--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> (Maharishi on Madhuchandas)
Actually that's probably "madhucchandaH" (lemma ["dictionary
form"]: madhucchandas), but due to sandhi "madhucchandaa RSiH".
16 madhucchandas m. name of the 51st of Vishvaa-mitra's 101
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 2/3/06 5:49 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Even then (mid-70s), they had convinced themselves
> > that they were so "in tune" with "Natural Law" that
> > they had the right to violate actual la
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > on 2/3/06 5:49 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Even then (mid-70s), they had convinced themselves
> > > that they were so "in tune" w
Dear Fairfield Lifers,
In the continuing saga of the erosion of our privacy rights, here's
some more interesting news about the use of internet data (e-mails,
discussion group posts, search engine results) and the legal system
(civil and criminal prosecution), including the ability to trace anony-
You mean that this latest fundamentalist, intolerant, war-mongering,
reactionary, intolerant protest put you in mind of a man renowned for
trying to bring about world peace in our time? Now that is ironic!
Perhaps MMY is a closet sympathiser with these people?
> With pampleths, saying: "Kill th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You mean that this latest fundamentalist, intolerant, war-mongering,
> reactionary, intolerant protest put you in mind of a man renowned
for
> trying to bring about world peace in our time? Now that is i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > > on 2/3/06 5:49 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Even then (mid
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> on 2/3/06 5:49 PM, TurquoiseB at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Even then (mid-70s), they had convinced themselves
> > that they were so "in tune" with "Natural Law"
> that
> > they had the right to violate actual law.
>
> I often got the feelin
Michael, have you been to a group program yet? I'm
thinking of going next sunday.
-Peter
--- Michael Dean Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since this list occasionally has discussed TM
> activities and teach-
> ers and controversies in South Florida (Miami-Dade,
> Broward, Palm
> Beach Counti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
>
> > > wrote:
> > > > on 2/3/06 5:49
on 2/4/06 4:11 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I often got the feeling from Maharishi, and recent speeches
>>> seem to reflect this, that he didn't have much respect for
>>> the level of intelligence that formulated man-made laws.
>>> He considered man-made laws legitimate and worth
I'd like to see any of these rationalizations hold up in court!
Sal
On Feb 4, 2006, at 9:32 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
ONLY if you buy the definition of enlightenment that
Maharishi peddles. That's my point. His definition
is that the enlightened can do no wrong. Therefore,
if you assume that
I recall a story Lucy Lediaev to our science of creative
intelligence class of Maharishi rushing to catch a plane.
Because he was late he told his driver to run the red
lights on the way to the airport. His entourage trailed
further and further behind him because they couldn't
just plow throug
on 2/4/06 9:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> ONLY if you buy the definition of enlightenment that
> Maharishi peddles. That's my point. His definition
> is that the enlightened can do no wrong.
There have been people in FF who have claimed to be enlightened or
intuitively gifte
on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The latter sounds like Megalonmania 101. If you're
> a megalomaniac, you find a way to make *everything*
> about you. That's what he was doing; he wasn't really
> owning up to making any mistakes.
Like the ice stalagmite that formed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'd like to see any of these rationalizations hold up in court!
I guess you must have missed Lawson's post saying:
"A perfectly valid attitude for someone enlightened, though you have
to face the consquences regard
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The latter sounds like Megalomania 101. If you're
> > a megalomaniac, you find a way to make *everything*
> > about you. That's what he was doing; he
on 2/4/06 10:05 AM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Speaking of laws of nature, most of us have probably
> experienced how, once we learn the rules of something,
> we gain the ability to break them and get a way with it.
> In fact, most creative breakthroughs result from the
> intel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
wrote:
> > > > --- In FairfieldLi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 9:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > ONLY if you buy the definition of enlightenment that
> > Maharishi peddles. That's my point. His definition
> > is that the enlightened can do no wr
http://www.suryakumari.com/articles/hsanti.html
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disci
To imagine that the belief that the enlightened can do no 'wrong' is
roughly the same as believing in the 'blue-blood' of royals, and their
intimate connection with God. But, I reckon most people have
experienced 'enlightenment' temporarilly, if only for a few minutes.
