On 2012-01-03 03:17, Tom Taylor wrote:
Thanks for the review, Brian.
On the 'incomplete state machine' issue: I'll think about additional
text to make sure things keep on moving along.
Thanks!
On the matter of PRI, etc.: I was working straight from the Syslog RFC,
RFC 5424. I can add
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft. .
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
also be considered an open issue.
The RFC Editor has definite concerns about such references (this
came up in today's RFC Editor Advisory Group meeting).
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-10-17 14:41, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
wfm
Thanks
Brian
On 2011-09-27 02:17, Barry Leiba wrote:
Thanks for the review, Brian.
I was briefly confused by Section 2.4. (Notify tag :importance)
It only mentions three possible values of Priority but RFC 3261
mentions four (the extra one is emergency) and states that
additional
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
I am happy with the changes made in the -02 draft, so s/Almost ready/Ready/.
Regards
Brian
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached UPDATED review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the
On 2011-09-13 04:33, Stewart Bryant wrote:
Brian
Re
In MPLS-TP, the GAL ... MUST NOT be used with PWs.
RFC 5586 doesn't explain this at all, so a sentence in the present draft
like This restriction was originally imposed because would be quite
informative.
At
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
(CCs trimmed)
Thanks Tobias.
On a personal comment/addition:
But maybe worth considering is that availability and integrity of sent
reviews is also important:
I noticed that recently some emails to mail-aliases did not get delivered to
the respective lists and therefore reviews and/or
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Assuming you mean draft-doria-genart-experience-04,
- Section 4.3 links to I-D.rfc-editor-rfc2223bis - this draft expired in
2008. New target needed.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide.html. There's nothing else afaik.
Regards
Brian
On 2011-07-21 23:41, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
Forgot
Pete,
On 2011-07-14 10:16, Pete McCann wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new
wrote:
Was there a resolution to this issue? Should we update the title to say
Implementation guideline and clarification of sender behavior in
persist condition?
On 6/5/2011 8:39 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
It would be a lot clearer to a new reader if the title indicated
that it's
Roni,
Thanks for the review.
In section 3 fifth paragraph An alternative approach is to to use
OK. I do need to update the draft because of a security comment,
so this will be fixed.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-07-07 01:40, Roni Even wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
Thanks Miguel.
Nits: Please expand acronyms at their first occurrence. This includes: GRE.
Noted, in case there's a new version needed; if not this can be done
as an RFC Editor note.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-07-01 20:38, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
I have been selected as the
On 2011-06-07 22:10, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-06-07 11:57, Fred Baker wrote:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
[RFC3056] Carpenter, B. and K. Moore, Connection of IPv6 Domains
via IPv4 Clouds, RFC 3056, February 2001
Fred,
See my comments in line. I'm on travel, but should be able to do an update
if necessary, after the LC ends.
Alexey,
Thanks for the review.
On 2011-06-07 05:16, Fred Baker wrote:
Thanks Alexey
Brian, I would presume that the IESG will be looking for an update responsive
to these
not sure..
How do we move forward on this one?
-Anantha
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:10 PM
To: Wesley Eddy
Cc: Anantha Ramaiah (ananth); draft-ietf-tcpm-
persist@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review
Wes,
This document contains no protocol and alters no protocol.
True, but it makes a strong statement about what implementations
must do. I had a quick look, and most implementation guidelines
are Informational, although one or two (e.g. RFC 5625) are BCP.
It would be a lot clearer to a new
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Hi Wes,
In TCPM, it was determined that RFC 1122 is not wrong or flawed, just
potentially unclear.
That's a judgment call that the WG's entitled to make, of course.
(Side comment: it would be useful for reviewers outside the WG
if writeups noted why a document was in a particular category
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
On 2011-05-11 18:29, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
On 2011-05-11 01:11, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2011-05-11
IETF LC End Date: 2011-05-12
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: Almost ready
Minor
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Hi Geoff,
On 2011-04-28 17:13, Geoff Huston wrote:
On 23/04/2011, at 11:51 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
It is a matter of local routing policy as to the actions to be
undertaken by a routing entity in processing those routes with
unknown validity states.
That leaves open
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this document. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
On 2011-04-10 03:13, Geoff Huston wrote:
On 09/04/2011, at 10:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Please see attached review.
draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10-carpenter.txt
Thanks Brian,
I'm not sure as to the appropriate form of response, but let me respond to
the two minor issues
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the
Thanks Jean.
