Hi there,
I'd just like to say: Well done. I managed to create a A1 poster at 600
dpi - a whopping 1.1 Gig of picture data (about 2x14000 pixels).
While GIMP 1.2.4 crashed while rendering the fractal, GIMP 1.3.20
managed to get it done and even save it as Postscript. Weehee!
BTW: Is it possib
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:21:47PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> So the huge image you generated is a fractal? Isn't it a bit silly to
> render such images (especially if they are huge) with GIMP, where all
> of the image's pixels are kept in memory (or the tile cache) all the
> time? Aren't many
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:14:43PM +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> > I'd just like to say: Well done. I managed to create a A1 poster at 600
> > dpi - a whopping 1.1 Gig of picture data (about 2x14000 pixels).
>
> Was there a real difference between 600 DPI and 300 DPI? I
Hi there,
I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.>=19
and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives.
The archive is
a) out of date (last message from July 26)
b) not searchable (ht://dig error: "Unable to read configuration file")
Bye, Tino.
--
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:29:33PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.>=19
> > and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives.
>
> They aren't publically announced but the URL appeared here earlier
> (http://gimp.org/win32/gim
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:18:44PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > You're right. If you could tell me such a program... I would have used
> > it. The nearest approximation was xfractint but it's cumbersome to use
> > and doesn't have a gradient editor (and I'm not sure whether it's
> > capable
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:22:49PM +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> > b) not searchable (ht://dig error: "Unable to read configuration file")
>
> Probably related to "a", meanwhile try 'site:lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> gimp term1 term2 ... termN' in Google.
... which doesn't hel
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:23:40PM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > I just tried to figure out where to get Windows binaries for 1.3.>=19
> > and couldn't find any. So I tried to search the archives.
> >
> > The archive is
> > a) out of date (last message from July 26)
>
> There is ano
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:03:02AM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
> > > If this is an almost-concensus (only myself, Alan Horkan and
> > > Raphael seem to like the change), it seems reasonable to revert
> > > the redo shortcut to Ctrl-R.
> >
> > Please don't. If you replace the current Ctrl-Shift-Z b
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:53:35AM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > Today a few of us were talking about this on IRC, and a couple of
> > concrete proposals came up. Well, more sandy-water proposals at
> > the moment...
>
> A 4th possibility to add to the mix...
>
> 4) Dublin, Ireland
5) Chemnitz,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:33:15PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> The question I'd like to bring up is what should be the default values
> for these. After quite some discussions I now propose the following:
>
> (toolbox¡¾window¡¾type normal)
> (dock¡¾window¡¾type normal)
> (activate¡¾on¡¾focus
(BTW: To the list moderator/admin: please discard my previous 2 mails, I
had issues with the described address...)
I'm trying to compile 2.0pre2 and it fails with
[...]
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/gimp-2.0pre2/tools'
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o gimp-remote-1.3 g
Hi there,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:38:03PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Gimp-Perl is an extension for writing Gimp Extensions/Plug-ins/Load and
> Save-Handlers in Perl. A Gimp-Perl pre-release is available on CPAN and
> at ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/plug-ins/v2.0/perl/
Is there a dedi
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:20:29PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Fortunately I have managed to solve this problem. An Xvfb server was
> > needed. After I started it and added "export DISPLAY=:1" into the PHP
> > script which calls the gimp-perl script, everything works fine. :-)
>
> Perhaps you
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 06:26:16AM +0200, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> * Don't have a use case for why would the original pixel size be
> useful. Dropped it, but have a weird feeling I'm missing
> something.
Please leave it there - I'm not sure in which case but I'm using this
inf
Hi Dov,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:09:39PM -0400, Dov Kruger wrote:
> We do 100 at a time in a script, because the command line literally
> gets too long after a while -- we could probably increase that number
> to 500 or even decrease it,
As a side note: Try using xargs. It takes care for the
Hi there,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 05:12:37PM +0200, Roman Joost wrote:
> So, what do you guys think: "Werkzeugfenster" or "Werkzeugkasten"?
Let's vote!
[ ] Werkzeugfenster
[ ] Werkzeugkasten
My vote goes for "Werkzeugfenster".
Bye, Tino.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi there,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:13:46AM +0200, Steve Stavropoulos wrote:
> > The most important thing to do is balance your tile cache setting, as
> > you've already found. You want it large enough that GIMP doesn't have
> > to use its own virtual memory, but not so large that the OS has to
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:49:03PM +0530, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
> What about making gimp do a benchmaking on the machine and then let it
> automatically decide what method 2 use for that swapping/ tiling
> stuff.. < Hey, now dont beat me. I confess i actually know none of the
> stuff>
Unfortu
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 01:12:33PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > [1] Working ain't gonna be fun - I once had an A1 poster at 300 dpi on
> > an 6 GB machine and GIMP's swap grow as large as another 6 GB since GIMP
> > didn't seem to be able to use more than 2 or 3 GB of memory altogether.
