•More than cosmetic effects (Moo.fx)
Just wondering - I don't know much about it - does Moo.fx really have
only cosmetic effects? What is meant by that anyway? I guess I have to
have a look into the slides...
-- Klaus
___
jQuery mailing list
http://www.openajax.org/about.html
anyone interested in joinging the opn ajax alliance.
I think the fact that jquery can run with prototype shows that it
is willing to work well with others.
and every little bit of press helps
___
jQuery mailing
I think thats a question that John would need to answer since he's
leading the jQuery effort.
Rey...
Scottus wrote:
http://www.openajax.org/about.html
anyone interested in joinging the opn ajax alliance.
I think the fact that jquery can run with prototype shows that it
is willing to
I don't have time to sift through this thread, but I just want to say
I gave a talk about Drupal jQuery twice in September and got
nothing but good replies. The slides are online. Mail me if you want
the Apple Keynote file:
http://www.acko.net/blog/jquery-drupalcon-talk
There is also a
On 12/10/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David schrieb:
Dave Methvin schreef:
jQuery: Write less and do more
jQuery: Say no more (for Monty Python fans)
jQuery: Web programming, short and sweet
As long as we are making slogans. I will give it a shot as well
jQuery : the
In spite of my suggestion for the tag line
jQuery: puts the fun back in JavaScript!
I think we should be very careful about be negative about JavaScript,
after all it is the language we are working in.
My line was meant more to reflect that fact the programming cross
browser DOM stuff in
/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7774985
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I think we should be very careful about be negative about
JavaScript, after all it is the language we are working in.
It's a pretty good language, too.
My line was meant more to reflect that fact the programming
cross browser DOM stuff in JavaScript is really painful and
not fun. jQuery
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
I kind of like: jQuery: puts the fun back in JavaScript!
That's much better than the current New Wave JavaScript, which is the
current tagline on the homepage.
(For the people not old enough to know what New Wave is: it's an music
style, popular in the eighties
Don't forget Divo - thats where the jQuery hat comes from :)
Ok folks - http://getjquery.org is up and running :) I couldn't
resist as I got an offer from my web host to upgrade to a re-seller
account for £1 for the next 3 months and a free URL, after that i'll
need to start looking at raising
Krzysztof FF schrieb:
I saw another sabotage at that comparison (
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UP3/JQuery+JS+Library
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/UP3/JQuery+JS+Library ):
DEMO: http://www.dojotoolkit.org/
Demo from JQuery referring to DOJO ??? What the [EMAIL PROTECTED]%*%[EMAIL
Dave Methvin wrote:
You start with 10 lines of jQuery that would have been 20 lines of
tedious DOM Javascript. By the time you are done it's down to two or
three lines and it couldn't get any shorter unless it read your mind.
I think that should be the first paragraph on the homepage!
jQuery, the way that javascript should be.
Just my 2 cents. :)
On 12/8/06, Luke Lutman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solid Source wrote:
1. Change the slogan New Wave Javascript to something more along the
lines
of explaining what it does or how it does it rather than what it is.
Everyone
jQuery, duty now for the future
:)
Pje wrote:
jQuery, the way that javascript should be.
Just my 2 cents. :)
On 12/8/06, Luke Lutman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solid Source wrote:
1. Change the slogan New Wave Javascript to something more along the
lines
of explaining what it does
jQuery: past prototype.
I like the double meaning of it.
Edwin Martin
Christian Bach wrote:
jQuery, duty now for the future
:)
Pje wrote:
jQuery, the way that javascript should be.
Just my 2 cents. :)
On 12/8/06, Luke Lutman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solid Source wrote:
Yeah, but we probably don't want to slam other projects. That seems
kinda like bad sportsmanship or bad geekmanship or something. Doing
something like that may alienate more folks that it attracts. :o/
Cheers,
Chris
Edwin Martin wrote:
jQuery: past prototype.
I like the double meaning of
Hi Sean,
Thanks for the heads up. I contacted the author via email with updated
information in the hopes that he'll revise it to properly represent
jQueries capabilities. Here's what I sent him:
Hi Chuck,
My name is Rey Bango and I'm a volunteer with the jQuery project. I was
recently passed
What about
jQuery: try today - stay forever,
jQuery: JavaScript as it was meant,
jQuery: efficient yet creative
-- Marc
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
Yeah, but we probably don't want to slam other projects. That seems
kinda like bad sportsmanship or bad geekmanship or something. Doing
Edwin Martin wrote:
Christopher Jordan schreef:
Yeah, but we probably don't want to slam other projects. That seems
kinda like bad sportsmanship or bad geekmanship or something. Doing
something like that may alienate more folks that it attracts. :o/
You're right. But we know why
On 12/8/06, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but we probably don't want to slam other projects. That seems kinda
like bad sportsmanship or bad geekmanship or something. Doing something like
that may alienate more folks that it attracts. :o/
Here here! jQuery stands on its
No, let's made changing slogan. Each time new slogan, new first paragraph,
with arrows to browse them!
