I don't know what is happening but I have tried the following on five
Exchange 2003 servers using Outlook 2003 in cached mode from default
installs.
If I use Outlook 2003 on a new mailbox and allow it to sync fully then send
a message to myself. It will take approximately 30 seconds to appear in
the menus or through a registry hack.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:53 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Slightly OT
, they wouldn't have changed that
mode of operation from previous versions of Exchange/Outlook...
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Slightly OT: Outlook 2003 in cached mode
I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the
directory service.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Insufficient
Qiang,
Exchange will also support client connections over POP3 and IMAPv4.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Qiang Peng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 November 2003 08:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Protocol for communication between Outlook and Exchange
Server
Thanks Michael. The old one certainly didn't work as well as we would like
so I'll give the new one a go.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 November 2003 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Ontrack PowerControls
The new version is
Nobody got any thoughts on this problem?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2003 12:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PFAdmin Rehome
Hmmm doing some more digging around I notice that the attributes Home-MTA
and Home-MDB
Hi all,
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP2
PFAdmin 1.3.0
I need some help with PFadmin to rehome public folders. Situation is the
original public folder server has a corrupt database which can't be
repaired, already come to this conclusion with PSS. We need to move all the
PF's homed on this
: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2003 12:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PFAdmin Rehome
Hi all,
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP2
PFAdmin 1.3.0
I need some help with PFadmin to rehome public folders. Situation is the
original public folder server has a corrupt
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Outlook 2000
Hi all,
I am looking for information for the logon procedure of Outlook 2000 to an
Exchange 5.5 mailbox. We are adding permissions to our mailboxes for our new
AD domain, but some Outlook clients are getting prompted for their username
and password. I want to be
We run Exchange 5.5 on a HP SAN with our own DR solution. This is signed off
by Microsoft PSS. I believe MS support Exchange on a SAN but not a NAS.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 September 2003 17:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Excuse my ignorance what is the vulnerability, do you have a Q article or
security update number from MS. When was the vulnerability reported.
TIA,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
What about MDBVU32?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 18:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 0 items, 7 unread
Thanks, but there is nothing in that folder. ESM reports 0 items. Tried
Exchange client anyway - it sees
Michael,
How useful do you find Power Controls? We purchased it and have used it on a
few occasions with about a 50:50 success rate. On the times that it fails it
said that the edb is unreadable. Ontrack says this can occur when a lot of
transaction logs haven't been committed to the database.
Sorry the subject line is so vague should say Read Receipts but this just
triggers a safeguard.
Exchange 5.5, SP4 Post-SP4 hot-fixes, OS Win2K SP2 post-sp2 hot fixes
We have an intermittent problem with read receipts, they are being returned
to users in the wrong language, usually German. This
Messages (Read)
The read receipts are generated when sending to users which are internal or
external?
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:37:26 +0100
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: System Messages
. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Yes purging from deleted item recovery will remove it from
That would most likely be illegal in the UK because it would contrivine the
data protection act and RIP act. You would also be liable becuase you set it
up.
Just my 2p's worth,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 August 2003 14:38
To: Exchange
I am still using Exch 5.5 with Outlook 2000 in offline mode. It isn't saving
a synch file for me either.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 August 2003 14:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sychronization logs
Well contacted a power user
Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange even if
you shift delete. Do a search for dumpsteralwayson on Microsoft website.
This is a reg key that can be added to retrieve items from any folder. It is
retrospective.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Ward,
Found the article it is 178630.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 19:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange
We run Trend and automatically update every hour.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 19:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Heads up on a new virus
Just out of curiosity, who here uses trend and how often do you have it set
to
This whole process is covered under Single Instance Storage functionality of
Exchange. Only one instance of a message exists with pointers for each user
that was sent the message. If you had three servers and the message was sent
to mailboxes on each server then you would have three instances in
too and achieved the same
result?
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 2:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Del eted Items Retention - Confirmation
Nope your wrong, you can recover items from the dumpster on Exchange
On the note of this Virus I think we updated in time. But I see ISSCan was
updated post sp4 for Exchange 5.5. Does anyone have the latest version of
the file?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 August 2003 21:14
To: Exchange Discussions
I wonder how many organisations are still running NT 3.51 or MS Mail?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government.
If you want to see how much space you have left in the database then have a
look in the application event log for 1221.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 16:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance
on disk then I have roughly 7 gb
free space to work with?
