directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.31-gentoo'
LD
/dev/shm/portage/app-emulation/kvm-kmod-88-r1/work/kvm-kmod-devel-88/x86/built-in.o
CC [M]
/dev/shm/portage/app-emulation/kvm-kmod-88-r1/work/kvm-kmod-devel-88/x86/svm.o
CC [M]
/dev/shm/portage/app-emulation/kvm-kmod-88-r1/work/kvm
/portage/app-emulation/kvm-kmod-88-r1/work/kvm-kmod-devel-88/x86/built-in.o
CC [M]
/dev/shm/portage/app-emulation/kvm-kmod-88-r1/work/kvm-kmod-devel-88/x86/svm.o
CC [M]
/dev/shm/portage/app-emulation/kvm-kmod-88-r1/work/kvm-kmod-devel-88/x86/vmx.o
CC [M]
/dev/shm/portage/app-emulation/kvm-kmod
* Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com [120406 11:40]:
[..]
To me it looks safe to emerge -C kmod and then emerge
module-init-tools if you want to go that way. I'd do an equery files
kmod and carefully study what you're getting with that package, or
else push a bug request up to that package
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:06:05PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu wrote:
Hello,
Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when
Hi list!
Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and keep
sys-apps/module-init-tools, does udev still load modules or is kmod a
required flag for that?
Thanks in advance!
Florian Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mike Gilbert:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu wrote:
Hello,
Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when
compiled complains about missing modules-support
in sys-apps/kmod, which when
compiled complains about missing modules-support in the kernel (as it
should).
Doing an equery d sys-apps/kmod I can see that the following two packages
depends on sy-apps/kmod:
sys-fs/udev-197-r8 (kmod ? =sys-apps/kmod-12)
virtual/modutils-0 (sys-apps/kmod
Hi all,
Just a question...
Can I replace module-init-tools with kmod and stay with udev-171-r10 for
the time being?
Asked another way - is kmod fully supported by older releases of udev
like 171-r10?
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
* Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com [120406 11:40]:
[..]
To me it looks safe to emerge -C kmod and then emerge
module-init-tools if you want to go that way. I'd do an equery files
kmod and carefully study what you're
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:46:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Also, should I manually fix the blockers:
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
(sys-apps/module-init-tools is blocking sys-apps/kmod-12-r1)
[blocks B ] sys-apps/kmod (sys-apps/kmod is blocking
sys-apps/module-init-tools
Hello,
Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when
compiled complains about missing modules-support in the kernel (as it should).
Doing an equery d sys-apps/kmod I can see that the following two
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu wrote:
Hello,
Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when
compiled complains about missing modules-support in the kernel
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Hi list!
Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and keep
sys-apps/module-init-tools, does udev still load modules or is kmod a
required flag for that?
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think so
On 03/04/2013 14:54, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, I am prepping for the udev update this weekend, getting everything
updated that doesn't pull in the udev updates.
First thing I did was to eliminate the module-init-toolskmod Blocker:
emerge -C module-init-tools %% emerge kmod
and noted
On Saturday 23 March 2013 15.06:05 Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Dan Johansson dan.johans...@dmj.nu wrote:
Hello,
Some of my servers are running with a kernel without module-support.
On these servers something has started to pull in sys-apps/kmod, which when
:
emerge -C module-init-tools %% emerge kmod
and noted the following warnings/errors:
Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...
ERROR: setup
CONFIG_MODULES: is not set when it should be.
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD: is not set when it should be.
This is a server
On 27/11/13 12:22, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2013/11/27 Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com
mailto:chrisstankev...@gmail.com
Hello,
Portage recently told me this:
* You need to add kmod-static-nodes to the sysinit runlevel for
* kernel modules to have required
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just a question...
Can I replace module-init-tools with kmod and stay with udev-171-r10 for the
time being?
Asked another way - is kmod fully supported by older releases of udev like
171-r10?
If you
Hello,
Portage recently told me this:
* You need to add kmod-static-nodes to the sysinit runlevel for
* kernel modules to have required static nodes!
* Run this command:
* rc-update add kmod-static-nodes sysinit
Will you please help me parse this statement?
