Is anyone working on embedding Tomcat in Geronimo?
I would like to help out and tackle this issue.
Any helpful information would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jeff Genender
Getting errors from the assemble module:
jar:jar:
assemble:
[echo] /Users/powerbook/Projects/geronimo
[echo] Preprocessing client-system-plan.xml
[echo] Preprocessing default-database-plan.xml
[echo] Preprocessing deployer-system-plan.xml
[echo] Preprocessing
One of the first things I am going to take on in integrating Tomcat is
the Geronimo JAAS integration.
So...I wanted to bounce a few questions off you guys, and with being a
new comer to the Geronimo project, I am probably going to ask a few n00b
Geronimo questions, so I apologize in advance.
This is good...this should get the raw Tomcat JAASRealm to work for
authorization. I just coded up a special JAASTomcatRealm that called
the ContextManager.getServerSideSubject and now I can ditch it since it
looks like the JaasLoginCoordinator is populating the subject.
Aaron..good
) throws LoginException;
+public Collection serverLoginModuleCommit(JaasClientId
userIdentifier, int loginModuleIndex) throws LoginException;
/**
* Indicates that the overall login succeeded. All login modules
that were
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Jeff Genender wrote
to the caller. In the long term,
we'd like to adjust the interface between Tomcat and Geronimo to use a
different authorization method, which will mean the RealmPrincipals are no
longer necessary.
Aaron
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok, then this is my mistake. I assumed you were
Corba 3.0.2 Spec is here:
http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/corba_iiop.htm
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Also does anyone have a URL to the spec? I personally would find it
convent to have a link in the files and in the Notice file.
-dain
On Jan 26, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr
Jules,
You hit the nail on the head. At my current client, I just got done
implementing Spring ApplicationContext objects into JNDI that are
managed via JMX MBeans, so separate applications could share the POJOs
between themselves. This proved to be huge when we are getting Portlets
that
?
TIA
Anita
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
.
**/
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
this is not a requirement to get Tomcat integrated, it would be
a nice-to-have for consistency sake.
IMHO, once we get that builder completed, Tomcat should be considered
fully integrated.
Jeff
TIA
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita,
I think this is now rectified for you.
First
David Jencks wrote:
On Feb 11, 2005, at 7:29 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jeff,
why do we need to use the TomcatModuleBuilder(TMB)
in j2ee-deployer-plan.xml ?
Actually, I just left it in there because A) There is a Jetty
Webbuilder version in there, and also for the sake
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Jeff,
why do we need to use the
TomcatModuleBuilder(TMB)
in j2ee-deployer-plan.xml ?
Actually, I just left it in there because A) There
is a Jetty Webbuilder
version in there, and also
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Oops! I apologize for the keyboard malfunction. Please
ignore my other mail.
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
the jetty like webapp classloader would not work.
Thanks for the info., I
for this.
Regards
Anita
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
Do we really want to comment out the test for alpha software? I can
look at the changes between 5.5.7 and 5.5.8 and see the differences.
Jeff
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jacek,
Does this work in 5.5.7?
Well, I think so. Noone reported any troubles since 5.5.7 upgrade. I'm
Do we want to do this with
javax.security.jacc.PolicyConfigurationFactory.provider also?
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Actually it kind of does. Setting the policyProvider attribute in
the SecurityServiceImpl plan will do it.
The question is, do we pick up
should be
behaving as a delegating Policy provider as described in Section
2.5 of the JACC spec. If this is the case, it should be documented
on the Wiki / installation instructions (also see last paragraph of
section 2.5).
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
Yes...we will depend on the jar.
Jeff
Hari Kodungallur wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed that ActiveMQ moved from CVS to SVN. So I looked at
geronimo's latest maven.xml and ActiveMQ checkout has been removed. So,
I just wanted to know whether we just depend on the ActiveMQ jar file
instead of building
I am interested.
Jeff
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Geronimo Developers,
I shot an email out to the YourKit folks to see about getting a license
for their most excellent profiler. Seems like the are willing to give us
free licenses. Who interested, and would there be problem with dropping
a link to
Mark,
If that doesn't work, try Tor:
http://tor.eff.org/
This one gets by most corporate firewalls...but not all.
Jeff
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Mark,
For more native ssh client, try putty. You can get a windows installer
for it at:
+1...alot of people have commented on this, so this would be good.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
(From a tangential discussion on pmc@, this came up and Alan noted this
would be better discussed here, so I'm just moving it here)
It's been 5 months since the M3 milestone release, and a
It does not look like my comments got out to the lists...so here they are:
FIXED. Moved the commons-modeler to cvs.apache.org/repository.
