMMEDIATELY with Invalid Release file, no entry for main/binary-386/Packages. find /target ... /target/var/lib/apt/lists/debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_Release.malformed which does, however, look innocent to my eyes. nothing in /target/var/log/debootstrap.* lots of messages on vc/4, but cannot get up to start of this problem I think that this is probably fixed in the most recent CD build, so please try it again. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash
Barry Hawkins wrote: Many thanks! I will down load the new one and give it a go. I almost tried cat - darn! I may try the old CD just to satisfy my curiosity. Because my November iso is currently so old, would it benefit the effort to file an installation report? If not, I will just use the newer iso and get on with it. Unfortunatly, our current powerpc isos probably do not work. This may chance in the next couple of days.. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#225344: base-config: aptitude dependency breaks debootstrap and pbuilder
Package: base-config Version: 2.03 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #225344 Hi, Note that this bug breaks debootstrap (aptitude is not installed, base-config can't be configured, debootstrap exits with an errorcode) and consequently pbuilder, which expects debootstrap to succeed. IMHO, front-end programs like aptitude should not be included in the debootstrap installed packages. I hope a better solution to get the needed packages to the installer is found. Best wishes, Teemu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports status update
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-29 20:36]: | Thorsten Sauter wrote: | there is currently no daily build. I have started it, but now pear.d.o | is not recovered/opened for me. So that's the same like powerpc... | waiting. | | I have created a cdrom-set, so I thing daily cdrom's should easily | creatable by manty. | | Would you like to try to get hppa enabled in the debian-installer | packager's architecture list? All I need is someone to test that | dpkg-buildpackage succeeds for the debian-installer package on hppa, and | that the resulting images minimally work (that at least the | debian-installer-demo package works, for instance). Then I can turn it | on and let the autobuilders at it. This can be a substitute for daily | builds; debian-cd is currently using this for powerpc since the daily | build is down. of course, I can do this. I will try the demo this weekend. And I know, that the installer itself works good on my hppa machine. Bye Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration
* Gaudenz Steinlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-30 10:54]: Package: netcfg Tags: d-i I submitted this email as a wishlist bug to netcfg. As I said before, this has been filed as #214491. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dec29th netinst broken
Harald Dunkel wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Harald Dunkel wrote: The new netinst iso of today gave me Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours. Still the same problem. Well I was over-optimisitic, but the latest images, just built, seem to work. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
cdrom install report in vmware (net problems, otherwise OK!)
Debian-installer-version: manty netinst CD, built today Method: cd install in vmware Machine: vmware Memory: 90 mb Root Device: 300 mb virtual scsi Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [E] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Well, this is a nice change -- it works again! I noticed that pcmcia-kernel-modules were installed, as hoped for, so pcmcia will probably work (this machine has no pcmcia though). It did not configure the network. netcfg is on the cd, but udeb_include is broken. I am working right now on fixing that (I broke it :-( ) It didn't prompt for a mirror, as one was not needed, so my interaction was limited to partitioning and hitting enter a few times. Slick! All the interesting stuff was after boot into the installed system. It still whines about /etc/mtab not existing, so my hack for that does not work. Something new: It loads the framebuffer again when booting the installed system. I hope this is only done if the initial install happened with framebuffer, and not always. Base-config 2.0 is on there, but it somehow got the debconf priority wrong so I saw the base-config menu. I stepped through the menu. The hostname was still localhost. I told apt-setup to use my cd, and it properly noticed it was a netinst CD, and defaulted to true when asking me if I wanted to add another apt source. Network was not available after reboot (see above), which is a problem, really. aptitude was installed, and was on base-config's list before dselect. Yay! Of course, there were no additional packages for me to install.. exim4 still has (none) as the mail name of the system. base-config completed ok. Overall, looks great, aside from the network setup problem. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#225333: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-12-28): deboostrap error ...
Sebastien Bacher wrote: Error were encountered while procession : base-config /usr/sbin/debootstrap: 1: sleep not found This problem is fixed in the latest CD images, built about half an hour ago, and available in the usual place. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: dec29th netinst broken
Joey Hess wrote: Harald Dunkel wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Harald Dunkel wrote: The new netinst iso of today gave me Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours. Still the same problem. Well I was over-optimisitic, but the latest images, just built, seem to work. Hooray. Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to connect to the net?
Hi folks, I just successfully installed Sarge netinst on my spare partition. But after a reboot there was a problem: The network wasn't up. And base-config did not allow me to configure anything else but a PPP connection. I'm not sure whether this is a problem of base-config, or of d-i. Regards Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports status update
Thorsten Sauter wrote: of course, I can do this. I will try the demo this weekend. And I know, that the installer itself works good on my hppa machine. If you wait until this weekend, there's a good chance it will miss beta 2. FWIW. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: cdrom install report in vmware (net problems, otherwise OK!)
Joey Hess wrote: It did not configure the network. netcfg is on the cd, but udeb_include is broken. I am working right now on fixing that (I broke it :-( ) Missing udeb_include on the cd. Manty has fixed this and updated the images. Base-config 2.0 is on there, but it somehow got the debconf priority wrong so I saw the base-config menu. I stepped through the menu. I checked and the cdebconf config database that was saved to /target had the priority at medium. This is very strange, since I never saw the main menu or any errors during my install. So why was the priority medium? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Reading debootstrap.log on a failed install using ash
Joey Hess wrote: Barry Hawkins wrote: Many thanks! I will down load the new one and give it a go. I almost tried cat - darn! I may try the old CD just to satisfy my curiosity. Because my November iso is currently so old, would it benefit the effort to file an installation report? If not, I will just use the newer iso and get on with it. Unfortunatly, our current powerpc isos probably do not work. This may chance in the next couple of days.. .. or next couple of hours. Our new powerpc isos work to at least some extent. They need testing badly. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: how to connect to the net?
Harald Dunkel wrote: I just successfully installed Sarge netinst on my spare partition. But after a reboot there was a problem: The network wasn't up. And base-config did not allow me to configure anything else but a PPP connection. I'm not sure whether this is a problem of base-config, or of d-i. You don't say what install media you used. If it was a netinst CD downloaded today, then that is a known problem, and it is fixed in the just-updated CD images. If you used some other means to install, or an older CD, it could be a different problem. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: test report
stefan wrote: trying the swiss german installation: - not all translations well done, screens are mixed german/ english German should be at 100% now, with only possibly a very few things (like cfdisk) not translated. I think you did an install right before most of that got in. - was trying also the english installation. not shure, but i think have seen in the english part screens which don't appear in the german part (selecting kernel, overview about installation status (list what is done and what is next) don't appear in the german part as much as in the english part) Nope, what happens is when something goes wrong you are dropped into the expert mode install to try to correct it. There are more strings in that mode, and so a larger chance that you will stumble over one that is not yet translated to german. - network configuration: have a external dsl router connected by tcp/ip to my computer. did not found guided installation of network parameters (address, gateway). = no internet installation possible, = solution: before ftp: downloads for apt, configure and start network manually = but after reboot network has to be restartet again, or change manually init.d It would help if you could provide some details of how the installer failed to configure your network (it should try dhcp and then if that fails, prompt you for IP addresses), and also what you did manually to fix it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#225545: mtab creation hack does not work
Package: prebaseconfig Severity: normal Tags: d-i I just tried a CD install current to today, and /target/etc/mtab did not get created. It seems that the mtab hack I put in prebaseconfig does not work. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.23 #1 Wed Dec 17 13:50:20 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
No Network Setup
Just installed using todays build. Everything installed fine but there was not way to set up my network. The computer is on a LAN and the install options only setup a ISP connection. With Beta 1 I was able to enter all the information to connect to my LAN. I can enter the info from the command line but an option to set it up would be nice.-- Deron D. Wilkerson Express Title Insurance Agency, Inc. PO Box 906 / 32 E Main St Duchesne, UT 84021 435-738-2533 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No Network Setup
Deron Wilkerson wrote: Just installed using todays build. Everything installed fine but there was not way to set up my network. The computer is on a LAN and the install options only setup a ISP connection. With Beta 1 I was able to enter all the information to connect to my LAN. I can enter the info from the command line but an option to set it up would be nice.-- This is fixed in the current netinst CDs. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
status of translation
Hello. May I ask what's wrong with status webpage? http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/ It shows that Polish has untranslated choose-mirror.po file. I've checked this file and it seems that it's correctly translated and up-to-date. So what's wrong? regards fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Feski aka fEnIo | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 _|_|_32-050 Skawina - Gowackiego 3/15 - w. maopolskie - Polska (0 0) phone:+48501608340 | ICQ:46704720 | GG:726362 | IRC:fEnIo ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
