between members of ITHEA® ISS. (pls. see www.ithea.org ). Let finish this
introductory part with little information about me. My name is Krassimir
Markov. I am mathematician with specialization in computer science and I
have worked in the Institute of Mathematics and Informatics at the
Bulgarian
Dear Karl, dear colleagues,
Thank you for kind words.
FIS Bibliography page in our internal FIS page and no one else has access to it.
It is aimed to serve our discussion only.
This means that the papers are included by the authors request without
censuring and additional control.
My wish is
Dear Pedro, Qiao Tian-qing, Karl and all FIS colleagues.
Please receive my best wishes for the New Year. Let it be fruitful and
successful !
Sorry, for a long time I have no possibilities to work in internet. I had many
travels and after returning in Sofia more than a month I had no internet and
Dear Loet, Pedro and FIS Colleagues,
It is very important to take in account the ontological structure of the
information subjects in the reality.
The hierarchy of the intellectual properties is not investigated in deep
till now.
Who may say that the human brain is one whole but not a very
Dear Pedro and FIS colleagues,
I agree with the proposition that at this moment “the most universal form of
information is unattainable”.
What we have to do, I think, is to classify the existing theories, to explain
theirs main features and to publish the survey for further work.
This work is
Dear Colleagues,
Selecting process of the papers for GIT 2011 is done and main papers are in
print in International Journal Information Theories and Applications,
Vol.18, Numbers 1 and 2.
Only for FIS the PDF variant if these numbers are available at:
http://www.ithea.org/fis/
Welcome in
Dear Guy, Mark and FIS colleagues,
This misunderstanding may be solved with simple step - if we will accept
definition of information as a kind of reflection, which is internal
structure in the thing but not the whole thing .
Friendly regards
Krassimir
-Original Message-
From: Guy A
and in the Thematic Collection “ Applicable Information Models”
Book No.: 22 from ITHEA International Scientific Book Series:
http://www.foibg.com/ibs_isc/ibs-22/ibs-22.htm
Respectfully yours
Krassimir Markov
ITHEA President
___
fis mailing list
fis
-Original Message-
From: boris.sunik
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:10 AM
To: ithea-...@ithea.org
Subject: General Information Theory
Dear Colleague,
For your information:
http://www.GeneralInformationTheory.com
Regards,
Boris Sunik
-Original Message-
From: boris.sunik
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:26 PM
To: 'Krassimir Markov'
Subject: RE: [Fis] Fw: The General Information Theory of Sunik
Dear Krassimir,
Below are my points regarding discussed issues.
Regards,
Boris Sunik
1. I never claimed that computer
-Original Message-
From: boris.sunik
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 10:26 PM
To: 'Krassimir Markov'
Subject: RE: [Fis] Fw: The General Information Theory of Sunik
Dear Krassimir,
Below are my points regarding discussed issues.
Regards,
Boris Sunik
1. I never claimed that computer
(Slovenia)
Jacobus Koolen (South Korea)
Svetlozar Rachev (USA)
Egon Schulte (USA)
Sergey Shpectorov (UK)
Kokichi Sugihara (Japan)
Koen Vanhoof (Belgium)
Cedric Villani (France) (Fields Medal 2010)
Michel Deza (France) (michel.d...@ens.fr)
Krassimir Markov (Bulgaria) (mar...@foibg.com): contact for local
Dear Marcin, Gordana, and FIS colleagues,
It is impossible for me not to answer of such very important and, I think,
on time proposal.
What we have to do?
Of course, to establish common paradigm !?!
The great problem here is that every author stay on his own position and do
not accept the
Dear Marcin,
You are quite right: Your Theory is absolutely correct !
As well as the Theory of Mark, of course as main, and as all others, at the
first place - the Theory of Shannon !
Every theory represents any specific point of view and from its point of
view it is correct.
What we have to
this.
Friendly regards
Krassimir
From: Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 8:38 PM
To: Joseph Brenner
Cc: m...@aiu.ac.jp ; Krassimir Markov
Subject: RE: [Fis] Discussion of Information Science Education
Dear Joseph,
Now I have no right to post to the list, but I anyway want
Dear Gordana, Pedro ans FIS colleagues,
Now I am too busy with the summer conferences and have no time to explain in
deep what I think about Terry’s book.
