On 06/08/18 11:14, rich404 wrote:
Can I get a Gimp 2.8 user manual?
Depends on what your OS is - Windows - Linux - OSX Your required language and if
you want it as a local installation.
Windows see: https://www.gimp.org/downloads/ about half way down the page
Linux - look in your package
On 04/04/18 22:44, Michelle Beckstrom via gimp-user-list wrote:
Hi I recently downloaded GIMP & have tried to enter text in a text box I
created. But even tho my cursor is inside the box no text will appear when I hit
the keys.
Could there maybe be a glitch in the copy I downloaded?
Please
I reinstalled Gimp and is working fine now.
Thank you.
-- Original Message --
From: "Ofnuts" <ofn...@gmx.com>
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Sent: 13/3/2018 1:21:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.8 "has stoppped working" on WIndows
On 03/13/18 08:07, Sterp
On 03/13/18 08:07, Sterpu Victor wrote:
Sorry, I missed the image size, the size is 5456x3632(from a Sony camera)
Gimp is on 64 bits("C:\Program Files\GIMP 2\bin\gimp-2.8.exe").
CPU is a 64 bits, I7 series, Windows is 10 Pro on 64 bits.
I copied here first 67 images:
-- Original Message --
From: "Ofnuts" <ofn...@gmx.com>
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Sent: 13/3/2018 1:43:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.8 "has stoppped working" on WIndows
On 03/12/18 15:31, Sterpu Victor wrote:
Images are 5456x362 and I was tryng
On 03/12/18 15:31, Sterpu Victor wrote:
Images are 5456x362 and I was tryng to batch crop all of them with a
Gimp script.
I have 800 of these images and Gimp stops at 60.
I know this is not very efficient as Gimp loads all layers in memory
but I have enough RAM.
Strange size, or is it
fn...@gmx.com>
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Sent: 12/3/2018 3:48:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.8 "has stoppped working" on WIndows
How big are the images you are trying to load?
On 03/12/18 13:25, Sterpu Victor wrote:
Hello.
I'm using Gimp 2.8 and when I do: "File/Open a
How big are the images you are trying to load?
On 03/12/18 13:25, Sterpu Victor wrote:
Hello.
I'm using Gimp 2.8 and when I do: "File/Open as layers" Gimp stops and
I see the error "GNU Image Manipulation Program has stopped working".
This heappens after about 60 layers. I increased the max
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:29:44 +0100
> From: for...@gimpusers.com
> To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> CC: notificati...@gimpusers.com
> Subject: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.8 erase to transparent doesn't work in Win 10
>
>
> Works fine in Win 7.
> Opened new with background transparent. in layers alpha
That is correct. A recent update to libcairo (not GIMP per se) resulted in a
cascading event scenario in GIMP (also Inkscape) when rulers are visible and
the tablet pen is moved too quickly:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736411
> "...we were basically
redrawing the ruler
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 21:11 +0200, wk_ wrote:
Liam wrote:
If it is a scan of a printed document is is to be expected that
there may be moiré patterns, even if the scanner is set to apply a
descreen filter.
I feel that there is something lost from my original post. Like it
never
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliasing
So, if you scale down to 51% (which is about 2x) you first do a 2px
Gaussian blur. Result here:
http://imgur.com/iZB3lmw
On 20/04/15 09:25, wk_ wrote:
Steve wrote:
I got the original image you posted, and enhanced the contrast with
duplicate
On Sun, 2015-04-19 at 22:20 +0200, wk_ wrote:
Steve wrote:
I have never seen anything exactly like this, so I am confident
that it is not an artifact introduced by scaling an image in the
GIMP.
I don't understand your way to this conclusion. In my original post I
have
source scan,
Michael asked:
I have a long list of images (wallpapers/backgrounds). Just for the
sack of argument, let's say that I have
500 images. Can I perform a bulk image resizing by selecting all the
images and have Gimp perform a resizing?
Pat David writes:
This is a task likely better suited
Don't see a screenshot. You probably have conflicting DLLs.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:24 PM, U 2 paraleju...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear gimp users,
Can anyone help me?
As soon as I do anything with a just opened file
- even if it's just enlarging the window -
the program crashes with an
On 25.11.2014 18:24, U 2 wrote:
As soon as I do anything with a just opened file
- even if it's just enlarging the window -
the program crashes with an error message
about runtime which ran out...
see screenshot if you like
From that error description, I assume this is on the Windows
DSunhammer wrote
Hello friends, it's 2014 and i just updated gimp to 2.8.10 from 2.8.2 and
am
still getting issue with ALL COLOR PICKERS linked from any of the dialogs.
The
color picker always returns black color regarless of where you click. I am
on
RDP, Win7 x64 Slovak. This really makes
On 28.07.2014 18:55, Maxeem wrote:
But one of the absolute best ways to pick color has been clicking on the
present colors to get the color dialogue, so you can work with the pallet
and get any visible on-screen color, which is one of the most amazing and
useful tools built into 2.6 that *is
On 5.7.2014 at 3:43 PM Mark Grisham wrote:
As I’m brand new, I have missed any past discussion about the compatibility of
GIMP 2.8 and the new (in beta currently) Yosemite.
