Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[copious snippage]
2. Cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf which contains the file MYKERNEL
No it doesn't. CVSup will delete the files it doesn't know about, so
you should *SAVE a copy* of your favorite kernel config file outside of
the source tree and
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-01-14 11:56, Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
from different sources I have written my steps to compile a new kernel
upgrade to the latest sources.
Your instructions, however, are different from what /usr/src/UPDATING
contains.
Please,
On Sunday 14 January 2007 15:44, kbtrace wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-01-14 11:56, Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf which contains the file MYKERNEL
No it doesn't. CVSup will delete the files it doesn't know about, so
you should *SAVE a copy*
John Nielsen wrote:
On Sunday 14 January 2007 15:44, kbtrace wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2007-01-14 11:56, Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf which contains the file MYKERNEL
No it doesn't. CVSup will delete the files it doesn't
--- Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On:56, Dino Vliet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
from different sources I have written my steps to
compile a new kernel
upgrade to the latest sources.
Your instructions, however, are different from what
/usr/src/UPDATING
contains.
On 1/14/07, Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Hello,
from different sources I have written my steps to
compile a new kernel upgrade to the latest sources.
doesn't /usr/src/UPDATING istn't enough for you? Anyway...
1.Make sure that the cvsup file (src-supfile) is
adjusted in
On 2007-01-14 15:35, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[copious snippage]
2. Cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf which contains the file MYKERNEL
No it doesn't. CVSup will delete the files it doesn't know about, so
you should *SAVE a copy* of your
Hello.
I am planning to upgrade two servers from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2, as soon as
it is released.
I would like to know how to proceed. I have not been able to find
instructions on freebsd.org (please forgive me if I have missed something).
Thanks in advance.
--
Guillermo Moreno-Socías
On Friday 12 January 2007 07:24, Guill. Moreno-Socias wrote:
Hello.
I am planning to upgrade two servers from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2, as
soon as it is released.
I would like to know how to proceed. I have not been able to
find instructions on freebsd.org (please forgive me if I have
On 1/12/07, Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 12 January 2007 07:24, Guill. Moreno-Socias wrote:
Hello.
I am planning to upgrade two servers from FreeBSD 5.4 to 6.2, as
soon as it is released.
I would like to know how to proceed. I have not been able to
find
Thanks in advance to anyone who could please help me deal with these errors:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/cvsupconfig]# portupgrade -a
.
.
--- Upgrading 'p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.001' to
'p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.002'
(archivers/p5-IO-Compress-Base)
--- Building '/usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO
freebsd 6.1
xorg 6.9
Hey, I have gnome 2.12
trying to upgrade to 2.16
i tried everything from pkg_add (obviously deleting the old one first)
to portmanager
to portinstall
to port upgrade
and building it from the ports tree..
things fail one major problem I was having was gail... but i
you have least 1.9 version to
have the
upgrade succeed.
Portupgrade users:
pkgdb -Ff
portupgrade -rf pkg-config\*
Brgds
Dino
Forwarded Message
From: Dan Sikorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:30:10 -0500
Subject:upgrading
the actual switch from 2.0 to 2.2 should be rather self explanitory, but what
i really want to know, is what about things like php5 and extensions? will
those have to all be rebuilt before 2.2 will work as 2.0 did?
thanks,
jonathan
___
-0800 (PST)
Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi peeps,
on my freebsd 6.1 amd64 system upgrading gtkhtml
gives
me an error when
I use portupgrade -aRr:
checking for msgfmt... /usr/local/bin/msgfmt
checking for dcgettext... no
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/local/bin/msgfmt
Hi folks,
when I upgrade guppi on my amd64 system running
freebsd 6.1 with
portupgrade -aRr, I get the following error:
gtk12 -I/usr/local/include/glib12 -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-Wall -Wunused -c
guppi-config-model.c -fPIC -DPIC -o
Hi peeps,
on my freebsd 6.1 amd64 system upgrading gtkhtml gives
me an error when
I use portupgrade -aRr:
checking for msgfmt... /usr/local/bin/msgfmt
checking for dcgettext... no
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/local/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/local/bin/xgettext
checking for catalogs
Hi peeps,
on my freebsd 6.1 amd64 system upgrading gtkhtml gives
me an error when
I use portupgrade -aRr:
checking for msgfmt... /usr/local/bin/msgfmt
checking for dcgettext... no
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/local/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/local/bin/xgettext
checking for catalogs
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 12:45:03 -0800 (PST)
Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi peeps,
on my freebsd 6.1 amd64 system upgrading gtkhtml gives
me an error when
I use portupgrade -aRr:
checking for msgfmt... /usr/local/bin/msgfmt
checking for dcgettext... no
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr
On Monday 16 October 2006 21:56, bsd wrote:
From what I have read so far I guess I'll stick to the 'classic'
procedure and boot in single user to do the merging things.
