--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie msilver1951@
wrote:
I figured out the unified field theory. It works like this. The
universe that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Maharishi continued his address to the Second Annual David Lynch
Weekend held 25-28 May at Maharishi University of Management in
Fairfield, Iowa, USA by describing the plans for bringing Vedic
Pandits to create
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
THEN HERE'S A SUGGESTION, TOOTS, SEE THE ACTUAL SHOW AND
GET YOUR OWN OPINION ABOUT IT.
Why? What I'm interested in is the viewer reaction
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie msilver1951@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie
msilver1951@ wrote:
I figured
your universe doesn't interfere with mine - I find it does!
Or, even if you are just in MY universe, how come then I can't get
rid of you, if I want to. (nb YOU here stands for anything - eg
suffering etc). If I create my universe then it's gone out of
control, like in a scary SciFi movie.
But
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as we
inquire into and integrate
Christ, this whole dialog is a breath of fresh air. Ron, (Tanmay) you
were born for this moment.
lurk
Hello,
Nice to see a nice comment. I have a lot of enthusiasm for what is
taking place. It is my seva, and it is a part of the whole process
that one that is in a path is doing seva, to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote:
I can't deny my own experience.
I am a TM teacher who has directly experienced Guru Dev during TM
initiations and otherwise. I know of at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears to be
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
On Jun 11, 2007, at 9:52 PM, Ron wrote:
I wonder if this Guru would enjoy Byron Katie... :-)
* I doubt it. I've come across Swami G
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those two things ( for me) are of the utmost importance in order for
significant progress- and emphasized- Sat Guru and one to one. For
those who have come across this, we can say that the universe has
offered a choice. Swami G
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
And which lies would those be, Vaj?
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
On Jun 11, 2007, at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
THEN HERE'S A SUGGESTION, TOOTS, SEE THE ACTUAL SHOW AND
GET YOUR OWN
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Those two things ( for me) are of the utmost importance in order for
significant progress- and emphasized- Sat Guru and one to one. For
those who
Tom Hickey answers this question in great detail in a book I've been
proofreading.ONLY ONE IS is the core truth of almost every wisdom
tradition. But as TomT says only YOU can experience it.
Tom HIckey is a very clear philosopher who has also experienced that
nondualistic state and as
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
And which lies would those be, Vaj?
The ones exposed here (sorry, accidentally
http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/070406_past_lives.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
This would be worth adding to the list archives Ron.
Veritas liberat.
Hello,
Well, As was suggested by Swami G , one honors where
So you've tried it?
Is it really faster that IE?
On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:41 AM, bob_brigante wrote:
Looks like a better browser than IE7, but does not support Yahoo's
newest mail, so I have to use both IE7 and Safari:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/12/technology/12apple.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
there is no way a full initiate would be wearing white - and while
he may claim Guru Dev as his Guru, like stated before there is
no way a Full initiate and most certainly a Shakaracharya that
holds the rules of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of Mahesh
unravel once again.
Just one minute, Vaj my man, but if *lies* are unraveling, wouldn't
that result in them revealing their truth? And what is wrong with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
there is no way a full initiate would be wearing white - and
while
he may claim Guru Dev as his Guru, like stated before there is
On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
horselaugh
I don't want to interrupt your horse imitation,
but it's not quite the same. I've seen over half
of the episodes of the series, and had just watched
a twenty-minute Net film of the highlights of the
final episode, *in addition to*
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
No surprises here, but good to see in print as the lies of
Mahesh
unravel once again.
And which lies
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 9:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
horselaugh
I don't want to interrupt your horse imitation,
but it's not quite the same. I've seen over half
of the episodes of the series, and had just watched
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as
we
inquire into and integrate
Thanks for posting this Vaj.
One interesting area of Neuro linguistic Programming was something
they call sub-modalities. These are all the internal distinctions
we make to tell one type of thought or memory from another. We code
thoughts with internal visual cues like image qualities,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I can offer a little food for thought here. There are no rules
that say one that is enlightened must keep it secret. I have been
saying things are direct and to the point here in my path. So, for a
starter, one can ask
On Jun 12, 2007, at 10:14 AM, authfriend wrote:
It's interesting that clever rationalization and a worldview
based on self-reinforcing, indoctrinated set of beliefs held in
place from lack of external exposure can lead to delusions
which, to the deluded, seem real, convincing and even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I've seen over half
of the episodes of the series, and had just watched
a twenty-minute Net film of the highlights of the
final episode, *in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
I've seen over half
of the episodes of the series, and had just watched
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It was pretty obvious what
internal qualities we used to internally code true experiences
from fiction. We attempted to make the made up story as much
like the true ones as we could. I got to the point where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron sidha7001@ wrote:
Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as we
inquire into and integrate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two others within the Dasanami
System, only Brahmins can
Interesting NLP story.