Shortly I can say that many already clear phenomena in the book are presented
as “just invented or to be invented”.
At the first place the
Dear FIS Colleagues,
It is really pleasure to read your posts in this exciting mail list.
During the time I am subscribed in (Thanks to Pedro for inviting me!) I have
read interesting and very useful ideas.
Now I think is the right time to put one very important question:
What is the main
From: Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 4:06 PM
To: karl.javors...@gmail.com
Cc: Pedro C. Marijuan ; Krassimir Markov ; Joseph Brenner ; Loet Leydesdorff ;
bob logan ; fis
Subject: RE: FIS Information and the Eye of the Beholder
My interpretation of Krassimir’s words
Dear Zong-Rong,
I am very interested to receive your files.
Please send them to :
mar...@foibg.com
Let me remember that ITHEA ISS support a web page
http://ithea.org/fis/
at which we may publish files to be downloaded from all FIS-ers.
If you agree, I will add your files at this web page.
Dear Raquel and FIS Colleagues,
Nice to see such activity on the FIS-land.
May I ask for more “simple English” in the explanations.
Main part of texts, I had received from FIS-list till now, are at the “very
high scientific level” for which understanding one has to look for special
knowledge.
and to use
common language!
Best regards
Krassimir
From: Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:33 PM
To: Krassimir Markov
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS new course
Well, I agree Krassimir, but if we follow that simplification pattern we are
lowering the education level our fellow
Dear Raquel, Loet and FIS Colleagues,
Yes, “global brain” is mystification.
One may find similarity between organization of society and human brain.
But this is the same kind of similarity as to mechanism, computer, clock, etc. .
Such similarities may be used to generate some new ideas or to
Dear FIS colleagues,
Sorry to double a part of this text for some of you but the SPAM filter of
FIS server stopped my first letter.
It is good for me because now I have second “first” attempt for this week
in FIS mailing list.
About words and numbers:
Numbers are invented to make possible the
Dear Pedro, Joseph, John, Sri, and FIS Colleagues,
At first place, I want to congratulate all of you with 20-th Anniversary of FIS!
This is remarkable achievement of FIS community!
I wish you health and good positive spirit to continue our very important,
interesting and fruitful collaboration!
Dear Pridi,
An accordance with my understanding:
In physical world there exist only reflections but not information.
Information “i is the quadruple:
i = (s, r, e, I)
where
s is a source entity, which is reflected in r
r is the entity in which reflection of s exists
e is an evidence for the
it
reflects, at least corresponded definition.
I.e. one needs to configure the quadruple to receive any information.
Friendly regards
Krassimir
From: Jerry LR Chandler
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:34 PM
To: FIS Information Science
Cc: Krassimir Markov
Subject: Re: [Fis] Re to Pridi
To: FIS
Cc: Krassimir Markov ; Pridi Siregar
Subject: Re: [Fis] Re to Pridi: infinite bandwith and finite informationcontent
CS Peirce and Chemical Nomenclature
Pridi, Krassimir, List:
(In order to place this comment in context, and for reference, I have copied
Krassimir's definition
(e.g., between 'internal' and 'external') could be
part of the strategy.
Best wishes,
Joseph
- Original Message -
From: Krassimir Markov
To: Jerry LR Chandler ; FIS ; Pridi Siregar
Sent: Saturday, July 26
and applications”. As more theories so much systematized
knowledge.
Mark, thank you for brilliant remark!
As you see we continue and extend our common research started in 1989-1991.
Friendly regards
Krassimir
From: Burgin, Mark
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:33 PM
To: Krassimir Markov
Dear Pedro, Carolina and FIS Colleagues,
Firstly I want to congratulate Pedro and team for new FIS web site!
It looks nice and I am sure it will be useful tool for all of us.
Secondly – what is Neuroinformation?
From point of view of General Information Theory, it is needed a Subject for
Dear Bob,
I think, there is no conflict between two points of view – information may be a
process and it may be a static depending of what kind of reflection it is.