No, there wasn't such a discussion here and I don't know of any
actions towards Yosemite yet. I assume there will be
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:27 AM, scl scl.gp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5.7.2014 at 3:43 PM Mark Grisham wrote:
As I’m brand new, I have missed any past discussion about the
compatibility of GIMP 2.8 and the new (in beta currently) Yosemite.
No, there wasn't such a discussion here and I
Hi Partha,
On 05.07.2014 at 9:15 P.M. Partha Bagchi wrote:
No, don't know anymore. However, looking at the preview (and I'll try and
participate in the beta and test Gimp 2.9 on it). I am not anticipating that
it'll be an radical redesign. I'll let you know.
It sounds like you are
On 05.07.2014 22:07, Sven Claussner wrote:
Hi Partha,
On 05.07.2014 at 9:15 P.M. Partha Bagchi wrote:
No, don't know anymore. However, looking at the preview (and I'll try and
participate in the beta and test Gimp 2.9 on it). I am not anticipating that
it'll be an radical redesign.
And I am confused by your response. :) But that can be me.
What is confusing to the users or to you?
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Michael Schumacher schum...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05.07.2014 22:07, Sven Claussner wrote:
Hi Partha,
On 05.07.2014 at 9:15 P.M. Partha Bagchi wrote:
No,
Hi,
I think the topic has moved too far from the original
question and has become more of a development related topic.
Let's continue on developer list.
Greetings,
Sven
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:44 AM, VGus wrote:
So I've finally upgraded to GIMP 2.8, finding that .abr was native. I've
downloaded thousands of brushes, only a hundred work, MAYBE. I'm confused
because even the brushes that are not in .abr form do not work. Also,
sometimes
if I try to fix the
* Mike Armistead m...@mikearmistead.com [08-22-13 11:24]:
I have downloaded several iterations of Gimp 2.8, now up to 2.8.6, and
all I get is a blank screen with the menu bar at the top (and the Gimp
logo in the background). I don't see any of the toolbars or control
panels that all tutorials
* Mike Armistead m...@mikearmistead.com [08-22-13 11:24]:
I have downloaded several iterations of Gimp 2.8, now up to 2.8.6, and
all I get is a blank screen with the menu bar at the top (and the Gimp
logo in the background). I don't see any of the toolbars or control
panels that all
On 05/29/2013 07:49 PM, Helen wrote:
I recently upgraded to suse 12.3 and now have gimp 2.8. (I like 2.6 much
better, but that's not the question.) I lost my
personal brushes, but I have the old brushes on another machine. Is there
any reason I should not move my old (2.6) brushes
into
Look at the goat exercise plugin.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 7:43 AM, FBergemann for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
i compiled gimp. 2.8 on my ubuntu according:
http://www.gimpusers.com/tutorials/compiling-gimp-for-ubuntu
Now i want to write my own (C++) plug-in and tried this as a start:
2012/11/27 AshtarSheran for...@gimpusers.com:
Is it possible for user to disable Gimp 2.8 slider widgets and use normal
widgets instead? I used to type values like opacity, scale, etc manually and
now
it became very uncomfortable to do.
You can type them, of course. Click in the widget and
2012/11/27 AshtarSheran for...@gimpusers.com:
2012/11/27 AshtarSheran for...@gimpusers.com:
You can type them, of course. Click in the widget and erase characters
on the right of the vertical bar, then type what you want.
The problem is what with sliders I have to be extremely accurate with where
On 2012-11-27 17:05, AshtarSheran wrote:
I used to type values like opacity, scale, etc manually and now
it became very uncomfortable to do.
The number field could use padding definitely, but a workaround for now
is to triple click the text and then type in the new number. Second
click selects
Hi lakmar,
On 10/4/2012 7:31 AM, lakmar wrote:
I have downlaoded and unzipped brushes in the following directory:
Library-Application Support-Gimp-brushes
I am not able to see them in Gimp, after i restart. What is it i am doing
wrong?
trying putting them in this directory:
GIMP
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 03:48:15 +0200
From: for...@gimpusers.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
CC: t...@gimpusers.com
Subject: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.8 export, after save as keeps old files name
Hello, i have a question, when i open a new file and export it with
ctrl+e, the gimp 2.8 exports
Select Color picker tool and in Tool Options dockable dialogue toggle
Set_foreground_color instead of Pick_only. Now when you use eyedropper from
Change_Foreground_Color dialog window it will change foreground color to the
one you picked. This will help you restore your workflow til the bug is
Someone will have to write a patch or eventually a fork to make this
happen. The argument is dead.
The implementation and behaviors are somewhat inconsistent. You can
open any format you want, you just can save any format you want. It
has to be export. Why not have the only way to get
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Johannes wrote:
Having followed the discussions on the GIMP usability changes for some weeks
now, what I am missing most is a direct comparison of arguments.
Therefore let's consolidate the consensus and the arguments pro and contra
Making the new
Well, that is the question isn't it?
On 7/14/2012 7:34 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Johannes wrote:
Having followed the discussions on the GIMP usability changes for some weeks
now, what I am missing most is a direct comparison of arguments.
