On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:42:40 -0600, Schmidgall, Jay wrote:
From: Alexander Mai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:59:26AM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote:
The given program doesn't react at all to keyboard
neither with LessTif nor Motif.
Hit the wrong key ...
Did
to this mailing list.
Thanks.
Fred
Yes, Xbae 4.8.4 or better (i.e. our current version from CVS)
should support TrueColor.
Our homepage http://www.lesstif.org offers more information
about downloads, CVS, etc.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch yet:
- if things are broken that way, your patch might have to be
enhanced to address the default=2.1 case?
- there's a 'ltversion' in our distribution which switches
your setup from one version to another. Quite useful sometimes!
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
any more.
Sigh. Any clues anyone ?
Not yet.
Except you might check whether the dmalloc support
works for you ...
(I first have to try getting dmalloc to work on my OS/2 system ...)
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 31 Mar 2001 18:18:39 +0100, Nix wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Alexander Mai said:
The LessTif Core Team is pleased to announce
Release 0.92.26
of the LessTif library!
automake-1.4d doesn't like it. Running CVSMake gives
,
| ./CVSMake running
| Autofoo in top
There are probably many more good ideas on this issue.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and not bound to either
the system or the Motif/LessTif libs)
More recent Xbae sources are available from our anon. CVS (see www.lesstif.org)
or (hopefully) soon in a new Xbae release.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 31 Mar 2001 19:11:49 +0100, Nix wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Alexander Mai spake:
Have you checked that your version works with both automake as
released and your version.
Not yet, no; will do.
I played with this stuff and was in the past quite sure that my hack
is ugly
for a Text widget ...
Too bad :-(
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 12:14:31PM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote:
Well, I still get NEdit to crash when I close the File Open dialog
(or Goto Line) but only on alpha-linux:
#0 0x2d8b4a0 in XCloseIM () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
#1 0x2455058 in XmImCloseXIM (w=0x120411820
of the main window the
buttons are resized properly.
Can someone come up with a quick fix before I have submit
a SF bug report for that? ;-)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GIF87ad ],MQ }}}uuu ,d Ik 6`(dihlp,p|pH,Ht9P(!JZvzxL.zniw~QJu
would have to adjust the headers.
What about lib/Xm-2.0/Xpm.c ?
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
report about libtool the examples.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this which also tells you how to fix.
(you won't need newuil anyway ...)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
try whether I could code such support.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
obviously.
3) There's still a problem left currently:
some examples fail to link/build if no libXpm is present/found.
Those should be disabled?!
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:00:57AM -0400, Rick Scott wrote:
On 26-Apr-01 at 05:52, Alexander Mai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Just applied some patches to lib/Xlt build mechanism.
1) drop libtool-based dependency on libXt and similar.
Unless we use new libtool which finally link share
no point in avoiding a standard
library like this. Actually if there will be some new requirements like
for sin() should we code them on our own? %-\
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the given file is referenced in the Makefile.am, but
missing in the cvs tree.
Did I introduce it recently or did it come by Danny's latest change?
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. I'm using autoconf/CVS meanwhile,
but I think I had this earlier, too. Do I have an obvious mistake in my
commandline?
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
archive?
From my point of view it's more likely that a flag turning on ANSI-compatible
mode of cc is missing than some of those famous #defines.
OTOH configure should dig out those patches?!
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think you should add this flag when running configure, e.g.
configure --prefix=myhomedir --enable-static
and see what happens.
If there are problems they will hopefully soon be addressed,
when we switch to the new libtool version.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
just some special case which triggers this bug, but I can't
give any details.
Best is to submit the report to our SF bug tracker (see our homepage)
and wait for a fix ...
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
case.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 03 May 2001 20:53:18 +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
Alexander Mai wrote:
lib/Dt/Makefile.am features:
includedir= $(prefix)/LessTif/Motif2.1/include/Dt
include_DATA= Print.h
Shouldn't this header be moved in our source tree to an according subdirectory
in include/Motif-2.1
The new mechanism to detect whether lib/Xlt is inside a lesstif source
tree seems to work with new autoconf/CVS.
I first had to eliminate some --cache-file from my batch to configure,
but finally got it right hopefully.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
applications with buttons, dialogs, etc...
Check out our website for the links entry and the related webpage.
Most helpful might the reference to the Motif FAQ.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bad ...
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 9 May 2001 18:23:05 +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2001-05-09 13:49 +0200, Alexander Mai wrote:
Webdesign is not our main focus, but I think to
some extent we can improve our existing pages.
So I created a frame'd version
Some people might object equating adding frames
/lesstif/lesstif/lib/Xlt/lib/FontChooser.c:421
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
should x-post to the bug-aut*@ lists, but I guess it won't
help much.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:35:37PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 01, Alexander Mai writes:
I just need to cry out somewhere ...
Again I am trying to get lesstif build on DU 4.0 w/o any explicit settings
in the environment. It seems those beloved auto* tools
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 02:11:07PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Alexander Mai wrote:
I just need to cry out somewhere ...
Note this ...