Maybe a cover page is needed with links to
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki
and
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq
Both of those pages seem to need updates now.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-03-29 13:01, A. Jean Mahoney wrote:
Hi all,
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
on the IETF site in a day or
two. In the meantime, I attach it to this email.
Yours are the only Last-Call comments I received on this draft (I think), and
so I now believe all comments have been addressed.
Thanks.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Jonathan
wrote:
On Feb 6, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Please see attached review.
Before I incorporate these comments into the document, I thought I'd describe
our proposed changes:
Minor issues
[SEC1] Brown, D., Standards for Efficient Cryptography 1 (SEC
On 2011-02-17 23:58, Francis Dupont wrote:
...
- real spelling errors:
Feburary, tunnelled (one 'l' please), demuxing,
signalling (twice, one 'l' again).
No, this is correct British spelling. Americans spell these words
with one 'l'.
Brian
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Hi Stig,
Thanks, that looks fine to me.
Regards
Brian
On 2011-02-01 09:48, Stig Venaas wrote:
Thanks Brian. I have now submitted revision 04 that I believe
takes care of your issues. See below.
On 1/17/2011 5:23 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Please see attached review.
draft-ietf
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
, this document merely
identifies technical issues with these mechanisms and suggests best
practices for their deployment.
If you have concerns with that revised text, please let us know.
Thanks!
Peter
On 1/3/11 2:35 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
The -06 version
E Carpenter
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 8:19 PM
To:
draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns@tools.ietf.org;
General Area Review Team
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of
draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt
Please see attached review
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
will wait for a new
revision before asking the IESG to review the document.
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Joshi [mailto:bharat_jo...@infosys.com]
Sent: 20 December 2010 02:35
To: Brian E Carpenter; Andy Kessler (kessler)
Cc: draft-ietf-pim-group-rp-mapping@tools.ietf.org
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Peter,
Thanks for the background. Indeed, a sentence or two about this being
a temporary approach, as you suggest, would be very helpful.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2010-12-23 07:47, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 12/3/10 8:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote
that the
proposed techniques stretch the original semantic of HTTP and that the
HTTP protocol was not designed for this use... which is a fact rather
than a judgement.
Stefano
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 12/3/10 8:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com wrote:
This is real example
Hi Andy, thanks for responding so promptly. A few comments in line:
On 2010-12-18 18:36, Andy Kessler (kessler) wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for the review.
My comments are below annotated with Andy
Andy
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please
Please see attached review.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
I'm reissuing this review, after fixing a bug in my mail user
agent configuration that previously assigned it a video content-type.
Sorry about that, but it seems that there's some piece of DVD-reading
software that messes with my Thunderbird profile in a very odd way.
I am the assigned Gen-ART
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-05.txt
draft-ietf-morg-fuzzy-search-03-carpenter.txt
Description: video/ms-wm
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-martini-gin-10.txt
Reviewer:
the
guidance in Section 4.1 of [RFC1958] the use of FQDNs should be preferred
over IP addresses in the context of AAA based LMA discovery solutions.
- Jouni
On Oct 16, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Due to time-compression this is both a Last Call and pre-telechat review
Due to time-compression this is both a Last Call and pre-telechat review.
Brian
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-12
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence-04.txt
Hi Tim and co-authors,
Did we address your concerns?
Yes, thanks for the very thorough reply. I think all your proposed
updates are fine. As for:
The appearance of trees as examples comes in part from the limits of ASCII
art. Perhaps we can add an extra link or two to such examples to make
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-fecframe-sdp-elements-08.txt
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-roll-rpl-11.txt
Reviewer: Brian
draft-ietf-dna-simple-16-carpenter.txt
Description: video/ms-wm
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
I'm sorry... it took me half an hour to debug why Thunderbird was using a video
MIME type for plain text. Finally the attachment should be correct.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
I'm sorry... it took me half an hour to debug why Thunderbird was using a video
MIME type for plain text. Finally the attachment should be correct.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
Hi Elwyn,
Thanks. This is on the agenda this week, so let me respond quickly:
On 2010-08-10 03:13, Elwyn Davies wrote:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART,
please see
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
of the protocol, which is supported with the Version attribute.
Andrea Doherty
P.S. We will also address the Nits that you raised in the next update of the
draft.
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:57
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
.
-murtaza
-Original Message-
From: Al Morton [mailto:acmor...@att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 7:16 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter;
draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session-cntrl@tools.ietf.org; General Area
Review Team
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of
draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-session
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
301 - 400 of 619 matches
Mail list logo