Jeff Genender (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-619?page=history ]
Jeff Genender reassigned GERONIMO-619
corporate
legal.
BTW, if you need any help explaining or discussing, let us know. We've
been through this before with other companies.
geir
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
dependencies can also be removed entirely.
Any thoughts, objections, or additional stuff that could be cleaned up?
--
Jeremy
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
Cabrera,
Jeff Genender and I have come up with a design we think will satisfy all the
requirements and considerably simplify the code. Since I'm in the westernmost
time zone I got elected to document it :-) So, I'll try to describe it here
and expect to start implementing it shortly
it ;-)
Jeff
John
Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/05/2005 02:20:08 PM:
I have finally implemented the Valve chains to the Tomcat integration
and finalized the context configuration. I would suffice to say Tomcat
is pretty much/mostly integrated into Geronimo (short of major
for pointing this out.
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Great work!
Thanks!
In your the example SSL configuration in
geronimo\modules\assembly\src\plan\j2ee-server-tomcat-plan.xml , the
connector attributes minProcessor and maxProcessor have been
deprecated (according
semination, use or reliance upon this information
by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this
e-mail are those of the author personally.
Jeff Genender
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09-May-2005 12:56 PM
Hi anita,
The DebugConsole seems to be working for me...
I'll try a fresh checkout and see if I get that.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: anita kulshreshtha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 6:12 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: More Tomcat Updates
Anita,
Can you be more specific in your question? Are you saying you want a Tomcat
log to go to another log file?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: anita kulshreshtha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 3:07 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Logging in Tomcat
Jeff
level logs from
tomcat to geronimo.log and DEBUG level logs to a
separate file. Digester produces too much output and
it is hard to sift through the logs.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita,
Can you be more specific in your question? Are you
saying you want a Tomcat
Lamote
Belgium
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
+1000. Sign me up.
David Blevins wrote:
...now that I have your attention :) More importantly, who is willing to volunteer to test and
give a works or doesn't work report?
Any volunteers? Consider this the signup sheet.
-David
--
Jeff Genender
http://geronimo.apache.org
-only version is a great idea. Lets get some more input on this
subject..
Stefan Arentz wrote:
On May 26, 2005, at 5:39 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi Philippe,
We are currently working towards an official release, so thanks for
inquiring. However, in the mean time, you are welcome
tomcat-log4j.properties file just like
jetty, deployer and client. I will be glad to submit
the code.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita,
I believe a log4j configuration should allow you to
do what you want.
You should be able to control certain packages (i.e.
Digester
Hi Tom,
I investigated your patches...
For the JAASJettyRealm, I altered your patches slightly. I changed the
isUserInRole to test if the user or role is null and return false if so.
Tomcat handles it this way. Thanks for the heads up on this.
The empty String for a role should be caught
The unstable release or the source code is the closest to M4...use that
for now.
Jeff
sanjaya gayan wrote:
Is the M4 not available for download?
sanjaya.
- Original Message -
From: Thushantha De Alwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 2:38 PM
. I also think we should have a
separate tomcat-log4j.properties file just like
jetty, deployer and client. I will be glad to submit
the code.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita,
I believe a log4j configuration should allow you to
do what you want.
You should be able
Brian K. Wallace wrote:
~ 1. Assuming the whole of Geronimo passes the TCK, what can be said of
a 'minimal' Geronimo? Is it able to claim anything with regard to the TCK?
TCK is all or nothing. You pass all tests or you don't pass
certification. A minimal Geronimo would clearly be a
.
I hope that was less confuusing.
Jeff Genender wrote:
Brian K. Wallace wrote:
~ 1. Assuming the whole of Geronimo passes the TCK, what can be said of
a 'minimal' Geronimo? Is it able to claim anything with regard to the
TCK?
TCK is all or nothing. You pass all tests or you don't pass
Its getting close to the big event...
Should we be thinking about a small Geronimo get-together for some beers?
I hear the IBM guys are celebrating by buying a night of libations (j/k)!
It would be great to meet everyone.
Should we plan a place and meeting time?
Jeff
, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 5/28/2005 5:32 PM:
On May 28, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Its getting close to the big event...
Should we be thinking about a small Geronimo get-together for some
beers?