> >
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:49:39PM -, Austin Donnelly wrote:
> My favourite so far is the colourful paint pots by Metin Amiroff:
>
> http://www.gimp.org/contest/gallery.cgi?display=image&name=20041202090612748
> 6
>
> Or maybe the paint tubes by Andreas Nilsson, I can't decide:
>
> http://ww
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > I have no objections as long as people are happy with this. I
> > > would be a little worried about some splashes not getting a fair
> > > whack because they were submitted late, but sure, why not.
> > >
> > > When do you think it w
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:13:27AM +0200, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
First: I'd like to have the new tool!
Make edges moveable! In my opinion it is a must. One often cannot see
the corners (e.g. when zooming into an image to get a precise
selection).
> 4.
> > If "Adjustable" is not checked, t
Hi there,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 11:06:21PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
> > 1.
> > We may have any number of selection tools. If this selection
> > tool does not fit perfectly to somebody's working habits,
> > then we will write two slightly different variants of this tool.
> > (We also should hav
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 07:44:09AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > yesterday I started to port some code in GIMP CVS to functionality
> > that is only in glib-2.6. So we are now depending on glib >= 2.6.0.
> > glib-2.6 has been packaged for most distros for quite a while so that
> > dependency shoul
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 11:17:09PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > You asked if going to 2.6 would cause a problem for them, and they
> > indicated it would.
>
> No, they didn't. They said that they have had problems updating gtk+
> in the past. So far noone has expressed any actual problems upda
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:52:16PM +, Adam D. Moss wrote:
> >I can force it to use both CPUs now, but even with
> >200% utilization it is 2s slower to run this stupid
> >ubenchmark than on 1 CPU without threads.
>
> Just a vague guess, but the multiprocessor GIMP pixel
> work scheduler might*
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 06:54:10PM +0530, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
> An entire new idea of keystrokes : for the keyboard shortcuts: if you
> press a key the normal way ,it will select the tool indefinetely
> alright. But if the key is pressed and held, and i do something, and
> then release the k
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:16:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 21, 2005, 17:29:52, Jakub Steiner wrote:
>
> > I believe you missed the type-ahead functionality:
>
> I know of type-ahead, but it's not an adequate replacement for a real
> path+file text entry. This is how I u
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:54:12PM +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > There were plans to work on a next-generation XCF resolving these
> > issues. I too see the need for a widely accepted exchange format for
> > multilayered images with a lot of additional information, but the
> > current XCF
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 10:04:27AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> I have registered the GIMP as a mentoring organisation for the Summer of
> Code (I had been in contact with Google before the announcement), we
> should be up on the page over the next couple of days.
Maybe there's a big chunk of work
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:29:16PM +0300, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When reading about the ideas for the SoC, I was reminded of an idea I
> got when looking at a collegue showing me the L*bVi*w code development
> environment. By interactively dragging out various blocks with a
> different s
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:57:30PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Looking through the API specifications, I can't find a good way to flatten
> an image into image and alpha. I'm trying to make a save plugin for the
> Nintendo DS's texture formats, there is a list of them at
> http
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:00:58PM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > What do you mean by "apply the alpha again for preview"?
>
> I want radio boxes with the ability to choose between the different texture
> formats, and a preview thing to see which looks best, so at first, I don'
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 07:35:00PM +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> > Instead of repeatedly ranting "i want the old tool back" you should
> > realize that you are using something that is explicitely labeled
> > "unstable" and "in development". So be constructive, thus helping
> > fixing these b
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:15:05PM +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> > > That's why I would like to update the cursor position after all of
> > > the calculations are through to reflect the results.
> > Are you saying that you wish the pointer to be forced to the
> > calculated corner of a (
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 06:50:52PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > I recently finished an implementation of the healing brush. A patch
> > implementing the brush is given at
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109801#c11 but does not
> > contain the icon and cursor that I created for the
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:12:28PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > - Biased color reduction
> > >
> > > This is a feature I saw in photoshop. When reducing the colors of an
> > > image, it will try to preserve colors within the active selection
> > > more than it tries to preserve tho
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 12:48:28PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > 2. The current second dialog box shows a full list of files and
> > directories that most users will never care about at first. Maybe we
> > should add an indication that knowing all about this is not
> > necessary to use Gimp
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:28:04AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Additionaly I seriously doubt that it would be possible to make
> > The Gimp look more potato shop like by simply giving it another
> > 'skin'.
