Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
FWIW, this was a straight forward multi-To field email message addressed to both lists. If there is a way I can improve the announce/release automation, I am happy to do so. Maybe a better way is to send multiple messages? -- Daniel Ruggeri On September 25, 2018 7:12:25 PM EDT, William A Rowe

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ne < 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 9B4B1E1B I've also added Craig here as he was unable to find the message sent to announce@a.o - with luck, these won't vanish, but at least this time I have the message IDs... -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-24 16:59, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Yes, I sent

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
pache and for mismatched SPF records. > > > >On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:16 AM Daniel Ruggeri >wrote: > >> Hi, all; >>I sent the announce message for 2.4.35, but haven't received it >myself. >> I didn't get errors sending that I am aware of. Perh

Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; I sent the announce message for 2.4.35, but haven't received it myself. I didn't get errors sending that I am aware of. Perhaps it is in moderation? If not, I can check in with infra to see if mail-relay.a.o ate it. Thanks -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r29575 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Ah, yes - good point. We even just talked about that topic at the board meeting this week. I'll nuke those and update the scripts to not generate them any more. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/21/2018 11:27 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > You may want to use this opportunity to drop md5 and sha

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T&R 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ished. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/19/2018 5:54 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:19:10AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:43 AM Joe Orton wrote: >>> You'll likely see issues testing against OpenSSL 1.1.1 until the TLSv1.3 >>> m

RESULT: Passed - [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
rocess. I will also plan to RM a followup release as promised now that the TLS 1.3 change has been merged... but let's give that a few weeks for other features to make it into 2.4.x :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/17/2018 7:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below th

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
around this if you're so inclined :-) Thanks! -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/21/2018 5:59 AM, Steffen wrote: > Maybe I overlook it: > > I miss in the change log: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=1840546 > > Looks it needs special w

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
.6.1" iconv: "1.2.2" brotli: "1.0.6" nghttp2: "1.33.0" zlib: "1.2.11" pcre: "8.42" libxml2: "2.9.8" php: "5.6.38" lua: "5.3.5" curl: "7.61.1" On 2018-09-17 19:56, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Wow - that's actually really cool! Thanks for sharing - would love to see a HOWTO. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-19 14:59, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T&R 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 9/17/2018 2:20 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 17.09.2018 um 20:59 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: >> Hi, all; >>     I have been delayed executing the automation because the test >> suite seems to be hanging for me. This appears to be consistently >> during t/ssl/varlookup.t

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T&R 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
reported start at test 35 with err "Failed test 35 in t/ssl/varlookup.t at line 109 fail #35" and continue to 83. If anyone has experience with this area of the test suite, pointers definitely welcome. Otherwise, I'll start poking at it. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-17 10:01, Danie

NOTICE: Intent to T&R 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
by then. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: 2.4.35 in Sept?

2018-09-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
doing so. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-13 14:24, William A Rowe Jr wrote: I'm unaware of anything blocking a tag today, if someone wants to proceed. What is gained by waiting a few days to slip in another rushed patch to break yet another release?  I see nothing in STATUS necessary to fix 2

Re: Run httpd's testsuite

2018-09-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the server with all modules (--with-modules=reallyall, if memory serves me correctly), you would see many more tests run. Also, do not be alarmed if the test suite doesn't take a full night to run. That is also normal :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On September 2, 2018 5:49:46 AM CDT, Danesh D

Re: 2.4.35 in Sept?

2018-08-31 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, Dennis; We took a look at that a year-ish ago, but couldn't find critical mass to release the produced candidate. Are there things in trunk you are particularly interested in? -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 31, 2018 8:29:04 AM MST, Dennis Clarke wrote: >On 08/31/2018 02:40

Re: Time for 2.4.34?

2018-07-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
h the ASF relays, announcements generated by the scripts may not be delivered. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1832580 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c

2018-05-31 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
e. Based on the context, I am guessing you've detected the config struct is created and set twice, thus losing potential parameters. If that's the case, I'm confident removing the second occurrence should be fine. -- Daniel Ruggeri On May 31, 2018 7:54:37 AM CDT, Yann Ylavic wrote: &g

Re: 2.4.34 release

2018-05-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
I'm game for doing a T&R today and running the vote through Sunday (since I'm out of town starting tomorrow) if we're ready. Fellow devs? -- Daniel Ruggeri On May 29, 2018 10:42:56 AM CDT, "." wrote: >Hey everyone, > > When can we expect a release of 2