For instance, we reflect the world around:
- as static - by photos, art images, sculptures, etc.;
- as dynamic - by movies, theater
Dear Francesco, FIS,
It is no need to be mathematician to understand that composition of a function
f and f-1 gives identity.
In other words, if you use Google translator to translate from Italian to
English and after that received text you will translate back to Italian you may
control what
Dear Chuan, Pedro, and FIS colleagues,
We need more concrete point of view to provide discussion.
Maybe it will be good to take in account the paper:
Zhongzhi Shi. On Intelligence Science // International Journal of Advanced
Intelligence
Volume 1, Number 1, pp.39-57, November, 2009.
Dear Chuan, Pedro and FIS colleagues,
I agree with your arguments and conclusions.
Unfortunately, these weeks I was seriously ill and could not take active
part in the discussion.
But, fortunately, I had published a paper where my reasoning and conclusions
were explained.
Please see the paper
Dear John and Stan,
Your both hierarchies are good only if you believe in God.
But this is believe, not science.
Sorry, nothing personal!
Friendly regards
Krassimir
From: John Collier
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 5:02 PM
To: Stanley N Salthe ; fis
Subject: Re: [Fis] Philosophy, Computing, and
Dear Pedro and FIS Colleagues,
This discussion was not planed. It started without any a priory explanation and
because of this become more emotional.
I see, we have different “fen clubs” depending of sympathy to one or other
definition of information.
This is nice. Variety is important for
Dear Marcus and FIS Colleagues,
Thank you very much for your great effort to develop useful knowledge about
information phenomena.
For me, the FIS discussions are very interesting.
Unfortunately, I have no time to participate actively due to preparing ITHEA
Int. Conferences, and especially, the
ch the recipient can
recognize what the reflection reflects.
Kind regards
Крассимир
From: Francesco Rizzo
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 5:20 PM
To: Krassimir Markov
Subject: Re: [Fis] _ Re: _ Closing lecture
Caro Krassimir,
come ho scritto altre volte l'informazione ha un s
Dear Howard,
Thank you very much for your great effort and nice explanation!
I like it!
Only what I needed to see is a concrete answer to the question “what it the
Information?”
You absolutely clearly described it and I totally agree with your
considerations.
Only what is needed is to conclude
Dear Pedro and FIS Colleagues,
First of all, because this is first my post in this year, please receive my
best wishes for health and prosperity in the new 2016 year!
Let it be peaceful and constructive!
About quarks and all other entities I would to remember (in accordance with
Pedro) that
Dear John and FIS Colleagues,
The main paradox of the “black hole information paradox” is that maybe someone
knows what is the “black hole” but in the same time he/she has no imagination
what is “information”.
Friendly regards
Krassimir
From: John Collier
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016
.
Next half month I will spend on Summer Session of ITHEA International
Conferences (http://www.ithea.org/conferences/itaf2016.htm).
Because of this I shall be silent till middle of July.
Have nice and happy summer!
From: Francesco Rizzo
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:29 PM
To: Krassimir Markov
Dear Marcus and FIS Colleagues,
I am writing this letter on behalf of FIS Steering Committee .
During the past weeks we had an extraordinary situation in our mailing list
caused by some not so polite expressions.
As we have seen, Marcus was hurt by a disparaging remarks in the review of his
Dear FIS colleagues,
I think, it is needed to put discussion on mathematical foundation. Let me
remember that:
The Borsuk–Ulam theorem (BUT), states that every continuous function from an
n-sphere into Euclidean n-space maps some pair of antipodal points to the same
point.
Here, two
, as
suggested by, e.g., Fokker-Planck equations, it does not matter: you may always
find the antipodal points with matching description predicted by BUT.
Ciao!
--
Inviato da Libero Mail per Android
sabato, 26 novembre 2016, 06:23PM +01:00 da Krassimir Markov mar...@foibg.com:
Dear
Dear Arturo,
Your mobile is NOT able to transmit and utilize INFORMATION but some
signals!!!
As well as the artificial limb walk with its owner but it is not a living
mater.
