On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 10:49 PM, syd adams wrote:
> Like we couldn't see this coming ;)
>
> As for the 777 , unrealistic according to who ? I'm not against
> changing it as one of the default aircraft , there are a lot of other
> great choices now , but I do get annoyed with these claims b
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:13 AM, ThorstenB wrote:
> On 20.02.2011 15:40, Curtis Olson wrote:
>> I know there is one android/flightgear app that serves as a remote
>> control for flying FlightGear via your android phone--perhaps that is
>> what you found? It uses the network interface which provid
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
>
>> a look at the sources shows that a fixed polling interval is used for
>> telnet - default is 5Hz. So it cannot process more than 5 commands per
>> second. That's why it's slow. There's better methods of implementing
>> socket communica
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Roberto Inzerillo wrote:
> > I had been experimenting with adding cockpit controls to FlightGear
> > with the help of python. Unfortunately other things have gotten in the
> > way.. such as work and better weather for being outdoors!
> >
> > I gave up on the t
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:18 PM, wrote:
> After startup a big transparent "OK" shows up in the middle of the screen,
> can't find what is generating that message.
>
> Any ideas how to eliminate it, clicking the mouse on it clears, but can't
> always reach the mouse from the cockpit ;-)
>
Install
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Chris O'Neill wrote:
>
> the livery. If Mack Jermod (or anyone else for that matter) wants a Red
> Bull (or any other trademark) on their livery, then so be it but let
> Mack Jermod (and the others) distribute it themselves and assume any and
> all risk, not the FG
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Oliver Fels wrote:
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
...
>
> Oliver
>
> P.S.: Noted the sarkasm?
>
Yes, you spelt sarcasm wrong! :-P
--
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This pa
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Gene Buckle wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>
>> For those who use Linux, this might be the most interesting news today:
>>
>> http://www.debian.org/
>> http://www.archlinux.org/
>> http://www.opensuse.org/
>> http://www.gentoo.org/
>> http://grm
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:10 AM, J. Holden wrote:
> A number of Pacific Northwest airports have changed their identification.
>
> For instance Ranger Creek, WA (near Mt. Rainier) is now K21W (from 6WA8?).
>
> Pierce Co. Thun is now KPLU, from 1S0.
>
> Tillamook is now KTMK, from S47.
>
> How do w
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2011 18:43:11 Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
> > Ryan M writes:
> > > Something I've always thought about is an official aircraft repository
> > > that contained non-GPL2 aircraft- straight from the authors, of course.
> >
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:26:05 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
> <4df4943d.3030...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 12.06.2011 11:58, Michael Sgier wrote:
>> > http://www.androidzoom.com/android_games/cards_and_casino/flight-simulation_xcuh.html
>> >
>> >
On 19 October 2011 19:29, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
>
> https://gitorious.org/flightgear-aircraft
Last night, the discussion came up where the above page is slow to
load, in part it's due to 1.2MB of HTML code, plus the CSS, plus the
any images in use. Not very browser friendly. I hacked together a ph
On 25 October 2011 01:47, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> you need a RTI implementation. I can recommend the OpenRTI implentation
> from our fellow FlightGear developer Mathias:
> http://developer.berlios.de/projects/openrti/
> which you can clone from
> git://git.berlios.de/openrti
>
Btw
On 13 November 2011 10:12, Curtis Olson wrote:
> So now it would be interesting if fgrun could be used by end users to rate
> the aircraft in the different categories and then fgrun would pull the
> ratings from some server that tracks all this. :-)
> Curt.
>
But be careful what you wish for.
Ac
On 19 November 2011 12:29, Pedro Morgan wrote:
> Maybe the next xmas.. a couple of weeks before Xmas then.. and ready for new
> year, new versiion..
>
Pedro,
Considering the last release was August, what's to be gained by
another release in the next couple of months?
What would be on the Release
On 25 December 2011 22:39, Martin Spott wrote:
> HB-GRAL wrote:
>
>> Yes, right, mutiple stations. FGCom server down, all radio stations down.
