Re: Cvsup Handbook Example
On 21 Feb 2003 18:49:14 -0800 Justin Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello zerotransfer, I've always enjoyed religious debates, but the list probably tires of them, and if we keep this up, one of the list admins will probably tell us to 'take it outside'. But as a final followup, there are sacred numbers in every religion, as far as I know, and if we in the IT sector, which is very number heavy, paid attention to what superstition somebody may hold with a certain number, our jobs would become ever more complicated. In Japanese, the word shi (she) means 4 and death. This is the basis for the custom of never giving a gift of four things. Tea cup and sake cup sets always come with five cups, so that the giver does not wish death upon the recipient. I suppose that setting a file's permissions to -rw-r--r- (644) gets a laugh when thought of as read-write kill kill; reminds me of some USENET news group names. Except those prefered die-die, and in Japanese dai means big. Programmers often use certain patterns to indicate dummy data. I was taught to use nines for that. In the handbook, I might have used *default host=cvsup999.FreeBSD.org It does not take a leap of faith to presume that the author uses 666 where I would use 999, with no offense intended regardless of race, creed, or color. -- _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Gary Dunn _/ _/ Open Slate Project _/ _/ http://openslate.sourceforge.net/ _/ _/ http://www.aloha.com/~knowtree/_/ _/ Honolulu _/ _/ registered Linux user #273809 _/ _/ _/ _/ This tagline is umop apisdn. _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Mozilla taking awfully long time to work
Hello everybody... Ive got these 2 problems with mozilla (either 1.0.2 or 1.2.x and if i'm not mistaken older versions as well) Problem 1: Well, i use another pc to connect to the net, using dhclient. If i'm connecte and i run mozilla, it starts fine... Then i get disconnected, i quit mozilla, and if i'm to run it again i have to wait 3 to 4 minutes for it to run. I see my cpu-meter flashing for just a sec and then it starts using cpu again after 3 to 4 mins, which is when it finally starts the application.. Problem 2: I am connected on he internet just fine, (downloading ports, etc etc.) but when i try to make an http connection with mozilla, it hangs on the Resolving host... msg... Then, after 3-4 minutes again it decides to proceed on the Connecting.. and Sending request.. msgs... Any ideas?? __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
subscribe
subscribe _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Opera 6.11 on FreeBSD 5
This is happening because the Opera 6.11 installed from ports is still a binary (Opera will *NEVER* open source) To get this running, you will need compatibility options with 4.7. In kernel, you will need options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 and you will also need to have installed the compat4x libraries. Will On Saturday 22 February 2003 12:26, Wayne Pascoe wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to run opera on FreeBSD 5.0. I've installed from ports which installed version 6.11 When I run opera, I get the following output: $ opera Segmentation fault (core dumped) Doesn't matter if I run as a user or as root, the same thing happens. Does anyone have Opera working on FreeBSD 5 ? TIA, -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Opera 6.11 on FreeBSD 5
On Saturday 22 February 2003 13:44, you wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 01:25:20PM +0200, Willie Viljoen wrote: This is happening because the Opera 6.11 installed from ports is still a binary (Opera will *NEVER* open source) To get this running, you will need compatibility options with 4.7. In kernel, you will need options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 and you will also need to have installed the compat4x libraries. Baie Dankie! :) Seriously though, thanks... On the same topic, does the native FreeBSD version have a flash plugin available, or am I better off using the Linux compatible version ? If you wish to have an official implementation, you should use the Linux compatibility mode plugin. However, if you want an open source, cross-platform, native plugin, you can use the unofficial (not made by Macromedia) implementation, which can be installed automatically with portinstall flashplayer (make sure your ports are up to date) thanks again... No problem :) -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
dd problem
Hi Guys. Ok, I admit, most of my experience is on Solaris, but hey, I'd never expect such a command to fail on FreeBSD: # df -k Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 2064302 74140 1825018 4%/ /dev/ad0s1f 9247246 1895878 661159022%/usr /dev/ad0s1e 15483630 380750 13864190 3%/var procfs 4 40 100%/proc # # dd if=/dev/ad01sa of=/dev/ad2s1a bs=4096k dd: /dev/ad01sa: No such file or directory # What am I doing wrong? Feel like in the newbies time :/ Regs To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dd problem
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:06:10 +0100 (CET) Luca Pizzinato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy, # df -k Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 2064302 74140 1825018 4%/ /dev/ad0s1f 9247246 1895878 661159022%/usr /dev/ad0s1e 15483630 380750 13864190 3%/var procfs 4 40 100%/proc # # dd if=/dev/ad01sa of=/dev/ad2s1a bs=4096k dd: /dev/ad01sa: No such file or directory You probably meant `ad0s1a' instead of `ad01sa' ? Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk Of course it runs NetBSD! pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
PLS ignore - dd problem
it's if=/dev/ad0s1a and NOT /dev/ad01sa :/ PS: Thanks Miguel Hi Guys. Ok, I admit, most of my experience is on Solaris, but hey, I'd never expect such a command to fail on FreeBSD: # df -k Filesystem 1K-blocksUsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 2064302 74140 1825018 4%/ /dev/ad0s1f 9247246 1895878 661159022%/usr /dev/ad0s1e 15483630 380750 13864190 3%/var procfs 4 40 100%/proc # # dd if=/dev/ad01sa of=/dev/ad2s1a bs=4096k dd: /dev/ad01sa: No such file or directory # What am I doing wrong? Feel like in the newbies time :/ Regs To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: CVSUP of 4.7 only?
On 2003-02-22 01:26, Tuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RELENG_4_7 - More current than _RELEASE, but only with critical updates. What you describe, in slightly different words, is EXACTLY what the tag RELENG_4_7 is :-))) I thought it was 4.7 with **ONLY** security and **ONLY** critical updates, NOT anything else. That's exactly what it is. It is a security branch[3]. No new features are added to it. Not even manpage updates. The security branches *only* receive absolutely minimal changes to fix any problems related to security they might have. My impression was 4_7 was just those items, 4 was those plus other non-important and things to get us to the next level. No, that's RELENG_4. The security branches[3] like RELENG_4_7 *only* receive critical security related fixes. That's it. Nothing more. They are not the same as RELENG_4. So your telling me that if I CVSUP 4_7, I technically will get the same tree as 4 up until the day the uname banner changed to 4.8-PRERELEASE? Thats not my impression of what 4_7 is. I don't know what you mean by 4_7. In fact, before this turns out a very confusing thing for both of us, since you seem to mean different things by saying critical fixes than I do, please, if you still feel confused about tags their meaning and what the release process of FreeBSD is, refer to the following documents: [1] FreeBSD Release Engineering. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/article.html [2] The FreeBSD Handbook. Staying STABLE with FreeBSD. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html#STABLE [3] FreeBSD Security Advisories http://www.freebsd.org/security/#adv If, after reading these you still have questions about the meaning of every tag, then it's a bug in the documentation and we should do something about it :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
ssh(d) problems between FreebSD and Linux Systems
Hello, Behind my firewall I am trying to set up password-free ssh between the various systems. I have come across a curious problem. From a BSD machine I can set it up so that FreeBSD can ssh into any of the Linux machines is fine, but the other way around, trying to get into the FreeBSD machines from Linux, causes sshd on FreebSD to return Feb 22 13:46:57 willow sshd[926]: fatal: monitor_read: unsupported request: 24 This happens with 2 different varieties of Linux, so it is not an artefact of just one system. The configurations look the same at both ends as far as I can see. I have achieved this by generating an rsa key, and putting the public one into the authorized_keys2 file as appropriate. Any suggestions ? -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands [ This mail has been checked as virus-free ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: LAN and sound support in ASUS A7V333-X
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 12:21:10PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Mats Dufberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I run FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE on a ASUS A7V333-X motherboard. On the card there is both LAN and sound card built in, but neither is detected by FreeBSD. Does anyone have any information if it is possible to get that support? I'm not running 5.0, so I may not have the details exactly right, but I think they're similar to 4.x. You'll need to load the pcm module or compile it into your kernel. The ethernet card I'm not sure about, though; I don't know which driver is supposed to handle that one. I think you may not have much success with the Ethernet card, I didn't with both FreeBSD and Linux on a machine with the same motherboard. A search of the maker's site proved fruitless. I would love to know if it is possible though, since eventually said machine will need 2 NICS. I have not tried the sound, since the machine in question is not destined for music :) -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands [ This mail has been checked as virus-free ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: mdmfs /tmp and fstab on 5.0
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Matthias Buelow wrote: Hi folks, I usually mount /tmp on the swap via the following fstab entry: /dev/da0s1b /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,nosymfollow 0 0 only this doesn't work anymore on freebsd 5.0 since mount_mfs doesn't exist (seems to have been replaced by mdmfs). What's the proper way to accomplish the same thing on 5.0? I'd prefer a solution with fstab, so that /tmp gets mounted as early as possible. ln -s mdmfs /sbin/mount_mfs As I recall, mdmfs wasn't called mount_mfs at the time because the author wasn't prepared to fight the battle he assumed (probably correctly) would arise out of doing so. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Scrabble gematria: BIBLE = DOGMA To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
How to tell if Port is blocked...
