Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen
I cannot help you here as I don't have the file. I assume the reason is 
one of your strange preamble hacks. To find the reason, copy the file 
and remove everything except of one text line. If you then still have 
problems, remove the preamble stuff step by step until you found the 
problematic code.

For the debugging of your preamble I recommend to put it in a external file.

Put the following in preable part of your document settings:
\input{preamble.tex}

Then create and edit preamble.tex with the editor of your choice.

This is also an advantage becaue you'll be able to reuse the preable, 
have different versions etc.




Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Jean Kaplan

Right, I forgot to say that I work on Mac OS 10.4.9,
Jean
Le 30 mai 07 à 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :


Jean == Jean Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Jean I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
Jean have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
Jean remain obscure to me. 2) When I open some documents (created in
Jean version 1.4.4) the preview of mathematical formula only works
Jean for new formulae, for some others it works immediately for the
Jean whole document. Is there a way to force the preview? 3) The
Jean preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger than
Jean in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document. How
Jean can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan

What platform do you use?

JMarc




Re: A shell for launching figure editor under Mac OS

2007-05-31 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 23:34:59 Mael Hilléreau wrote:
 Nobody could send this password to me?

 It may exist as it is mentionned in the Wiki! ;)

It was posted to this list several times, the last one was quite recently. Use 
any search engine on the list, you should get it easily. Christian is the 
responsible for the wiki and the person who posted those messages.

-- 
José Abílio


Re: Algorithm listing

2007-05-31 Thread Helge Hafting

Graham Griffiths wrote:
Is there a way of getting code listings to continue onto another page using 
float algorithm.


If not, does the latest beta version support a multi-page float algorithm.
  

There is no such thing as a multi-page float.

If it isn't a float - then it can continue onto the next page.  If it is
a float, then it can't have a page break.

The whole point of a float is to not break up large objects
(pictures, tables, or anything you _must_ have in one piece)
and still get pretty typesetting by floating the large
objects around a bit. If you don't want it in one piece,
don't use a float. (Or use several floats with pieces of your
big algorithm.)

Breakable code listings can be done in many ways:
1. Use the LyX-code style for writing code.
2. Use a verbatim include, in order to pull in code from a file
3. With the last beta, use insert-Program listing and _don't_ make it 
a float.

4. Use a sequence of floats for your algorithm. The first ones should
   be big enough to fill pages, the last one may be smaller.

Another reason people use floats, is to get a caption they can refer
to. Unfortunately, a caption outside a float is tricky business.
The easiest is to use a heading instead - as you can refer to headings too.

The program listing way is nice, in that you can select whether an
algorithm should be a float or not. And there are lots of other
features. You can get automatic syntax higlighting if you like, you can
get automatic line numbers, you can include pieces from
a file (e.g. lines 10--20) and much more.

Helge Hafting






Re: Force document regeneration

2007-05-31 Thread Helge Hafting

Phil wrote:

  Sometimes Lyx does not detect that I've changed a child document and when I
select View-update-pdf(pdflatex), it does not regenerate the pdf.  The only
work around I've found is make changes that have no effect like adding blank
lines to ERT in the top level document.
  Is there a better way?
  

I usually do this:

Add one letter - save - remove it again - save


LyX don't notice that you get back to exactly the same
document, and will then regenerate all.

Now, LyX isn't supposed to need such trickery, so please
report this at bugzilla.lyx.org.  Well, perhaps you want to
try the developers mailing list first.

Helge Hafting


Including LyX documents as Appendices

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Harris

Hi everyone,

I'm writing a report in which I would like to include several other, 
previously written, LyX documents as appendices to the report. I have 
tried both the Insert-File-LyX Document and the Insert-File-Child 
Document and both have inserted the previous document as a continuation 
of the current document, rather than a sub-section of the appendix (i.e. 
each new section in the previous document creates a new appendix in the 
current document).


I've uploaded a couple PDFs so you can see the effect.
An example previously written document is: 
http://www.pongle.net/~tim/lyx/previous_report.pdf

An example document which includes the previous document is:
http://www.pongle.net/~tim/lyx/main.pdf

I had a good look through the manuals and FAQs, but couldn't see 
anything that would help me.


My ideal result would be that the included document should be printed as 
if it were a separate document, except for the page numbers and perhaps 
a header indicating that it was Appendix A of Report Blah. Another 
option would be for sections to be turned into sub-sections of the 
appendix (A.1, A.2, etc.).


If anyone has any thoughts on how I might go about accomplishing this, 
they would be most helpful.


Many Thanks,
Tim

PS
I'm using LyX 1.4.4 mainly on Windows.


Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Bennett Helm

On May 31, 2007, at 4:48 AM, Jean Kaplan wrote:


Right, I forgot to say that I work on Mac OS 10.4.9,
Jean
Le 30 mai 07 à 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :


Jean == Jean Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Jean I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
Jean have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
Jean remain obscure to me.


I have not encountered frequent crashes. The only one I've noted is a  
crash on log in when LyX is in the Startup items. If you can, please  
provide more details.


By the way, are you on Intel or PPC Mac?


2) When I open some documents (created in
Jean version 1.4.4) the preview of mathematical formula only works
Jean for new formulae, for some others it works immediately for the
Jean whole document. Is there a way to force the preview?


I don't use formulae much myself, so I don't have such documents to  
play with and haven't encountered this problem. Can you isolate some  
minimal examples and post them to the list?



3) The
Jean preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger than
Jean in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document. How
Jean can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan


This is a known problem, though on checking I can't find it in  
bugzilla. I've just put it there (and cc-ed you on it).


Thanks for the report.

Bennett



Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Bennett Helm

On May 31, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Bennett Helm wrote:


3) The
Jean preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger  
than
Jean in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document.  
How

Jean can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan


This is a known problem, though on checking I can't find it in  
bugzilla. I've just put it there (and cc-ed you on it).


Actually, I couldn't. The bug report is:

http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3784

Bennett


Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Maria Gouskova

 Jean I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
 Jean have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
 Jean remain obscure to me.

I have not encountered frequent crashes. The only one I've noted is a
crash on log in when LyX is in the Startup items. If you can, please
provide more details.


I discovered at least one source of the crashes: when material is
selected in a table across several cells using Shift+arrow or
Shift+Cmd+arrow, LyX 1.5.0b3 reliably crashes. On Intel Macs for sure.

Bug already submitted to bugzilla.

Maria


Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread LB
Hi Uwe

 pdflatex is much faster and the resulting PDFs are not larger for me.
 You caption problem must have another reason.

Do you mind tyring to  the same file with ps2pdf to see if TOC and list of
figures look righ?  I want to figure out if the problem is to do with my
system (maybe old version of one of the style files, or something else).

Thanks
Leo



Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Fritz Bein

Hi,

I have some problems with the speed of Lyx 1.5 (beta). Maybe it occurred  
after the installation of MikTex 2.6. A 10-page document takes approx. 35  
sec. to compile and display with Yap. The same document in WinEdt takes  
only 9 sec. on my notebook.