> besides of that: it is not and has never been our goal to make gimp
> look or f
Hi there,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 12:10:34PM +0100, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> Plug-ins probably also need to be grouped into smaller pieces, probably
> in terms of use. (people who use plug-in z probably also want plug-in
> y). This will increase the burden of release, but make things availabl
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 12:43:43AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What does a Windows program like Genuine Fractals do that Gimp cubic
> interpolation does not do, when I'm upscaling photographs for
> printing to 8x10 and beyond?
What are you expecting by upscaling pictures? Why do you
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 12:19:46PM +0100, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
> As any looked into how all this will work with different window
> managers? What window managers grab what keys and can the window
> managers easily be configured to use alt if gimp isn't using it?
>
> It is important to c
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 10:14:25PM +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > [...] the same features as the proprietary digital camera programs
> > for Microsoft Windows and MacOS that usually are shipped with the
> > camera.
>
> So, to over-simplify, what would be the point in porting software to
>
Hi there,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 04:15:24PM -0500, Carol Spears wrote:
> can someone help this guy?
>
> carol
[...]
> How do I install the xsane plugin in Gimp? Xsane runs ok standalone.
> I tried creating a directory called xsane under gimp-1.2/plug-ins and
> linking the xsane binary there, t
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:55:30PM +, Maurice PHILIPPE wrote:
> priority : urgent.
ahem.
> i'd like to know if , with Gimp, i can analyse an image in batch mode.
> For example, i'd like to write a program that could send an existing
> image to Gimp and ask him what
> my image contains: colour
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> - Most, if not all, plug-ins should have a preview and they should
> share a common look and feel.
>
> - The preview should be zoomable with the plug-in specifying the
> initial zoom setup (1:1 in most cases).
What about:
- lef
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> zooming by means of mouse clicks or mouse wheel is an option but there
> needs to be a UI that clearly indicates that you are able to zoom and
> how to do it. Only using the mouse w/o adding any visible UI elements
> is not an option
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:34:02PM +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> > so far, i have been pretty good about not having things on my site that
> > are already included in the GIMP. from a user point of view, this is a
> > frustrating thing about www.gimp.org and registry.gimp.org.
>
> Then by all
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 06:00:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has any one ever tried modifying GIMP to allow other than Grayscale or
> 24-bit RGB, i.e. 48-bit.
>
> Or does anyone has any useful info on how I should be approaching this.
Have a look at http://film.gimp.org/
Hope that hel
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:55:15PM +0300, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> This plug-in is stored on a Server and being accessed by other client
> machines. I want them to be able to open a window access the server,
> run the program without getting the dreaded "Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 04:09:20PM -0600, Nathan C Summers wrote:
> Hmm, maybe we could as an advanced option make the menu button on the
> canvas's upper left corner be a pie menu, and make the menu items
> completely configurable. I guess that could work.
Pie menus only make sense if you ca
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:36:20AM -0500, Stephen J Baker wrote:
BTW: I'm subscribed to the list, no need to send me a copy.
> > > Hmm, maybe we could as an advanced option make the menu button on the
> > > canvas's upper left corner be a pie menu, and make the menu items
> > > completely config
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:37:37PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> - Look through the list of open bugs for the 1.2.4 milestone (a quick
>way to get there is http://bugs.gimp.org/stable-milestone/). Some
>of these bugs need comments. Of course patches to fix them are
>highly appreciated
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 11:29:12AM -0500, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> Btw, has there been a discussion on how layer grouping will work?
> I want to be able to both group layers in just a group (aka doesnt change
> how rendering works at all) then also be able to group layers together, and
> have the
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:38:18PM -0500, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > And guess what, it fixes all GIMP bugs too!. After all, GIMP is part
> > of GNOME, so if you don't install GNOME, there won't be GIMP, so
> > there won't be any GIMP bugs! Yay!
>
> Erm, maybe this is a stupid redhat thing, b
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:39:16PM -0800, Jonathan Cohen wrote:
> We are seriously considering ripping out all modes except for
> 32-bit floating point. This would drastically simplify the internal
> rendering engine and allow us to optimize it significantly. Since we
> don't see any real reasons
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 04:27:55AM +0100, Branko Collin wrote:
> For those who don't know the series: it's about a student who is
> recruited by the CIA to fight an evil counter-intelligence
> organisation. Of course both organisations only use the highest-tech,
> of which the GIMP is apparentl
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:36:26AM +, Owen wrote:
> I apologize for this question
>
> The Gimp 1.2 I have is 2113804 bytes, it came with the MDK 9 distro
> The Gimp 1.3.11 was 3597994 bytes, officially released 1.3.11
> A recent Gimp 1.3.12 was 38551604 from one of the CVS repositories
>
> W
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:17:48PM +0100, Jean-Yves Lamoureux wrote:
> >>I begun an XCF loader (for a later use in mplayer), but I lack clear
> >>docs, as source code is a bit rusty to read like that :)
> >Why would a movie player like mplayer want to use a file format which
> >is considered to b
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 01:37:37PM +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> > I have done a small test design based on the design that drc has done
> > and also drc has helped me to make the test developers site look good
> > with the changing of colors and images. The test site can be located
> > here: http
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:39:41AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > > > What do the two different GimpPreviews do? If they are so alike, why
> > > > are there two different versions? Please explain it to me as if I
> > > > did not understand programming at all (which I don't, so it will be
> > > > v
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 08:42:00PM -0500, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
> > As already have been pointed out, lot of talk has been going about 2.0
> > being the great change, and something else being in the middle. So
> > IMHO going for 2.0 directly would cause a bit of confusion, so I do
> > not see a
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > I'm also against changing the semantics of "GIMP 2.0". It's already
> > well-known as "The GEGL GIMP with CMYK etc.". It is very hard to change
> > such wide-spread information. And I don't see a real reason either.
