The RENT attribute is not ignored for unauthorized programs. The program is
still treated as reentrant (no new LOAD; no wait for completion of other
processes), only the write protection is not set.
Now consider the following:
We have modules that try to improve performance by doing complex
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:34:46 +0200 Bernd Oppolzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:The RENT attribute is not ignored for unauthorized programs. The program is
:still treated as reentrant (no new LOAD; no wait for completion of other
:processes), only the write protection is not set.
:Now consider
How can I use RXVSAM READGENERIC function, I try to use it, but it always
return RC=16(record not found). And I am not sure whether STARTBR function
support generic function.
Anybody can help me clear.
Best regards,
He Ming
R/O is stronger than refreshable, but neither is stronger than
reentrant, since neither implies serialization.
It is true that read-only and refreshable do not imply serialization. But
that doesn't speak towards what I was thinking of as stronger.
You can have a reentrant module that is not
Peter Relson wrote on 10/23/2006 07:02:08 AM:
I think you cannot have a refreshable module that is not reentrant, and I
think refreshable implies must be read-only.
So doesn't that make refreshable stronger than reentrant?
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
My understand of this in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
[ snip ]
LLA is Linklist Look-Aside.
???
Isn't it Library Look-Aside? Or is this another example of an
overused TLA?
-jc-
On 20 Oct 2006 13:27:56 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
But, the INTERNET is more to help existing (mostly retail) retail.
This is to reduce costs more than improve customer service.
When in doubt.
When you know the name of your bank, the important thing is to be able
to spell it.
We want to install one port in a switch and we can't find the HCM option
for do it. With HCD we can change the hardware status field, and the
option work with ports displays all the ports in the switch (installed
and not installed), but HCM only display the not installed ports and the
hardware
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 7:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Multiple FTP Problems
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/20/2006
at 07:04 AM, Edward
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:52:43 +1000, Jason Gately [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yeswe set it to 2000 last week, and saw a reduction in Uncaptured.
(in fact, this APAR was created in part due to some excellent work by our
capacity performance guy's, who saw a marked increase in Uncaptured when
we
Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
The RENT attribute is not ignored for unauthorized programs. The program is
still treated as reentrant (no new LOAD; no wait for completion of other
processes), only the write protection is not set.
Of course, that's what I meant. The RENT option is ignored for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
[ snip ]
Will CSV and storage management ever allow load modules and
data to occupy the same page? If so, a program might need to
be protected with neutral zones on both ends.
CICS Storage
John Kalinich writes:
My understand of this in the OS/360 era was that if a module had the
refreshable attribute it could be replaced on the fly by the machine
check handler (MCH) in order to recover from memory errors.
and this is exactly right. In those days the official LE definition of
Edward Jaffe wrote:
However, this post serves to further underscore the validity of my
suggestion re: the REFR attribute. It is an old option that is not
currently being exploited by the operating system. It could be added
in an upward compatible way. (See Jim Mulder's post in this thread.)
Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
Edward Jaffe wrote:
However, this post serves to further underscore the validity of my
suggestion re: the REFR attribute. It is an old option that is not
currently being exploited by the operating system. It could be added
in an upward compatible way. (See Jim
Edward Jaffe wrote:
If REFR programs are automatically protected by a future operating
system release, why would you care into which subpool they are loaded?
I prefer SP 252 because it isn't fetch protected, thus allowing the
modules' storage to be read in any key. But, that's a different
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:48:43 +, john gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
... I can in fact think
of no---circumstances in which it is excusable to write
non-reentrant code.
Do you consider the architecture to be deficient because it does
not provide for the separation of data and
Question came up here about moving to
Linux from a host of servers.
1. Have any of you experienced this?
2. Did you go native LINUX or
3. Multiple issues of Linux under Z/VM?
Not really in need of technical answers,
just basic why you did what you did, if you are willing to share.
Thank you in
Hi, All,
Is anybody here running a product WhitehillxmlTransport? We're
trying to get it to run efficiently on z/OS UNIX, but so far the best
performance we've been able to coax out of LE and Java for this
application is abysmal (e.g., 7 minutes for a job that should take
about 10 seconds).
Hi Gilbert,
If you want to round out the modules to allow you to page protect them
perhaps something like this instead of the special link edit procedure.