Re: slotmem + balancer

2018-05-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Thanks, Yann;    This does help explain the rationale and I appreciate you taking the time to walk us through the reasoning. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 5/20/2018 3:59 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:19 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I am under the impression is that we shou

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
we break the contract that would state "Any configuration valid in 3.4.x will always be valid in 3.4.x." We can't do that today, but it would be great if we could. Adding directives only in a minor bump provides a clean point at which a known set of directives are valid. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
e already been expressed. For its faults and virtues, at least the test framework is in a single language. I suspect most of us can figure out what other languages are doing, so maybe it's not a big deal... WDYT? -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 24, 2018 7:50:18 AM CDT, Jim Jagielski wrote: >On

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On April 24, 2018 6:53:52 AM CDT, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > >On 04/24/2018 01:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> >> >> On April 24, 2018 1:38:26 AM CDT, "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -Ursprüngliche

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On April 23, 2018 11:30:07 AM CDT, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Ruggeri >wrote: >> >> The more I think about it, the more I *really* like a semver-ish >> approach where major represents the ABI that will not be broken, >minor &g

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
;So 2.4.36 would contain the additional features / improvements we had >in 2.4.35 as well, but they >have been in the "wild" for some time and the issues should have been >identified and fixed as part >of 2.4.36. >Users would then have a choice what to take. > >Regards > >Rüdiger Interesting idea. This idea seems to be converging on semver-like principles where the double release would look like: 2.12.4 => 2.12.3 + fixes 2.13.0 => 2.12.4 + features ... which I like as a direction. However, I think distinguishing between patch/feature releases in the patch number alone would be confusing to the user base. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
backported unless it also involves some changes to the Perl test framework or some pretty convincing reasons why it's not required. I completely support creating this as a procedure, provided we tackle the "how do I test stuff" doco challenges, too. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
know what's in the build so don't have to do such gymnastics). In the same vein of thought, if it is disruptive to a config, that signals a minor bump. Patch changes must be forward compatible. -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 22, 2018 12:32:24 PM CDT, Eric Covener wrote: >On Sun, Apr 2

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the issues managing several branches. (I really am digging this idea :-) I'm glad folks have proposed it...) -- Daniel Ruggeri On 4/20/2018 12:08 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Let me counter with this... Rather than break the API every m.n > release, what if we roll on to 2.6 with no

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
all should be released/disclosed at the same time). -- Daniel Ruggeri On 4/19/2018 7:17 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I don't disagree with RC's entirely, or the mechanism you suggest, but > that isn't what I read as proposed. > > Our issue is that every httpd must be di

Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
where we should ship a release sooner. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 4/19/2018 8:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > One of the great things about working on open source is that > one is NOT burdened by schedules. That releases are done > "when ready" not when some artificial schedule or so

Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
$TAG '' httpd-2.4 $TAG 'drugg...@primary.net' ./push.sh . $TAG dev #Wait for vote ./push.sh . $TAG dist #Wait for mirrors ./announce.sh $TAG 'drugg...@apache.org' 'Daniel Ruggeri' The only hangup so far is when we merge in security fixes right before announce -

Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
to the URL for latest and greatest: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/config.layout As we love to say, "patches welcome!" Feel free to just submit your diff here (since dev@ IS the power that be) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: "Most Popular Web Server?"

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the interest of module authors rather than the folks who choose which webserver to use. > And finally, when the vast majority of web servers nowadays live > *behind* proxy servers, these type of metric surveys are meaningless. > Of course, I feel that this was nginx and MS' plan all along: they > knew how things were changing and wanted to win the "proxy server > market"... all that should be pretty obvious w/ 20/20 hindsight. -- Daniel Ruggeri

So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ersation is that we're happy (or maybe just content) with the SSL merging fixes and we should prep to ship 2.4.34 as a fix. Does anyone disagree? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs

2018-04-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
This is a pretty valid reason to consider 2.5. However, I'm not convinced trunk has fixed the funky things referred to in this thread either. -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 14, 2018 2:16:04 AM CDT, Stefan Eissing wrote: > >> Am 13.04.2018 um 16:00 schrieb Joe Orton : >> >

Re: URL's in error pages

2018-04-12 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
erence on trunk. -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 12, 2018 6:46:35 AM CDT, Eric Covener wrote: >Scanners at $dayjob (and reports on security@) frequently report that >built-in error documents suffer from non-xss HTML injection from the >request URL. > >Here are a few options to

Re: ab issues (just on macOS?)

