--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Argue THAT, suckas... :-) :-) :-)
Interesting in a discussion of homosexual acts, you call
people suckas. Anything latent you want to discuss
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
richardhughes103@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
Are you saying anal sex has become the norm now!!! I would like to
know where you got that info from, I hoped it was still a minority
thing.
By the way did you know the anal sex craze started in the 70's when
censors in the US banned vaginal intercourse from movies, but there's
always a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis reavismarek@
wrote:
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd like a
little more information on the women-under-thirty agenda.
I am not sure
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The insult of the cartoons is to all muslims.
Oh, really?
You speak for all Muslims, do you?
The insult is directed to all muslims as it has Mohammed as its
object. If somebody feels insulted is another thing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Bottom line for me in all of this is that I think
some people just like to LABEL others. Isn't that
pretty much what this discussion has been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't understand why the Christians are so upset about Brokeback
Mountain. To me it shows the misery and destruction that homosexual
acts
Key West is nice this time of year. Try travelocity.On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:55 PM, feste37 wrote:My guess was that it would be not more than about two hours before someone pulled out this argument. I was just about right. Well done, Vaj!
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It might be worth considering, or finding out Feste, what are the karmic prerequisites for rebirth in a hell dimension.Homosexuality is a bioenergetic trait determined at the moment of sperm-egg fusion just as the doshas are. No therapy or practice is likely to change this basic fact. So you may
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many
of your points. You are right
http://www.quailhuntingschool.com/flash.php
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And just to stir the waters a bit before I leave
( insert evil laugh here ), has no one but me
noticed the relationship of the 'homophobe' thread
to the Amma/muslim/cartoon thread?
Essentially, feste *wrote a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many
of your points. You are right
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis reavismarek@
wrote:
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd like a
little
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't help
but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes himself. I
always assume he's just joking around when he posts bullshit just to
get a rise out of people.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Would you look more favorably on homosexuals if
they engaged only in oral sex and never in anal
sex?
And I keep forgetting to ask: In your opinion, do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Does that mean you believe cocksucking is part of the mouth's design
specifications?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around,
breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous
hairstyles upon the drab, heterosexual occupants.
Thats been happening for sometime now:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
himself. I always assume he's just joking around when he posts
bullshit just to get a
So how would you know?
The notion that because someone thinks homosexual anal intercourse
disgusting he must secretly want to do it himself is basically the kind of ad
hominem attack that the TM movement favors in dealing with people who
oppose it. It you disagree with something they do, you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
But its one of those disgusting acts that disgusting fags do so I
figured you were against that too. Like anal sex. You are against that
because its one of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
himself. I always assume he's just joking around when he posts
bullshit just to get
You like making things up, don't you? And the word fag that you employ
twice is your word, not mine. I did not and do not use it. I also make a
distinction between the person and the things that a person does that you
have missed.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
It means precisely what it says. Can't you read?
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Does that mean you believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how would you know?
The notion that because someone thinks homosexual anal intercourse
disgusting he must secretly want to do it himself is basically the
kind of ad hominem attack that the TM movement favors in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You like making things up, don't you? And the word fag that you
employ
twice is your word, not mine. I did not and do not use it. I also
make a
distinction between the person and the things that a person does
that you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The notion that because someone thinks homosexual anal intercourse
disgusting he must secretly want to do it himself is basically the
kind of ad hominem attack
I tend to agree on this. I find certain male hetrosexual
Don't miss Real Time with Bill Maher this weekend--absolutely hilarious.
Also the part on the Sunni Mahdi is very, very interesting.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:24 AM, feste37 wrote:So how would you know? The notion that because someone thinks homosexual anal intercourse disgusting he must secretly want to do it himself is basically the kind of ad hominem attack that the TM movement favors in dealing with people who oppose
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:52 AM, foufou_fl wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You like making things up, don't you? And the word "fag" that you employ twice is your word, not mine. I did not and do not use it. I also make a distinction between the
Sorry, I meant the Shi'a Mahdi.On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Vaj wrote:Don't miss Real Time with Bill Maher this weekend--absolutely hilarious. Also the part on the Sunni Mahdi is very, very interesting.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:24 AM, feste37 wrote:
So how would you know?