Is this normal, or may there be something wrong in my system?

Regards, Fritz


numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen

Hello,
I am writing a text with the class report (koma-script).

I am having the following problem:

When I add an appendix all
numerations will have a ending point added.

I found the problem with the option pointednumbers in koma script.
(see p. 47: 
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf)


According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections 
with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:

1 first section
2 second section
A. Appendix
B. AppendixB

koma script creates this formating through storing this information in 
the *.aux-file. Latex should be run twice to include this. When I 
preview a postscript (CTRL+T) and and directly actualize it directly 
afterwards (CTRL+SHIFT+T) I cannot see any effect.


What can I do to get the above described formatting?

I had the same problem with having a passage like see another author 
\cite{author_x} in my bibtex file.


Thank you for your help!

Timmie



Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Bo Peng

I have some problems with the speed of Lyx 1.5 (beta). Maybe it occurred
after the installation of MikTex 2.6. A 10-page document takes approx. 35
sec. to compile and display with Yap. The same document in WinEdt takes
only 9 sec. on my notebook.

Is this normal, or may there be something wrong in my system?


Are you sure WinEdit compiles your tex file multiple times to make
indices, citations etc correctly typeset?

You can see from the status bar that how many times lyx runs latex.

Cheers,
Bo


Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven

Tim Michelsen schrieb am 31.05.2007:


Hello,
I am writing a text with the class report (koma-script).



I am having the following problem:



When I add an appendix all
numerations will have a ending point added.



I found the problem with the option pointednumbers in koma script.
(see p. 47: 
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf) 



According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections 
with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:

1 first section
2 second section
A. Appendix
B. AppendixB


This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): Bei der 
Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach 
römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben. i.e. the dot 
has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot 
find this rule in the 2004 Duden (23. Auflage), though.



What can I do to get the above described formatting?


I don't know if it is possible. You can leave the dot or have it, but 
having it with letters and leaving it with numbers is not desired.


I had the same problem with having a passage like see another author 
\cite{author_x} in my bibtex file.


I have no idea what this has to do with your question.

Regards,
Dominik.-

--
DE-TeX-FAQ:  http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq
Minimalbeispiel: http://www.minimalbeispiel.de
BibTeX-Editor:   http://jabref.sourceforge.net



RE: Physical units

2007-05-31 Thread Steed, Robert J
Thanks for all the tips. I'm going to use this last method as it seems the 
simplest, I must of taken my symbols from the wrong locale. 

Regarding the 'normal text mode' in maths mode; it works for most text but not 
for the greek symbols for which latex complains and adds extra math mode $$. 


-Original Message-
From: Uwe Stöhr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 30/05/2007 18:32
To: Steed, Robert J
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Physical units
 
Steed, Robert J schrieb:

 I'm starting to write my thesis in Lyx and it so happens that I need to use 
 microns(?) in my physical units alot. But I can't get a non-italic ? in math 
 mode. Unicode doesn't seem to work either I get error messages:
 
 Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:μ not set up for use with LaTeX.

As you are using LyX 1.5 you can enter it directly via the keyboard. The only 
thing you have to do 
is to use the default encoding for English in your case. Attached is a LyX-file 
showing this.

You can alternatively use the ERT-command
\textmu
when you add this to your document preamble:
\usepackage{textcomp}

Concerning units, don't forget that there is only a hlaf space between number 
and units. A half 
space is produced in LyX with the shortcut Ctrl-Shift Space (menu Insert- 
Formatting - Thin 
space), see also the attached example.

regards Uwe



Re: Question from the wiki

2007-05-31 Thread christian . ridderstrom

On Wed, 30 May 2007, Paul A. Rubin wrote:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 Someone going under 'LyXWinUser' placed the following on a wiki page
 called Site.FAQ. That page is intendend for question regarding the use of
 the wiki, and not issues related to using LyX. So I'm posting the question
 here, hoping that 'LyXWinUser' will get an answer.


An interesting question is whether LyXWinUser knows about this group, 
given that he/she posted the question to the wiki.  I just took a peek 
at Site.FAQ and didn't see the question, so I assume you sanitized the 
page?


That's correct.

Here's a useful trick by the way. Click the button 'History' at the top 
right side of a page. Then you'll see it's history. Or use direct URI:

http://wiki.lyx.org/Site/FAQ?action=diff

Perhaps it would make sense to post temporarily a response directing LWU 
here (and then remove it after some reasonable period, or after LWU 
posts something here)?


How long should we wait?

Also, maybe it would help to add something at the top of Site.FAQ 
directing people here if they have questions not appearing on the FAQ?


I added the following as the third question from the top:

Q:##Q: Should I use this site instead of the LyX users' mailing list?
A: No. The LyX users' list and this site complement each other. A good way 
to work to ask questions on the users' list, and then later on document 
the answers on this site. See [[LyX.Internet Resources]] for more details 
about the users' list.



Do you think something more is needed? (Feel free to add something at the 
top - I couldn't come up with a good text)


/Christian

--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Fritz Bein

Am 31.05.2007, 15:59 Uhr, schrieb Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


I have some problems with the speed of Lyx 1.5 (beta). Maybe it occurred
after the installation of MikTex 2.6. A 10-page document takes approx.  
35

sec. to compile and display with Yap. The same document in WinEdt takes
only 9 sec. on my notebook.

Is this normal, or may there be something wrong in my system?


Are you sure WinEdit compiles your tex file multiple times to make
indices, citations etc correctly typeset?

You can see from the status bar that how many times lyx runs latex.

Cheers,
Bo


You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if  
there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility of  
short compile in lyx, too?


Regards, Fritz


Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Bo Peng

You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if
there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility of
short compile in lyx, too?


I guess not, because lyx does not know if your 'minor changes' involve
index or citation changes so it plays safe by running the correct
number of runs.

Bo


Re: Question from the wiki

2007-05-31 Thread christian . ridderstrom

On Thu, 31 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Perhaps it would make sense to post temporarily a response directing
 LWU here (and then remove it after some reasonable period, or after
 LWU posts something here)?


How long should we wait?


 Also, maybe it would help to add something at the top of Site.FAQ
 directing people here if they have questions not appearing on the FAQ?


I added the following as the third question from the top:

Q:##Q: Should I use this site instead of the LyX users' mailing list? A: 
No. The LyX users' list and this site complement each other. A good way 
to work to ask questions on the users' list, and then later on document 
the answers on this site. See [[LyX.Internet Resources]] for more 
details about the users' list.



I've also added a note to the Welcome page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/
that says the following:

Note: This site is a complement to the mailing lists . not a
replacement. If you have a user question and can't find the answer
here, go to the users' list and ask the question! If you then want
to help, you can document the answer you got from the users' list
here. For more information about the users' list and the
developers' list, see the page internet resources under the
section Lists and news groups.

Don't think I've come across the problem of people not knowing of the 
users' list before.