Firstly, we have to understand what is information!
After that ...
Friendly regards
Krassimir
From:
Dear Pedro and FIS Colleagues,
First of all I wish you Happy and Very Successful New Year !
Let it will be peaceful and healthy for us and our families, for all our
friends all over the world !
Second - I am not specialist in physics - because of this I trust that in
CERN there exist such
ankey
Cc: Krassimir Markov ; Arturo Tozzi ; FIS Webinar
Subject: Re: [Fis] non-living objects COULD NOT “exchange information”
1) Let me second to the point Alex raises:
machines, computers, do exchange information. It would be against cultural
conventions to say that the notification that the ref
Dear Arturo and FIS Colleagues,
Let me remember that:
The basic misunderstanding that non-living objects could “exchange
information” leads to many principal theoretical as well as psychological
faults.
For instance, photon could exchange only energy and/or reflections !
Sorry for this n-th
Dear Pedro, Arturo, Michel, and FIS Colleagues,
First of all, friendly greetings to everybody for the new FIS Season!
It is nice to meet all of you again in the FIS List – alive and, I hope,
healthy as it is possible!
Energy and the Matter ARE ONE AND THE SAME!
Let remember the Great Albert's
”,
“Information Subject”, and “Information Interaction”.
Further we may discuss the details, but, I hope, we may try to accept
these categories as very beginning foundation.
Friendly greetings
Krassimir
Krassimir Markov
Director
ITHEA Institute
Dear FIS Colleagues,
We have two simple questions with simple answers.
The first was mine: What is “Agent”?
The second is from Jeremy Sherman:
"Can members remember a time when they experienced a fundamental shift in
their assumptions, methodology or questions through interactions on this
--
Krassimir Markov
Director
ITHEA Institute of Information Theories and Applications
Sofia, Bulgaria
presid...@ithea.org
www.ithea.org
Dear FISers,
A hot discussion indeed...
We can all agree that perspectives on information depend on the context.
Physics, mathematics, thermodynamics
I am not going
to go into that further here.
Regards,
John
PS, please note that my university email was inadvertently wiped out, so I
am currently using the above email, also the alias coll...@ncf.ca If
anyone has wondered why their mail to me has been returned, this is why.
On 2017/09/30 11:20 AM, Kr
Dear FIS Colleagues,
It is time for my second post this week.
Many thanks to Christophe Menant (for the profound question) and to all
colleagues (for the very nice and useful comments)!
**
Christophe Menant had written:
“However, I'm not sure that “meaning” is enough to
Dear Yixin, Sung, Terry, Mark, and FIS Colleagues,
I agree with your considerations!
Let me remark that the General Information Theory is much more than a
single concept. You have seen that I have some answers in advance due to
already developed theory.
What is important now is to finish this
: Alex Hankey
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:21 PM
To: Krassimir Markov
Cc: FIS Webinar
Subject: Re: [Fis] About 10 Principles
RE: P1. Information is information, neither matter nor energy.
M1. Information is a class of reflections in material entities. Not every
reflection is information
Dear FIS Colleagues,
It is time for my second post this week.
First of all I am glad to participate in such very interesting discussion!
Thank you for the nice posts.
More than 25 years ago, working on the new theory, I had to solve the
problem with concept of entity which has information
Krassimir Markov
page 122-125 in:
http://foibg.com/ibs_isc/ibs-31/IBS_ISC-No31-KDS2014.pdf
Friendly greetings
Krassimir
From: Francesco Rizzo
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2018 10:42 AM
To: Sungchul Ji
Cc: FIS FIS ; sji.confor...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Fis] Are there 3 kinds of motions in physics
Dear Colleagues,
During activity of Infos’ consciousness, reflections are combined and as a
result the new ones may be created and stored in the Infos memory.
Processing of some reflections may cause some activity, too.
In other words, it doesn't matter what kind of Infos is active –
Dear Mark and FIS Colleagues,
First of all. I support the idea of Mark to write a paper and to publish it in
IJ ITA.
It will be nice to continue our common work this way.
