found one
minor error in fhopen() which I will correct, but I don't think anyone is using
fhopen().
fhopen is used by userland NFS/AFS servers/utilities.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why
* Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011012 01:30] wrote:
Well, I've been watching everyone argue about the value of interrupt
coalescing in the net drivers, so I decided to port terry's patch to 4.4
-current to see what the results are. The patch included applies cleanly
to 4.4's if_dc,
on the board to do what you want.
No matter how hard you tweak the board, an interrupt may still
trigger while you process a hardware interrupt, this causes an
additional poll which can cause additional coalescing.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using
in a bunch Mike. :-)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
of the devfs sysctl as
done in vinum.
If libdisk does it a different way, then vinum should be updated.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send
* Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011003 15:33] wrote:
As you've already noticed, sysinstall basically tries to create the
device nodes it needs under the old assumption that /dev will be
mostly empty. Now that devfs is the default, phk needs to update
libdisk so that it doesn't
of a chance.
At least tack on a smiley or let them know that you'd like them
to try harder instead of just going away.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom
mind those flames, they are alway there and help nothing...
You've never heard the reasoning behind teaching men to fish? :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated
* Donny Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010925 03:40] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Can someone please share with us the magic to disable acpi and add
it to src/UPDATING, my sound fell victim to acpi and i think I just
lost my mouse to it. Now I have a lapbrick that consumes less
power
Can someone please share with us the magic to disable acpi and add
it to src/UPDATING, my sound fell victim to acpi and i think I just
lost my mouse to it. Now I have a lapbrick that consumes less
power...
yay
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software
* Nick Hibma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010908 04:51] wrote:
Why don't you add an early-out for namelength = 15 or put the
if-statement in the loop:
This is a good idea, however it fails for the case when everyone
has been assigned usernames that are less than 15 characters, I
would suggest putting
this will fix the problem with sound (pcm) that I
mailed you about earlier?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
* Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010903 03:47] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
The reason for the macro is that when the size paramter is a constant
there's an evil trick that makes selecting the malloc bucket really
cheap.
That's not the reason. The size parameter
the malloc options to
see how much of a difference it makes, I would assume it could
be quite substantial.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
'Java
: Ethernet address: 00:90:d1:07:4e:22
pccard1: function 0 CCR at 0 offset 3e0: 45 80 22 ff, ff ff ff ff, ff
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
'Java
for the macro is that when the size paramter is a constant
there's an evil trick that makes selecting the malloc bucket really
cheap.
Please don't remove it.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software
to be a replacement for PC-BIOSes,
as long as it's a drop in replacement FreeBSD should run just fine
on top of it, there shouldn't be any modifications needed to be done
to FreeBSD.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why
* aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010828 16:19] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010828 15:37] wrote:
I have been wondering if fbsd people would like to move into the
openbios.org direction? Well, at least I for myself would _dream_
* Carlo Dapor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010827 13:49] wrote:
How about this . . .
Although not running a multi-processor machine, are there guinnea-pigs, like
me, who run current and do not mind carrying Julians work in our kernel.
As I understand there is no set time-line for SMPng integration,
* Kazutaka YOKOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010818 03:02] wrote:
I posted the following message in the stable ML the other day, but got
no response. So, I will post it here again.
Please follow the thread PATCH: syscons.c sysctl for PC-Reboo Keys
in the stable ML for background information on
I would suggest is
writing a daemon that monitors the size of the file and keeps
it both mmap(2)'s and mlocked(2), this would be trivial to do and
would force the system to keep the file in memory.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my
this to
be your usual of breakage of ssh around -release time. :)
Please keep it 1,2 at least for the time being.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
ever decided how it should be
properly fixed, or if it should be fixed at all.
considering the recent breakage wrt to PAM i'm more than happy
to apply a diff to fix this. flamage will be repsonded to in
my usual manner and we'll have the problem fixed. please
submit patches.
--
-Alfred Perlstein
== 0x4a, scsi status == 0x0
(da4:isp3:0:5:0): removing device entry
Is diskcheckd still on by default? If so, can whomever enabled it
turn it off? If not I'll be 'fixing' this oversight this afternoon.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called
* Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010718 16:56] wrote:
Still on by default.
In my queue then.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
has the ALiMAGiK1 M1647
chipset.
There are several other people with this hardware having the same
problem.Is there a fix?.
I doubt that FreeBSD is your problem. which version of xfree are
you using? i would try installing the 4.1.0 version of xfree from
ports or packages.
--
-Alfred
parameter, the INET6 code would
call it with it set to zero, however most other consumers would
call it with it set to one meaning they can block.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe: send
for an assignment, unless
that assignment spans multiple dependant operations or is dependant
on some pre-condition, cases:
/* no lock */
foo-a = 5;
/* needs lock */
if (foo-b)
foo-a = 5;
/* might need lock to protect agianst inconsistant view */
foo-a = 5;
foo-b = c;
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL
frozen
at creation time (i think)
Work is here, it's a diff relative to FreeBSD-current + your patch.
http://sneakerz.org/~bright/pg_mine.diff
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe
with -stable. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010712 01:45] wrote:
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010712 01:42] wrote:
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does
int
@@ -224,9 +215,7 @@
{
int error;
- fhold(fp);
error = (*fp-f_ops-fo_stat)(fp, sb, p);
- fdrop(fp, p);
return (error);
}
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing
in a good way?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010712 01:42] wrote:
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010711 19:08] wrote:
The patch and the results of build test are now on the web page.
