default as the last parameter unless you specify
%noex. The exception is normally not formatted by the Message.
Ralph
> On Nov 6, 2016, at 4:22 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> My configuration simply has %msg in the pattern layout to output the message.
> However, that seems to be ou
t
chooses.
Ralph
> On Nov 5, 2016, at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> Thanks. I have no problem doing that. Just wondering what needs to be done
> and how? I guess I was hoping that the logging framework, eg. log4j, handled
> combining the message and the exception
es message parameters and the Throwable in a single
vararg array, but please consider that an implementation detail.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Nov 2016, at 10:33, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> Thanks. I have no problem doing that. Just wondering what needs to be done
> and how?
all Layouts and
Appenders follow and should follow.
The Message object passed to the Layout may no longer have the Throwable.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Nov 2016, at 10:01, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info. Unfortunately I'm not following. If someone can point
>
an the one that originally held the Throwable.
The Layout should get the Throwable from the LogEvent, not from the Message.
Remko
Sent from my iPhone
> On 5 Nov 2016, at 7:50,Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> Thanks for the replies. Let me ask a more pointed question now as rummaging
> t
on of the SCM used for
more information about access behind a firewall.
Enjoy!
Remko
Sent from my iPhone
> On 4 Nov 2016, at 23:29, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> I'm not that familiar with java and java conventions, package names, etc.
> I'm trying to find the source for log4
I'm not that familiar with java and java conventions, package names, etc. I'm
trying to find the source for log4j2's implementation of logger.error(String,
Throwable);. Can someone point me to that? I was looking around here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=logging-log4j2.git;a=tre
,
> so let's model the others after it.
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > But I'm not suggesting a code base that will run everywhere. As I said,
> > I'm not talking about a single source code base. What I'm suggesti
gory" property anyway so I think I can use
that.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 10:46 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: approach for defining loggers
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Sorry to revive this
,
Nick
From: Nicholas Duane
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 9:36 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: porting log4j2 to .NET
But I'm not suggesting a code base that will run everywhere. As I said, I'm
not talking about a single source code base.
ctively contribute to the logging
project today. If you are volunteering to kick that off we won’t get in your
way.
Ralph
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> Doesn't sound like you're too lost. Yes, plug-ins certainly is an area where
> the implemen
gain, some languages don’t support multi-threading so
either might require all loggers to be synchronous.
Ralph
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> I guess I don't agree. And just to be clear, I'm not talking about trying to
> have a huge percentage,
eral concept of appenders, loggers, filters, etc., would all probably
> > apply, but the APIs would probably differ a lot. This would affect plugin
> > authors more than users of the library, but the only common things I
> could
> > see happening between different languages might
xotic
thing.
On 18 October 2016 at 09:23, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> I agree. I'm also one for not coding to the lowest common denominator.
> That's one reason we're not using a logging facade as I assume with a
> facade you get only the features that are common across the se
sort of network appender using a standardized binary format.
>
> On 18 October 2016 at 08:53, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > I guess platform is vague. Maybe I should have said language agnostic.
> > It would be nice to have a single logging architecture/design run on
> C/C++,
>
o have similar logging framework for other
runtimes (such as .Net). However, I would not like to constrain Log4j to
only use features available on both JVM and .Net.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> I guess platform is vague. Maybe I should have said language agnostic.
d name and line
number of the caller.
If these are “business” events why do you want to turn them off by the name of
the logger? I would think you might want to filter out certain event types, but
that shouldn’t be represented by the logger name.
Ralph
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 6:47 AM, Nichola
18, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Figured I would send this question out to the log4j side. I have already
> had some email exchanges with the log4net mailing list regarding porting
> log4j2 to .NET. My suggestion was that the apache logging framework be a
> single archi
6 at 21:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > Sorry to revive this old thread. However, we're in the process of adding
> > support for other "categories" of events and thus I wanted to first take
> a
> &g
(what about docs):
6 man-months. You can shorten things up by reducing appenders and
configuration formats.