The notion that because someone thinks homosexual anal intercourse
disgusting he must secretly want to do it himself is basically the
kind of ad
On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:10 AM, foufou_fl wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The notion that because someone thinks homosexual anal intercourse disgusting he must secretly want to do it himself is basically the kind of ad hominem attack I tend to
On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:29 AM, foufou_fl wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:24 AM, feste37 wrote: So how would you know? The notion that because someone thinks homosexual anal intercourse disgusting he must secretly want to do it
That's another one that was sure to come soon, the Jesus may have been
gay thing. When so little is known for sure about a historical figure, you can
make him into anything you want. No one can prove you right or wrong, so
there's really no point to it, is there?
--- In
Sent to me by a couple of people:
Here's a very interesting question and answer from Maharishi. The
reporter asks a question I'd be reluctant to ask myself but I am
interested in the answer.
Question: Maharishi, so many guruspeople like yourselfhave given so
much thought to the direction of
It was as good as, as was your nasty little comment about Key West. In politics
this would be called an attempted smear.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Incidentally, my comment is not an ad hominem.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
It would make some gays more accepted and less marginalized. That's a good thing, no?Have you read the edited-out parts of Mark?On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:41 AM, feste37 wrote:That's another one that was sure to come soon, the "Jesus may have been gay" thing. When so little is known for sure
In comedy it's called a joke.On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:55 AM, feste37 wrote:It was as good as, as was your nasty little comment about Key West. In politics this would be called an attempted smear.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with anotherman
they way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think that gets the
point across without being too graphic.I am not a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would make some gays more accepted and less marginalized. That's a
good thing, no?
Not if you're just making it up, no. People who say Jesus may have been a
homosexual are simply trying to spin non-existent historical
Ah, make the smear and then claim it was a joke, huh? I'd call that dishonest.
And coming from a spiritual person such as yourself! I'm truly shocked.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In comedy it's called a joke.
On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:55 AM, feste37
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:30 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems to
me that a couple of people were boredbecause there weren't any arguments
going on, andso the moment an excuse for one appeared, theyleaped on
it, spewed out a label or two, andthen
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with another man
they way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think that gets
the point across without being too
graphic.That's
On Feb 25, 2006, at 12:21 PM, feste37 wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would make some gays more accepted and less marginalized. That's a good thing, no? Not if you're just making it up, no. People who say Jesus may have been a homosexual are
On Feb 25, 2006, at 12:26 PM, feste37 wrote:
Ah, make the smear and then claim it was a joke, huh? I'd call that
dishonest.
And coming from a spiritual person such as yourself! I'm truly
shocked.
Then consider it a koan.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those not living in Fairfield, who don't get to read the Weekly
Reader, this appeared in the Classifieds this week:
Almost enlightened ex-Mother Divine seeking man with lots of money
and no interest in sex.
Use your intuition to find me.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after the life
of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I remember rightly). They
express different ideological agendas. Whatever lost book you are referring
to is no more of a guide to the historical Jesus than the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sent to me by a couple of people:
Here's a very interesting question and answer from Maharishi. The
reporter asks a question I'd be reluctant to ask myself but I am
interested in the answer.
Question: Maharishi,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's another one that was sure to come soon, the Jesus
may have been gay thing. When so little is known for sure
about a historical figure, you can make him into anything
you want.
In this case, there's so little
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they
way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying anal sex has become the norm now!!! I would like to
know where you got that info from, I hoped it was still a minority
thing.
By the way did you know the anal sex craze started in the 70's
when
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@
wrote:
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd
like a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It means precisely what it says. Can't you read?
I can read. I was just curious what sentiment or thinking was behind
the lack of commentary. It's not a problem if you don't want to elaborate.
-- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
The insult of the cartoons is to all muslims.
Oh, really?
You speak for all Muslims, do you?
The insult is directed to all muslims as it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Isn't that a contradiction in terms?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral
sex.
Would you look more favorably on homosexuals if
they engaged only in oral sex and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:52 AM, foufou_fl wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
You like making things up, don't you? And the word fag that
you
employ
twice is your word, not mine. I
fou fou macoute
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:24 AM, feste37 wrote:
So how would you know?
The notion that because someone thinks homosexual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...maybe a 25 year old lesbian and I'm on board...
I think it was Lea DeLaria who said, I like penises. Just not on men.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonyff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
Sent to me by a couple of people:
Here's a very interesting question and answer from Maharishi. The
reporter asks a question I'd be reluctant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral
sex.
Would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
another man they
way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
shempmcgurk@ writes:
The Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard
Time,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
the life of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I
remember rightly). They express different ideological agendas.