I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked? TIA, Rod To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Rod Person wrote: I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked? Pick up the phone and ask them? -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ I'm the dandy information superhighwayman. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:15:13AM -0500, Rod Person wrote: I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked? If you have access from a machine outside your network, telnet to your home IP address on that port. Eg to test port 80 telnet my.ip.address.here 80 HTH -- Wayne Pascoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: ssh(d) problems between FreebSD and Linux Systems
On Saturday 22 February 2003 15:01, Cliff Sarginson wrote: Hello, Behind my firewall I am trying to set up password-free ssh between the various systems. I have come across a curious problem. From a BSD machine I can set it up so that FreeBSD can ssh into any of the Linux machines is fine, but the other way around, trying to get into the FreeBSD machines from Linux, causes sshd on FreebSD to return Feb 22 13:46:57 willow sshd[926]: fatal: monitor_read: unsupported request: 24 This happens with 2 different varieties of Linux, so it is not an artefact of just one system. The configurations look the same at both ends as far as I can see. I have achieved this by generating an rsa key, and putting the public one into the authorized_keys2 file as appropriate. Any suggestions ? Try and make sure that your Linux systems always use protocol version 2. FreeBSD uses this protocol by default, but most Linux distributions default to version 1 for compatibility reasons. Public key authentication only appeared in version 2, so machines trying to use version 1 will not be able to use it properly. The quickest way to achieve this is to force remote systems to use version 2 by adding this in /etc/ssh/sshd_config on the FreeBSD system (it should already be there for new versions): Protocol 2 Note that a setting of 2,1 will not work as it will still server protocol 1 if clients request it first. Will -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
introduction
Dear Sirs; We are manufactures and exporters company. Our firm is founded in 1963 which KAVUANLAR A.. as a food and agriculture farm store. We produce milking machines, automated cow watering systems and electric mills. We study and interest about all kinds of agricultural machines, milk storing or cooling tanks, water pumps, cream seperators, sprayer machine and fodder splitter. We would like to make our company and its products known to you. Our products are preffered inside and outside of company due their reliable,hygenic and user friendly structures. We are fully dedicated to keep a high quality service to our customers, with full spare parts quarant, and broad customer support services. Enclosing to send you, our catalogues which gives you general information about our products. If you are interesting, we'll be happy to send you any further information. We may be available in the near future to discuss, the subject with you as well as. You can visit our Web address. www.sanmak.net Thanking for your kind interest. We look forward to your reply, we remain. Yours faithfully KAVUANLAR A.. Zafer ALGUN Export Manager ADDRESS__: KAVUANLAR GIDA TARIM YEM SAN.TC.A.. Demirciler Cd.No:118 M.Kemalpaa/BURSA/TURKEY TELEPHONE__: 0090-224-6132523-6134533-6134303 FAX__: 0090-224-6137585 Web: www.sanmak.net E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Displaying Slideshow on Remote Computer
The only two problems I would have are 1) it would tie up two machines for this function and 2) the screen on the remote computer is not as clear as the local one. Thanks for the idea. ~Rik On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 07:53 AM, Matt Smith wrote: I would recommend running VNC, but opposite to what you seem to be thinking. Run the VNC client on the BSD box, and the server on the Windows Box. The PPT slide show could be delivered and controlled by PowerPoint on the Windows box, and the VNC client would display the Windows Desktop on the Kiosk. -Matt On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 18:43, Rik Scarborough wrote: I'll explain what I want to do, then what I planned and ask my question. That way if any of you have a better way to accomplish this, you can let me know. I need to display a Power Point slide on a FreeBSD computer running more or less like a Kiosk. The FreeBSD machine will be running in a foyer displaying the Slide show and playing mp3's. It will not have a keyboard attached and needs to be controlled (i.e. slides changed) from a Windows box in the office. Both machines will be on the network. Our plan is to use Open Office to show the slide show. I had planned to put XWindows on the Windows machine (using Cygwin) and export the display from the FreeBSD box, but then it dawned on me that I will not get the same display that is running the slide show. i.e. Open Office will be running on localhost:0.0, but the user will be looking at remotebox:0.0. As a side benefit, this will be a chance to put a BSD desktop in front of the users who overwhelming feel that they have to have Windows to do their job. Someone suggested VNC, but that does not appear to control the :0.0 display. I'm not sure how that is different from rlogin to the BSD box and exporting the display. Is there a way to either control Open Office from the command line, or grab Open Office, at least Impress, from localhost:0.0 long enough to open a new file and start the slide show, and then push it back? ~Rik -- It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. -- Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
disk crash
Hello! I've got a problem with my disk on FreeBSD. Few days ago I tried to mount a partition on /usr, but it told me that it's not clean and that I have to use fsck. So I tried, but then I saw this: THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and this: /dev/ad2s1f: NOT LABELED AS A BSD FILE SYSTEM (unused) Is there any help for that or do I have to say goodbye to some of my data? (please cc any answers to me, I'm not subscribed to this list) -- Wojtek Bauman, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://reaver.rockmetal.pl/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Displaying Slideshow on Remote Computer
I'm having trouble getting several errors when compiling x0rfbserver. Has anyone else gotten this to compile? ~Rik On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 05:46 PM, Rus Foster wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Rik Scarborough wrote: Someone suggested VNC, but that does not appear to control the :0.0 display. I'm not sure how that is different from rlogin to the BSD box and exporting the display. If you do want to control :0.0 on a remote machine www.hexonet.de/software/x0rfbserver/ which is basically a VNC server which can take :0.0 Rgds Rus -- http://www.65535.net | MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lifetime Linux or FreeBSD account: $100 || Lifetime Hosting: $150 Offsite Backups - Remote System Monitoring - Email Hosting To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- A wise man told me, A man's gotta do what a woman tells him he's gotta do. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: ssh(d) problems between FreebSD and Linux Systems
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 03:36:30PM +0200, Willie Viljoen wrote: On Saturday 22 February 2003 15:01, Cliff Sarginson wrote: Hello, Behind my firewall I am trying to set up password-free ssh between the various systems. I have come across a curious problem. From a BSD machine I can set it up so that FreeBSD can ssh into any of the Linux machines is fine, but the other way around, trying to get into the FreeBSD machines from Linux, causes sshd on FreebSD to return Feb 22 13:46:57 willow sshd[926]: fatal: monitor_read: unsupported request: 24 This happens with 2 different varieties of Linux, so it is not an artefact of just one system. The configurations look the same at both ends as far as I can see. I have achieved this by generating an rsa key, and putting the public one into the authorized_keys2 file as appropriate. Any suggestions ? Try and make sure that your Linux systems always use protocol version 2. FreeBSD uses this protocol by default, but most Linux distributions default to version 1 for compatibility reasons. Public key authentication only appeared in version 2, so machines trying to use version 1 will not be able to use it properly. The quickest way to achieve this is to force remote systems to use version 2 by adding this in /etc/ssh/sshd_config on the FreeBSD system (it should already be there for new versions): Protocol 2 Note that a setting of 2,1 will not work as it will still server protocol 1 if clients request it first. Ok, will give that a whirl later. Thanks ! -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands [ This mail has been checked as virus-free ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
X and radeon 9000 mobility
Hi, as i read somewhere in the inet i configured my x with a ati-card of my choise. than i open the XFree86-file an changed the 'Driver ati' line to 'Driver radeon' in the section Device. Here is the config-file: http://www.ahrlug.de/xfree_log_conf/XF86Config When i type 'startx' i get the error: 'No device detected' You can see the full output here: http://www.ahrlug.de/xfree_log_conf/XFree86.0.log Is there anything else i have to do? Or is something wrong in my config-file? Thank you in advance and sorry for my english ;) Regards cu To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
fbsd backup 2 remote
I want to make a *full* backup of my fbsd-4.7 to a (remote) HD on my local network. Should I share the (remote) directory through NFS or an alternate way. And most important: what program do I use. The remote is an ext3 linux drive. Can anyone point me in the right (syntax) direction? Should I use tar? Or what? In future I want to be able to do a full restore to a new (and much larger) harddrive ;-)) -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.7 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection
I'm installing 4.7 at home. The Intel box is behind a NAT running on a Win98 box with ZoneAlarm running. The point of installing 4.7 is so that I can replace the 98 box as my gateway to my Verizon DSL connection. My installation fails when the program tries to access one of the ftp servers. When the time-out occurs I get an installation media error message. I know that my subnet on the NAT works because when I plug a 2000 machine into the gateway I can access the Internet. However, I had to lower the Max MTU settings in the registry to do it. I understand that PPPoE requires a lower MTU setting, but I'm not sure how to set MTU in the installation program. Can anyone help me with the problem? Vaughan Moore To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: new bie (tar command)
Anil Garg disturbed my sleep to write: p.s. i looked earlier at -t, infact i was also trying to use -x with -t. Logical enough, but not correct. -t and -x are mutually exclusive. -t means just list the contents; -x means extract the contents (ie, get files out of the tarball). The tar command won't let you do both. Hope this helps, Hugh -- Saint Aardvark the Carpeted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because the plural of Anecdote is Myth. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Mozilla taking awfully long time to work
--- Peter Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanos Tsouanas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello everybody... Ive got these 2 problems with mozilla (either 1.0.2 or 1.2.x and if i'm not mistaken older versions as well) Problem 1: Well, i use another pc to connect to the net, using dhclient. If i'm connecte and i run mozilla, it starts fine... Then i get disconnected, i quit mozilla, and if i'm to run it again i have to wait 3 to 4 minutes for it to run. I see my cpu-meter flashing for just a sec and then it starts using cpu again after 3 to 4 mins, which is when it finally starts the application.. Problem 2: I am connected on he internet just fine, (downloading ports, etc etc.) but when i try to make an http connection with mozilla, it hangs on the Resolving host... msg... Then, after 3-4 minutes again it decides to proceed on the Connecting.. and Sending request.. msgs... Any ideas?? It should be the DNS problem. Check /etc/hosts. /etc/hosts contains only these lines: ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain And it has been this way since i can remember... (the mozilla prob is kinda new, though) Thanks anyway! __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
On 02/22/03 01:46 PM, Wayne Pascoe sat at the `puter and typed: On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:15:13AM -0500, Rod Person wrote: I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked? If you have access from a machine outside your network, telnet to your home IP address on that port. Eg to test port 80 telnet my.ip.address.here 80 I've run into this before, and this will tell you if that port is blocked, but not where. Try a traceroute on the port (see manpage, I don't remember if it's as simple as with telnet). Unfortunately, it still may not tell you how to fix the problem. If you're using a DSL or cable modem, the port may get blocked there, and may not be configurable. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Wilner's Observation: All conversations with a potato should be conducted in private. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection
On Saturday 22 February 2003 16:55, Vaughan Moore wrote: I'm installing 4.7 at home. The Intel box is behind a NAT running on a Win98 box with ZoneAlarm running. The point of installing 4.7 is so that I can replace the 98 box as my gateway to my Verizon DSL connection. My installation fails when the program tries to access one of the ftp servers. When the time-out occurs I get an installation media error message. I know that my subnet on the NAT works because when I plug a 2000 machine into the gateway I can access the Internet. However, I had to lower the Max MTU settings in the registry to do it. I understand that PPPoE requires a lower MTU setting, but I'm not sure how to set MTU in the installation program. Can anyone help me with the problem? Vaughan Moore I'm almost sure MTU is not the problem in this case, the Windows machine should be taking care of that. Try setting FTP into passive mode in the installer's options screen, or turning off passive mode if that's the default on your version. Windows 98 NATs are not famous for handling FTP properly. -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: 4.7 - 4.8 woes. kernel now panics on bootup with still using grody create_intr interface message
Fixed earlier today, cvsup again :) On Saturday 22 February 2003 18:21, Steve Horan wrote: Hi, I've just cvsup'd from 4.7-STABLE (built from Nov 15 2002 sources) to today's 4.8-STABLE sources (Feb 22 2003) The machine now refuses to boot. The panic message is: still using grody create_intr interface Any pointers would be greatly appreciated regards sjh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
On Saturday 22 February 2003 08:21 am, Louis LeBlanc wrote: On 02/22/03 01:46 PM, Wayne Pascoe sat at the `puter and typed: On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:15:13AM -0500, Rod Person wrote: I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked? If you have access from a machine outside your network, telnet to your home IP address on that port. Eg to test port 80 telnet my.ip.address.here 80 I've run into this before, and this will tell you if that port is blocked, but not where. Try a traceroute on the port (see manpage, I don't remember if it's as simple as with telnet). Unfortunately, it still may not tell you how to fix the problem. If you're using a DSL or cable modem, the port may get blocked there, and may not be configurable. Last time I looked, Verizon had a no-local sever clause in their Terms of Service. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Slow networking with sis0
