But some devices, such as BSC do not support dynamic in which case you need to
IPL with the IODF that excludes these devices. What is the device type of 0161?
- Original Message -
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent:
0161 is a return code from HCD...yes some of device type = 3286 does
not support the dymanic delete
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Field, Alan
C.alan.c.fi...@supervalu.com wrote:
But some devices, such as BSC do not support dynamic in which case you need
to IPL with the IODF that excludes
Is there any other way , where i can include all the statements from the JOB
(JOB, PROCLIB, INLCUDE and SET etc ) in the new edited job?
IEBEDIT is not going to work on PROC's as well , as they dont contain a JOB
statement !
My actual requirement is to do a selective omission of particular
I believe that x'4D' and x'5D' are the CP1047 standard brackets. (x'AD'
and x'BD' are square brackets). I looked on
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pcomhelp/v5r9/index.jsp?topic=/
com.ibm.pcomm.doc/reference/html/hcp_reference27.htm which seems to
confirm that.
I changed my code page in
Hi,
With regards to Is there any other way , where i can include all the
statements from the JOB (JOB, PROCLIB, INLCUDE and SET etc ) in the new
edited job?
IEBEDIT is not going to work on PROC's as well , as they dont contain a JOB
statement !
My actual requirement is to do a selective
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 00:43 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
c) Don't even get me started on Java applications running on z/OS.
In fairness, it should be noted that java is a pox in _all_
environments.
And now that Larry E has added it as another (no doubt) nice little
future revenue earner, things
We have synchronous from A to B and asynchronous from A to C.
Sounds just what you want to do.
Terry Draper
zSeries Performance Consultant
w...@btopenworld.com
mobile: +966 556730876
--- On Tue, 2/6/09, Michael Saraco michael.sar...@baer-consulting.com wrote:
From: Michael Saraco
Hello:
We need to send a STC sysout by SMTP and we leave this sysout in Q class
in the spool (the class isn't important).
When the SMTP STC try to process this sysout this message appears:
$HASP186 HZSPRINT OUTGRP=2.1.1 NOT SELECTED BY STC08510/SMTP.SMTP
DUE
721
Can anyone tell me how WLM decides which service class to assign to CICS
Subsystem ?
I have following Classification Rules defined in system.
For the type CICS following are the entries :
Qualifier Qualifier Starting Service Report
# type name position Class
Actually I am perfectly happy with the rc=4 - I used
bypass(systemhold(action)) for 1 ptf that wanted me to know there was
help information. 8 would bother me. I am just concerned that my jcl got
too, way too complicated. After the memo to users, memo to users
extension, the program directory
Audit the SMTP stc userid and then look in SMF. No better way.
Itschak
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Jorge Garcia jgarc...@mapfre.com wrote:
Hello:
We need to send a STC sysout by SMTP and we leave this sysout in Q class
in the spool (the class isn't important).
When the SMTP STC try to
Yes, Rexx or any other Programming language was an option in my mind
initially.
It would require lot of checks to ensure that a line is legal within a JCL.
Say for Ex, Determining the Start and end of a JOBSTEP is a big challenge
especially, if there any instream data in the JOB.
The other
Jorge Garcia wrote:
When the SMTP STC try to process this sysout this message appears:
$HASP186 HZSPRINT OUTGRP=2.1.1 NOT SELECTED BY
STC08510/SMTP.SMTP DUE TO SECURITY POLICY
Try $TDEBUG,SECURITY=YES and after fixing your problem do it with NO.
The STC SMTP starts with STCSYS group and the
Thanks for the advice. I got those lines from the smppunch output from a smp
report errorsysmods job.