*
LTORG ,
*
* round this module to a page boundary for page protect
DC((*+4095-DRIVER)/4096*4096-(*-DRIVER))X'00'
In a recent note, Peter Relson said:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:02:08 -0400
I think you cannot have a refreshable module that is not reentrant, and I
think refreshable implies must be read-only.
A module that acquires a common work area, perhaps anchoring it with
name/token
Peter Relson wrote:
I think you cannot have a refreshable module that is not reentrant, and I
think refreshable implies must be read-only.
As a crude counter example, think of a module that does
something to the system, and stashes a CVT entry. The module may
be refreshable, but for
In a recent note, Edward Jaffe said:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:39:21 -0700
sure there are a few existing programs, erroneously marked REFR, that
deliberately modify themselves. Those programs will need to be relinked.
For everything else, it's business as usual. ...
Worst case:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Aaron Walker
I'm not familiar with the product. I would suggest that LE
tuning is not necessarily your problem. Just for background,
which JVM are you running,
Output from java -version:
java version 1.4.2
Knutson, Sam wrote:
If you want to round out the modules to allow you to page protect them
perhaps something like this instead of the special link edit procedure.
*
LTORG ,
*
* round this module to a page boundary for page protect
DC
Good point. Is this something that should be raised against the Binder
as a requirement for load modules? It doesn't seem like anyone who
wants to do this should have to use anything besides IBM HLASM and
Binder to accomplish it. Is there a way to do that today?
Best Regards,
Daniel,
We attempted the zVM with multiple instances of Linux running under
it.
As a technician, I thought it was a great concept. However, we ran into
more non-technical issues that eventually killed the project.
1) Politics
2) Planning (Lack of) - Support Structures, Tuning,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is the teaching of non-reentrant HLASM coding practices ever
defensible?
Hi Gilbert,
If you
While we're on the subject of machine performance .
Do I recall correctly hearing that BCTR Rn,0 is no longer the favored way of
decrementing a register, perhaps because the cache logic sees it as a
potential branch, and that AHI Rn,-1 should be substituted?
Similarly, that AHI is
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:33:41 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've hit a sore spot with me. In my experience, anything (not just a
program) that starts out as a One Off or Quick Dirty
implementation often has a way of eventually being used for daily,
production use. There's always
John,
The first step is to figure out if the JVM is running reasonably well.
You can do this by timing HelloWorld.
Here's what I get on my system:
export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lpp/java14/IBM/J1.4
time $JAVA_HOME/bin/java -cp $JAVA_HOME -version HelloWorld
java version 1.4.1
Java(TM) 2 Runtime
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
John,
The first step is to figure out if the JVM is running reasonably well.
You can do this by timing HelloWorld.
Here's what I get on my system:
export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lpp/java14/IBM/J1.4
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 10:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: BCTR out of favor?
While we're on the subject of machine performance .
Do I recall correctly
In a recent note, Knutson, Sam said:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:57:18 -0400
Good point. Is this something that should be raised against the Binder
as a requirement for load modules? It doesn't seem like anyone who
wants to do this should have to use anything besides IBM HLASM and
Charles Mills wrote:
Do I recall correctly hearing that BCTR Rn,0 is no longer the favored way
of
decrementing a register, perhaps because the cache logic sees it as a
potential branch, and that AHI Rn,-1 should be substituted?
Seems unlikely to me. I'd think even the worst branch prediction
I have a CICS installation tape and I am trying to access the tape to
download a JOB through a JCL.
Before submitting the JCL I issued - d u,tape,online
RESPONSE=LCZOS4S
IEE457I 11.23.52 UNIT STATUS 395
UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE
Jerry,
Are you running on a ThinkPad using Flex, or on a real mainframe? The reason
I ask I am using a ThinkPad and Flex and I had the same problem some time ago
and found that I had to turn the tape dirve on and get the * in the window
before I turn the ThinkPAD on.
Ed.
After I submit the above JCL the JOB waits with the below message -
*IEF233A M 0590,R1076A,,EXTRACT,STEP01,SYS1.OS161076.DOCLIB
Then again I issue d u,tape,online -
RESPONSE=LCZOS4S
IEE457I 11.27.46 UNIT STATUS 402
UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER
That will round out each CSECT to a 4K multiple. Suppose you want to
link two or more CSECTs together and have the resultant *module* rounded
to a 4K boundary?