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: XCH 5.5 DB Maintenance
If you want to see how much space you have
If you are using the Exchange aware agent you wouldn't be aware that it was
backing up the priv.edb, pub.edb or even dir.edb, you would just select
Exchange Information Store and Exchange Directory store. Sounds to me you
are still using the file system part of Backup Exec to try and backup the
That is not possible you can't do a file backup of the databases files they
are locked open unless you stop the IS. What app are you trying to use to
read the edb files is it Ontrack's Power Tools?
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30
back-up the PRIV.EDB. Just trying
to quell an argument with one my guys, and needed to make sure that you
weren't able to backup the PRIV.EDB without stopping the services.
Thanks
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:39 PM
the utility finds the
PRIV.EDB in the information store on the backup media. It would be great if
it could just read from the tape, open it, and then access the mailboxes, or
messages you want to access.
Thanks,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
to get back mailboxes in the
past and while this is dead easy, it takes hours to restore the IS from
tape.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 17:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto Accept Utility stopped working
Right
How about Exchange 2003 with Volume Shadowing on a SAN. Not seen it in
practise but I thought this was one of the strong selling points of E2K3.
Anyone had any experience?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 July 2003 18:14
To: Exchange
Subject: RE: High Availability Exchange 2000
Being able to take snapshot backups and restores is going to be sweet.
Is there anything out there that supports it yet?
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:17 AM
To: Exchange
Hi Guys,
I have read the FAQ on www.swinc.com with regard to changing the domain a
Exchange 5.5 server resides in. What I am not clear on is whether you can
run a site with some servers in one domain and some in the other or whether
all servers must reside in one domain or the other within the
We experienced a similar problem with a Free/Busy system folder and
Microsoft pointed us at the following article
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;288420 don't know if
it will help in your instance.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst
In addition to Peter's comments the outcmd.dat file should not be available
on a network share through Windows 2000 Application Data redirection. This
is because the first instance will lock the file open, the second incidence
will try to open the file each time you open a message and will take 15
For clarification check out
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810591
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 March 2003 15:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AD 2003 and Ex2k
Aye
-Original
See Technet article 152808 and the associated whitepaper discussed in the
article.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2003 15:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain
FAQ
On 3/5/03
Now I am confused with what you are after. Do you want to know the NT
permissions that are assigned through Exchange Administrator? If this is the
case you can do a directory export using the pseudo attributes Obj-Admins,
Obj-Perm-Admins and Obj-Users. However, if you want to find the permissions
Surely the choice of backup device will have a greater effect on backup
performance than the software. Backing up to a local drive is going to be
faster than sending it across the network to a centralised DAT device. SDLT
devices are faster than DLT, etc., etc. In addition you need to compromise
Have you had a look at MBInfo?
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2003 17:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Way to identify shared or delegate access mailboxes
Scripted how? As in .csv, dir export or what?
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange alias naming
Thanks for the reply Chris,
Well posting this message was useful in that it has questioned possibly
a long held belief. I have
:57, Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exchange 5.5
I have always made my Exchange mailbox alias the same as the NT user ID this
simplifies the authentication process for POP3, IMAP and NNTP and it makes
it easy to rollout Outlook through an intellimirror mst file. However, one
of my
Exchange 5.5
I have always made my Exchange mailbox alias the same as the NT user ID this
simplifies the authentication process for POP3, IMAP and NNTP and it makes
it easy to rollout Outlook through an intellimirror mst file. However, one
of my clients has a different naming convention in the
in the
microsoft.public.exchange.admin newsgroup. You'll get several hits that
describe how to log into the DS mailbox
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 6:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Directory Service Mailbox
Exchange 5.5, SP4, Windows 2000 SP2
I am sure I read on Technet once that you can log onto the Directory Service
mailbox, but I can't seem to find it now. The problem we had with directory
replication has now be resolved with a post-sp4 hotfix. But it would be
useful to add to my notes if and how
I know this argument has occurred on here before, but it looks as though
Microsoft will support Exchange 2000 on a particular NAS solution.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/63/27368.html
Regards,
Paul
--
If you have
Hi all,
Does anyone know if their are any problems with the list I have not received
mail for the last two days. Does anyone know a mail address of the
administrators to make sure they are not receiving any NDR's from my mail
address.
