[gentoo-dev] Non-maintainer sandbox patching

Hello, So I provided a patch for a sandbox bug hitting bigger projects using -export-symbols-regex with a long list of object files. 3 months ago. Bug has been there since forever, reported 15 months ago, with some good clues to what's up since 9 months. It has been sitting there, collecting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 29.12.2016 kell 20:51, kirjutas Marc Schiffbauer: > * Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 29.12.16 um 16:52 Uhr: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd prefer "package versions" but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

Ühel kenal päeval, L, 24.12.2016 kell 02:29, kirjutas Raymond Jennings: > I hope this isn't a stupid question...but can we safely assume that > all such google code SRC_URI's have *already* been mirrored? > > If I understand the mirrors correctly, they serve as a sort of cache > of sorts of

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 14.12.2016 kell 15:35, kirjutas Andrew Savchenko: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 11:16:58 +0200 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > > Ühel kenal päeval, K, 14.12.2016 kell 13:08, kirjutas Sam Jorna: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 14.12.2016 kell 13:08, kirjutas Sam Jorna: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:35:28PM +1100, Sam Jorna wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:34:21AM +0700, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > > > > > > On 12/11/2016

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 06.12.2016 kell 20:59, kirjutas james: > > So I just now sent email to : > proxy-maint+subscr...@gentoo.org > > > NO answer on this attempt. ON this page:: > https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/all-lists.html > > All I see is: gentoo-proxy-maint > > Am I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 02.12.2016 kell 11:26, kirjutas Matt Turner: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko > wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to > > my understanding of them): > > > > 1) git atomic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 02.12.2016 kell 13:02, kirjutas Mike Gilbert: > The devmanual states: > > The name section should contain only lowercase non-accented letters, > the digits 0-9, hyphens, underscores and plus characters. Uppercase > characters are strongly discouraged, but technically valid.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 30.11.2016 kell 21:23, kirjutas Andrey Utkin: > My PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/2765 > > My bugzilla ticket linked to it: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599088 > > After my pull request from Nov 6, the following commit gets into > mainline: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Staffing Needs page is out of date

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 29.11.2016 kell 19:31, kirjutas Gokturk Yuksek: > Mart Raudsepp: > > > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 28.11.2016 kell 17:45, kirjutas Gokturk > > Yuksek: > > > > > > On 11/23/2016 12:31 AM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Staffing Needs page is out of date

Ühel kenal päeval, E, 28.11.2016 kell 17:45, kirjutas Gokturk Yuksek: > On 11/23/2016 12:31 AM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > The Staffing Needs page on the wiki [0] seems a little out of > > date, there are still mentions of "herds". I invite project leads > > and members to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 27.10.2016 kell 07:21, kirjutas Rich Freeman: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Mart Raudsepp <l...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > > > > > Projects that want explicit copyright or copyright assignments or > > CLAs > > are those that want

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

Ühel kenal päeval, E, 24.10.2016 kell 19:07, kirjutas Rich Freeman: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Matt Turner > wrote: > > > > In order to contribute to GNU projects, one must sign a copyright > > assignment statement. > > > > Gentoo doesn't have anything similar as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 26.10.2016 kell 14:58, kirjutas Kent Fredric: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:25:52 +0200 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > And I guess that even most ebuilds for new > > packages aren't written from scratch, but will be based on an > > existing > > ebuild or on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

Ühel kenal päeval, E, 24.10.2016 kell 15:29, kirjutas Matt Turner: > A former co-worker of mine is now at Google and wants to contribute > ebuilds he wrote for ChromeOS to Gentoo. They add packages necessary > for Vulkan (new 3D graphics API). > > For instance:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New USE_EXPAND: LLVM_TARGETS

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 28.09.2016 kell 08:39, kirjutas Michał Górny: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:31:06 +0200 > Marek Szuba wrote: > > > > > On 2016-09-27 22:51, Raymond Jennings wrote: > > > > > > > > Doesn't VIDEO_CARDS factor in on xorg-server's video driver > > > selection? 