I never bother with mergemaster if it's just a point release. These usually
just involve small patches. No-one is going to
Eric wrote:
i find portmaster all. give it a whirl. No dependencies, its actively
maintained, etc.
Oh, yeah, I'd forgotten about that one. So there are three competing
technologies - portupgrade, portmaster, and portmanage. And I'm not
even sure what any of them offer over the simple 'make
Jonathan Arnold writes:
So there are three competing technologies - portupgrade,
portmaster, and portmanage. And I'm not even sure what any of
them offer over the simple 'make install clean' method.
Simple make/make install will take care of upstream
dependencies; portupgrade (and
I'm confused - what is sort of the consensus pick for best port
tool? Usually, I just cd /usr/ports// and do a 'make install clean',
but I've also tried portmanager and portupgrade, but I'm not sure when to
prefer one to another. Should I stick with one? Will mixing matching
confuse
On Tuesday October 17, 2006 at 08:47:27 (AM) Jonathan Arnold wrote:
I'm confused - what is sort of the consensus pick for best port
tool? Usually, I just cd /usr/ports// and do a 'make install clean',
but I've also tried portmanager and portupgrade, but I'm not sure when to
prefer
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Tuesday October 17, 2006 at 08:47:27 (AM) Jonathan Arnold wrote:
I'm confused - what is sort of the consensus pick for best port
tool? Usually, I just cd /usr/ports// and do a 'make install clean',
but I've also tried portmanager and portupgrade, but I'm not
Hello,
I have CVS-UP configured to follow RELENG_5_4
I was wondering if there is a way to patch (upgrading from 5.4-
RELEASE-p8 to a higher version) my system without going into the
classic :
# make -j4 buildworld
# make -j4 buildkernel
# make -j4 installkernel
# shutdown now
And booting
Hello,
I have CVS-UP configured to follow RELENG_5_4
I was wondering if there is a way to patch (upgrading from 5.4-
RELEASE-p8 to a higher version) my system without going into the
classic :
# make -j4 buildworld
# make -j4 buildkernel
# make -j4 installkernel
# shutdown now
/06 12:40 -0500]:
Hello,
I have CVS-UP configured to follow RELENG_5_4
I was wondering if there is a way to patch (upgrading from 5.4-
RELEASE-p8 to a higher version) my system without going into the
classic :
# make -j4 buildworld
# make -j4 buildkernel
# make -j4 installkernel
# shutdown now
RELENG_5_4
I was wondering if there is a way to patch (upgrading from 5.4-
RELEASE-p8 to a higher version) my system without going into the
classic :
# make -j4 buildworld
# make -j4 buildkernel
# make -j4 installkernel
# shutdown now
And booting in single user //
# fsck -p
# mount -u /
# mount
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a way to patch (upgrading from 5.4-
RELEASE-p8 to a higher version) my system without going into the
classic :
Considering that the system is like 10,000 km away,I cannot pay it a
visit when I need to boot to single mode.
So, I doeverything in multi user
Hi list,
/usr/ports/UPDATING reads:
20061009:
AFFECTS: users of any ports using Python
AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After upgrading of lang/python, you must rebuild all its consumer
ports to make them get ready to Python 2.5.
To do this, you will need to:
pkgdb -uf
Hi All,
I would like to upgrade the firmware on my Areca ARC-1210 SATA RAID
card. Has anyone out there done this, and if so, do you have any advice
on doing it?
I have downloaded a program called archttp32 that appears to be a
FreeBSD 4.2 32-bit version of the Arec http proxy server but I really
On Oct 9, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Bob Willcox wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to upgrade the firmware on my Areca ARC-1210 SATA RAID
card. Has anyone out there done this, and if so, do you have any
advice
on doing it?
I have downloaded a program called archttp32 that appears to be a
FreeBSD 4.2
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:35:25 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions
you wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to upgrade the firmware on my Areca ARC-1210 SATA RAID
card. Has anyone out there done this, and if so, do you have any advice
on doing it?
Any tips, pointers, advice, or warnings would be
On 10/9/06, Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to upgrade the firmware on my Areca ARC-1210 SATA RAID
card. Has anyone out there done this, and if so, do you have any advice
on doing it?
I have downloaded a program called archttp32 that appears to be a
FreeBSD 4.2 32-bit
On 10/9/06, Bob Willcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to upgrade the firmware on my Areca ARC-1210 SATA RAID
card. Has anyone out there done this, and if so, do you have any advice
on doing it?
