--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2006, at 3:22 AM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > Of course, is Buddhism what the Buddha taught?
>
> Which Buddha?
>
whichever.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern da
anonff write to Peter:
The experiece was very confusing to have and moreso to describe. If I
were the one doing the witnessing, I would experience myself as
separate from Being. This was not that. I would be, say, standing and
talking to someone, see them, see their mouth moving, hear the words
On Jan 16, 2006, at 3:22 AM, sparaig wrote:Of course, is Buddhism what the Buddha taught? Which Buddha?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrfishey2001"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > "Any idiot who had only read
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrfishey2001"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> "...Just as you assumed that it was Ok to trash a book
> you've never read because of its pop-culture title.
> Elitists te
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"...Just as you assumed that it was Ok to trash a book
you've never read because of its pop-culture title.
Elitists tend to think alike."
My heavens we have struck a nerve. How youÕve divined from the pixels
before
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrfishey2001"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Any idiot who had only read "Buddhism For Dummies"
> (and yes, there is such a book, and strangely enough
> it's actual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Any idiot who had only read "Buddhism For Dummies"
(and yes, there is such a book, and strangely enough
it's actually pretty good) could come up with a dozen
things in Bevan's talk that indicate he has neve
TurquoiseB wrote:
> But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
> I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
> descried as "there is no me-vs-them, we are all one."
>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sri Bevan Morris to be Mahesh's successor
Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transc
TurquoiseB wrote:
> The thing I'm still working on is how to improve
> my compassion when dealing with skunks.
>
Heh.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- So, you have that "experience" of witnessing. Good, and may I
> ask, has this led to a total eradication of suffering in the world?
It has allowed me to see Reality, that everything is in balance. Do
bad things st
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Do you treat people as well as you are able to
> > treat them, Barry?
>
> I think he does. He just apparently is severely challen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- So, you have that "experience" of wi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- So, you have that "experience" of witness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- So, you have that "experience" of witnessing. Good,
> > and may I ask, has this led to a total eradication of
> > suffering in t
Sounds like the perfect duality of CC. There is
Self/nothingness/consciousness and then everything
else which has this "flat" or false quality to it. As
if it isn't real at all. I used to call it the
cardboard world. No substance to it. It all hung like
a tiny basket within That.
--- anonyff <[EMA
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- So, you have that "experience" of witnessing. Good,
> and may I ask, has this led to a total eradication of
> suffering in the world?
Is total eradication of suffering in the world the
only worthy goal to have w
--- So, you have that "experience" of witnessing. Good, and may I
ask, has this led to a total eradication of suffering in the world?
If not, why not? Your experience, if that word can be used (since
it's happening to a relative body) leaves one in the dark as to "so
what?"...what are the cons
Peter
The experiece was very confusing to have and moreso to describe. If I
were the one doing the witnessing, I would experience myself as
separate from Being. This was not that. I would be, say, standing and
talking to someone, see them, see their mouth moving, hear the words
but they seemed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- anonyff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have/had an experience for a few months and on and
> > off since, that
> > left me baffled and I spoke directly to Maharishi
> > about it on a coufse
> > back in 1980. My
--- anonyff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have/had an experience for a few months and on and
> off since, that
> left me baffled and I spoke directly to Maharishi
> about it on a coufse
> back in 1980. My experience was one in which while I
> was standing
> there talking to someone I experience
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Is Awakening something to be "believ
I have/had an experience for a few months and on and off since, that
left me baffled and I spoke directly to Maharishi about it on a coufse
back in 1980. My experience was one in which while I was standing
there talking to someone I experienced that they were separate from
Being. The way I describe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Of course one needs to be aware of the true definition of Assume.
> > As I remember the statement goes, When
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Spare egg writes:
> Of course, Barry has never denied his intent to laugh AT people.
> Rather he has embraced and defended it. Seems a not very difficult
> job of mind-reading to assume somet
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Is Awakening something to be "believed in"? Does what
> > you believe in have anything to do with becoming
> > enlightened?
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Is Awakening something to be "believed in"? Does what
> > you believe in have anything to do with becoming
> > enlightened?
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is Awakening something to be "believed in"? Does what
> you believe in have anything to do with becoming
> enlightened?
Yes, you must absolutely believe in the fact that you can and will
gain enlightenment, no matt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Never a dull moment in Mah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Never a dull moment in MahaR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> > mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
> >
> A couple of questio
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
>
A couple of question for you:
1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of the
above?
2. what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> > So, the same with akashanon.
>
> He actually prefers "Akashic Moose".
>
for dessert?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Jo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > But as it turns out I have neither had, nor hav
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > But as it turns out I have neither had, nor h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The first is that I am
> > > *immensely* grat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
> > I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
> > descried as "there is n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> > mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
>
> "Mahafuckyas. Now THAT
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
> I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
> descried as "there is no me-vs-them, we are all one."
