While installing kdebase4, I get the following error. What can I do to get this
port installed.
[ 41%] Building CXX object
apps/konsole/src/CMakeFiles/konsoleprivate.dir/konsoleprivate_automoc.o
[ 41%] Building CXX object
apps/konsole/src/CMakeFiles/konsoleprivate.dir/BlockArray.o
[ 43%]
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop? For those
who
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:59:05AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
[...]
Google has a Vim group. I'm not sure if you need a Google account
or not.
Perhaps it might be better to go to Usenet straight ahead. There's a
NG comp.editors, mostly about vim.
Sorry for jumping in, but I think Usenet is
Well, this one was/is bizarre. I finally got my Brother 5250 networked
printer to print duplex (AKA noth sides :) using
% lpr file
but from OpenOffice, no matter what I do, it only prints on one side.
Has
anybody runn ito this before and know how to
Sabine Baer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:59:05AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
[...]
Google has a Vim group. I'm not sure if you need a Google account
or not.
Perhaps it might be better to go to Usenet straight ahead. There's a
NG comp.editors, mostly about vim.
Sorry for jumping
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Sabine Baerbae...@t-online.de wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:59:05AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
[...]
Google has a Vim group. I'm not sure if you need a Google account
or not.
Perhaps it might be better to go to Usenet straight ahead. There's a
NG
Hi,
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of Standard Desktop? For
Sabeeh Baig wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of Standard
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Sabeeh Baigsba...@jhu.edu wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Am I missing something about posting to newsgroups? My understanding is
ISP's don't utilize them anymore because of the ominous unavoidable
illegal behaviour.
No -- it's not legal problems, which offer no worse consequences than for
defamatory postings on blogs or
Roland Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:30:15AM +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote:
The problem is that I have no idea which files were affected.
So, now some questions:
First, how do I determine which files were corrupted? And how do I
recover these files?
From what you have shown it is
Am Mittwoch, den 19.08.2009, 07:59 + schrieb
freebsd-questions-requ...@freebsd.org:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:45:27PM -0400, Karl Vogel wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:23:29 -0700,
Walt Pawley w...@wump.org said:
W As speculation on my part, perhaps the six character limitation
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Well, this one was/is bizarre. I finally got my Brother 5250 networked
printer to print duplex (AKA noth sides :) using
% lpr file
but from OpenOffice, no matter what I do, it only prints on one side.
Has
anybody runn
I know freebsd is free but i would like to know how much will I pay if I
need additional package like updates and other useful software,and can
you tell how secure it is how protected i will be if i use freebsd
Disclaimer
This
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:42 AM, BONGANI MANGANYE205038...@cput.ac.za wrote:
I know freebsd is free but i would like to know how much will I pay if I
need additional package like updates and other useful software,and can
you tell how secure it is how protected i will be if i use freebsd
it's
BONGANI MANGANYE wrote:
I know freebsd is free but i would like to know how much will I pay if I
need additional package like updates and other useful software,and can
you tell how secure it is how protected i will be if i use freebsd
FreeBSD is free, and any updates are free. Third party
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baigsba...@jhu.edu wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 07:42:39 BONGANI MANGANYE wrote:
I know freebsd is free but i would like to know how much will
I pay if I need additional package like updates and other
useful software,and can you tell how secure it is how
protected i will be if i use freebsd
FreeBSD is released
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baig sba...@jhu.edu wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:51AM -0400, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something
Andrew Gould wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Sabeeh Baigsba...@jhu.edu wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:42:39PM +0200, BONGANI MANGANYE wrote:
I know freebsd is free but i would like to know how much will I pay if I
need additional package like updates and other useful software,
Nothing if you install stuff from ports or from any of the many free
software products
Op woensdag 19 augustus 2009 09:18:15 schreef Steve Bertrand:
Sabeeh Baig wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
on servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:23:07 -0400, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com wrote:
It works for me, using 3 steps:
1) Use CUPS instead of lpd
CUPS brings its own lpd, so in fact you're still using a lpd,
even if it's not the system one's. :-)
2) Install a PPD for the printer that knows about
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:22:11 +0200, Heiner Strauß heiner...@yahoo.de wrote:
Didn't need lower case at this time. REAL PROGRAMMERS USED FORTRAN
http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/real.programmers.html
When you're there, don't miss The story about Mel. By the
way... we have a Mel on our mailing
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:00:27PM +0200, beni wrote:
Op woensdag 19 augustus 2009 09:18:15 schreef Steve Bertrand:
Sabeeh Baig wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used
on
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:59:32AM +0200, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Thanks, I couldn't decipher these GEOM_LABEL messages, nice to know that
I can stop worrying. But for future incidents, the second question remains:
