This is happening now in #gimp-development
--xsdg
Sven Neumann escribió:
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 19:38 +0200, Alexia Death wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011
at 7:23 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote: > > LightningIsMyName wrote:
> >> said on IRC that she can't point a domain at that adress so we really > >>
Making sure that this address works before I send a long email; sorry
for the noise
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
This email won't really address your points, but as a GIMP dev-let who
is both new (wrote my first big patch a few weeks ago) and old (been
hanging around #gimp for 5+ years), I think I can add an interesting
perspective here.
First, a large part of the learning curve is figuring out GIMP's
de
The subject and patch are pretty self-explanatory. Ran into this while
trying to do pointer arithmetic with these macros.
--xsdg
>From 0ba4f676e3de80233b7ab184b11e527b61ab6158 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omari Stephens
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:49:08 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add miss
On 12/08/2010 10:35 PM, Jan Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the best GIMP tools for sharpening?
For sharpening _what_? The steps you would take when sharpening a photo
for the web are different than what you'd do when sharpening a photo for
print. And there are all sorts of artistic reasons to
On 05/09/2010 01:02 AM, Hades wrote:
> Is there anyone who likes writing an java api to gimp?so the J2EE can
> use the GIMP JAVA API perform graphic
I can pretty much tell you now that this isn't going to happen.
Googling for "java graphics manipulation" provides some leads that you
might try fol
On 04/21/2010 11:58 AM, Oliver Bandel wrote:
> Zitat von "Tor Lillqvist":
>
>>> The test
>>>if( template )
>>> makes only sense, if you can be sure that uninitialzed values
>>> will definitelky be NULL.
>>
>> You must have missed the g_return_val_if_fail (! template ||
>> GIMP_IS_CONTEXT (templ
It seems like running configure with --enable-debug should also disable
optimization; otherwise you end up with a bunch of magically inlined or
optimized-out function calls, optimized-out variables, and confusing
execution order.
Thoughts?
--xsdg
___
Attached. Seems pretty straightforward.
--xsdg
>From 75abc6e31331137c643d09ac4db7b508a4406327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omari Stephens
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:56:23 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix build in case where objdir and srcdir differ
The build currently doesn't work when t
On 04/08/2010 10:18 AM, Oleg Blazhyievskyi wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
> exif, and so on and it's also quite stable, but there is one bug it
> doesn't remember single window mode settings, so you have activate this
> setting every time when you restarting gimp
This hasn't been implemented yet; it is not
Try running "ldd `which gimp-2.7`" on both machines. I would imagine
there's a dependency issue. Specifically, I'd wonder about your
versions of X11 and GTK
--xsdg
On 03/31/2010 07:10 AM, Olivier wrote:
> The problem I encounter is not with the git version, but with my use of
> it. Explanatio
On 03/22/2010 12:44 PM, peter sikking wrote:
> ehm guys,
>
> gui.gimp.org is down, or rather, serving up perfectly empty pages.
It's an experiment in minimalism. How does the blank page make you _feel_?
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-devel
On 03/13/2010 02:41 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> Graeme Gill wrote:
>> The bottom line is that it depends on your purpose. If you
>> have a particular reason to specify device dependent colors,
>> then you deliberately don't want to tag the file with a profile.
>
> This case worries me a bit. Hope you can e
On 03/06/2010 12:58 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:34 +0000, Omari Stephens wrote:
>
>> Finally, to respond to your question on the bug, we need some way to
>> embed an actual sRGB profile into an image.
>
> Can't we just embed t
On 03/04/2010 09:01 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:49 +0000, Omari Stephens wrote:
>> Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
>> to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
>> issu
2
--xsdg
>From 3c76fe59f903206fed2322371359fe700614663b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Omari Stephens
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:12:40 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add sRGBv2 profiles to the GIMP distribution
Downloaded from http://www.color.org/srgbprofiles.xalter
---
configure.ac |1 +
On 03/04/2010 02:13 PM, Jason Simanek wrote:
>
> On 03/04/2010 02:14 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> The point of the current behavior is that you need to make an assumption
>> if no profile is attached to an image. Otherwise you could not even
>> display this image. Without a color profile or an assump
On 02/28/2010 02:43 PM, lloyd konneker wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
> Here is proposed addition for plug-ins/gimpmodule.c in pygimp_main()
> that I have lightly tested. Note it raises a warning (Python prints
> warning on stderr once, on the second call), not an exception. Note it
> compiles with a C90
On 02/12/2010 10:12 PM, Christopher Curtis wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, yahvuu wrote:
>
>> here are some diagrams depicting selected configurations for colormanagement:
>> http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/dataflow.png
>
> What happens in a multi-head setup when I maximize an
On 02/12/2010 05:36 PM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 06:27 PM, Omari Stephens wrote:
>> On 02/12/2010 04:55 PM, yahvuu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> here are some diagrams depicting selected configurations for
>>> colormanagement:
>>>
On 02/12/2010 04:55 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here are some diagrams depicting selected configurations for colormanagement:
> http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/dataflow.png
I believe number 1 is incorrect:
All images in GIMP will have a color profile. This will either be the
implicit s
;> On 02/07/2010 04:55 AM, Omari Stephens wrote:
>> "1) When an image is opened with no associated color profile, we assume
>> that it is encoded in sRGB space."