//* GDE: CBPDO MEMO EXTENSION
//* DOC: This job will perform the SMP/E REPORT ERRSYSMODS command
//* for HOLDDATA
Barbara Nitz wrote:
I am one of those who hate UNIX on z/OS. Here's why:
2. A pain with regard to system controls.
a) USS is expected to be exempt from all controls MVS has - look at iefusi and
the huge warnings surrounding it if you *DON'T* give a USS address space
what it wants! Same
Tidy, David (D) wrote:
I believe that x'4D' and x'5D' are the CP1047 standard brackets. (x'AD'
and x'BD' are square brackets). I looked on
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pcomhelp/v5r9/index.jsp?topic=/
com.ibm.pcomm.doc/reference/html/hcp_reference27.htm which seems to
confirm that.
I can understand the reason for those IEFUSI warnings. Java!
Well, the warnings for IEFUSI were there long before Java came along. And it
was only the precursor for things to come.
Also those of us who compile using the C/C++ compiler in USS need a lot of
memory because the compiler is a memory
You seem to run CICS itself as STC (as oposed to running it as
a batch job). So, the CICS region gets classified by the STC rules.
Later when CICS classifies transactions, they get classified by the
CICS rules.
HTH
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barbara Nitz
I can understand the reason for those IEFUSI warnings. Java!
Well, the warnings for IEFUSI were there long before Java came along.
And it
was only the precursor for things to come.
Also those of us
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
nitz-...@gmx.net (Barbara Nitz) writes:
My point of contention is that most of the 'programmers' (That's why I called
that 'clicking') don't care that their code is poor. My neighbour
We have considered raising it, however we would really like to figure out
whats going on and if it is in fact ESP (we are contacting them). For a
single A/S to be using more than 80% of a 16K table for enq/deq seems a bit
excessive. We are concerned about what will happen when we roll this into
Hello:
I'm trying to find a way to translate this REXX instruction to
a CLIST equivalent :SAY '/' || STRIP(' AA-BB ') || '/'
I'm trying to remove the leading and trailing spaces, which may
or may not be present in the string.
All the CLIST equivalent solutions I found so far are more
Try the following: SAY '/'STRIP('AA-BB','B')'/'
Thanks,
Ray Baraniecki
Morgan Stanley GWMG
18th Floor
1 New York Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Office - 212-276-5641
Cell - 917-597-5692
ray.baranie...@morganstaley.com
BE CARBON CONSCIOUS. PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE
Gilbert,
Try this:
PROC 0
CONTROL MSG LIST CON
SET X = STR( AA-BB )
SET NEWX = STR()
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:32:54 +0200 Gilbert Saint-Flour usenet5...@yahoo.com
wrote:
:I'm trying to find a way to translate this REXX instruction to
:a CLIST equivalent :SAY '/' || STRIP(' AA-BB ') || '/'
:I'm trying to remove the leading and trailing spaces, which may
:or may not be
Can't test it, but if I recall correctly, assignment will remove
leading/trailing blanks. If the literal is already stored in a variable, say
B, you can SET A=B to remove all blanks. From your sample, it is clear that
you don't need a strip for a literal written in your own program, so I
assumed
Hello all, I know this is old hat to some, but I thought I would ask
anyway. I'm sure it's been asked here before, but we might have some new
members that may be able to help. I'm looking for a copy OS/VS1, tapes,
manuals, etc... I would like to get a vanilla VS1 Release 7.0 system
without BPE,
Has anyone experienced all dynamic PAV activity just stopping?
RMF reports are showing me that there have been zero changes to our alias
assignments for the past couple weeks. Lickily our PAVs are currently spread
out enough over the production UCBs that we have not had terrible
performance
Barbara Nitz wrote:
Also those of us who compile using the C/C++ compiler in USS need a lot of
memory because the compiler is a memory hog when optimizing. It's no
different when compiling using batch.
Not to mention a cpu hog.
That's why we suggest doing those compiles with our C/C++
Hi All
For the achieve our problem was related to a 3rd party product.
Stopped the product and all is working , we will follow-up with the
vendor.