Therefore
Am 14.07.2012 16:45, schrieb Chris Mohler:
You can:
A: Bitch
B: Adapt
C: Fork
I suggest option B or C - they're likely to be the most productive.
In fact, I am preparing option B.
Precondition for this is a good understanding of what is to be adapted.
I don't want my changes to be
Am 14.07.2012 19:24, schrieb Johannes:
not cast perls before
people without arguments.
...and no pearls, too.
--
Johannes
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
On 14.07.2012 19:24, Johannes wrote:
Am 14.07.2012 16:45, schrieb Chris Mohler:
You can:
A: Bitch
B: Adapt
C: Fork
I suggest option B or C - they're likely to be the most productive.
In fact, I am preparing option B.
Precondition for this is a good understanding of what is to be adapted.
On 7/14/2012 04:45, Chris Mohler wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Johannes anonfo...@gmx.org wrote:
This is the consensus so far (correct me if I am wrong):
### CORRECTED
There are a handful of people developing GIMP. They are following this:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:56 AM, scott s. wrote:
It seems to me that opening vice import has many of the same issues/
useability requirements that should be considered. In particular, a
problem I encounter with workflow in GIMP is that GIMP doesn't really
handle (AFAIK) meta-data embedded
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:46:00 +0800
From: ngoonee.t...@gmail.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp - 2.8 Usability Drop
what 'community' and 'user base' is this that you speak
of? All I see is some individuals with individual opinions and a
varying lack
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:40 PM, drankinatty wrote:
The logical solution here is simple. Simply meet the needs of both those
who like the old style dialogs and those that like the new by providing the
_option_ to select which type dialog behavior to use. The code for each is
already
On 07/12/2012 04:30 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
On 07/12/2012 05:40 PM, drankinatty wrote:
[...]
You aren't going to like Windows 8... and this ain't open source(*)
(*) yes, there is also the case of Unity...
OH GHOD don't get me started on Unity. Long story short, when
Ubuntu 10.4 reaches EOL, I
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:40 PM, drankinatty for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
Now we find ourselves in a situation where the community and user base has
made clear their preference for the 2.6 style open/save dialog that preserves
the choice of the user to save in whatever format they choose,
On 07/12/2012 09:46 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
[...]
Opensource always has been a meritocracy, not a democracy.
Except when it's a dictatorship, i.e. Ubuntu is owned outright by
Mark Shuttleworth and users saw the handwriting on the wall months
before the Unity debacle surfaced, when he announced he
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Steve Kinney ad...@pilobilus.net wrote:
On 07/12/2012 09:46 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
[...]
Opensource always has been a meritocracy, not a democracy.
Except when it's a dictatorship, i.e. Ubuntu is owned outright by
Mark Shuttleworth and users saw the
From: w.macdon...@imperial.ac.uk
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:58:25 +
Subject: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.8 Bug - Disk read error
Dear All,
I happily used Gimp 2.4 and 2.6 for quite some time on my laptop.
Now I have downloaded and installed Gimp 2.8 it won’t
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Coocoocoo Coo wrote:
- When saving (pardon me, exporting) images to JPG, the advanced options
dialogue DOES NOT assume the defaults as selected by the user after clicking
on Save Defaults; instead, it expects the user to click on Load Defaults
ALL THE TIME!
On 17-06-2012 20:33, Leonard Evens wrote:
I can't figure out what is going on with bit depth (precision) in gimp
2.8.
I read in a .png file which had 16 bit precision, but when I exported it
to a .png file under a different name I got a file with 8 bit precision.
It used to be true that when
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Leonard Evens wrote:
Is higher precision just awaiting another version of gimp?
It will be available in 2.10.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
I can't figure out what is going on with bit depth (precision) in gimp
2.8.
I read in a .png file which had 16 bit precision, but when I exported
it
to a .png file under a different name I got a file with 8 bit
precision.
It used to be true that when gimp read in a 16 bit file, it issued a
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 14:13 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
My new Fedora 17 installation says it has gimp 2.8.
But the changes I've seen described for gimp 2.8 are not apparent.
The interface seems unchanged with multiple windows.
It does seem that you can set a single window interface.
Leonard Evens (l...@math.northwestern.edu) wrote:
The interface seems unchanged with multiple windows.
Seems you found the single window mode by now :)
Also, supposedly there is an ImagePrecision Menu item which allows me
to se the precision. I don't have that.
You have been misinformed.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Leonard Evens wrote:
Also, supposedly there is an ImagePrecision Menu item which allows me
to se the precision. I don't have that.
Of course you don't. It's not in 2.8 and wasn't even supposed to be.
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:09:14 +0200
From: for...@gimpusers.com
To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org
CC: t...@gimpusers.com
Subject: [Gimp-user] GIMP 2.8 per Windows, problem with the color picker
Sorry to be not very clear. I'm referring to the eyedropper in the
Foreground change color and the
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:31 AM, utiler wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have just loaded 2.8 with much anticipation and found that the default
toolbox is fixed on the right-hand side of the screen adjacent to the
dockable toolbars.
Is this normal for 2.8? It seems weird that it would now be
59 matches
Mail list logo