>
> One FGcom server up, all radio stations up :-)
>
Which doesn't mitigate the single point of failure. :-P
Regards
George
-
On 31 December 2011 16:15, Ron Jensen wrote:
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/Special:RecentChanges
>
> Someone is spamming our wiki. Anyone around with admin rights?
>
> Thanks,
> Ron
>
I (with the help of the irc user jano, thanks) have undone the edit
that the spammer made to remove the spam links
On 7 February 2012 03:24, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> It is a very mixed bag when it comes to screenshots - some look good, some
> look old (bad?), some look fake - surely that would be a give-away to warn
> people away from it? :-)
>
And the 419 Nigerian scams doesn't work. Surely the suggestion of
Why do i feel that this has been discussed multiple times before and
the end result was to stick with the status quo... but anyway see
below.
Below I'm playing devils advocate a little bit.
On 20 February 2012 20:17, Jörg Emmerich wrote:
> Congratulation to all of you having worked hard on getti
On 21 February 2012 08:46, HB-GRAL wrote:
> Am 20.02.12 12:24, schrieb Martin Spott:
>>
>> http://mapserver.flightgear.org/getstart/
>>
>
> Hi Martin
>
> What is the difference between the Index and the Index at bottom of
> contents ? ;-)
>
Different Anchor IDs... so the extra index entry in t
In response to the auto-coordination question, it does need to be
there for users that do not have pedals or a twist stick joystick.
Ideally, the autopilot should either disable auto-coordination and
then restore state afterwards, if enabled by user or fly despite it.
I personally think that stat
On 4 July 2012 19:45, Erik Hofman wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 11:26 AM, Michael wrote:
>> Hi
>> is it possible to have different licences than GPL for sceneries etc.?
>> Now that would help fight piracy, while keeping GPL for the source code.
>
> No and no.
>
Correct form my understanding.
If someone
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:46 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 29 Dec 2008, at 08:40, Tim Moore wrote:
>
>> .4 meters seemed
>> sufficient to me, but others don't agree, so perhaps we can settle
>> on some value
>> larger than .1. The near plane value is settable, both in the camera
>> configuration
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:54:36 -0600, Tom wrote in message
> <1232938476.19707.15.ca...@big-laptop>:
>
>> Don't kid yourself about MSFS going away anytime soon...
>>
>> For the past couple years, MS has been flooding the market with their
>> com
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jones, Andrew
wrote:
> Thanx Scoot and Innis
>
> I've been to Jon's site and had email with Martin there.
>
> I think having an Oz 'chapter' would be a great idea, maybe Jon and Martin
> could give us our own bit of their web for dedicated Oz scenery (or we could
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Here's a hypothetical question.
>
> Let's say some company "A" builds an internal product prototype that
> incorporates FlightGear as part of a larger aggregate system. Let's say
> they even make a few small changes to FlightGear. Now they
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:34 AM, LeeE wrote:
> On Sunday 29 March 2009, Ron Jensen wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 01:55 -0700, syd adams wrote:
>> > I have to agree here ... seems pointless to keep them in cvs if
>> > gerard will have maintained versions available ...
>> > Also saves everyone's t
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Tim Moore wrote:
> Tim Moore wrote:
>> Durk Talsma wrote:
>>> On Friday 15 May 2009 20:31:17 Durk Talsma wrote:
>
>>>
>>> While trying to trap bad data in this the popMatrix function, I just
>>> noticed that a bad transformation matrix is already set up relatively
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:55 AM, George Patterson
wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Tim Moore wrote:
>> Tim Moore wrote:
>>> Durk Talsma wrote:
>>>> On Friday 15 May 2009 20:31:17 Durk Talsma wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> While tr
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Barry Fawthrop wrote:
Hi Barry,
I have taken a read of this email and can suggest a few things to try.
See my inline comments below.
> To All, Thanks Very Much
>
>
> Victhor: glxgears gives me between 882 - 1068 FPS 5450 frame in 5.0 seconds
>
This seems t
Hi All,
I don't necessarily see a dedicated radar view and ATC from Flightgear
being mutually exclusive.
There are times when you'd like to "stick your head out the window" to
watch the aircraft land.
This does bring extra complexities such as both programs needing to
know air craft positions, p
2009/8/31 Marco Lecora :
> Hi,
> I need to send from a C# application the position of several aircrafts to a
> flight gear multiplayer server.
