Hi
With a danger of hijacking this thread I am diverting from the original
topic to address Raju's concerns
Raj Mathur wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>I feel that it makes sense to bring in larger issues of social change
>where they can have an impact on the issue at hand; however
> 3. Perhaps I don't need to respond to the remark
> about women having to
> accept men as they are- it has been responded to.
> But I just want to
> make the point that it is the kind of remark that is
> enough to make a
> woman want to withdraw from the list. No woman is
> obliged to accept any
At 2005-08-22 10:30:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> One thing which we can very clearly disregard is the possibility
> that the list is not interested.
Right.
Enough people are interested in solving the problem that rehashing the
argument will just give the disinclined more rope to waste e
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:55, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 2:32 pm, Raj Mathur wrote:
> Actually Raj, now that I have re-read it, I agree with Hassath that it is
> *potentially* offensive to women. While it might be perceived as humorous to
> men, it appears condescending t
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 16:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> But it always helps to have the "other" around. In fact the more others
> the better it will get I hope
>
> ram
>
Thanks Ram. At any rate, I am not interested in exchanging insults and
accusations.(It's not a woman's way, honestly ;-))
- Forwarded message from Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Oryx Mailstore 0.97
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:48:35 +0200 (CEST)
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
Hassath wrote:
> Like i said, I brought up the issue cos
> i thought the list
> was actually interested in changes. If it isn't,
> then sorry- I take my
> hands off.
One thing which we can very clearly disregard is the
possibility that the list is not interested. I'm sure
this discuss
--- Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check this as well:
> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
And how would anyone know about that if Google doesnt show the pages
from there ?
Try searching for "mere paas ClusterKnoppix hai" on google which should
show this page
http
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 9:41 pm, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
>
> My only concern is that there is no easy way to search the mailing
> lists "effectively". Google provide a effective search tool sourceforge
> doesnt.
How about trying the gmane archive instead?
- Sandip
--
Sandip Bhattacharya *
--- Raj Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They're indexed as far as I can make out:
>
http://www.google.com/search?q=linux-india-help+raj+mathur&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
Simple example
http://sourceforge.net/maila
> "Mithun" == Mithun Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mithun> Hi, I was wondering whether there is any consious
Mithun> decission not to allow the mailing lists to be indexed by
Mithun> the search engines. There has been quite a few emails I
Mithun> would like to refer
Hi,
I was wondering whether there is any consious decission not to allow
the mailing lists to be indexed by the search engines. There has been
quite a few emails I would like to refer back to but I find them
impossible to find on google atleast.
I believe we have a pretty decent sized archive of
Couple of things that can be done are as follows :
1. You use suexec and take let AMS have fun with his bots.
2. You do a sudo and have the same problem as above. In both cases you
just hope there are no bugs in your implementation which would result
in your system being hacked or made useless lon
At 2005-08-22 03:54:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Well I HAVE BEEN CATCALLED N WISTLED BY GROUP OF WOMEN UNKNOWN TO ME
OH MY GOD! THOSE SHAMELESS HUSSIES!
How *dare* they complain about oppression or exclusion?!
> Women just need to jump in and get the language "barrier" resolved
> duri
Just one quibble in isolation:
At 2005-08-22 15:33:13 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Sigh. See how difficult being politically correct all the time is?
Sandeep, it's not about being politically correct. At all. Ever.
Everyone thinks political correctness is ridiculous, including women,
disa
> If you are using Firefox then have a look at Adblock extenstion and load
> a filterset from Filterset.G (http://www.pierceive.com/)
Thanks... it worked!
Nandz.
--
http://nandz.blogspot.com
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://
At 2005-08-22 14:32:26 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Perhaps people who have had prior experience with gender issues can
> come forth and give inputs, or be blunt and specific when some line
> is crossed.