>>
>> I don't think we should assume that, do you have an example use case
>> where that is
On 02/08/2010 07:41 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:
>
> Omari Stephens wrote:
>> For one, as Sven pointed out, we can't ship the AdobeRGB color profile.
>> This means that even if we know it _should_ be AdobeRGB, the user will
>> need to take some action either to make tha
On 02/08/2010 01:39 AM, Graeme Gill wrote:
> Omari Stephens wrote:
>> Obviously, options for both of these things are "prompt the user." It seems
>> like there
>> should be better alternatives, but I'm not sure what they might be.
>> guiguru?
o see more options at the bottom of the "Color Management"
configuration pane, your help would be appreciated.
(more comments inline)
On 02/07/2010 12:36 PM, yahvuu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Omari Stephens wrote:
>> Hi, all
>>
>> I wrote up a quick spec for how GIM
ome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608961
Author: Omari Stephens
Version: 1
Date:3 February 2010
This spec is intended to define GIMP's color profile management behavior as
pertains to the opening and exporting of image files. How this is achieved or
implemented, and especially the UI and UX co
On 02/04/2010 02:42 PM, Cristian Secară wrote:
> In the dialog windows that opens on Image -> Image Properties the first
> item is "Pixel dimensions:".
>
> In my opinion this is incorrect (it sounds like it were about the
> dimensions of a physical pixel). I think it should be "Image
> dimensions"
On 01/24/2010 08:29 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
> On Sunday 24 January 2010 01:35:20 am Omari Stephens wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
>> After a bit more thinking, it occurs to me that it makes no sense for us
>> to not have a a copy of the working-space color profile, if we want to
>&g
On 01/24/2010 09:03 AM, Omari Stephens wrote:
> On 01/24/2010 08:31 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Omari Stephens wrote:
>>>> I had naively signed up for the "work on color management" job. That
>>>> said, do you happen to know where the sRGB thing
On 01/24/2010 08:31 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Omari Stephens wrote:
>>> I had naively signed up for the "work on color management" job. That
>>> said, do you happen to know where the sRGB thingie is added by default?
>>> (if not, I can probably f
On 01/24/2010 07:26 AM, Omari Stephens wrote:
> On 01/23/2010 08:04 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Right now we don't have a clearly defined color management strategy for
>> GIMP.
>>
>> I would like us to settle a minimal color management
On 01/23/2010 08:04 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Hi
>
> Right now we don't have a clearly defined color management strategy for
> GIMP.
>
> I would like us to settle a minimal color management strategy for GIMP
> so that we can fix some inconsistencies in our color management, in
> particular for
On 01/22/2010 05:22 AM, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
> 2. I'm using multi-window mode in 2.7. I'm using GNOME and the
> Workspace Switcher with 12 workspaces in two rows. I start 2.7 in one
> workspace, then switch to another, then back to the GIMP workspace. The
> toolbox and docks
On 12/31/2009 10:57 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
> You are free to start working on it today. GEGL needs more contributors
> and there is also a lot that can be done in GIMP today working towards
> the goal of better GEGL integration.
As the GEGL website is down, is there somewhere folk
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
> Ismael:
> I don't know the official position about this, but I think that the
> Wilber image you used looks pretty dated. I'd use the Tango version or
> the icon for Mac that Jimmac designed.
> They look much better and as far as I could see, the Tango version is
> bein
photoco...@gmail.com wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
> As you may see the idea is not to replace the Export dialog, but to offer a
> handy option from the Save dialog, to simultaneously export , with same name
> and in the same directory in other file formats
Wouldn't this be fairly straightforward to do a
Martin Nordholts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are making pretty good progress towards GIMP 2.8 which has turned
> into an "everything but GEGL" release. I think it would make sense to
> also go for a single-window mode in 2.8 and not 2.10 as originally
> planned.
::snip? SNIP!::
Hi, all.
I might be daft,
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 11:48 +0200, gg wrote:
>
>> I added a comment to a png image and pressed Save. I was averted to the
>> fact it failed by the fact it was too quick (a fairly large file).