generally successful install report from usb keychain
Debian-installer-version: today's (second build) netinst CD from manty's home dir Method: booting from a 128 mb usb keychain with hd-media initrd I built, and the d-i ISO on it Machine: LC2000 laptop from LinuxCertified, Inc. Processor: 2.66 Ghz P4 Memory: 516 mb Root Device: 36 gb IDE Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Total time to install Debian: 5 minutes 15 seconds Number of keystrokes required in d-i: 34 Comments/Problems: I noticed that bugreporter-udeb was looking in the wrong place for the install-report.template. This will be fixed in 0.10, but I didn't get such a template in /root/ in the installed system. The installer finds my USB and internal NIC ok on this laptop. When I insert an old wavelan card, cardmgr notices it and loads the right module, but I get this error and the card never comes on: klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found anything that has helped. The install properly configured my network (internal NIC), did not ask me about mirror (good, this is a netinst CD), and finished quickly. I did notice the long pause while it was formatting the disk, with only a blue screen displayed, and again a several seconds pause with a blue screen in the middle of a deboostrap run, right after the Extracting packages step. I have figured out the base-config debconf priority problem. A workaround will be in prebaseconfig 0.47. I applied this workaround before finishing the install. Some ugly things during boot: - discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module failed to load with No such device. - While starting pcmcia, I got the error a module named pcmcia_core already exists. - Also while starting pcmcia, I got unresolved symbols in i82365.o. The symbol is isapnp_find_dev_R27cb2cad. That is in the isa-pnp module, which was not loaded at the time. - I still get the same orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use when inserting my wavelan card. base-config came up in high priority. It did time zone config, with default to Africa, which is silly. It needs to use d-i's location informaiton still. At high priority base-config insists that I configure an apt source, which is hard since I have no CD, no network cable, and only a USB keychain. This will be fixed in base-config 2.04; for now I hit the cancel button to get to the menu and continued from there. exim4 has a very strange default mail name: 127.0.0.1 localhost What on earth? Taking a look at /etc/mailname, I see: 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.1.1 debian. debian Something is _very_ broken here. FWIW, my /etc/hosts has the same. /etc/hostname has debian.; I don't know why the period is there. Lacking a network, I did not try to get X working. discover did load an i180_audio driver, so I tried to cat /etc/passwd to /dev/audio. This resuled in a fairly appropriate noise, but also some DMA overrun error messages. I had better luck with /vmlinuz, no DMA overrun messages. And my cat left the room, too. :-) Though USB obviously worked during the install, discover did not load the usb-ochi module for it, nor was usb-storage loaded. I think this was fixed in a recent upload of discover by its new maintainer though, and is only waiting for that to get into testing. After manually loading the modules, I was able to re-mount my keychain. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ARM library reduction issue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moving libdiscover.so.1.0.0 to libdiscover.so.1. Moving libc.so.6 to libc.so.6. Moving libdebconfclient.so.0 to libdebconfclient.so.0. Moving libdl.so.2 to libdl.so.2. Moving libdebian-installer.so.4 to libdebian-installer.so.4. Moving libm.so.6 to libm.so.6. Moving libgcc_s.so.1 to libgcc_s.so.1. Moving ld-linux.so.2 to ld-linux.so.2. Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so With output: readelf: Error: Cannot stat input file ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so. Someone reported the same problem on i386: jared_rhin1 Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so jared_rhin1 With output: readelf: Error: Cannot stat input file ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Installation Report (success)
Hello all, I did a simple installation (2 partitions / + /boot, no LVM, no raid) on my crash box. This is what I found. The bad news: Using mantys netinst CD (2003-12-30) with net boot method still fails on the already reported di-utils-devicefiles. The good news: Using expert, i.e. installing from CD rather than from apt repository on the network works fine! So this problem/dependency/whatever lurks on the mirrors rather than the installer image? Q: is ftp2.de.d.o a good choice for bleeding edge? Is there a problem (apart from just taking some time) in the replication across mirrors? Overall: I'm impressed with the installer! Thank you all very much for grinding this out! Cheers, Erich Debian-installer-version: 30-Dec-2003 sarge-i386-netinst.iso from http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/ Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Minor quirks: ~ * detect hw (1st run) + Loading ide-disk reported an error, because is is already loaded. This has been reported before. + When booting net, ide-cd failed with unresolved symbols (see below). Is this supposed to work? + When booting expert, ide-scsi failed to load with an error message. Since I don't need it, I didn't bother. Is this a (known) problem? * configure network On the CD image, there is still the version, where Configure network using dhcp and configure static network show up as two different items. I think, I have seen this merged into one line with a selection screen on a CVS image, so don't bother. * Choose a mirror Strange sorting in the country list, Germany (de) comes before Denmark (dk) :-) * Install the base system For Info: 75% is where the postinst/configure/update actions take place, the disk is used, but not heavily. (several ps aux) Someone mentioned this, so I had a look :-) * Install Grub Bootloader into sda4 (root partition) IMHO (hd1,3), not understandable by innocent folks --- worse: I cannot get out at this point AND if I leave the default '(hd0)', my MBR is gone. This has been reported before. This is not a problem for me, but for beginners. IMHO: I would heavily recommend a create a boot floppy option here (like in woody). I recommended this option to all those, who were requesting my assistance at installation time --- and wanted to keep their Windows partition working. With a boot floppy I believe it is simpler for beginners. Just my 2 cent. so: make this a wish list item then? --- Configuring the base system... Is this still the right list here? * Configure the keyboard ... Nothing did happen, returned to screen quickly Unfortunately, I do not find any hints in /var/log/... Error? Not a problem for me at this time and unless it's confirmed by someone else, of course. * Turned out that adduser failed. Digging in /var/log/base-config.log: /var/log/dpkg/info/passwd.config: line 283: 711 Segmentation fault \ adduser --disabled-password --gecos $RET $USER /dev/null chpasswd: line 1: unkown user x the second line looks like a consequense of the first. Later, on the shell prompt, adduser worked like a charm. * Set the host name and * configure apt apt-get update failed. turned out that /etc/hosts /etc/network/interfaces /etc/resolv.conf were not filled with the information given in the first stage of the installation. However, /etc/hostname was filled correctly, and the kernel modules for the ethernet card were loaded. This problem has been reported before, too, and possibly fixed. * Select packages to install uups, installs read-edid and mdetect (and more?) behind my neck! :-) Menu to choose between tasksel | aptitude | dselect WOW! Cool! Big applause here, folks! Selected aptitude, everyting worked as expected. * pcmcia-cs was installed despite the box not having any hw needing it. Most probably known feature. * Install selected packages I was wondering, what this would do, after I had installed stuff using aptitude already. Well, adds perl and libdb4.0. That's fine with me. Without Debconf_priority=low or medium, I probably won't see this item anyway. * no install_report.template in /root I think this was mentioned also. The Gory Details: ~ uname -a: Linux dione 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 GNU/Linux Date: Tue Dec 30 20:33:00 CET 2003 Method:
Processing of base-config_2.04_i386.changes
base-config_2.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-config_2.04.dsc base-config_2.04.tar.gz base-config_2.04_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
I used the current Sarge netinst CD to install Sid. It worked. But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i. Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver recommends wordlist, which aptitude resolved by selecting wcatalan instead of wamerican). It even insisted upon installing libc5 due to an unlucky chain of dependencies. IMHO dselect is more clever here. Regards Harri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: discover 2 test packages
Am Mit, den 24.12.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 13:46: Hi I fixed discover2 support in hw-detect yesterday (already in the archive thanks to joeyh) and now I uploaded discover2 packages for testing to my website: http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/d-i/discover2/ I renamed the packages to discover2-udeb and discover2-data-udeb. You have to change your pkg-lists to include them into your image. discover2-udeb is linked statically against libdiscover2 so you don't need to install any discover library. mklibs will probably copy libexpat to the image which is quite big. Someone has to build a -pic version of it to reduce the overhead of discover2. The discover2 package I consider nearly ready for upload and I will be looking for a sponsor soon. The discover2-data package needs some more work to be ready for an upload. I have to look over the build system again and make sure we include everything that currently is in discover-data (v1.5). I updated the discover-data package and synced it with the latest version of discover-data for discover1 (not yet in the archive). I consider this nearly ready for an udeb-only upload now. Since I did not notice any packaging effort on the side of progeny in the last weeks I would like the 3rd way of the discover transition (see my mail on this) and upload discover2 packages which contain only the udebs really soon now. Did someone test the packages or is somebody planing to do so? Or should I just ask for a sponsor and upload the packages and we can see what happens then? Gaudenz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pending translation uploads
These packages have many translation updates, and have not been uploaded. I cannot upload them either, due to their archutectures. Someone had better do it soon if you care about getting a fully translated beta 2 on their architectures: yaboot-installer aboot-installer palo-installer elilo-installer arcboot-installer delo-installer s390-dasd s390-netdevice silo-installer -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Harald Dunkel wrote: I used the current Sarge netinst CD to install Sid. It worked. But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i. Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver recommends wordlist, which aptitude resolved by selecting wcatalan instead of wamerican). It even insisted upon installing libc5 due to an unlucky chain of dependencies. IMHO dselect is more clever here. I think that atitude is a better choice than dselect for many users. The recommends behavior could perhaps be improved.. The default is still tasksel, for those who cannot handle either. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