>
> Such widesp
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:58:06AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Well, all the agruments I see in favour of 2.0 are always of the form
> > "well, evereybody else has 2.0". Well, gtk+2 is at 2.2, msoffice is at
> > 2003 etc..
>
> I give shit on msoffice but GTK+ is the GIMP ToolKit and we will ha
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:40:17PM +1000, Owen wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:41:20 -0400
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > maybe we can jump it up to 2 simply because everyone seems to be
> > involved again :)
>
> Follow Mr Knuth's technique
> Call this one 1.4 which would be foll
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:35:51PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > And please try a google search for "gimp 2.0" as suggested. My
> > quick looking reveals "gimp 2.0 backend", 16 bit, cmyk, does qualify
> > for pre press ...
>
> I did that since Marc suggested and I spent some time with the
> resu
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:14:30PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
> > Yes, please. But we probably need to get to a point here.
> > GIMP-something.0 sounds pretty weird for a stable release...
>
> I say it's time for a show of hands. My vote is for 2.0, because
> there are likely to be lots of new bug
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 02:16:23PM +0200, Branko Collin wrote:
> IANAL, but IIRC, today is the day the absurd (and perhaps illegally
> gained) LZW patent claim of Unisys runs out in the USA. Merkins can
> use GIF now.
Please wait until 06/2004. There are still patents in Europe and Japan
until
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 03:45:30PM +0200, Marco Wessel wrote:
> > Please wait until 06/2004. There are still patents in Europe and Japan
> > until then.
>
> And here I thought software, ideas, and maths weren't patentable in
> Europe.
That's what I thought too, but my source
( http://www.heise.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:21:03AM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> > Well, the two big platforms where the GIMP will be used in the
> > future are GNOME and KDE. Both of those follow the HIG guideline
> > of Ctrl-Shift-Z. On windows, the main alternative app (photoshop)
> > uses the same shortc
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:42:49PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> > >What happens if in the future someone writes a gimp-java interface
> > >(like gimp-perl)? Would there be any security issues there?
> >
> > No.
>
> "I do not believe people like you."
>
> Sorry, but how can you so
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:27:12PM -0400, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>- to be able to execute some Java code out of a (virus-altered) GIMP
> image (Gimp Graphics Archive) takes:
> * a person running "java -jar picture.gga"
> * some "smart" program looking inside the image, recogniz
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:19:27PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > HOWEVER, this might be a good time to think about whether we'd
> > prefer a compressed format that we can random-access de/compress
> > on the fly instead of going via a huge (and with image data we
> > can easily be talking HUGE) t
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 08:37:24AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
> > The information about the CVS modules on the web is this bit
> > (from http://www.gimp.org/devel_cvs.html )
> (...)
> > I know from at least gimp-gap and gimp-perl more, maybe there are a
> > couple I have not heard about.
>
> Ther
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:33:50AM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> >why would i want to save to a file format that would render my image
> >that's built up of layer masks and vector text layers really badly
> >if opened in a standard viewer
>
> Because at least you COULD open it up in a
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:55:26PM +0100, Mukund wrote:
> | BTW, Microsoft Windows registry is already basically an extensible file
> | system within a file. A high end business product that I use called also
> | SAS has something similar. I would guess there are others out there as
> | well.
>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:22:54PM +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> I'd rather have some kind of archive format. If we want to replace an
> element in the archive by another one that is larger, we can append the
> larger one at the end of the archive, update the index and leave some
> unused bits i
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 02:22:03PM +0100, Mukund wrote:
> | > Subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) implements a versioned FS
> | > using a Sleepycat's Berkeley DB database. It has a full library
> | > implementation which any application could use.
> |
> | Well, using a database as containe
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:51:53PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Even if your images are black and white, they are most likely stored in a
> > compressed format (if a Subversion based GIMP file format was ever
> > invented), and if such compressed files are revisioned, no
> > generic algorithm is
80 matches
Mail list logo
