On 25 Aug 2012, at 07:53, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/24/2012 12:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 23 Aug 2012, at 03:21, Stephen P. King wrote:
Bruno does not seem to ever actually address this directly. It is
left as an open problem
The body problem?
I address this directly as I show
On 23 Aug 2012, at 03:21, Stephen P. King wrote:
Bruno does not seem to ever actually address this directly. It is
left as an open problem
The body problem?
I address this directly as I show how we have to translate the body
problem in a pure problem of arithmetic, and that is why
no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 11:24:16
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
What exactly determines the 10^500
mailto:stephe...@charter.net
*Receiver:* everything-list mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-22, 11:19:29
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best
mereology
Hi Richard,
This description assumes an embedding space-time
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 12:34:59
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
According to Shing-Tung Yau http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shing-Tung_Yau
: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 13:16:14
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Thank God- just an expression.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Hi Richard,
I am familiar with those idea and several others
everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-22, 21:35:56
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
On 8/22/2012 6:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/22/2012 7:43 PM, meekerdb wrote
, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything
could function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-23, 08:18:36
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Hi Roger,
OK, we agree
What in the theory suggests that landscapes are a problem? Is there any
evidence in any theory that only one possible set of physical laws has to
pervade all of existence, or is this just an unsupported preconception/hope
of physicists who've spent a big chunk of their lives looking for a unique
function.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Stephen P. King
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-21, 15:25:31
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys
On 22 Aug 2012, at 08:31, Jason Resch wrote:
What in the theory suggests that landscapes are a problem? Is there
any evidence in any theory that only one possible set of physical
laws has to pervade all of existence, or is this just an unsupported
preconception/hope of physicists who've
.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-08-21, 15:39:37
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma?
already found at the LHC and several other
@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-21, 15:25:31
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
Neither CYM's nor strings physically exist-- instead, they represent
things
Hi Jason,
Nothing in the theory suggests that landscapes are a problem! But
that is kinda my point, we have to use meta-theories of one sort or
another to evaluate theories. Occam's Razor is a nice example... My
point is that explanations should be hard to vary and get the result
that
: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Baloney. Strings are extended in space. Where did you get that from?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
?
Unlike everyday strings, the strings of string theory
-08-21, 21:26:58
Subject: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant?
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
Yes Stephan,
The 10^500 possible windings of flux constraining the compactified
dimensions
are sufficient to populate some 10^120 universes with every monad unique or
distinct.
The CYMs are known to be discrete
and since the hyperfine constant varies across the universe
it is likely that the
: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best
mereology
Baloney. Strings are extended in space. Where did you get that from?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
�
Unlike everyday strings, the strings of string theory
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant�
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
On Tue, Aug
everything could function.
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-22, 09:17:38
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best
mereology
Hi Richard,
This description assumes an embedding space-time that is separable
from the monads in it. One alternative is to work with an abstract
model of (closed under mutual inclusion) totally disconnected compact
spaces where the individual components of the space are the images that
.
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Richard Ruquist mailto:yann...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list
mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-21, 21:26:58
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully
best
Stephan,
That is very interesting. I have been using a model based on the monads
being enumrable
as in an abstract Godelian Peano Arithmetic. Do you have a particular model
in mind?
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
Hi Richard,
This
:* 2012-08-21, 21:26:58
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best
mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant�
varied monotonically across
Hi Richard,
So far it seems that a model of monads as enumerable as a Godelian
PA would work, but one would ahve to convert that into a complete
atomic Boolean algebraic form for it to fit neatly into the scheme that
I am using. What I am doing is exploring the idea first discussed by
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and
hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each
monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations
On 8/22/2012 4:36 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Jason,
Nothing in the theory suggests that landscapes are a problem! But that is kinda my
point, we have to use meta-theories of one sort or another to evaluate theories. Occam's
Razor is a nice example... My point is that explanations
On 8/22/2012 2:44 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 4:36 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Jason,
Nothing in the theory suggests that landscapes are a problem!
But that is kinda my point, we have to use meta-theories of one sort
or another to evaluate theories. Occam's Razor is a nice
On 8/22/2012 7:43 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 1:09 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/22/2012 2:44 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 4:36 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Jason,
Nothing in the theory suggests that landscapes are a problem!
But that is kinda my point, we have to use
On 8/22/2012 6:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/22/2012 7:43 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 1:09 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/22/2012 2:44 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 4:36 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Jason,
Nothing in the theory suggests that landscapes are a problem! But
On 8/22/2012 9:35 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 6:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/22/2012 7:43 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 1:09 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 8/22/2012 2:44 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/22/2012 4:36 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Jason,
Nothing in the theory
: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
Stephan,
Well I agree the CYMs are a form of substance. But there are string theories
where the background spacetime is flexible, to use a common term. So that is
not a theory limitation.
The frozen block approximation allows for certain solutions
String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma
already found at the LHC and several other sites.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
Neither
On 8/21/2012 3:39 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma
already found at the LHC and several other sites.
Hi Richard,
Could you link some sources on this?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.net
Steinberg P. Soft Physics from RHIC to the LHC. arXiv:nucl-ex/09031471,
2009.
Kovtum PK, Son DT Starinets AO. Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum
Field Theories from Black Hole Physics. arXiv:hep-th/0405231.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/21/2012 3:58 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Steinberg P. Soft Physics from RHIC to the LHC.
arXiv:nucl-ex/09031471, 2009.
Kovtum PK, Son DT Starinets AO. Viscosity in Strongly Interacting
Quantum
Field Theories from Black Hole Physics. arXiv:hep-th/0405231.
Good! Now to see if
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On
Hi Stephen P. King
Mereology is part and parcel of Leibniz's system, to use a limp pun.
1) Although unproven, but because God is good while the world is contingent
(imperfect, misfitting),
Leibniz, like Augustine and Paul, believed that things as a whole work for
good, but unfortunately not
Wiki: Mereology has been axiomatized in various ways as applications
of predicate
logic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate_logic to formal
ontologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_ontology,
of which mereology is an important part. A common element of such
axiomatizations is the assumption,
Hi Roger,
On 8/20/2012 6:48 AM, Roger wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Mereology is part and parcel of Leibniz's system, to use a limp pun.
I like puns! They show us that existence does not just have one
side/form/pattern/perspective...
1) Although unproven, but because God is good while the
On 8/20/2012 11:36 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Wiki: Mereology has been axiomatized in various ways as applications
of predicate logic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate_logic to
formal ontology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_ontology, of
which mereology is an important part. A common
Hi Stephan,
I do not think that string theory requires a fixed background.
Otherwise string theory could not be a prospective ToE.
Richard
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/20/2012 11:36 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Wiki: Mereology has been
On 8/20/2012 1:40 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Hi Stephan,
I do not think that string theory requires a fixed background.
Otherwise string theory could not be a prospective ToE.
Richard
Hi Richard,
I had the very same reaction, but research it for yourself. Look at
the literature, the
43 matches
Mail list logo
