--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose it could all be seen as an enlightening
example of the down side of democracy - the leat
intelligent and morally most corrupt
common denominator sets the standard :-)
Either that or a bunch of dueling egos
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd rather descirbe myself as the sole catalyst, though I'd
prefer to think of it in terms of shining some light in a
very dark place - with the result that a variety of nocturnal
? bugs in panic realized daybreak is
(Jaan Suurküla [= big (suur) village (küla; cf.
Sanskrit kula)] is an M.D. of apparently Estonian ancestry.)
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:51:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jaan Suurkula [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: You may have vitamin B12-deficiency Introduction
Dear Friends,
B12 is very important for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ wrote:
I'd rather descirbe myself as the sole catalyst, though I'd
prefer to think of it in terms of shining some light in a
very dark place - with the
http://tinyurl.com/k2wkn
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iDk17A/hOaOAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ wrote:
I'd rather descirbe myself as the sole catalyst, though I'd
prefer to think of it in terms of shining some light in a
very dark place - with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ wrote:
I suppose it could all be seen as an enlightening
example of the down side of democracy - the leat
intelligent and morally most corrupt
common
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@
wrote:
I'd rather descirbe myself as the sole catalyst, though I'd
prefer to think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@
wrote:
I'd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
Remember that old bone we were chewing on?
Judy:
The contradiction is that according to science,
your constraints, your sense of exercising an
act of will to overcome them, and your enjoyment
of all that are all *determined*, because the
behavior of the elementary particles that make
your mind,
Run the video at:
http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/06/make_podcast_rube_goldberg_con_2.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/h3p5f
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember that old bone we were chewing on?
Indeed I do. I just got back home, and almost the
first thing I did was haul out Quantum Questions
to reread the entire The 'I' That Is God essay
from which I took the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A great example of this was when he came here, sometime in the
late 70s
I think, he apparently made the offhand remark that someone's sari
was
really nice, or something to that effect. Next time he came--most
of
Great points. Thanks for taking the time. I will take a little time
to make sure I let them sink in.
I can't resist this one to start:
The irony is that if what you're calling the group 'I'
is in fact the case, it means you are infinitely more
than just the currently living bodymind called
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/15/06 10:58 AM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
This is a frequent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great points. Thanks for taking the time. I will take a little
time
to make sure I let them sink in.
I can't resist this one to start:
The irony is that if what you're calling the group 'I'
is in fact
With the caveat that expansion beyond limitations is an action more
of ongoing comprehension and appreciation, I agree that it is the
details that give sweetness to life (leading me to conclude that
whoever said, the devil is in the details was the devil himself).
It is pretty obvious to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great points. Thanks for taking the time. I will take a little
time
to make sure I let them sink in.
I can't resist this one to start:
The irony is that if what you're calling the group 'I'
is in fact
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
This is so abstract it's hard to get across, but do
you remember I said my experience of development of
consciousness was one of increasing transparency? Part
of that is that limitations become transparent.
From the New York Times;
June 18, 2006
'Star Trek' Fans, Deprived of a Show, Recreate the Franchise on
Digital Video
By DANNY HAKIM
MASON NECK STATE PARK, Va. Paul Sieber was wearing a Star Trek
uniform in the deep Virginia woods when he found himself surrounded
by a leathery-looking
I can't resist suggesting that perhaps the concept
that seemed so powerful and important *was itself
limited* as it existed in your mind at the time,
and that at a certain point you had grown beyond
what it meant to you then--but for various reasons,
instead of letting the concept expand along
Does this mean that I can take my time digitally adding you to the
Holy Tradition portrait?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
This is so abstract it's hard to get across, but do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't resist suggesting that perhaps the concept
that seemed so powerful and important *was itself
limited* as it existed in your mind at the time,
and that at a certain point you had grown beyond
what it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean that I can take my time digitally adding you to the
Holy Tradition portrait?
sheesh
Yeah, I think you can back-burner it for the next
few lives...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
OK. Whatever the basis for your leaving the movement,
what I find curious is that the way you talk about what
you say no longer appeals to you, it wouldn't appeal to
me either. It seems sort of stunted and shallow and
two-dimensional and colorless, just a lot of empty words.
I will have to give
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
So much of what you said seems to be a natural pattern of growing up
with our ideas whatever they are. I suspect that I am neither
uniquely flawed nor gifted in intellectual awareness, in or out of
TMO.
On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:18 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] So much of what you said seems to be a natural pattern of growing up with our ideas whatever they are. I suspect that I am neither uniquely flawed nor gifted in
Well, you also made it sound as though anyone and everyone in the TMO
was a liar as Andrew Skolnick quoted you in his JAMA article:
Are you a teacher? Is it news for you that people in the movement
lie, especially to reporters? I was speaking about my experience. Is
it different for you?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:18 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
[...]