2018-04-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
That's interesting. Does your machine bind on both IPv6 and IPv4? I would assume just v4 and you have a localhost as ::1 in your hosts file. Is that the case? -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 9, 2018 4:43:42 PM CDT, Jim Jagielski wrote: >OK... if I change the test to use 127.0.0.1 in

Re: ab issues (just on macOS?)

2018-04-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
it should point out why your machine may be having problems (I don't have a way to test this on macOS). I *DID* see some strange behavior on my Linux box in that open3 munged both STDERR and STDOUT into a single stream... which is very unexpected. -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: svn commit: r1827623 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext

2018-03-26 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
lines (r1827743). -- Daniel Ruggeri > -Original Message- > From: Eric Covener > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 6:41 AM > To: Apache HTTP Server Development List > Cc: c...@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1827623 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext > >

RE: svn commit: r25871 - /release/httpd/docs/

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Is this something I could do as part of the push to the dist release mirrors? I have a script that handles the tarballs and doap updates so far. I'm also working on one that will also gather details and prep announcements if we should push these updates at that time. -- Daniel Ru

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of pushing the release out to the mirrors today. Cheers! -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018/03/17 23:43:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > ... > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > ... > +1 for the following test: system: kernel: name: Linux release: 3.16.0-4-amd64 version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1 (2016-12-30)

Re: Introduction

2018-03-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
crypt related, I believe my name even appears in the changelog... Cheers, Bernard Spil. Well met. Welcome, Bernard. Thanks for stopping in to say hi :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

2018-03-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
e3 *httpd-2.4.33.tar.gz sha256: cd34636caf03c9a897ddfc928fc866c965f23d909b9612880563a7ad0d1a7e5b *httpd-2.4.33.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

[NOTICE] T&R of 2.4.33 imminent

2018-03-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; I will be doing the tag and roll of 2.4.33 very soon (2ish hours). I am on mobile so haven't reviewed STATUS since yesterday during the day - now would be a great time for votes and backports just before bundling it all up :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri

[NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd-2.4.33 in the next few days

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
o so. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ending the announcement as noted on private@, but I think I'd sooner T&R 2.4.33 and get ready for that one to go out. Again, I volunteer... assuming y'all haven't come to the opinion that I'm cursed as an RM. -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: William A Rowe Jr > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:28 PM > To: httpd > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri > wrote: > > > > *** Changes here > >

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: Rainer Jung > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Ruggeri > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:00 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > Hi, all; > > On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > > Hi, all

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
forward to his report on votes ... Regards, Joe -- Daniel Ruggeri

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days t

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Thanks, Steffen; Do you have a degree of confidence to record a vote on the release one way or the other? -- Daniel Ruggeri On March 13, 2018 8:25:35 AM CDT, Steffen wrote: > >For testing available at >www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36581#36581 > >Attention. &g

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball a

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
0 *httpd-2.4.32.tar.gz sha256: 11cd0c43135ffe89706d0558abc0d19cb4a1f203e11ada52f2e1c3f790959300 *httpd-2.4.32.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd-2.4.32 in the next few days

2018-03-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Nice work on STATUS! I plan to proceed within the next few hours unless there are any sudden emergencies. -- Daniel Ruggeri > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Ruggeri > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 8:49 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [NOTICE] Intent to T

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

2018-03-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-03-05 10:31, Joe Orton wrote: On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:56:50AM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this

[NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd-2.4.32 in the next few days

2018-03-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; Third time's a charm, eh? After the fix for ab went in this past weekend, I'd like to propose another T&R with the included fix to be done Friday or Saturday. If there is no opposition, I will proceed after a few-hours-notice is shared with the list. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1825777 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/style/version.ent include/ap_release.h

2018-03-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ry 19, 2018, not released. 2.4.29 : Tagged on October 17, 2017. Released on October 23, 2017. 2.4.28 : Tagged on September 25, 2017. Released on October 5, 2017. Indeed - corrected in r1825905. Thanks -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

2018-03-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 5:09 PM > To: httpd-dev > Subject: Re: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31) > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Ruggeri > wrote: &

RE: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

2018-03-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
give the error message to STDERR. Perhaps we should add to the test suite that `ab -q` completed against the http and https vshosts with no lines printed to STDERR and has a 0 exit code? -- Daniel Ruggeri > -Original Message- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com

[RESULT] Release httpd-2.4.31

2018-03-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
As RM, I am not comfortable releasing this with the bug discovered in ab. As such, I'm calling this one dead-on-the-vine and version 2.4.31 will not be released. -- Daniel Ruggeri From: Daniel Ruggeri [mailto:drugg...@primary.net] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2018 9:57 AM To