Blunt and specific. OK, I can do that. :-)
> At the moment we're all sitting around ag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Ram" == ramnarayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ram> [snip]
Ram> Again why somebody with experience - why make someone else
Ram> responsible for the clean up - is this clean up going to be
Ram> restricted to the list - thats o
hi,
the first thing that comes to mind is that if the bsnl
adsl device is connected to the switch directly then
it has to be a router. I believe bsnl is giving away
huawei routers with some connections.
if this is the case then you dont have to do anything
other than setting both pcs to dhcp as the
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:33, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
> On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 1:19 pm, hassath wrote:
> Hassath, let us discuss this without getting bitter. I understand the
> frustation, and I do agree with AMS that atmosphere in the LUG meets is
> something that will make women (or children
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >Nitin Chandra wrote:
> >
> >--if i may add the fourth option
> >
> >where by women can accept men as they are and STILL
> >come forward and make a difference rather than "be
> in
> >the stand and comment".
> >
>
> Well thats the stand
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 3:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sandip this bitterness - which you see - is not being able to get an
> important issue across. Check out the number of typical male mails
As I said, I understand the reason behind the bitterness, but being bitter
never helps in having a g
At 2005-08-22 02:48:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> where by women can accept men as they are and STILL come forward
> and make a difference rather than "be in the stand and comment".
Which nicely removes all responsibility from you, and allows you to say,
with a straight face, that the pro
>
> Hassath
>
>
>On the other hand, perhaps they need to hear more of the "other"
>perspective...
>
>Regards,
>
>
But it always helps to have the "other" around. In fact the more others
the better it will get I hope
ram
>___
>ilugd mailinglist --
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
>
> Well thats the standard arguement " accept us as we are ".
> So one is not expected to change for the better.
>
>
> men are abusive so let them be - accept them as they are
> men can harass women - accept that
> men can use crude
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
>Hassath, let us discuss this without getting bitter. I understand the
>frustation, and I do agree with AMS that atmosphere in the LUG meets is
>something that will make women (or children or any elderly people)
>uncomfortable.
>
>
>
Sandip this bitterness - which
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 2:32 pm, Raj Mathur wrote:
>
> Fair enough. The attempt at humour was supposed to achieve the
> reverse of what you are reading it as, but that doesn't make a
> difference in this context.
Actually Raj, now that I have re-read it, I agree with Hassath that it is
*potential
hassath wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:25, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
> If there is a result-less discussion, maybe you could take more
> responsibility for it- you too are part of this list. What a typically
> privileged attitude -" Oh, nothing comes out of these discussions!" If
> you saw it as bei
>
>
>Nitin Chandra wrote:
>
>--if i may add the fourth option
>
>where by women can accept men as they are and STILL
>come forward and make a difference rather than "be in
>the stand and comment".
>
Well thats the standard arguement " accept us as we are ".
So one is not expected to change for th
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 1:19 pm, hassath wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:25, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
> > I am neither discomforted by the discussion nor am I complacent, merely
> > un-interested in discussions without a result.
>
> If there is a result-less discussion, maybe you could take more
> re
>
> Fair enough. The attempt at humour was supposed to
> achieve the
> reverse of what you are reading it as, but that
> doesn't make a
> difference in this context.
>
> As I see it, we have two options open to us:
>
> - - Everyone introspect and figure out ways of doing
> things right so
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Hassath" == hassath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hassath> [snip]
Hassath> Thanks ams- i agree with all your points. I want to add
Hassath> another one, which i have mentioned in my response to
Hassath> Pankaj- the freedel blog
> "Pardeep" == Pardeep Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pardeep> hi, I get a license expire notice when I try to login
Pardeep> using cpanel on some remote server.
Pardeep> This is usually corrected within minutes but some cases
Pardeep> we may not be aware of the issue.
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:07, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2005-08-19 13:32:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > the prevailing atmosphere???
>
> Right. I can answer that question better now, mostly by having studied
> the responses in this thread. Let's have a look, shall we?
>
> 1. Denia
hi,
I get a license expire notice when I try to login using cpanel on some
remote server.
This is usually corrected within minutes but some cases we may not be
aware of the issue.
I don't know why it does this. sometimes it takes numerous tries to get
in.
Somebody help me about this matter??
Th
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:25, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
>
> I am neither discomforted by the discussion nor am I complacent, merely
> un-interested in discussions without a result.
If there is a result-less discussion, maybe you could take more
responsibility for it- you too are part of this list. Wh
36 matches
Mail list logo