Please send a mail directly to me email address if you
it just turned on. This is the first message I have
received in days
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 5:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Is the list okay
Hi all,
Does anyone know if their are any problems with the list
What about Microsoft Meta Services (MMS) if the other systems have a LDAP
directory store.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 September 2002 16:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
CSVDE
LDIFDE
iNNERHOST
http://www.innerhost.com
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Hi Michelle,
I have checked the RPC binding order and it is correctly set
: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Andrey,
Thanks again for the input. Unfortunately we are using Exchange 5.5 and not
Exchange 2000 so all lookups are done
Hi all,
Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A
I hope someone can help, does anyone know of a whitepaper that documents in
detail the Outlook logon process? I want to know the order things are done,
i.e. names resolution occurs first using DNS by default, then
-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Hi all,
Exch 5.5, SP4, post-SP4 hotfixes, Windows 2000 SP2 and Windows NT 4 SP6A
I hope someone can help, does anyone know
Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAPI/Outlook detailed logon process
Thanks for your reply Andrey,
However, I was under the impression that Outlook is a winsock
application and therefore
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP 6A
Ok before I get flamed I am pretty sure I understand the Outlook logon
process, in that by default it uses DNS to resolve the name of the Exchange
server for Outlook to logon. Once this is found it will then authenticate
the mailbox against the NT domain. Here is
points to a problem?
Do Q269081 or Q315008 have any part in this issue?
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Bendall, Paul
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 05:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook logon process
Exchange 5.5
In addition you can look up the Home server from within Outlook. Open the
Address book from within Outlook (I've only checked this on O2K). Make sure
Global Address list is in the Show names from the field, then right click
and select properties, It will give you the home server of the user.
I asked a question about PFadmin yesterday that was unanswered so I will
make the scope a little wider. Is their a way to automate the process of
rehoming public folders to a new server? Can't use the Exchange Admin
program because the sub-folders aren't necessarily located in our site,
can't use
Is the alias of the mailbox the same as the NT userid? I seem to remember in
Exchange 5.5 having problems with POP3 if the alias and NTuserid were not
the same, in which case you had to use the username something like NT
domain\ntuserid\mailbox alias so it was always simpler to just make sure the
I am after some clarification of my understanding. Firstly we are talking
Exchange 5.5 SP4. What I want to achieve is to delete items in a public
folder once they have become too old. I assume I can select the public
folder in question and change the value of Age limit for replicas (days)
to the
We have IP TV so every desktop can be a TV, what a result no need to miss a
single match and all at the comfort of my desk. Although it doesn't give you
any excuse to take extended lunches at the pub!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June
Sorry one of the benefits of working for a bank.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 10:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: very OT
when do you have a job-opening?
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
I have got a feeling the answer to this question is quite complicated, but
here goes anyway. I have found in the directory store of Exchange 5.5 is an
attribute called Employee Number, we would like to use this field for
recording employee numbers. However, in the creation of a new mailbox this
: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Administrator Customisation
I have got a feeling the answer to this question is quite complicated, but
here goes anyway. I have found in the directory store of Exchange 5.5
Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Administrator Customisation
We had the same issue here. We use asp to create mailboxes so helpdesk can
view, set and search on that attribute. There could be an easier way, but I
don't know of one.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
Have a look on your machine for a file called services, usually under
c:\winnt\system32\drivers\etc it lists all the most commonly used ports.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 11:30
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Have you tried sending a telnet message from port 25, some systems will
reject you after you enter the mail from field or may even wait until you
send the data command.
Rgds,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June 2002 11:28
To: Exchange
Discussions
Subject: RE: ports
when I do that I see: nbname 137/udp
what is nbname?
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 June, 2002 12:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ports
Have a look on your machine for a file called services
/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnactdi
r/html/msdn_adsiexch.asp
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 June 2002 11:20
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange Administrator Customisation
Subject: RE: Exchange Administrator
Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Administrator Customisation
Alternatively you could just import them in once a week using a directory
import csv.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL
If you are running Windows 2000 with active directory then you could setup
folder redirection for application data and host this on a network share,
but I am not sure how much use this would be if you are not using the same
ntuser.dat for the registry settings.
Regards,
Paul
-Original
Good it was but that last ten minutes seemed like a lifetime
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 June 2002 15:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's OT time
.Damn good!
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Specialist
BT Ignite
Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bendall, Paul
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 7:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: It's OT time
Good it was but that last ten
Keith,
If it was me I would refuse to set this up until I hand something in writing
from the manager who I had explained the security implications to. You
really should consider VPN or Outlook Web Access using SSL.