In the binder input, the PAGE csectname command will align that csect to
be loaded on a page boundary.
Also, the ORDER statement
ED thanks for your reply.. yes I run it in Think Pad which uses flexes.
please let me know what is the next step.
-Jerry
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
The current z/OS 1.7 program management manual defines this hierarchy as:
The reusability values are:
NONE The module cannot be reused. A new copy must be brought into virtual
storage for each use. NONE is the default value.
SERIAL The module is serially reusable. It can only be executed
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:41:06 EDT, Ed. Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry,
Are you running on a ThinkPad using Flex, or on a real mainframe? The reason
I ask I am using a ThinkPad and Flex and I had the same problem some time ago
and found that I had to turn the tape dirve on and get the * in
This was a known - and to my mind indefensible - issue with the z900
machines.
Been going on for years. Remember Sharp APL? Did a nasty STC into a following
branch
instruction and blew the pipeline to smithereens on the old NAS AS/9000 series.
Happened in a
tight and frequently used loop.
My understanding is that the design motivation was to be able to
re-fetch a REFR load module in case of detected physical damage
to a page. Either lost in a redesign, or never fully implemented.
It goes back at least as far as later versions of the 360/65 machine check
handler. I'm not
sure
Are you asking me to insert the tape? if so the tape is already inserted.
Are you asking me to issue any mount command ? If so I Issued - /M
590,VOL=(SL,R1076A),USE=PUBLIC
Again, I get this message in the log -
*41 IEF235D MOUNT 590 WAITING FOR VOLUMES.TO CANCEL WAIT REPLY 'NO'
Suggest me if
In a recent note, Bruce Black said:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:42:18 -0400
Also, the ORDER statement (which orders csects) has a P option to align
a specific csect on a page boundary. You can also use it to specify the
load module that follows it to fill in the rest of the page.
Since this is not an error situation, in the sense that there is an SDWA and
such to be recorded and RTM2 area to look at, what do I tell the slip process
to record such that I can go to the dump, and easily identify the task and PSW
that is walking on a piece of storage? The storage is in
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:00:09 -0500 David Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Since this is not an error situation, in the sense that there is an SDWA and
such to be recorded and RTM2 area to look at, what do I tell the slip process
to record such that I can go to the dump, and easily identify the
On REFR, when does a module ever get refreshed??
I can conceive of a real storage parity error, where the virtual page is
reassigned to a different real storage page, and the module that
occupied it refreshed. Is this true?
Are there any other reasons to refresh a module?
--
Bruce A.
Jerry,
You may have to very the drive offline on 1.6 in order to use it on 1.4. V
590,OFFLINE Put this command on 1.6 and V 590, ONLINE on the 1.4.
Ed.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
LS:
Cross post from MVS-OE
Currently I am in discussion with IBM about the design changes made, in
z/OS V1R6 and later, with the behavior of the USS MOUNT options UNMOUNT,
AUTOMOVE etc.
The new design, described in APAR OA12251, introduces problems in the area of
Dead System Recovery
In addition to what Mr. Wolf said, I would recommend getting up to a more
current version of the JVM (you're over a year out of date). I also saw a
thread on MVS-OE where you were discussing turning off JIT. You can try it
both ways. It is often rather unusual circumstances where you would
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to
bit.listserv.ibm-main,bit.listserv.vmesa-l,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it necessary to round to a page boundary, or only to a cache line
boundary? (Either is subject to
On 10/23/2006 4:31 AM, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
Now consider the following:
We have modules that try to improve performance by doing complex computations
only once.
The modules are RENT, because they are used in a dialog environment.
This is usually implemented by having a static pointer
I recently received a storm of rejections from yahoo.com
about non-existent accounts. I've spent the last 20 minutes
removing them from IBM-MAIN. And then I got to:
---
Subject: Delivery failure
Message from yahoo.ca.
Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
snip
[EMAIL
Well what you say about the assembler list makes a certain amount of sense,
but I would assert that it is not actually an assembler question -- the
question would be equally relevant if I were a masochist coding in machine
language or were writing a compiler -- it has nothing to do with the
Hi.
I thought that if a dset is cataloged to MIGRAT1, I could just select it
and it would be recalled. (??) Isn't that the way it should work?? We do
not use HSM, we use FDR.