2006/12/8, Jonathan Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/8/06, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but we probably don't want to slam other projects. That seems
kinda like bad
I just contributed the jQuery API doc to gotapi.com... let's see how long it
takes them to get it up.
Rich
On 12/7/06, Edwin Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rey Bango wrote:
Guys, some of you may know of my efforts to get jQuery more exposure.
I think it would be a good idea to have jQuery
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7768443
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Guys, some of you may know of my efforts to get jQuery more exposure.
Part of that is pro-actively approaching Ajax notables in the ColdFusion
community in an effort to get them to give some face time to jQuery.
Well I'm happy to announce that it looks like I've converted one of the
notables
Hi Rey,
This is slightly off-topic of me but I'm not sure how else to get in
contact with you. I just want you to know that I replied to your
direct email a few weeks ago (regarding the case study), but I think
my email didn't get past your junk filter. Please advise if you are
still
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7742535
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Here is some notes I took on my blackberry. Sometimes I just get
ideas like this and like to take them down. It's for getjquery.com
which could be a great way to promote the library.
Getjquery.org site ideas:
Create a site in a similar vein to getfirefox.org, promoting the
features and values
Rey Bango wrote:
Guys, some of you may know of my efforts to get jQuery more exposure.
I think it would be a good idea to have jQuery on sites like gotapi.com.
They're open for contributions (code, that is).
Site: http://www.gotapi.com/
How to contribute your API:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Subject: [jQuery] Efforts to Convert Folks to jQuery
The reason that I'm posting this is to encourage everyone to be
pro-active in approaching the top names in your respective areas and
development tools and telling them
wrote:
Guys, some of you may know of my efforts to get jQuery more exposure.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery
@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7744856
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss
4. mochikit: Makes JavaScript suck less. - I love this one
First I liked it too, after I thought about it, I don't like the
attitude. Who said, JavaScript sucks...? I wouldn't want to program in a
language that I think it sucks, with or without an API.
I'm really wondering if the gurus think
digital spaghetti schrieb:
Here is some notes I took on my blackberry. Sometimes I just get
ideas like this and like to take them down. It's for getjquery.com
which could be a great way to promote the library.
I like that idea very much! getwhatever.com seems to become a quasi
standard for
/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7746239
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7744856
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss
of other libs (real world
examples)
3. jQuery Site/Project of the week on the frontpage ... and maybe plugin of
the week
Fredi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7746952
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hey Joel,
I'm out of town (I'm replying from the airport) and will be back on Monday.
I'm definitely interested and will buzz you when I get back into town.
I'm sorry I didn't get your reply and will provide you with a couple of
emails in case your replies are getting caught by my filters.
Hey everyone, great feedback. I'm planning on aggregating all of your
suggestions and presenting them to John to see how the jQuery effort can
be better promoted. I'll be back on Monday and will collect all your
suggestions and then send out an email for everyone to check out.
Keep the
1. There really should be a main menu on the frontpage (Download,
Documentation, Community, Plugins, Tutorials ...)
I believe there is.
2. A page where jQuery code is compared to code of other libs (real world
examples)
The blog has 2 or 3 comparisons like this, but they probably need to
Keep in mind that Bob Ippolito is a Python guru, and he specifically wrote
mochikit to make JS behave a bit more like Python. To him, any language
sucks if it uses C-family idioms. :)
We can choose to be more positive, using a phrase like, Makes programming
Web 2.0 fun! Or, something.
- Brian
honestly didn't see those
footer menu links the first few days I started with jQuery.
Fredi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7747499
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Subway wrote:
In the page footer, yes (and linked inside the frontpage text), but there
should be a real menu near the top of the page. I honestly didn't see those
footer menu links the first few days I started with jQuery.
Fredi
I didn't see them for the first few days either. I think
Brian Miller schrieb:
Keep in mind that Bob Ippolito is a Python guru, and he specifically wrote
mochikit to make JS behave a bit more like Python. To him, any language
sucks if it uses C-family idioms. :)
We can choose to be more positive, using a phrase like, Makes programming
Web 2.0
On 12/7/06, Solid Source [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Change the slogan New Wave Javascript to something more along the
lines
of explaining what it does or how it does it rather than what it is.