> The question is ... how can I get the aircraft orientation values from
> position, yaw, pitch and roll?
> thank you in advance.
> marco
>
Hi Marco,
Y
Hi Tat,
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Tatsuhiro
Nishioka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Though I prefer an official release, I can live with beta release so we can
> avoid killing Durk ;-)
> I guess it is a good to have a release (in either official or beta) since we
> can have lots of feedback reports tha
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hmmm...
>
> For a short time this might be helping but
>
>
>>I have disabled the MP Aircrafts collisions with the rest of the world.
>
> ... but we also have a lot of AI aircrafts around and they don't announce
> there incoming. That make
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, AC001 wrote:
> Not sure who the admin is for the wiki, so I thought I'm mail this list.
>
> This page http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Air_bagan
>
To help narrowing it down: It's appears to be only that page as I was
able to login and browse some of the other
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Pete Morgan wrote:
>
> *Their mission is below.*
>
>
> All some of us need to do is to be there at the right time and the right
> place.. right ? We'll buzz them down ;-)
>
Nope.. that just validates the idea. "I'm not sure where all these
people came from b
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts & hopes are
> that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual move away from
> CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a number of developer
> features in
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
> Oh, it has a "select all" then? :) :) :)
>
I think someone is being anti-social. :-P :-P
Regards
George
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer C
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Pete Morgan wrote:
> Does the new sound system honour the command line options..
>
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Command_Line_Parameters#Features
>
> --disable-sound Disable sound effects
> --enable-sound Enable sound effects
>
>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Pete Morgan wrote:
> Right, I'm a web developer and been thinking a lot about the bug
> tracking (in my case across projects/ventures/etc), and applying that to
> FG. Thats my frustration ladies and gentlemen, and I apologize for my
> harshness sometimes; this com
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, syd adams > wrote:
> Yup.
> Apparently there's no limit to the depths they will sink.
>
>
But they keep bobbing to the surface. :-/
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Confe
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Here's a slightly different wrinkle (maybe) on this whole selling copies of
> FlightGear under dubious premises.
>
> In this case FlightGear is prominently displayed in the ebay ad, but later
> they claim:
>
> Copyright
> This item is copyrigh
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:34 PM, syd adams wrote:
> I,ve already fixed that , but have a few more panel fixes before I commit it
> ...
> Cheers
>
Hi Syd,
I was just thinking about the other obvious bug where the Citation-II
will tip backwards onto the left and right landing gear only.
Regards
2009/10/24 Chris Wilkinson :
> Hi there,
>
> I've downloaded and built fresh cvs copies of fg and sg tonite (Oct 24), and
> updated my osg to v2.95. When I first ran
> fg after the update I got a segfault when fg couldn't find part of the ac3d
> model of the 777-300ER, so I tried another
> jet (7
2009/11/10 Statto Software :
> I think I may have found the problem with the Center Runway texture not
> showing, but I'm not at all confident with my C++ skills, so someone will
> have to fix TerraGear for me.
>
> However, I've found this code in
> /terragear-cs/src/airports/GenAirports/rwy_*.c
>From a end-user perspective, at this point, I'd be vote No to moving
and No to the duplicating it.
The reason being is that the "3d Clouds" option is rendering only and
not a weather option. I'd expect similar cloud coverage for both 3d
clouds or the older method. Moving the option would mean tha
2009/11/17 Diego Fernando Rodríguez Varón :
> Hello everyone.
>
> I was experiencing the segmentation fault reported by Nicolas before so I
> just tried updating and compiling. But I get the following error:
>
> checking for boostlib >= 1.37.0... configure: error: We could not detect the
> boost
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Nathanael Rebsch wrote:
>
>> point though being, that a large amount of people are 'forced' to use it!
>> and therefore it aint a bad idea to know how to work with or around it!
>
> True.
>
> Erik
>
Some people have had some better success wi
2009/12/15 Scott Hamilton :
> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 21:30 +, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
>
> Being really really picky with English, the opening statement uses the
> word "heavily" too often; it's not good style. As a suggestion of
> replacement, perhaps;
>
> As many people will be aware, the
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Pete Morgan wrote:
>
> Do a search for "professional flight simulator", and an ad for Flight
> Pro Sim appears with the title.