ARM/i386 library reduction issue
[Joey == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:09:28 -0500] Vince Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W Vince ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so With output: readelf: Vince Error: Cannot stat input file Vince ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so. Joey jared_rhin1 Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W Joey ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so jared_rhin1 With output: Joey readelf: Error: Cannot stat input file Joey ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so. Philip I'll see about making a patch for mklibs tomorrow. Indeed, the updated version of mklibs Philip has created fixes the problem for me on i386. Hopefully Vince will have similar joy for his platform. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Truth is a great flirt. -- Franz Liszt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
base-config_2.04_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: base-config_2.04.dsc to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04.dsc base-config_2.04.tar.gz to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04.tar.gz base-config_2.04_all.deb to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 225057 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of bugreporter-udeb_0.10_i386.changes
bugreporter-udeb_0.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of prebaseconfig_0.47_i386.changes
prebaseconfig_0.47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installation Report (success)
Thank you for the detailed report. Erich Waelde wrote: The bad news: Using mantys netinst CD (2003-12-30) with net boot method still fails on the already reported di-utils-devicefiles. The good news: Using expert, i.e. installing from CD rather than from apt repository on the network works fine! So this problem/dependency/whatever lurks on the mirrors rather than the installer image? It was a problem on the mirrors, which I masked by a hack to the CD image, yes. In about 15 minutes it should be fixed on the mirrors too. I am not clear on why you needed to use expert mode to get it to install from CD. AFAIK that is the default for the netinst iso. Q: is ftp2.de.d.o a good choice for bleeding edge? Is there a problem (apart from just taking some time) in the replication across mirrors? That is a push secondary mirror; it should take less than an hour to get updates from the push primary mirrors, I'd expect. + When booting net, ide-cd failed with unresolved symbols (see below). Is this supposed to work? It's been tested very little. + When booting expert, ide-scsi failed to load with an error message. Since I don't need it, I didn't bother. Is this a (known) problem? Yes, it's a known problem, we don't use ide-scsi but discover still uts it in the list of modules. * configure network On the CD image, there is still the version, where Configure network using dhcp and configure static network show up as two different items. I think, I have seen this merged into one line with a selection screen on a CVS image, so don't bother. Hmm, that should not be the case with the current images. Just booted it again in expert and I see only Configure network. Moreover, the udebs that provide the other menu items are not even on the CD image. * Choose a mirror Strange sorting in the country list, Germany (de) comes before Denmark (dk) :-) Hm well, I think that is sorted at build time actually. That's worth a bug report.. --- Configuring the base system... Is this still the right list here? Yes please. * Configure the keyboard ... Nothing did happen, returned to screen quickly That is normal, it noticed that d-i already configured the keyboard. * Turned out that adduser failed. Digging in /var/log/base-config.log: /var/log/dpkg/info/passwd.config: line 283: 711 Segmentation fault \ adduser --disabled-password --gecos $RET $USER /dev/null chpasswd: line 1: unkown user x Yikes! * Select packages to install uups, installs read-edid and mdetect (and more?) behind my neck! :-) It does that in case you decide to install X in aptitude. For X to autoconfigure, they must be installed *before* X is installed, and this is the only way to be sure. It will remove them afterwards if you did not select X after all. * pcmcia-cs was installed despite the box not having any hw needing it. Most probably known feature. I decided to call it a feature, though this is debatable. :-) * Install selected packages I was wondering, what this would do, after I had installed stuff using aptitude already. Well, adds perl and libdb4.0. That's fine with me. Without Debconf_priority=low or medium, I probably won't see this item anyway. The problem is that I really want people to only _select_ items with aptitude, and then exit it, and let the installer install what was selected there, and possibly in tasksel too. But the natural thing to do, if you know aptitude is to hit gg and install. This is waiting for a --select-only option for aptititude. * no install_report.template in /root I think this was mentioned also. Will be fixed soon. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
prebaseconfig_0.47_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting bugs to severity fixed: 225545 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bugreporter-udeb_0.10_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47
tag 225545 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:51:25 -0500 Source: prebaseconfig Binary: prebaseconfig Architecture: source all Version: 0.47 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: prebaseconfig - Finish the installation and reboot (udeb) Closes: 225545 Changes: prebaseconfig (0.47) unstable; urgency=low . * Miguel Figueiredo - Updated Portuguese translation (pt.po) * Ming Hua - Initial Simplified Chinese translation (zh_CN.po) * Bart Cornelis - Merged Norwegian Nynorsk (nn.po) translation from skolelinux-cvs * Christian Perrier - Removed one unbreakable space in Lithuanian translation (consistency with di-utils) * Joey Hess - Remove some old cruft in 90prepare-base-config. - Add a hack to 93save-install-log to make sure that the debconf priority is in questions.dat for base-config. The problem was that if the default priority were used, it would be in templates.dat, and base-config does not read that file, and so uses debconf's default priority, which is medium. Better fixes are surely possible. - Add 50mtab-hack to package. Closes: #225545 Files: e98bce51363bcbfe9ea01d5f2919ef70 677 debian-installer required prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc 6e0b8f95802d2412786d27d8e98b5820 22536 debian-installer required prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz 6d278c9575218679ed85dc06c982ad33 10858 debian-installer required prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/8eqF2tp5zXiKP0wRAqjuAKCmkO1XnZjneUuTjVu0whIZfURvdwCfRuk0 dfTODg9iR5yfXLcQ8XJ4CyM= =337o -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: status of translation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2003-12-30 20:14, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: Hello. May I ask what's wrong with status webpage? http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/ It shows that Polish has untranslated choose-mirror.po file. I've checked this file and it seems that it's correctly translated and up-to-date. So what's wrong? these are updated every two hours, maybe it was only just checked in (doesn't show anything now) - -- Cheers, cobaco 1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB) 2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/8eyF5ihPJ4ZiSrsRAoqVAJ4pnTAtRMQZk0HHa4RdyCtEkLPOkgCfUoge VbB1SwoRe/oYuE1MbennZVg= =EV09 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: aptitude, was: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Hello Harri, aptitude options dependency handling: unselect: install suggested packages automatically and unselect: install recommended packages automatically First thing I do :-) and the world looks nicer for me. Erich -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ARM library reduction issue
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 21:09, Joey Hess wrote: jared_rhin1 Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so jared_rhin1 With output: readelf: Error: Cannot stat input file ./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so. I put an updated mklibs in http://people.debian.org/~pb/ and this seemed to fix the problem for jared_rhin1. Vince, would you like to give that a go? p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 225545 + fixed Bug#225545: mtab creation hack does not work Tags were: d-i Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aptitude defaults for d-i
[Joey == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:44:19 -0500] But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i. Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver recommends wordlist, which aptitude resolved by selecting wcatalan instead of wamerican). Joey The recommends behavior could perhaps be improved. I've found that just changing the default in aptitude to don't install recommends has helped trememdously in keeping a clean debian box. In my unreleased mini-distro, I use the following apt-conf.conf file: -- begin apt-conf.conf -- aptitude ; aptitude::UI ; aptitude::UI::New-Package-Commands true; aptitude::UI::Package-Header-Format %N %n #%B %u %o; aptitude::UI::Package-Status-Format %d; aptitude::UI::Package-Display-Format %c%a%M %p #%v%V; aptitude::UI::Default-Grouping filter(missing),task,status,section(subdir,passthrough),section(topdir); aptitude::UI::Advance-On-Action true; aptitude::UI::Description-Visible-By-Default true; aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Download-Bar false; aptitude::UI::Pause-After-Download false; aptitude::UI::Prompt-On-Exit false; aptitude::UI::Exit-On-Last-Close false; aptitude::UI::Incremental-Search true; aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Prompts true; aptitude::UI::Menubar-Autohide true; aptitude::UI::HelpBar true; aptitude::Pkg-Display-Limit ; aptitude::Delete-Unused-Pattern ; aptitude::Delete-Unused true; aptitude::Suggests-Important false; aptitude::Recommends-Important false; aptitude::Auto-Fix-Broken true; aptitude::Auto-Install true; aptitude::Log /var/log/aptitude; aptitude::Warn-Not-Root true; aptitude::Forget-New-On-Install false; aptitude::Forget-New-On-Update true; aptitude::Display-Planned-Action true; aptitude::Changelog-URL-Template http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/get-changelog?package=%s;; aptitude::AutoClean-After-Update true; aptitude::Auto-Upgrade true; -- end -- (I recall that some of these are the defaults, just pulled into this file for reference.) Probably no single configuration will make even a majority of users happy. If I recall correctly, the aptitude maintainer is pretty happy with the defaults, though presumably would consider changes if there was a community uprising. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] We suffer primarily not from our vices or our weaknesses, but from our illusions. We are haunted, not by reality, but by those images we have put in place of reality. - Daniel J. Boorstin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.changes
busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: busybox-cvs_20031212-3.dsc busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.deb busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00:
Some ugly things during boot:
- discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module
failed to load with No such device.
