That's not Westlake is it?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 09:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: body type
Rich,
In exch admin go to user mailbox select clean mailbox, under custom message
type enter OOFRULES (be aware that this will delete all rules for this
user), works 95% of the time. Renter OOO and it should work.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have
Has anyone experienced a problem with Outlook 2000 connecting to Exchange
5.5 sp4 and receiving the error 'The messaging interface has returned an
unknown error. If the problem persists, restart Outlook.' when composing
large emails (it loses the new email).
Article Q275/1/86 refers to this
you
send it and the Outlook would give back an error when it done that as well
as if we sent it. I don't know how relevant this is for you but it may be
something to look at.
PS: the server problem turned out being a bad cable.
Chris Hyche
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto
John,
It's in your exchsrvr\bin directory.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 August 2001 00:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Orin,
It is possible to move subfolders, but you have to use the exchange client
that allows directory pane movement (Outlook does not allow this).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
Well it's overcast, warm (don't know how that happened) but not raining
(horayy) here in Weybridge.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Jack,
The prompt for user name password is an NT Domain prompt, is there a problem
with the trust between the users NT domain and Exchange's? we have this when
a users tries to move between different EU domains without asking (IE logs
into a different NT domain then normal)
Cheers
Paul
Hey, does this mean we will get a upgrade to our Compaq servers (a sticky
badge with Compaq/HP to over sticker the current badge ;-), well this
happened over here when ITV (television company) took over ON digital
(digital arial transmitter company).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like
Yes, but the US dollar is the occult specialists :-) (Hint: look for the
illuminati eye).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11
Ed,
There is no need to 'quit' ;-) ('The previous post quiting that there are
seldom good technological.').
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
Ed,
I thought they were making a bruised (left eye) face !-)..;-)
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2001 04:14
Martin,
Ehhh, are you trying to send us all mad, don't you know you can't look
at C without going insane?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL
Subject: RE: External E-mail
So I made a typo. Sue me.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hurst, Paul
Sent: Thursday
I believe the problem is not in adding people BUT removing them, even though
they are removed they still have the permissions.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrison
You will probably need to set the 'instance' to your server, Under Public
information store.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14
Kurt,
Are you trying to start the FAQ flame again, (IE please read the FAQ it is
to do with the setting in the IMC restriction) AND I HIGHLY advise not
removing it (every seen a exchange server fall over when it's filled up with
a mail loop, it's horrible).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like
Please note that there is a new Email virus out with an attachment Gone.scr
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
**
The information contained in
Brett,
Use to use that at my last place no complaints, in fact we found it better
than Arcserve/Legatto for Exchange.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski
Dat 4174 covers the virus
-Original Message-
From: Fred W. Macondray Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange / McAfee / ePolicy Orchestrator Question
Hi All,
Sorry this is slightly off topic, but NAI is
I reckon you should buy a Pentium 66 PC that and move the services over that
will get rid of 99% idle time
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: System Idle Process
I should just
It will send as that person (not on behalf) as the NT permission will
override (been there, got the tee shirt).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Bevilacqua.Steve [mailto:[EMAIL
Leaving for our data protection officer to deal with
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: UK Data Protection law changes affect Exchange
Administrators
It would make my life as
as well.
Personally I dont think you are protected from any of the brown stuff flying
from the fan.
Stewart Jump
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 December 2001 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: UK Data Protection law changes affect
Exchange has newsgroup connection to retrieve newgroups that are sign up to,
but you need a ISP or site that will support you.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris,
Why is it a 'stupid' option for null senders?
Cheers
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR's filling my mailbox
Well at the moment I'm unable to access an
messages. Bouncing them,
as a lot of mailers do, is not RFC compliant and a bloody
nuisance :-)
Cheers,
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
You do't want to do that.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:17 PM
To: Exchange
the virus_detected_and_removed.txt file. I'm
so proud. :)
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stripping attachments
You do't want to do that.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody
of IT repeatedly launch virii such as love letter
and melissa because they stubbornly refuse to purchase any antivirus for
their mail.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stripping
Yes, but all you do is add the allowed users to the restrictions list for
that mailbox on to what Ed said to do.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt -
Yep, they are all fair game here ;-)
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Mike Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Mike,
You haven't recently moved this email account from one server to another or
org? if you have it is because you have not deleted and reinstalled the OAB
entry in Outlook.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
Maybe IP forwarding is not set?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Mike,
If you don't or can't restore the data back in AND you are brave you could
always use the Authrest Exchange utility on the CD.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Soysal,
Greg,
I would look at KVS, here is just a few good points. Merges old PST's into
the archive vault with SIS via checksums, uses NTFS to store archive files,
compresses the message so when the client is reading the 'email' it is sent
compressed straight to the client software (helps dial in
You might have to give reviewer permission to Mailbox level above, if the
procedure still comes back with unable to display.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: VC [mailto:[EMAIL
Use to work at 110,000 user exchange site, had Email Admins all around the
world. We could never run it from one Email admin group (KM security,
rebuilds, servers doing one function etc), maybe they are referring to
working with multiply Email Admins groups on the same system but time zoned
The PST has been cleared down, this is the white space/marked deleted items
taking up the space. Now if you had a util to undelete deleted PST email
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original
?