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New USE_EXPAND: LLVM_TARGETS

Ühel kenal päeval, E, 26.09.2016 kell 00:42, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: > > The new system will be applied to 3.9.0 and ebuilds. > > VIDEO_CARDS > > flag will be removed completely because of no revdeps. > > People with radeonsi graphics set VIDEO_CARDS=radeon already

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New USE_EXPAND: LLVM_TARGETS

Ühel kenal päeval, P, 25.09.2016 kell 23:08, kirjutas Michał Górny: > I'd like to introduce a new USE_EXPAND for LLVM & clang. It'd be > named > LLVM_TARGETS, and it's going to replace the current solution based on > USE=multitarget & VIDEO_CARDS=radeon. > > - VIDEO_CARDS=radeon enabled

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed future EAPI feature: FILES whitelist

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 16.09.2016 kell 17:20, kirjutas Ulrich Mueller: > How does a file in FILESDIR get stale? The typical scenario is that a > patch will no longer be needed after a version bump and pruning of > old > ebuild versions. I fear that with FILES the problem would simply be > shifted:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for people willing to take care of Cinnamon

On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:43 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Hello > > > > Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining cinnamon > > ebuilds (specially since most of us are not even using it and, > > also, we > > already have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Developers, please work on underlinking issues!

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 18.08.2016 kell 23:56, kirjutas Alexis Ballier: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:20:41 -0700 > Daniel Campbell wrote: > > > On 08/18/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400 > > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > >   

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 11.08.2016 kell 18:00, kirjutas Mike Gilbert: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Kent Fredric > wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:07:27 -0400 > > Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > > > but realistically this should be > > > installed to

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 11.08.2016 kell 11:23, kirjutas james: > Whilst devs are discussing the future of Valve's offerings on > gentoo,  > it'd be wise to consider the effects of "Vulcan" as it is FOSS where > all  > video card vendors can inter-operate with multiple game vendors. > Vulcan  > will

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 11.08.2016 kell 11:05, kirjutas Ian Stakenvicius: > Wouldn't the most simple solution here would be to make a symlink for > libpcre.so.3 within the local bindir for each Valve or whatever > package that needs it?  This is a binary-package-supporting hack, > might as well do

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 11.08.2016 kell 12:56, kirjutas Ulrich Mueller: > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Aug 2016, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > > > Have you asked Debian why they are doing that? > > > I did find out but had since forgotten. Here it is: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 09.08.2016 kell 12:02, kirjutas Jason Zaman: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió: > > >  [...] > > > Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that > > > contains > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Augmenting the CPU_FLAGS_X86 list and creating CPU_FLAGS_PPC + CPU_FLAGS_ARM

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 02.08.2016 kell 15:25, kirjutas Michał Górny: > On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 17:15:41 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:08 PM, David Seifert > > wrote: > > > Dear friends, > > > while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.07.2016 kell 16:25, kirjutas james: > On 07/18/2016 03:03 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > * Rafael Goncalves Martins schrieb am 18.07.16 um 03:12 Uhr: > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko > > o.org> wrote: > > > > Set it for a minute or

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 07.06.2016 kell 20:28, kirjutas Michał Górny: >  > So here's how I would word it. I think if we combine a few different > texts, we may end up with something good ;-). > > --- > The LINGUAS USE flag group has been renamed to L10N, in order to > avoid > a conceptual clash

[gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N Author: Mart Raudsepp <l...@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2016-06-06 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 The LINGUAS USE_EXPAND has been renamed to L10N, to avoid a conceptual clash with the standard gettext LINGUAS behaviour. L10N controls which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Choosing GUI toolkits from multiple choices

> I drafted that mentioned USE_EXPAND idea as a means to get some > 'design from the scratch' discussion going and flesh out this way of > potentially doing it (such a USE_EXPAND was idly mentioned at start > by > others as something that was deemed too crazy, but I didn't find any > references).

[gentoo-dev] Choosing GUI toolkits from multiple choices

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 03.06.2016 kell 22:40, kirjutas Daniel Campbell: > You touched on the part that I'm most concerned about: choosing. If > the > 'GUI' USE_EXPAND gets in, do we maintainers check that variable and > if > there's no preference just build whatever? Will we not be expected to >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 03.06.2016 kell 22:40, kirjutas Daniel Campbell: > You touched on the part that I'm most concerned about: choosing. If > the > 'GUI' USE_EXPAND gets in, do we maintainers check that variable and > if > there's no preference just build whatever? As I don't want this thread to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 20:24, kirjutas Martin Vaeth: > Gentoo has chosen this name so that as a side effect of setting > USE=linguas_* you also get a correct LINGUAS variable exported > (according to the USE-settings and your settings and according > to the ebuild's IUSE.) > These