>
> "Plight Pro Sim A Scam ?"
>
> Sound suspect to me
>
> http://m2.daffodil.uk.com/flight_pro_sim_scam.png
>
> Pete
>
Hi Pete,
I think
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Alan Teeder
> wrote:
> >
> > >From here I see the same as you with both A380.rgb and a380.rgb at
> > http://cvs.flightgear.org/viewvc/data/Aircraft/A380/Models/
> >
> > I deleted the A380 directory and re-ran C
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Simon Hollier wrote:
> Hey Martin,
>
> I don't think so as it appears to be last updated on the 30th of October.
>
> There is a user in Winnipeg, MB Canada that is sucking down an
> enormous amount of pages, but that isn't necessarily malicious.
>
Perhaps not howe
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:48 AM, John Denker wrote:
> At KSQL there is reproducibly a building sitting
> partially on a taxiway and even extending onto
> the runway a little bit.
>
> http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/img48/ksql-building-on-rwy.png
>
>
I have also been experiencing this issue so it's i
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Pete Morgan wrote:
>
>> can you file this bug formally at
>> http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/list
>> so we can track it
>
> I agree with Tim on the idea of trying to keep "feature requests" off
> the "bug"-list. Otherwise we'll
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
>> Heiko Schulz wrote:
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a
>> new version! Isn't it surprising?
>> >
>> > Did you know that many of the technologies used in
>> FlightGear are the same within FlightPro
2010/3/26 Pete Morgan :
> Dear Richard Branston,
>
At risk of being a pedant, I'd imagine that it would have gone in the
virtual bin at the point of reading the first line. Attention to
details is important.
Hi Pete,
So you are proposing that a third party airline distributes the
FlightGear CD a
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Pete Morgan wrote:
> I'm playing with an MP map, and have bumped into some issues with
> callsign's containing strange characters (can mess with json encoding).
>
> Should the callsign not be restricted to the characters "-" and 0-9,
> a-z, A-Z ?
>
> recent notabl
Hi Oliver,
If mpserver02 is using 10-15 Gigabytes a day, do we know what data the
other servers are using?
I'm just wondering what percentage of the 10-15 gig is due to people
being too "lazy" to connect to the most appropriate mpserver.
If the above theory is correct, it would be a good reason n
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Victhor wrote:
> Hmmm, AFAIK we couldn't get things like moving map displays anyway...
> and some of those GPSes have turn-by-turn navigation for use with cars,
> which is kinda cool, as they're pretty expensive :0)
With the better car GPS units spotting when you
Hi James,
That looks very nice. I appreciate the self explained interface.
What's the license for Hudson?
Regards
George
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Tom P wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> That's an awesome setup, very interesting.
>
> Would you have a tarball of this configuration and some detail
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:41 PM, wrote:
>
> You're probably right, they phrase is differently: the non-commercial API may
> only be used in 'open source' projects...
>
> I don't know why, but it does not matter to me: I like 'open source' !
>
It's bigger than just open versus non-commercial? T
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Peter Morgan
wrote:
> This aint working for me..
> its a 2.5gig package and lots of bandwith for the "core" pancake.
> the core "snaphost" includes ALL the aircraft and more that 40%+ abandoned..
> redundant space. shite load of DEAD files...
> Aircraft deginers
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Innis Cunningham wrote:
> Hi All
> Have been trying to get onto IRC for a couple of hours each time
> I get a timed out message is there a problem.Other IRC sites seem
> to be working fine.
>
> Cheers
> Innis
>
If you are referring to irc.flightgear.org, you are
/issues/list
I would suggest that you keep in touch with the this devel list in
case someone else is considering working on the same issue.
Regards
George Patterson
--
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Chris Wilkinson
wrote:
> Do you guys really wanna know how corrupt the character behind FSP is?