Whatever lost book you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
Title: Traditional 'Sivaratri' Sunday nite, Morningstar 7:30pm
-- Forwarded Message
From: Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:50:25 -0600
To: Doug and Jennifer Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Traditional 'Sivaratri' Sunday nite, Morningstar 7:30pm
Oh, BTW,
Sunday Nite,
TM and all the other Hindu newage mumbo jumbo is of Satan, and if you
don't repent your sins and accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, God
WILL send you to Hell for eternity. Laugh all you want now, but you
won't be laughing when you stand before the Lord, wailing and gnashing
your teeth.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:29 AM, foufou_fl wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:24 AM, feste37 wrote:
So how would you know?
The notion that because someone
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
the life
of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I remember
rightly). They
express different ideological agendas. Whatever lost book you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TM and all the other Hindu newage mumbo jumbo is of Satan, and if
you
don't repent your sins and accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, God
WILL send you to Hell for eternity. Laugh all you want now, but you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
The insult of the cartoons is to all muslims.
Oh, really?
You
http://tinyurl.com/knqsv
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
on 2/25/06 3:20 PM, foufou_fl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this comment of yours pretty much sums it all up...and I agree
with it wholeheartedly: no one is insulted unless they let it insult
them.
Perhaps. Still canadians are notorious for having small dicks and they
cum quickly
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:10:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well,
actually the Hebrew Scriptures are exactly,precisely that, as far as
Judaism is concerned.Have you really never heard of the Covenant
betweenGod and His Chosen People?And as to rabbis
Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a
tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical. Nothing is
known or will ever be known about the sexuality of Jesus of Nazareth. But just
supposing it were, it wouldn't upset me in the slightest,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_astute_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TM and all the other Hindu newage mumbo jumbo is of Satan, and if you
don't repent your sins and accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior, God
WILL send you to Hell for eternity.
Riiight... the God of the OT is
Of course. And btw, change your moniker. You sound like a fucking French
poodle.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please keep in mind that not long ago, FFL got reclassified as
Adult, which created various problems, and which took
considerable effort to correct. This recent topic has certainly
been a legitimate one to discuss,
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:56:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shemp That's the only verse, from Leviticus, that I remember off
hand. I pretty sure there is more. The Bible wasn't written in
legalese as a contract between man and God. Could you
on 2/25/06 4:16 PM, Alex Stanley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please keep in mind that not long ago, FFL got reclassified as
Adult, which created various problems, and which took
considerable effort to correct. This
In a message dated 2/25/06 2:00:21 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well,
actually, isn't that precisely what the Talmud is... basically,
volume after volume after volume of "legalese" of the contract
between man and God?Between Jews and God, yes, indeed,
In a message dated 2/25/06 3:16:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How do I
wail with my teeth? I want to get started now, so that I have some
kind of lead when the time comes.
First of all, you have to put your dentures back
in.
To subscribe, send a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 2/25/06 4:16 PM, Alex Stanley at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
Please keep in mind that not long ago, FFL got reclassified as
Adult, which
OK, good answer.
You were sounding like a fundie there for awhile,
with your ridiculous bit about organs being designed
for one thing and not the other as a reason to oppose
homosexuality and how homosexuals were all going to
hell.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:10:06 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, actually the Hebrew Scriptures are exactly,
precisely that, as far as Judaism is concerned.
Have you really never heard of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:56:16 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shemp That's the only verse, from Leviticus, that I remember
off
hand. I
pretty sure there is more. The Bible wasn't written
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good detective work, Judy. I guessed that Vaj's scholarship
was as thin as a tart's negligee
P.S.: No detective work required, BTW, other than
a quick Google for the exact quote from Clementine's
letter. The nature of the
On Feb 25, 2006, at 5:07 PM, feste37 wrote:I guessed that Vaj's scholarship was as thin as a tart's negligee, but the question you ask below is a hypothetical. Nothing is known or will ever be known about the sexuality of Jesus of Nazareth. If you had a question, you should ask. Judy makes the
In a message dated 2/25/06 5:22:13 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me
ask it this way: Do you think they wanted torape Lot's visitors because
they were horny? Inother words, was the point sexual
gratification?
Would it matter? Would the act be justified
In a message dated 2/25/06 5:28:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Law
as laid down in the Torah was in what amountedto legalese of the
time.
I wouldn't presume to know that. However it might be funny to
hear Leviticus redone in modern day legalese.
To
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