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

2018-03-03 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
t's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. -- Daniel Ruggeri

NOTICE: T&R of 2.4.31 in a few hours

2018-03-03 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; STATUS is looking good so as the subject says, I will be doing a T&R of 2.4.31 very soon. Likely in the next hour or two rather than waiting until noon. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Propsed T&R of 2.4.31 this weekend

2018-02-28 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
d if there is no opposition to this proposal. Cheers! -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

2018-02-28 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
t's good enough! > > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > -- > > Daniel Ruggeri > > > >

RE: svn commit: r1825219 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh

2018-02-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
erent tact. -- Daniel Ruggeri > -Original Message- > From: drugg...@apache.org [mailto:drugg...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2018 5:39 AM > To: c...@httpd.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1825219 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh > > Author: drugger

RE: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/

2018-02-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
/svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools > > Sorry about that - for some reason I hadn't yet pushed them upstream. Just pushed in r1824887 (tag.sh and push.sh). -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/

2018-02-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:rpl...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:34 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1824751 [1/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ > docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/ include/ > > > > On 02/19/2018 03:18

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018/02/15 13:49:01, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > As mentioned before, I actually want to RM, but am still waiting for *any* > > confirmation that the dead-on-the-vine 2.6 release I bundled is at least > > str

Re: T&R of 2.4.30 Proposal

2018-02-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
note, the slotmem fix seems like a showstopper, right? I'd want to see that in before a T&R. -- Daniel Ruggeri On February 14, 2018 7:22:02 AM CST, Jim Jagielski wrote: >I propose a T&R of 2.4.30 on Feb 19th. I offer to RM >unless someone else would like to do so.

Re: 2.4.x STATUS needs you!

2017-12-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
#x27;ve been poking at this particular patch for about a year now and have a short attention span. Hopefully enough feedback and work can be done soon to get *someone* comfortable enough for another +1. -- Daniel Ruggeri On December 13, 2017 6:19:43 AM CST, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

2017-12-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
tying it all together with an automated build plan. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/7/2017 8:36 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >    Please find the proposed 2.5.0-alpha release tarballs and signatures > at the following location. This release candidate was tagged from trunk >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

2017-11-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
result: log: system: kernel: name: release: version: machine: libraries: libxyz: Feedback on anything else I should be capturing is welcome. This is the only surviving artifact of the build and test since it's all done in ephemeral docker containers. On 2017-11-07

Re: Research volunteers needed

2017-11-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Count me in. I'm traveling a bit this time of year, but am happy to help. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 11/24/2017 7:53 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > I'm sure many of you know Dawn Foster. She keynoted Apachecon for us > in Denver. > > She's looking for several volunteers from

Re: PHP test cases

2017-11-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 11/22/2017 11:55 AM, Jose Kahan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 04:31:57PM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Also, t/php/getlastmod.t fails because of a warning[2] unless php.ini >> has been set to explicitly declare a timezone (unsure of which version >> PHP made this

PHP test cases

2017-11-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
hp.ini on the fly but we ought to handle this better in the code. Side note... t/filter/case.t fails unless perl documentation is installed. We should note this or pick a better file :-) [1] http://php.net/manual/en/features.safe-mode.php [2] http://php.net/manual/en/function.date.php#refsect1

[VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

2017-11-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh [2] http://people.apache.org/~druggeri/scripts/ [3] http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html P.S. I'll be in Dublin next week if anyone would like to catch up! -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
rsation alpha1, alpha2, etc just meant x.y.z+1-alpha since it was much easier to type that than all the dots on my tiny little on-screen mobile keyboard -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
l cut. If we decide later before Alpha2 that we should have branched, we could easily svn copy the tag directory to a branch directory before proceeding or branch from the post-tag commit where MMN for "next" is bumped. -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: Ra

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
w evening (roughly 24 hours from the time I sent this message) as a first whack at the process. This first run will be the first full execution of the script to do the tagging and prepping for next version. After that I'll move on to other parts of the release process (seems like release.sh is rather complete) and, of course, documentation updates as needed. P.S. Resending to dev list -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.5.0-alpha

2017-11-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
es users report things or we come across it in our own testing? -- Daniel Ruggeri P.S. Resending to dev list  On 11/4/2017 5:46 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > I have a question for you about how do we plan to collect/list the > 'known issues' in trunk, in order to address them properly