>
Snipped
> This guy is laughing in the face of the free software world, sponging off
> the hard work of others. I think its time to wipe the grin from his face. I
> i
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Peter Brown
wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Victhor wrote:
>
> The individual responsible for the page put this there:
> "1.Sponsoring a child - many kids in our world that aren't able to get
> even the basic stuff, like food, simple health care, and school
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Chris Wilkinson
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I reported author 'Dan H Freeman' to that website as being misleading about
> his software and running a scam, explaining the situation with FlightGear
> and ProFlightSim. They asked if I was a 'representative' of FlightGear.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> It appears that Gitorious is off-line. I can't get to the home page or any
> other pages (I get 503 Service Unavailable errors) and I can't do any updates
> to my repository. But I can ping both git.gitorious.org and gitorious.org.
> Anyone
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>>
>> http://www.airbusflightsimulator.com/index.html
>> http://www.airbusflightsimulator.com/buy-flight-simulator.html
>> http://www.airbusflightsimulator.com/flight-simulator-planes.html
>>
>
> A mail to Airbus should be enough to d
Michael,
If you are reading through the wiki and find something that has been
answered elsewhere, feel free to add it.. All wiki pages do not have a
maintainer as such so feel free. Note: This doesn't apply to the wiki
home page.
We can always revert inadvertent edits that have gone awry. :-D
Re
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Michael Sgier wrote:
>
> Those crappy pirates are going on my nervesWhy not add some convoluted
> code to display:
>
> Flightgear.org fly free
>
> or alike at various in game stages? Should not be that complicated?
>
It would be better would be to release a n
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Erik Hofman wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 18:57 -0500, r...@aol.com wrote:
>> http://www.pilotsofamerica.com/forum/showthread.php?p=667522#post667522
>>
>> Thought you'd find this interesting
>
> Sure, the guy you quoted it only posts scam related posts to that fo
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> He he... well, let me guess?
> We still don't have a laywer who can fight those shit?
>
> As we all know the truth behind it should be clear for all that there are
> copyright infringements clearly visible?
>
> Even if they can take FGFS and
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Gene Buckle wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Spott wrote:
>
>> "J. Holden" wrote:
>>
>>> With a large addition to the database today, there are now 2009
>>> unique models in the scenery model database!
>>
>> 2035, to be precise ;-))
>>
> Jeeze, two more will m
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:09 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> Oliver Schroeder wrote:
>
> > A RADAR station can be implemented as a listener to the server, so the
> > server
> > sends information of aircrafts to the radar just as to any other client.
> > Maybe I have to add some minor changes to th
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 23:37 +, Lee Elliott wrote:
> On Thursday 05 Jan 2006 22:46, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> > Martin Spott wrote:
> > >Hello Durk,
> > >
> > >Durk Talsma wrote:
> > >>I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with
> > >> AI traffic, but that these systems should be
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:02 +0200, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > > So the solution is to display a template / generic plane.
> >
> > We can always use the dreaded glider model (the one that shows up when
> > there are errors in XML files).
>
> The UFO sounds more appropriate...
But least reali
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 04:02 +0200, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > The universal solution is to download the plane from the person who uses
> > it (the download protocoll must be included in the FGFS network code).
>
> Isn't that too big a security hole? It's OK to assume that your airplanes
> cod
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 23:21 +0100, Christian Mayer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Torsten Dreyer schrieb:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > i made a new aircraft and placed it here:
> >
> > http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/
> >
> > It's name is ogeL.
> >
> > ogeL?
>
> LOL!
>
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 20:25 -0500, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
> On January 9, 2006 04:19 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> > In nasal, I would like to check if a string ends in '.wav'. Is there an
> > easy way to do this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Curt.
>
> You can try this:
>
> substr(foo, size(foo) -
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 17:28 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
>
> > Someone find out how much we are paying Fred, and then double it. :-)
>
> We should invite him to a couple of free flights over nice looking
> terrain ;-)
>
Send Fred an invite to the next virtual fly-
Hi All,
I'm interested in "forking" the code from airtraffic.sourceforge.net. The
orginal author doesn't seem to be responding to any emails. Oh well
Currently it is written in python, which I probably will stick with for
a while. I would obviously expand it to allow for Flightgear MP. Perhaps
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:34 +0100, Markus Barenhoff wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> i want to ask if there is are any efforts in implementing a FMC for
> flightgear? i'd like to have one for the 737, because in long term i
> want a free 737 like the one from PMDG for the MSFS...