I have downloaded a program called archttp32 that appears to be a
FreeBSD 4.2 32-bit
jan gestre wrote:
On 10/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
hi guys,
i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
portupgrade, both
methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i
fix it
:( is there a problem
On 10/6/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
On 10/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
hi guys,
i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
portupgrade, both
methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i
On 10/6/06, jan gestre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/6/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
On 10/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
hi guys,
i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
portupgrade
upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
portupgrade, both
methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how
did i
fix it
:( is there a problem with the amavisd-new port?
TIA
Hi,
could you concretize a bit, please? What kind of error do you get
jan gestre wrote:
hi guys,
i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
portupgrade, both
methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i
fix it
:( is there a problem with the amavisd-new port?
TIA
Hi,
could you concretize a bit, please? What kind
On 10/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jan gestre wrote:
hi guys,
i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and
portupgrade, both
methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i
fix it
:( is there a problem with the amavisd-new port
hi guys,
i tried upgrading the amavisd-new port via portmanager and portupgrade, both
methods failed, i had a similar problem before but i forgot how did i fix it
:( is there a problem with the amavisd-new port?
TIA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hello Gurus
Im on FreeBSD 6.1-R decided to upgrade the src tree and for security
reasons only
so i did the following
cvsup srcall and ports (RELENG_6_1)
changed /etc/make.conf to
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
NO_PROFILE=
cd /usr/src
# make buildworld
# make buildkernel
# make installkernel
# reboot
the
- Original Message -
From: Marwan Sultan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: buildworld upgrading advise please.
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:29:01 +
Hello Gurus
Im on FreeBSD 6.1-R decided to upgrade the src tree and for
security reasons only
Hello
Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira antivirus
+ postgrey
and some small auxiliary services.
We have approx 2500 users / mailboxes and
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
--
Gerard
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
* On 14/09/06 16:51 +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
| Hello
|
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
|
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--
Cordialement
Frank Bonnet
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
--- Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around
10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason
that SATA or RAID with
SATA is
Frank Bonnet wrote:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I need SCSI Disks of course , budget is around 10K$
Why the insistence on SCSI? Is there any reason that SATA or RAID with
SATA is not acceptable? Just curious.
Because I want it
I have yet to have a SATA drive last
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS, but SAS
costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
-Derek
At 10:46 AM 9/14/2006, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Frank Bonnet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerard Seibert wrote:
Frank Bonnet wrote:
[...]
I
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Derek Ragona wrote:
SATA is still quite limited. To go beyond those limits use SAS,
but SAS costs even more than SCSI and is brand new technology.
Get a 12 or 16 or 24 port Areca card and have a few hot spares and
you will see SATA fly for less money than
apps. Our current config
is running on a 6 year old Dell PowerEdge machine with SCSI RAID 5, 1
Ghz processor, 32 gig total disk capacity, and a gig of RAM. Upgrading
this machine would cost more than it's worth. Boss insists on a name
brand server (Dell, HP, Gateway, etc). Budget
, 1 Ghz
processor, 32 gig total disk capacity, and a gig of RAM. Upgrading this
machine would cost more than it's worth. Boss insists on a name brand
server (Dell, HP, Gateway, etc). Budget is in the $2K range. I'd rather
stay away from SATA at this point due to the incredible amount of
difficulty
is
running on a 6 year old Dell PowerEdge machine with SCSI RAID 5, 1 Ghz
processor, 32 gig total disk capacity, and a gig of RAM. Upgrading this
machine would cost more than it's worth. Boss insists on a name brand
server (Dell, HP, Gateway, etc). Budget is in the $2K range. I'd rather
stay
Bill Moran wrote:
Has anyone every verified whether or not SATA has the problems that plagued
ATA? Such as crappy quality and lying caches?
Personally, I still demand SCSI on production servers because it still
seems as if:
a) The performance is still better
b) The reliability is still
| Our mailhub is actually a HP DL360 with one processor (Xeon 2.8 ghz)
| with 2 Gb RAM and 120 Gb disks, it is 3 years old.
| It runs Postfix + imap + imaps + pop3 + pop3s + squirrelmail + vexira
| antivirus + postgrey
| and some small auxiliary services.
Your server is good enough to
Hello
I installed Samba 2 on a FreeBSD box running 5.4 Stable... now the problem is
this... I urgently need to upgrade this package but cannot seem to find a way
to do so... I didnt install it off the port... In istalled it using pkg_add...
it was in the CD that contains applications
On 9/4/06, Phares Kariuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I installed Samba 2 on a FreeBSD box running 5.4 Stable...
now the problem is this... I urgently need to upgrade this package
but cannot seem to find a way to do so... I didnt install it off the port...