Regards
Gerard Ceruti
may the 'z' be with you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Hi,
With regards to Is there detailed documentation, which indicates the
PARAMETERS not supported by IEBEDIT utility ?
IF i have that information, it would serve as a good input to proceed
further with this uitlity or not , depending the formats my JOBS are in !!
I suspect that there may not be
Barbara Nitz's masterful rant snipped
Barbara, you are my hero. You are a goddess. I want to be you when (if)
I grow up.
Well said, madam, well said.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer Network Operations
Phone: (703)
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:32:54 +0200, Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to translate this REXX instruction to
a CLIST equivalent ...
Why?
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Elardus:
It' right. First I've activate the debug and show a different profile
(*.*.**).
We give access ALTER to this profile in JESSPOOL class and execute it.
Thanks a lot!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Barbara Nitz
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 12:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why are z/OS people reluctant to use z/OS UNIX?
I am one of those who hate UNIX on z/OS.
Dave Butts dave.w.bu...@lowes.com wrote in message
news:listserv%200906040916525513.0...@bama.ua.edu...
Has anyone experienced all dynamic PAV activity just stopping?
RMF reports are showing me that there have been zero changes to our
alias
assignments for the past couple weeks. Lickily
Try the following: SAY '/'STRIP('AA-BB','B')'/'
SAY is not a CLIST construct.
WRITE (or WRITENR) are the CLIST equivalents.
And, as the OP stated, STRIP is not a CLIST function.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
Has anyone experienced all dynamic PAV activity just stopping?
Check both your IODF WLM policy.
Both have to have PAV turned on.
If one doesn't, then it won't be active.
We implemented dynamic, aeons ago, in the following manner:
1. Assign one alias to each volume (we had enough at the time).
The MCLs were applied on May 2.
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:47:59 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
kees.vern...@klm.com wrote:
When was your MCL upgrade?
Our last upgrade was first half of April and I still see PAVs moving.
Kees.
--
Hi,
With regard to my earlier suggestion of perhaps adding a second step to
execute a REXX routine to uncomment INCLUDE and SET statements after IEBEDIT
has processed them.
A test run using both IEBEDIT INCLUDE and EXCLUDE reveals that such a step
is not particularly helpful, as the comment
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Thomas David Rivers
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why are z/OS people reluctant to use z/OS UNIX?
Barbara Nitz wrote:
Also those
In a message dated 6/4/2009 10:02:53 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
kees.vern...@klm.com writes:
When was your MCL upgrade?
Our last upgrade was first half of April and I still see PAVs moving.
Parts is parts. Guess we need to know more info.
z9---z/CHPIDs---z/Controller
MCL
Type and
Hello List - This question was posed to me and I would assume there would be
a way to do it, but I do not know how. I seek the knowledge of the list to
answer it if possible.
A DBA wants to know if there is a way to request the execution of an oracle
stored procedure on another server from
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Thomas David Rivers
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why are z/OS people reluctant to use z/OS UNIX?
Barbara Nitz wrote:
There should be many potential ways. It would mostly depend on the limitations
of the target server. I'd probably start with a batch executed REXX procedure
that would telnet (or ssh) to the target server, execute commands, and parse
the result.
There is a remote execute facility I'd also
Thanks, Will. Sounds like the way to go. Now, if I could get someone to respond
with more details such as a shipping address
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
William Donzelli
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 12:50 PM
To:
It's interesting to link (trade) settlements to overnight batch COBOL.
That's not really an option(sic) in today's trading world - you need to
support same day settlements and various intraday business functions. This
type of need would be reflected in a multitude of business functions
From the bitsavers.org web page:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Would you like to help bitsavers?
We're looking for documentation and software for
minicomputers and mainframes, from the 50's to the 80's.
email aek at
bitsavers dot org if you can help.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Brian
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:22:08 -0500, Hal
Hi,
would anyone know if there is a Jes exit that gets control after the User Asid
Has been
created
Joseph Reichman
Senior Programmer
(914) 785 - 1034
_
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential
and may be privileged. It is intended for the
Tried that. No response to date.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Brian Peterson
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: OPTICA ESCON to Bus / Tag Converters.