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Bruce,
I did a tape offline on z/OS 1.4 and then tried with z/OS 1.6 I get the same
error.
Now the status is -
RESPONSE=LCZOS4S
IEE457I 12.51.24 UNIT STATUS 443
UNIT TYPE STATUSVOLSER VOLSTATE
0590 3490 A-MTP-R R1076A
Charles Mills wrote:
Well what you say about the assembler list makes a certain amount of sense,
but I would assert that it is not actually an assembler question -- the
question would be equally relevant if I were a masochist coding in machine
language or were writing a compiler -- it has
Do you have any command for me to try to clear this MountPending error?
Mount Pending is not an error, it means that z/OS does not think that
the tape is ready. You could try ejecting the tape and reentering it
(in general I would not enter the tape until you get the MOUNT message).
You
I thought that if a dset is cataloged to MIGRAT1, I could just select it
and it would be recalled. (??) Isn't that the way it should work?? We do
not use HSM, we use FDR.
Yes, that is the way it should work. What happens instead?
Carol, why aren't you calling us first on questions like
We had no problems other than the ones caused by me. DB2 V7 and V8
here.
___
Jim Petersen
MVS - Lead Systems Engineer
Home Depot Technology Center
1300 Park Center Drive, Austin, TX 78753
www.homedepot.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
512-977-2615
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:43:36 -0700 Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:It certainly seemed reasonable to me that a CPU could tell the difference
:between BCTR Rn,0 and BCTR Rn,not_zero but I thought I had heard the
:opposite somewhere.
I would be quite surprised if there wasn't an assist for
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
I would be quite surprised if there wasn't an assist for BCTR Rx,0.
Why on earth would you think that such a simple instruction would need
an assist?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
In a message dated 10/23/2006 1:06:40 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Carol, why aren't you calling us first on questions like this?? We
love to talk gr
Or cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) ???
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:18:06 -0700 Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Binyamin Dissen wrote:
: I would be quite surprised if there wasn't an assist for BCTR Rx,0.
:Why on earth would you think that such a simple instruction would need
:an assist?
Early detection of target register zero.
jorge garcia said:
but HCM only display the not installed ports and the
hardware status field doesn't appear in it.
It's a mistake. I wanted to say HCM only display the installed ports and
the hardware status field doesn't appear in it.
Sorry.
Jorge García Juanino
Técnico de
SVCDUMP will write data to an SQA resident buffer, pointed to by
CVT+24C. This environment data. At offset 8 is an EBCDIC field
containing REGS, followed by (R0-R15) the GPR contents. After the
registers is the an EBCDIC PSW followed by the PSW, then the PASD,
SASD and ARS.
Wayne Driscoll
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Aaron Walker
In addition to what Mr. Wolf said, I would recommend getting
up to a more current version of the JVM (you're over a year
out of date).
Yeah, I noticed that, too.
I also saw a thread on MVS-OE
LLA is Linklist Look-Aside.
???
Isn't it Library Look-Aside?
It is now.
It came out as LINKLIST with XA.
When they changed it to manage other libraries, they changed it to LIBRARY.
And, added VLF.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:03:14 -0400, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you have any command for me to try to clear this MountPending error?
Mount Pending is not an error, it means that z/OS does not think that
the tape is ready. You could try ejecting the tape and reentering it
(in
On Monday, 10/23/2006 at 01:41 EST, Jorge Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I wanted to say HCM only display the installed ports and
the hardware status field doesn't appear in it.
HCM is only going to show you what is in the I/O configuration, not what
is physically installed. If you have a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Ragland
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape access problem
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:03:14 -0400, Bruce Black
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:18:06 -0700 Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Binyamin Dissen wrote:
: I would be quite surprised if there wasn't an assist for BCTR Rx,0.
:Why on earth would you think that such a simple instruction would need
:an assist?
Early detection
gotcha. :-)
Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
10/23/2006 02:35 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: MIGRAT1 Dset
Carol, why aren't you calling us first
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 1:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Java/LE Tuning Advice sought
snip
To turn on verbose garbage collection (low overhead and very
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 11:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is the teaching of non-reentrant HLASM coding practices ever
defensible?
In a recent note,
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
for some trivia ... one of the people in the following meeting claimed
to have been primary person handling sql/ds
Ok, here is a very basic question:
When I code the FILESEQ number on a Tape - it failes if I used hi order zeros.
