* and then olivier ripoll declared
> >Right, I actually got on really well with using a layer mask! - However,
> >now i am down to the very fine details im not sure i have the right
> >brush. You mentioned 'feathered' but i dont see that in the tool
> >options? Im using a 3px fuzzy circle, is
Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then olivier ripoll declared
Right, do you think that photo is now rubbish? do i need to start over
from the beggining?
No, but you will not obtain a final good result with only the eraser or
the magic wand selection tool. At some point you need a tool where you
can
Hi,
Michael Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> or> Yep, these fonts should be perfect. But indeed, 16 pixels is a little
> or> troublesome to have nice text: I have tried with Nimbus and Vera, and
> or> the result is not satisfying...
>
> I tried Tahoma and Verdena and the result gets better.
* and then olivier ripoll declared
> >Right, do you think that photo is now rubbish? do i need to start over
> >from the beggining?
>
> No, but you will not obtain a final good result with only the eraser or
> the magic wand selection tool. At some point you need a tool where you
> can sele
Nick Wilson wrote:
* and then olivier ripoll declared
I think the following tutorial corresponds more or less to what you want
to achieve.
http://www.gimpguru.org/Tutorials/ReplaceForeground/
The problem of loosing pixels you had with you dog and with your sister
would be easily avoided if:
* and then olivier ripoll declared
> I think the following tutorial corresponds more or less to what you want
> to achieve.
> http://www.gimpguru.org/Tutorials/ReplaceForeground/
>
> The problem of loosing pixels you had with you dog and with your sister
> would be easily avoided if:
>
> 1
I have used a font called Ergoe for 12 pt text buttons, and it worked great. I cannot tell you from where I installed it, but any time I need small text it is the one I choose as it is clear and legible.
Here is a web site I did many years ago, much has changed but the mouseover on the left is st
Nick Wilson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Im selecting a subject (my sister) from her background, for use as a
transparent jpg on a webpage. Here is the pic so far:
http://www.stylesheet.org/2.jpg
I know i need to replace quite a few pixels that got inadvertently
transparentized (?) but my question is this
Colin Bannister wrote:
make fails, with output below.
if /bin/bash ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I..
-I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0
-I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/openwin/inc
Hallo,
[snip]
or> Yep, these fonts should be perfect. But indeed, 16 pixels is a little
or> troublesome to have nice text: I have tried with Nimbus and Vera, and
or> the result is not satisfying...
I tried Tahoma and Verdena and the result gets better...
>> or> 2- antialiasing: in the text t
--- Michael Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hallo again,
I send this mail back to the list (maybe my reply-to is not correct...
you replied directly to me, not to the list).
> or> Michael Wagner wrote:
> >> The button should have a total height of 16 pixels and so
> >> I start with an empt
Hi everyone,
Im selecting a subject (my sister) from her background, for use as a
transparent jpg on a webpage. Here is the pic so far:
http://www.stylesheet.org/2.jpg
I know i need to replace quite a few pixels that got inadvertently
transparentized (?) but my question is this: I have roughly u
I have now managed to install GTK 2.4.9 on Sun Solaris.
Now at last at the stafe of building GIMP, using 2.0.4 distribution.
Configure goes OK, using
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --disable-print
as there are no printers directly attached to the Solaris machine.
make fails, with output below
Hi, all.
And nevertheless... Why my code doesn't work with alpha?
>(define (spline)
> (let* ((a (cons-array 8 'byte)))
> (aset a 0 0 0)
> (aset a 1 85 20)
> (aset a 2 170 40)
> (aset a 3 255 60)
> a))
>
>(gimp-curves-spline text-layer 4 4 (spline))
I wa
Hallo,
I am using version 2.0.4 on Windows; I have also tried the same thing on the
same version on Linux (Knoppix-Hdd-Install to be exact).
Viele Grüße
Michael Wagner
--
www.callacd.com - Ihr persönlicher Downloadservice
===
Thursday, September 2
Hi,
olivier ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am wondering if it is worth opening a bug for this minor UI bug:
>
> I have noticed that with 2.1.5 "open file" dialog (and at least also
> 2.1.4), the window is resized when the arrow-folding-widget (*) for
> file type (or is it for advanced op
Hi,
Michael Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to create web navigation buttons with text on it. Of course I am
> using TheGimp for it, but I have a problem:
>
> The button should have a total height of 16 pixels and so I start
> with an empty image of that height. Every time I use
Michael Wagner wrote:
The button should have a total height of 16 pixels and so I start with an empty
image of that height. Every time I use the text tool the resulting text looks
really ugly.
I already have a running web page where the navigation bar is created of text
links (only using the tag)
I am wondering if it is worth opening a bug for this minor UI bug:
I have noticed that with 2.1.5 "open file" dialog (and at least also
2.1.4), the window is resized when the arrow-folding-widget (*) for file
type (or is it for advanced options, I do not remember) is
clicked/unfolded. This resiz
Hello gimp-gurus,
I am trying to create web navigation buttons with text on it. Of course I am
using TheGimp for it, but I have a problem:
The button should have a total height of 16 pixels and so I start with an empty
image of that height. Every time I use the text tool the resulting text looks
I've opened the bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153516
David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
Are there any plans of fixing the bug
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124134
in 2.2?
Given that the bug is marked as FIXED? I doubt it. It won't show
up in any of the
* and then matt-nc declared
>
> >She was on the grass, many different shades... any idea of the best way
> >to replace the pixels i accidently took off of her chin?
>
> Zoom in to highest magnification, use the clone tool to select shades from
> the nearby facial area and reconstruct it by
22 matches
Mail list logo