From the bitsavers.org
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:27:57 -0400 Joseph Reichman reichm...@emigrant.com
wrote:
: would anyone know if there is a Jes exit that gets control after the User
Asid Has been
:created
The user asid is an initiator, which is created before a job is selected.
What are you trying to do?
--
Binyamin
PTFs UA47565 for 1.9 UA47566 for 1.10 now available.
http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA27037
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
System z Performance and Availability Management
mailto:sknut...@geico.com
the intiator TCB or JobStep Tcb is created by Jes I believe
Joseph Reichman
Senior Programmer
(914) 785 - 1034
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com 6/4/2009 12:35 PM
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:27:57 -0400 Joseph Reichman reichm...@emigrant.com
wrote:
: would anyone know if there is a Jes
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:38:35 -0400 Joseph Reichman reichm...@emigrant.com
wrote:
:the intiator TCB or JobStep Tcb is created by Jes I believe
Still not clear what you want.
Perhaps exit32. Perhaps IEFUJI/IEFUSI.
What are you trying to do?
: Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com 6/4/2009
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
bjpafr...@hotmail.com (Brendan Friel) writes:
It's interesting to link (trade) settlements to overnight batch COBOL.
That's not really an option(sic) in today's trading world - you
Joseph Reichman
Senior Programmer
(914) 785 - 1034
Joseph Reichman 6/4/2009 1:13 PM
Ok thankx
I explain in a little while
thankx
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com 6/4/2009 12:55 PM
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:38:35 -0400 Joseph Reichman reichm...@emigrant.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Jes2 Exit
Hi,
would anyone know if there is a Jes exit that gets control
after the
Contacting ESP is the right approach. We cap the number of ENQs any one
space can obtain. This limit is in place to prevent a runaway program from
utilizing all the storage in the GRS address space. This limit is
customizable either at the address space level via the ISGADMIN API, or at
the system
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Anne Lynn Wheeler
[ snip ]
somewhat as a result of the electronic commerce and x9.59 work, we
were
invited into NSCC (since merged with DTC for DTCC) to look at doing
something similar for all trading
You should explain to your auditors: anyoine can give any name they like
to any program. The FUNCTION and CAPABILITIES of a program are FAR more
important than the name. Is it APF authorized? is the loadlib APF
authorized? Without proper authorization, with respect to z/OS rules,
it's not very
I understand completely; BTDTGTSS.
IEBEDIT will do that, but you should open a PMR with IBM, with the
intent of getting support for INCLUDE/SET/IF/THEN/ELSE statements. That
particular utility probably hasn't even been examined since the days of
OS/360.
SUBSCRIBE vignesh wrote:
Is there
Respectfully, what you suggest is futile.
A path that may (or may not) be worth pursuing is to try to pry loose exactly
what the auditors really want. What I'm seeing is that the auditors perceive a
potential exposure and then they try to come up with some way to mitigate the
issue. Never
All that and, maybe it's just personally visceral, but I am not fond of
alp -H -a bet so | up
I'm sure when I'm again required to be more practiced in *nix, hopefully
zLinux is on the horizon, I'll find the old brain cells from my unix
days in college :)
Dave Gibney
Information Technology
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:16:52 -0500, Dave Butts dave.w.bu...@lowes.com wrote:
Has anyone experienced all dynamic PAV activity just stopping?
RMF reports are showing me that there have been zero changes to our alias
assignments for the past couple weeks. Lickily our PAVs are currently spread
out
LS,
More important is your IOSQ time increasing ? Are the number of PAV adresses
insufficient ?
2009/6/4 Dave Butts dave.w.bu...@lowes.com
Has anyone experienced all dynamic PAV activity just stopping?
