> > Jason wrote:
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > There are clear, distinct, differences between
> > 'materialism' 'naturalism' and 'reductionism'.
> >
> > Nagel probably uses these terms interchangably and with
> > some ambiguity.
> >
--- "authfriend" wrote:
>
> Wrong again, Jason.
>
>
> > 'Materialism' i
> > Jason wrote
> >
> > 'Quantum field', 'Scientific principles' and
> > mathematical principles are in fact, abstract,
> > intangible aspects of nature.
> >
> > You are correct in saying that there is a worthwhile
> > difference, between 'materialism' and 'naturalism'.
> >
> >
--- "compost1uk"
> > Jason wrote:
> > > Xeno, it's not clear what Nagel exactly means by
> > > "materialist".
>
> Judy wrote:
> > Yes, it is. It's one who believes "that everything can
> > be accounted for at the most basic level by the physical
> > sciences, extended to include biology."
>
> > Jason wrote:
>
> > > > --- "salyavin808" wrote:
> > >
> > > --snip--
> > >
> > > While I do not have time to enter the fray here at the moment,
> > > I did notice this thread about 'Mind and Cosmos' which I have
> > > *not* read but which seemingly brings up once again the 'hard
> > > problem of consciousne
The answer we gotten before from some here is, "random brain activity".
From: "waybac...@yahoo.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2013 7:46 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Chopra nothing without Maharis
be careful not to be too sanctimonious. Â
>
>
>
> From: Share Long sharelong60@...
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothin
ful not to be too sanctimonious. Â
>
>
>
> From: Share Long sharelong60@...
> To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing witho
ounselor. That seems adult to me.
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:22 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
Sometimes you must speak another person&
Well, surf's up! why stay in boat?! cowabunga!
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:34 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
(Wo)Man Over
August 20, 2013 11:19 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
>
>
>
> Â
> Fuck that! :-)
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
> >
> > Yep, I still think it's possible to set boundaries without using
> > po
yes, yes dear Doc, whatever floats your boat!
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
Fuck that! :
ublic and work on it in private
> or with my counselor. That seems adult to me.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "doctordumbass@..."
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:22 AM
> Subject: [Fairfiel
to me.
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:22 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
Sometimes you must speak another person's language to communicate with them.
Mahar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
> Ah, right, thank you, Judy! To which I responded something like "I said *may*
> as that was my experience. Yours may be something entirely different." And
> again, to clarify, I reiterate that I was not thinking about you when I wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
> >
> > No, it's not too late, Judy; thank you; I much appreciate it. Yes, part of
> > me did get a kick out it all, and it was blissful -- and then my physiology
> > got a KI
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
>
> No, it's not too late, Judy; thank you; I much appreciate it. Yes, part of me
> did get a kick out it all, and it was blissful -- and then my physiology got
> a KICK out of it all on a whole new level! :-D
>
> You are quite right abo
hows
them
> > > immediately that there is a boundary there. Not something one
would expect
> > > to have to do around adults, setting social boundaries, but some
are
> > > childish in their state of emotional development. Sorry if it
looks ugly
> > > fr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita" wrote:
>
> At rounding courses in the 1970s when we were shown videotapes of
> Maharishi there were often long pauses after a question was asked - and
> I mean really long pauses - before Maharishi came up with an answer. I
> used to feel the ten
lf serves equally well. It is not said
> in
> > > judgment, but rather in context. An attempt at behavioral
> modification, as
> > > would be used on a very stubborn and angry adult child. It shows them
> > > immediately that there is a boundary there. Not something on
; > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Judy and Xeno, I'm learning, especially here on FFL, that it's
> > best NEVER to blast someone unkindly. Whether
abusive person? If so, then all I can say is that I have seen no
> > > empirical evidence of that here on FFL!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: authfriend
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> &g
At rounding courses in the 1970s when we were shown videotapes of
Maharishi there were often long pauses after a question was asked - and
I mean really long pauses - before Maharishi came up with an answer. I
used to feel the tension rising and sometimes said to myself: "Christ!
He's not going to b
are Long
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Judy and Xeno, I'm learning, especially here on FFL, that it's
> best NEVER to blast someone unkindly. Whether it's *important to* reminds
> me of something posted a few weeks ago: that evil takes over w
go: that evil takes over when good
> > > > people become prideful. Furthermore, I think it's possible to express
> > > > one's opinion, set boundaries, etc. without being unkind. Because
> > > > really, exactly what does unkindness accomplish? Does i
Because really,
> > > exactly what does unkindness accomplish? Does it produce kindness in the
> > > abusive person? If so, then all I can say is that I have seen no
> > > empirical evidence of that here on FFL!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
here on FFL!
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________
> > From: authfriend
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
> >
> >
Interesting the question M answers at the end - A TM teacher says that with TM
there is no Guru (master) - Chela (disciple) relationship.