Probably MMY has experien
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > on 2/3/06 5:49 PM, TurquoiseB at
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Even then (mid-70s), they had convinced themselves
> > > that they were so "in tune" with
Title: Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari
From: Mike Scozzari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
To: Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
Hi Rick
Could you please post this on Fairfield Life for me.
Thanks,
Mike Scozzari
Mike Scozzari
TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > > on 2/3/06 5:49 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Even then (mid
Possibly, to imagine that the enlightened can do no 'wrong' is roughly
the same as believing in the 'blue-blood' of royals and their
intimate connection with God. But, I reckon most people have
experienced 'enlightenment', if only for a few minutes. Probably MMY
has experienced enlightenment too,
Possibly to imagine that the belief that the enlightened can do
no 'wrong' is roughly similar to believing in the 'blue-blood' of
royals, and their intimate connection with God. But, I reckon most
people have experienced 'enlightenment' temporarilly, if only for a few
minutes. Probably MMY has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > The latter sounds like Megalomania 101. If you're
> > > a megalomaniac, you find
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Possibly, to imagine that the enlightened can do no 'wrong'
> is roughly the same as believing in the 'blue-blood' of
> royals and their intimate connection with God.
Or in Papal infallibility. Yet mil
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig"
wrote:
> > > > --- In FairfieldLi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But, within the description of enlightenment that MMYpresents, how
> could an enlightened person behave differently than following
> his/her
> inner intuition? Perhaps that inner intuition says to follow the law
> wi
Isn't it just certain individuals trying to take advantage of others'
suggestibility. Ironically, it is often the more spiritual who become
enveloped in this belief of another's infallibility.
I've said it before, I do wonder if some of those who have elected to
follow MMY are not more spiritual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Isn't it just certain individuals trying to take advantage of
> others' suggestibility.
That's certainly been a theme throughout the entire
history of spiritual development.
> Ironically, it is often th
on 2/4/06 11:43 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Bingo. You have just nailed the fatal flaw in
> Maharishi's model. To believe it is true, you
> have to believe that before enlightenment, one
> has free will, and that afterwards one does not.
>
> What *changed* in the operating sy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > But, within the description of enlightenment that MMYpresents,
how
> > could an enlightened person behave differently than following
> > his/her
> > in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> wrote:
> > > > In Maharishi's c
To recapitulate, from my observation, it is often the more spiritually
inclined who get involved in the teachings of the church or in the
thinking of a particular 'spiritual' teacher. Having gotten involved,
they soon find there are certain beliefs about infallability to deal
with, and I think
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 2/4/06 11:43 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Bingo. You have just nailed the fatal flaw in
> > Maharishi's model. To believe it is true, you
> > have to believe that before enlightenment, one
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To recapitulate, from my observation, it is often the more
spiritually
> inclined who get involved in the teachings of the church or in the
> thinking of a particular 'spiritual' teacher. Having gotten
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > I agree. The enlightened man driving his car makes the
> > decisions necessary to navigate successfully through
> > traffic and arrive at his destinat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > on 2/4/06 11:43 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Bingo. You have just nailed the fatal flaw in
> > > Maharishi's model. To believ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
> wrote:
> >
> > Possibly, to imagine that the enlightened can do no 'wrong'
> > is roughly the same as believing in the 'blue-blood' of
> > royals and th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree with you. To raise critical questions is a good thing - even
> when it comes to Guru Dev - who is my absolute favorite. I love his
> quotations. He was very strict - but he was true to his principles.
> He c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The latter sounds like Megalonmania 101. If you're
> > a megalomaniac, you find a way to make *everything*
> > about you. That's what he was doing;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Mike Scozzari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
> To: Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
>
> Hi Rick
>
> Could you please post this on Fairfield Life
on 2/4/06 1:27 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>
>> I agree with you. To raise critical questions is a good thing - even
>> when it comes to Guru Dev - who is my absolute favorite. I love his
>> quotatio
I just have to say that "wrongaroonie" is one of the best comebacks
I've heard in a long time. I'll be using it from now on.