RMF reports are showing me that there have been zero changes to our alias
assignments for
More important is your IOSQ time increasing ? Are the number of PAV adresses
insufficient ?
The OP said he was fine, for now.
But, I/O patterns do change, over the day, and over time.
I still think the IODF and the WLM policy should be checked to see if it's
enabled in both.
It may be; it is
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:03:01 -0600, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
...
Ah! Maybe part of the problem is language. In [American] English:
( and ) are parentheses
{ and } are braces (not curly braces, just braces)
[ and ] are brackets (not square brackets, just brackets)
Does anyone know how non-IBM device support modules are names? I need to
determine whether a system has any device support modules in it that were
not supplied by IBM. eg, how are they named to avoid conflict with IBM
supplied ones. It must be documented somewhere, but I haven't found it.
Indeed, and that may be exactly what happened: a change to the workload
eliminated or reduced volume contention such that PAV redistribution is no
longer needed.
AFAIK, WLM will move a PAV only when it believes that doing so will help some
workload that is not meeting its goals.
Perhaps the information you seek is in the MVS Device Validation Support
Manual.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/iea2g610.pdf
Dave Waldman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
The doc is in SA22-7586 MVS Device Validation Support. Appendix C
contains a list of IBM supplied UIMs.
Chuck Arney
illustro Systems International, LLC
http://www.illustro.com
Internet-enable your applications with z/Ware V2
Voice: 214-800-8900 X#5562
--
This e-mail is private and may be
Indeed, and that may be exactly what happened: a change to the workload
eliminated or reduced volume contention such that PAV redistribution is no
longer needed.
I didn't say a change to the workload.
I said a change to WLM or IODF.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Ah, but you did:
But, I/O patterns do change, over the day, and over time.
And I agree with that as well the rest of your excellent advise.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:18:11 -0400, Thomas David Rivers
riv...@dignus.com wrote:
...
That's why we suggest doing those compiles with our C/C++ compiler
running in IBM compatibility mode on a local workstation... saves
a lot of memory CPU.. and, if you are being billed for those,
it can save a
Ah, but you did:
But, I/O patterns do change, over the day, and over time.
And I agree with that as well the rest of your excellent advise.
I guess I wasn't clear.
I find it difficult to believe that not a single PAV was re-assigned in a month.
That was the purpose of my 'pattern' statement.
Is there a way to tell that large page support is really available other
than checking CVTEDAT and scanning the IPA for LFAREA= (something other
than 0M)?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO
Also those of us who compile using the C/C++ compiler in USS need a lot
of
memory because the compiler is a memory hog when optimizing. It's no
different when compiling using batch.
Not to mention a cpu hog.
It's true, our compiler can take up a lot of memory and cpu. We provide
several
Yea, we checked the IODF and the WLM policy. No changes there. Last IODF
change was earlier in April and everything is still set for PAV in there and in
the WLM policy.
I liked the idea of reactivating the policy, but I checked and we have
activated new policies with minor changes a couple
Do you have HyperPAV implemented?
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Dave Butts
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:17 AM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Kelly Arrey
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 3:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why are z/OS people reluctant to use z/OS UNIX?
Also those of us who compile using the C/C++ compiler
Allocate a one-MB object above the bar, page fix it, get the 64-bit real
address of the starting virtual address, the 64-bit real address of the
starting virtual address +4K, and off bits 51-63 (with a mask of
X'E000') of both addresses, and compare the two real addresses that
are
I always forget a few details. Before doing the page fix, make your address
space non-swappable if it is not already. After the compare, delete the object
and make your address space swappable if it was originally swappable.
Bill Fairchild
Software Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 06/04/2009
04:31:36 PM:
Allocate a one-MB object above the bar, page fix it, get the 64-bit
real address of the starting virtual address, the 64-bit real
address of the starting virtual address +4K, and off bits 51-63
(with a
z/OS 1.8 RMM Install and Cus manual talks about EDGUTIL and
EDGHSKP synching but it does not make clear exactly WHAT is Synch'd to
WHAT.