Should this be made even more clear?

/Christian

--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Steve Litt
On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:22, Fritz Bein wrote:

 You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if
 there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility of
 short compile in lyx, too?

 Regards, Fritz

I don't know much about Windows, but in Linux I just make a shellscript (like 
a batch file) called jj, and use that to compile. If I were willing not to 
reindex and the like, I could make another one called jjj that just does a 
short compile.

Either way, what I do for speed is compile only to .dvi, and then view the 
dvi. For instance:

lyx --export latex myfile.lyx
latex myfile.tex
xdvi myfile.dvi

Much shorter than if I compiled all the way to ps or pdf (unless I were using 
pdflatex, of course).

By scripting it, YOU tell it exactly what to include and what to leave out.

HTH

SteveT

Steve Litt
Author: Universal Troubleshooting Process books and courseware
http://www.troubleshooters.com/


Re: Force document regeneration

2007-05-31 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Phil wrote:
 Sometimes Lyx does not detect that I've changed a child document and when I
 select View-update-pdf(pdflatex), it does not regenerate the pdf.  The
 only work around I've found is make changes that have no effect like adding
 blank lines to ERT in the top level document.
   Is there a better way?

Lots of this will be fixed in 1.5.0.

Jürgen


Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen
This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): Bei der 



Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach 
römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben. i.e. the dot 
has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot 
find this rule in the 2004 Duden (23. Auflage), though.
I have 2006 Duden (24. Auflage) and can't find it either. I don't know 
why the'd bulid this option in that package. Very strange.


I found some discussion at:
Help with the (non-existent) points in the numbering of parts and appendices
http://www.komascript.de/node/604

When I will this text finshed I gonna contact the author of koma script 
for clarification.
Strange that no one else wondered about this. Especially the issue 
reported for figures and tables is wired:

http://www.komascript.de/node/604#comment-1416


What can I do to get the above described formatting?


I don't know if it is possible. You can leave the dot or have it, but 
having it with letters and leaving it with numbers is not desired.

Yes, I'll use pointlessnumbers.

Thanks for answering, through!



Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Fritz Bein

Am 31.05.2007, 17:45 Uhr, schrieb Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:22, Fritz Bein wrote:


You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if
there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility  
of

short compile in lyx, too?

Regards, Fritz


I don't know much about Windows, but in Linux I just make a shellscript  
(like
a batch file) called jj, and use that to compile. If I were willing not  
to
reindex and the like, I could make another one called jjj that just does  
a

short compile.

Either way, what I do for speed is compile only to .dvi, and then view  
the

dvi. For instance:

lyx --export latex myfile.lyx
latex myfile.tex
xdvi myfile.dvi

Much shorter than if I compiled all the way to ps or pdf (unless I were  
using

pdflatex, of course).

By scripting it, YOU tell it exactly what to include and what to leave  
out.


HTH

SteveT

Steve Litt
Author: Universal Troubleshooting Process books and courseware
http://www.troubleshooters.com/


Thanks for your help.

Such a script works fine for me (Using the command-shell of windows).

Apart from that I have cleaned up my directory pathes. Multiple versions  
of python and ghostscript did seem to make the system faster :-)


Regards, Fritz





Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven

Tim Michelsen schrieb am 31.05.2007:

When I will this text finshed I gonna contact the author of koma script 
for clarification.
Strange that no one else wondered about this. Especially the issue 
reported for figures and tables is wired:

http://www.komascript.de/node/604#comment-1416


I don't know if you understood it already (or maybe I did not get your 
point). There are two possibilities according to Duden 1996:


Possibility 1 (no appendix):
1 Chapter
1.1 Section
1.2 Section
2 Chapter
2.1 Section
..
Figure 2.1
..

Possibility 2 (with appendix):
1. Chapter
1.1. Section
1.2. Section
2. Chapter
2.1. Section
..
Figure 2.1.
..
A. Appendix 1
A.1. Section
A.2. Section
B. Appendix 2
B.1. Section
..
Figure B.1.
..

In *both* cases, referring to a sectino results e.g. in Section 1.2 
(i.e. without the dot after the last number!).


The KOMA option pointlessnumbers gives you the result of possibility 
1, even if there is an appendix.


The KOMA option pointednumbers gives you the result of possibility 2, 
even if there is no appendix.


If you have none of the options set, KOMA decides which case is 
appropriate, i.e.: if you have no appendix, possibility 1 is used, if 
you have an appendix, possibility 2 is used. This feature may need more 
LaTeX runs of which LyX is not aware, so it could be that the change 
does not take effect in the first output after you added or removed an 
appendix. But if you change something in the lyx document and compile 
again, the change should become effective.


Regards,
Dominik.-




Longtable Rotate

2007-05-31 Thread James
I am using 1.5 beta 3 on a Mac.

When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
degrees² then I get an error message when compiling.  Either of the options
work independently, but not together...

I haven¹t tested this with earlier versions of Lyx.

Any suggestsions?

James


Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen
I don't know if you understood it already (or maybe I did not get your 
point).

I understood you answer.


There are two possibilities according to Duden 1996:
I check my Duden once again and couldn't find it. No way. The new Duden 
even has no R.x rules. they are named K.x

I you have a page numer or something that would be great.

In *both* cases, referring to a sectino results e.g. in Section 1.2 
(i.e. without the dot after the last number!).


The KOMA option pointlessnumbers gives you the result of possibility 
1, even if there is an appendix.


The KOMA option pointednumbers gives you the result of possibility 2, 
even if there is no appendix.

Thanks for your clarification.

Since I have a appendix LaTeX came up with the automatic solution 
described in the documentation.


What troubles me most is that it also puts these dots after the words 
Figure and Table in all captions which not desired at all.

This was written also at:
http://www.komascript.de/node/604#comment-1416

appendix. But if you change something in the lyx document and compile 
again, the change should become effective.

I try. If not I'd rather switch off than having also doted captions.

Greetings,
Tim



Bug: bibliography-case problem in Lyx 1.5 Beta2

2007-05-31 Thread Valter Filipe Silva

Hello,


I'm using lyx 1.5 beta2 under windows XP.
There are a problem in the bibliography management system.
I choose insert citation and, the list of the reference appear in lower 
case.
I choose a bibtex entry named nolte:01 (in .bib file it is Nolte:01) 
and, in Lyx it appears [nolte:01] instead of [Nolte:01].
When i compile the document it appear [?]. If i try to change the case 
in the bib file for nolte:01 or to insert tex code (\cite{Nolte:01}) it 
works fine.