So it will not take 0001 but will take 1. I did not remember this being a
restriction in JCL. At what point in the converter code would look at this and
not like 0001.
Hi Folks
We are having abend's within HSM (ABARS) and with JOBS doing Full pack
dumps , looking at Logrec I see :
JOBNAME: HSMSYSTEM NAME: RC14
ERRORID: SEQ=42786 CPU= ASID=0137 TIME=21:00:00.1
Yes, you could probably take that gibberish and convert it from ascii to
ebcdic and read it (iconf -f ISO8849-1 -t IBM-1047 file new-file).
I didn't see the end of that message. It's running JBOSS. I'll see what's
required for that. I wonder if Mr. Wolf has any experience with JBoss
(with
David Day wrote on 10/23/2006 01:00:09 PM:
Since this is not an error situation, in the sense that there is an
SDWA and such to be recorded and RTM2 area to look at, what do I
tell the slip process to record such that I can go to the dump, and
easily identify the task and PSW that is walking
On 10/23/2006 11:48 AM, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Knutson, Sam wrote:
If you want to round out the modules to allow you to page protect them
perhaps something like this instead of the special link edit procedure.
*
LTORG ,
*
* round this module to a page boundary for page protect
Hmm, that is a strange one, especially since I just looked in my ancient
os/390 2.10 JCL reference manual and it actually shows using
LABEL=(0001,)
Just for kicks, does it still complain if you take out the extra commas?
I just tried (on z/OS 1.4) to run and it didn't complain. What error
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:51:15 -0400 Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:Ok, here is a very basic question:
:When I code the FILESEQ number on a Tape - it failes if I used hi order
zeros. So it will not take 0001 but will take 1. I did not remember this
being a restriction in JCL. At
Jerry,
When you started the ThinkPad was the tape drive already in a ready status
with the * in the tape drive window? That worked for me a couple of years ago.
Ed.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
A recent post caught my attention about a Java program being run from
from a UNIX shell getting tired after the first execution. TSO is set
up so that each TSO transaction is known to WLM, so that it resets to
first period. Does anybody know if the UNIX shell does the same? If not,
doesn't that
To everyone that responded, Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
In a recent note, Lizette Koehler said:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:51:15 -0400
Ok, here is a very basic question:
When I code the FILESEQ number on a Tape - it failes if I used hi order
zeros. So it will not take 0001 but will take 1. I did not remember this
being a
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:55:09 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A recent post caught my attention about a Java program being run from
from a UNIX shell getting tired after the first execution. TSO is set
up so that each TSO transaction is known to WLM, so that it resets to
first period.
We are z/OS 1.7
The story we heard was that a couple of digits had been accidentally
transposed in the SRM interval 'table' for z9s...hence the issue. But that
it had brought to light that maybe the SRM intervals haven't been adjusted
appropriately in recent times to take into account processor
I'd thought I'd read about doing this somewhere. We have a d/l of a large
database occurring monthly and it would require something like this.
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Thomas Lawrence wrote:
I'd thought I'd read about doing this somewhere. We have a d/l of a large
database occurring monthly and it would require something like this.
Thanks.
I am assuming you are talking about z/OS. z/OS can NOT be SAMBA
client. It can be a SAMBA server. Which means you
A recent post caught my attention about a Java program being run from from a
UNIX shell getting tired after the first execution.
UNIX transactions are, in general, like TSO transactions.
So, yes they get tired, unless the WLM sees them as new transactions, then
they start over.
UNIX under TSO
In a recent note, John S. Giltner, Jr. said:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:53:47 -0400
I am not sure if z/OS can be a NFS client, I know it can be a NFS server.
It can; we do it extensively.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
In response to Ed's
-Original Message-
That will round out each CSECT to a 4K multiple. Suppose you want to
link two or more CSECTs together and have the resultant *module*
rounded
to a 4K boundary?
Sam replied
Good point. Is this something that should be raised against the
Binder
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
NFS is one way. We use it from time to time but it is response time
sensitive to and parameter sensitive, so it might not be to responsive.
Another way is to use your disk hardware. EMC and HDS can share disk
volumes. We use Hitachi HRX to share devices between MF Windows (but
it works with Unix
98 matches
Mail list logo