>
> cu Markus
>
Hello Mar
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 11:10 -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Pigeon wrote:
>
> >>We might get money thrown at us if we somehow tie AJAX into the project. ;-)
> >>
> >>
> >
> >We're set! FGMap uses AJAX :P
> >
> >
> >
>
> Pigeon,
>
> Can I suggest a feature request for your online multip
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 22:00 +0100, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shall we update the KSFO tile in cvs with the data available in the world
> scenery?
> Or which copy is the /master/ copy here?
>
> The problem I try to solve is that multiplayer clients should all use the
> exactly same scene
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 23:45 +, leee wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 18:09, Joacim Persson wrote:
> > I have an idea of how to at least partially fix the problem with the "wall
> > of weather" when flying with METAR updates, which when flying on autopilot
> > in a light aircraft often, not
Hi All,
I am starting a personal coding project which will require a GUI to
connect to fgfs in order to read and write to the internal properties.
(That's the current scope in a 10 words or less).
As I was going through the src/scripts/python directory I saw
FGFSDemo.py and had a quick read thoug
Hi All,
I recently cvs up'ed my Flightgear data and I have noticed that the fuel
tank gauges on the left hand cockpit panel is rotated roughly 30 degress
counter clockwise with only the top of the left guage visible.
I'll upload a screen shot later if it would clarify the problem.
A smaller issu
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 10:19 +0100, Nick Warne wrote:
> On Saturday 28 April 2007 02:40:57 Pigeon wrote:
> > > I just finished a fresh compile of FG and OSG today, then I've found a
> > > bug (which I've been told to be solved in the past): I can pilot not
> > > only one, but two airplanes ;-) it is
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 03:10 +0200, gh.robin wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
> we have Flying Carriers.
>
> Here snapshots
>
> http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying1.jpg
> http://perso.orange.fr/GRTux/Carrier-Flying2.jpg
> http://p
Hi All,
I have been trying to get flightgear to compile and not having much
luck.
When running fgfs, the widow is displayed followed almost immediately by
a Segmentation Fauly (core dump).
I initially though it was due to the ealery revision of OSG that I was
using (2007-05-15} but not sure now.
On Jan 22, 2008 12:53 AM, Csaba Halász <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2008 2:32 PM, Nagy Mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We noticed a rather peculiar effect, having landed our plane near
> > (under) a grey parking passenger jet. Fiddling with our flight controls
> > made the control s
On Jan 23, 2008 4:38 AM, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Stuart Buchanan -- Tuesday 22 January 2008:
> > If not, I wonder whether I should just move them to somewhere
> > less prominent in the wiki with a disclaimer, as they are
> > currently more prominent than they deserve to be, I
On Jan 25, 2008 1:16 PM, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:51:55 +1100, George wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Jan 23, 2008 4:38 AM, Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > * Stuart Buchanan -- Tuesday 22 January 2008:
> > > > If not, I w
On Jan 25, 2008 1:46 PM, George Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2008 1:16 PM, Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:51:55 +1100, George wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
>
Hi All,
I have edited the Installing_Scenery page in the wiki by fleshing out the
TODOs a little more.
http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=Installing_Scenery
If someone could do something for fgadmin, that would remove the last TODO
on that page :-)
What's the next page to
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Anders Gidenstam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > Now on to my hairbrained idea ... (?) I wonder if this MP model could
> > communicate new locations through the generic MP fields, such that everyone
> > could pick up t
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Heiko Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>
> >
> > IOW: under these circumstances I'm not going to
> > waste my time
> > on the wiki.
> >
> > m.
> >
>
>
> That's why you SHOULD put it in the wiki - it will
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Gijs de Rooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > EG. I have just made a small edit to the front page which was to
> > remove a fixed width of 500 pixels which messes up the page on a
> > narrow screen or browser width.
>
> Ok, I didn't test it on a smaller
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Gijs de Rooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The two portals are listed twice.
> > once to the left of the heading saying "Welcome to..." The other
> > instance is listed under "Please choose a portal". My preference is to
> > lose them from the top as its less to
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