Is this bug corrected in version Beta3 ?
Best Regards


VFS



--
-
Valter Filipe Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Departamento de Electrónica e Telecomunicações
Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Águeda
Universidade de Aveiro
3810-193 Aveiro




Bug: bibliography-case problem in Lyx 1.5 Beta2

2007-05-31 Thread Valter Filipe Silva

Hello,


I'm using lyx 1.5 beta2 under windows XP.
There are a problem in the bibliography management system.
I choose insert citation and, the list of the reference appear in lower 
case.
I choose a bibtex entry named nolte:01 (in .bib file it is Nolte:01) 
and, in Lyx it appears [nolte:01] instead of [Nolte:01].
When i compile the document it appear [?]. If i try to change the case 
in the bib file for nolte:01 or to insert tex code (\cite{Nolte:01}) it 
works fine.


Is this bug corrected in version Beta3 ?
Best Regards


VFS



--
-
Valter Filipe Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Departamento de Electrónica e Telecomunicações
Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Águeda
Universidade de Aveiro
3810-193 Aveiro






Re: Bug: bibliography-case problem in Lyx 1.5 Beta2

2007-05-31 Thread Richard Heck

Valter Filipe Silva wrote:

I'm using lyx 1.5 beta2 under windows XP.
There are a problem in the bibliography management system.
I choose insert citation and, the list of the reference appear in 
lower case.
I choose a bibtex entry named nolte:01 (in .bib file it is Nolte:01) 
and, in Lyx it appears [nolte:01] instead of [Nolte:01].
When i compile the document it appear [?]. If i try to change the case 
in the bib file for nolte:01 or to insert tex code (\cite{Nolte:01}) 
it works fine.


Is this bug corrected in version Beta3 ?

Yes.

Richard







--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto



Re: Longtable Rotate

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen



When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
degrees² then I get an error message when compiling.  Either of the options
work independently, but not together...

I use
ERT: \begin{landscape}
TABLE
ERT
\end{landscape}

Which works well.



Re: Algorithm listing

2007-05-31 Thread Graham Griffiths
Hi Helge, 

Thanks for the information and clrification regarding floats. 

I will be updating to the new version of LyX soon and will try out the insert 
program listing feature.

Regards,

graham





Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
 Tim Michelsen schrieb am 31.05.2007:
 
 Hello,
 I am writing a text with the class report (koma-script).
 
 I am having the following problem:
 
 When I add an appendix all
 numerations will have a ending point added.
 
 I found the problem with the option pointednumbers in koma script.
 (see p. 47: 
 ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf)
  
 
 
 According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections 
 with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:
 1 first section
 2 second section
 A. Appendix
 B. AppendixB
 
 This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): Bei der 
 Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach 
 römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben. i.e. the dot 
 has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot 
 find this rule in the 2004 Duden (23. Auflage), though.

It certainly look wrong.

1. first section
2. second section
A Appendix
B AppendixB

looks ok-ish, biutn certainlyh not the other way round.

I'd prefer the completely dotless version in any case.

Andre'


Re: Question from the wiki

2007-05-31 Thread Paul A. Rubin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a useful trick by the way. Click the button 'History' at the top 
right side of a page. Then you'll see it's history. Or use direct URI:

http://wiki.lyx.org/Site/FAQ?action=diff


Slick ... but not obvious, especially to a wiki rookie.


Perhaps it would make sense to post temporarily a response directing 
LWU here (and then remove it after some reasonable period, or after 
LWU posts something here)?


How long should we wait?


A couple of weeks should be sufficient, I would think -- or until he 
shows up on the user list, whichever comes first.


Also, maybe it would help to add something at the top of Site.FAQ 
directing people here if they have questions not appearing on the FAQ?


I added the following as the third question from the top:

Q:##Q: Should I use this site instead of the LyX users' mailing list?
A: No. The LyX users' list and this site complement each other. A good 
way to work to ask questions on the users' list, and then later on 
document the answers on this site. See [[LyX.Internet Resources]] for 
more details about the users' list.



Do you think something more is needed? (Feel free to add something at 
the top - I couldn't come up with a good text)


Looks ok to me, charitably assuming that someone reads that far before 
posting a question.  Since this is the first time it's occurred, I think 
what you wrote is fine.  If the wiki gets deluged with misplaced 
questions, we can consider something more obvious.


Incidentally, the capitalization of the table of contents of the 
Site.FAQ page is a bit funky.  I thought to edit it, but for the life of 
me I can't figure out where the command that inserts the TOC is getting 
the entries.  (Not just capitalization, either:  headings 2 and 4 seem 
to have dropped an initial word or two.)


/Paul



/Christian





Re: Longtable Rotate

2007-05-31 Thread James
Thanks - this works nicely!


On 5/31/07 10:43 AM, Tim Michelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
 degrees² then I get an error message when compiling.  Either of the options
 work independently, but not together...
 I use
 ERT: \begin{landscape}
 TABLE
 ERT
 \end{landscape}
 
 Which works well.


Different fonts in Figure title, List of Figures

2007-05-31 Thread Rockoff, David


I am writing a report in LyX, and would like to have my figure/float titles in 
bold in the body of the report, but non-bold in the List of Figures.
What is the easiest way to accomplish this?  

I have had some success with the Insert Short Title command (putting the short 
title in non-bold, and the regular title in bold).  But this does not allow me 
to have the words Figure # in bold in the report body.

Any thoughts?

TIA,
-Dave 




Article class with theorems (layout file)

2007-05-31 Thread A S

Dear All,

I am using the document class article (AMS, sequential numbering).
This gives me a drop-down menu from which I can select environments
Theorem, Corollary, Lemma, Proof, etc. However, I do not want to use
the amsart document class but the normal class article and still have
access to the expanded drop-down menu with Theorem, Corollary, Lemma,
and so on.

Has anyone written layout files that combine the normal article class
with the expanded drop-down menu?

Thanks in advance,

Alex


Re: Article class with theorems (layout file)

2007-05-31 Thread Richard Heck

A S wrote:

Has anyone written layout files that combine the normal article class
with the expanded drop-down menu?
This is not too hard. You can start with the amsmaths.inc file. Bits 
will need to be changed---remove the \theroemstyle declarations, and 
delete all the starred ones---but it should be pretty easy. 
Alternatively, it ought to be possible to include this file if you add 
\usepackage{amsmath}. So try this:

#% Do not delete the line below; configure depends on this
#  \DeclareLaTeXClass[article.cls]{article (theorems)}

Preamble
 \usepackage{amsmaths}
EndPreamble
Input article.layout
Input amsmaths.inc


--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto



Re: A shell for launching figure editor under Mac OS

2007-05-31 Thread Mael Hilléreau

Le 31 mai 07 à 11:48, José Matos a écrit :


On Wednesday 30 May 2007 23:34:59 Mael Hilléreau wrote:

Nobody could send this password to me?

It may exist as it is mentionned in the Wiki! ;)


It was posted to this list several times, the last one was quite  
recently. Use
any search engine on the list, you should get it easily. Christian  
is the

responsible for the wiki and the person who posted those messages.


Thank you. I could upload the file.

--
Mael Hilléreau
http://mael.hillereau.free.fr





Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread Uwe Stöhr

LB schrieb:


Do you mind tyring to  the same file with ps2pdf to see if TOC and list of
figures look righ?  I want to figure out if the problem is to do with my
system (maybe old version of one of the style files, or something else).