Interpretation A:
* You need
2013/11/27 Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com
Hello,
Portage recently told me this:
* You need to add kmod-static-nodes to the sysinit runlevel for
* kernel modules to have required static nodes!
* Run this command:
* rc-update add kmod-static-nodes sysinit
Will you please
udev-181 merge is blocked because :
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
(sys-apps/module-init-tools is blocking sys-apps/kmod-7)
[blocks B ] sys-apps/kmod (sys-apps/kmod is blocking
sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.16-r1)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot
* Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com [120406 12:16]:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
* Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com [120406 11:40]:
[..]
To me it looks safe to emerge -C kmod and then emerge
module-init-tools if you want to go that way. I'd do
On 2013-03-17 2:17 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:46:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Also, should I manually fix the blockers:
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
(sys-apps/module-init-tools is blocking sys-apps/kmod-12-r1)
[blocks B ] sys-apps
When trying to build zfs-kmod against a a 3.13.[0|1|2] kernel, spl works
fine, but zfs fails. It looks like the issue is that the configure script
isn't doing quite the right check for bdi_setup_and_register, so
HAVE_BDI_SETUP_AND_REGISTER doesn't get defined, and then there's a
mismatch
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 27.01.2013 03:24, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Hi list!
Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and keep
sys-apps
deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and keep
sys-apps/module-init-tools, does udev still load modules or is kmod a
required flag for that?
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think so. The git repository has not a
single instance of the strings modprobe or insmod, apparently the
only way to load
=-static-libs
1,405 kB [ebuild N ] dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.28 USE=crypt
-debug -python -static-libs 3,356 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE=tools zlib -debug -doc
-lzma -static-libs 1,246 kB
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-197-r3 [171-r9] USE=acl%* kmod%*
openrc%* -doc% -gudev
USE=crypt
-debug -python -static-libs 3,356 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE=tools zlib -debug -doc
-lzma -static-libs 1,246 kB
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-197-r3 [171-r9] USE=acl%* kmod%*
openrc%* -doc% -gudev -hwdb -introspection -keymap (-selinux)
-static-libs
Am 27.01.2013 03:24, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Hi list!
Quick question: If I deactivate the kmod use flag in udev and keep
sys-apps/module-init-tools, does udev still load modules or is kmod a
required flag
On 24-Mar-13 18:39, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
BTW why should kmod depend on kernel-sources? Or even better, why
should be kmod installed, if I have static (non-modular) kernel?
Because your use case is not standard. The normal situation for users
with kmod installed (and you have already
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24-Mar-13 18:39, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
BTW why should kmod depend on kernel-sources? Or even better, why
should be kmod installed, if I have static (non-modular) kernel?
Because your use case is not standard
. There is talk on the gentoo-dev
list that mod-utils will be replaced by virtual/mod-utils which will
default to kmod (required to build udev-181). Note that mod-utils and
kmod are mutually exclusive. That should be taken care of in the
ebuilds, but I'll monitor the situation. I may have to modify the setup
, then zfs-kmod. But that's because zfs-kmod requires a
complete built spl.
Interesting, I have --jobs and portage doesn't try t build spl
and zfs-kmod in parallel, it always completes spl first.
--
Neil Bothwick
If the cops arrest a mime, do they tell her she has the right to remain
silent
-apps/systemd-206-r3::gentoo (Change USE: +kmod)
virtual/udev-206-r2::gentoo (Change USE: -kmod)
Adding -kmod to the USE list gets 54 pkgs, incl systemd ,
which I've masked in package.mask with sys-fs/systemd.
--
,,
SUPPORT
to emerge kvm-kmod, it is said
to have been masked, so i unmasked it. but while compiling, kvm-kmod
failed with an error message like:
cannot file arch/x86/kvm/trace.h file
Masked packages are usually masked for a reason. I would check on google
and then the gentoo bugzilla and see
Am 25.07.2012 23:59, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Make sure sys-apps/kmod is installed.
It is and was.
Thanks, Stefan
Where is module-init-tools-3.16-r2?
My system wants to upgrade it and it is mark stable but I can not download it
at all.
I know kmod is going to replace it eventually but it is not mark stable yet.