In istalled it using pkg_add... it
Hello,
I've got mysql server and client v4.1 running on a FreeBSD6.x box. They
were installed via ports not packages using custom make options which i have
in portupgrade's pkgtools.conf file. I now would like to upgrade both of
them to v5, without causing dependency issues with installed
shlibs removed
from old ports in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg means the old 4.1
dependent stuff will still continue to work even after you've updated --
again, not that you should be planning to use mysql dependent
programs while upgrading, but having that capability is useful
Hi,
I have a machine which has BSD 4.8 on it. Is it possible to upgrade to
version 6.0 without affecting/deleting/losing any files currently
present on the machine.
$ uname -a
FreeBSD tcp-01-pc7 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #1: Fri Jul 18
10:43:30 PDT 2003
[EMAIL
configuration files then you may have to upgrade step by
step. Upgrading using the make buildworld, make build kernel, make install
kernel, reboot, make install world, mergemaster process is time comsuming. If
you only need to protect data, then copy it off and do a clean install.
Are you using
files then you may have to upgrade step by
step. Upgrading using the make buildworld, make build kernel,
make install kernel, reboot, make install world, mergemaster
process is time comsuming. If you only need to protect data, then
copy it off and do a clean install.
Optimal solution
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 14:29, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
I have a freebsd Generic System 6.0-RELEASE #0 compiled Thursday Nov 3 2005
originally on an Abit VA-20 motherboard equipped with an AMD sempron cpu in
its 462 socket.
The Abit motherboard died due to a chip failure and I did not
Hi
I have a freebsd Generic System 6.0-RELEASE #0 compiled Thursday Nov 3 2005
originally on an Abit VA-20 motherboard equipped with an AMD sempron cpu in its
462 socket.
The Abit motherboard died due to a chip failure and I did not feel like taking
a risk using of the same thing happening
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Southwell
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 3:29 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Upgrading a system to amd64
Hi
I have a freebsd Generic System 6.0-RELEASE #0 compiled
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 14:29, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
I have a freebsd Generic System 6.0-RELEASE #0 compiled Thursday Nov 3 2005
originally on an Abit VA-20 motherboard equipped with an AMD sempron cpu in
its 462 socket.
The Abit motherboard died due to a chip failure and I did not
When I type
/stand/sysinstall
and go through the screens I get hung up in the ftp process. It keeps
telling me that it hasn't been able to retrieve any packages, no matter
what ftp sites I try or how many times I try. I select the site, it asks
me if I'm multi-user and if the network is
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 03:51:55 -0400
beno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I type
/stand/sysinstall
and go through the screens I get hung up in the ftp process. It keeps
telling me that it hasn't been able to retrieve any packages, no
matter what ftp sites I try or how many times I try. I select
In response to beno [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When I type
/stand/sysinstall
and go through the screens I get hung up in the ftp process. It keeps
telling me that it hasn't been able to retrieve any packages, no matter
what ftp sites I try or how many times I try. I select the site, it asks
me
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:29:12 -0400
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ping -c 3 www.google.com
without the quotes. If you don't get an error, your network is
configured, in which case you should answer yes to this question.
I keep getting this message:
No
Henry Lenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Squeak version 3.8 is out, but ports have 3.6.
Does anyone know why?
Presumably because the maintainer hasn't had time to update it yet.
If you provide patches, that would probably help him get it faster...
___
Presumably because the maintainer hasn't had time to update it yet.
If you provide patches, that would probably help him get it faster...
Yes, I can infer that is one possibility. However, I was asking for
specifics. And specifically, I wasn't asking for a knee-jerk answer
with no real
I am having problem upgrading kdebase from 3.4 to 3.5 on FreeBSD-6.0-release.
I followed the instructions on /usr/ports/UPDATING
For convenience, I post the instructions here:
-
20060108:
AFFECTS: users of x11/kdelibs3, x11/kdebase3, deskutils
Hi --
Squeak version 3.8 is out, but ports have 3.6.
Does anyone know why?
TIA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I'm trying to update a box from 6.0-p6 or 7 can't remember for sure
which to 6.1-RELEASE. I've downloaded the source, done make buildworld, make
buildkernel with a generic kernel, make installkernel, rebooted, done
mergemaster -p then gone cd /usr/src and done make installworld, all
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Filippo Moretti wrote:
I run 6.1_STABLE on i386 arch and when I tried to upgrade mplayer I
get the following error
c++: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
Mostly likely, you've got hardware problems like bad memory or an
overheating CPU. Either run some system
Filippo Moretti wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Filippo Moretti wrote:
I run 6.1_STABLE on i386 arch and when I tried to upgrade mplayer I
get the following error
c++: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
Mostly likely, you've got hardware problems like bad memory or an
overheating CPU.