The file I sent you can also compiled using ps2pdf without problems: The caption text is correctly 
broken at the line end, the bibliography is linked, bookmarks are generated.


regards Uwe


Re: Different fonts in Figure title, List of Figures

2007-05-31 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Rockoff, David schrieb:


I am writing a report in LyX, and would like to have my figure/float titles in 
bold in the body of the report, but non-bold in the List of Figures.
What is the easiest way to accomplish this?


Use the LaTeX-package caption. An explanation about this is given in the EmbeddedObjects manual 
which is included to LyX 1.4.4 or available here:


http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment#EmbeddedObjects

regards Uwe


Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread LB

Hi

This means that my setup is wrong. Because this file and EmbeddedObjects.lyx 
file do not compile properly with ps2pdf with the same problem of  long 
section names and figure captions running of the page and not wrapping 
around.


That's really the only problem I have with hyperref.

Is there a way of debuging this?

Thanks
Leo



LB schrieb:

Do you mind tyring to  the same file with ps2pdf to see if TOC and list 
of

figures look righ?  I want to figure out if the problem is to do with my
system (maybe old version of one of the style files, or something else).


The file I sent you can also compiled using ps2pdf without problems: The 
caption text is correctly broken at the line end, the bibliography is 
linked, bookmarks are generated.


regards Uwe








Lyx-1.5 beta3 and letter class

2007-05-31 Thread Deane Harder

Dear all,

I use lyx 1.5 beta3 on Mac. When I opened a New file from template and 
chose letter (g-brief-de) and tried to PDF it, I got the following error 
message: LaTeX Error: Command \Telefon already defined. The same happens 
when I open existing lyx letter documents that I wrote with lyx 1.4. Any 
ideas?


Thanks

Deane Harder


Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread Uwe Stöhr

LB schrieb:


This means that my setup is wrong. ...
Is there a way of debuging this?


Not really. I recommend that you update your hyperref version. Concerning your LaTeX-system, when 
you are using MiKTeX, use its uppdate manager, when you are using TeXLive, update it to TeXLive 
2007, when you are still using teTeX, update it to TeXLive.


regards Uwe


Re: Force document regeneration

2007-05-31 Thread Phil
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Sometimes Lyx does not detect that I've changed a child document and when I
  select View-update-pdf(pdflatex), it does not regenerate the pdf.  The
  only work around I've found is make changes that have no effect like adding
  blank lines to ERT in the top level document.
Is there a better way?
 
 Lots of this will be fixed in 1.5.0.
 

I think it would still be useful to have some kind of force regeneration
mechanism.  Lyx cannot know about all possible changes that require a rerun of
Latex.  For example, today I had a problem where pdftex could not find a new
font I installed because I had forgotten to run updmap. After running updmap, I
had to trick Lyx into rerunning latex.

Phil






Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen
I cannot help you here as I don't have the file. I assume the reason is 
one of your strange preamble hacks. To find the reason, copy the file 
and remove everything except of one text line. If you then still have 
problems, remove the preamble stuff step by step until you found the 
problematic code.

For the debugging of your preamble I recommend to put it in a external file.

Put the following in preable part of your document settings:
\input{preamble.tex}

Then create and edit preamble.tex with the editor of your choice.

This is also an advantage becaue you'll be able to reuse the preable, 
have different versions etc.




Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Jean Kaplan

Right, I forgot to say that I work on Mac OS 10.4.9,
Jean
Le 30 mai 07 à 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :


Jean == Jean Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Jean I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
Jean have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
Jean remain obscure to me. 2) When I open some documents (created in
Jean version 1.4.4) the preview of mathematical formula only works
Jean for new formulae, for some others it works immediately for the
Jean whole document. Is there a way to force the preview? 3) The
Jean preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger than
Jean in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document. How
Jean can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan

What platform do you use?

JMarc




Re: A shell for launching figure editor under Mac OS

2007-05-31 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 23:34:59 Mael Hilléreau wrote:
 Nobody could send this password to me?

 It may exist as it is mentionned in the Wiki! ;)

It was posted to this list several times, the last one was quite recently. Use 
any search engine on the list, you should get it easily. Christian is the 
responsible for the wiki and the person who posted those messages.

-- 
José Abílio


Re: Algorithm listing

2007-05-31 Thread Helge Hafting

Graham Griffiths wrote:
Is there a way of getting code listings to continue onto another page using 
float algorithm.


If not, does the latest beta version support a multi-page float algorithm.
  

There is no such thing as a multi-page float.

If it isn't a float - then it can continue onto the next page.  If it is
a float, then it can't have a page break.

The whole point of a float is to not break up large objects
(pictures, tables, or anything you _must_ have in one piece)
and still get pretty typesetting by floating the large
objects around a bit. If you don't want it in one piece,
don't use a float. (Or use several floats with pieces of your
big algorithm.)

Breakable code listings can be done in many ways:
1. Use the LyX-code style for writing code.
2. Use a verbatim include, in order to pull in code from a file
3. With the last beta, use insert-Program listing and _don't_ make it 
a float.

4. Use a sequence of floats for your algorithm. The first ones should
   be big enough to fill pages, the last one may be smaller.

Another reason people use floats, is to get a caption they can refer
to. Unfortunately, a caption outside a float is tricky business.
The easiest is to use a heading instead - as you can refer to headings too.

The program listing way is nice, in that you can select whether an
algorithm should be a float or not. And there are lots of other
features. You can get automatic syntax higlighting if you like, you can
get automatic line numbers, you can include pieces from
a file (e.g. lines 10--20) and much more.

Helge Hafting






Re: Force document regeneration

2007-05-31 Thread Helge Hafting

Phil wrote:

  Sometimes Lyx does not detect that I've changed a child document and when I
select View-update-pdf(pdflatex), it does not regenerate the pdf.  The only
work around I've found is make changes that have no effect like adding blank
lines to ERT in the top level document.
  Is there a better way?
  

I usually do this:

Add one letter - save - remove it again - save


LyX don't notice that you get back to exactly the same
document, and will then regenerate all.

Now, LyX isn't supposed to need such trickery, so please
report this at bugzilla.lyx.org.  Well, perhaps you want to
try the developers mailing list first.

Helge Hafting


Including LyX documents as Appendices

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Harris

Hi everyone,

I'm writing a report in which I would like to include several other, 
previously written, LyX documents as appendices to the report. I have 
tried both the Insert-File-LyX Document and the Insert-File-Child 
Document and both have inserted the previous document as a continuation 
of the current document, rather than a sub-section of the appendix (i.e. 
each new section in the previous document creates a new appendix in the 
current document).


I've uploaded a couple PDFs so you can see the effect.
An example previously written document is: 
http://www.pongle.net/~tim/lyx/previous_report.pdf

An example document which includes the previous document is:
http://www.pongle.net/~tim/lyx/main.pdf

I had a good look through the manuals and FAQs, but couldn't see 
anything that would help me.