So much of what you said seems to be a natural pattern of growing up
with our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, you also made it sound as though anyone and everyone in the TMO
was a liar as Andrew Skolnick quoted you in his JAMA article:
Are you a teacher? Is it news for you that people in the movement
lie,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, you also made it sound as though anyone and everyone in the TMO
was a liar as Andrew Skolnick quoted you in his JAMA article:
Are you a teacher? Is it news for you that people in the movement
lie,
On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:34 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:"Well, you also made it sound as though anyone and everyone in the TMO was a liar as Andrew Skolnick quoted you in his JAMA article:" Are you a teacher? Is it news for you that people in the movement lie, especially to reporters? I was
No, I was not a researcher.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 2006, at 5:34 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
Well, you also made it sound as though anyone and everyone in the TMO
was a liar as Andrew Skolnick quoted you in his JAMA article:
Well, no I assumed you weren't. What I was asking was there any hint that some of the research had been "fudged" for PR purposes?On Jun 18, 2006, at 6:42 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:No, I was not a researcher. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 18, 2006,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Great points. Thanks for taking the time. I will take a little
time
to make sure I let them sink in.
I can't resist this one
Both statements are accurate to my experience. Protecting the group's
more controversial beliefs from outsiders did not usually cause me
conflict. The end justified the means. This point was important to
Andrew because he couldn't understand how a person could willfully
deceive JAMA about their
I can't think of any examples of that because I believed the research
was valid. Since then I have read perspectives of the research that
exposes the weaknesses, but while in the group I was not interested in
this perspective at all. There was never a sincere commitment to the
scientific method,
Thanks, previous contributors, for posting your respective opinions
on the relationship between free will and determinism; a topic in a
recent New Scientist article. Regarding the question as to whether
the mind aspect to free will is or can be somehow separate from the
determinism of
---Forgot to paste in the paragraph. Here it is:
Free will - you only think you have it
04 May 2006
Zeeya Merali
Magazine issue 2550
Underneath the uncertainty of quantum mechanics could lie a deeper
reality in which, shockingly, all our actions are predetermined
WE MUST believe in free
Interesting, I would like to read the rest. Can you help me with the
mind body question?
In Essence, Buddhist
is Naturalist but not necessarily materialist; but Buddhists
are
not inclined to separate mind from matter.
Do they think of it like the traditions that posit a mental body?
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues . Can you
help me with the
mind body question?
In Essence, Buddhist
is Naturalist but not necessarily materialist; but Buddhists
are
not inclined to separate mind from matter.
Do they think of it like the traditions that posit a
Thanks man, that was really interesting.
or, if one
refers to the Judaic Hebrew texts (Ec: 9:5), the Soul IS the body,
since when you're dead, you're in the grave, eaten by worms
So now I'm Jewish above the waist too!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL
Title: Converting analog audio to digital
Im taking tabla lessons and I record them. How can I patch a regular analog tape recorder into my Mac or PC so as to create mp3s of each separate rhythm Im studying? What hardware and software do I need? Would I be better off getting a digital tape
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I¹m taking tabla lessons and I record them. How can I patch a regular analog
tape recorder into my Mac or PC so as to create mp3¹s of each separate
rhythm I¹m studying? What hardware and software do I need? Would I be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I
left the article at home and forgot my password, so I can only copy
what's in the Newscientist website: the first paragraph.
I sure would love it if you could copy in more
when you have access to the article
Vaj wrote:
What I was asking was there any hint
that some of the research had been fudged for PR purposes?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't think of any examples of that because I believed the
research was valid. Since then I have
There are actually quite a few factual inaccuracies
in that earlier alt.m.t quote. Are there any of them
you'd like to correct now?
Nope. But thanks for asking.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vaj wrote:
What I was asking was there any hint
Fun little video from the Electronic Freedom Foundation.
http://www.eff.org/corrupt/
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/jDk17A/gOaOAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Converting analog audio to digital
Thanks. I dont have an iPod and Id rather no buy one. Can I just go to Radio Shack and buy something that would let me patch my cheap tape recorder into my Mac or PC? If I accomplished that step, what software would I need to
I think you can use a line in cable that connects your headphone jack
of your recorder, to the mic jack on your computer. You use your PC
recorder to make a wave file. Most computer soundcards can record.It
will be a wave file though so you need a converter if you need it to
be MP3. But for
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Converting analog audio to digital
on 6/18/06 10:42 PM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you can use a line in cable that connects your headphone jack
of your recorder, to the mic jack on your computer. You use your PC
recorder to make a
Have you ever used the PC recorder from your built-in computer mic?
The line in uses the same system. But is may be too short a recording
for your needs. To split it up you do need some audio editing
software. I use Sound Forge but that is overkill for your needs here.
There must be some
Get Amadeus, first off.
Then, a quick-n-dirty a/d converter is the iMic. I use a superior Edirol UA-1A
connected to
a mixing board.
On your Mac, create a new user that has no haxies running. Run Amadeus from
that
personality so that your hard drive is as unbusy as possible while you are
54 matches
Mail list logo