Gary
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Figured I would send this question out to the log4j side. I have already
> had some email exchanges with the log4net mail
Figured I would send this question out to the log4j side. I have already had
some email exchanges with the log4net mailing list regarding porting log4j2 to
.NET. My suggestion was that the apache logging framework be a single
architecture design which is platform agnostic and then teams which
ted.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Mikael Ståldal
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 3:47 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: approach for defining loggers
Then perhaps you should create your own facade for doing business event
logging, which could then forward them to Log4j
; To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> If you set the status level to ERROR the StatusLogger should generate very
> little output. That said, if you are concerned you can redirect stdout and
> implement the rolling yourself.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Mar 7, 2016, at 8:39 AM
ROR the StatusLogger should generate very
> little output. That said, if you are concerned you can redirect stdout and
> implement the rolling yourself.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Mar 7, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > We've written some appenders an
We've written some appenders and I think the prescribed approach is to use the
status logger in log4j2 components, is that correct? The problem we're running
into is that we redirect stdout to a file and thus that file can grow
unbounded. It seems there's no way to have something like a rollin
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Your appender is automatically wrapped by an AppenderControl object. The
> >>>> AppenderControl will inspect the ignoreExceptions flag so your Appender
> >>>> does not have to. Your Appender should ju
; wrote:
> >
> >> Your appender is automatically wrapped by an AppenderControl object. The
> >> AppenderControl will inspect the ignoreExceptions flag so your Appender
> >> does not have to. Your Appender should just throw a RuntimeException if it
> >> enc
ntrol object. The
> > AppenderControl will inspect the ignoreExceptions flag so your Appender
> > does not have to. Your Appender should just throw a RuntimeException if it
> > encounters a problem.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 2:38 PM, Ni
I'm new to java so maybe this should be an obvious question to most java
developers. If I'm trying to override the append() method but also throw
exceptions, how is that done?
I'm asking because I assume my append method's outermost catch block is to
inspect the ignoreExceptions flag and eithe
to look at some message oriented middleware solution, like JMS or
> the like.
>
> Remko
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 2015/12/15, at 3:27, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > I'll give a brief description on the setup so that hopefully you have a
> >
r in your appender should only be
> logging errors or other events that occur within that Appender, which
> normally would be nothing. Routing events being processed by an Appender
> through a Logger is a bad idea.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2015, at 10:17 A
your
> configuration so that the FATAL-INFO events go to one Appender and the DEBUG
> and TRACE events go to another Appender.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Dec 14, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious if there is such a thing as a StatusAppender i
I'm curious if there is such a thing as a StatusAppender in log4j2 which, as
you would guess, is the appender the StatusLogger would use?
Here's what I'm trying to solve, I think.
I've been telling other developers I work with that a piece of code should only
write to a single logger. The reas
>
> > On Nov 30, 2015, at 12:46 PM, Ralph Goers
> > wrote:
> >
> > From Log4j’s perspective, what is logged is the Message. Each message may
> > have a different way of encapsulating its information.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Nov 30, 2015
2015 08:30:37 -0700
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> Log4j2 logs Message objects. The object being logged is contained within the
> message. You would normally call getFormattedMessage() to get the message
> String if that is what you are after.
>
> Ralph
>
>
rray to be the original
object that was logged?
Thanks,
Nick
> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:08:38 -0700
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> OK - so it sounds like you are fine.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> >
may result in a loop - at which point Log4j will detect it
> and ignore those logging events.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Nov 20, 2015, at 10:55 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > We're attempting to capture error, or info, events that our plugins raise.
> > Fo
e configuration element. The output will then be written to
> that location instead of to stdout.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Nov 20, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > The code happens to be a log4j2 appender, so it sounds like you're saying
> > we sho
implementation doesn’t have Appenders. Instead it has
> StatusListeners that receive the events. The only listeners provided with
> Log4j are the StatusConsoleListener, which writes events to stdout or a
> PrintStream, and StatusLoggerAdmin, which makes events available over JMX.