My ideal result would be that the included document should be printed as 
if it were a separate document, except for the page numbers and perhaps 
a header indicating that it was Appendix A of Report Blah. Another 
option would be for sections to be turned into sub-sections of the 
appendix (A.1, A.2, etc.).


If anyone has any thoughts on how I might go about accomplishing this, 
they would be most helpful.


Many Thanks,
Tim

PS
I'm using LyX 1.4.4 mainly on Windows.


Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Bennett Helm

On May 31, 2007, at 4:48 AM, Jean Kaplan wrote:


Right, I forgot to say that I work on Mac OS 10.4.9,
Jean
Le 30 mai 07 à 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :


Jean == Jean Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Jean I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
Jean have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
Jean remain obscure to me.


I have not encountered frequent crashes. The only one I've noted is a  
crash on log in when LyX is in the Startup items. If you can, please  
provide more details.


By the way, are you on Intel or PPC Mac?


2) When I open some documents (created in
Jean version 1.4.4) the preview of mathematical formula only works
Jean for new formulae, for some others it works immediately for the
Jean whole document. Is there a way to force the preview?


I don't use formulae much myself, so I don't have such documents to  
play with and haven't encountered this problem. Can you isolate some  
minimal examples and post them to the list?



3) The
Jean preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger than
Jean in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document. How
Jean can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan


This is a known problem, though on checking I can't find it in  
bugzilla. I've just put it there (and cc-ed you on it).


Thanks for the report.

Bennett



Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Bennett Helm

On May 31, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Bennett Helm wrote:


3) The
Jean preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger  
than
Jean in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document.  
How

Jean can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan


This is a known problem, though on checking I can't find it in  
bugzilla. I've just put it there (and cc-ed you on it).


Actually, I couldn't. The bug report is:

http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3784

Bennett


Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Maria Gouskova

 Jean I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
 Jean have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
 Jean remain obscure to me.

I have not encountered frequent crashes. The only one I've noted is a
crash on log in when LyX is in the Startup items. If you can, please
provide more details.


I discovered at least one source of the crashes: when material is
selected in a table across several cells using Shift+arrow or
Shift+Cmd+arrow, LyX 1.5.0b3 reliably crashes. On Intel Macs for sure.

Bug already submitted to bugzilla.

Maria


Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread LB
Hi Uwe

 pdflatex is much faster and the resulting PDFs are not larger for me.
 You caption problem must have another reason.

Do you mind tyring to  the same file with ps2pdf to see if TOC and list of
figures look righ?  I want to figure out if the problem is to do with my
system (maybe old version of one of the style files, or something else).

Thanks
Leo



Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Fritz Bein

Hi,

I have some problems with the speed of Lyx 1.5 (beta). Maybe it occurred  
after the installation of MikTex 2.6. A 10-page document takes approx. 35  
sec. to compile and display with Yap. The same document in WinEdt takes  
only 9 sec. on my notebook.


Is this normal, or may there be something wrong in my system?

Regards, Fritz


numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen

Hello,
I am writing a text with the class report (koma-script).

I am having the following problem:

When I add an appendix all
numerations will have a ending point added.

I found the problem with the option pointednumbers in koma script.
(see p. 47: 
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf)


According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections 
with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:

1 first section
2 second section
A. Appendix
B. AppendixB

koma script creates this formating through storing this information in 
the *.aux-file. Latex should be run twice to include this. When I 
preview a postscript (CTRL+T) and and directly actualize it directly 
afterwards (CTRL+SHIFT+T) I cannot see any effect.


What can I do to get the above described formatting?

I had the same problem with having a passage like see another author 
\cite{author_x} in my bibtex file.


Thank you for your help!

Timmie



Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Bo Peng

I have some problems with the speed of Lyx 1.5 (beta). Maybe it occurred
after the installation of MikTex 2.6. A 10-page document takes approx. 35
sec. to compile and display with Yap. The same document in WinEdt takes
only 9 sec. on my notebook.

Is this normal, or may there be something wrong in my system?


Are you sure WinEdit compiles your tex file multiple times to make
indices, citations etc correctly typeset?

You can see from the status bar that how many times lyx runs latex.

Cheers,
Bo


Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven

Tim Michelsen schrieb am 31.05.2007:


Hello,
I am writing a text with the class report (koma-script).



I am having the following problem:



When I add an appendix all
numerations will have a ending point added.



I found the problem with the option pointednumbers in koma script.
(see p. 47: 
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf) 



According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections 
with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:

1 first section
2 second section
A. Appendix
B. AppendixB


This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): Bei der 
Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach 
römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben. i.e. the dot 
has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot 
find this rule in the 2004 Duden (23. Auflage), though.



What can I do to get the above described formatting?


I don't know if it is possible. You can leave the dot or have it, but 
having it with letters and leaving it with numbers is not desired.


I had the same problem with having a passage like see another author 
\cite{author_x} in my bibtex file.


I have no idea what this has to do with your question.

Regards,
Dominik.-

--
DE-TeX-FAQ:  http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq
Minimalbeispiel: http://www.minimalbeispiel.de
BibTeX-Editor:   http://jabref.sourceforge.net



RE: Physical units

2007-05-31 Thread Steed, Robert J
Thanks for all the tips. I'm going to use this last method as it seems the 
simplest, I must of taken my symbols from the wrong locale. 

Regarding the 'normal text mode' in maths mode; it works for most text but not 
for the greek symbols for which latex complains and adds extra math mode $$. 


-Original Message-
From: Uwe Stöhr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 30/05/2007 18:32
To: Steed, Robert J
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Physical units
 
Steed, Robert J schrieb:

 I'm starting to write my thesis in Lyx and it so happens that I need to use 
 microns(?) in my physical units alot. But I can't get a non-italic ? in math 
 mode. Unicode doesn't seem to work either I get error messages:
 
 Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:μ not set up for use with LaTeX.

As you are using LyX 1.5 you can enter it directly via the keyboard. The only 
thing you have to do 
is to use the default encoding for English in your case. Attached is a LyX-file 
showing this.

You can alternatively use the ERT-command
\textmu
when you add this to your document preamble:
\usepackage{textcomp}

Concerning units, don't forget that there is only a hlaf space between number 
and units. A half 
space is produced in LyX with the shortcut Ctrl-Shift Space (menu Insert- 
Formatting - Thin 
space), see also the attached example.

regards Uwe



Re: Question from the wiki

2007-05-31 Thread christian . ridderstrom

On Wed, 30 May 2007, Paul A. Rubin wrote:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 Someone going under 'LyXWinUser' placed the following on a wiki page
 called Site.FAQ. That page is intendend for question regarding the use of
 the wiki, and not issues related to using LyX. So I'm posting the question
 here, hoping that 'LyXWinUser' will get an answer.