--
Joseph
130309 Philip Webb wrote:
130309 »Q« wrote:
130309 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg
telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked
to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it.
When I did so (both
managed /usr partition, is it now safe to comment
out my udev masks and update udev, with a reasonable expectation that
doing so won't break my boot ability?
Also, should I manually fix the blockers:
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools (sys-apps/module-init-tools is
blocking sys-apps/kmod
Hmmm...
Do I need (I don't think so) the kmod USE flag set for eudev and
virtual/udev?
I have kernel modules disabled on this system.
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libgpg-error-1.10 USE=nls -common-lisp
-static-libs 429 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.5.0-r2 USE=-static-libs 1,405 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.28 USE=crypt -debug -python
-static-libs 3,356 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE=tools
Hi. I am having problems installing zfs-kmod on my new kernel
5.4.69. Originally I got this:
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
sys-fs/zfs-kmod:0
(sys-fs/zfs-kmod-2.0.0_rc3:0/0
hi,
i cannot access my computer now, so i can only tell you what i remember.
i am using gentoo amd64, and the portage is updated. the kernel have
kvm modules compiled. when i was trying to emerge kvm-kmod, it is said
to have been masked, so i unmasked it. but while compiling, kvm-kmod
failed
regards,
Hinnerk
On 19.03.2012 16:47, Paul Hartman wrote:
udev-181 merge is blocked because :
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
(sys-apps/module-init-tools is blocking sys-apps/kmod-7) [blocks
B ] sys-apps/kmod (sys-apps/kmod is blocking
sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.16-r1
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:37:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
For anybody who's reading this thread... you *MUST* use the tools
flag with kmod in order to get basic stuff like a man page, lsmod, etc.
The tools flag is enabled by default in the kmod ebuild, so only those who
choose to deliberately
130309 »Q« wrote:
130309 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg
telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked
to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it.
When I did so (both), Nvidia wouldn't start, even
-0 0 kB
[ebuild R] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE=tools zlib -debug -doc -lzma
-static-libs KERNEL=(linux%*) 0 kB
Why in the heavens name should be gentoo-sources pulled in as
dependency of whatever?
As a dependency of virtual-sources, which is probably pulled in by kmod.
Adding --tree
On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:53:42 -0400,
Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:28 AM John Covici wrote:
> >
> > Hi. I am having problems installing zfs-kmod on my new kernel
> > 5.4.69. Originally I got this:
> >
> > !!! Multiple package instances wi
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:28 AM John Covici wrote:
>
> Hi. I am having problems installing zfs-kmod on my new kernel
> 5.4.69. Originally I got this:
>
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph
On 2013-03-17, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-03-17 2:17 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:46:39 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Also, should I manually fix the blockers:
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
(sys-apps/module-init-tools is blocking sys-apps/kmod-12
/var/tmp/portage/sys-kernel/spl-/work/spl-
./copy-builtin /usr/src/linux)
root # (cd /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/zfs-kmod-/work/zfs-kmod-/
./copy-builtin /usr/src/linux)
After this, you just need to edit the kernel config to enable CONFIG_SPL
and CONFIG_ZFS and emerge the zfs binaries
Is this right?
# eix udev
...
[U] sys-fs/udev
Available versions: 208-r1^t 212-r1^t ~213^t **^t {acl doc +firmware-loader gudev
introspection +kmod selinux static-libs ABI_MIPS=n32 n64 o32 ABI_X86=32 64
x32}
Installed versions: 208^t{tbz2}(03:30:13 PM 12/08/2013)(acl
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:07:45 -0500
Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg
telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked
to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it.
When I did so (both), Nvidia wouldn't
a cron daemon or a system logger for that
reason, so they won't include kernel sources.
AFAICT stage3 archives include everything of @system.
virtual/dev-manager usually pulls in udev, which might pull in kmod
(depending on USE flags) and virtual/modutils is part of system, which
by default uses
everything of @system.
They don't. That's why you have to satisfy some virtuals manually at
install time.
virtual/dev-manager usually pulls in udev, which might pull in kmod
(depending on USE flags) and virtual/modutils is part of system, which
by default uses kmod.