How about a big Geronimo get together for some
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On May 28, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I think I wrote something a little confusing...let me clarify...
What we do to a subset of Geronimo has impact on the whether it
passes. However if Geronimo passes the TCK, then a subset would
include
I'll start...here are a few...
1) A nice usable, and polished management console.
2) A GUI configuration tool that allows you to add/remove components,
where the result is a set of plans with your custom configuration. (No
more XML hacking for the newbies out there).
3) True clustering (I
+1 Cert first.
David Blevins wrote:
We are having a lot of great discussion which should continue. I do want to
make sure we are getting somewhere, so let's all vote that we at least agree on
one form of stability; certification. Probably obvious, but one step toward
inching our way to
Cross pollination...interesting set of terms. This evokes some really
bad thoughts ;-)
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Has anyone tried the Geronimo support for Eclipse Web Tools (http://
www.eclipse.org/webtools/development/news/geronimo.html)?
I would appreciate and I'm sure the web tools team
it is time to separate the talkers from the doers.
-dain
On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Jeff,
All I'm saying is I don't care if IBM puts up
http://www.ibm.com/wasce/plugins, I also don't care if you put up a
http://virtuas.com/geronimo/plugins site
+1
David Blevins wrote:
Everyone, please read and ACK.
On Jun 14, 2006, at 4:31 PM, John Sisson wrote:
Hiram, I care if a private or commercial entity has control over the
default option.
I think Hiram does too, he just a read a little too fast. His thoughts
are clear though.
On
+1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
A request was sent to the PMC to add a book to the website. I have
created a patch for this and tested the changes.
See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2122 for details and
patch for for site\trunk and site\branches\may2006.
+1 with emphasis. :)
David Blevins wrote:
+1 from me!
-David
On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I have created what I hope is the final release of Geronimo 1.1.
There has been a lot of work that has gone into this release (please
review the RELEASE-NOTES).
+1...very acceptable. Thanks for taking on 1.1.1. Matt...I know its a
tremendous amount of work. I would be happy to lend a hand.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Here is my proposal for defining the exit criteria for this release
stream. I would like to volunteer to lead the 1.1.1 release.
2.0-M5 has...its on ibiblio...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I can't seem to build this. It looks like it needs spring 2.0.0-m5
which has not been released.
Regards,
Alan
Hey community,
I just wanted to pass a note that some of us are working on the
geronimo-cache which is a first-pass at clustering in the sandbox:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/geronimo-cache/
Its the beginning of a full replication implementation...its a start. I
would like
Stefan Arentz wrote:
On 6/17/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey community,
I just wanted to pass a note that some of us are working on the
geronimo-cache which is a first-pass at clustering in the sandbox:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/geronimo-cache/
Its
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/17/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to pass a note that some of us are working on the
geronimo-cache which is a first-pass at clustering in the sandbox:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/geronimo-cache/
Its the beginning
jaxb2 maven plugin? I can fix it (since I am the author) ;-) or are
you referring to the jaxb1 plugin from java.net?
Jeff
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
2.0-M5 has...its on ibiblio...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I can't seem to build this. It looks like it needs spring 2.0.0
,
Alan
Jeff Genender wrote:
jaxb2 maven plugin? I can fix it (since I am the author) ;-) or are
you referring to the jaxb1 plugin from java.net?
Jeff
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
2.0-M5 has...its on ibiblio...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I can't seem to build
+1 great idea Paul.
Paul McMahan wrote:
There's an interesting plugin site for eclipse at
eclipseplugincentral.com that implements some of the ideas we have
discussed. It provides a directory of plugins but not the actual
files themselves, pointing elsewhere for the purchase/download. It
Congrats Joe!
Sachin Patel wrote:
In recognition of his contributions to the Apache Geronimo community,
the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership of Joe Bohn.
Joe has contributed in many areas, including the console and as of
recent, the work on our minimal distributions.
Mulder
Bruce Snyder
Dain Sundstrom
David Jencks
Hernan Cunico
Hiram R. Chirino
James Strachan
Jason Dillon
Jeff Genender
Jeremy Boynes
Kevan Miller
Mark DeLaFranier
Simone Bordot
Srinath Perera
Paul McMahan wrote:
Liferay is an open source portal made available under the MIT license.