Hi, I am using 4.7 release on a XP1900+ with ECS K7S5A which has a SiS 735 chipset. The onboard ethernet appears to be working but very slow. I can ping out. Telnet in works but it is hanged after a while and dropped eventaully. CVSup runs overnight still not done, but it does make progress. ifconfig tells me autoselect with 10baseT as current which is correct. The flag is 8843. Same slowness was not observed under Windows. Has anyone experienced the similar? Thanks for help. Bo Xiao _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: SoftUpdates on /
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-21 14:52:45 -0500: the reason that they disabled by default on / is almost certainly because the / is usually *small*, not large. thus spoke Terry Lambert in Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: : I believe the reason it's not on in sysinstall is that sysinstall : tries to mount things async on the initial install, so that doing : things like unpacking ports doesn't take forever. If it fails, you : can just restart, and having to do that a couple of times is still : faster than waiting for ordered metadata. : The technical reason that it doesn't do it is that the mount update : is not logically an unmount without destroying vnodes(inodes) in : core, with a remount with the new options. The main reason for : that is that the dependencies go all the way to the buffer cache, : and the backing vnode (e.g. the raw device) that's mounted does : not necessarily get its buffers flushed. Basically, you'd have to : put a little more work into the mount update code. : This was discussed a long time ago on -arch, when soft updates : first came into FreeBSD, and then again every 18 months or so, : ever after. See Kirk's postings on the subject, if you don't : want to take mine for it. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message.see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: SOLVED sendto in send_ip_raw Error When Using nmap v3.0
I don't understand the dynamics but since the server running nmap had an IP address listed in the scan range, any attempts to scan an IP address greater than the address of the server running nmap resulted in this error. I worked around this by excluding the server address from the list. HTH someone else someday. Drew - Original Message - From: Drew Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 6:23 PM I was trying to find web servers on my local network and used the following nmap command: blacksheep# nmap -v -sT -p 80 '192.168.1.*' Things started out well but then I get the following error: sendto in send_ip_raw: sendto(4, packet, 28, 0, 192.168.1.3, 16) = Can't assign requested address Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying Any ideas on what's going on? I'm trying to figure out what address I gave my wireless access point as it's administered via a web interface. Thanks, Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 08:43:33AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: On Saturday 22 February 2003 08:21 am, Louis LeBlanc wrote: On 02/22/03 01:46 PM, Wayne Pascoe sat at the `puter and typed: On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:15:13AM -0500, Rod Person wrote: I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked? If you have access from a machine outside your network, telnet to your home IP address on that port. Eg to test port 80 telnet my.ip.address.here 80 I've run into this before, and this will tell you if that port is blocked, but not where. Try a traceroute on the port (see manpage, I don't remember if it's as simple as with telnet). Unfortunately, it still may not tell you how to fix the problem. If you're using a DSL or cable modem, the port may get blocked there, and may not be configurable. Last time I looked, Verizon had a no-local sever clause in their Terms of Service. Traceroute is not really the tool you are after. You need an external port scan done using another Internet connection or by a friend, or someone you can trust will not use the results for nefarious means. There are sites that will do simple scans for you .. but of course is up to you whether you trust them ;). Actually I get scanned several times a day by dopeheads looking for open-ports on my system. It is a fact of Internet life, it is not rocket science. Probably everyone on this list, certainly if they have a (semi)permanent net connection gets scanned as well. If your ISP is blocking you..change your ISP. -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands [ This mail has been checked as virus-free ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: disk crash
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wojtek Bauman [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: Hello! I've got a problem with my disk on FreeBSD. Few days ago I tried to mount a partition on /usr, but it told me that it's not clean and that I have to use fsck. So I tried, but then I saw this: THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and this: /dev/ad2s1f: NOT LABELED AS A BSD FILE SYSTEM (unused) Is there any help for that or do I have to say goodbye to some of my data? Assuming that ad2s1f is /usr, I'd say you are up the creek with little left in the way of a paddle. Try fsck -b 32 and see if it can repair the drive. If it works, copy your data off without otherwise touching the drive. Other than that, I think your only hope is a data recovery service. (please cc any answers to me, I'm not subscribed to this list) That's SOP on this list. mike -- Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Slow networking with sis0
Bo Xiao wrote: I am using 4.7 release on a XP1900+ with ECS K7S5A which has a SiS 735 chipset. [ ...sis issues... ] One of the committers has merged a bunch of changes related to the sis0 chipset recently to -STABLE. Which version of the sis0 code do you have: 98-sec# ident /usr/src/sys/pci/if_sis.c /usr/src/sys/pci/if_sis.c: $FreeBSD: src/sys/pci/if_sis.c,v 1.13.4.23 2003/02/05 21:49:01 mbr Exp $ ...? Also, what does 'netstat -i' look like? -Chuck To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
On 02/22/03 06:19 PM, Cliff Sarginson sat at the `puter and typed: On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 08:43:33AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: SNIP Last time I looked, Verizon had a no-local sever clause in their Terms of Service. If I understand the terms I got correctly, they mean no commercial servers, and they've told me they don't block any ports anyway. Traceroute is not really the tool you are after. You need an external port scan done using another Internet connection or by a friend, or someone you can trust will not use the results for nefarious means. There are sites that will do simple scans for you .. but of course is up to you whether you trust them ;). Any such services you 'trust'? Of course I know that's a tough one to answer, but don't worry, I'll do whatever due diligence I can beforehand. Actually I get scanned several times a day by dopeheads looking for open-ports on my system. It is a fact of Internet life, it is not rocket science. Probably everyone on this list, certainly if they have a (semi)permanent net connection gets scanned as well. If your ISP is blocking you..change your ISP. Yeah, but ATT Broadband just changed hands again, and they still haven't turned on in my area. I don't know what their practices will be anyway, so I'll have to do some due diligence there too. Thanks Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ You may already be a loser. -- Form letter received by Rodney Dangerfield. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
(snip) I also don't user Verizon for an ISP because they don't permit local servers. Not true at all. i'm guessing you're talking about the inconvenient way some Cable/DSL ISPs block incoming connections on common server ports (25, 80)? Verizon DSL does not block port 25 in the NorthEast. Port 80 appears blocked (Bah!), but they claim they don't block any ports. I was told it could be the DSL modem (Westell Wirespeed A90-210015-D4), but as far as I can tell, it isn't configurable, and doesn't block ports anyway. Odd thing is that the port 80 trace stops at the modem. I've never been able to figure this out. I am also a Verizon DSL customer. They have given me a similar model of the wirespeed dsl access point. They gave me a Westell Inc A90-210015-04 and do not block any ports period. Next month, Comcast (formerly ATT Broadband (formerly MediaOne Broadband)) is supposed to turn on the digital upgrades in my area, so I'm probably going to switch over. Oh, and BTW, other than port 80, Verizon DSL/PPP works great with FreeBSD. They dont block 80 on my box, allthough that might be a config setting not set in my area. (snip) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Linux Mozilla 1.2 segfaults
Hi: I posted this in mozilla but didn't get any answer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Linux Mozilla 1.2 made from ports segfaults on my 47R system. Any suggestions? Thanks! - Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On 02/22/03 09:26 AM, Aaron Burke sat at the `puter and typed: (snip) Verizon DSL does not block port 25 in the NorthEast. Port 80 appears blocked (Bah!), but they claim they don't block any ports. I was told it could be the DSL modem (Westell Wirespeed A90-210015-D4), but as far as I can tell, it isn't configurable, and doesn't block ports anyway. Odd thing is that the port 80 trace stops at the modem. I've never been able to figure this out. I am also a Verizon DSL customer. They have given me a similar model of the wirespeed dsl access point. They gave me a Westell Inc A90-210015-04 and do not block any ports period. Upon closer inspection, it looks like I misread the -04. We have the same modem. I still can't figure out why port 80 is dead though. http://www.keyslapper.org/ has been unavailable for almost 6 months, except from inside my LAN. Next month, Comcast (formerly ATT Broadband (formerly MediaOne Broadband)) is supposed to turn on the digital upgrades in my area, so I'm probably going to switch over. Oh, and BTW, other than port 80, Verizon DSL/PPP works great with FreeBSD. They dont block 80 on my box, allthough that might be a config setting not set in my area. Hmm. I'm thoroughly confused about this. I've really been wanting to get my webserver back up, but I've no idea how to find out where the problem lies. Even if I open the firewall, port 80 is still unavailable. The firewall hasn't changed much since I moved, anyway. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Herth's Law: He who turns the other cheek too far gets it in the neck. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
Hi, Traceroute is not really the tool you are after. You need an external port scan done using another Internet connection or by a friend, or someone you can trust will not use the results for nefarious means. There are sites that will do simple scans for you .. but of course is up to you whether you trust them ;). The thing is, sites like grc.com won't tell you what they are scanning, so I was led to believe that my firewall/NAT box was locked down tight - but when I used nmap to scan my external interface, the result comes out as 'filtered'. I've been told that this is because my ISP (Blueyonder, in the UK) performs a barrier service, protecting me from scanners (apart from BY's own ;-). Whether a talented individual could get around this is a bit beyond me, but I don't doubt it. Any such services you 'trust'? Nmap!! Actually I get scanned several times a day by dopeheads looking for open-ports on my system. It is a fact of Internet life, it is not rocket science. True. Regards, Andrew *** This email is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you have received this email in error, you are in notice of its status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person: to do so could be a breach of confidence. Thank you for your co-operation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of The RTL Group or its associated companies. Please contact our IT Helpdesk on +44 (0)20 7691 6996 or e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you require further assistance. *** To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: fbsd backup 2 remote
On 22 Feb Matthew Seaman wrote: # dump -0f - /usr | ssh linuxbox cat /foo/fbsd-usr.dump or # cd /home ; tar -jcvlf - . | ssh linuxbox cat /foo/fbsd-home.tar.bz2 Doing the restore is much the same thing in reverse: # cd /usr ; ssh linuxbox cat /foo/fbsd-usr.dump | restore -rf - or # cd /home ; ssh linuxbox cat /foo/fbsd-home.tar.bz2 | tar -jxpvf - Many thanks for your answer. It covers all ;-)) -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.7 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Elaboração de cartas comerciais
COMUNICADO IMPORTANTE!! Estamos lançando o KIT DE CARTAS COMERCIAIS, que sana suas dúvidas na elaboração de: agradecimentos, atestados e declarações, avisos, cartas de cobrança, cartas em inglês, comunicados, convites, contratos, propostas, empregos, solicitações e pedidos, telegramas, cartas por e-mail, etc. Composto de 02 (dois) disquetes com 150 modelos de documentos cada um, mais livreto 20 páginas, com técnicas de redação comercial. Indicado para: secretárias em geral, gerências, Rh, executivos, estudantes e empresas de toda ordem. Este kit possui um preço ínfimo em relação ao que poderá gerar no aperfeiçoamento da comunicação de sua empresa. Acesse nossa Home Page para mais detalhes: http://www.redacaodecartas.ihp.com.br Ps: Caso não queira receber novas mensagens e novidades sobre esse assunto, acesse: http://www.remova-me.ihp.com.br To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
I'm running FreeBSD 5.0, I think that my isp have recently block ports on me. I know the block port 82. But is there a way I can test to see if other ports are blocked? # cd /usr/ports/security/nmap # make make install make clean # man (8) nmap Best if you can run it on a machine foreign to your ISP network. Steve TIA, Rod To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
bind with IPV6 reverse problem
Hello,
I'm trying to make resolving for my IPV6 home network
but the reverse seems to not be working.
The config looks pretty fine but still nothing
So I noticed that bind is not listening on any IPV6 address
Is this the problem ?
here are
named.conf:
listen {
any;
};
listen-on-v6 {
any;
};
options {
directory /etc/namedb;
};
zone . {
type hint;
file named.root;
};
zone 0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA {
type master;
file localhost.rev;
};
zone 8.0.0.0.c.9.f.0.e.e.0.8.e.f.f.3.IP6.INT {
type master;
file m/amour.ipv6.nux.at.rev;
};
zone amour.ipv6.nux.at {
type master;
file m/amour.ipv6.nux.at;
};
m/amour.ipv6.nux.at.rev:
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 86400
8.0.0.0.c.9.f.0.e.e.0.8.e.f.f.3.IP6.INT IN SOA
ns1.amour.ipv6.nux.at. root.amour.ipv6.nux.at. (
2003022201
3600
900
2419200
86500
)
NS ns1.amour.ipv6.nux.at.
NS ns2.amour.ipv6.nux.at.
$ORIGIN 8.0.0.0.c.9.f.0.e.e.0.8.e.f.f.3.IP6.INT.
$ORIGIN
0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.0.0.0.c.9.f.0.e.e.0.8.e.f.f.3.IP6.INT.
1 PTR ns2.amour.ipv6.nux.at.
2 PTR ns1.amour.ipv6.nux.at.
$ORIGIN 8.0.0.0.c.9.f.0.e.e.0.8.e.f.f.3.IP6.INT.
e.b.a.b.e.f.a.c.f.e.e.b.d.e.a.d PTR amour.amour.ipv6.nux.at.
m/amour.ipv6.nux.at:
$ORIGIN .
$TTL 86400
amour.ipv6.nux.at IN SOA ns1.amour.ipv6.nux.at.
root.amour.ipv6.nux.at (
2003022201
3600
900
2419200
86500
)
IN NS ns1.amour.ipv6.nux.at.