In my case I am trying to synch my MVS USER CATALOGs to a MORE
recent (ie more up to date) RMM CDS. I had spoken with and IBM tech about
a
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:31:36 -0400 Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com wrote:
:Allocate a one-MB object above the bar, page fix it, get the 64-bit real
address of the starting virtual address, the 64-bit real address of the
starting virtual address +4K, and off bits 51-63 (with a mask of
Considering the number of times the application code will be executed in
production, the cpu time invested in optimizing it can be time well spent.
YES! 100%
As a capacity analyst since 1981, I've fought the battle of the compiler vs the
execution.
Run the compiler steps in a low priority
Good!
All I said was: check it out!
Never said it was the issue.
Yea, we checked the IODF and the WLM policy. No changes there.
Last IODF change was earlier in April and everything is still set for PAV in
there and in
the WLM policy.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
My RMM guy said yes, there is a CATSYNC process. But he also was not sure what
gets synch'd to what. A missing catalog entry, for example, could cause that
tape to be scratched.
But he suggested that there should be some parameters that would express your
wishes to RMM.
-Original
On 4 Jun 2009 08:27:53 -0700, ptl...@midamerican.com (Patrick Lyon) wrote:
A DBA wants to know if there is a way to request the execution of an
oracle
stored procedure on another server from the mainframe and have the result
return to the mainframe.
If you install the Oracle client libraries
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:51:43 -0400, Jim Mulder d10j...@us.ibm.com wrote:
You may be able to infer something from:
BROWSESYS1.MODGEN(IARRCE)
RCEReconLFASize DS 0D Size of the Reconfigurable @M2A
* Large Frame Area in Megabytes @M2A
In my experience, many, if not most, auditors trigger on program name,
rather than asking about function and capabilities. Somebody told them
that XYZ is a bad program, therefore, any program of that name is bad,
without regard to where it's located or its actual function/capabilities.
Hal
Apologies in advance, this is going all over the map... and, I don't intend to
offend anyone's sensibilities (I'm an avid mainframe guy, but I am tempered by
an effort to understand how things came to be). Hopefully this will spark more
thought and questions than religious railing.
DB2 was
Yep, Hal, there should be come parameters, but I can find
neither the parms, nor an adequate explanation in the doc. Using Google I
found that RMM at zOS 1.9+ will output the update commands created by
MEND(SMSTAPE) so that one may actually LOOK at what is being done before
jumping
Jim, a completely different question: can you give us any idea or hint
when we can expect to use executable code above the bar?
In my shop, we have programs that are executed literally thousands of
times per day and program fetch is a significant part of the time
involved. Adding these
exit32
seems to be it it runs Environ user so. Its runs in the User Address space
Beofre the Jobs runs it the Adress space has been created probably all other
revelent
control blocks have been created
CDE's etc
PSAAOLD as that time should be the User Addrss Space
-Original
You may be able to use FTP to issue a command to start the Oracle
process, and then GET back a file with the results.
David Stephens
Lead Systems Programmer
d...@longpelaexpertise.com.au
www.longpelaexpertise.com.au
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/images/logo.gif
Ph. 0404 757 821 (from
Hi all,
I try to started a system task APPC with SUB=MSTR but can't find the
owner/user or jobid information even we defined a started task to
APPC.* . How can we assign a owner to this system task?
Any help will be appreciated
Rick,
You don't need full fledged executable code above the bar for what you have
described.
You could use the SHARE/UNSHARE functions of IARVSERV added to IARV64 - in
other
words a 64-bit IARVSERV (i.e., captured storage grande).
That could be a WHOLE lot easier for IBM to ship than
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
st...@trainersfriend.com (Steve Comstock) writes:
That's the other windmill I'm tilting at these days:
the benefits of insourcing - using local people for
local work. Working to once
99 matches
Mail list logo