They provide a geronimo+liferay distribution from their website,
which is basically a zipped up geronimo/tomcat server with liferay
already deployed. I had some problems starting a fresh install of
Aaron Mulder wrote:
One is that you can declare a database pool dependency named
LiferayDatabase or whatever. Then provide a Derby database pool
plugin with that name. If the user creates a custom database pool
named LiferayDatabase then the Liferay plugin will map to that,
whatever it
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/21/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personal preference...but I think its better throwing an error. Is
obsoleting a settable option? I am not so sure I like obsoleting by
default...this could be ugly since it may be another app other than the
Welcome app
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I was not swayed by the arguments against letting people deploy Quartz
jobs as GBeans. However, I agree that it's not appropriate for every
case. When I document this plugin, I plan to list the use cases I'm
going for and the ones I'm not.
I don't think people had
I like it ;-)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
A few days ago I had made a comment about Open for g-Business. Any
thoughts as to whether we should actually make this the server started
message? I don't know if this would be considered conflicting with
IBM's Open for e-Business message but I like the
Hey folks,
I want to update the contributors page of the geronimo.apache.org site...
- trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td bgcolor=#f3f4f5Virtuas/td td
bgcolor=#f3f4f5---/td/tr
+ trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td bgcolor=#f3f4f5Savoir
Thanks!!
Sachin Patel wrote:
+1 and congratulations!
On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:31 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Hey folks,
I want to update the contributors page of the geronimo.apache.org site...
- trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td bgcolor=#f3f4f5Virtuas/td
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/27/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
I want to update the contributors page of the geronimo.apache.org site...
- trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td bgcolor=#f3f4f5Virtuas/td td
bgcolor=#f3f4f5---/td/tr
Thanks John...done.
John Sisson wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hey folks,
I want to update the contributors page of the geronimo.apache.org site...
- trtd bgcolor=#f3f4f5Jeff Genender/td
td bgcolor=#f3f4f5Virtuas/td td
bgcolor=#f3f4f5---/td/tr
+ trtd
I did it the old fashioned way...
I updated the svn for the raw code, then I made a short cut and just
edited the actual site. Made it so I didn't have to publish the whole
thing...I cheated ;-)
Jeff
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/27/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks John...done
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at the
conference can participate?
I'll look into it.
Would anyone be interested in using such a feature ?
I would likely be interested too depending on time.
Jules
-dain
On Jun
I think I am fairly open...preferably later in the evening Dublin since
I am in Colorado. But I am not fussy, because its highly likely my new
baby will be fussy and thus I will be available at any time ;-)
Jeff
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom
, but then I will be sleepy.
-dain
On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at the
conference can participate?
I'll look into it.
Would anyone be interested
Greg Wilkins wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Has anyone broached the subject w/ them?
I think this would be a good conversation to have but considering that
they
don't even push tomcat 5 to any m2 repositories (at least not recent versions)
then I think it would be a long
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Guys,
Covalent had to commit to a time - we went for 6:00pm on thursday.
I realise that this may be a little earlier than some of you were hoping
for, but it was the best we could do at short notice - sorry.
One further problem. We were not able
Actually...let me rephrase that...Bill Dudney and I will put it
together... ;-)
Jeff
Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the ping. Let me see what I can get together...
Jeff
Greg Wilkins wrote:
Jeff,
this suggestion is probably too late
but given the deficiencies
Jason Dillon wrote:
Its a sad time when members of the community are scared to state their
minds in fear of reprisal.
Interesting comment, isn't this what started all of this to begin with?
* * *
I was never very good at math... that is what calculators are for. :-P
--jason
On
Jason Dillon wrote:
Its a sad time when members of the community are scared to state their
minds in fear of reprisal.
Interesting comment, isn't this what started all of this to begin with?
I can't say... not really understanding all of the issues that led us to
this situation. I know
it cant do with plugins, handling snapshot plugins allegedly
works fine. Due to the problems with the m1 versioning I'd like to
give m2 snapshot plugins a chance.
thanks
david jencks
Thnaks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The packaging plugin is at 1.2-SNAPSHOT, and the pom
Jason Dillon wrote:
Guys, I feel like I am allowed to state my opinions.
I am not complaining (and a bit insulted that you think I am), but I
believe that RTC is harmful for a few reasons.
I also feel like some responses to mails I have sent are basically that
I should shut-up (my
Jason Dillon wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, we should be using ${pom.version} anywhere the project version is
needed. No need for a custom property.
I think its by coincidence that we have 1.2-SNAPSHOT for both the plugin
and the G codebase...if its not coincidence, then it shouldn't be.