According to pci.lst these devices need the i810_rng module:
80862418bridge i810_rng82801AA PCI Bridge
80862428bridge i810_rng82801AB PCI Bridge
80862430bridge i810_rng82801AB PCI Bridge
80862448bridge i810_rng82815 PCI Bridge
8086244eunknown i810_rng82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset PCI
8086245eunknown i810_rng82801E PCI Bridge
Which one matches the pci id on your device?
exim4 has a very strange default mail name:
127.0.0.1 localhost
What on earth? Taking a look at /etc/mailname, I see:
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.1.1 debian. debian
Something is _very_ broken here. FWIW, my /etc/hosts has the same.
/etc/hostname has debian.; I don't know why the period is there.
I don't know where the dot comes from neither...
I'm wondering where /etc/hostname comes from at all...
The wired /etc/mailname comes from my totaly wrong fix for the mailname
issue (prebaseconfig copied /etc/hosts to /target/etc/mailname).
The patch I attached should fix this in theory, but as I only have a
modem connection atm I'm unable to test it. I will try to do at least
half of an install.
Gaudenz
Index: netcfg-common.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/tools/netcfg/netcfg-common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -u -r1.9 netcfg-common.c
--- netcfg-common.c 27 Dec 2003 02:47:13 - 1.9
+++ netcfg-common.c 30 Dec 2003 22:33:30 -
@@ -455,7 +455,9 @@
di_system_prebaseconfig_append(prebaseconfig, cp %s %s\n,
HOSTS_FILE, /target HOSTS_FILE);
di_system_prebaseconfig_append(prebaseconfig, cp %s %s\n,
- HOSTS_FILE, /target MAIL_FILE);
+ HOSTNAME_FILE, /target MAILNAME_FILE);
+di_system_prebaseconfig_append(prebaseconfig, cp %s %s\n,
+ HOSTNAME_FILE, /target HOSTNAME_FILE);
}
if ((fp = file_open(RESOLV_FILE, w))) {
Index: netcfg.h
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/tools/netcfg/netcfg.h,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -u -r1.15 netcfg.h
--- netcfg.h 24 Dec 2003 00:13:46 - 1.15
+++ netcfg.h 30 Dec 2003 22:33:30 -
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@
#define DHCPCD_DIR /etc/dhcpc
#define INTERFACES_FILE /etc/network/interfaces
#define HOSTS_FILE /etc/hosts
-#define MAIL_FILE /etc/mailname
+#define MAILNAME_FILE /etc/mailname
+#define HOSTNAME_FILE /etc/hostname
#define NETWORKS_FILE /etc/networks
#define RESOLV_FILE /etc/resolv.conf
#define DHCPCD_FILE /etc/dhcpc/config
busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz busybox-cvs_20031212-3.dsc to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20031212-3.dsc busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.deb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 225360 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports status update
Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me): i386: On track for beta 2 powerpc: Very shakey ia64: Likely to be in beta 2 mips: May be in beta 2 arm: Uncertian The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have d-i kernels yet. Ow. Is this even likely to be released with sarge at this rate? mipsel: ? What is the status of these others, then? I'm going to make wild, uneducated guesses. :-) m68k: ??? No signs of activity since October? amiga and mac appear to be the only variants which even have kernels built? Is this even likely to get released with sarge at this rate? sparc: ??? One buildd apparently up, and only one. But people are definitely working on d-i for sparc, and the kernels look OK. alpha: ??? Used to be one of the better supported arches, but it doesn't look like anyone's worked on it since October? hppa: Close to working. Apparently Thorsten Sauter has this working, and it's just a matter of getting the build process automated properly? s390: ??? Buildds are still down for s390. At least the infamous busybox bug #216528 has recently been fixed. Ports of software to s390 seem to have a curious habit of going from totally broken to totally working very quickly (maybe because the machines are so fast that the testing cycle is extra-fast?), so I'm not about to worry, though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.changes
yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pending translation uploads
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 22:39, Joey Hess ha scritto: These packages have many translation updates, and have not been uploaded. I cannot upload them either, due to their archutectures. Someone had better do it soon if you care about getting a fully translated beta 2 on their architectures: [...] I'll upload yaboot-installer Bye, Giuseppe signature.asc Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration
Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 17:28: * Gaudenz Steinlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-30 10:54]: Package: netcfg Tags: d-i I submitted this email as a wishlist bug to netcfg. As I said before, this has been filed as #214491. sorry about that. I only checked the bug reports for netcfg and missed this report. IMHO the right place for this bug report is netcfg. May I reassign and merge #214491? I also filed a wishlist bug to wireless-tools for an udeb. Gaudenz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: building d-i for sparc
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for all relevant image types. cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's not something I'm concerned about. (Few sparcs I've seen have floppy. sparc64 openboot apparently has bugs so it won't boot from floppy.) b. Get a daily autobuild set up (see build/daily-build). c. Point manty at that so he can get sparc cdroms building. d. Work with me to get sparc turned on in its architecture list, so sparc images can enter the archive. I think silo-installer is needed before we start bothering with any automatic building. e. Test test test.. My next goal is booting from a hand-built cdrom, seeing if I can start walking through the d-i prompts. Looking at the contents of the sparc-mini iso, this is much simplier than I thought. Obviously, no useful install can be done with no silo-installer. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install report (not successfull, 2nd image of 20031230, i386)
Hello all, I just pressed send and reload and there was a new netinst-image! Well, then just try this also. Debian-installer-version: 30-Dec-2003 11:11h netinst.iso 2nd build from http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/ just to be sure: md5sum sarge-i386-netinst-20031230.2.iso 8d88a368fc2225144b8592d75684 sarge-i386-netinst-20031230.2.iso to make it short: This image is no good for my box. - network cannot be configured, because ne2k-pci fails to load with unresolved symbols: insmod: unresolved symbol ei_close_Rc8e3042e insmod: unresolved symbol ei_open_R8c9e3b69 insmod: unresolved symbol ethdev_init_R2342cc80 insmod: unresolved symbol ei_interrupr_Rb93d8fa5 insmod: unresolved symbol NS8390_init_Rd79efca9 this worked on the image before. - ncr53c8xx (scsi) is missing and sym53c8xx is not loaded through the hw detection phase. loading sym53c8xx, sr_mod and sd_mod manually results in the SCSI disks being avaliable, though. this worked on the image before - booting net still results in the di-utils-devicefiles problem, see my last message - I noticed that the selection list in Load installer modules is considerably shorter when booting expert instead of net. That may or may not be a problem This time I got a whee bit more fancy and requested lvmcfg and md-modules to be installed. + configure LVM shows up and works, which is nice :-) - ext3 has vanished from the selection in conf.+mount filesystems - I needed to mount /boot manually, not sure why. Its on ide (not scsi), and I requested the file system to be left alone. mount /dev/hda1 /target/boot would not work, whereas mount /dev/discs/disc0/part1 /target/boot did. - installing the kernel failed, with mk.initrd claiming that /dev/vg00/lvol1 does not exist. This is not correct, but it makes dpkg install kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386 fail. This leaves the system in an unbootable state, at which point I think, it's time to quit for today. At this time I would not call the last 3 points a problem, since it can all stem from the same source as the unresolved symbols, namely some build error on the image. Cheers, Erich Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [E] unresolved symbols on ne2k-pci Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [E] ide drive ok, scsi only after loading sym53c8xx manually Partition hard drives: [O] ---configure LVM[O] Create file systems:[O] no ext3 any more ? reiserfs. Mount partitions: [E] did not mount /dev/hda1, manually ok. Install base system:[O] ---extra packages [O] ---kernel [E] mk.initrd: /dev/vg00/lvol1 does not exist ? Lie! fails at this point. Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225583: installation-reports: Installation report (2003-12-30): libacl1 error
Package: installation-reports Version: 2003-12-30 (11:01) Severity: normal Tags: d-i (Same config as in #220014). Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[E] An error on libacl1 package ... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux seb128 2.6.0 #1 Sun Dec 21 12:54:10 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-15 (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225584: make cd_image requires updated mtools
Package: debian-installer Tags: d-i Severity: minor In the CVS head as d-i as of 2003-12-30, a 'make cd_image' on my machine fails with: mkfs.msdos 2.10 (22 Sep 2003) # mkfs.msdos gets the mode wrong (bug filed) chmod 644 dest/cdrom-image.img.new mcopy -idest/cdrom-image.img.new ./tmp/cdrom/vmlinuz ::\linux mcopy: invalid option -- i Mtools version 3.9.8, dated 27 May 2001 Usage: mcopy [-spatnmQVBT] [-D clash_option] sourcefile targetfile mcopy [-spatnmQVBT] [-D clash_option] sourcefile [sourcefiles...] targetdirectory make: *** [dest/cdrom-image.img] Error 1 My version of mtools is: mtools/stable uptodate 3.9.8-7 This problem goes away after updating to: mtools/stable uptodate 3.9.8-7 Perhaps d-i should build-depend on the higher mtools version. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tiger gotta hunt. Bird gotta fly. Man gotta sit and wonder why, why, why. Tiger gotta sleep. Bird gotta land. Man gotta tell himself he understand. -- Kurt Vonnegut Jr. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225360: marked as done (udeb still has no freeramdisk)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:17:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#225360: fixed in busybox-cvs 20031212-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2003 04:15:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 28 22:15:40 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AanEf-0005mz-00; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:34:25 -0600 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs19-172.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1286E18568 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 02:34:13 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D9E76EC6B; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:22:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:22:18 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: udeb still has no freeramdisk Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.37 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_28 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_28 X-Spam-Level: --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: busybox-cvs Version: 20031212 Severity: normal * debian/config-udeb: - Enable freeramdisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian-installer/build/apt.udeb/cache/archivesdpkg --con= tents busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-2_i386.udeb|grep freeramdisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian-installer/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives It is needed for d-i to support machines with only 32 mb of memory. I would apreciate an upload before beta2. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.23 #1 Wed Dec 17 13:50:20 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US --=20 see shy jo --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/74/Zd8HHehbQuO8RAgMvAJ4qHucIyn9z0ozliizwtFTqR7LSWgCg0aOt UQ8YT0N2rar0taqrvbMbGLE= =TSZZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- --- Received: (at 225360-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2003 23:13:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 17:13:22 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbSHm-0002V1-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:24:22 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbSAs-0004jM-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:17:14 -0500 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#225360: fixed in busybox-cvs 20031212-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:17:14 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: busybox-cvs Source-Version: 20031212-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of busybox-cvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz busybox-cvs_20031212-3.dsc to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20031212-3.dsc busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.deb to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: I don't know where the dot comes from neither... I'm wondering where /etc/hostname comes from at all... The wired /etc/mailname comes from my totaly wrong fix for the mailname issue (prebaseconfig copied /etc/hosts to /target/etc/mailname). The patch I attached should fix this in theory, but as I only have a modem connection atm I'm unable to test it. I will try to do at least half of an install. I don't feel this is the right fix. /etc/hostname does not have the same format as /etc/hosts either! Instead, why not just make netcfg echo the hostname to /proc/sys/kernel/hostname. I belive that exim4's postinst will do the right thing if the hostname is actually set. We may also need to write a (correct) value to /etc/hostname, but I'm not sure. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:23:44PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00: What on earth? Taking a look at /etc/mailname, I see: 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.1.1 debian. debian Something is _very_ broken here. FWIW, my /etc/hosts has the same. /etc/hostname has debian.; I don't know why the period is there. I don't know where the dot comes from neither... It comes from netcfg, which writes it because the domain is the empty string instead of NULL. I've just fixed this in CVS. -- Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports status update
Nathanael Nerode wrote: Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me): i386: On track for beta 2 powerpc: Very shakey ia64: Likely to be in beta 2 mips: May be in beta 2 arm: Uncertian The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have d-i kernels yet. Ow. Is this even likely to be released with sarge at this rate? I have seen some recent activity from Vincent Sanders, so I still have some hope for beta 3. mipsel: ? What is the status of these others, then? I'm going to make wild, uneducated guesses. :-) What, like my guesses were not wild and uneducated? :-) m68k: ??? No signs of activity since October? amiga and mac appear to be the only variants which even have kernels built? Is this even likely to get released with sarge at this rate? Obviosuly not. A port can only miss so many betas, before it ends up missing the release.. sparc: ??? One buildd apparently up, and only one. But people are definitely working on d-i for sparc, and the kernels look OK. I assume that buildds will be coming back on line when James Troup and others get back from holidays. alpha: ??? Used to be one of the better supported arches, but it doesn't look like anyone's worked on it since October? Unfortunatly the CD images are broken. hppa: Close to working. Apparently Thorsten Sauter has this working, and it's just a matter of getting the build process automated properly? Seems so. s390: ??? Buildds are still down for s390. At least the infamous busybox bug #216528 has recently been fixed. Ports of software to s390 seem to have a curious habit of going from totally broken to totally working very quickly (maybe because the machines are so fast that the testing cycle is extra-fast?), so I'm not about to worry, though. Ditto. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: building d-i for sparc
Blars Blarson wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for all relevant image types. cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's not something I'm concerned about. (Few sparcs I've seen have floppy. sparc64 openboot apparently has bugs so it won't boot from floppy.) b. Get a daily autobuild set up (see build/daily-build). c. Point manty at that so he can get sparc cdroms building. d. Work with me to get sparc turned on in its architecture list, so sparc images can enter the archive. I think silo-installer is needed before we start bothering with any automatic building. Well yeah, it's kind of pointless to get it building on the autobuilders before it can usefully install a system. However, it does seem like you could take care of d. in short order from where you are now. Note that the autobuilt stuff is only boot images, not full CDs, so the lack of a boot loader installer does not directly impact it. e. Test test test.. My next goal is booting from a hand-built cdrom, seeing if I can start walking through the d-i prompts. Looking at the contents of the sparc-mini iso, this is much simplier than I thought. Obviously, no useful install can be done with no silo-installer. Is there something badly wrong with the one in CVS? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of debian-installer_20031230_i386.changes
debian-installer_20031230_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20031230.dsc debian-installer_20031230.tar.gz debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb debian-installer-images_20031230_i386.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#212143: netcfg mailname
/etc/mailname does not have the same format as /etc/hostname, so this change to netcfg royally stuffed it. Please test changes before committing! I think that all netcfg has to do is actually set the hostname. It could do this by echoing the hostname to a file in /proc, for example. exim4's ostinst will then pick up on that and put it in /etc/mailname. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Am Mit, den 31.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 01:06: Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: I don't know where the dot comes from neither... I'm wondering where /etc/hostname comes from at all... The wired /etc/mailname comes from my totaly wrong fix for the mailname issue (prebaseconfig copied /etc/hosts to /target/etc/mailname). The patch I attached should fix this in theory, but as I only have a modem connection atm I'm unable to test it. I will try to do at least half of an install. I don't feel this is the right fix. /etc/hostname does not have the same format as /etc/hosts either! I don't understand this comment. /etc/hostname is copied to /target/etc/hostname. This does not assume that /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts have the same format. Instead, why not just make netcfg echo the hostname to /proc/sys/kernel/hostname. This could additionaly be done, but I don't think it is needed. The installer just works fine without it. This does not solve the issue that the hostname and mailname are not correct after reboot. I belive that exim4's postinst will do the right thing if the hostname is actually set. We may also need to write a (correct) value to /etc/hostname, but I'm not sure. That's what my patch intended to do. The only thing I'm not sure about and cannot test right now is if /etc/hostname exists after netcfg in the installer ramdisk. Gaudenz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports status update
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:29:58PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: alpha: ??? Used to be one of the better supported arches, but it doesn't look like anyone's worked on it since October? Where d-i work is concerned, alpha is my next priority. My first priority is getting a set of working XFS images, since those I actually need for work. :) It looked like things were in pretty good shape when I last worked on it, though; shouldn't take more than a couple days to get everything on its feet again. It's probably a safe bet that this won't be ready in time for beta2, but hopefully soon thereafter. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#225545: marked as done (mtab creation hack does not work)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:49:02 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2003 18:03:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 12:03:32 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbNyE-0002JM-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:47:54 -0600 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs25-237.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6F3186C1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:47:51 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E9A86E0EB; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:53:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:53:48 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mtab creation hack does not work Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.37 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 X-Spam-Level: --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: prebaseconfig Severity: normal Tags: d-i I just tried a CD install current to today, and /target/etc/mtab did not get created. It seems that the mtab hack I put in prebaseconfig does not work. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.23 #1 Wed Dec 17 13:50:20 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US --=20 see shy jo --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/8busd8HHehbQuO8RAqL7AKCgXKTRRqVyQcckRRDvTxudtjxwAQCfc12v n3f9UvnxdsfDuS3juJg9MiI= =0eHS -END PGP SIGNATURE- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- --- Received: (at 225545-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 00:24:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 18:24:14 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbTWy-0006KG-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:44:08 -0600 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs19-176.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F36A186EA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:43:20 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D04826E0EB; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:49:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:49:02 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 X-Spam-Level: --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not a NMU. Joey Hess wrote: tag 225545 + fixed =20 quit =20 This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload.