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.5.0-alpha

2017-11-03 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
unity. When 2.5 is API/ABI solidified, trunk gets branched (svn copy) to 2.6 to live on as a stable branch. Then, trunk gets a bump up to 2.7. -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: Jacob Perkins Sent: November 2, 2017 11:39:59 AM CDT To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re:

DISCUSS: Establishing a release cadence

2017-11-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
icked off the process and committed their free time to doing it. The other thought is to help provide some degree of regularity our community (users and devs alike) can come to expect as well as do whatever we can to easily get experimental trunk bits in peoples' hands for testing. Thoughts? -- Daniel Ruggeri

[NOTICE] Intent to T&R 2.5.0-alpha

2017-11-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the door we'll be in a good spot with some scripts and as minimal-as-possible manual procedures. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Simplify download distribution directory by dropping sha1 hashes?

2017-10-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
+1 -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: William A Rowe Jr Sent: October 23, 2017 1:36:31 PM CDT To: httpd Subject: Simplify download distribution directory by dropping sha1 hashes? HTTPD team, Since our downloads are to be authenticated by their .asc PGP signatures

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

2017-09-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the field (and have answered with a 301 to the CHANGES file). -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: Eric Covener Sent: September 29, 2017 7:16:51 AM CDT To: Apache HTTP Server Development List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM

Re: SSLPolicy

2017-08-04 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
would need to be loaded to take advantage of the macros we define. Surely some autoconf magics could be used that say 'if mod_macro and mod_ssl are compiled, render this set of macros in the ssl section.' -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: Luca Toscano Sent: A

An ask for eyes on proposal

2017-06-08 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
eers -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: HTTP/2 and no-longer "experimental"

2017-05-31 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
+1! -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: Jim Jagielski Sent: May 31, 2017 7:07:21 AM CDT To: httpd-dev Subject: HTTP/2 and no-longer "experimental" There was discussion some time ago about dropping the "experimental" tag from our HTTP/2 implement

Re: SSL and Usability and Safety

2017-05-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ne numbers in error messages. -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: Jacob Champion Sent: May 2, 2017 5:48:34 PM CDT To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: SSL and Usability and Safety On 05/02/2017 02:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > I think to be useful, reasonable SSL def

Re: backport proposals

2017-04-27 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Which reminds me... How about that cool proxy protocol patch? Anyone want to give it a whirl? ;-) -- Daniel Ruggeri Original Message From: Jim Jagielski Sent: April 27, 2017 9:55:39 AM CDT To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: backport proposals Yeah... sometimes it is

Re: svn commit: r1790170 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-04-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ProxyProtocolDisableNetworks/RemoteIPProxyProtocolExceptions/g operation. Thanks! I've updated the backport proposal to include your note as well as the 2.4 convenience patch. @wrowe - I think the updated proposal addresses the concerns around the optional processing. Would love if you can spare a few cycles before the upcoming 2.4.26 to review and offer your +1 or at least nyx the -.5 note in case that's deterring others. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: mod_remoteip and mod_http2 combined

2017-04-01 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 4/1/2017 11:18 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> I went with the directive name >> RemoteIPProxyProtocolDisableHosts to align more with the fact that a >> single host or range c

Re: mod_remoteip and mod_http2 combined

2017-04-01 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
of updating the backport proposal. To be safe, I'm removing @jim's vote given how many times the code has changed since he reviewed and will put it back in the "active" section of STATUS. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 4/1/2017 8:17 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Agreed - as many times as

Re: mod_remoteip and mod_http2 combined

2017-04-01 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ng. I hope to have a patch later this morning to share. As awful as the name is, I'm thinking RemoteIPProxyProtocolDisableNetworks ARG1 ARG2 ARG3. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 3/29/2017 4:43 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > This is the gist of my remaining objections. > > It would be nice

Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-03-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 3/13/2017 7:31 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> On 2/20/2017 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Ruggeri >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, Bill; >>>>

Re: svn commit: r1783256 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2017-03-11 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2/20/2017 10:58 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, Bill; >>I've replied about the pre_connnection situation - hoping someone can >> give the proposed patch a test as I don't have a handy H2 testbed.

Re: mod_remoteip and mod_http2 combined

2017-03-11 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Thanks, all, for the patience as I finally got back to this. On 2/24/2017 11:05 AM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: > > On 02/20/2017 07:48 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >>> On 2017-02-15 09:07 (-0600), William A Rowe Jr wrote

<    1   2   3   4   5   >