&g
I'm trying to get information on the StatusLogger. I've searched and so far
the log4j docs say:
"Records events that occur in the logging system."
There are also a bunch of articles related to people having problems with the
StatusLogger. I'm just looking to find out what it is. It appears i
>From reading the log4j2/log4net docs it appears adding a layout to an appender
>is optional. If I don't add a layout to an appender how does the appender
>generate the string for the event? Does it simply call toString()/ToString()
>on the event object? If that's the case then if we want our
g.apache.org
>
> With Async Loggers you can set an ExceptionHandler. Is that what you mean?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 2015/10/30, at 9:07, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > I could have sworn I saw some way to provide a sink for log4j2 (or maybe it
> >
I could have sworn I saw some way to provide a sink for log4j2 (or maybe it was
log4net) internal events. I just did a quick search and couldn't find
anything. Is there such a mechanism? If so, couldn't this be a way for you to
at least capture internal errors which are not bubbled up through
your factory method parameter list Log4j will automatically pass you
> the current Configuration object. From that you can call the getProperties
> method to get the Map of the properties that we provided in the configuration
> file.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> > On Sep 19, 2015,
We're using log4j to log business events. Each application needs to specify
some application key/token. I don't want to add this key/token to our API
which creates the event as that data is static for each application and thus
should not have to appear in the API. I'm looking for some way to
ns.
Thanks,
Nick
> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 01:00:05 +0200
> Subject: Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?
> From: dpsen...@gmail.com
> To: log4net-u...@logging.apache.org; log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> See inline..
>
> 2015-09-18 21:21 GMT+02:00 Nicholas D
ver implements it.
Take a look at http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html.
Ralph
On Sep 18, 2015, at 7:32 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:I looked
over the thread you included below. I can't tell from that whether the
suggestion was to port log4j2. Not sure if the comment about start
; To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org; log4net-u...@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:25:00 +0200
>
> On 2015-09-17, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > "Patches welcome" is my motto :-)
>
> > Gary
EXIT is called when you System.exit(), which might not be loggable
> > depending on I don't know what, HEADLINE is a lame name but I can't think
> > of anything better, VERBOSE is obvious IMO)
> >
> > Which made me wonder if your BUSINESS level could fit in
ng.apache.org
>
> It's not so much that one appender is more code than another. It's all the
> infrastructure underneath it all...
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > Not sure. I was going to ask what a guess on the ef
ubject: Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?
From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
CC: log4net-u...@logging.apache.org
Porting Log4j 2 would be a *huge* job. Would you use a translator of some kind?
Gary
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
e me wonder if your BUSINESS level could fit in like this:
>
> OFF
> FATAL
> ERROR
> WARN
> *BUSINESS*
> INFO
> DEBUG
> TRACE
> ALL
>
> So maybe, just maybe, I could see that a BUSINESS level makes sense instead
> of a marker.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On
ink I read somewhere that log4net was a port of log4j 1.
"Patches welcome" is my motto :-)
Gary
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists.
I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)? Is it because th
Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists.
I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)? Is it because there
is less development work being done on log4net and log4j had significant
changes in the 2.0 version? Any chance log4net might become more of a "port"
of log4j(2) a
I was hoping on getting some replies to my last message as I'm trying to figure
out the best way to utilize the existing logging frameworks, log4j(2) and
log4net in our case, to log our business events and ensure the business events
flow to the correct destination.
I think the two main suggesti
I was about to starting writing a sample to see how markers work and to see if
they could be used for logging business events instead of using a custom level.
While I might have mentioned log4net in passing, we're trying to capture these
business events using existing logging frameworks. Th
I am a bit confused now. Previously someone said that if we used markers the
level used in the log statement would be irrelevant. However, based on this
thread it looks like that's not the case. Can someone give a definitive answer
on what determines whether an event makes it to an appender?
-driven-development-understanding-logging/
>
> I hope it helps!
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Mikael Ståldal
> wrote:
>
> > Then perhaps you should create your own facade for doing business event
> > logging, which could then forward them to L
> > event we wouldn’t need level”? I do not understand how you can code
> > logger.log(BUSINESS, msg) but you cannot code logger.info(BUSINESS, msg).