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00: Some ugly things during boot: - discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module failed to load with No such device. According to pci.lst these devices need the i810_rng module: 80862418bridge i810_rng82801AA PCI Bridge 80862428bridge i810_rng82801AB PCI Bridge 80862430bridge i810_rng82801AB PCI Bridge 80862448bridge i810_rng82815 PCI Bridge 8086244eunknown i810_rng82820 820 (Camino 2) Chipset PCI 8086245eunknown i810_rng82801E PCI Bridge Which one matches the pci id on your device? 8086244e -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 04:00:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Total time to install Debian: 5 minutes 15 seconds Wow. :-) klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found anything that has helped. FWIW I've seen this too. I never solved it, but AFAIK somebody I knew fixed it by enabling both ISA support (!) _and_ ISA PnP (!!) in the kernel config. (I was told this was because PCMCIA (as opposed to CardBus) actually is an ISA-style bus.) I don't know what Debian's kernels do... /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-installer/rootskel/debian changelog,1.168,1.169
So why does rootskel need /var/run? Just curious.. + * Matt Kraai +- Create /var/run. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain
Joey Hess wrote: I don't feel this is the right fix. /etc/hostname does not have the same format as /etc/hosts either! Instead, why not just make netcfg echo the hostname to /proc/sys/kernel/hostname. I belive that exim4's postinst will do the right thing if the hostname is actually set. We may also need to write a (correct) value to /etc/hostname, but I'm not sure. It may need to set /etc/hostname after all. I have a fix that has been tested to work well, but I'll need to merge in Matt's recent changes and re-test it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#225057: marked as done (Updated Swedish debconf translation)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:17:33 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#225057: fixed in base-config 2.04 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2003 13:29:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 25 07:29:15 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp7.hy.skanova.net [195.67.199.140] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AZVKa-0003q2-00; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:15:12 -0600 Received: from telia.com (h144n2fls33o87.telia.com [213.67.58.144]) by smtp7.hy.skanova.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBPDFAtN013722 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:15:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 14:11:45 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIERhaGxxdmlzdA==?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Updated Swedish debconf translation Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=000805040409030607090705 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --000805040409030607090705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: base-config Version: 2.03 Severity: wishlist Attached is an updated Swedish translation of the debconf messages. --=20 Andr=C3=A9 Dahlqvist --000805040409030607090705 Content-Type: text/plain; name=sv.po Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=sv.po IyBTT01FIERFU0NSSVBUSVZFIFRJVExFLgojIENvcHlyaWdodCAoQykgWUVBUiBUSEUgUEFD S0FHRSdTIENPUFlSSUdIVCBIT0xERVIKIyBUaGlzIGZpbGUgaXMgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k ZXIgdGhlIHNhbWUgbGljZW5zZSBhcyB0aGUgUEFDS0FHRSBwYWNrYWdlLgojIEZJUlNUIEFV VEhPUiA8RU1BSUxAQUREUkVTUz4sIFlFQVIuCiMKIyAgICBUcmFuc2xhdG9ycywgcGxlYXNl IHJlYWQgL3Vzci9zaGFyZS9kb2MvcG8tZGViY29uZi9SRUFETUUtdHJhbnMKIyAgICAgICAg IG9yIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZGViaWFuLm9yZy9pbnRsL2wxMG4vcG8tZGViY29uZi9SRUFETUUt dHJhbnMKIwptc2dpZCAiIgptc2dzdHIgIiIKIlByb2plY3QtSWQtVmVyc2lvbjogYmFzZS1j b25maWcgMi4wM1xuIgoiUmVwb3J0LU1zZ2lkLUJ1Z3MtVG86IFxuIgoiUE9ULUNyZWF0aW9u LURhdGU6IDIwMDMtMTItMTAgMDA6NDIrMDIwMFxuIgoiUE8tUmV2aXNpb24tRGF0ZTogMjAw My0xMi0yNSAxOToxMiswMTAwXG4iCiJMYXN0LVRyYW5zbGF0b3I6IEFuZHLDqSBEYWhscXZp c3QgPGFuZHJlLmRhaGxxdmlzdEB0ZWxpYS5jb20+XG4iCiJMYW5ndWFnZS1UZWFtOiBTd2Vk aXNoIDxkZWJpYW4tYm9vdEBsaXN0cy5kZWJpYW4ub3JnPlxuIgoiTUlNRS1WZXJzaW9uOiAx LjBcbiIKIkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZTogdGV4dC9wbGFpbjsgY2hhcnNldD1VVEYtOFxuIgoiQ29u dGVudC1UcmFuc2Zlci1FbmNvZGluZzogOGJpdFxuIgoKIy4gVHlwZTogdGl0bGUKIy4gRGVz Y3JpcHRpb24KIzogLi4vdGVtcGxhdGVzOjMKbXNnaWQgIkRlYmlhbiBiYXNlIHN5c3RlbSBj b25maWd1cmF0aW9uIgptc2dzdHIgIktvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24gYXYgRGViaWFucyBncnVuZHN5 c3RlbSIKCiMuIFR5cGU6IHNlbGVjdAojLiBEZXNjcmlwdGlvbgojOiAuLi90ZW1wbGF0ZXM6 OAptc2dpZCAiQ2hvb3NlIHRoZSBuZXh0IHN0ZXAgaW4gdGhlIGluc3RhbGwgcHJvY2Vzczoi Cm1zZ3N0ciAiVsOkbGogbsOkc3RhIHN0ZWcgaSBpbnN0YWxsYXRpb25zcHJvY2Vzc2VuOiIK CiMuIFR5cGU6IHNlbGVjdAojLiBEZXNjcmlwdGlvbgojOiAuLi90ZW1wbGF0ZXM6OAptc2dp ZCAiVGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgYmFzZSBzeXN0ZW0gY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBtZW51LiIKbXNnc3Ry ICJEZXR0YSDDpHIga29uZmlndXJhdGlvbnNtZW55biBmw7ZyIGdydW5kc3lzdGVtZXQiCgoj LiBUeXBlOiBub3RlCiMuIERlc2NyaXB0aW9uCiM6IC4uL3RlbXBsYXRlczoxMwptc2dpZCAi V2VsY29tZSB0byB5b3VyIG5ldyBEZWJpYW4gc3lzdGVtISIKbXNnc3RyICJWw6Rsa29tbWVu IHRpbGwgZGl0dCBueWEgRGViaWFuc3lzdGVtISIKCiMuIFR5cGU6IG5vdGUKIy4gRGVzY3Jp cHRpb24KIzogLi4vdGVtcGxhdGVzOjEzCm1zZ2lkICIiCiJUaGlzIHByb2dyYW0gd2lsbCBu b3cgd2FsayB5b3UgdGhyb3VnaCB0aGUgcHJvY2VzcyBvZiBzZXR0aW5nIHVwIHlvdXIgbmV3 bHkgIgoiaW5zdGFsbGVkIHN5c3RlbS4gSXQgd2lsbCBzdGFydCB3aXRoIHRoZSBiYXNpY3Mg LS0gdGltZSB6b25lIHNlbGVjdGlvbiwgIgoic2V0dGluZyBhIHJvb3QgcGFzc3dvcmQgYW5k IGFkZGluZyBhIHVzZXIsIGFuZCB0aGVuIHByb2dyZXNzIHRvIGluc3RhbGxpbmcgIgoiYWRk aXRpb25hbCBzb2Z0d2FyZSB0byB0dW5lIHRoaXMgbmV3IERlYmlhbiBzeXN0ZW0gdG8geW91 ciBuZWVkcy4iCm1zZ3N0ciAiIgoiRGV0dGEgcHJvZ3JhbSBrb21tZXIgbnUgYXR0IGxlZGEg ZGlnIGlnZW5vbSBwcm9jZXNzZW4gYXR0IHPDpHR0YSBpIG9yZG5pbmcgIgoiZGl0dCBueWlu c3RhbGxlcmFkZSBzeXN0ZW0uIERldCBrb21tZXIgYXR0IHN0YXJ0YSBtZWQgZ3J1bmRlcm5h
Processed: merge wifi bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 214491 netcfg Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `netcfg'. severity 214491 wishlist Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb Severity set to `wishlist'. merge 214491 225512 Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb Bug#225512: netcfg: add wifi configuration Merged 214491 225512. Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-installer_20031230_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb debian-installer_20031230.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20031230.dsc debian-installer_20031230.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20031230.tar.gz Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 225389 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pcmcia RequestIRQ problem (was Re: generally successful install report from usb keychain)
Package: debian-installer Tags: d-i I wrote: klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found anything that has helped. Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: FWIW I've seen this too. I never solved it, but AFAIK somebody I knew fixed it by enabling both ISA support (!) _and_ ISA PnP (!!) in the kernel config. (I was told this was because PCMCIA (as opposed to CardBus) actually is an ISA-style bus.) I don't know what Debian's kernels do... Well we obviously need a bug report for this. Mainly what I found on google for this error message were suggestions to make sure that ISA support was in the kernel, which it is for the d-i boot kernel: CONFIG_ISA=y CONFIG_EISA=y CONFIG_ISAPNP=m In private mail, Jan Lübbe reported he also had the problem with 2.6.0-test9, and that he solved it by building with isa-pnp not as a module. I've tried loading isa-pnp on my notebook before starting pcmcia, but it doesn't do anything. I did find a way to make it work for me. If I comment out either or both of these lines in /etc/pcmcia/config.opts, my orinoco card works: exclude irq 4 exclude irq 7 It seems it can only use irq 4 or 7, no others work for some reason. /proc/interrupts shows only these irqs in use: 0, 1, 2, 8, 14, 15. The cardbus controller is on 3. Why can't it use irqs 3, 5, 6, or 10-13, or share an IRQ? I don't know. Perhaps for d-i we should remove the exclude irq lines entirely from the config.opts. I really don't know. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#206531: marked as done (Problems building d-i after upgrading Sid chroot)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:47:15 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#206531: Problems building d-i after upgrading Sid chroot has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2003 10:04:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 21 05:04:15 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19pmIh-0007sj-00; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 05:04:15 -0500 Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19pmIc-0005Hx-Pi for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:04:10 +0200 Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202]) by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19pmIS-0006qx-SP; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:04:00 +0200 Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7) id 19pmII-00061T-00; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:03:50 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problems building d-i after upgrading Sid chroot From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:03:50 +0200 X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have questions about this scanning. X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libc6-pic Version: 2.3.2-3 Severity: serious After upgrading my Sid chroot, the cdrom floppy built by d-i is unable to boot properly. These are the last messages printed when booting the floppy: RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Freeing initrd memory: 1441k freed VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Mounted devsf on /dev VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Trying to move old root to /initrd .. failed Unmounting old root Trying to free ramdisk memory ... failed Mounted devfs on /dev Freeing unused kernel memory: 72k freed I upgraded these packages: The following NEW packages will be installed: libbz2-1.0 python2.3 The following packages will be upgraded apt apt-utils base-files binutils build-essential console-common console-data console-tools coreutils cpp cpp-3.3 debconf debconf-i18n debconf-utils debhelper devscripts discover-data e2fslibs e2fsprogs file fileutils g++ g++-3.3 gcc gcc-3.3 gcc-3.3-base libblkid1 libc6 libc6-dev libc6-pic libcomerr2 libconsole libcurl2 libdb4.1 libdebconfclient0 libdebconfclient0-dev libgcc1 libmagic1 libsasl2 libss2 libstdc++5 libstdc++5-3.3-dev libuuid1 locales man-db modutils nano netbase passwd perl perl-base perl-modules python python2.2 shellutils tasksel textutils We suspect the upgraded libc provoked the problem. That is why I report it against libc6-pic. More info will be provided when we know more. --- Received: (at 206531-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 02:43:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 20:43:40 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbRhs-0007Fx-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:47:17 -0600 Received: from dixie.nexus.co.uk ([81.96.69.239]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:47:16 + Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by dixie.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AbRhr-0001Qe-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:47:15 + Subject: Re: Bug#206531: Problems building d-i after upgrading Sid chroot From: Philip Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:47:15 + Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