The discussion of ktrace(2) problem does not cover the solution of
BSD/OS, so it needs updating.
I'm
to flush the cached information. Instead of that, we should
watch for release of mutexes. When a process no longer holds any
mutexes except for Giant, it is safe to flush cached information to
ktrace.
Yes, it's pretty gross. :(
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010710 03:46] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 03:20:44 -0500,
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
wait for me to finish, but it seems like no one has stepped forward
to review
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010707 16:43] wrote:
* Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010702 03:13] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:04:31 +0900,
Seigo Tanimura tanimura said:
Seigo The results of build test with the latest patch are now at:
Seigo http://people.FreeBSD.org
* David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010707 18:06] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 04:42:49PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I'm going to be giving this code some testing, not that you have to
wait for me to finish, but it seems like no one has stepped forward
to review this. I'd like to see
an option to allow this. The reason, I think, is
that you don't want non-root users to be able to grab the console
output as it may allow them to obscure evil behavior. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing
mistakes and confusion as a thread is
not really a process.
It gets sort of confusing, as I'm not really sure where the thread
actually is, #3 or #4, it's actually 4, however you can only run
'amount of #3' threads at the same time.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote
for use with DEVFS. Is that still the case?
I fixed that. :) Let me and Grog know if you have problems.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'?
And why do my programs keep crashing in it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
* Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 01:47] wrote:
Hi -current people,
I have recently made some significant changes to the mbuf allocator.
Although I have invested, along with several other developers, very significant
time in testing the newly introduced code, should any
* Alexander N. Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 10:46] wrote:
UP kernel can not be compiled in -CURRENT after your changes because
kern/subr_mbuf.c references mp_ncpus variable, which is defined only in SMP
case. Should this variable be moved out of #ifdef SMP?
Yes, I asked for this months
, or that the interface
will settle down enough so that I can get started on it.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
it was tested.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
that I've reverted my current system
back to RELENG_4 :-)
Afaik the problem was that fsck would wipe certain stats info that
dirpref would use, however I think the kernel detects absurd values
and will reinit them.
I could be way off about this though. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED
with a new layout
policy that's just recently been discovered, basically there may be
unforseen issues. Personally I'd like to see snapshots and background
fsck backported. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start
as it will catch people that
expect vm state to remain unchanged across several calls.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
.
Hopefully swapping is working now. The changes I made are perhaps overly
conservative, so there may still be some more changes coming down the pipeline
to push down Giant a bit farther.
;)
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology
.
Thanks for taking the time to do this.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current
. :)
Patches, suggestions and crashdumps would be helpful.
Bruce has been giving me some helpful tracebacks that I'm planning
to use to stabilize the system.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why
this is about all, dumping is not
possible... let's hope for the best.
Luckily, console based CD players also exist.grin
That patch was committed to -current several hours ago.
you should have version 1.57 of sys/kern/sysv_shm.c.
Of course this only fixes sysv shm, not swapping.
--
-Alfred
);
/*
@@ -1689,6 +1689,7 @@
if (object)
vm_object_pip_wakeupn(object, bp-b_npages);
+ mtx_unlock(vm_mtx);
/*
* release the physical I/O buffer
*/
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010519 21:57] wrote:
* Szilveszter Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010519 16:53] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I guess I was just being too happy so it had to get me this time:-) I was
building Mozilla when it struck. Today's -CURRENT, kernel world in sync
traceback?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
as a useful guide
for making finer grained locks as well as error checking the new
locks.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology,
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send
* Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010423 23:27] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
requires vm_page_queues_mtx:
manipulation of vm_page_queues
[snip]
pmaps spotted:
pmap_copy_page
pmap_page_protect
There is potential for nasty lock ordering conflicts here
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010423 21:51] wrote:
You can find the work I've done so far to make a giant vm mutex
here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/vm.diff
I've refreshed the diff, it now makes it to:
vfs_default.c 545 - recurses on vm_mtx here, oops
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010424 08:36] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Wollman write
s:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:51:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You can find the work I've done so far to make a giant vm mutex
here:
The Mach code we
AF_MAX
and #include net/radix.h from sys/mount.h
Nice, go for it.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
/SGML, which is the
markup language used for the Handbook, FAQ, and so on.
[snip]
I'd very much like to get comments from people.
Sounds like some excellent work that was long over due. Go for it. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.egr.unlv.edu/~slumos/on-netbsd.html
opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s
vm_page_count_target
vm_paging_target
vm_paging_needed
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.egr.unlv.edu/~slumos/on-netbsd.html
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
.
Was it just my badluck ?
I think there was groff breakage.
-Vlad
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/
To Unsubsc
to directory caching
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
n the next couple of days unless a stability
issue comes up.
I'll leave it to those people with low memory to remember to turn
it off.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail
.