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Sep 8, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> > >
> > >
>
gger.log(BUSINESS, msg) but you cannot code logger.info(BUSINESS, msg).
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Sep 8, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I looked over that stackoverflow post and I'm still not seeing a good match
> &
questions/16813032/what-is-markers-in-java-logging-frameworks-and-that-is-a-reason-to-use-them
>
> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16813032/what-is-markers-in-java-logging-frameworks-and-that-is-a-reason-to-use-them>.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 7
2015, at 5:54 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> If I'm attempting to control all the logging from the configuration and I
> don't know the complete set of loggers in my application as there could be
> 100's or 1000's, wouldn't it be hard to separate events base
>
> Don't forget that loggers can be controlled by their hierarchical names:
> com.example = DEBUG, usually sets all levels below it to DEBUG, like
> com.example.feature1.sub1, com.example.feature1.sub2, com.example.feature2,
> and so on.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Sep 7,
tegorize logging events by
> arbitrary attributes.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> > On Aug 31, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. I will look into Markers and MDC.
> >
> > With respect to using a separate logger, it would se
logger you're using for
your other events. However, maybe the EventLogger will work.
Thanks,
Nick
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:16:49 -0700
> Subject: Re: approach for defining loggers
> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> On Mon, Aug 31,
ogging.apache.org
>
> Roger that. I'm just wondering how we can better serve visitors to the
> site...
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > While I'm new to log4j I would say I'm not new to logging. We've writt
; I suggest you simply do what achieves your goals. If there are multiple
> options then choose the one that is easiest for your team to maintain.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 2015/09/01, at 7:07, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > All sounds reasonable to me. I&#x
ll of this makes me think we need docs for users new to logging...
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> >> All sounds reasonable to me. I'm not sure any
iting code
> to help you do that, then it might become more obvious, as to what to do.
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > I did look through a bit of documentation on markers:
> >
> > https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.0/manual/
cross a
> set of logging events. Markers are used to categorize logging events by
> arbitrary attributes.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> > On Aug 31, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the feedback. I will look into Markers and MDC.
> >
>
does not fit in the Level vernacular (INFO,
> WARN, and so on).
>
> If you needed a different set of levels, that would be another story (like
> the DEFCON levels example).
>
> Gary
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > Than
ks,
Nick
> Subject: Re: approach for defining loggers
> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:59:36 -0700
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
>
> > On Aug 29, 2015, at 7:44 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious if there is a
> On Aug 29, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> I got log4j 2.3 installed and verified that custom levels are working for me
> now. However, I did noticed you can't set the intValue to a negative number.
> Is that by design?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>
I'm curious if there is a prescribed approach to defining loggers. Let me
state what my assumption is. I assume that normally if some piece of code
wants to log events/messages that it should create a logger for itself. I
guess a reasonable name to use is the class name itself. In terms of l
der than that it is no surprise that it isn’t
> > working.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> > >
> > > While I work on figuring out how to get a newer version of log4j2
> > > installed I'
While I got my LevelRangeFilter working I didn't get an answer to #1 below.
Can someone answer that for me so that I can code appropriately?
Thanks,
Nick
> From: nic...@msn.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: plugins
> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 14:51:58 -0400
>
>
>
>
> I've go
t; package com.mycomp.pluginpackage;
> import ...
>
> And change your config to
>
>
> Using the plugin class name in the packages attribute won't work.
>
> On Friday, August 28, 2015, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > I tried that. I created a jar, I thin
Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 2015/08/28, at 6:42, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't think the implementation is the issue, though if/when I get my
> > plugin loading and it doesn't work I will certainly try to compare again
jar and automatically have the file
> Log4j uses to quickly load the plugin.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 27, 2015, at 12:50 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > Based on your previous comments I assume one would show up out-of-the-box
> > at some point. Of course I ne
garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> Note that I wrote such a filter, which is under review ATM here:
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1106
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1105
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Aug 27,
I've got a couple questions regarding plugins I'm hoping someone might be able
to help me with. I checked the docs and it's still not quite clear.