Bug#222631: marked as done (/etc/mailname is (none))
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#222631: fixed in netcfg 0.40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Dec 2003 15:24:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 01 09:24:34 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AQpuc-0006Jn-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 09:24:34 -0600 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs5-222.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFAB17DEA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:24:32 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BB3856F3A5; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:31:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:31:03 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: /etc/mailname is (none) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debian-installer Version: 20031119 Severity: important Tags: d-i After installing d-i from a cd images dated 20031119, which found my NIC and got an IP with dhcp, /etc/mailname contained (none). With the new base-config (2.0), exim4-config will not even prompt for the mailname (it's priority medium), and this will likely result in broken mails from systems installed from d-i. I think that the (none) comes from exim4-config running hostname to get the mail name, during debootstrap, when perhaps the system's hostname has not been set due to an oversight in d-i. But I've not really tried to track it down. --=20 see shy jo --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/yuAnd8HHehbQuO8RAnBaAJ42X2O/eLyobn9P7g5U/xtS8irZxwCcCaje dHaWE3H7DvvVlsPI0D9+bWw= =VSDf -END PGP SIGNATURE- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- --- Received: (at 222631-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 03:07:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 21:07:05 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbWEd-0005pT-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:37:23 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbWAx-0002Zt-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#222631: fixed in netcfg 0.40 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source: netcfg Source-Version: 0.40 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netcfg-dhcp_0.40_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.40_i386.udeb netcfg-static_0.40_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.40_i386.udeb netcfg_0.40.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.40.dsc netcfg_0.40.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.40.tar.gz netcfg_0.40_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.40_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Install report (not successfull, 2nd image of 20031230, i386)
Erich Waelde wrote: Debian-installer-version: 30-Dec-2003 11:11h netinst.iso 2nd build from http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/ just to be sure: md5sum sarge-i386-netinst-20031230.2.iso 8d88a368fc2225144b8592d75684 sarge-i386-netinst-20031230.2.iso That's the same as my copy.. to make it short: This image is no good for my box. - network cannot be configured, because ne2k-pci fails to load with unresolved symbols: insmod: unresolved symbol ei_close_Rc8e3042e insmod: unresolved symbol ei_open_R8c9e3b69 insmod: unresolved symbol ethdev_init_R2342cc80 insmod: unresolved symbol ei_interrupr_Rb93d8fa5 insmod: unresolved symbol NS8390_init_Rd79efca9 this worked on the image before. I can't reproduce this, just booted and manually modprobed it and it loaded without problem. I don't have a card to try it with, but all the symbols are resolved. Also tried it with net boot type, same result. The symbols you list as missing are in the 8390 module AFAIK. It sounds as if you got a broken modules.dep somehow and modprobe did not load 8390; but it works here. - ncr53c8xx (scsi) is missing and sym53c8xx is not loaded through the hw detection phase. loading sym53c8xx, sr_mod and sd_mod manually results in the SCSI disks being avaliable, though. this worked on the image before ncr53c8xx is available in the installer initrd after the installer loaded is components from CD. sym53c8xx is part of the debian-installer CD boot initrd, so it should be available the instant the installer boots (and is, in my testing). - booting net still results in the di-utils-devicefiles problem, see my last message I have just verified that di-utils-devicefiles is not in the Packages file anymore. It may have been still when you did your testing, and may still be on mirrors that are *very* slow to update. Anyway, I cannot recommend using the net boot method, as it is laregly untested. I also don't know what it's good for at all, frankly. I have been pondering remmoving it from the netinst CD entirely. - ext3 has vanished from the selection in conf.+mount filesystems Cannot reproduce. ext2, ext3, and reiserfs are all listed, and I have done installs with all of them used for the root filesystem today, using this image. I have successfully installed using this image on two computers a total of 12 times today.. Something went badly wrong, but I cannot find the problems in the image you say you used. Perhaps the CD you burnt is bad, or you accidentially swapped in one from Dec 30th, 2002? ;-) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
net.gz on cd image has netcfg-static and netcfg-dhcp?
It seems that the net.gz image on the netinst cd is some old and broken thing that includes netcfg-static and netcfg-dhcp instead of the new combined netcfg. If I build my own netboot initrd, I get one with the new netcfg in it. I downloaded netboot-initrd.gz from sjogren's daily builds, and it too has the old split netcfg packages. So I wonder what's wrong with the i386 daily build? Could Martin have forgotten to run cvs up lately? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
home page
I have a home page, and you had better take your home page off my computer beforeI call the Better Business Bureau! Who the hell do you think you are, installing this shit operating system on my computer without even asking me first? You'd better send me an e-mail how to get rid of you ASAP
Bug#222775: marked as done (pcmcia-udeb not loaded during CD install; pcmcia does work after install either)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line d-i pcmcia issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2003 02:14:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 02 20:14:17 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from h34-aclarke.sv.meer.net (ofb3.ofb.net) [205.217.153.34]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ARMWu-0005qc-00; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 20:14:16 -0600
Received: by ofb3.ofb.net (Postfix, from userid 1009)
id F0A112070212; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:14:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 21:14:15 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Attempt on Dell Latitude CSx -- PCMCIA NIC problems
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicholas Breen)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Version: daily netinst build 2003-11-20
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily netinst build from gluck, 2003-11-20
uname -a: Linux ephemeral 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2003-11-20
Method: Default ('cdrom') install - external CD-ROM drive, appears
as /dev/scd0
Machine: Dell Latitude CSx
Processor: PIII-500
Memory: 192 MB
Root Device: IDE hard disk, 12 GB (/dev/hda)
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/hda2 - 230MB - swap
/dev/hda5 - 25 MB - /boot (ext2)
/dev/hda6 - 6.6GB - / (reiserfs)
unused during installation:
/dev/hda1 - old suspend-to-disc partition (now unused), 214 MB
/dev/hda3 - isolated woody setup, 5.0 GB
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 03)
00:03.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1225 (rev 01)
00:03.1 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1225 (rev 01)
00:07.0 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 03)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Neomagic Corporation NM2360 [MagicMedia 256ZX]
01:00.1 Multimedia audio controller: Neomagic Corporation NM2360 [MagicMedia 256ZX
Audio]
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Xircom Cardbus Ethernet 10/100 (rev 03)
06:00.1 Serial controller: Xircom Cardbus Ethernet + 56k Modem (rev 03)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [E]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
The network card in this notebook is a Xircom RBEM56G-100 (PCMCIA),
requiring the xircom_cb module. Selecting this from the list failed
with a cannot detect your ethernet card error. 'lsmod' on vt2 showed
the module loaded, but not any of the other PCMCIA modules. (A brief
diversion was taken here to reset the keyboard map to American English,
due to #221932.) modprobe'ing yenta_socket and ds manually (which also
pulled in pcmcia_core) was necessary for the Ethernet interface to be
recognized.