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui

Hello, So here's something more simple wrt GUI USE flags. Global USE=gui for gui - enable an optional graphics user interface or extra GUI tool (wording improvements welcome, once it's in principle agreed; but no point in bikeshed painting description wording till it is) Local USE flag

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 15:19, kirjutas Michał Górny: > As for LINGUAS, it should be left as a toy for advanced users and not > presented as a recommended solution. There is nothing advanced in it for the user, only the mess we have created with package manager behaviour and mis-use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 15:18, kirjutas Dirkjan Ochtman: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michał Górny > wrote: > > Excuse me but are you really serious? We are in this swamp because > > someone tried to be too smart. And what solution do you propose? > > Let's

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 01.06.2016 kell 12:18, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: > Ühel kenal päeval, T, 31.05.2016 kell 14:49, kirjutas Michał Górny: > > Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good > > solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Masterplan for solving LINGUAS problems

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 31.05.2016 kell 14:49, kirjutas Michał Górny: > Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good > solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS > as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a RFC on a draft solution that > I'd like afterwards to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 27.05.2016 kell 13:14, kirjutas Anthony G. Basile: > On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote: > > On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell > m> wrote: > > > I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016 > > > > Good to know, thanks for stopping

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 27.05.2016 kell 14:10, kirjutas waltd...@waltdnes.org: >   While we're at it, why are there 23 occurences of the "X" useflag > in > /usr/portage/profiles/use.local.desc when it exists in > /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc ???  I'm talking about stuff like... > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

Ühel kenal päeval, R, 27.05.2016 kell 13:14, kirjutas Anthony G. Basile: > On 5/27/16 12:59 PM, rindeal wrote: > > On 27 May 2016 at 18:54, landis blackwell > m> wrote: > > > I stopped reading after you reminded me it was 2016 > > > > Good to know, thanks for stopping

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

tions? I'm particularly interested in QA opinion here. I believe WilliamH wanted to spearhead this from their side. Regards, Mart Raudsepp Gentoo developer, GNOME team

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

Ühel kenal päeval, L, 21.05.2016 kell 11:19, kirjutas waltd...@waltdnes.org: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > > 3. We remove LINGUAS from USE_EXPAND and stop using it. If ebuilds > > have > > a good reason to use flags for localization, we introduce a new, > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Add awk wrapper - eawk - edit file in place

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 18.05.2016 kell 22:25, kirjutas aide...@gentoo.org: > From: Amadeusz Żołnowski > > awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place > is > desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it > look to the caller

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Add awk wrapper - eawk - edit file in place

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 19.05.2016 kell 18:51, kirjutas Amadeusz Żołnowski: > Ulrich Mueller writes: > > The EAPI 6 method would be to use "|| die -n". Then the caller can > > either call "eawk" if the function should die automatically, or > > "nonfatal eawk" if it should return

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new USE="win32" flag for mingw and prefix/windows support

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 21.04.2016 kell 15:42, kirjutas Ian Stakenvicius: > b) -1 for making it global right now pending resolution of logistics > for the profiles/base/use.mask entry, I don't think it's unprecedented to just globally use.mask a USE flag even if it's not declared a global USE flag.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new USE="win32" flag for mingw and prefix/windows support

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 20.04.2016 kell 22:18, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: > Basically the only real point I have is that anything kernel_* to > control this probably doesn't make sense. > Oh, just to clarify and avoid misunderstanding: I did not intend to ack the changes to gdk-pixbu

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new USE="win32" flag for mingw and prefix/windows support

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 21.04.2016 kell 06:53, kirjutas Kent Fredric: > On 21 April 2016 at 06:38, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > Well so far the only needs I have run into for the win32 flag has > > been in relation to choosing UI toolkit support for cairo and gtk+ > > (and possibly

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc 2.23 and willfully breaking stuff

others and be a little bit more conservative about such stuff for ~arch, especially when it's Gentoo specific. A heavily disgruntled Gentoo ~arch maintainer unable to do his job due to others adding breakages he shouldn't care about, Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: can someone help me or give me access to planet.gentoo.org

Ühel kenal päeval, P, 03.04.2016 kell 01:55, kirjutas Duncan: > Anthony G. Basile posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2016 05:31:44 -0400 as > excerpted: > > > I wrote a long blog post and I'd like to see it on planet > > gentoo.  I > > plan on blogging a lot more too and need to see this problem fixed. > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: New virtual: virtual/jack for jack protocol implementations