M responds that it is more like a history professor, a purely instructional
relationship with the student, "otherwise the whole complication would be
unscie
sical symptoms. Meanwhile as I'm sure you know,
> Love's got you by the scruff of the neck and won't let go (-:
>
>
>
> From: RoryGoff
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 10:12 AM
> Subj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> You are welcome! My body surprises me, unpleasantly sometimes. The best thing
> to heal it is lie down, and let the attention go to the pain, without
> thinking about it.
Yes, that is my normal approach, too. This one was "Abb
No, it's not too late, Judy; thank you; I much appreciate it. Yes, part of me
did get a kick out it all, and it was blissful -- and then my physiology got a
KICK out of it all on a whole new level! :-D
You are quite right about my projecting an invulnerability; that is indeed a
part of me, bu
I'd like to, but what happens if the teacher catches me passing notes?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> DrD/Jim--
>
> Rory has apparently chosen not to read my posts, so if I
> may, I'd like to ask you to pass this on to him:
>
> He has twice seriously misrepresent
; From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 6:36 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
>
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" authfriend@ wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
>
> Judy, I appreciate your overture. No, I was not reading any
> posts for a few days there -- I was otherwise occupied, what
> with the ER and so on, and trying to take it easy -- and
> have not been following things religiously since, so I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
> > > >
>
013 10:12 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > As some of the symptoms persisted over several days I finally
s best
> > > > NEVER to blast someone unkindly. Whether it's *important to* reminds me
> > > > of something posted a few weeks ago: that evil takes over when good
> > > > people become prideful. Furthermore, I think it's possible to express
> > >
tc. without being unkind. Because really,
> > > exactly what does unkindness accomplish? Does it produce kindness in the
> > > abusive person? If so, then all I can say is that I have seen no
> > > empirical evidence of that here on FFL!
> > >
> > >
19, 2013 9:53 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
> >
> >
> > As some of the s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > As some of the symptoms persisted over several days I finally went
> > >
Judy, I appreciate your overture. No, I was not reading any posts for a few
days there -- I was otherwise occupied, what with the ER and so on, and trying
to take it easy -- and have not been following things religiously since, so I
must have missed your post. I did not mean to imply here that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
> >
> >
> > As some of the symptoms persisted over several days I finally went
> > to the clinic and they sent me to the ER, but the EKG, blood tests
> > and lung X-ra
___
> From: authfriend
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
>
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
&
DrD/Jim--
Rory has apparently chosen not to read my posts, so if I
may, I'd like to ask you to pass this on to him:
He has twice seriously misrepresented what I said to him.
I corrected him the first time, and he appeared to
understand and thanked me for the "clarification."
Then he misrepresent
: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
I could never claim to scope out someone that well, I have to hedge my bets
when I try to do that. I was never good at it.
About Buck. Yes, he is rather unusual. I tend to think of him as something out
the mid-19th century, way before even my time. Share
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" wrote:
>
>
> As some of the symptoms persisted over several days I finally went
> to the clinic and they sent me to the ER, but the EKG, blood tests
> and lung X-rays (don't ask me why they felt those were necessary)
> came back clean, much to my
sible to express one's
> > > opinion, set boundaries, etc. without being unkind. Because really,
> > > exactly what does unkindness accomplish? Does it produce kindness in the
> > > abusive person? If so, then all I can say is that I have seen no
> > >
I'm pretty sure it's no longer contagious. Hope you
and Rena and the whole banana gang are well and happy. Share
From: RoryGoff
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:57 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing wit
ries, etc. without being unkind. Because really, exactly
> > what does unkindness accomplish? Does it produce kindness in the abusive
> > person? If so, then all I can say is that I have seen no empirical evidence
> > of that here on FFL!
> >
> >
> >
>
ieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
>
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> That may well be true. I don&
al evidence of that here on FFL!
>
>
>
>
> From: authfriend authfriend@...
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
>
>
>
> Â
> ---
ep my psychological
speculations to myself. At least, for now (-:
From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 6:36 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In Fairfiel
___
From: authfriend
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:46 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
snip
That may well be true. I don't think one o
5 per week, not so much.
From: Ann
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:01 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
ot so much.
From: Ann
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 9:01 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In Fairfield
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >>
> >>> As I believe I said above, "You can imagine to a certain
> >>> extent what it would be like for *you* to be a bat or to
> >>> be your identical twin br
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> To make the question more precise, for any given person on FFL, in your
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>>
>> To make the question more precise, for any given person on FFL, in your own
>> estimation, based on the replies you get and the posts directed to you
>> either d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >>> --- In Fai
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> As I believe
___
> > From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:36 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
> >
> >
> >
> > Â
> > --- In FairfieldLi
I bet she'd be too old for you (-:
From: salyavin808
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:11 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > You should probably read the essay:
> > >
> > > http://organizations.utep.edu/Por
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
>
> > As I believe I said above, "You can imagine to a certain
> > extent what it
airfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:36 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
>
>
>
> Â
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > You should probably read the essay:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> As I believe I said above, "You can imagine to a certain
> extent what it would be like for *you* to be a bat or to
> be your identical twin brother..."