One of the meditative processes I've found very valuable was a
technique which actually projects habitual subtle and super-subtle
thoughts into three dimensional space, to the extent that, sans
external testing cues, you could not tell it from from waking
reality.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
By the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting NLP story.
One of the meditative processes I've found very valuable was a
technique which actually projects habitual subtle and super-subtle
thoughts into three dimensional space, to the extent that, sans
On Jun 12, 2007, at 10:47 AM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:06 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting NLP story.
One of the meditative processes I've found very valuable was a
technique which actually projects habitual subtle and super-subtle
thoughts into three
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'
Hank Plante
Reporting
(CBS 5) BERKELEY A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks
military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military proposal
to create a hormone bomb that could purportedly turn enemy soldiers
into homosexuals and
I'm not sure I fully grasp what this involves. It sounds very
interesting. In NLP we used something that may have a little to do
with what you are talking about. It concerned practicing your
perceptual position. You would first run a memory as a movie,
dissociated from it. Then you would take
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
[snip]
Nope, but I've never expressed a critical
opinion about it, either (just as I have not
done so with either The Sopranos or
Apocalypto, you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct experience being in that living tradition
Au contraire, she claimed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My reading of Byron Katie is that she is primarily focussed on the
message, and analysis in life situations, of loving what is, not
loving what IS .
I'm currently finding there is no difference. Love what is, and we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:06 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Interesting NLP story.
One of the meditative processes I've found very valuable was a
technique which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Pentagon Confirms It Sought To Build A 'Gay Bomb'
Hank Plante
Reporting
(CBS 5) BERKELEY A Berkeley watchdog organization that tracks
military spending said it uncovered a strange U.S. military
proposal to
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:34 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct experience being in that
On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:05 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:06 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Interesting NLP story.
One of the meditative
In a message dated 6/12/07 10:23:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Throughout history we have had so many brave men and women who are
gay and lesbian serving the military with distinction,gay and lesbian s
Kors of Equality California. So, it's just offensive that
Judy today:
Nope, but I've never expressed a critical
opinion about it, either (just as I have not
done so with either The Sopranos or
Apocalypto, you see).
Judy a few months ago (stuff in brackets in the
2nd paragraph and all of the Subject title and
final paragraph:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unlike Balsekar i am not going to say all is perfect as it is
- and if you are a murderer then that is quite fine it is perfect
and just be what you are.
Personally, I find Balsekar's perspective refreshing. While I haven't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie msilver1951@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy:
Nope, but I've never expressed a critical
opinion about it, either (just as I have not
done so with either The Sopranos or
Apocalypto, you see).
Judy a few months ago (stuff in brackets in the
http://nanyar.googlepages.com/nagarjuna%27snoes
The Eight Negations
anirodham anutpâdam anucchedam aúâúvatam
anekârtham anânârtham anirgamam anâgamam
(a-nirodham an-utpaadam an-ucchedam a-shaashvatam
an-eka-[a?]artham a-naanaa-[a?]artham[?] a-nirgamam an-aagamam)
| no dissolution - no
Judy wrote:
I look forward to using the term bigot in
future posts here when referring to you,
secure in the knowledge that you (a profes-
sional editor, after all) have declared that
the use of this term is not critical.
Barry wrote:
Or perhaps, in light of the unprovoked attack
And Safari has some security issues:
http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9728500-7.html
I highly doubt that Apple puts as much headcount nor does Microsoft as
the headcount that has worked on Firefox. They're fighting a losing
game. I would suggest that Linux distros have far more head count at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy today:
Nope, but I've never expressed a critical
opinion about it, either (just as I have not
done so with either The Sopranos or
Apocalypto, you see).
Judy a few months ago (stuff in brackets
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could not be initiated as a swami--as Sw. G sees it from
her direct
Rick, would you consider banning people from FFL who
continue to denigrate others, perpetuate these
mindless personal arguments and just waste everybody's
time with these very personal posts. Individually,
when these posters stay on task, they can have some
pretty interesting posts, but this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and Swami G's comments was that since
Mahesh could
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Within two hours of your arrival back on FFF, you
had made one post calling Vaj a liar, and another
slamming me by bringing up a three-year-old
grudge that you're obviously still fuming over.
I'm pointing it out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi thanks for the quick response. Still I feel that she is tiptoeing
around the points. These points or rather my main point is, that
within the Saraswati Order, as well as two others within the Dasanami
System, only
On Jun 12, 2007, at 3:24 PM, boo_lives wrote:
So you think GD just
dumped him, saying: you are not a Brahmin, you are only a Brahmachari?
No, he dumped him, saying: Hit the road, Jack.
I find this logic ridiculous and even arrogant.