Thanks.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In Fairfield
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 1:27 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> I agree with you. To raise critical questions is a good thing - even
> >> whe
Comment below:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
**SNIP**
> Or, to put this in the framework of some people's enlightenment type
experiences, sure
> you chop wood and carry water both before and after the Big E. The
only difference is that
> after the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just have to say that "wrongaroonie" is one of the best comebacks
> I've heard in a long time. I'll be using it from now on.
>
> Thanks.
I am happy for the both of you. It is comforting to
have in our midst p
In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike
Scozzari TM Center Deerfield Beach, Florida www.bay3.com/tm
As many have heard, I have been asked to cease and desist teaching
TM by the TMO attorneys in Iowa. Their demands include that I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just have to say that "wrongaroonie" is one of the best comebacks
> I've heard in a long time. I'll be using it from now on.
>
> Thanks.
What confused you about it?
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
wrote:
> >
> > From: Mike Scozzari
> > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
> > To: Rick Archer
> > Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
Do you know who the recertifie
In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike,
remember you are not alone in this fight. You're the point man but only
in front at this time. There will be many ex-TM teachers who will rally
around such action, including us. Many w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Mike Scozzari
> > > Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
> > > To: Rick Arc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The latter sounds like Megalonmania 101. If you're
> > a megalomaniac, you find a way to make *everything*
> > about you. That's what he was doing;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > The latter sounds like Megalomania 101. If you're
> > > a megalomaniac, you find
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > But, within the description of enlightenment that MMYpresents,
how
> > could an enlightened person behave differently than following
> > his/her
> > in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 11:43 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Bingo. You have just nailed the fatal flaw in
> > Maharishi's model. To believe it is true, you
> > have to believe that before enlightenment, one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > on 2/4/06 11:43 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Bingo. You have just nailed the fatal flaw in
> > > Maharishi's model. To belie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
> > > > --- In Fa
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Lawsuit - TMO vs. Scozzari
on 2/4/06 1:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike, remember you are not alone in this fight. You're the point man but only in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To recapitulate, from my observation, it is often the more
spiritually
> inclined who get involved in the teachings of the church or in the
> thinking of a particular 'spiritual' teacher. Having gotten
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> >
> > on 2/4/06 10:32 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > The latter sounds like Megalonmania 101. If you're
> > > a megalomaniac,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To recapitulate, from my observation, it is often the more
spiritually
> inclined who get involved in the teachings of the church or in the
> thinking of a particular 'spiritual' teacher. Having gotten
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Mike, remember you are not alone in this fight. You're the point
man but
> only in front at this time. There will be many ex
on 2/4/06 2:17 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I agree. The enlightened man driving his car makes the decisions
> necessary
>> to navigate successfully through traffic and arrive at his
> destination. Why
>> shouldn't other decisions be just as volitional and just as subject
> to dir
I replied to this message earlier but somehow the message appears to
have become lost.
When Guru Dev became Shankaracharya he relaxed his habit of keeping
his distance of women. In fact, if you look at the filmstock of him
giving satsang it is clear there are many women present.
I have the deta
I'm confused by your question (below). I merely made a statement that
I enjoyed the term "wrongaroonie" and looked forward to the time I
might be able to employ it myself.
Also I find it puzzling that Turquoise B. thought that the same
compliment was somehow a statement re my absolute knowledge o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm confused by your question (below). I merely made a statement
> that I enjoyed the term "wrongaroonie" and looked forward to the
> time I might be able to employ it myself.
>
> Also I find it puzzling that T
In a message dated 2/4/06 2:33:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not
do the same with McDonald's Hamburgers then?
I think it is done to some degree or another. One corner has
Mickey d's and down the street you'll have Jack in the Box or some other
franchise
>
> In March 2005 the TMO announced a "re-certification
> requirement" for all
> teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in
> job skills and it was all
> about money. Of the 40K teachers in the US, only
> 340 took the course. The
> TMO is guilty of not providing any job secur
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> on 2/4/06 1:27 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ingegerd"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> I agree with you. To raise critical questions is
> a good thing - even
> >> when it com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm confused by your question (below). I merely made a statement
> that I enjoyed the term "wrongaroonie" and looked forward to the
> time I might be able to employ it myself.
Oh, OK, I thought you were being sa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused by your question (below). I merely made a statement
> > that I enjoyed the term "wrongaroonie" and looked forward to the
> > time I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > on 2/4/06 1:27 PM, wayback71 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Is it true that women were not allowed near Guru
> > Dev?