An interesting question is whether LyXWinUser knows about this group, 
given that he/she posted the question to the wiki.  I just took a peek 
at Site.FAQ and didn't see the question, so I assume you sanitized the 
page?


That's correct.

Here's a useful trick by the way. Click the button 'History' at the top 
right side of a page. Then you'll see it's history. Or use direct URI:

http://wiki.lyx.org/Site/FAQ?action=diff

Perhaps it would make sense to post temporarily a response directing LWU 
here (and then remove it after some reasonable period, or after LWU 
posts something here)?


How long should we wait?

Also, maybe it would help to add something at the top of Site.FAQ 
directing people here if they have questions not appearing on the FAQ?


I added the following as the third question from the top:

Q:##Q: Should I use this site instead of the LyX users' mailing list?
A: No. The LyX users' list and this site complement each other. A good way 
to work to ask questions on the users' list, and then later on document 
the answers on this site. See [[LyX.Internet Resources]] for more details 
about the users' list.



Do you think something more is needed? (Feel free to add something at the 
top - I couldn't come up with a good text)


/Christian

--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Fritz Bein

Am 31.05.2007, 15:59 Uhr, schrieb Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


I have some problems with the speed of Lyx 1.5 (beta). Maybe it occurred
after the installation of MikTex 2.6. A 10-page document takes approx.  
35

sec. to compile and display with Yap. The same document in WinEdt takes
only 9 sec. on my notebook.

Is this normal, or may there be something wrong in my system?


Are you sure WinEdit compiles your tex file multiple times to make
indices, citations etc correctly typeset?

You can see from the status bar that how many times lyx runs latex.

Cheers,
Bo


You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if  
there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility of  
short compile in lyx, too?


Regards, Fritz


Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Bo Peng

You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if
there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility of
short compile in lyx, too?


I guess not, because lyx does not know if your 'minor changes' involve
index or citation changes so it plays safe by running the correct
number of runs.

Bo


Re: Question from the wiki

2007-05-31 Thread christian . ridderstrom

On Thu, 31 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Perhaps it would make sense to post temporarily a response directing
 LWU here (and then remove it after some reasonable period, or after
 LWU posts something here)?


How long should we wait?


 Also, maybe it would help to add something at the top of Site.FAQ
 directing people here if they have questions not appearing on the FAQ?


I added the following as the third question from the top:

Q:##Q: Should I use this site instead of the LyX users' mailing list? A: 
No. The LyX users' list and this site complement each other. A good way 
to work to ask questions on the users' list, and then later on document 
the answers on this site. See [[LyX.Internet Resources]] for more 
details about the users' list.



I've also added a note to the Welcome page.
http://wiki.lyx.org/
that says the following:

Note: This site is a complement to the mailing lists . not a
replacement. If you have a user question and can't find the answer
here, go to the users' list and ask the question! If you then want
to help, you can document the answer you got from the users' list
here. For more information about the users' list and the
developers' list, see the page internet resources under the
section Lists and news groups.

Don't think I've come across the problem of people not knowing of the 
users' list before.


Should this be made even more clear?

/Christian

--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44   http://www.md.kth.se/~chr

Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Steve Litt
On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:22, Fritz Bein wrote:

 You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if
 there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility of
 short compile in lyx, too?

 Regards, Fritz

I don't know much about Windows, but in Linux I just make a shellscript (like 
a batch file) called jj, and use that to compile. If I were willing not to 
reindex and the like, I could make another one called jjj that just does a 
short compile.

Either way, what I do for speed is compile only to .dvi, and then view the 
dvi. For instance:

lyx --export latex myfile.lyx
latex myfile.tex
xdvi myfile.dvi

Much shorter than if I compiled all the way to ps or pdf (unless I were using 
pdflatex, of course).

By scripting it, YOU tell it exactly what to include and what to leave out.

HTH

SteveT

Steve Litt
Author: Universal Troubleshooting Process books and courseware
http://www.troubleshooters.com/


Re: Force document regeneration

2007-05-31 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Phil wrote:
 Sometimes Lyx does not detect that I've changed a child document and when I
 select View-update-pdf(pdflatex), it does not regenerate the pdf.  The
 only work around I've found is make changes that have no effect like adding
 blank lines to ERT in the top level document.
   Is there a better way?

Lots of this will be fixed in 1.5.0.

Jürgen


Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen
This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): Bei der 



Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach 
römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben. i.e. the dot 
has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot 
find this rule in the 2004 Duden (23. Auflage), though.
I have 2006 Duden (24. Auflage) and can't find it either. I don't know 
why the'd bulid this option in that package. Very strange.


I found some discussion at:
Help with the (non-existent) points in the numbering of parts and appendices
http://www.komascript.de/node/604

When I will this text finshed I gonna contact the author of koma script 
for clarification.
Strange that no one else wondered about this. Especially the issue 
reported for figures and tables is wired:

http://www.komascript.de/node/604#comment-1416


What can I do to get the above described formatting?


I don't know if it is possible. You can leave the dot or have it, but 
having it with letters and leaving it with numbers is not desired.

Yes, I'll use pointlessnumbers.

Thanks for answering, through!



Re: Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Fritz Bein

Am 31.05.2007, 17:45 Uhr, schrieb Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:22, Fritz Bein wrote:


You are right - WinEdt only compiles it one time which is sufficient if
there are only minor changes in the document. Is there any possibility  
of

short compile in lyx, too?

Regards, Fritz


I don't know much about Windows, but in Linux I just make a shellscript  
(like
a batch file) called jj, and use that to compile. If I were willing not  
to
reindex and the like, I could make another one called jjj that just does  
a

short compile.

Either way, what I do for speed is compile only to .dvi, and then view  
the

dvi. For instance:

lyx --export latex myfile.lyx
latex myfile.tex
xdvi myfile.dvi

Much shorter than if I compiled all the way to ps or pdf (unless I were  
using

pdflatex, of course).

By scripting it, YOU tell it exactly what to include and what to leave  
out.


HTH

SteveT

Steve Litt
Author: Universal Troubleshooting Process books and courseware
http://www.troubleshooters.com/


Thanks for your help.

Such a script works fine for me (Using the command-shell of windows).

Apart from that I have cleaned up my directory pathes. Multiple versions  
of python and ghostscript did seem to make the system faster :-)


Regards, Fritz





Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Dominik Waßenhoven

Tim Michelsen schrieb am 31.05.2007:

When I will this text finshed I gonna contact the author of koma script 
for clarification.
Strange that no one else wondered about this. Especially the issue 
reported for figures and tables is wired:

http://www.komascript.de/node/604#comment-1416


I don't know if you understood it already (or maybe I did not get your 
point). There are two possibilities according to Duden 1996:


Possibility 1 (no appendix):
1 Chapter
1.1 Section
1.2 Section
2 Chapter
2.1 Section
..
Figure 2.1
..

Possibility 2 (with appendix):
1. Chapter
1.1. Section
1.2. Section
2. Chapter
2.1. Section
..
Figure 2.1.
..
A. Appendix 1
A.1. Section
A.2. Section
B. Appendix 2
B.1. Section
..
Figure B.1.
..