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
The PST has been cleared down, this is the white space/marked deleted items
taking up the space. Now if you had a util to undelete
Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
So PST files never reduce in size, regardless if everything is deleted?
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
The PST has been cleared
Come back you coward, It's only a flesh wound.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange
Can you not use the SMTP address of the mailbox (which resolves even to
hidden mailboxes)?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
David,
The second half of exmerge process?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: David Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:41 PM
To: Exchange
Pete,
Depends on the backup software you are using will it allow network backups?
At my last place (BP) and here we have dedicated tape backup machines IE no
tapes drives on live servers (IE no reboots when the SCSI tape is lost).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees
We evaluated it, a bit complicated to install as it can use Oracle or MS SQL
as it's index control, but for us we found KVS Vault product was more
applicable A) easier to install run with MS technology and B) it can SIS the
PST's that are imported back in.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like
Juancho,
But this user requires the directory info also so he will need to restore
the same name server to be able to access his restored DIR.edb.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
I don't know if this is exactly the same but NAI have the following variant.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
--
Hello,
W32/Fbound.c@mm has been raised to 'Medium On Watch'
You are missing the 'restore key change' required after an offline backup
restored.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: csr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 March 2002 01:10
To:
Nik,
Is the 'cached info' used/collected from when you was on-line? and not when
lasted connected using DUN.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL
Octopus?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 20:02
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange replication or Imge
Joyce,
Probably because he has the test/alternative server is on the live network
and restoring it from the live RAIT drive backup server, that backed up the
live server (We had this at BP).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to
Small Business Solution? for upto 50 users? with the advantages of
SQL/proxy/etc?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tonazzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 March 2002
Kuku,
I believe you want upgrade to SP4 as this fixes 'ghosts' in the MTA server
cache.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27
I assume that when you installed BE 8.6 or upgrade to SP on NT that there
where on problems on the NT files that deal with backups and I assumed you
looked at Tech article (that refer to something very similar) 010-101199 or
010-100041 on Veritas.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
Chris,
Yes, but remember to do the 'instance' otherwise you will not see and data
in the folders.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: CHRIS H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
David,
You could always purchase something like 'KVS Enterprise Vault' restore each
backup and archive it to the Vault in turn and then use it's indexing search
system (words or phrases) to locate information in body text and
attachments.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody
Andrea,
You will need to have a replica of the free/busy folder on the 'other'
system as you don't have the trusts between them(I assume you just see
stripped info on users on the other server when locking at there free and
busy.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees
the Vault Store and the Vaults, however for the sort of operation David is
talking about, it would probably be a good solution.
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 7:49 PM
Subject: RE
Jon,
we are in the process of putting out live pilot out to the techs, main
advantage I found over other products is that the import of PST's Emails are
re-SIS'ed into the archive store (really handy for migrations and server
moves) including Emails that were sent to different exchange servers
To overcome the possible chance of every increasing archive storage you can
have an HSM product to reduce on-line storage requirements, as the Emails
are stored within a NTFS structured file/folders.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one
Heather,
A basic tool comes with the NT Backoffice resource kit that supplies a
version of Crystal reports (4.5 old!!) but with sample reports that give A)
the records your interested in B) basic server summary of Email transferred
in/transferred out/ local delivery and they can be used in a new
Or even easier, type in the short name
Net stop MSEXCHANGESA /y
Net stop MSEXCHANGESA /y
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 April
Filipe,
For Windows go to
http:\\support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q320454 it relies on
having NT 4 SP4 or higher and q279631 for windows\exchange sp level they are
on.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use
Eric,
You can confirm that these reminders are in the calendar folder created by
Outlook (not a look-alike folder called 'calendar'?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Hansen,
a calendar folder in a PST? If that is
what you speak of then the appointments are in the calendar folder on the
mailbox. If not then please tell me cause I'm very curious.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:43 AM
Wordmail= Very very bad (see ms02-021 (q321804)).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002 02:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Yep, I have also got one of these as well (who the heck is food directory
anyway) and there site gives no easy way to unsubscribe :-(
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Thank god it's just not me thinking somehow I had subscribed twice without
asking.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 April 2002
Christian,
I found that 'Archive one' would have required at least some PF servers
unless you want one with 200Gb+ PF store, eCon did not SIS the PST's when
migrated back in and was heavy on the install with two CD's and lots of
install options (Oracle/SQL etc;) also their pre-sales tech support
Ken/Christian,
