Thanks, Jim. That answers my question rather completely.
[:)]
Dave
(I know what I need to do to fix this. I'm just curious about what
good reason IBM might or might not have for doing this.)
(1) Pageable common storage (pageable CSA and DREF SQA) can exist
in the same segment as fixed
From: Craddock, Chris
: In a second deplorable senior moment, I confounded Shane Ginnane with
: Chris Craddock. They do not always agree, and I apologize to both of
: them.
:
: We only disagree when Shane's wrong.
Ooh, couldn't agree with that ... :o)
You mean we *always* agree -
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:35:37 -0500 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/30/2005
: at 11:35 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:Is there, then, no SIOT for dynamically allocated data sets?
:Not that I'm aware of; I believe that the relevant data
So, does UA22489 have the same problem with HDS as UA22552? Or does
it
circumvent the HDS problem??
Yes it does have the same problem. Either PTF causes the same issue. I
did ask that question.
Thanks.
John Eatherly
--
For
New to mainframe..so the question maybe look a little silly.
Here is what IEFSSN00 of our site defines JES2:
SUBSYS SUBNAME(JES2) /* JES2 AS PRIMARY SUBSYSTEM */
PRIMARY(YES) START(NO)
My question is concerning parmameter SUBNAME:
Is it true that it must be the same name as JES2 procedure?
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 08:40:52 -0800, Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The simplest way to 'freeze operations' in an LPAR is the MVS QUIESCE
command, which puts the system into a restartable wait state. I was in a
shop a long time ago that routinely used QUIESCE while switching a
Frank Lawrence wrote:
I was surprised to find today that IBM no longer offers OSA Token Ring as
of the introduction of the zSeries z9-109 processor line. Apparently they
made some statement of direction about this last year, but then who takes
those things seriously. It's sort of like when IBM
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
snip
It's sort of like when IBM responds to a SHARE
requirement with the words future design consideration --- you just
don't believe it is really going to happen.
Why? I know of one that IBM implemented after rejecting it.
This is not terribly unusual.
Short answer is that the primary subsystem (for JES2) must be named JES2
and the procedure must have the same name.
Johnny Luo wrote:
New to mainframe..so the question maybe look a little silly.
Here is what IEFSSN00 of our site defines JES2:
SUBSYS SUBNAME(JES2) /* JES2 AS PRIMARY SUBSYSTEM
I believe that you are incorrect. We had one system in our sysplex have a JES2
running as JESR for several years. No problems at all.
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Arnett
Sent:
You will probably get different answers on this question. Here is my
answer.
My memory says that the MAIN JES2 Subsystem needs to be JES2. If you define
addition JES2 subsystems (secondary) then they can be JESA, JESB, etc...
The main reason is that every piece of documentation is for JES2.
Thanks, this is what I was looking for. I will take a look at this and see
how to go about implementing it. I will let you know how it goes.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
No matter what you name it, keep the PROC and SUBNAME names in
sync. An STC whose name matches a subsystem name is started
under the MASTER instead of under the primary JES, which is what
you want for JESx. (Otherwise, you would need to explicitly specify
SUB=MSTR on the start command.)
And,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johnny Luo
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Define and start JES2
New to mainframe..so the question maybe look a little silly.
Here is what
I believe that you are incorrect. We had one
system in our sysplex have a JES2 running as
JESR for several years. No problems at all.
We had a three site complex with JES2 at two
sites and JES3 at another.
We always called the sub-systems 'JES', with
no number. It made automation easier.
Question posed by me late last week with latest status below.
We are running z/OS V1R6 with Host-on-Demand V7 running within the HTTP
Server. We have noticed that the HTTP Server will just stop dispatching
tasks. After a while it will return to normal and go for many hours before
doing it again
Allocations of scratch tape mounts can be controlled if in an SMS tape
environment such as a VTS or 3494 library. The SMS routines have
access to info such as the RACF userid, group, and job name and can
fail execution for those who aren't your loved ones. The SMS routines
are not called for
Ben Alford wrote:
Allocations of scratch tape mounts can be controlled if in an SMS tape
environment such as a VTS or 3494 library. The SMS routines have
access to info such as the RACF userid, group, and job name and can
fail execution for those who aren't your loved ones. The SMS routines
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6121/1/
Novell's New CTO/EVP Mulls 2006 Linux Strategy LinuxPlanet -
Darien,CT,USA ... Over the years, he observed, the fundamental
computing paradigm
has shifted from MVS, to Unix, and then to Microsoft Windows. ...
Linux is the next big
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: fundamental computing paradigm has shifted from
MVS, to Unix, and then to Microsoft Windows
In a message dated 1/3/2006 1:12:36 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I missed that shift... I must have been too busy still getting work
done with MVS:-)
_http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20060102.html_
Sam Knutson said;
Novell's New CTO/EVP Mulls 2006 Linux Strategy LinuxPlanet -
Darien,CT,USA ... Over the years, he observed, the fundamental
computing paradigm has shifted from MVS, to Unix, and then to
Microsoft Windows. ... Linux is the next big opportunity.