>
> No
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> Share writes: And there is enlightenment which is thought to be the
ultimate in questions and answers?
>
> Plus, what about science? There is science which only loves
operationally defined questions and answers?
I would say enlightenment
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > You should probably read the essay:
> >
> > http://organizations.utep.edu/Portals/1475/nagel_bat.pdf
> >
> > Knowing what it is like to be your identical
answers?
Plus, what about science? There is science which only loves operationally
defined questions and answers?
From: Xenophaneros Anartaxius
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:36 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> You should probably read the essay:
>
> http://organizations.utep.edu/Portals/1475/nagel_bat.pdf
>
> Knowing what it is like to be your identical twin brother
> is no more possible than knowing what it is like to be a
> bat. You can i
You should probably read the essay:
http://organizations.utep.edu/Portals/1475/nagel_bat.pdf
Knowing what it is like to be your identical twin brother
is no more possible than knowing what it is like to be a
bat. You can imagine to a certain extent what it would be
like for *you* to be a bat or t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> (snip)
> > Well, sorta. The focus isn't so much on what consciousness
> > is in an experiential sense, but rather on how it got there.
> > (Nagel covered the experiential
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > > wrote:
> >
> > --snip--
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>>
> I don't like the insto-get-out clause that magic gives you. Sorry.
It's a pet peeve.
>
>
It's a pet peeve of mine also. The only fantasy that appeals is the dark
stuff - like Lovecraft's nightmares. There are no get-out-of-jail-free
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
(snip)
> Well, sorta. The focus isn't so much on what consciousness
> is in an experiential sense, but rather on how it got there.
> (Nagel covered the experiential
Ooops, never finished the sentence. I meant to refer to his
seminal essay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > wrote:
>
> --snip--
>
> While I do not have time to enter the fray here at the moment,
> I did noti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
--snip--
While I do not have time to enter the fray here at the moment, I did notice
this thread about 'Mind and Cosmos' which I have *not* read but which seemingly
brings up
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > wrote:
> > >
(snip)
> > > > > I'm much more interested in whether the materialists are
> > > > > content tha
.com
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 6:13 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
A lot of people from the Judeo-christian-Islamic background
are like that. They simply cannot imagine going anywhere
else in the universe, because their views are mostly
anthropomorphi
James Tiptree Jr. and Pat Murphy?
That's a good idea, wonder if I'd be able to tell by reading them?
> PS I like some SF and have a good friend who REALLY likes it.
Wow, introduce me!
> From: salyavin808
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fai
6:13 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
snip
Frankenstein is a great book by any standard but it's
the basis of most SF because it's about man's scientific
creations running out of control.
This fear that we are unleashing something we ca
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> (snip)
> > Oh yes, when I meet a woman into sci-fi I always say Wow!
> > Most just hate it no matter how much I try and extol
> > it's virtues.
>
> FWIW, I love SF. Especi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> > >
> > > I hope that's not an argument from authority, probably
> > > the least convincing way of winning a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
Obbajee, I am determined to stay under 200! (-:
From: obbajeeba
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 9:10 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Chopra nothing without Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyav
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> > >
> > > It's interesting why there are so few female philosophers,
> > > same reason there a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> >
> > I hope that's not an argument from authority, probably
> > the least convincing way of winning an argument. All
> > of the ID crowd were "highly respected" PHDs, just n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
(snip)
> Oh yes, when I meet a woman into sci-fi I always say Wow!
> Most just hate it no matter how much I try and extol
> it's virtues.
FWIW, I love SF. Especially "hard" SF. Like you, I'm
bored to tears by fantasy. On the other hand, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> >
> > I hope that's not an argument from authority, probably
> > the least convincing way of winning an argument. All
> > of the ID crowd were "highly respected" PHDs, just n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fairfie
> >
> > --- "salyavin808" wrote:
> > >
> > > It's interesting why there are so few female philosophers,
> > > same reason there are so few top women chess players perhaps.
> > > A simplistic view would be the old Mars/Venus thing. But I
> > > think it's less a "women are more touchy-feely" th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's interesting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > It's interesting why there are so few female philosophers,
> > > same reason there are so fe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> >
> > It's interesting why there are so few female philosophers,
> > same reason there are so few top women chess players perhaps.
> > A simplistic view would be the old Ma
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
> It's interesting why there are so few female philosophers,
> same reason there are so few top women chess players perhaps.
> A simplistic view would be the old Mars/Venus thing. But I
> think it's less a "women are more touchy-feely
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
> >
> > I hope that's not an argument from authority, probably
> > the least convincing way of winning an argument. All
> > of the ID crowd were "highly respected" PHDs, just n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" wrote:
>
> I hope that's not an argument from authority, probably
> the least convincing way of winning an argument. All
> of the ID crowd were "highly respected" PHDs, just not
> any more, chortle.
Isn't it fascinating that to some people who c
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