1. How do I best protect my system from disk errors in case of a crash?
One
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:57:21 -0400, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
FreeBSD is the one that does let users have an option. One of
those options is pcBSD. There are others who make up a bundle
with FreeBSD as the base OS that already has your GUI and other
things built for you -- a
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:54:51AM -0400, Sabeeh Baig wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something
In a parallel sort of thread to the current desktop thread, when I
installed FreeBSD 7.2 since I had plenty of disk space and memory I
installed X, however, I don't need it or really want it.
How can I pare that out of the system short of doing a complete rebuild?
Scott
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Scott Schappellarc...@silvertree.org wrote:
In a parallel sort of thread to the current desktop thread, when I installed
FreeBSD 7.2 since I had plenty of disk space and memory I installed X,
however, I don't need it or really want it.
How can I pare
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 12:17:10 Scott Schappell wrote:
In a parallel sort of thread to the current desktop thread, when I
installed FreeBSD 7.2 since I had plenty of disk space and memory I
installed X, however, I don't need it or really want it.
How can I pare that out of the system
I would like to try some experimental software on a netbook. Can
somebody recommend a netbook that can do FreeBSD.
Requirements:
1) Need to able to wipe out any ms-windows stuff, get installed, boot
up and running within 60 minutes of my time. Download, svn checkouts,
etc. not included.
On Aug 19, 2009, at 09:19:56, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
You can deinstall the x11/xorg metaport. (Or, pkg_delete -x xorg.)
The leftovers can be removed with ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves.
HTH
--
Glen Barber
Thanks, Glen and John. I pared out 72 packages. I kept ones that
seemed ambiguously
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 05:40:50PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:23:07 -0400, Bill Moran wmo...@potentialtech.com
wrote:
It works for me, using 3 steps:
1) Use CUPS instead of lpd
CUPS brings its own lpd, so in fact you're still using a lpd,
even if it's not the
Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl writes:
Is there a FBSD crash guide?
Not that I know of. The only guidance that really matter would be make sure
you have backed up critical data. No need for elaborate guides. :-)
Any data that isn't securely backed up, including offsite, isn't really
important
On 2009-08-19 09:29, Jeff Hamann wrote:
I would like to try some experimental software on a netbook. Can somebody
recommend a netbook that can do FreeBSD.
I've put FreeBSD on an Asus Eee PC before. It worked rather nicely. Just be
careful, because the wiki[1] page notes that some models contain
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:29:12 -0700, Jeff Hamann
jeff.ham...@forestinformatics.com wrote:
1) Need to able to wipe out any ms-windows stuff, get installed, boot
up and running within 60 minutes of my time. Download, svn checkouts,
etc. not included. I've tired of spending weekend marathons
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:00:20 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
It's been years since I tried CUPS; it gives me fits. In
short, it has never worked.
With modern printers that are not standard compliant, you
almost have no way around CUPS. Printers that can do PS don't
need
Sabeeh Baig wrote:
So, I've been wondering about something. FreeBSD is a general purpose
operating system, even though it has historically only heavily been used on
servers. Why is it that FreeBSD doesn't provide a desktop installation,
something similar to say Debian's option of Standard
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:23:29 -0700 Walt Pawley w...@wump.org
At 4:44 PM +0200 8/17/09, Heiner Strauß wrote:
[..]
Putting the symbol names in one word helped the linker / loader a lot.
Live was so easy.
Heiner
C(one word = 32 bit) .NOT. (some word processor software)
As
Well, after umch mucking around, the Brother 5250DN works with
OO and prints in Duplex only if I turn the dialog to OFF where is
say
Duplex __ [arrows]
Now that that's resolved, I can change the printer web page
config back to
Jeff Hamann wrote:
I would like to try some experimental software on a netbook. Can
somebody recommend a netbook that can do FreeBSD.