$ORIGIN amour.ipv6.nux.at.
ns1 IN 3ffe:80ee:f9c:8::2
ns2 IN 3ffe:80ee:f9c:8::1
ns2 IN A 80.110.66.138
amour IN 3ffe:80ee:f9c:8:dead:beef:cafe:babe
--- END ---
thanks
P.S. Please include my mail when responding
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: How to tell if Port is blocked...
On 02/22/03 05:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sat at the `puter and typed: Hi, Traceroute is not really the tool you are after. You need an external port scan done using another Internet connection or by a friend, or someone you can trust will not use the results for nefarious means. There are sites that will do simple scans for you .. but of course is up to you whether you trust them ;). The thing is, sites like grc.com won't tell you what they are scanning, so I was led to believe that my firewall/NAT box was locked down tight - but when I used nmap to scan my external interface, the result comes out as 'filtered'. I've been told that this is because my ISP (Blueyonder, in the UK) performs a barrier service, protecting me from scanners (apart from BY's own ;-). Whether a talented individual could get around this is a bit beyond me, but I don't doubt it. Mine is filtered too. Bah. L -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl. -- Dave Barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 01:40:47PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote: On 02/22/03 07:03 PM, Cliff Sarginson sat at the `puter and typed: Hi, Well I can telnet to port 80 on your domain, but it times out in a browser. I don't get any greeting on the telnet, so...it's open, but nothing is responding to it .. (no web server I mean). Thanks for trying. I've done this myself in the past, and it never works. I even eliminated the virtual hosts and all the creative stuff, and nothing changed. Frustrating huh ? I would be tempted to momentarily lift any firewall you have, to make sure something has not got twisted up in the rules, or changes made to the O/S or get something else listening on port 80, netcat or something like that (I think it goes under the name nc in FreeBSD). Put your web-server on another port 8080, for example. Is it a proxy problem ? I guess you have run through all these possibilities... Well, good luck..you can always ask me if there is no external tester to hand, I work at home mostly, so it's no sweat to me..on a fixed price 24/7 ADSL link..so no expenses involved :) -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands [ This mail has been checked as virus-free ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: from GNOME to KDE
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:42:47PM -0500, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: Oh, well, what I did was get out of my X entirely to console mode, then pkg_delete 'qt*' 'kde*' and then build it from ports. This worked great, and my experience trying to do that sort of thing piecemeal has not been good. Alternatively you could set an alternate prefix for the new QT and then try to get KDE to use the alternate prefix as its load library location but my record trying that sort of thing has not been good. I chose the pkg_delete -f method, then upgraded my hand. Overnight. Still need to have the portupgrade util check things, but it looks like KDE3 is ready. You're right: piecemeal is the worst way... . gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On 02/22/03 09:26 AM, Aaron Burke sat at the `puter and typed: (snip) They dont block 80 on my box, allthough that might be a config setting not set in my area. Ok, mind if I ask you what your network setup looks like? Mine looks like this: xl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=3rxcsum,txcsum inet6 fe80::2c0:4fff:fe40:d9a%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 ether 00:c0:4f:40:0d:9a media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active ppp0: flags=8010POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST mtu 552 faith0: flags=8002BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 tun0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 1492 inet6 fe80::2a0:c9ff:fe74:12a3%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8 inet 68.160.158.62 -- 10.9.76.1 netmask 0xff00 Opened by PID 56 I think these are the relevant interfaces. I'm not entirely sure if this isn't just a masking problem. Of course that would mean that no network connection would get through, wouldn't it? My system at work had a bad netmask, and any machine outside my subnet had trouble connecting to the webserver there until I fixed it. My /etc/ppp/ppp.conf contains the following: verizon: set server /var/run/internet Hidden set device PPPoE:xl0 set mru 1492 set mtu 1492 set authname hidden set authkey hidden set log Phase set dial set login set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 enable lqr add default HISADDR disable iface-alias iface clear It is possible that some change to my set ifaddr line could help, but I don't know what it should be. Then again, that could be the only right one there. Any pointers? - maybe this will help the originator of this thread as well :) TIA Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ When the weight of the paperwork equals the weight of the plane, the plane will fly. -- Donald Douglas To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
[no subject]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On Friday 21 February 2003 12:11 pm, chuck odonnell wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:31:15AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: I also don't user Verizon for an ISP because they don't permit local servers. i'm guessing you're talking about the inconvenient way some Cable/DSL ISPs block incoming connections on common server ports (25, 80)? Actually, it is a clause for termination on most networks that cover homes. When Code Red hit, I was told by my old ISP that I was in violation of their TOS. I was seeing x,000 hits a day and when it got that high, they noticed. When several of the search engines start indexing my system at the same time, the hit count also goes up. The old ISP also told me that I could run a casual web server when I signed up. Their TOS says you have to have it in writing, which I didn't. When the hit count reached some rate, I appeared to have crossed their magic barrier separating casual-personal and business oriented. Verizon locally doesn't use a ppp based setup. My local ISP provides two static IPs and up to 20 via dhcp. When my DSL line doesn't work, I call Verizon's 888...1234 # and they work with me while I am on the telephone, which has been typically 2-4 am. If they can't fix it that way, Verizon tells me it will be fixed by 7 pm that day and a repairman shows up. The people on the East side of the Columbia River have Qwest and in the past, they had the reputation of taking days on simple repairs. I don't have any idea how they deal with repairs at this point because the computer oriented people that I knew have all moved out of the area. The only person left doesn't know how to get into his bios. When he gets back from 3-weeks in México, we are going to work on that :). I think that is similar to not letting one of the kids drive alone until they can prove they can change a flat tire. usually this is only a real annoyance because you can't set up a mail server for your incoming SMTP email. if you have access to an outside Internet server, and you run postfix on it -- you can route incoming mail through the outside server, and using the postfix transport table forward the mail to a sendmail or postfix instance running on a high port on your internal server. works great! I use kmail on kde-3. My ISP is Linux based and is running SpamAssasin. I can use it and not have to figure out how to make everything run. It all depends on the irritation factor. When it reaches some point, I will do what you are doing. ...or like you said, just don't use that ISP :) That is always a choice. It appears I have missed a number of comments on this because I wasn't cc'ed. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On 02/22/03 09:26 AM, Aaron Burke sat at the `puter and typed: (snip) They dont block 80 on my box, allthough that might be a config setting not set in my area. Ok, mind if I ask you what your network setup looks like? rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 00:e0:29:51:8b:62 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active ed0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 inet 4.x.y.z netmask 0xfc00 broadcast 4.40.155.255 ether 00:80:c8:3d:bc:ec (snip) Any pointers? - maybe this will help the originator of this thread as well :) I dont use PPPoE on this interface, as far as my machine is concerned, the internet is just an other chunk of the lan. I also nmap'd your ip address, the isp is stopping the traffic on ports 80, 113, and 27374 for you. You could try getting in touch with them about removing these rules for your ip address. Also keep in mind that some Cable Modem ISPs have similar rules in place. TIA Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ When the weight of the paperwork equals the weight of the plane, the plane will fly. -- Donald Douglas To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On 02/22/03 07:03 PM, Cliff Sarginson sat at the `puter and typed: Hi, Well I can telnet to port 80 on your domain, but it times out in a browser. I don't get any greeting on the telnet, so...it's open, but nothing is responding to it .. (no web server I mean). nmap on his IP address says otherwise. (notice closed not filtered) Interesting ports on pool-68-160-158-62.bos.east.verizon.net (68.160.158.62): (The 1547 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered) Port State Service 21/tcp openftp 22/tcp openssh 25/tcp opensmtp 80/tcp closed http 113/tcpclosed auth 143/tcpopenimap2 443/tcpopenhttps 993/tcpopenimaps 27374/tcp closed subseven Notice that they are closed, a local firewall makes the ports say filtered if they are turned off with a local firewall. (SNIP) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On 02/22/03 08:19 PM, Cliff Sarginson sat at the `puter and typed:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 01:40:47PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 02/22/03 07:03 PM, Cliff Sarginson sat at the `puter and typed:
Hi,
Well I can telnet to port 80 on your domain, but it times out in a
browser.
I don't get any greeting on the telnet, so...it's open, but nothing is
responding to it .. (no web server I mean).
Thanks for trying. I've done this myself in the past, and it never
works.
I even eliminated the virtual hosts and all the creative stuff, and
nothing changed.
Frustrating huh ?
Oh, yeah.
I would be tempted to momentarily lift any firewall you have, to make
sure something has not got twisted up in the rules, or changes made to
the O/S or get something else listening on port 80,
The moment I lifted the firewall, all my connections to the external
system died. I should try remembering this, since I do something
similar every now and again. Unfortunately, when I kill the firewall
rules, I have no NAT translation to get a VPN connection back from my Windoze
box to the system at work. Bah.
I did notice one interesting thing. When I reconfigured Apache to
listen on port 8080, it worked fine. What I only just realized, is
that I never put a rule in the firewall to explicitly open port 8080.
The rule used for port 80 is as follows:
${fwcmd} add pass tcp from any to any 80 setup
netcat or something like that (I think it goes under the name nc in
FreeBSD). Put your web-server on another port 8080, for example. Is it a
proxy problem ? I guess you have run through all these possibilities...
Well, good luck..you can always ask me if there is no external tester to
hand, I work at home mostly, so it's no sweat to me..on a fixed price
24/7 ADSL link..so no expenses involved :)
Thanks. I appreciate that. I'll read a couple more things and see
what happens, but I'm getting pretty close to my tolerance for now.
It was suggested that port 80 really is being blocked by the ISP, but
who knows. They say they don't do it. I'm not inclined to wait on
the phone for an hour to argue with them over it right now, either.
When Comcast finally starts calling to sell broadband in this area,
I'll be sure to pound on them about this.