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 04.02.2016 kell 15:05, kirjutas Alexis Ballier: > As its name does not imply, jack2 is not really the successor of > jack1 > but rather another implementation of the same protocol [2]. As such, > I > don't think it is wise to add jack2 as an update to jack1 in >

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=desktop-file request

t only once in a while (but at least once). Calling this after each package might be unnecessary, and a couple times in the whole emerge session should be fine - that MIME association can be a bit delayed, and not called after each package postinst. On behalf of the GNOME team, Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominate global USE-flag harfbuzz

On K, 2015-01-07 at 07:29 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: $ grep :harfbuzz profiles/use*desc profiles/use.local.desc:dev-libs/efl:harfbuzz - Enable complex text shaping and layout support. profiles/use.local.desc:dev-qt/qtgui:harfbuzz - Use media-libs/harfbuzz for text shaping (experimental in Qt

Re: [gentoo-dev] stepping out

On P, 2014-10-12 at 20:47 +0200, Angelo Arrifano wrote: * media-plugins/gst-plugins-jack the version in portage is old This is in GStreamer herd and will receive bumps together with the rest very soon (and mustn't be bumped without everything else). But we could use help from people known to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using LINGUAS

Hello, LINGUAS is a concept in gettext tooling. I do not understand why we overload it in package management in the first place. It is an environment variable that we set up in make.conf, because that's an easy way to get it into the build environment to have the standard way of limiting

Re: [gentoo-dev] remove USE flag ldap from profile desktop

On L, 2014-03-22 at 12:50 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:46:58 +0100 Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 IMO it is the choice of users to opt in for LDAP, not to opt out for it. I'm convinced that the

[gentoo-dev] Use slot deps for all gstreamer package dependencies (including plugins); preparation for gstreamer-1.0

to be SLOT=0 accidentally, but this has been slotmoved now, so SLOT 0.10 dep there as well. Thanks, Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Any official position from Gentoo about systemd, mdev and udev-static ?

On N, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Tobias Klausmann wrote: Hi! On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 01:57:48PM +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote: As a first crude datapoint, I compared the build times (configure+make) of udev-171-r6 and -188 on our dev Alpha.

Re: [gentoo-dev] supporting static-libs

static or dynamic, but not both, as per. upstream requirements (no idea why). So FTR, this is not always a matter of personal taste. static-libs is for installing static libraries IN ADDITION to shared libraries, not instead. USE=static is for what you have in mind there. Best, Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Global Systemd USE Flag

typically control the functionality of compiled binaries, usually involving external dependencies to achieve such extra functionality. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=2chap=2#doc_chap1_sect2 Best Regards, Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots

On L, 2012-06-23 at 15:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:06:58 -0400 Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't quite understand why this would be necessary. Would funky-slots just be used in situations where ebuilds with the same PV but different PVR have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Janitor scripts

an upstream tarball domain name or path repeats, and that's definitely not what thirdpartymirrors is for. Best, Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Understanding the LINGUAS variable and use-expand

if we had a tool to set the LINGUAS that handled this variant logic nicely, or just educating users in documentation, make.conf.example comments and so on. As well, there are probably a few other places in the tree where conclusion #1 and #2 should be applied. Best, Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge

language directories in the image. Best, Mart Raudsepp

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping localepurge

On E, 2012-01-30 at 06:56 -0500, Philip Webb wrote: 120130 Mart Raudsepp wrote: Do you even have LINGUAS set in /etc/make.conf or something? Because at least evince, gdk-pixbuf, xkeyboard-config and gnome-doc-utils DO honor LINGUAS. All GNOME packages that use intltool (that is pretty

Re: [gentoo-dev] Free Gentoo

free software philosophies. We provide the means, and e.g Ututo distribution and thousands of Gentoo users make use of it. Best Regards, Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Linux developer, GNOME team

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo News file about GNOME 3.2's unmasking

On L, 2011-11-26 at 12:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Hello folks, Attached is a short news file announcing the unmasking of GNOME 3.2 with a link to the upgrade guide. Since GNOME 3 is already in the tree, and the news file content is straightforward, I'd like to commit this in 24hrs if

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Remove USE=v4l2 and rename the consumers to plain USE=v4l?