HUH?
I missed that
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:12:09 -0500, Knutson, Sam wrote:
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6121/1/
During his first month on the job at Novell, Dr. Jeffrey ('Jeff') Jaffe
has roved the globe, culling ideas from his new colleagues about company
strategy around Linux and open source
Please remove me from this list...I
have asked numerous times..AP
This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the individual or
company to which it is addressed and may contain information which is
privileged, confidential and prohibited from disclosure or unauthorized use
under
Linkname: NIST Time and Frequency FAQ
URL: http://tf.nist.gov/general/leaps.htm#Anchor-52904
What is a leap second?
A leap second is a second added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) to make
it agree with
astronomical time to within 0.9 second.
I don't believe the 0.9 second
Novell's New CTO/EVP Mulls 2006 Linux Strategy
LinuxPlanet - Darien,CT,USA ...
Over the years, he observed, the fundamental computing paradigm has
shifted from MVS, to
Unix, and then to Microsoft Windows. ...
Linux is the next big opportunity.
HUH?
Word here in Sheffield is that IBM
You may leave the list at any time by sending a SIGNOFF IBM-MAIN command
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AP Lane
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:15 PM
Tom Schmidt wrote:
During his first month on the job at Novell, Dr. Jeffrey ('Jeff') Jaffe
has roved the globe, culling ideas from his new colleagues about company
strategy around Linux and open source in 2006 and future years to come.
'It's important to get a hearing of ideas. We can then
Help yourself follow the instructions here
http://www.planetmvs.com/ibm-main/faqg.html#unsubscribe
How do I unsubscribe from the IBM-MAIN mailing list?
Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with this in the body of the note:
SIGNOFF IBM-MAIN
Best
Where can I find this doc: Hardware Management Console Operations Guide
(V1.8.2) SC28-6830?
I can't find it on IBM Library Server Library site.
Thanks,
Craig
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
I did a search on GOOGLE for SC28-6830 and got this:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2d37db3ef98da032e85256e550073182caid=1
Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/03/2006 15:46
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
i found it here...
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2d37db3ef98da032e85256e550073182caid=1
- Original Message -
From: Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:46 PM
Subject: Hardware
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 3:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Hardware Management Console Operations Guide
(V1.8.2) SC28-6830?
Where can I find this
Thanks Alan!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan C. Field
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Hardware Management Console Operations Guide (V1.8.2)
SC28-6830?
I did a search on GOOGLE
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:22:11 +0800, Ron and Jenny Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CABLE.COM wrote:
Of course, this all assumes that customers have workplace access to the
internet - not always true in some Asian Countries. ...
Not always true in some US companies. We have no mainframe access to the
Thanks John, I've bookmarked it...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Hardware Management Console Operations Guide (V1.8.2)
SC28-6830?
Thanks Rob!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Schwartz
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Hardware Management Console Operations Guide (V1.8.2)
SC28-6830?
i found it here...
Our year end 'sweet deal' from IBM was a tape 'robot'. The IBM 3494
system. We don't do near enough tape processing to justify the VTS. Two
robots, actually, one for our production site and one for the BR site.
This system is to replace our two antique 3490 ACL units and two aged
3590 ACL
I am attempting to install the XML toolkit for z/os 1.8. I get to a
certain point in the installation instructions and confusion arises.
Any help would be appreciated. I will summarize below, where I am and
where I am confused.
Thanx in advance
Brad Taylor
1. I have downloaded and read the
Think very, very large. Our XML HFS is about half the size of the z/OS
logical root. (z/OS 1.8? You are certainly in reach-ahead mode.)
Data Set Name . . . : OSR17.OMVS.XML
General Data Current Allocation
Management class . . : **None** Allocated tracks . :
So, does UA22489 have the same problem with HDS as UA22552? Or does
it
circumvent the HDS problem??
Yes it does have the same problem. Either PTF causes the same issue. I
did ask that question.
So IBM needs to add the AI to the superceding PTFs. Did they volunteer
to do so?
If IBM de-emphasizes z/Linux, it would almost certainly
be in favor of p/Architecture (and p/Linux) rather than
in favor of z/OS (or z/VM).
As pure speculation... I would not be surprised to
see mixed p/Arch-z/Arch sysplexes sharing high-powered
hierarchal file systems (or raw files) using the
Short answer is that the primary subsystem (for JES2) must be named JES2
and the procedure must have the same name.
Baloney. Here is the start of the IEFSSNxx member from my Test system
called MVS4 so JES2 runs as JES4;
SUBSYS SUBNAME(SMS) /* SMS SHOULD BE THE FIRST ENTRY*/
43 matches
Mail list logo