If you have any more questions then my brief summary just email me
offline/direct and I will try to help.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL
Cheers Christian saves me from digging it out again.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Christian Schlosser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 01:56
To: Exchange
And they say that the world is small (I believe them to many coincidences
like this happen).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Peter,
Just wondering how is he going to get his Outlook to resolve against a
calendar PF with a third party utility?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter
Richard,
As far as I was aware high encryption level was available before 6a as you
need the high level 6a when applying this service pack level (IE once the
server is set to high level you cannot install the standard 6a service
pack).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody
Victoria,
Please note, if your service account is in it's own domain (say admin
domain/user domain) and you are just moving the exchange servers from a
resource domain to 'a n other' domain then make sure the users log out as
the server doesn't appear to stop for the Outlook clients, but will
Chris,
Not really what happens is that each contract basically has to look after
itself and cannot expect 'help' from a central source unless the contract is
being held to ransom.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
I always thought it was, there is no B: drive ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Drive m:
There is no C: drive.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith
Niki,
You haven't said if you have checked in the mail entering this site in
tracking logs to see if exchange actually received it through the IMS
connector? have you checked the tracking logs?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants
Ron,
Or restore it to a off network version of the same server and export the
DL's and import them into the live networked server.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj
Ric,
Make sure you cannot 'DELETE' the contacts folder (IE it is NOT the Outlook
created contacts folder but a named lookalike created by the user). I have
seen this here once, don't know how they deleted the 'real' contacts folder
as they don't have access to Exchange client, but user will find
We had one here at Brooklands, Weybridge UK
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is everyone?
Monday and Tuesday were holidays for us over here in the UK to celebrate the
Steve,
With KVS there is one major problem, it is with mobile users as the
offline/Palm pilots etc; only stores the short-cut not the original Email
(the next version 3.8 should hopefully have offline vault to overcome this,
but still not for palm pilots, etc;) so they cannot be read.
N.B.
Sean,
I believe 98's will be probably using Wins and W2K will be trying to use
DNS, have a look at your DNS settings.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Sean [mailto:[EMAIL
As in Number (no.) or as in Good? (no good)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
No bad
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Just pulling you leg ;-) (I assumed you meant that)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Wal-Mart
I meant NOT BAD
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto
What version of Windows/SP level are you on? If Windows NT 4 sp5 then there
is a memory leak problem resolved with SP6?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL
Also as long as you don't have IXOS eCon archive email as that uses it as
well.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June
James,
Probably they suggested it as it is a cheap way to archive Email (other
serious Archive Email solutions cost in the region of £10,000+).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From:
On your comment about
Oh, and by the way, how much is that actually taking up on your server? 1GB?
Not with single instance storage!
---
I think you might not quite understand the problem with SIS, it is only good
for when the email is being sent in
Aamir,
Does the recovered Emails have any system attendant messages that are NOT
from the current setup?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Aamir Hanif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 July 2002 15:57
To:
Mark,
Are you not able to do the 'move server' method (IE just like a restore set
up a exchnage system with the same names etc but using the EDB from the sbs
system and recreate the Directory?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original
of the account with
admin rights occurs. Worth a try though! Pity one can't add a BDC to the SBS
system and promote that one to PDC afterwards, so that you get the correct
accounts across.
Sander
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 09:49
David,
I assume that the telnet session used the server namer and not it's ip
address? IE it can resolve the exchange name. By the way what is Outlook's
(what version) binding order and do you use Wins or DNS to resolve?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not
and then get
Outlook to use Dial up
networking which is set to use the VPN connection, it asks for his user name
and pass, proceeds
to load the icons on the left then hangs.
David
--
From: Hurst, Paul[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 13
That's not good (for us mortals) CoC
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2002 14:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Meeting messages disappearing.. Oh my...
Great one! You've awoken!
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu
Nizar,
Is the Outlook form cache getting corrupt? Have you tried deleting it and
trying to access the form/template?
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 August
Greg,
Enter the SMTP address in outlook and it will resolve it to the address held
in the GAL IE it will give you the details required to locate it in Exchange
Admin.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood
Doesn't SBS 2000 (I know SBS 4.5 did) have a 'special' ERTN that is put in
the Internet connector?
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Errington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 August 2002 16:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000, ISA and ISDN
Not with Exchange 2000,
Pete,
Never had the problem here.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 August 2002 09:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Admin.exe can no longer connect to Exch
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