reason not to congregate everything to USE=v4l2 instead? -- Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling

the version bumps themselves due to potentially increased work for the maintainer. -- Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: LinNeighborhood and mondo

what could be used instead. # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (30 Oct 2010) # For Linux 2.4, bug 335455. Time to upgrade to 2.6. # Masked for removal in 30 days sys-apps/mondo -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations

comparison) -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection

always install them, they are just not that big compared to the include files that get always installed too. But embedded guys can easily delete all of /usr/include, but typelibs (containing the introspection data) may be necessary at runtime. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?

is unable to set more than 30 or so days into the future. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

of globally. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

other guys already did though. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches news item for review)

On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:16 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:40:00PM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp: Instead I think we should be improving eselect profile to support multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go! I suggest reading my comments... Unless I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go! I suggest reading my comments... -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches news item for review)

) Profit. Obviously I doubt to have time to work on it personally. I hope the guys pushing for adding even more subprofiles can pick up this idea and implement it, if discussion gives consensus this is a good way forward. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

requirement by cups. It doesn't need poppler-glib, so utils and bindings being a separate package, as it always was before, would nicely solve it. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

poppler-cairo probably instead), poppler-qt3, poppler-qt4 and poppler-utils. I don't believe we should selectively cripple one GUI toolkit with not having proper printing support out of the box on a desktop profile, while others do, just because maintainers are lazy. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

considered harmful? On some non-desktop systems perhaps, yes. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] URGENT: exotic arches need Qt 4.5.3 stabilization

not checking issues with it by default. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

of quicker stabilization of package I maintain myself I try to state in the STABLEREQ bug why the quicker stabilization. Is it stated in any documentation that 30 days is a policy? -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GNOME 2.26 upgrade

On T, 2009-10-06 at 02:11 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: Hello, See attached news item for consideration. Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very welcome. Attached is a tweaked version with wording fixes from dabbott and author as me instead of team, as I understood

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GNOME 2.26 upgrade

to look for a metadata/news with my setup, so I can't verify on my end everything is working right to proceed with this.. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] News Item: GNOME 2.26 upgrade

Hello, See attached news item for consideration. Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very welcome. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio Title: Upgrade to GNOME 2.26 Author: Gentoo Gnome Team gn

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

don't get the correct and desired things enabled for their desktop environment of choice. So for the 3 prefix-linux profiles that's using 2008.0 now, you can feel safe and simply change the parents to point at 10.0. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding a warning to description of global flag profile.

this is a call for testing that, as combinatory CFLAGS enabling -fomit-frame-pointer is your reasoning here. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

, never count on common sense. Elected people rarely have any. If they do during the election, it disappears after taking their position. I think the vast majority of people here have seen that over the years. My $0.02 worth. Dale :-) :-) Regards, Ferris -- Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 25

is the preliminary meeting agenda. I acknowledge that agenda, or something. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 25

and don't need to be looked up with what is actually meant when they are being referred to in short names. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

On E, 2009-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: People I nominate: * leio / mraudsepp, because he's done a really good job protecting the distro's interests I accept -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flags (network, 3dnowext, static-libs, mtp)

On K, 2009-06-03 at 21:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: Mart Raudsepp wrote: On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which can be converted, that'd be 10. USE network Enable networking support USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flags (network, 3dnowext, static-libs, mtp)

currently are? So that everyone won't need to look up by themselves or guess the global description. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

On K, 2009-05-20 at 11:36 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Mart Raudsepp wrote: The maintainer-wanted team owns that foo package then, which is why having a different mail alias than the existing one for new package requests that aren't in gentoo tree yet would be a good idea. Ok, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

On N, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: В Чтв, 14/05/2009 в 03:32 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: Project maintainer-wanted = Mart, I think that it's good idea to create such project but with a different goals. I think currently maintainer-wanted alias

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

On K, 2009-05-20 at 00:55 +, Duncan wrote: Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org posted 1242777068.30374.30.ca...@localhost, excerpted below, on Wed, 20 May 2009 02:51:08 +0300: It is about getting popular packages (based on various metrics) into the official tree for easy access

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

of this directly applies to the subject at hand, because while we're talking new versions of packages already in-tree here, the subject at hand is packages that aren't in-tree in any form yet. Sorry, still felt like replying with my view on Gentoo vs dist-upgraded distros :) -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo

<    1   2   3   4   >