> >
> > That's what I heard. There's a story that he sai
http://www.suryakumari.com/articles/hsanti.html
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > on 2/3/06 5:49 PM, TurquoiseB at
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > Even then (mid-70s), they had convinced themselves
> > > that they were so "in tune" with
Hey if they want to pay me $2000/month to bow down to a Raja, I'll do it. For $4000/month I'll do it twice.
Sal
On Feb 4, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
-- You were instructed by Maharishi, 30 years or so ago, to teach TM once you fulfilled the requirements of your TTC etc. The TMO's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Mike Scozzari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:37:41 -0800
> To: Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Lawsuit - TMO vs Scozzari
>
> Hi Rick
>
> Could you please post this on Fairfield Life
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Possibly, to imagine that the enlightened can do no 'wrong' is
roughly
> the same as believing in the 'blue-blood' of royals and their
> intimate connection with God. But, I reckon most people have
> expe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 4:11 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>> I often got the feeling from Maharishi, and recent speeches
> >>> seem to reflect this, that he didn't have much respect for
> >>> the level of intell
Okay, thanks. Yes, I thought it cute.
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused by your question (below). I merely made a statement
> > that I enjoyed the term "wrongaro
Great, thanks, I'll be more careful to stay out of the crossfire in
the future.
Marek
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis"
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused by your question (below). I merely made
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 1:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 2/4/06 11:22:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> Mike, remember you are not alone in this figh
'Vedic literature' is full of ghastly wars, vile punishments for
minor crimes, talking animals and wizardry too.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
> wrote:
> >
> > Possibly, to imagine that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 2:17 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree. The enlightened man driving his car makes the decisions
> > necessary
> >> to navigate successfully through traffic and arrive at his
> > dest
The reason I think the conversation about the enlightened and their
ability to supposedly not make mistakes is silly is because the
information regarding their purported ability to only act in a
spontaneous right way because they are now "beyond the influence of
right and wrong" comes from people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 2/4/06 2:17 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree. The enlightened man driving his car makes the decisions
> > necessary
> >> to navigate successfully through traffic and arrive at his
> > dest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 2/4/06 2:33:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Why not do the same with McDonald's Hamburgers then?
>
>
>
>
> I think it is done to some degree or another. One corner has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> >
> > In March 2005 the TMO announced a "re-certification
> > requirement" for all
> > teachers. Teachers report there was no refresher in
> > job skills and it was all
> > about money. Of the 40K teachers i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 'Vedic literature' is full of ghastly wars, vile punishments for
> minor crimes, talking animals and wizardry too.
So is every other religious/cultural literary work from that periodof
human history, as
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:40:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except
the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the
law.
I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I
think the TMO owns the name Transcendental Mediation Program, but not
Trans
In a message dated 2/4/06 5:47:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but Jack
in the Box doesn't have "Original Jack with the Jack-in-the-Box speaker"
and "new improved, but over-priced Jack with extra options but no speaker"
because there is a company that owns t
---right on!)...below, the persons in question may not be
Enlightened. But assuming they are, can they make mistakes.
Unfortunately, this can (perhaps never) be proven nor disproven,
since once an event has occured, there's no way to prove that an
alternative event might have been more dharmi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 'Vedic literature' is full of ghastly wars, vile punishments for
> minor crimes, talking animals and wizardry too.
>
**
You wrote a book about a great saint, so you think you have standing
In a message dated 2/4/06 6:05:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except
the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the
law.
I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong, but I
think the TMO owns the name Transcendental Mediation Program,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 2/4/06 6:05:29 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> Except the TMO owns the name and possession is 9/10's of the law.
>
>
>
> I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong,
on 2/4/06 6:05 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 'Vedic literature' is full of ghastly wars, vile punishments for
>> minor crimes, talking animals and wizardry too.
>>
>
> **
>
But after becoming Shankaracharya he relaxed that standpoint about
not allowing women around. You only have to look at the filmstock of
him speaking live, to see there were loads of women attending his
lecture.
I have the contact details of an elderly lady who claims to be his
first woman disc
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