Frank Staals wrote:
Filippo Moretti wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Filippo Moretti wrote:
I run 6.1_STABLE on i386 arch and when I tried to upgrade mplayer I
get the following error
c++: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
Mostly likely, you've got hardware problems like bad memory or
Filippo Moretti skrev:
Frank Staals wrote:
Filippo Moretti wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Filippo Moretti wrote:
I run 6.1_STABLE on i386 arch and when I tried to upgrade mplayer I
get the following error
c++: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
Mostly likely, you've got hardware
I run 6.1_STABLE on i386 arch and when I tried to upgrade mplayer I get
the following error
c++: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
Filippo Moretti wrote:
I run 6.1_STABLE on i386 arch and when I tried to upgrade mplayer I get
the following error
c++: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1plus)
Mostly likely, you've got hardware problems like bad memory or an overheating
CPU. Either run some system diagonstics like
Warren Liddell wrote:
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE and the last week or more i have had
problems trying to upgrade this port .. below is the full work up of
trying to install
the package manually from the ports. Any assistance into whats happening
would be appreciated.
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE and the last week or more i have had problems
trying to upgrade this port .. below is the full work up fo trying to install
the package manually from the ports. Any assistance into whats happening
would be appreciated.
==
===
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE and the last week or more i have had problems
trying to upgrade this port .. below is the full work up of trying to install
the package manually from the ports. Any assistance into whats happening
would be appreciated.
==
exports/lib
Warren Liddell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE and the last week or more i have had problems
trying to upgrade this port .. below is the full work up of trying to install
the package manually from the ports. Any assistance into whats happening
would be appreciated.
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE and the last week or more i have had problems
trying to upgrade this port .. below is the full work up fo trying to install
the package manually from the ports. Any assistance into whats happening
would be appreciated.
==
===
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE and the last week or more i have had problems
trying to upgrade this port .. below is the full work up of trying to install
the package manually from the ports. Any assistance into whats happening
would be appreciated.
==
exports/lib
Hello, I am on FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE and was wondering if there is a way to
replace the system's GCC, shipped with 5.5, (GCC 3.4.2) to GCC 4.1 without
upgrading the whole source tree to another release? Is there a way to do this
that will not include much risk of breaking my system? Thanks
In the last episode (Jul 10), Jacob Jennings said:
Hello, I am on FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE and was wondering if there is a way
to replace the system's GCC, shipped with 5.5, (GCC 3.4.2) to GCC 4.1
without upgrading the whole source tree to another release? Is there
a way to do
On 7/10/06, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the last episode (Jul 10), Jacob Jennings said:
Hello, I am on FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE and was wondering if there is a way
to replace the system's GCC, shipped with 5.5, (GCC 3.4.2) to GCC 4.1
without upgrading the whole source tree to another
without upgrading the whole source tree to
another release? Is there
a way to do this that will not include much risk
of breaking my
system? Thanks.
You can install ports/lang/gcc41, which will give
you gcc41 and
g++41 executables.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL
I've already installed it, I should have mentioned that--sorry. What I mean is
there a way to where when I type 'gcc' or 'g++' it uses gcc41 or g++41? I
know I could use symlinks but that would entail removing the gcc 3.4.2
binaries which I'm afraid might be insecure.
I've already installed it, I should have mentioned
that--sorry. What I mean is
there a way to where when I type 'gcc' or 'g++' it uses gcc41
or g++41? I
know I could use symlinks but that would entail removing the
gcc 3.4.2
binaries which I'm afraid might be insecure.
i don't know
On Monday 10 July 2006 14:42, Warren Liddell wrote:
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE and the last week or more i have had problems
trying to upgrade this port .. below is the full work up fo trying to
install the package manually from the ports. Any assistance into whats
happening would be
Warren Liddell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
You should build `devel/apr-svn' with db4 support to use subversion with it.
Please rebuild `devel/apr-svn' with option `APR_UTIL_WITH_BERKELEY_DB=yes'
and
try again.
Or you can disable db4 support. Only 'fs'
im Running FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE
You should build `devel/apr-svn' with db4 support to use subversion with it.
Please rebuild `devel/apr-svn' with option `APR_UTIL_WITH_BERKELEY_DB=yes' and
try again.
Or you can disable db4 support. Only 'fs' repository backend will be
available.
To disable db4
901 - 1000 of 1952 matches
Mail list logo