Me too. I mean, GD really could have gone to the trouble
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Judy:
Nope, but I've never expressed a critical
opinion about it, either (just as I have not
done so with either The Sopranos or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't know what this thread is about, but considering you,
Turquoise, have never apologized for some of the most
disgusting and hateful attacks (against Judy) I have ever
seen, you have no credibility about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Don't know what this thread is about, but considering you,
Turquoise, have never apologized for some of the most
disgusting and hateful
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@
wrote:
Don't know what this thread is about, but considering you,
On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:24 PM, boo_lives wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
snip
What I was getting from Ron and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Don't know what this thread is about, but considering you,
Turquoise, have never apologized for some of the most
disgusting and hateful
http://enlightenmenttoday.com/articles/volume1/issue4/index.html
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you've tried it?
Is it really faster that IE?
On Jun 12, 2007, at 12:41 AM, bob_brigante wrote:
Looks like a better browser than IE7, but does not support Yahoo's
newest mail, so I have to use both IE7 and Safari:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
Maharishi continued his address to the Second Annual David Lynch
Weekend held 25-28 May at Maharishi University of Management in
Fairfield,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gibson probably also thinks the Founding Fathers of America were
Christians, when in fact most of them were FreeMasons intent on
establishing the Novus Ordo Seclorum (see your dollar notes ) New
Secular Order
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@
wrote:
Don't know what this thread is about, but considering you,
Just want to echo Nablusoss' appreciation of all the information you
posted and ask a related question: the Saraswati order is one of 3
that you said are only for Brahmins; what are the other 2? Also,
I've understood that at least some of the Dashanami orders are
entirely defunct, such as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Gibson probably also thinks the Founding Fathers of America were
Christians, when in fact most of them were FreeMasons intent on
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only correctly
accorded a Hatha Yogi? Certainly, Guru Dev was spoken of as a Siddha
Yogi although no account I've read says anything about whether he did
or did not do Hatha Yoga.
And
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Gibson probably also thinks the Founding Fathers of America were
Christians, when in fact most of them were FreeMasons intent on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Gibson probably also thinks the Founding Fathers of America were
Christians, when in fact most of them were FreeMasons intent on
establishing the Novus Ordo Seclorum (see your dollar
notes ) New
Secular Order
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Seclorum disputed:
Actually, your own quote states: Secular -- from the adjective
Saecularis: worldly, secular, of the age
In other words it means secular also.
Saecularis MEANS worldy, secular, so what
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:22 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: How Judy deals with life
Rick, would you consider banning people from FFL who
continue to denigrate others,
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:22 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: How Judy deals with
life
Rick, would you consider
On Jun 12, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Marek Reavis wrote:
Vaj, I've never heard how Maharishi received (or appropriated)
the Yogi suffix, but do you believe that it is only correctly
accorded a Hatha Yogi?
Not necessarily a hatha yogi, but a practitioner of yoga-darshana
(which includes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Seclorum disputed:
Actually, your own quote states: Secular -- from the adjective
Saecularis: worldly, secular, of the age
In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
This is what Peter is talking about, and I agree thorougly. But it
is not going to stop. It is a 10 yr. plus habit, and an addiction
like most others.
lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
Help me Obewan.
I was reading through a few posts and since I'm new to the forum I
just couldn't figure out who this swami-g was. I clicked on a link
provide by a sidha7001 and it took me to a website with a picture
of some pujari doing an agni-hotra. The pujari's ritual looked nice
but I was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The phrase is NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM, not NOVUS ORDO SAECULARIS.
SECLORUM
Is this like when Buddy Hackett visited the Vatican and asked too many
questions about the opulance he saw there - the Pope finally had
enough and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, your own quote states: Secular -- from the
adjective
Saecularis: worldly, secular, of the age
In other words it means secular also.
No, SAECULARIS means secular and SECLORUM means of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. Judy has a bigger dick than any of her detractors on this
board. its a hoot!:-)
You don't say! That along with her horse laughs make for a very pretty
picture indeed.
On second thought, don't bother consulting Wikipedia, as apparently
someone with no understanding of Latin has revised it inaccurately to
support your secular stance since I first gave the link. They did
forget to take out the line which says, correctly, The word seclorum
does not mean
(snip)
Please help me Obewan, I'm just so empty.
empty
Remember, empty, that the emtiness can only be filled with the fullness
of love;
The more spaciousness there is, the more love is possible.
The more possibilities.
The more still you are, the more dynamic.
When you can breath in
Hello, I forwarded this to Swami G, there have been really a lot of
eamils today.
Anyway, what is a Braman? Swami G has pointed out in the past what a
Braman really is, as opposed to how it is practiced today- something
like what american gem society did to clasify birthstones in order to
sell
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