So kmod is part of system
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:58:29 +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote:
I havent't had any failed builds that were related to the --jobs
option. The only exception is when rebuilding my kernel modules. I
have to build spl first, then zfs-kmod. But that's because zfs-kmod
requires a complete built
Am 26.03.2013 22:40, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:58:29 +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote:
I havent't had any failed builds that were related to the --jobs
option. The only exception is when rebuilding my kernel modules. I
have to build spl first, then zfs-kmod. But that's
- pykde4-4.11.0 - USE=script.
(4) udisks - USE=gudev.
(5) then I see :
sys-apps/systemd-206-r3::gentoo (Change USE: +kmod)
virtual/udev-206-r2::gentoo (Change USE: -kmod)
Adding -kmod to the USE list gets 54 pkgs, incl systemd ,
which I've masked in package.mask with sys-fs/systemd
) udisks - USE=gudev.
(5) then I see :
sys-apps/systemd-206-r3::gentoo (Change USE: +kmod)
virtual/udev-206-r2::gentoo (Change USE: -kmod)
Adding -kmod to the USE list gets 54 pkgs, incl systemd ,
which I've masked in package.mask with sys-fs/systemd.
It gets more complex
What does it mean and how can I get rid of it?
By creating the missing file :)
Right, and if he is using monolitic kernel with CONFIG_MODULES=n in
kernel /usr/src/linux/.config,
with no modules at all, then he should remove 'kmod-static-nodes' init
script from the runlevels to silence
On 12/23/2009 8:14 PM, Xi Shen wrote:
hi,
i cannot access my computer now, so i can only tell you what i remember.
i am using gentoo amd64, and the portage is updated. the kernel have
kvm modules compiled. when i was trying to emerge kvm-kmod, it is said
to have been masked, so i unmasked
429 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.5.0-r2 USE=-static-libs 1,405 kB
[ebuild N ] dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.28 USE=crypt -debug -python
-static-libs 3,356 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE=tools zlib -debug -doc -lzma
-static-libs 1,246 kB
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-197-r3
Ok, I am prepping for the udev update this weekend, getting everything
updated that doesn't pull in the udev updates.
First thing I did was to eliminate the module-init-toolskmod Blocker:
emerge -C module-init-tools %% emerge kmod
and noted the following warnings/errors:
Checking
%% emerge kmod
and noted the following warnings/errors:
Checking for suitable kernel configuration options...
ERROR: setup
CONFIG_MODULES:is not set when it should be.
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD: is not set when it should be.
This is a server, and I do not WANT loadable modules
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:07:31 -0800, Scott Ellis wrote:
When trying to build zfs-kmod against a a 3.13.[0|1|2] kernel, spl works
fine, but zfs fails. It looks like the issue is that the configure
script isn't doing quite the right check for bdi_setup_and_register, so
Ah, I missed that bug report. Thanks for the pointer (and the workaround).
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:07:31 -0800, Scott Ellis wrote:
When trying to build zfs-kmod against a a 3.13.[0|1|2] kernel, spl works
fine, but zfs
On Thursday, 12 April 2018 22:47:31 BST Dave Trombley wrote:
> This has been broken for almost two years; the signature format switched to
> PKCS#7 and modinfo doesn't support it. It's not as simple as just
> patching kmod because evidently the kernel change regressed or dis
, and the portage is updated. the kernel have
kvm modules compiled. when i was trying to emerge kvm-kmod, it is said
to have been masked, so i unmasked it. but while compiling, kvm-kmod
failed with an error message like:
cannot file arch/x86/kvm/trace.h file
Masked packages are usually masked
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
SNIP
So it looks like just udev-182-r2 depends upon it.
Sorry for the misinformation.
Todd
Not a problem.
So this problem is really just for folks running ~amd64 as all this
new udev stuff as well as kmod aren't marked
Am 26.07.2012 00:15, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.07.2012 23:59, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Make sure sys-apps/kmod is installed.
It is and was.
my fault ...