Again I am trying to get lesstif build on DU 4.0 w/o any explicit settings
in the environment. It seems those beloved auto* tools are just
Our last test release features some bugs in the library
dependencies at least for libXbae. Seems we link against
libMrm and the examples may even link against a different
libXm than the libXbae.
A fix will be in CVS later today.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a standard one instead.
Hmm, you can use any other tool which you have.
So at least for GNU make a make -i run should always succeed
anyway.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is missing from the list of supported platforms in
README from libtool 1.4 and libtool/CVS.
Does anyone know more about? (I'll ask on the libtool list
perhaps)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 09 Jun 2001 21:32:31 +0200 (CED), Alexander Mai wrote:
Are you using LessTif on some less known platform?
This is a good point of time to tell us about ...
For our next release I'd like to update the list of support platforms on
http://lesstif.org/platforms.html
[...]
Forgot
On Sat, 09 Jun 2001 15:41:12 -0400, Uncle George wrote:
does linux/axp fit somewhere in thatlist ?
Well, for linux we currently already have an entry alpha (=architecture)
in addition to i86, 86k and PowerPC.
Someone with an additional platform here?
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps we can cleanup in lib/Xlt a bit:
- NEWS is zero byte. Either we drop it or fill something in. I think auto* runs w/o
this
- COPYING: what there is GPL'ed? We have LPGL and some other, non explicitly
documented licenses IIRC
- ... ?
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wish I could ...
Three possibilities:
- we messed up something in the setup which however seems to work
fine on un*x
- libtool (auto*) is broken on your platform
- you re-ran libtool/auto*?!
What is the output of
sh libtool --version
(in the toplevel dir)?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL
having seens this already but can't
give any details.
Probably it's similar to what I just answered a few seconds ago to
a different problem also on Win NT ...
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The date listed for Xbae is June 30, 2001. That should be May 30, 2001. :-)
Neal
Thanks, should be corrected meanwhile ...
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
release, to be followed shortly by the first
major release of LessTif in 2001.
[...]
Oh, we never had a 'public' announce so far?!
Then we'll see what happens to the download stats today ... ;-)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
short notes about building on the Win platforms we can
easily include them in our Installation instructions or our FAQ.
Ok, people rarely read them, but then one can easily answer by
read http://wherever/FAQ.html#section_1_2_3 ;-)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
handle this at all
(namely that argument to that function). Sounds like a fix which requires
not too many lines of code, but who knows ... ;-)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the lsdoesn't work.
How can I know the name of the file ???
Thank you for your time,
Laure Heigeas
For me as the time of this writing it works perfectly fine.
If not, why don't you try one of our mirror sites?
http://www.lesstif.org/mirrors.html
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=detailaid=433474group_id=8596ati
d=108596
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
their packages on our site.
While it's certainly some work to maintain I guess we wouldn't reject to
distribute them :-) (hmm, not sure the resources on lesstif.org would be
sufficient, but I think we could have them for sure on our SF website)
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but that does by no means indicate that also gcc (+...) is
available.
(2) Adding something on the Lesstif DOWNLOAD page explaining that
Lesstif DLLs are *not* available.
The FAQ/Install docs have an entry about DLLs on Windows.
(the online/CVS version, not yet in 0.92.32)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL
Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Alexander Mai wrote:
(2) Adding something on the Lesstif DOWNLOAD page explaining that
Lesstif DLLs are *not* available.
The FAQ/Install docs have an entry about DLLs on Windows.
(the online/CVS version, not yet in 0.92.32)
One can hardly require
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:11:00AM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Alexander Mai wrote:
I was *not* commenting on what binaries or documentation are on the web
site. My point was *solely* that people coming to the Lesstif home page
*from Cygwin* will expect to find stuff
/../../include/Motif-1.2
as a trialerror input on looking for headers and an equivalent
for the libs. I'm going to drop this.
Here it resulted in something like this:
checking for Motif... libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers
/home/mai/compile/lesstif/lesstif/lib/X
lt/../../include/Motif-1.2
--
Alexander Mai
;-)
As outlined the LessTif developers are responsible (if at all ...)
only for the stuff which is on LessTif web sites. Any third-party docs
or packages are maintained by other people and so one should
report there.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
long commercial, how do I proceed?
(Neglecting any technical/legal/whatever issues) a good place to
make such code pieces available for the public might be on
our SF website
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lesstif
One could upload it as a patch.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:38:43AM +0200, Michel Bardiaux wrote:
Alexander Mai wrote:
[snip]
(Neglecting any technical/legal/whatever issues) a good place to
make such code pieces available for the public might be on
our SF website
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lesstif
One
Xlt seems to be growing, at least even doc files are still missing
and we seem to get new contributions.
Shouldn't we add a doc/ and an include/ directory to
clean up the mess a bit?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for libXm.
Ok, I'll add a doc/. Do we want more substructure like
doc/html, doc/man, ...?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is around. Not a real
good solution.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm quite sure you don't
have the required tools installed, namely a new libtool.