>
> I suspect that this description has almost nothing t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > The first is that I am
> > *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
> > experiences of enlightenment
>
> But apparen
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroup
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
> > him? Or just not walking your talk?
>
> What makes you think that one person's experiences,
> even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The first is that I am
> > *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
> > experiences of enlightenment
>
> But appare
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first is that I am
> *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
> experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the "There is no me-versus-them,
we-are-all one"-experience...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
> who have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't k
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
"Mahafuckyas. Now THAT cracked me right up!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:So, the same with akashanon. He actually prefers "Akashic Moose".
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jim Flanegin:
> So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
> Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
> helps him or not, though...
>
> Tom
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> The cool thing about akashanon's constant parrying and challenging
> is that it strengthens the Awakening experience of those who are
> challenged.
>
> Its like this dude I encountered in the post office the ot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
> > him? Or just not walking your talk?
>
> What makes you think that one person's experiences,
> even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
>
> TorquiseB writes:
> Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
> for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
>
Jim Flanegin:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
helps him or not, though...
Tom T:
Darn Jim you weren't supposed to tell him. He is such a perfect mirror
of how it used to be that is not hard to r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So, the same with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
> > have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I
> Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
> him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do with anyone else's? I make no such assumption.
Tom has had his own experiences, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yaho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > So, the same with akashanon. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
who have
> > Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
> > have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I d
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
> >
> > TorquiseB writes:
> > Du
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
> have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
> it helps him or not, though...
I suspect it has the opposite effect, bu
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
>
> TorquiseB writes:
> Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
> for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > > > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
> > > > intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
> > > > thinking, "It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
> > > > in case, I w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
> > > > intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
> > > > thinking, "It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
> > > > in case, I wi
> > > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
> > > intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
> > > thinking, "It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
> > > in case, I will be careful not to use ambiguous language,
> > > in case, I will be careful not or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
>
> TorquiseB writes:
> Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
> for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
> > virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
> > one is laughing *
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
> > may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > Laughing at someone is always an attack,
> > virtually by definition. As I've noted
> > several times, however, that doesn't mean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Laughing at someone is always an attack,
> virtually by definition. As I've noted
> several times, however, that doesn't mean
> that the person laughed at *feels* attacked.
> You're conflating the perspective of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
> > virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
> > one is laughing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that Barry has indicated that he believes that laughing
> AT is good for the person being laughed at, or something along
> those lines. He's even implied that he WAS attacking, but won't
> quite own up to it e
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
substance" was "Let's all talk about what *I* want
to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
to talk ab
Spare egg writes:
Of course, Barry has never denied his intent to laugh AT people.
Rather he has embraced and defended it. Seems a not very difficult
job of mind-reading to assume something, comment on that assumption,
and get CONFIRMATION of that assumption and therefore to continue to
assume
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But, why bother with what often/usually is perceived as an
> > attack, and then criticize for saying "that's an attack?"
>
> I don'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
> virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
> one is laughing *at* somebody is therefore equivalent
> to stating one's intention, so no minds need to be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
> may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, "It sounds
> like he MAY be mad at something. Just in case, I will be careful not
> to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Judy writes:
> Sure. But it would be more accurate to say (of the
> ant and Barry), "That isn't the kind of attack that
> can do you any damage." What makes it an attack is
> the intention of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I assume most view laughing with someone as a good thing.
>
> I think satire is an attempt to get everyone laughing. The target
may
> see themselves in the satire, but can take refuge and think "well at
> least
Alright already I humbly suggest folks, it's time to move on. Maybe go to
law school.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Judy writes
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Judy writes:
> Sure. But it would be more accurate to say (of the
> ant and Barry), "That isn't the kind of attack that
> can do you any damage." What makes it an attack is
> the intention of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Judy writes:
> Sure. But it would be more accurate to say (of the
> ant and Barry), "That isn't the kind of attack that
> can do you any damage." What makes it an attack is
> the intention of t
Judy writes:
Sure. But it would be more accurate to say (of the
ant and Barry), "That isn't the kind of attack that
can do you any damage." What makes it an attack is
the intention of the attacker, not the effect on the
attackee.
Tom T:
The thought stopper for me in this was who and how is the i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > And then there is the one-on-o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > And then there is the one-on-one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > And then there is the one-on-one put
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > And then there is the one-on-one put down. Not the most refined
> > behavior. But for it to be an attack, to draw blood, the in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And then there is the one-on-one put down. Not the most refined
> behavior. But for it to be an attack, to draw blood, the insultee
> has to play victim and accept it as an insult.
"For it to be an attack" and "for
96 matches
Mail list logo
