On 4 Feb, Raphael Quinet wrote:
I wouldn't be too sure about that. On a system that I was previously
administering (students' network at the university), I have seen some
users that were using /var/tmp or /tmp to store their applications
while they were logged in, and deleted the stuff
On 4 Feb, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I'm constantly finding myself looking for tools. I know that they are
there, but I have to stop and look closer at almost every single tool.
There are simply too many tools (some of them could well be combined),
and the icons look very much the same
Hiho!
I think it's time to remove that useless pencil before the release
of the magic version 1.2. Did anyone use it in the last time?
It contains no functionality that paintbrush doesn't have except of
hard edges (anyone needing that "feature"?)...
Anyway: This is up for discussion on
Hi developers,
At the moment we have got 2 Pathtools in GIMP. One which is called
Bezierselect in the Toolbox but has a Path dialog
(in the Layers/Channels dialog???) and another one called Path tool.
The latter works a lot nicer IMHO but I haven't managed yet to
transform a path into a
On 4 Feb, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
What does Photoshop do?
What does that matter?
Photoshop is the most used graphicstool out there and it makes sense
to have a closer look on their behaviour especially in the UI sector.
Anyway, even if books do now say that Fill fills with the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pathtool?
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:03:44 +0100 (CET)
Which one should we keep? Or better: should we
merge it into one Tool which works nicely AND has a support dialog?
I hope them to be merged into one tool with support dialog.
Anyway, the dialog window
I think it's time to remove that useless pencil before the release
of the magic version 1.2. Did anyone use it in the last time?
It contains no functionality that paintbrush doesn't have except of
hard edges (anyone needing that "feature"?)...
It is a very important feature, believe me!
Hi,
Daniel, please, do you follow the discussions on this list?
At the moment we have got 2 Pathtools in GIMP. One which is called
Bezierselect in the Toolbox but has a Path dialog
(in the Layers/Channels dialog???) and another one called Path tool.
The latter works a lot nicer IMHO
On 5 Feb, FUJITA Yuji wrote:
Which one should we keep? Or better: should we
merge it into one Tool which works nicely AND has a support dialog?
I hope them to be merged into one tool with support dialog.
Anyway, the dialog window title should be something like
"Layers, Channels and
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote:
It is a very important feature, believe me!
It's your right to consider it useful, I don't and won't believe you...
But the pencil can easily
be merged with the Paintbrush by adding a "Hard Edges" option.
Yes, if you appreciate. But the makes the eraser
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote:
It works much better now (/me thanks Kelly).
"much" is a bit too much... :)
It definitely works better but the current behaviour isn't acceptable
for the release anyway
Well, if you don't see the advantages of a more configurable toolbox
layout, I
On 5 Feb, SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro wrote:
I'm all for removing the Path Tool, the Xinput Airbrush and and
merging Pencil and Paintbrush. If I counted correctly this would
reduce the number of tools to 24. This is a perfect number of tools
since 24 % [2|3|4] == 0 which means we always get a nicely
On 5 Feb, Sven Neumann wrote:
Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the
Paths dialog?
No, not yet, but I'll have a closer look on this.
A number of new bugs would certainly be introduced by
doing so. That's why I say: It's too late!
Every line of code
I'm all for removing the Path Tool, the Xinput Airbrush and and merging
Pencil and Paintbrush. If I counted correctly this would reduce the
number of tools to 24. This is a perfect number of tools since
24 % [2|3|4] == 0 which means we always get a nicely layed out toolbox.
core and
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:46:14PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the
Paths dialog? A number of new bugs would certainly be introduced by doing
so. That's why I say: It's too late!
Agreed. Broken stuff with no-one working on it is
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 10:01:04AM +0100, Raphael Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you, Mark. Knowing the difference between tools and
plug-ins is rather important, but is not easy for the beginner who has
several dialogs open and is not familiar with all of them. If the
The
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 02:59:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Repeat Last" will repeat the last plug-in. Since menus do not provide
feedback of wether an entry is a plug-in or "built-in" (I think it
would even be wrong to do so), you have to know this, which is not
easy for
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Garry R. Osgood wrote:
Tom Rathborne wrote:
I just noticed this new CVS entry:
Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* app/global_edit.c: edit_fill with foreground, not background.
snipped...
Indeed, some of the 1.2 -
Sven Neumann wrote:
snipped...
I'm all for removing the Path Tool,
Agreed: In my opinion, there is just too much work to integrate
for March 31 (56 days away and counting).
the Xinput Airbrush
Agreed: I've just got Wacom Intuos working with GTK+/GDK on SGI,
and on this platform using the
I found also that app/gimpui.c and app/gimpunit.c contain partially the
same contents as libgimp/gimpui.c and libgimp/gimpunit.c
When I save pbm in GIMP it is not saved as pbm but as pnm.
Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:38:32 +0100, Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ok. I've just enabled automatic mirroring from the sourceforge cvs
back to the gimp cvs.
FWIW, I think this should be used sparingly. It is my belief that
we should try to move plugins into a separate package from the
I'd really like to see the setting for default brush reappear. So
much so that I'd do it myself.
Hows this fit with the freeze? I hate to violate the freeze, esp
since its been getting better. But I'm SO SICK OF THAT CALIGRAPHIC
BRUSH (10x10)! Comments?