See INSTALL.html (Install) for more details on this issue.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
might have asked,
but forgot. Shouldn't be too complicated, but probably the problem would
be hard to reproduce there (just my idea).
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
stuff and go back. Perhaps when those guys will do their homework
sometime and don't claim the users to be responsible for their
broken stuff we can return.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-alpha, autoconf 2.5 doesn't
work anywhere ;-)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our checks for M*tif within Xbae, Xlt seem to neglect
-lXp?!
Just noticed that I meanwhile couldn't link the related
examples when using our 2.1 libXm ...
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
things work
out better ...)
Once we have done all this we lack again any support for
version checks in between the libraries but we are finally
set to roll out a new major release!
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hasn't seen
too much development in the past ... (and is not even my choice for an WM)
If you're servere shuts down does this relate to a crash of mwm?
If so chanced are that it has created an core cump. Have checked this?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and it's still
there. Can anyone here comment on this?
Now that we don't use libtool 1.4 anymore we can in principle
go back until plain automake 1.4.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
are using mwm/libXm from a debugging enabled build
(configure --enable-debug ...)
- then just run
gdb path/to/executable/mwm core
and type
where
This should give some basic info about the problem.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems have their origin there?!
A bug like this was addressed by Danny yesterday (or day before?).
I guess he can confirm this ...
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a generic flaw within this print widgets?
Danny, have you tried a run with dmalloc or similar?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Going back to automake 1.4-p2 seems to fix the problem
that autoconf is not run when configure.in is touched.
Can really nobody confirm such kind of problems??
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just seem to have problems in building our test tree (anyone else??)
When debugging I noticed that we don't use libtool so far
to build the library in common.
Is there any reason which I miss to create this library as
a shared one? Would save a lot of disk space at least ...
--
Alexander Mai
with a lot of bug reports
in my mailfolder ... :-)
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this time.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone comment on the test tree within our recent tarball
as of 0.92.98?
Earlier distributions didn't ship a complete set of files,
after some bug reports we tried to fix this ...
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of an implementation, it's already in our anonCVS.
It is scheduled RSN!
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
yet, my experience was only Motif 1.2.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
those files?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.13, CVS version no longer does so.
I don't like the idea of having two sets of auto* installed on my
systems just to work on LessTif.
Any ideas??
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Thanks!
Advice might be to install recent set of autotools, including
libtoolwhatever_is_recent, run CVSMake and try again.
For the current major release we saw no possibility to work
around various problems which appear when doing so - perhaps
you have more luck on your system!
---
Alexander Mai
with ViewKlassLessTif?!
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
already give the advice to install
a recent set of auto* tools (libtool 1.4, autoconf 2.5x, automake 1.4-p5),
run CVSMake in our toplevel dir and try this?
Drawback is, of course, that you have then a rather unusable
autoconf installed, but if it helps for LessTif ...
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
far there's no simple solution in sight :-(
The auto* authors are really challenging their users ...
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
patches
(got one patch set from Karsten Jensen) will it make it even
more happy perhaps. Major news is that it now at least doesn't
fail when dependencies are being generated. Earliers versions
were doing so, unless you were using gcc.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
changed
configure.in ...
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
' in our CVSMake if doing 'screenshots'.
BTW, we should do a test release based on new automake!
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem at second glance, but
I guess SendCommand should get a diffeerent signature? Or
is there really a problem?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SRI LANKA
Go to http://www.lesstif.org and look for Downloads.
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 10:13:25AM +0200, Danny Backx wrote:
I've added a XmDropSiteRegistered() which returns False for now,
Alexander has added the prototype for it to the include files.
I've added some code so _XmCalcIconGDimensions() picks up either
the small or large icon pixmap,
at all and keep release-notes.*. (perhaps
promoting them to something like ReleaseNotes.* :-)
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
processing the Makefile.am input, so should still work.
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to work with it.
Anyone who could do this?)
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be a challenge for libtool as well. Has it been
designed for this ?
No idea, didn't try so far.
Perhaps someone should just give some simplified
Makfiles for lib/Xm* a try (locally, not in CVS :-)
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
support Embedded Open Motif on their platforms. (Cygnus model)
The point is to have a GUI builder which has now a flag
selecting the output device and so disable some widgets?!
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
),
but just introducing your macro (to select small or big pixmap)
is probably not sufficient :-(
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
?!
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
automake 1.5, the second
a libtool 1.4 and the third ... hmmm ... no idea.
From what I understood you get only one version unless you explicitly
enable a version != 2.1
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know about the Motif Verification Suite
which can be retrieved from
http://www.opengroup.org/testing/downloads.html
?
Shall we add another 5MB to our test tree? :-)
---
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]: *** [install-mrmHEADERS] Error 1
Bug in automake?
--
Alexander Mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:50:55AM +0200, Alexander Mai wrote:
Unfortrunately I got a couple of times problems like this:
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
/bin/sh /home/mai/compile/lesstif/lesstif/mkinstalldirs /home/mai/include/Mrm
mkdir /home/mai/include/Mrm
mkdir
201 - 300 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