>>
>> On repeating the save to see what happened I caught a glimpse of a
UI powers that be: any ideas/status on this?
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
The spec is here:
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Save_%2B_export_specification#exporting_files
Quick version:
The default export path needs a settings switch for whether the original file
path (number 3) is higher-priority than the most-recently-used paths (numbers 1
and 2). This would support t
Freddy wrote:
>> Alec Burgess (bura...@gmail.com) wrote (in part) (on 2009-06-19 at 05:45):
>> Have you considered ImageMagik? I'm not well-qualified at either
>> scripting Gimp nor anything but simplest tasks in ImageMagik (just lurk
>> on the IM-list) but the tasks you describe *might* be poss
kevin wrote:
> I have been using GIMP for a few months now and there is a feature that
> I have wanted to have and think about every time I open up GIMP.
>
> The feature is mainly for the possibility of having "templates". The
> idea is that you can place a layer that is a link to a certain ima
Robert Krawitz wrote:
>Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 20:56:25 +
>From: Omari Stephens
>
>Omari Stephens wrote:
>
>Mockup is here:
>http://ocaml.xvm.mit.edu/~xsdg/stuff/gimp/hsl-doublecone.png
>
>Note that when I mention "HSL" below,
Hal V. Engel wrote:
> On Sunday 31 May 2009 01:56:25 pm Omari Stephens wrote:
>> his also makes sense in terms of the colors that humans can perceive — we
>> can more-easily perceive differences in highly-saturated colors than we can
>> differences in mostly-white swatches
Omari Stephens wrote:
> Robert Krawitz wrote:
>>From: Christian
>>Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:53:43 +0200
>>
>>Hi Michael
>>
>>The HSL is one of the best color models. The colors are symmetrical
>>ordered.
>>
>>Adva
Robert Krawitz wrote:
>From: Christian
>Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:53:43 +0200
>
>Hi Michael
>
>The HSL is one of the best color models. The colors are symmetrical
>ordered.
>
>Advantages
>1. symmetrical
>2. color values are not rounded (you have more colors than
gg wrote:
> Omari Stephens wrote:
>> Hi, all
>>
>> I'm working on a patch which shifts the rotation grid so that a grid
>> intersection always falls on the center of rotation. The simple
>> use-case for this functionality is when doing a correctiv
Hi, all
I'm working on a patch which shifts the rotation grid so that a grid
intersection always falls on the center of rotation. The simple use-case for
this functionality is when doing a corrective rotation in a photo with a clear
horizontal or vertical object. Maintaining an intersection o
Stephen DeLear wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
First off, just to be clear, what OS are you on? The vast majority of gimp
users are Linux/some-form-of-UNIX users, so that tends to be what we (or, at
least, I) assume. The issues you're facing sound like you might be using a
less-tested configuration, th
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:31 -0700, vabijou2 wrote:
::snip? SNIP!::
>> As far as real estate on
>> the bottom of the layers dialog goes, I would eliminate the raise/lower
>> layer buttons I don't ever use them since it is easier to drag the
>> layer itself to th
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 07:25 -0400, Paka wrote:
>
>> the opensuse team that is maintaining gimp/ufraw does not believe that
>> exif data is important to the project and do not include support for
>> exif.
>
> Easy enough to copy the plug-in binary from a compatible
Jim Sabatke wrote:
> Bill Skaggs wrote:
>> Jim Sabatke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It seems that in 2.4.6 that exif data are missing when saving as a
>>> compressed jpg. They are not missing on jpgs with no compression.
>> There is no such thing as a jpg with no compression, so it is pretty
>>
Zhang Junbo wrote:
> I apologize for my precipitancy. I'm sorry.
Bah; no worries. It's certainly a valid concern.
Cheers,
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce/browse_thread/thread/9fa88f31aa401f70
--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Zhang Junbo wrote:
> Is today April 1 ?
>
>
> On Mon Mar 31 08:43:55 PDT 2008, Alexandre Prokoudine
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Deadline for student applications submission is officially extended by
>> one week. The new deadline for student applications is Monday, April
>> 7, 2008. Timeline in FAQ is
Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is unavoidable on a mailing-list. Not everyone receives the mails
> at the same time and there is no way you can know if anyone else has
> already responded to the mail.
I can see how that would be the case if the responses were temporally close to
each other.
Hi, all
It seems counterproductive that Rafael Mesquita received three separate
responses that started off pretty identically (even though they included unique
and useful information). I'd like to offer the suggestion that, when
responding
to a project proposal sent to the ML, that the respon
57 matches
Mail list logo