I compiled modules for 3.5.0-gentoo, forgot about updating
GRUB2-config, and booted 3.5.0 (from git-sources), which lacked
Florian Philipp wrote:
Is it really a drop-in? I was under the impression that for example
`modprobe -l` is not implemented (mentioned in a comment on the eudev
fork on LWN). I guess that's outdated as well.
I'm using kmod's modprobe, and there is *no* -l option.
-Matt
On 24-Mar-13 17:46, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:26:03 +0100, Jarry wrote:
[ebuild N ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.7.10:3.7.10 USE=-build
-deblob -symlink 68,335 kB
[ebuild N ] virtual/linux-sources-0 0 kB
[ebuild R] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE=tools zlib -debug
package.provided again, and again... BTW why
should kmod depend on kernel-sources? Or even better, why should be
kmod installed, if I have static (non-modular) kernel?
Because your use case is not standard. The normal situation for users
with kmod installed (and you have already kmod installed, since
What is the meaning of this change?
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-212-r1 [208] USE=acl firmware-loader gudev
introspection kmod -doc (-selinux) -static-libs (-openrc%*) 2,660 kB
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 08/16/2014 11:56 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
* unmerge modutils
* emerge kmod, with the tools USE flag.
Before I screw anything up, does this sound reasonable?
Yes, that's what I did and all's well.
But *don't* do it until you return from your trip, lest the spirit
of desktop environments
modules. I have to build
spl first, then zfs-kmod. But that's because zfs-kmod requires a
complete built spl.
Interesting, I have --jobs and portage doesn't try t build spl
and zfs-kmod in parallel, it always completes spl first.
Interesting. Maybe a problem with module-rebuild? I
, with strange Blockers referencing udev-186???
[ebuild U #] sys-fs/udev-200 [171-r10]
USE="acl%* firmware-loader%* kmod%* openrc%* -doc% -gudev -hwdb
-introspection -keymap (-selinux) -static-libs%
(-action_modeswitch%) (-build%) (-debug%) (-edd%) (-e
On 14/06/2014 15:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
Is this right?
# eix udev
...
[U] sys-fs/udev
Available versions: 208-r1^t 212-r1^t ~213^t **^t {acl doc
+firmware-loader gudev introspection +kmod selinux static-libs
ABI_MIPS=n32 n64 o32 ABI_X86=32 64 x32}
Installed versions: 208^t
-3.16-r1 USE=-static 233 kB
[blocks B ] sys-apps/module-init-tools
(sys-apps/module-init-tools is blocking sys-apps/kmod-7)
[blocks B ] sys-apps/kmod (sys-apps/kmod is blocking
sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.16-r1)
Total: 1 package (1 new), Size of downloads: 233 kB
Conflict: 2 blocks (2
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Xi Shen davidshe...@googlemail.com wrote:
hi,
i cannot access my computer now, so i can only tell you what i remember.
i am using gentoo amd64, and the portage is updated. the kernel have
kvm modules compiled. when i was trying to emerge kvm-kmod, it is said
On 3/31/2011 4:31 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
The specific modules you mentioned are included in your kernel already,
assuming you are using at least a 2.6.34 kernel. You'll still want to
install open-vm-tools, which installs the other modules via
open-vm-tools-kmod, like vsock and vmci, plus
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:02:02 -0600
»Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:22:23 -0500
Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
It looks as if the change needs a 'news' msg.
If it turns out to be solved by the tools flag for kmod, I gotta
disagree. I also use -* , but I don't
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 03:07:01AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
It was actually modutils that was masked out and replaced with
modutils. This had not kicked in yet on the install image I was using
on the netbook. I had to unmerge virtual/modutils and modutils, then I
was able to emerge kmod
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 09:33:16AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:37:05 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
For anybody who's reading this thread... you *MUST* use the tools
flag with kmod in order to get basic stuff like a man page, lsmod, etc.
The tools flag is enabled
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 17:26:03 +0100, Jarry wrote:
[ebuild N ] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.7.10:3.7.10 USE=-build
-deblob -symlink 68,335 kB
[ebuild N ] virtual/linux-sources-0 0 kB
[ebuild R] sys-apps/kmod-12-r1 USE=tools zlib -debug -doc -lzma
-static-libs KERNEL=(linux
to the --jobs option.