Lou
--
Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :)
http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ
system-independent, adj.:
Works equally poorly on all systems.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Using mount... (newbie-ness)
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 04:30:14PM -, Chris Phillips wrote: Hi, I have read man mount googled lots but I am at a loss as how to mount the 2 partitions on my 2nd hard disk. I've created 2 new partitions on it: /dev/ad1s1b (swap) and /dev/ad1s1e /data (ufs) Ideally, I'd like to mount both the swap the /data partition, then use mount -p to give me the correct format of the required /etc/fstab entries... I am stumbling at the first step unfortunately :-( aphrodite# uname -a FreeBSD aphrodite.furrie.net 4.8-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Feb 20 23:27:51 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APHRODITE i386 aphrodite# dmesg (somewhat snipped) ad0: 19092MB WDC WD200EB-00BHF0 [38792/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad1: 114473MB WDC WD1200BB-00CAA1 [232581/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a aphrodite# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data mount: /dev/ad1s1e on /data: incorrect super block Can somebody please give me a clue? Many thanks! Chris Phillips Did you newfs /dev/ad1s1e? Josh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Using icc to compile kernel
I am running a dual processor P4 system, and I think compiling with icc might help out my performance. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Matt Hartzell Chief Technical Officer Digital Technology Surveillance [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1444 E. Bradford Parkway Springfield, Missouri 65804 417-886-9544 main 417-886-9546 fax 888-886-9555 toll-free WWW.GETDTS.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On 02/22/03 11:58 AM, Aaron Burke sat at the `puter and typed: On 02/22/03 07:03 PM, Cliff Sarginson sat at the `puter and typed: Hi, Well I can telnet to port 80 on your domain, but it times out in a browser. I don't get any greeting on the telnet, so...it's open, but nothing is responding to it .. (no web server I mean). nmap on his IP address says otherwise. (notice closed not filtered) Interesting ports on pool-68-160-158-62.bos.east.verizon.net (68.160.158.62): (The 1547 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered) Port State Service 21/tcp openftp 22/tcp openssh 25/tcp opensmtp 80/tcp closed http 113/tcpclosed auth 143/tcpopenimap2 443/tcpopenhttps 993/tcpopenimaps 27374/tcp closed subseven Notice that they are closed, a local firewall makes the ports say filtered if they are turned off with a local firewall. (SNIP) I am resetting ports 113 and 27374 from my firewall, but not port 80. From my work system, port 80 is shown as filtered by nmap. Other than that, everything above looks exactly right. Is it possible that port 80 is being reset elsewhere? What command line did you use? I used this: nmap -sT -P0 -O -v -oN ~/scan.txt -p 80 68.160.158.62 And got this: Port State Service 80/tcp filteredhttp Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Peter's Principle of Success: Get up one time more than you're knocked down. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Root mount failure w/ Maxtor ATA-100 card
I'm trying to boot a Dell Optiplex GX1 (440BX PIIX4e, P2-333) using a Maxtor (i.e., Promise) Ultra ATA-100 controller (BIOS rev 2.01.0.43) and a Western Digital WD600BB hard drive. The system works fine without the Promise controller, and the controller shows up in dmesg: atapci1: Promise ATA100 controller port 0xdc40-0xdc7f,0xdcb8-0xdcbb,0xdcc0-0xdcc7,0xdcd0-0xdcd3,0xdcd8-0xdcdf mem 0xff00-0xff01 irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 ata2: at 0xdcd8 on atapci1 ata3: at 0xdcc0 on atapci1 The HD in question (and the CDRW): ad0: 57241MB WDC WD600BB-00CAA1 [116301/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 acd0: CD-RW QPS CD-R PX-W8432T at ata1-master PIO4 No other ATA devices are in the system. When the WD600 is moved to the Promise, it shows up just fine as ad4 (and disk1 in loader), but the kernel raises error 6 (ENXIO?) when trying to mount ufs:/dev/ad4s1a. (Also, setting root_disk_unit to 4 does nothing; the kernel tries to mount ad0s1a regardless, and I have to type in the correct(?) device manually.) What else should I be trying to get this working? -- Brad Ackerman N1MNB Hollywood in general is terrified [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28 42 17 Nof the notion of ideas. PGP: 0x62D6B22381 23 28 W-- Samuel R. Delany, NYT 2001/7/8 pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fbsd backup 2 remote
On 22 Feb Matthew Seaman wrote: # dump -0f - /usr | ssh linuxbox cat /foo/fbsd-usr.dump It seemed easy enough, but it wasn't. ssh linuxbox won't work because I need a password. Guess I have to alter things to have an automatic ssh session. Don't exactly know how :-(( -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.7 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Using mount... (newbie-ness)
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 04:30:14PM -, Chris Phillips wrote: Hi, I have read man mount googled lots but I am at a loss as how to mount the 2 partitions on my 2nd hard disk. I've created 2 new partitions on it: /dev/ad1s1b (swap) and /dev/ad1s1e /data (ufs) Ideally, I'd like to mount both the swap the /data partition, then use mount -p to give me the correct format of the required /etc/fstab entries... I am stumbling at the first step unfortunately :-( aphrodite# uname -a FreeBSD aphrodite.furrie.net 4.8-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Feb 20 23:27:51 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APHRODITE i386 aphrodite# dmesg (somewhat snipped) ad0: 19092MB WDC WD200EB-00BHF0 [38792/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad1: 114473MB WDC WD1200BB-00CAA1 [232581/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a aphrodite# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data mount: /dev/ad1s1e on /data: incorrect super block Right. First of all, swap partitions aren't mounted as such. You just have to tell the system to start swapping onto the partition: # swapon /dev/ad1s1b To make that happen automatically on reboots, add a line like so to /etc/fstab: /dev/ad1s1b none swap sw 0 0 In order to mount your /data partition, either you need to tell the mount command all the parameters it needs: # mount -t ufs -o rw /dev/ad1s1e /data or you need to enter the equivalent data into /fstab so that mount can look up what it needs to know there. There are some other fields in fstab that 'mount -p' will give default values, but that you'll probably want to set to something useful. Try something like this in fstab: /dev/ad1s1e /data ufs rw 2 2 Oh, and do make sure you've created a filesystem on the partition before you try and mount it.. # newfs /dev/ad1s1e Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
On 02/22/03 03:27 PM, Louis LeBlanc sat at the `puter and typed:
SNIP
I did notice one interesting thing. When I reconfigured Apache to
listen on port 8080, it worked fine. What I only just realized, is
that I never put a rule in the firewall to explicitly open port 8080.
This was because of a firewall rule that should have opened every port
to the machine in particular. When that rule was commented out, the
firewall looked like this:
For OSScan assuming that port 21 is open and port 113 is closed and
neither are firewalled
Interesting ports on pool-68-160-158-62.bos.east.verizon.net
(68.160.158.62):
(The 1592 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered)
Port State Service
21/tcp openftp
22/tcp openssh
25/tcp opensmtp
113/tcpclosed auth
143/tcpopenimap2
443/tcpopenhttps
993/tcpopenimaps
8080/tcp openhttp-proxy
27374/tcp closed subseven
This is more like what I want it to look like, but port 80 still seems
to be filtered. But what the heck is filtered? I don't explicitly
block any ports until the last line of the firewall script:
${fwcmd} add 65000 deny ip from any to any in via ${oif}
So if I change deny to reset, will that give me an idea what ports are
filtered by me and what is filtered by the ISP?
Lou
--
Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :)
http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ
Finagle's Eleventh Law:
No matter what occurs, someone believes it happened according to
his pet theory.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: fbsd backup 2 remote
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 10:03:43PM +0100, dick hoogendijk wrote: On 22 Feb Matthew Seaman wrote: # dump -0f - /usr | ssh linuxbox cat /foo/fbsd-usr.dump It seemed easy enough, but it wasn't. ssh linuxbox won't work because I need a password. Guess I have to alter things to have an automatic ssh session. Don't exactly know how :-(( Hmmm... Usually you can just type in the password and everything proceeds as planned. However, knowing how to use key based auth with ssh is handy so here's a potted summary. Generate an ssh key in the usual way: # ssh-keygen -b 1024 -t rsa which will prompt you for a passphrase. Enter one. The command will create two files: id_rsa (the private key) and id_rsa.pub (the public key) Move 'id_rsa' in /root/.ssh and make sure it has the right ownership and fairly restrictive access permissions: # mv id_rsa /root/.ssh/ # chmod 0600 /root/.ssh/id_rsa # chown root:wheel /root/.ssh/id_rsa Now copy the public key over to the linux box and add it to root's[*] authourised keys file: # scp id_rsa.pub linuxbox:/root/.ssh/ # slogin linuxbox bash# cd /root/.ssh bash# cat id_rsa.pub authorized_keys Logout of the linux box. Start up the ssh-agent and load the key into it: # eval `ssh-agent` # ssh-add /root/.ssh/id_rsa You'll be prompted for the passphrase. Enter it. Now test that you can access the linux box using the key based authorization: # ssh -v linuxbox --- you should see something like this in the output debug1: next auth method to try is publickey debug1: userauth_pubkey_agent: testing agent key /root/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: input_userauth_pk_ok: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 149 lastkey 0x87654321 hint -1 debug1: ssh-userauth2 successful: method publickey You might need to take a few goes at this, and try connecting from the linux box to the FreeBSD machine so that each host gets the other's host key into the /root/.ssh/known_hosts files. Eventually you should end up logged in without having to give the password again. You should now be able to do your backups. When you're done, remember to shut down the ssh-agent: # eval `ssh-agent -k` Cheers, Matthew [*] Actually, it's probably better to use some other UID than root on the linux box. -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: mdmfs /tmp and fstab on 5.0
Jan Grant writes: ln -s mdmfs /sbin/mount_mfs Yes, that's a workaround I had in mind. As I recall, mdmfs wasn't called mount_mfs at the time because the author wasn't prepared to fight the battle he assumed (probably correctly) would arise out of doing so. I can't see any problem there, if the mdmfs program is compatible with mount_mfs. I mean, the manpage even explicitly says, the mdmfs utility is designed to be a work-alike and look-alike of the deprecated mount_mfs(8). Why then the different name, especially with the result that it can no longer be used with fstab? I mean, the old mount_mfs doesn't seem to exist anymore so there would be no naming conflict. -- Matthias Buelow To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Using icc to compile kernel
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 02:31:08PM -0600, Matt Hartzell wrote: I am running a dual processor P4 system, and I think compiling with icc might help out my performance. Can anyone point me in the right direction? I don't think it can be done (requires code changes). Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection
Thanks so much for the suggestion. When I use passive mode I get an error message Could not open ftp connection to ftp3.freebsd.org. Service not available, closing control connection. When I hit OK another error message comes up unable to initialize selected media. Would you like to adjust you media configuration and try again? When I do that, I go through the network configuration process again, but I get an immediate error message Cannot resolve host name ftp3.freebsd.org! Are you sure that your name server, gateway and network interface are correctly configured? I'm using DHCP, and it is pulling the correct IP's for these. Here's the log in my Winroute NAT. What do you think I'm doing wrong? Vaughan Interface Table: Interface Status Medium IP address NAT Index NETGEAR FA310TX Fast Ethe... UpEthernet10.10.1.1 50331652 NETGEAR FA311 Fast Ethern... UpEthernet10.10.1.0 67108869 Dial in adapter DownRAS 0.0.0.0 0 line1 Up RAS 151.200.238.11 on 16777218 dhcp TCP/IP stack's Routing Table: Net MaskGateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 line1 1 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 NETGEAR FA310TX Fast Ethe... 2 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 NETGEAR FA311 Fast Ethern... 2 151.200.0.0 255.255.0.0line1 1 DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1024 - 10.10.1.1:53 for ftp3.freebsd.org dns: query from 10.10.1.210:1024 id 41361 dns: question: A, ftp3.freebsd.org dns: reply: ftp3.freebsd.org has 198.82.184.28 DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1025 - 10.10.1.1:53 for ftp3.freebsd.org dns: query from 10.10.1.210:1025 id 41362 dns: question: A, ftp3.freebsd.org dns: reply: ftp3.freebsd.org has 198.82.184.28 TCP: packet 1278, length 74, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: SYN , seq:4161382813 ack:0 TCP: packet 1282, length 74, 151.200.238.11:45050 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: SYN , seq:4161382813 ack:0 - Snip - Repeats 8 times and drops down to a length of 60 after try number 3 DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45051 - 199.45.32.43:53 for 9.136.168.217.in-addr.arpa DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45052 - 199.45.32.38:53 for 9.136.168.217.in-addr.arpa TCP: packet 1323, length 74, 198.82.184.28:21 - 151.200.238.11:45050, flags: SYN ACK , seq:77305705 ack:4161382814 TCP: packet 1327, length 74, 198.82.184.28:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: SYN ACK , seq:77305705 ack:4161382814 TCP: packet 1328, length 60, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: RST , seq:4161382814 ack:0 This is where the install program quit and asked if I wanted to retry. -Original Message- From: Willie Viljoen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willie Viljoen Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:26 AM To: Vaughan Moore Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection On Saturday 22 February 2003 16:55, Vaughan Moore wrote: I'm installing 4.7 at home. The Intel box is behind a NAT running on a Win98 box with ZoneAlarm running. The point of installing 4.7 is so that I can replace the 98 box as my gateway to my Verizon DSL connection. My installation fails when the program tries to access one of the ftp servers. When the time-out occurs I get an installation media error message. I know that my subnet on the NAT works because when I plug a 2000 machine into the gateway I can access the Internet. However, I had to lower the Max MTU settings in the registry to do it. I understand that PPPoE requires a lower MTU setting, but I'm not sure how to set MTU in the installation program. Can anyone help me with the problem? Vaughan Moore I'm almost sure MTU is not the problem in this case, the Windows machine should be taking care of that. Try setting FTP into passive mode in the installer's options screen, or turning off passive mode if that's the default on your version. Windows 98 NATs are not famous for handling FTP properly. -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection
You're one step closer. When doing network configuration, make sure you list a valid and real DNS server. Try setting it up to use the DNS at your ISP, or the winroute if it provides DNS. On Sunday 23 February 2003 0:08, Vaughan Moore wrote: Thanks so much for the suggestion. When I use passive mode I get an error message Could not open ftp connection to ftp3.freebsd.org. Service not available, closing control connection. When I hit OK another error message comes up unable to initialize selected media. Would you like to adjust you media configuration and try again? When I do that, I go through the network configuration process again, but I get an immediate error message Cannot resolve host name ftp3.freebsd.org! Are you sure that your name server, gateway and network interface are correctly configured? I'm using DHCP, and it is pulling the correct IP's for these. Here's the log in my Winroute NAT. What do you think I'm doing wrong? Vaughan Interface Table: Interface Status Medium IP address NAT Index NETGEAR FA310TX Fast Ethe... Up Ethernet10.10.1.1 50331652 NETGEAR FA311 Fast Ethern... Up Ethernet10.10.1.0 67108869 Dial in adapter DownRAS 0.0.0.0 0 line1 Up RAS 151.200.238.11 on 16777218 dhcp TCP/IP stack's Routing Table: Net MaskGateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 line1 1 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 NETGEAR FA310TX Fast Ethe... 2 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 NETGEAR FA311 Fast Ethern... 2 151.200.0.0 255.255.0.0 line1 1 DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1024 - 10.10.1.1:53 for ftp3.freebsd.org dns: query from 10.10.1.210:1024 id 41361 dns: question: A, ftp3.freebsd.org dns: reply: ftp3.freebsd.org has 198.82.184.28 DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1025 - 10.10.1.1:53 for ftp3.freebsd.org dns: query from 10.10.1.210:1025 id 41362 dns: question: A, ftp3.freebsd.org dns: reply: ftp3.freebsd.org has 198.82.184.28 TCP: packet 1278, length 74, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: SYN , seq:4161382813 ack:0 TCP: packet 1282, length 74, 151.200.238.11:45050 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: SYN , seq:4161382813 ack:0 - Snip - Repeats 8 times and drops down to a length of 60 after try number 3 DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45051 - 199.45.32.43:53 for 9.136.168.217.in-addr.arpa DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45052 - 199.45.32.38:53 for 9.136.168.217.in-addr.arpa TCP: packet 1323, length 74, 198.82.184.28:21 - 151.200.238.11:45050, flags: SYN ACK , seq:77305705 ack:4161382814 TCP: packet 1327, length 74, 198.82.184.28:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: SYN ACK , seq:77305705 ack:4161382814 TCP: packet 1328, length 60, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: RST , seq:4161382814 ack:0 This is where the install program quit and asked if I wanted to retry. -Original Message- From: Willie Viljoen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willie Viljoen Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:26 AM To: Vaughan Moore Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection On Saturday 22 February 2003 16:55, Vaughan Moore wrote: I'm installing 4.7 at home. The Intel box is behind a NAT running on a Win98 box with ZoneAlarm running. The point of installing 4.7 is so that I can replace the 98 box as my gateway to my Verizon DSL connection. My installation fails when the program tries to access one of the ftp servers. When the time-out occurs I get an installation media error message. I know that my subnet on the NAT works because when I plug a 2000 machine into the gateway I can access the Internet. However, I had to lower the Max MTU settings in the registry to do it. I understand that PPPoE requires a lower MTU setting, but I'm not sure how to set MTU in the installation program. Can anyone help me with the problem? Vaughan Moore I'm almost sure MTU is not the problem in this case, the Windows machine should be taking care of that. Try setting FTP into passive mode in the installer's options screen, or turning off passive mode if that's the default on your version. Windows 98 NATs are not famous for handling FTP properly. -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: mdmfs /tmp and fstab on 5.0
I wrote: ln -s mdmfs /sbin/mount_mfs Yes, that's a workaround I had in mind. I can't see any problem there, if the mdmfs program is compatible with mount_mfs. I mean, the manpage even explicitly says, the mdmfs Ok, mdmfs is not fully compatible with mount_mfs, since you don't specify a swap device as parameter but, for example, /dev/md0. Other than that it seems to work ok, when called as mount_mfs via fstab (thru a symlink). I now have the following line in fstab: /dev/md0 /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,nosymfollow,-s256m 0 0 Is there any reason that softupdates is enabled on the md filesystem by default? Wouldn't async do the trick aswell? -- Matthias Buelow To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Verizon DSL FreeBSD?
(snip) I am resetting ports 113 and 27374 from my firewall, but not port 80. From my work system, port 80 is shown as filtered by nmap. Other than that, everything above looks exactly right. Is it possible that port 80 is being reset elsewhere? What command line did you use? nmap -P0 68.160.158.62 I used this: nmap -sT -P0 -O -v -oN ~/scan.txt -p 80 68.160.158.62 And got this: Port State Service 80/tcp filteredhttp (snip) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Trouble with SMC2602W wireless card
Pascal Giannakakis wrote: Now i got the SMC 2602W (the package says it is version 2 :/ ) which has a Admtek ADM8211 chip on it. BLOODY! I plugged in the card, and hey, of course it does NOT work. pciconf -v -l: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:8:0: class=0x028000 card=0x260210b8 chip=0x82011317 rev=0x11 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Admtek Inc' class= network Andrea's tip does not help here, as there is no information in pci_vendors what to add exactly in wi_if_pci.c. Well, who can help now? Where to go next? I found a guy who is working on a driver for the Admtek ADM8211 wireless chipset. I've contacted him about my 2602W card, and he's going to try to add it to his driver. Apparently a lot of low-cost cards are using this chipset now. He said he was making progress on the driver but couldn't give me a release date. I think I'm going to wait and see what he comes up with. Until then I may throw the card in a spare computer and install Win98, a NIC, and some kind of bridging software, as a temporary measure. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
QPopper
How can I compile (install) and set up Qpopper with TLS support? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Using mount... (SOLVED)
Chris Phillips wrote: - Hi, I have read man mount googled lots but I am at a loss as how to mount the 2 partitions on my 2nd hard disk. I've created 2 new partitions on it: /dev/ad1s1b (swap) and /dev/ad1s1e /data (ufs) Ideally, I'd like to mount both the swap the /data partition, then use mount -p to give me the correct format of the required /etc/fstab entries... I am stumbling at the first step unfortunately :-( aphrodite# uname -a FreeBSD aphrodite.furrie.net 4.8-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #1: Thu Feb 20 23:27:51 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APHRODITE i386 aphrodite# dmesg (somewhat snipped) ad0: 19092MB WDC WD200EB-00BHF0 [38792/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ad1: 114473MB WDC WD1200BB-00CAA1 [232581/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA66 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a aphrodite# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data mount: /dev/ad1s1e on /data: incorrect super block Matthew said: - Right. First of all, swap partitions aren't mounted as such. You just have to tell the system to start swapping onto the partition: # swapon /dev/ad1s1b To make that happen automatically on reboots, add a line like so to /etc/fstab: /dev/ad1s1b none swap sw 0 0 In order to mount your /data partition, either you need to tell the mount command all the parameters it needs: # mount -t ufs -o rw /dev/ad1s1e /data or you need to enter the equivalent data into /fstab so that mount can look up what it needs to know there. There are some other fields in fstab that 'mount -p' will give default values, but that you'll probably want to set to something useful. Try something like this in fstab: /dev/ad1s1e /data ufs rw 2 2 Oh, and do make sure you've created a filesystem on the partition before you try and mount it.. # newfs /dev/ad1s1e Josh also mentioned newfs... Chris Phillips thanks all as this is now SOLVED! I was experiencing some difficulty, as if I added the said lines into /etc/fstab, I would be unable to boot completely. This was possibly due to the fact that when I used /stand/sysinstall to fdisk the drive label the partitions, it would seem to have not done anything... Oh dear! I tried again (omitting the swap space as already have a big'un on the 1st drive (ad0). I used the W option in the label editor which seemed to do the trick now with the fstab file looking like the one below, things are wonderful again ;-) aphrodite# more /etc/fstab # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/ad0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad0s1f /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad0s1g /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad0s1e /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/ad1s1e /data ufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc/proc procfs rw 0 0 I can now get the system back to normal, (having copied the contents of the /data disk all over the place, while I reformatted it)... /usr being somewhat crowded at the moment! That's not to mention me XP box that's completely maxed out with copied data ;-) aphrodite# df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a128990 30598 8807426% / /dev/ad0s1f 257998 428 236932 0% /tmp /dev/ad0s1g17586670 15102178 107756093%/usr /dev/ad0s1e257998 6188 231172 3% /var /dev/ad1s1e115394404 225978 1059368740% /data procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc Thanks again all xx end intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
trouble with linux java install.
Checksum OK for j2sdk-1_3_1_06-linux-i586.bin. === linux-sun-jdk-1.3.1.06_1 depends on file: /compat/linux/lib/libc.so.6 - found ELF interpreter /compat/svr4/lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found Abort trap *** Error code 134 I recieve the above error msg when I do a make install clean on the linux java sun jdk13.I've typed Linux at a shell promte and I get informed that the linux driver is running. I've tried as a work around creating a link from the svr4 to the linux folder thinking it would find it in the correct place and that would work. I've also done a clean install and upgraded the ports.. and that hasn't helped eithere. I'm running freebsd 4.7 stable. thank you for your help __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: mdmfs /tmp and fstab on 5.0
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Matthias Buelow wrote: Jan Grant writes: ln -s mdmfs /sbin/mount_mfs Yes, that's a workaround I had in mind. As I recall, mdmfs wasn't called mount_mfs at the time because the author wasn't prepared to fight the battle he assumed (probably correctly) would arise out of doing so. I can't see any problem there, if the mdmfs program is compatible with mount_mfs. I mean, the manpage even explicitly says, the mdmfs utility is designed to be a work-alike and look-alike of the deprecated mount_mfs(8). Why then the different name, especially with the result that it can no longer be used with fstab? I mean, the old mount_mfs doesn't seem to exist anymore so there would be no naming conflict. Semantics. It doesn't mount an mfs filesystem, so it shouldn't be called mount_mfs. I personally think it's a fairly large breach of POLA - this isn't really an argument I subscribe to either. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ ioctl(2): probably the coolest Unix system call in the world To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
ïðî ìåäèöèíñêèå äîñòèæåíèÿ â îáëàñòè äèàãíîñòèêè Gf2
Title: , ! . , , . , , , , , ??. ?? 1,5 . ? ? , , , , : , , , , , , , , .. . : 1) - ; 2) - ; 3) ; 4) - ( , , ); 5) - ; 6) ( , , , , , ); 7) ( , ); 8) ; 9) ( ) - , , , ..; 10) , ; 11), , , () - , , , , , , .; , : , , - , , . , , ! , , . , , . ! . , , . - 50%! ! : ?-? www.dao-med.ru 10.00 18.00 : ? . -, . 125 ( ? -?). :(095)434-3626 (095)433-1695. ? . , . 23, 2, 8. :(095)995-5147 (095)291-8224. . To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: USB flash drive mount - da device?
Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Greetz, I use a USB pocket drive and am having the hardest time figuring out how to mount it into the filesystem. Following are what I thought to be important: [snip] Generally I use the command 'mount -t msdos /dev/rda0s1 /mnt' to mount this to my filesystem. Sometimes it works, sometimes it fails. When it does work I can only mount it as root. In order to be able to mount this as a regular user, do I have to put some flags into a line in /etc/fstab? What would be the best way to make this drive user mountable? The other question is, is there a better way to mount up the device or control it via a usb tool or is the way I am doing it correct? I'll tell you what I do with a CompactFlash card, which I believe should work for you as well. Most of the time I just need to copy over the stuff from the memory card to local disk. So I have a script that: 1. mounts the device 2. copies everything over from the card to a directory on the local disk 3. unmounts This script is hooked from pccardd (and in your case it'll be hooked from usbd) so it runs as root. I'm using the -nrp flags to cp, so it won't overwrite any existing files. This works ok if whatever is writing to the device is always generating fresh names for new files (which is true in my case). If there is possible name-collision, you can change the script to put everything in a directory with a timestamp in its name. Now, for the times I want to directly manipulate the CF card (usually big deletions), I use the automounter. It'll automatically mount the card when I access /auto/localhost/cf, and unmount it after 5 minutes of no access. You need to remember not to pull the card/usb-thingie out while it's still mounted (if you're in a hurry, become root and umount). For more details about this, I recommend reading http://www.daemonnews.org/200202/automounting.html Also, for msdos mounts, it's usually most convenient to chown the directory underneath the mount point so it's owned by the primary user of the machine and his/her group. This way, once the files are copied over by the script, they're still owned by you and you can write or delete them easily (I found that the -u and -g flags to mount_msdos don't help you here: cp -r will still create any intermediate directories as root/wheel). Note you can use either the usbd/pccardd hook or the automount method, or both - neither depends on the other to work. -- Dan Pelleg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Elaboração de cartas comerciais
COMUNICADO IMPORTANTE!! Estamos lançando o KIT DE CARTAS COMERCIAIS, que sana suas dúvidas na elaboração de: agradecimentos, atestados e declarações, avisos, cartas de cobrança, cartas em inglês, comunicados, convites, contratos, propostas, empregos, solicitações e pedidos, telegramas, cartas por e-mail, etc. Composto de 02 (dois) disquetes com 150 modelos de documentos cada um, mais livreto 20 páginas, com técnicas de redação comercial. Indicado para: secretárias em geral, gerências, Rh, executivos, estudantes e empresas de toda ordem. Este kit possui um preço ínfimo em relação ao que poderá gerar no aperfeiçoamento da comunicação de sua empresa. Acesse nossa Home Page para mais detalhes: http://www.redacaodecartas.ihp.com.br Ps: Caso não queira receber novas mensagens e novidades sobre esse assunto, acesse: http://www.remova-me.ihp.com.br To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
802.1q trunking
I'm trying to set up interVLAN routing on a Cisco 2950-24 switch, and in order for that to work I need a router that I can trunk with. Is it possible for FreeBSD to do 802.1q trunking? TIA, Josh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Fwd: Cvsup Handbook Example
Since the major portion of the world's misery, both past and present, can be directly attributed to organized religion, I find this incessant prattling about the demon (INTENTIONAL misspelling) logo and some of the other things like this thing below to be totally offensive. The Middle East is in a shambles and those people have been squabbling for 5000 years over who's ideas about God are right. Europe has fared no better and neither has the New World - just ask the Native Indian population. Millions of people have died over religion. It doesn't really matter which one. Pick one - they are ALL equally guilty. The short-sighted narrow-minded viewpoint expressed below is PRECISELY the mind-set that encourages and promotes things like the Inquisition. Since it does nothing but add to the sum total of human misery, I find postings like this to be highly offensive. If you think that you might be going to hell over reading something that says cvsup666, then you are probably already in one and too brainwashed to get out. At http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html, cvsup666 is used as an example. Out of all the possible three number combos, why was 666 used? As a Christian, this does bother me and I would like to know why exactly it was used. I do not think this is being extreme or unreasonable. Please note that I do not want to start a confrontation or cause problems etc... with this question. Simply the answer. If you would prefer, please feel free to email me directly if you feel this may cause problems on this list. I help admin a few freebsd servers and so this of extra interest to me. notvalid To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson, CISSP, Rev. Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. --Plato To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: 802.1q trunking
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 15:18, Josh Paetzel wrote: I'm trying to set up interVLAN routing on a Cisco 2950-24 switch, and in order for that to work I need a router that I can trunk with. Is it possible for FreeBSD to do 802.1q trunking? Sure. I do 802.1Q trunking with a 2924XL and -STABLE at work. Joe TIA, Josh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Boot from disk
Hi all I have an IMB ThinkPad 765D by design and age it will not boot from a CD. To load Linux on it I used a specific RH boot diskette that would allow me to use a CD ROM connect through a serial cable. It has both a CD and floppy but you can only have one or the other;( Is there anything like that for FreeBSD. I am digging in Google but if there's hope let me know Cheers M;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Mirror Command
The mirror command is saying: % ps axw | grep mirror 9704 p0- S 0:43.26 mirror redhat:ftp.netcraft.com.au:pub/redhat \ Failed to get file 550 linux/6.2/en/os/i386/misc/src/trees/tmp/glibc-\ 2.1.3-9. (The \ are to indicate it's really on one line but it won't wrap nicely to 72 characters) The job hasn't stopped. At least it hasn't returned from the bg and told me it's died and it still appears to be doing *something*. Does anyone know whether that's a major problem or whether that's just mirror reporting something and continuing to mirror on? DSL -- I am big, it's the pictures that got small! (Norma Desmond, Sunset Boulevard) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Boot from disk
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 17:04, Mike wrote: Hi all I have an IMB ThinkPad 765D by design and age it will not boot from a CD. To load Linux on it I used a specific RH boot diskette that would allow me to use a CD ROM connect through a serial cable. It has both a CD and floppy but you can only have one or the other;( Is there anything like that for FreeBSD. I am digging in Google but if there's hope let me know Cheers M;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message Hi Mike, You could use a win98 boot floppy to get to the CD but the other way is to go to www.freebsd.org and search the handbook for installing from floppy. You will need to create two floppies boot.flp and ...uh..something else with the .flp extension that is on the freebsd cdrom. Thatis how I always do it. Hope it helps, -- Jon Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
ps: proc size mismatch
I last did a buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, installworld in December (from current STABLE sources via cvsup). I tried again a few weeks ago and today, and after booting to single-user get errors from ps about /proc (ps: proc size mismatch). uname from my working kernel world is: FreeBSD www.reppep.com 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Tue Dec 3 14:05:51 EST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/REPPEP i386 Commands I ran to update (in December successfully, and twice unsuccessfully this month): # more Makefile UPDATING # mergemaster -p ; make buildworld ~/buildworld-20030221.log ; make buildkernel ~/buildkernel-20030221.log # mergemaster found no changes # mergemaster -p # no changes found # make installkernel Searching the web, I see many people saying if ps complains about a mismatch, your world is out of sync with the kernel http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-trouble.html#KERNELCONFIG-NOBOOT. I know that, because I haven't done make installworld yet, but I'm trying to validate the new kernel first. Unfortunately, there isn't much info on how to validate the kernel (if it boots to the shell, is it fine??). Is there anything else I should test before make installworld? Thank you, Chris Pepper PS-Please cc me directly. -- Chris Pepper: http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/ Rockefeller University: http://www.rockefeller.edu/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Compiling Question
Hi all! Tonight I synced my source with Release 4.7 and recompiled. Prior to recompiling, I modified the make.conf file to NOT compile a number of items, like games, sendmail, etc. I'd like to try to build a lean system from source. After the entire source compilation process, I still found those items on my system. A review of the man page for make.conf leads me to believe that those items did not compile, yet the old versions still remain on the system. Am I correct? If this is true, how does one go about compiling a lean system with the essentials only? Can the make.conf file be modified in such a way to remove items from the system, like sendmail, games, etc.? I read the man page for make.conf then searched it for the word remove, but nothing is there. Thanks for the help! Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection
Well, at least now I'm getting packets back and forth. DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1024 - 199.45.32.43:53 for ftp2.freebsd.org DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45175 - 199.45.32.43:53 for ftp2.freebsd.org DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1025 - 199.45.32.43:53 for ftp2.freebsd.org DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45176 - 199.45.32.43:53 for ftp2.freebsd.org TCP: packet 5400, length 74, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: SYN , seq:2842580946 ack:0 TCP: packet 5404, length 74, 151.200.238.11:45177 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: SYN , seq:2842580946 ack:0 TCP: packet 5405, length 74, 130.94.149.162:21 - 151.200.238.11:45177, flags: SYN ACK , seq:1377839201 ack:2842580947 TCP: packet 5406, length 74, 130.94.149.162:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: SYN ACK , seq:1377839201 ack:2842580947 TCP: packet 5407, length 66, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580947 ack:1377839202 TCP: packet 5408, length 76, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580947 ack:1377839202 TCP: packet 5409, length 66, 151.200.238.11:45177 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580947 ack:1377839202 TCP: packet 5410, length 76, 151.200.238.11:45177 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580947 ack:1377839202 TCP: packet 5411, length 123, 130.94.149.162:21 - 151.200.238.11:45177, flags: ACK , seq:1377839202 ack:2842580947 TCP: packet 5412, length 123, 130.94.149.162:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: ACK , seq:1377839202 ack:2842580947 TCP: packet 5413, length 124, 130.94.149.162:21 - 151.200.238.11:45177, flags: ACK , seq:1377839259 ack:2842580957 TCP: packet 5414, length 124, 130.94.149.162:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: ACK , seq:1377839259 ack:2842580957 TCP: packet 5415, length 66, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580957 ack:1377839317 TCP: packet 5416, length 99, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580957 ack:1377839317 TCP: packet 5417, length 66, 151.200.238.11:45177 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580957 ack:1377839317 TCP: packet 5418, length 99, 151.200.238.11:45177 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580957 ack:1377839317 TCP: packet 5419, length 114, 130.94.149.162:21 - 151.200.238.11:45177, flags: ACK , seq:1377839317 ack:2842580990 TCP: packet 5420, length 114, 130.94.149.162:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: ACK , seq:1377839317 ack:2842580990 TCP: packet 5421, length 74, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580990 ack:1377839365 TCP: packet 5422, length 74, 151.200.238.11:45177 - 130.94.149.162:21, flags: ACK , seq:2842580990 ack:1377839365 TCP: packet 5423, length 86, 130.94.149.162:21 - 151.200.238.11:45177, flags: ACK , seq:1377839365 ack:2842580998 TCP: packet 5424, length 86, 130.94.149.162:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: ACK , seq:1377839365 ack:2842580998 But, I get this error message: Cannot parse information file for the bin distribution: I/O error. Please verify that your media is valid and try again. My ip gateway is 10.10.1.1 My name server is 199.45.32.43 My ip is 10.10.1.210 My netmask is 255.255.255.0 Again, thanks so much for the help. Vaughan -Original Message- From: Willie Viljoen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willie Viljoen Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:15 PM To: Vaughan Moore Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection You're one step closer. When doing network configuration, make sure you list a valid and real DNS server. Try setting it up to use the DNS at your ISP, or the winroute if it provides DNS. On Sunday 23 February 2003 0:08, Vaughan Moore wrote: Thanks so much for the suggestion. When I use passive mode I get an error message Could not open ftp connection to ftp3.freebsd.org. Service not available, closing control connection. When I hit OK another error message comes up unable to initialize selected media. Would you like to adjust you media configuration and try again? When I do that, I go through the network configuration process again, but I get an immediate error message Cannot resolve host name ftp3.freebsd.org! Are you sure that your name server, gateway and network interface are correctly configured? I'm using DHCP, and it is pulling the correct IP's for these. Here's the log in my Winroute NAT. What do you think I'm doing wrong? Vaughan Interface Table: Interface Status Medium IP address NAT Index NETGEAR FA310TX Fast Ethe... Up Ethernet10.10.1.1 50331652 NETGEAR FA311 Fast Ethern... Up Ethernet10.10.1.0 67108869 Dial in adapter DownRAS 0.0.0.0 0 line1 Up RAS 151.200.238.11 on 16777218 dhcp TCP/IP stack's Routing Table: Net MaskGateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 line1 1 10.10.1.0