At the second place, I want to point that till now the discussion on
Is information physical?
was more-less chaotic – we
Dear Sung,
A simple question:
If always n>0 why we need log in
I = -log_2(m/n) = - log_2 (m) + log_2(n) (1)
Friendly greetings
Krassimir
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
Dear Sung,
You wrote:
> I think the main reason that we express 'information' as a logarithmic
function of the number of choices available, n, may be because the human
brain finds it easier to remember (and communicate and reason with) 10
than 100, or 100 than 10. . . . 0,
: Monday, April 30, 2018 3:21 AM
To: fis
Cc: Krassimir Markov
Subject: Re: [Fis] “The information is “Real” or “Mental” depending of point of
view!”.
List,
On Apr 28, 2018, at 6:22 AM, Krassimir Markov <mar...@foibg.com> wrote:
The question “Is information physical?” is very important a
Dear Karl and FIS colleagues,
Yes, the Number Theory is very important basis!
But, I think, there is no need to number every word.
Because ... All words are already numbered
We have published large monograph named
“Natural Language Addressing”
where we outlined this idea and presented the
Dear Pedro and FIS Colleagues,
I am glad to inform you that the paper which was created by a group of FIS
members is ready.
It is published with open access in the International Journal “Information
Theories and Applications”, Volume 24, Number 4, pages 303-321.
The title of the paper is “Data
Journal are OBLIGATED!
Friendly greetings
Krassimir
From: tozziart...@libero.it
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 10:58 PM
To: Krassimir Markov ; fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: Re: [Fis] The FIS paper "Data versus Information " is published
Dear, prominent Authors,
You write in
Friendly greetings
Krassimir
From: tozziart...@libero.it
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 12:42 PM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es ; Krassimir Markov
Subject: Re: [Fis] The polite and high scientific style of the posts to be
published in an International Journal are OBLIGATED!
Dear Krassimir,
Dear colleagues,
I understand that it is not so easy to answer to the simple question.
But the mental models are very important for understanding the information and
communication phenomena.
So, again the same simple question: What is the “mental model”?
Friendly greetings
Krassimir
, ISSN 1310-0513 (printed), ISSN 1313-0463 (online), pp.
4-38.
http://www.foibg.com/ijita/vol20/ijita20-01-p01.pdf
[5] Krassimir Markov, Christophe Menant, Stanley N Salthe, Yixin Zhong, Karl
Javorszky, Alex Hankey, Loet Leydesdorff, Guy A Hoelzer, Jose Javier Blanco
Rivero, Robert K. Logan
Dear Mark and Colleagues,
Very nice “simple question”: “Is information physical?”
I agree that “letters, electromagnetic waves and actually all physical objects
are only carriers of information”.
The brain is carrier of information, too.
Now, I think, what we need to clear is another
skop.org/File:Wittgenstein_Ludwig_Tractatus_Logico_Philosophicus_1922.pdf
)
From: Krassimir Markov
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 12:34 AM
...
Infos has possibility to reflect the reality via receptors and to operate with
received reflections in its memory. The opposite is possible - via effectors
I
reflection of information and
information processes.
Sincerely,
Mark
On 3/11/2018 3:34 PM, Krassimir Markov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
This letter contains more than one theme, so it is structured as follow:
- next step in “mental model” explanation;
- about “Knowledge market
Dear FIS Colleagues,
I agree with Joseph and Pedro that:
“There are no ideal meta-observers; we are all, to a certain extent, both
meta-observers of the discussion and participants in it. This is not a simple
vertical hierarchy. We move between these two roles, switching from actualizing
Dear Sung,
I like your approach but I think it is only a part of the whole.
1. The shadows are real but only a part of the whole. What is needed is a
systematic research from what they are part.
2. About the whole now I will use the category theory I have seen you like:
CATA => F => CATB => G
Yes, correct. The right concept is the “external observer” – answered Giordano!
From: Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 11:36 AM
To: Loet Leydesdorff
Cc: fis
Subject: Re: [Fis] Meta-observer?
I know him: his name is God, the meta-observer + meta-actor at the same time.
76 matches
Mail list logo