The only exception is when rebuilding my kernel modules. I have to build
spl first, then zfs-kmod. But that's because zfs-kmod requires a
complete built spl.
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Do you really need to copy the files into the kernel tree?
No, you don't need to do that.
which seems to pull in the daemon and the kmod so wouldn't the zfs-kmod
ebuild build against the current kernel and drop in the modules
directory all by itself much like any
how did you unmask zfs?
Here are mine:
$ grep -r zfs /etc/portage
/etc/portage/sets/zfs:sys-fs/zfs
/etc/portage/sets/zfs:sys-fs/zfs-kmod
/etc/portage/package.keywords/zfs:=sys-fs/zfs-kmod-0.7.1 ~amd64
/etc/portage/package.keywords/zfs:=sys-fs/zfs-0.7.1 ~amd64
$ grep -r spl /etc/portage
/etc/portag
not as simple as just
>> patching kmod because evidently the kernel change regressed or disrespected
>> the relevent structure in the modules in a way that makes it impossible for
>> kmod to even make sense of. Details here:
>> https://github.com/coreos/bugs/issues/1054
>
Hello, list!
I want to deploy some Gentoo-based VMs on VMware. From portage-search,
I see some 'tools' related to VMware, namely:
* vmware-tools
* open-vm-tools
* open-vm-tools-kmod
What are the differences? And which one should I use if I want to use
VMware's PVSCSI and VMXNET?
Thank you
Am 27.01.2013 12:33, schrieb Matthias Hanft:
Florian Philipp wrote:
Is it really a drop-in? I was under the impression that for example
`modprobe -l` is not implemented (mentioned in a comment on the eudev
fork on LWN). I guess that's outdated as well.
I'm using kmod's modprobe, and there
Doing my usual Saturday system update, I saw a prominent msg
telling me that 'module-init-tools' has been masked
to use 'kmod' or 'modutils' -- the msgs vary -- to replace it.
When I did so (both), Nvidia wouldn't start, even after remerging it.
Back with 'module-init-tools' -- now
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 21:22:23 -0500
Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
It looks as if the change needs a 'news' msg.
If it turns out to be solved by the tools flag for kmod, I gotta
disagree. I also use -* , but I don't think we should get news items
whenever that's going to break something
: no wildcards are allowed, so whenever new sorces
come I'll have to edit package.provided again, and again... BTW why
should kmod depend on kernel-sources? Or even better, why should be
kmod installed, if I have static (non-modular) kernel?
Because your use case is not standard. The normal
s, to have their own
>> ZFS-in-kernel system available, and that it would also be possible to
>> accomplish this via an overlay...
> sys-fs/zfs-kmod
I would be using this on a server, so, for security reasons, no module
support.
uot;${CXXFLAGS} -ggdb"
FEATURES="${FEATURES} splitdebug compressdebug nostrip"
FEATURES="${FEATURES} installsources"
/etc/portage/ $ cat package.env/sys-apps/kpci
sys-apps/kmod debugsyms installsources
sys-apps/pciutils debugsyms instal
Heads up for anyone trying this. Filesystem layout for kernel modules
has changed, I ended up with left-over modules from when
downgrading, needs manual clean-up. Would maybe be a good idea to update
the ebuilds for the non-git ebuilds to either the new layout or to clean
up the
if you have 2.6.31 and want to use kvm-88-r1, kvm-kmod-88-r1 is not
required and you can use the in kernel modules.
if they release kvm-devel-89 for example, it may have newer kvm-kmod code than
what is bundled in the kernel.
Daniel,
thanks for your help in this matter. i have linux-2.6.31
:
* vmware-tools
* open-vm-tools
* open-vm-tools-kmod
What are the differences? And which one should I use if I want to use
VMware's PVSCSI and VMXNET?
As I understand things, open-vm-tools is just an open-source version of
vmware-tools, but uses the same code base and is managed by VMWare
googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me
find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from udev to eudev.
Step 1)
keyword sys-fs/eudev-1_beta2-r2
Step 2)
ensure that kmod and openrc and -modutils USE flags are set (at
least for sys-fs/eudev). tools flag needs
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