Selecting 'none of the above' initially, loading yenta_socket and ds,
and then attempting network hardware detection also failed - the
installer mistakenly requested the tulip_cb module instead of xircom_cb.
All steps up to and including the reboot went flawlessly. However,
after reboot, the system was unable to continue installation, as none of
the PCMCIA modules had been installed.
--
Nicholas Breen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Received: (at 222775-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 04:30:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30
Re: XFS support in d-i
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:12:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: As I do appear to be making some progress on getting an XFS-enabled d-i image together, I thought I would give everyone a status update. The 2.4.22-based kernel-image packages are now sitting in the NEW queue; although no real support for these can reasonably be committed to d-i CVS until they've entered the archive, I've also posted the packages to http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/xfs/ so that people can begin working with them locally in the meantime. I expect to also have unofficial linux-kernel-di udebs together in the next couple of days, which I'll also make available there. That takes care of the kernel. The other key ingredient, of course, is d-i support for initializing new xfs-formatted partitions. If I'm reading the source to partconf right, all that's required for this is an xfsprogs udeb that provides the mkfs.xfs tool. I found some time over the holiday to put together a patch for xfsprogs to provide precisely that, which I will be submitting to the BTS tomorrow. A few more days should give me enough time to get initial XFS-enabled d-i images together for i386, at which point testing will be most appreciated. Status update after two days: The patch to xfsprogs to add support for udeb creation is now in the BTS (bug #225444). Most of the code to generate xfs kernel udebs and xfs d-i images for i386 has been committed to d-i CVS. The remaining bits that have not been committed are attached to this email; they can't be added until xfs kernel packages are available in the archive, since this would otherwise break d-i builds. Unofficial xfs kernel udebs, based on the pending kernel-image debs, have also been uploaded to http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/xfs/. A d-i CD-ready (in theory!) image is also now available as http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/xfs/cdrom-xfs-image.img (the bare initrd accompanies it at http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/d-i/xfs/cdrom-xfs-initrd.gz). I'm going to start looking at what it will take to build a debian-cd image now to pull this all together. Happy New Year, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Index: build/config/arch/linux-i386 === RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/build/config/arch/linux-i386,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 linux-i386 --- build/config/arch/linux-i38618 Dec 2003 12:36:41 - 1.15 +++ build/config/arch/linux-i38631 Dec 2003 01:18:03 - @@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ DOS_VOLUME_LABEL=Debian Inst # Currently only building on i386. -TYPES_SUPPORTED += demo floppy bootfloppy speakup access hd-media +TYPES_SUPPORTED += demo floppy bootfloppy speakup access hd-media cdrom-xfs Index: kernel/linux-kernel-di/kernel-versions === RCS file: /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/kernel/linux-kernel-di/kernel-versions,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -r1.15 kernel-versions --- kernel/linux-kernel-di/kernel-versions 28 Dec 2003 19:23:05 - 1.15 +++ kernel/linux-kernel-di/kernel-versions 31 Dec 2003 01:18:03 - @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ # arch version flavourinstallednamebuild-depends i386 2.4.22-1 3862.4.22-1-386 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386, kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.22-1-386 i386 2.4.22 speakup2.4.22-speakup kernel-image-2.4.22-speakup (= 2.4.22-2) +i386 2.4.22-xfs 386 2.4.22-xfs-386 kernel-image-2.4.22-xfs-386, kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.22-xfs-386 alpha2.4.22-1 generic2.4.22-1-generic kernel-image-2.4.22-1-generic m68k 2.4.20 amiga 2.4.20 kernel-image-2.4.20-amiga mips 2.4.22 r4k-ip22 2.4.22-r4k-ip22 kernel-image-2.4.22-r4k-ip22 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#221984: marked as done (dlink 660 pcmcia card not recognised on CD install; pcmcia-cs-udeb not loaded)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line d-i pcmcia issues has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2003 13:47:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 07:45:51 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0102.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.30] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ANBbb-0007J9-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:45:51 -0600 Received: from druuna.vipere.noire (AToulouse-105-1-32-12.w81-248.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.248.25.12]) by mwinf0102.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 10F741BFD3DA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:45:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from julie.vipere.noire (julie.vipere.noire [192.168.6.6]) by druuna.vipere.noire (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id OAA06249 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:44:58 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by julie.vipere.noire (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id hALDivgp001749 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:44:57 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:44:57 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Thomas Nemeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation reports Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-16 uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt Date: 2003-11-21 Method: - How did you install? Sarge netinst minimal CD 113 MB - What did you boot off? CDRom. - If network install, from where? Proxied? Network did not get recognised. Machine: Toshiba Satellite 300CDT Processor: p166 Memory: 80MB Root Device: ide (/dev/hda2) Root Size/partition table: Feel free to paste the full partition table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where. Output of lspci: Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [E] Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [0] Load installer modules: [0] Detect hard drives: [0] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: PCMCIA card (dlink 660) usually recognized as tulip_cb with potato didn't get recognized. Thomas --- Received: (at 222775-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 04:30:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 22:30:31 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbVz0-0003f8-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:21:14 -0600 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs19-176.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B7217E54 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:21:13 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DCEBC6E0EB; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: d-i pcmcia issues Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 X-Spam-Level: --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Bug#224644: marked as done (lost hostname entry, localhost)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#224644: fixed in netcfg 0.40 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2003 18:43:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 15 12:43:49 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tarnica.ctnet.pl [212.126.24.132] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AL5Oe-0003aO-00; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:43:48 -0600 Received: from miernik by tarnica.ctnet.pl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AL5OY-J7-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:43:42 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jan 'Miernik' Macek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation-reports: mostly successfill install, ide-scsi emulation made CD unaccessible, CD not bootable in _my_ drive X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:43:42 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: installation-reports Severity: normal *** install-report.template_20031109 Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-09 http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso 118,161,408 bytes uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 GNU/Linux Date: 2003-11-14 07:08 CET till 2003-11-15 13:15 CET Method: booting from sarge-i386-netinst in my standard IDE CD-ROM drive Machine: ASUS TX97-X Processor: Intel Pentium MMX 200 MHz Memory: 256 MB Root Device: /dev/hdb6 IBM IC35L040AVER07-0 (you should specify does name of device mean something like /dev/hdb6 or the model name of the hard drive) Root Size/partition table: Partition Table for /dev/hdb ---Starting--- EndingStart Number of # Flags Head Sect Cyl ID Head Sect Cyl SectorSectors -- - --- --- 1 0x00110 0x83 254 63 248 63 4000122 2 0x00000 0x00000 0 0 3 0x0001 313 0x05 254 63 1023 502834536820980 4 0x00000 0x00000 0 0 5 0x0011 313 0x83 254 63 1023 6332001417 6 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 128519 7 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 2088449 8 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 2088449 9 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 514079 localhost:~# df -Tm FilesystemType 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hdb6 ext2 613920 67% / /dev/hdb9 ext2 244 1 231 1% /tmp /dev/hdb7 ext31004 106 848 12% /usr /dev/hdb8 reiserfs102042 979 5% /var /dev/hda7 ext2 306 24545 85% /home /dev/hda1 ext2 6255 4 95% /mnt Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430TX - 82439TX MTXC (rev 01) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01) 00:01.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) 00:01.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) 00:01.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01) 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 00:0c.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. ViRGE/DX or /GX (rev 01) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[E] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Initial boot worked:[E] This CD didn't want to boot in my CD-ROM drive at all. It acts exactly as if there was no CD in the drive).
Bug#218870: marked as done (needs to install kernel-pcmcia-modules-xxx for i386)
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:57:38 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2003 05:26:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 02 23:26:23 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AGXEM-0003PR-00; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 23:26:22 -0600 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs13-144.access.naxs.com [216.98.93.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A02180AD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 3 Nov 2003 05:26:21 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06FF66EAA8; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:45:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:45:44 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: needs to install kernel-pcmcia-modules-xxx for i386 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: kernel-installer Severity: normal Tags: d-i kernel-installer seems the only possible place to install the pcmcia modules package for the installed kernel.=20 It only need be installed if pcmcia support is installed. There are two ways to go. It could look to see if target has pcmcia-cs installed in it. Or it could look to see if apt-install has been used to install pcmcia-cs into target. (hw-detect takes care of getting pcmcia-cs installed in target on systems with pcmcia). AFAIK, only i386 has a pcmcia modules package separate from the kernel. --=20 see shy jo --- Received: (at 218870-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 2003 04:35:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 30 22:35:00 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AbVz0-0003f5-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:21:14 -0600 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs19-176.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111AB17DFB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:21:13 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AED0C6E197; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:57:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:57:38 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29 X-Spam-Level: --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is done. --=20 see shy jo --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/8i0Sd8HHehbQuO8RAjYYAKDroU0sPIqKMhADfbU+fxAmJrZvsQCg2Ehf moVmYsVX7Yzog49pJUrCDgo= =HUsG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