Everyone thinks they are new wave right? :)
jQuery: $(quick elegant javascript)
-js
Jonathan Sharp schrieb:
On 12/7/06, *Solid Source* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Change the slogan New Wave Javascript to something more along
the lines
of explaining what it does or how it does it rather than what it is.
Everyone thinks they are new
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Sharp
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Efforts to Convert Folks to jQuery
jQuery: $(quick elegant javascript)
-js
-
THAT has some promise actually...
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss
Suggestions from the information architect in me:
1. Get a global navigation, The links at the bottom are not natural. At
the top, in big buttons horizontal.
a. Home
b. Samples
c. Plugins
d. Support
e. Download
f. Blog
a. Home
This page should say what it is and have a
I liked Dave's (or was it Dan - cannot find it anymore)
quite recent quote. Something like:
jQuery - makes JavaScript as short as if it read your mind.
It was this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/Change-href-of-external-links-tf2718387.html#a7627703
You start with 10 lines of jQuery that
://jquery.com/discuss/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Efforts-to-Convert-Folks-to-jQuery-tf2774482.html#a7749080
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com
I like this one:
*Cons*
- New toolkit
- Small community
- Minimal documentation
:) Guys made in depth analyse
2006/12/7, Sean O [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey Rey,
Someone posted an alternate comparison in the comments that did feature
jQuery:
jQuery - Putting the DOM in its place.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
to Convert Folks to jQuery
Suggestions from the information architect in me:
1. Get a global navigation, The links at the bottom are not natural. At
the top, in big buttons horizontal.
a. Home
b. Samples
c. Plugins
d. Support
e. Download
f. Blog
jQuery - DOM'inated
On 12/7/06, Paul McLanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jQuery - Putting the DOM in its place.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
___
jQuery mailing
Actually, we discuss same stuff few weeks ago, and we where promised that
new jquery site will come very soon. Only thing new I saw that site is
havier to navigate (due to some content re-arrangment), there's no live
demos in docs, and there's no demo page, just folder content. The first demo
Alex Cook schrieb:
Did anyone ever see that 'Learn Ruby in 15 Minutes' app that floated
around prolly a year ago now?
http://tryruby.hobix.com/
I've been poking at trying to do something similar for jQuery.
Hopefully this weekend I'll have something to share.
Doing a screencast with
Andy Matthews schrieb:
I'd have to agree with everything that Glen says, and I'd add something.
Instead of just showing how powerful and easy jQuery is to use, why not
show people how it compares to other libraries?
Pick 5 or 10 things fairly common things, then show the code for each
Patrick Hall schrieb:
Hi folks,
What about some sort of interactive about or quick tour page? I
imagine something like this:
The page loads with a simple jQuery logo. When you click it (or after
a short wait if the user can't figure out how to click ;-] ) a
div#info slideDown()s
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Doing a screencast with some spoken explanation with some jQuery
scripting on the firebug console could be a good introduction to jQuery.
If you can script it on the console, you can script it everywhere!
Interesting! I just had the idea of having a command line on
From: Klaus Hartl
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Efforts to Convert Folks to jQuery
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
Doing a screencast with some spoken explanation with some jQuery
scripting on the firebug console could be a good introduction to jQuery.
If you can script it on the console, you can script
Dragan Krstic wrote:
english is not my native
You don't say! ;o)
Well, it's not too shabby for not being a native speaker. :o)
...and lot of developers in love?
I wish I were in love. lol! ;o)
First paragraph Suggestion:
jQuery is a javascript framework that is highly coupled to CSS and
eliminates the cross-browser complexities of DOM scripting. If you love
CSS, you will love jQuery.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
2006/12/8, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dragan Krstic wrote:
english is not my native
You don't say! ;o)
Well, it's not too shabby for not being a native speaker. :o)
I'm doing my best, but I use lot of I, and but, and actually and
and
...and lot of developers in love?
Agree with Glen but with some modifications,
1. Each navigation option should have a cool tooltip which uses jQuery
describing or intro to its actual content.
2. Samples would be replace with a better word, e.g. See in Action
, Cool Samples... , it should have a version of jquery and plugins
Don't be a DOMass ;)
--- Paul McLanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jQuery - Putting the DOM in its place.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I kind of like: jQuery: puts the fun back in JavaScript!
[huge snip]
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
65 matches
Mail list logo