Requirements:
1) Need to able to wipe out any ms-windows stuff, get installed, boot up
and running within 60 minutes of my time. Download, svn checkouts, etc.
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:05:19 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Well, after umch mucking around, the Brother 5250DN works with
OO and prints in Duplex only if I turn the dialog to OFF where is
say
Duplex __ [arrows]
Do I understand this
Al Plant wrote:
Jeff Hamann wrote:
I would like to try some experimental software on a netbook. Can
somebody recommend a netbook that can do FreeBSD.
Requirements:
1) Need to able to wipe out any ms-windows stuff, get installed, boot
up and running within 60 minutes of my time. Download,
John Nielsen wrote:
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 12:17:10 Scott Schappell wrote:
In a parallel sort of thread to the current desktop thread, when I
installed FreeBSD 7.2 since I had plenty of disk space and memory I
installed X, however, I don't need it or really want it.
How can I pare that
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:11:20PM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Al Plant wrote:
Jeff Hamann wrote:
I would like to try some experimental software on a netbook. Can
somebody recommend a netbook that can do FreeBSD.
Too soon to know, but I've just ordered the Starling, a netbook sold by
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:05:19 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Well, after umch mucking around, the Brother 5250DN works with
OO and prints in Duplex only if I turn the dialog to OFF where is
say
Dear list,
I'd like to install FreeBSD 7.2 on my computer for testing purpuse and
eventually remove my Linux installation. Using FreeBSD in VirtualBox
works fine, so far. I can't install it on my real hardware, as the
installation media won't boot:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Olaf Leidingerleid...@web.de wrote:
Dear list,
I'd like to install FreeBSD 7.2 on my computer for testing purpuse and
eventually remove my Linux installation. Using FreeBSD in VirtualBox
works fine, so far. I can't install it on my real hardware, as the
Al Plant wrote:
Jeff Hamann wrote:
I would like to try some experimental software on a netbook. Can
somebody recommend a netbook that can do FreeBSD.
I'm displeased with my Lenovo S10. On the upside, all the hardware
worked on 7.2 out of the box, after I swapped the internal broadcom
wifi
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Aspire One (the original one) also works nicely with FreeBSD. If buying
a newer model it is best to check it at a shop display or stg, since the
hardware has changed and some models may be incompatible (esp. check
video card and wireless chipset. The
Aloha,
Terminal history gone.
I cannot get any recent version of FreeBSD 8.* to keep the csh or tcsh
history across a reboot in root or usr. It stays after exit and a
new login however. This happens on several machines that previously ran
FreeBSD 7* with no issues. One runs AMD64 and one
On 8.0-BETA2 with www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 and www/firefox35
installed.
As per the Handbook, a soft link in /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins to
/usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so.
nspluginwrapper -a -i runs normally.
linprocfs mounted, and nspluginwrapper -l shows
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Al Plant wrote:
Aloha,
Terminal history gone.
I cannot get any recent version of FreeBSD 8.* to keep the csh or tcsh
history across a reboot in root or usr. It stays after exit and a new
login however.
Does the history stick around if you do shutdown -r now instead of
Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Al Plant wrote:
Aloha,
Terminal history gone.
I cannot get any recent version of FreeBSD 8.* to keep the csh or tcsh
history across a reboot in root or usr. It stays after exit and a
new login however.
Does the history stick around if you do
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Al Plant wrote:
Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Al Plant wrote:
Terminal history gone.
I cannot get any recent version of FreeBSD 8.* to keep the csh or tcsh
history across a reboot in root or usr. It stays after exit and a new
login however.
Does the
On 8/19/09, Olaf Leidinger leid...@web.de wrote:
Dear list,
I'd like to install FreeBSD 7.2 on my computer for testing purpuse and
eventually remove my Linux installation. Using FreeBSD in VirtualBox
works fine, so far. I can't install it on my real hardware, as the
installation media won't
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:59:05AM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Steve Bertrandst...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Apologies up front for the off-topic'dness.
I'm thoroughly enjoying my new editor, and swiftly learning and
experiencing the benefits. As a matter of fact,
59 matches
Mail list logo