Re: ps: proc size mismatch
On 2003-02-22 21:24, Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Commands I ran to update (in December successfully, and twice unsuccessfully this month): # more Makefile UPDATING # mergemaster -p ; make buildworld ~/buildworld-20030221.log ; make buildkernel ~/buildkernel-20030221.log # mergemaster found no changes # mergemaster -p # no changes found # make installkernel The proc size mismatch you're seeing is because your kernel and userland is not in sync. Reboot. Enter single user mode. Run 'installworld'. If you suspect 'installworld' can fail in the middle of it all, and leave you with a useless installation, half-updated and half-not, then make sure you have about 300 MB of free space in /somewhere and run: # cd /usr/src # make DESTDIR=/somewhere installworld if this works fine, then youcan safely delete everything in /somewhere and run the real 'installworld' without DESTDIR. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: ps: proc size mismatch
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I know that, because I haven't done make installworld yet, but I'm trying to validate the new kernel first. Unfortunately, there isn't much info on how to validate the kernel (if it boots to the shell, is it fine??). It's a pretty good indication, but not definite. I once tripped over a bug in a SCSI driver that caused failures under load, so I could do an installworld but not a buildworld. If you've got the time, you can always try running a buildworld on the new kernel. That's a thorough stress test. Is there anything else I should test before make installworld? Any hardware not touched in getting to the shell prompt that *has* to be working on your system. mike -- Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: ps: proc size mismatch
At 5:09 AM +0200 2003/02/23, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2003-02-22 21:24, Chris Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Commands I ran to update (in December successfully, and twice unsuccessfully this month): # more Makefile UPDATING # mergemaster -p ; make buildworld ~/buildworld-20030221.log ; make buildkernel ~/buildkernel-20030221.log # mergemaster found no changes # mergemaster -p # no changes found # make installkernel The proc size mismatch you're seeing is because your kernel and userland is not in sync. Reboot. Enter single user mode. Run 'installworld'. If you suspect 'installworld' can fail in the middle of it all, and leave you with a useless installation, half-updated and half-not, then make sure you have about 300 MB of free space in /somewhere and run: # cd /usr/src # make DESTDIR=/somewhere installworld if this works fine, then youcan safely delete everything in /somewhere and run the real 'installworld' without DESTDIR. So (aside from verifying sufficient free space), the only test to do after installkernel and before installworld is to make sure that the system can boot single-user? Thanks, Chris -- Chris Pepper: http://www.reppep.com/~pepper/ Rockefeller University: http://www.rockefeller.edu/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Hardware support under UltraSPARC
The 3c590 uses the 'vx' driver which is PIO/MMIO only. If it compiles on the sparc64 I suspect it will work fine. On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Maxime Henrion wrote: Alan Lai wrote: freebsd has those drivers for x86 machines, is that possible to compile them for ultrasparc machines? is there any way to get an x86 nic work under freebsd/ultrasparc? if so, whats the work that i have to do? please advice You first need to convert the card to use the busdma API if it's not using it already, and you then have to deal with endianness issues (FreeBSD/sparc64 is big endian). Look at the http://www.FreeBSD.org/projects/busdma/ for more information on busdma. More specifically, you can look at the xl(4) driver which has recently been converted to busdma and made endian-safe. is the freebsd-sparc kernel not open source? i cannot compile/custimize it myself? Err, the FreeBSD project is entirely opensource. The biggest part of the kernel is MI (machine independant) and thus doesn't have to be changed to work on other architectures. A smaller part of the kernel is MD (machine dependant) and needs to be written for every different architecture we support. The sparc64 specific sources of the FreeBSD kernel can be found in /usr/src/sys/sparc64. On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jeremy Faulkner wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:10:53AM -0500, Alan Lai wrote: Hello, I am a newbie to freebsd, I want to clarify something before I get into using it. I plan to put freebsd5 on a sun e250, this is a pci based ultrasparc machine, but at the same time, this machine has a non-sun hardware, which is a network card thats originally for x86 machine. This card is working probably under solaris w/ some non-official driver, is supported under linux/x86. My question is, will this card, intel fastethernet 100, or 3com590 work under freebsd/ultrasparc w/ some tiny tinkering? It's unlikely, since the drivers for those cards are commented out in sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC. The drivers probably need work to use busdma. I don't remember whether 3c590 cards are supported by xl(4). If so, it should just work on sparc64. It hasn't been uncommented in GENERIC yet, but I'll do it a second. The Intel card won't work on sparc64 yet, but I'm currently working on the fxp(4) driver for the busdma conversion. Once this is done, we need to make it endian-safe in order for it to work on sparc64. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-sparc in the body of the message -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL| ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | For Great Justice! | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Vinum, concantination and filesystems
Can I do this: I want to create a new filesystem that I can grow and/or mirror later by adding more drives without losing my existing data. I have been reading about Vinum but haven't found anything about growing filesystems without losing data. I am talking about some like Partition Magic. I have done a bit of searching for 'growable' filesystems under FreeBSD but I haven't been able to find much of anything about anything besides ufs. Also, I can't seem to get dns resolution for the Vinum website. Have these guys not been paying their bills? (www.vinumvm.org) -- David Feig (Scared of upgrading from 4.3 to 5.0) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Compiling Question
On Saturday, 22 February 2003 at 21:52:48 -0500, Terry J Dunlap Jr wrote: Hi all! Tonight I synced my source with Release 4.7 and recompiled. Prior to recompiling, I modified the make.conf file to NOT compile a number of items, like games, sendmail, etc. I'd like to try to build a lean system from source. After the entire source compilation process, I still found those items on my system. A review of the man page for make.conf leads me to believe that those items did not compile, yet the old versions still remain on the system. Am I correct? If this is true, how does one go about compiling a lean system with the essentials only? Can the make.conf file be modified in such a way to remove items from the system, like sendmail, games, etc.? I read the man page for make.conf then searched it for the word remove, but nothing is there. I do not have the answer, but may be you would find http://people.freebsd.org/~picobsd interesting reading? There was a thread about someone compiling it using R4.7 Kjell Thanks for the help! Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Vinum, concantination and filesystems
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 01:28:46AM -0300, David Feig wrote: Can I do this: I want to create a new filesystem that I can grow and/or mirror later by adding more drives without losing my existing data. I have been reading about Vinum but haven't found anything about growing filesystems without losing data. I am talking about some like Partition Magic. You might take a look at growfs. I have done a bit of searching for 'growable' filesystems under FreeBSD but I haven't been able to find much of anything about anything besides ufs. There isn't a growable filesystem so to speak, although in certain conditions growfs can grow a ufs file system. Also, I can't seem to get dns resolution for the Vinum website. Have these guys not been paying their bills? (www.vinumvm.org) Shh. Don't say vinum too loudly...it will wake Greg up. Josh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
HOWTO upgrade a FreeBSD production server
I'm hoping to get a few suggestions on a quick and safe method to upgrade a FreeBSD production server. To date, I've been doing the following: On a like configured staging server, cvsup the src tree. Then perform a full build and install as outlined in /usr/src/Makefile. After confirming that the host operates as planned, I create a tarball of /usr/src and /usr/obj. I then transfer and extract the tarball on the production server(s), where I then perform installkernel / reboot / installworld. I'd like to find something a little quicker that doesn't require so much free space on the production server. I've looked at DESTDIR and creating a tarball of that directory on the staging server, but I've had problems during extraction with files and the 'schg' flag. Any suggestions? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection
On Sunday 23 February 2003 4:57, Vaughan Moore wrote: Well, at least now I'm getting packets back and forth. But, I get this error message: Cannot parse information file for the bin distribution: I/O error. Please verify that your media is valid and try again. My ip gateway is 10.10.1.1 My name server is 199.45.32.43 My ip is 10.10.1.210 My netmask is 255.255.255.0 Again, thanks so much for the help. Vaughan Chances are the mirror you are using doesn't carry the distributions. Try installing from another one :) -Original Message- From: Willie Viljoen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willie Viljoen Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 5:15 PM To: Vaughan Moore Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection You're one step closer. When doing network configuration, make sure you list a valid and real DNS server. Try setting it up to use the DNS at your ISP, or the winroute if it provides DNS. On Sunday 23 February 2003 0:08, Vaughan Moore wrote: Thanks so much for the suggestion. When I use passive mode I get an error message Could not open ftp connection to ftp3.freebsd.org. Service not available, closing control connection. When I hit OK another error message comes up unable to initialize selected media. Would you like to adjust you media configuration and try again? When I do that, I go through the network configuration process again, but I get an immediate error message Cannot resolve host name ftp3.freebsd.org! Are you sure that your name server, gateway and network interface are correctly configured? I'm using DHCP, and it is pulling the correct IP's for these. Here's the log in my Winroute NAT. What do you think I'm doing wrong? Vaughan Interface Table: Interface Status Medium IP address NAT Index NETGEAR FA310TX Fast Ethe... UpEthernet10.10.1.1 50331652 NETGEAR FA311 Fast Ethern... UpEthernet10.10.1.0 67108869 Dial in adapter DownRAS 0.0.0.0 0 line1 Up RAS 151.200.238.11 on 16777218 dhcp TCP/IP stack's Routing Table: Net MaskGateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 line1 1 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 NETGEAR FA310TX Fast Ethe... 2 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0 NETGEAR FA311 Fast Ethern... 2 151.200.0.0 255.255.0.0line1 1 DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1024 - 10.10.1.1:53 for ftp3.freebsd.org dns: query from 10.10.1.210:1024 id 41361 dns: question: A, ftp3.freebsd.org dns: reply: ftp3.freebsd.org has 198.82.184.28 DNS: query 10.10.1.210:1025 - 10.10.1.1:53 for ftp3.freebsd.org dns: query from 10.10.1.210:1025 id 41362 dns: question: A, ftp3.freebsd.org dns: reply: ftp3.freebsd.org has 198.82.184.28 TCP: packet 1278, length 74, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: SYN , seq:4161382813 ack:0 TCP: packet 1282, length 74, 151.200.238.11:45050 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: SYN , seq:4161382813 ack:0 - Snip - Repeats 8 times and drops down to a length of 60 after try number 3 DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45051 - 199.45.32.43:53 for 9.136.168.217.in-addr.arpa DNS: query 151.200.238.11:45052 - 199.45.32.38:53 for 9.136.168.217.in-addr.arpa TCP: packet 1323, length 74, 198.82.184.28:21 - 151.200.238.11:45050, flags: SYN ACK , seq:77305705 ack:4161382814 TCP: packet 1327, length 74, 198.82.184.28:21 - 10.10.1.210:1024, flags: SYN ACK , seq:77305705 ack:4161382814 TCP: packet 1328, length 60, 10.10.1.210:1024 - 198.82.184.28:21, flags: RST , seq:4161382814 ack:0 This is where the install program quit and asked if I wanted to retry. -Original Message- From: Willie Viljoen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Willie Viljoen Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 11:26 AM To: Vaughan Moore Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FTP installation through a NAT on a DSL connection On Saturday 22 February 2003 16:55, Vaughan Moore wrote: I'm installing 4.7 at home. The Intel box is behind a NAT running on a Win98 box with ZoneAlarm running. The point of installing 4.7 is so that I can replace the 98 box as my gateway to my Verizon DSL connection. My installation fails when the program tries to access one of the ftp servers. When the time-out occurs I get an installation media error message. I know that my subnet on the NAT works because when I plug a 2000 machine into the gateway I can access the Internet. However, I had to lower the Max MTU settings in the registry to do it. I understand that PPPoE requires a lower MTU setting, but I'm not sure how to set MTU in the installation program. Can anyone help me with the problem?