David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 30, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, we should be using ${pom.version} anywhere the project version is
needed. No need for a custom property.
I think its by coincidence that we have 1.2-SNAPSHOT for both the plugin
Ok...I acquiesce ;-) I be quiet until after the conversion is complete ;-)
Jason Dillon wrote:
I'm not sure I agree that this is easiest or best. I think I would be
interested in getting others' input on this as well.
I believe that while we move to m2 that simpler is better and thus
David Jencks wrote:
I'm not sure I agree that this is easiest or best. I think I would be
interested in getting others' input on this as well. One of the
problems we have now is the chicken/egg issue with the plugin being in
the build itself. I think this would be alleviated by moving
I can probably create some basic poms for them and push em out.
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
We do not have poms for tomcat jars. We have managed so far without
them. It appears that m. assembly pluign is refusing for work without
them. May be Jeff can help with this.
Thanks
Anita
---
No...that is the configuration that handles the plan.
Jason Dillon wrote:
So does that mean that the configs/daytrader-jetty module in trunk is no
longer used and should be nuked ( dropped, removed, deleted, consigned
to the void, dropped into the empty abyss of nothing, ... :-P )?
--jason
I think Matt H should probably decide on that.
Jason Dillon wrote:
Does this need to live in the trunk? Seems that it would make more
sense in the daytrader tree.
--jason
On Jul 1, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
No...that is the configuration that handles the plan.
Jason
.
Is it me, or are we all getting a little too sensitive and reading to
deeply into things?
For the record I'm +/-0 on anything with it.
Jeff
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/1/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Matt H should probably decide on that.
Sure, but before he approaches
+1 - Don't think my vote counts...but I am showing my support anyways ;-)
Mohammed Nour wrote:
Hi All...
+1, but I have a question. Isn't it better to have OEJB as a separate
project, as we have the intention to make it independent from Geronimo,
as to have it work inside or outside
I get similar issues, but upon carefully reviewing the patch(es), I am
in full agreement. +1 to the patch.
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1 to getting this patch in...
I spent some time working with Jason and Jacek last night on this
patch. It is fairly large and reaching. There appears to be
If Jacek +1d it (I don't recall if he did) you have 3 +1s.
Jeff
Jason Dillon wrote:
IIUC, after this restart, we need one more +1 from a PMC member to allow
these changes to be committed to the trunk.
Assuming that another +1 comes in soonish, how long shall I wait before
applying?
I tried to build the v1.1 of Geronimo tag and I noticed that when I went
to do a m:co of openejb, it is giving me the openejb branch instead of
the 2.1 tag. Sure enough, upon perusal of the tagged root maven.xml,
its pulling the openejb branch and not the tag.
I am assuming this is an oversight
Hey Jacek,
BTW, I apologize about the blessing of the final 3 +1s within the 18
hours period. I did not mean to go against your statement. I just
recalled an email about 3 +1s allowed it to happen and there was no need
to wait...that a -1 could be waged at anytime in the future. If I
stepped
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 7, 2006, at 6:32 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I tried to build the v1.1 of Geronimo tag and I noticed that when I went
to do a m:co of openejb, it is giving me the openejb branch instead of
the 2.1 tag. Sure
that comes to mind.
I think it would be nice to have everything bundled up but in many
respects its outside our control.
Jeff Genender wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
On Jul 7, 2006, at 6:32 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:30 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I tried to build the v1.1
Thanks for taking action on this Dave...great idea.
Jeff
David Klavon wrote:
There has been a couple of requests on the user list about where
Geronimo is in regard to moving to JEE 5.0. I started a 'JEE 5.0 Report
Card' in the wiki in an attempt to capture all of the JEE 5.0 JSRs, and
Yep...I did the exact same thing as you to fix this ;-) I just left out
all that SNAPSHOT stuff in the email. But I agree...that needs some
good documenting.
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 7/7/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still believe there is value getting the state of OpenEJB
Susan Wu wrote:
From what I understand, the code release has been made available on the
Geronimo web site and a general announcement has been made with regards
to its availability.
Geronimo folks: do you want this also issued as an official press
release? If so, do you have any
+1
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/11/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to the serious nature of this bug (and we've already had a few
user mails on ActiveMQ about this already and spring 2.0-rc2 has only
been out a short time) I'd like us to get a release of xbean out ASAP
to
1 - 100 of 1297 matches
Mail list logo