1. I'm unsure what to set printObject to in my Plugin annotation. From
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/extending.html it says:
"Sp
17:05:02 -0700
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> Custom log levels weren’t added to Log4j 2 until version 2.1, so if the
> version you are using is older than that it is no surprise that it isn’t
> working.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Nic
> > >
> > > What was the output of this program? Were both INFOM1 and INFOP1 not
> > found,
> > > or was INFOM1 found (because it is used in the ThresholdFilter), but not
> > > INFOP1?
> > >
> > > Remko
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug
> From: remko.po...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> Nick,
>
> What was the output of this program? Were both INFOM1 and INFOP1 not found,
> or was INFOM1 found (because it is used in the ThresholdFilter), but not
> INFOP1?
>
> Remko
>
> On Thu, Aug
eleased a version "2.0-1.fc21" so it must be a Fedora build,
> presumably based on 2.0 or some fork of it.
>
> You need to test with version 2.3 or a 2.4-SNAPSHOT. I'll leave you to
> Google how to install 2.3 on Fedora ;-)
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 20
velsWithFiltersTest and feel
> free to provide a patch to test your desired behavior. This might be a tall
> order if you are a true Java newbie ;-)
>
> Gary
>
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
om Git master as well but I do not recall any
> fixes in this area.
>
> I wonder if the Appenders are processed by the configuration _before_ the
> custom levels...
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> >
> >
&g
to stdout that it couldn't find INFOM1 and INFOP1.
>
> Any suggestion on how to get filtering of a single level working with the
> composite filter + threshold filter?
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> > Subject: Re: range filter?
> > From: ralph.go..
On to my next problem. I'm trying to define a custom level in configuration.
Not sure if it's working or not. However, when I attempt to get the level for
that custom level I get back null, which I wasn't expecting. Here is the
log4j2.xml config file:
rt the application domain.
Thanks,
Nick
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:32:15 -0700
> Subject: Re: redefining existing levels?
> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > Maybe wha
the minimum
> logging level is info and that it is not to be changed under any
> circumstances?
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 26, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > Maybe what I'm trying to do is not that useful. However, I'm guessing the
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:24:07 -0700
> Subject: Re: redefining existing levels?
> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > I guess the main use case we're trying to solve is so
ubject: Re: redefining existing levels?
> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> > I guess the main use case we're trying to solve is someone, maybe some
> > admin or maybe a devel
d, or not even presented?.
>
> Or are your users programmers?.
>
>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On 2015/08/26, at 11:35, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It just dawned on me that my solution of redefining OFF to
quot;fatal" to be at the high end,
> but I don't think there is a low and high in Log4J. When you say "below"
> I take it you mean DEBUG and TRACE, but the only thing that makes sense
> to me is to keep INFO, ERROR and FATAL on.
>
> Regards, Bart.
>
>
>
ase.
>
> Regardless, your point about wanting to filter on essentially a single
> integer value makes sense.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 26, 2015, at 6:12 AM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm, I thought for log4j the threshold was less than or equal t
ilter.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 25, 2015, at 9:39 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> >
> > What if someone defined a custom level one less than INFO? Wouldn't that
> > end up in the log also?
> > Thanks,Nick
> >
> > Original mes
2015, at 9:12 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>
> That's exactly the use case I'm looking for. I'll have to study it some
> more. Can you give me an example which filters out everything but INFO?
> Thanks,Nick
>
> Original message
> From: Remko Po
gt; filters. If the result is neutral then the second filter will be used to see
> if the event passes that.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 7:09 PM, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>>
>> Maybe. However, I'm having a hard time following what the confi
O and below levels.
Thanks,Nick
Original message
From: Nicholas Duane
Date: 08/25/2015 7:46 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: redefining existing levels?
Yes and no. The user might know how to turn on/off logging, but they might not
understand what the enterpri
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