Seth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
In ChangeLog :
Fri Jan 28 01:16:35 CET 2000 Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* PLUGIN_CVS: updated to give Kevin Turner write access to
the maze plug-in (therefore, the maze plug-in is no longer
managable within the gnome cvs server. If you have any
Hi,
Ok. I've just enabled automatic mirroring from the sourceforge cvs back
to the gimp cvs.
The file gimp/PLUGIN_CVS in the cvs tree controls which paths are mirrored
and which are not. If anything goes havoc just delete that file and the
script will stop doing anything.
At the
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:40:32 -0500, Zach Beane - MINT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Count this as a cry out against it. I suggest waiting for a logical
pause in development, such as the release of GIMP 1.2, to begin
making these not-insubstantial changes in source management.
My position is
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 05:29:48PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
[snip]
However, since the masses haven't cried out yet, I guess we can try and
see how it works in practise.
Count this as a cry out against it. I suggest waiting for a
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Raphael Quinet wrote:
My personal opinion: I'm all for using some of the GNOME things
(especially gnome-font, gtk-pixbuf and gnome-canvas) as long as they
do not have any dependencies on ORBit or other stuff that is difficult
to compile on non-Linux systems or stuff that
On Tue, 01 Feb 2000, Kelly Lynn Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNOME claims GIMP as part of GNOME because GIMP is better than any of
the existing GNOME apps. They're trying to piggyback on our success.
Personally, I think this is odious, but hey...
This statement is ridiculous. They are
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 07:07:37PM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 06:59:57PM -0500, Tom Rathborne wrote:
I just noticed this new CVS entry:
Fri Feb 4 18:27:16 CET 2000 Stanislav Brabec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* app/global_edit.c: edit_fill with
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000 11:45:16 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think it's time to remove that useless pencil before the release
of the magic version 1.2. Did anyone use it in the last time? It
contains no functionality that paintbrush doesn't have except of hard
edges (anyone needing that
My vote is for the merge of pencil and paintbrush. I don't see that
having a hard-edged paintbrush is really worthy of its own icon, though
it will need an option added in paintbrush. I don't know of anything
that utilizes pencil in PDB at this point, but maybe I'm mistaken? I
doubt removing
Thus spoke Shawn T . Amundson
Just wanted to let you guys know that I wrote up a story
on advogato.com you guys might want to read for a good
laugh:
http://advogato.com/
'Andover.Net and the deep pockets of Wilber the GIMP?'
Interesting story, and not really suprising. I heard some
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000 21:00:19 -0700 (MST), "Michael J. Hammel"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The last comment I saw under this story said that a $2K award was
given to "Wilbur the Gimp". Since Gimp has no non-profit (or for
profit) organization, who got that money? Just curious.
It goes to Yosh, who
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 12:44:36AM -0500, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000 21:00:19 -0700 (MST), "Michael J. Hammel"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The last comment I saw under this story said that a $2K award was
given to "Wilbur the Gimp". Since Gimp has no non-profit (or for
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:53:50PM -0500, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000 19:07:37 -0500, Zach Beane - MINT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Fill (by default Ctrl-.) has filled using the background colour in
the GIMP for as long as I can remember. I don't think it's a bug
[snip]
I
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 11:45:16AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiho!
I think it's time to remove that useless pencil before the release
of the magic version 1.2. Did anyone use it in the last time?
It contains no functionality that paintbrush doesn't have except of
hard edges
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:09:13PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
I think it's time to remove that useless pencil before the release
of the magic version 1.2. Did anyone use it in the last time?
It contains no functionality that paintbrush doesn't have except of
hard edges (anyone needing
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 01:28:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no
need to discuss which path tool should make it into 1.2, since there
is only one that is working.
It works, it may not have all the features that Simon desired but it's
nice nevertheless...
It doesnt work.
You wrote on Fre, 04 Feb 2000:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 12:48:50AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the menus were reorganized I am constantly guessing wether
"Repeat Last" will repeat my last action, the one before or not work
at all, since you can't tell from the menu anymore.
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:33:38 -0800
From: "Michael J. Hammel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm curious why any new plug-ins should be added to the core *at all*.
Gimp's distribution is fairly large as it is. Isn't it getting time to
limit additional plug-ins to the core distribution to
Michael J. Hammel spontaneously blurts out:
I'm curious why any new plug-ins should be added to the core *at all*.
Gimp's distribution is fairly large as it is. Isn't it getting time to
limit additional plug-ins to the core distribution to plug-ins which are
considered "vital" in some way?
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:33:38 -0800, "Michael J. Hammel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I'm curious why any new plug-ins should be added to the core *at
all*. Gimp's distribution is fairly large as it is. Isn't it
getting time to limit additional plug-ins to the core distribution to
plug-ins which are
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 12:22:49PM -0800, Seth Burgess wrote:
I'd really like to see the setting for default brush reappear. So
much so that I'd do it myself.
Hows this fit with the freeze? I hate to violate the freeze, esp
since its been getting better. But I'm SO SICK OF THAT
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in my previous mail on this thread, I use the paintbrush as a "fine tuning"
tool together with the "real" tool I am drawing with. And if it is the
paintbrush, then there is no way to toggle fast between those..
45 matches
Mail list logo