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Jon Butler [mailto:[EMAIL
: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attempting to use MAPI over the internet
Keith,
If it was me I would refuse to set this up until I hand something in writing
from the manager who I had explained the security
Was watching on TV both the pop concert and carnival on Tuesday, wish I had
been one of the million in London, would have been one huge atmosphere.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 June 2002 15:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where
HI all,
I am after some clarification on how Outlook accesses public folders. I
understand the following so far, when Outlook opens it obtains from the DS
of the home server the public folder hierarchy which is replicated
throughout the organisation. When a user selects a particular folder how
Sorry I forgot to say it is Exch 5.5 SP 4, Outlook 2000
Rgds,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 May 2002 10:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Clients accessing public folder, clarification
HI all,
I am after some clarification on how
. open the folder by going through the process
of File | Open Users Folder and selecting them from the GAL anew.
--
Chris Scharff MVP, MCSE
MessageOne
512-652-4500 x244
Nana korobi, ya oki.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002
Hi all,
Exchange 5.5 SP4 running on W2k SP2, NT4 domains
Has anyone seen a situation whereby users are trying to access another's
calendar from Outlook using File open other users folder. In the past this
has been successful but is now failing saying that the information store is
not available,
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Opening other users calendar
When it worked in the past were you in a NT4.0 domain setup and now that you
switched to AD it now fails?
- Original Message -
From: Bendall, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24
.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other
this start happening?
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
I would generally agree with that, what I don't understand is why new
permissions work but old
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 May 2002 16:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opening other users calendar
Sounds like a name resolution issue. Target mailbox been moved, or modified
in any way?
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB
32TB and likely none of the currently shipping versions.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST files larger than 2GB
to success and truth. --Bruce Lee
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files larger than 2GB
John,
How can you remove the ability to create PST on the local machine? I am sure
Maybe I am going mad but I am sure somewhere on this list someone mentioned
Microsoft were developing pst that had unlimited capacity (or certainly more
than the current 2GB) is this true? What version of Outlook will support
these larger personal folders?
Regards,
Paul
Hi all,
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6A
I am trying to find a way to do a bulk import of changes to existing
mailboxes. The scenario is if the Primary Windows NT account and Obj-User
Attributes are \Unkown then it is unlikely anyone is using the mailbox, to
make sure we want to change the Display
I did some more digging and found the solution I needed to add ~Del to the
field to be imported.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 May 2002 12:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bulk Import
Hi all,
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 SP6A
I am
Have a look at the following Q article it is microsoft's white paper on the
subject.
Q266041
Regards,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Halliday S (ISeLS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 May 2002 15:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Change Service Account - Exch 5.5 SP4.0, Win2k
I have been asked to produce a list of active mailboxes for Exchange 5.5,
how would you go about this task? I guess I could do a dump of the Mailbox
resources for the last logon time, but I seem to remember this field is not
particularly reliable, in addition the service account seems to often
Hi all,
I have a problem on a couple of servers running Windows 2000 SP2, Exchange
5.5 SP4 with post SP4 hotfixes and ScanMail 3.52 with hotfix.
Here is the issue, we have recently been moving mailboxes from old Exchange
servers to new ones using the Move Mailbox method, while this was being
Hi all,
I am looking for recommendations on a book to learn VB scripting. I did a
very basic course some time ago on VB so decided by first steps into
scripting would probably be easier if I started with VB. I would class
myself as a beginer and would be interested in any recommendations.
TIA
Dear all,
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Windows 2000 SP2
I am in the process of consolidating part of an Exchange organisation. I
need to move the DRC from one site to another, I know this will cause a site
teardown. My understanding is that when the DRC is recreated to the new site
the distribution lists
Hope you guys can help with this query to checkout my chain of thought.
Exchange 5.5 Organisation, multi-ste and multi-server. Current servers are
located in a resource domain with a trust relationship to the user domain.
The resource domain needs to be retired to consolidate domains, the service
/exch_faq_appxe.htm). Making the change isn't
trivial, but it is possible.
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 1/16/2002 7:46 AM
Subject: Clarify Service account understanding, please
Hope you guys can help with this query to checkout my chain of thought
Yes, this is the way I do it maybe others, usually is with Outlook. Drag
you PF from its current location under All Public Folders into Favourites
(oops sorry American spelling Favorites) under Public Folders. Once this is
done you can select the PF from your Favorites and make it available
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