Meaning if we happen to copyin() a 4 meg buffer we can allow more
than one process to be completing some sort of work inside the
kernel other than spinning on the giant lock.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "
the
:kernel mutexed. The least complex way to accomplish this is to only
:preempt kernel processes that hold no mutex (low level) locks.
:
:--
:-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I wish it were that simple. Remember when we went to shared file
descriptor arrays
and code paths.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
, I was 19 or 20 at the time. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010417 17:02] wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 April 2001 at 1:19:57 -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010415 23:16] wrote:
For example, all this work on a preemptive
kernel is just insane. Our entire
* Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010417 17:47] wrote:
...
Interrupts by definition know precisely what they are going to do, so by
definition they know precisely which mutexes (if any) they may need
to get. This means that, in fact, it is possible to implement a check
to
it as is until after
the release date.
As far as tracking down the problem I don't have the resources in
terms of hardware, code and time for that right now, however it
looks like you've found a possible bug.
Please keep us in the loop on this.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED
* E.B. Dreger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010417 18:36] wrote:
In this case, why not have a memory allocator similar to Hoard?
It doesn't work, but it's close:
http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/memcache/
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up
* E.B. Dreger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010417 18:48] wrote:
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:28:40 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) interrupts are again fan-in, meaning if you block an interrupt
class on one cpu you block them on all cpus
When would this be a bad case
ONN 3 /* int: max leng
th of connection q */
usr.sbin/rpcbind/rpcbind.c: listen(fd, SOMAXCONN);
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.egr.unlv.edu/~slumos/on-netbsd.html
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010412 10:11] wrote:
If we manage it, mountd should soon be able to allow different mount flags
for each path you export in /etc/exports.
I'm sorry. But now after some investigations and talks with Robert
Watson it seems to be clear that this is not
CC'ing phk, whose mailbox is obviously too empty.
I think I'm seeing the same thins...
At boot I see a kernel printf "warning: /var was not properly
dismounted" then /var mounts. If I unmount it and fsck it it's
dirty.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represen
ices" doesn't seem to work anymore.
What I'd like you to do is try to disable your floppy drive
and/or lpt port without removing it from your kernel.
If it's possible please let me know.
thanks,
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
IRQs for anything else unless you remove the drivers
from the kernel?
Why?
Also, is there any system in place so that I can tell a device to
go away? (one that isn't pccard/cardbus) ?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.o
need to remove the
signal handler's use of malloc, basically rework the problem they
are trying to solve.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
% nfsd
14848 root 960 26912K 26832K RUN1 0:04 0.00% 0.00% ld
424 bright 40 2120K 1340K select 0 0:04 0.00% 0.00% rxvt
no cpu time, known issue?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org
and taking the first answer you
get back.
Is the whole reason you need to do this because you're using the
xid to differentiate between the servers?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Represent yourself, show up at BABUG http://www.babug.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010326 19:57] wrote:
* Bill Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010326 16:05] wrote:
Why can't you just enable sigio on the reply socket, send all the
requests with a 0 timeout and then wait for a signal to either
interrupt the sending or to notify you when you
.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre
.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre
* The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010323 16:17] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010323 16:09] wrote:
Now, I do have DDB enabled in the kernel ... but, for the life of me, I
can't seem to find any docs on the keystroke
you run mergemaster?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsu
.
Maybe I won't build -CURRENT for a little while :-}
Don't worry, ru fixed it, I'm about to undo the whole schebang
because sys/socket.h shouldn't have this definition.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "
There's rumors that something is broken in keyserv, if someone can
get me a good diagnostics on how to reproduce the failure/problem
I should be able to fix it. Of course patches are welcome as well.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece
ad.
It's on an i386 based system with source from 21th March.
AOL
Same here.
/AOL
JERKCITY
T USERS MORE INFO PLZ K THNX.
/JERKCITY
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start
151udp 0.0.0.0.3.237 mountd superuser
151tcp 0.0.0.0.3.251 mountd superuser
10928305672udp 0.0.0.0.11.233 - superuser
Any of you folks tried recompiling CFS?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED
this.
But they seem to be harmless.
--
B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: vinumconfig.c
Applied, thank you.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Daemon News Magazine
a chance someone will jump in with the answer you're
looking for.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
the BABUG meeting on Thursday? There's gonna be a film
crew from IBM-Linux there and a tutorial on netbooting.
http://www.bafug.net/meetings/NextMeetingBerk.html
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
/memcpy as suggested?
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ *ri = 0;
*ri = '\0';
+ printf("%s", r);
+ free(r);
+ return len;
return (len);
}
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
think only because you have "freebsd.org" in your "search" directive.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
it sum up the stats instead of displaying them
inidividually.
I would look at fixing iostat because libdevstat seems to provide
all the data needed.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu
. It
will eventually go away, and the longer we keep it as a crutch,
the more people are going to be hurt by it when/if it disappears
completely.
Those people need to fix thier modules. :)
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
* Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010311 02:29] wrote:
I'll sneak in my experience with DEVFS+vinum here as well:
vinum: loaded
vinum: reading configuration from /dev/da3s1f
vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da1s1e
vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da2s1e
301 - 400 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