In *both* cases, referring to a sectino results e.g. in Section 1.2 
(i.e. without the dot after the last number!).


The KOMA option pointlessnumbers gives you the result of possibility 
1, even if there is an appendix.


The KOMA option pointednumbers gives you the result of possibility 2, 
even if there is no appendix.


If you have none of the options set, KOMA decides which case is 
appropriate, i.e.: if you have no appendix, possibility 1 is used, if 
you have an appendix, possibility 2 is used. This feature may need more 
LaTeX runs of which LyX is not aware, so it could be that the change 
does not take effect in the first output after you added or removed an 
appendix. But if you change something in the lyx document and compile 
again, the change should become effective.


Regards,
Dominik.-




Longtable Rotate

2007-05-31 Thread James
I am using 1.5 beta 3 on a Mac.

When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
degrees² then I get an error message when compiling.  Either of the options
work independently, but not together...

I haven¹t tested this with earlier versions of Lyx.

Any suggestsions?

James


Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen
I don't know if you understood it already (or maybe I did not get your 
point).

I understood you answer.


There are two possibilities according to Duden 1996:
I check my Duden once again and couldn't find it. No way. The new Duden 
even has no R.x rules. they are named K.x

I you have a page numer or something that would be great.

In *both* cases, referring to a sectino results e.g. in Section 1.2 
(i.e. without the dot after the last number!).


The KOMA option pointlessnumbers gives you the result of possibility 
1, even if there is an appendix.


The KOMA option pointednumbers gives you the result of possibility 2, 
even if there is no appendix.

Thanks for your clarification.

Since I have a appendix LaTeX came up with the automatic solution 
described in the documentation.


What troubles me most is that it also puts these dots after the words 
Figure and Table in all captions which not desired at all.

This was written also at:
http://www.komascript.de/node/604#comment-1416

appendix. But if you change something in the lyx document and compile 
again, the change should become effective.

I try. If not I'd rather switch off than having also doted captions.

Greetings,
Tim



Bug: bibliography-case problem in Lyx 1.5 Beta2

2007-05-31 Thread Valter Filipe Silva

Hello,


I'm using lyx 1.5 beta2 under windows XP.
There are a problem in the bibliography management system.
I choose insert citation and, the list of the reference appear in lower 
case.
I choose a bibtex entry named nolte:01 (in .bib file it is Nolte:01) 
and, in Lyx it appears [nolte:01] instead of [Nolte:01].
When i compile the document it appear [?]. If i try to change the case 
in the bib file for nolte:01 or to insert tex code (\cite{Nolte:01}) it 
works fine.


Is this bug corrected in version Beta3 ?
Best Regards


VFS



--
-
Valter Filipe Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Departamento de Electrónica e Telecomunicações
Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Águeda
Universidade de Aveiro
3810-193 Aveiro




Bug: bibliography-case problem in Lyx 1.5 Beta2

2007-05-31 Thread Valter Filipe Silva

Hello,


I'm using lyx 1.5 beta2 under windows XP.
There are a problem in the bibliography management system.
I choose insert citation and, the list of the reference appear in lower 
case.
I choose a bibtex entry named nolte:01 (in .bib file it is Nolte:01) 
and, in Lyx it appears [nolte:01] instead of [Nolte:01].
When i compile the document it appear [?]. If i try to change the case 
in the bib file for nolte:01 or to insert tex code (\cite{Nolte:01}) it 
works fine.


Is this bug corrected in version Beta3 ?
Best Regards


VFS



--
-
Valter Filipe Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Departamento de Electrónica e Telecomunicações
Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Águeda
Universidade de Aveiro
3810-193 Aveiro






Re: Bug: bibliography-case problem in Lyx 1.5 Beta2

2007-05-31 Thread Richard Heck

Valter Filipe Silva wrote:

I'm using lyx 1.5 beta2 under windows XP.
There are a problem in the bibliography management system.
I choose insert citation and, the list of the reference appear in 
lower case.
I choose a bibtex entry named nolte:01 (in .bib file it is Nolte:01) 
and, in Lyx it appears [nolte:01] instead of [Nolte:01].
When i compile the document it appear [?]. If i try to change the case 
in the bib file for nolte:01 or to insert tex code (\cite{Nolte:01}) 
it works fine.


Is this bug corrected in version Beta3 ?

Yes.

Richard







--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto



Re: Longtable Rotate

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen



When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
degrees² then I get an error message when compiling.  Either of the options
work independently, but not together...

I use
ERT: \begin{landscape}
TABLE
ERT
\end{landscape}

Which works well.



Re: Algorithm listing

2007-05-31 Thread Graham Griffiths
Hi Helge, 

Thanks for the information and clrification regarding floats. 

I will be updating to the new version of LyX soon and will try out the insert 
program listing feature.

Regards,

graham





Re: numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 04:17:31PM +0200, Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
 Tim Michelsen schrieb am 31.05.2007:
 
 Hello,
 I am writing a text with the class report (koma-script).
 
 I am having the following problem:
 
 When I add an appendix all
 numerations will have a ending point added.
 
 I found the problem with the option pointednumbers in koma script.
 (see p. 47: 
 ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf)
  
 
 
 According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections 
 with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:
 1 first section
 2 second section
 A. Appendix
 B. AppendixB
 
 This is inconsistent and wrong. The 1996 Duden says (R4): Bei der 
 Abschnittsgliederung *mit Ziffern und Buchstaben* steht der Punkt nach 
 römischen und arabischen Zahlen und nach Großbuchstaben. i.e. the dot 
 has to be after numbers *and* letters, if there is an appendix. I cannot 
 find this rule in the 2004 Duden (23. Auflage), though.

It certainly look wrong.

1. first section
2. second section
A Appendix
B AppendixB

looks ok-ish, biutn certainlyh not the other way round.

I'd prefer the completely dotless version in any case.

Andre'


Re: Question from the wiki

2007-05-31 Thread Paul A. Rubin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a useful trick by the way. Click the button 'History' at the top 
right side of a page. Then you'll see it's history. Or use direct URI:

http://wiki.lyx.org/Site/FAQ?action=diff


Slick ... but not obvious, especially to a wiki rookie.


Perhaps it would make sense to post temporarily a response directing 
LWU here (and then remove it after some reasonable period, or after 
LWU posts something here)?


How long should we wait?


A couple of weeks should be sufficient, I would think -- or until he 
shows up on the user list, whichever comes first.


Also, maybe it would help to add something at the top of Site.FAQ 
directing people here if they have questions not appearing on the FAQ?


I added the following as the third question from the top:

Q:##Q: Should I use this site instead of the LyX users' mailing list?
A: No. The LyX users' list and this site complement each other. A good 
way to work to ask questions on the users' list, and then later on 
document the answers on this site. See [[LyX.Internet Resources]] for 
more details about the users' list.



Do you think something more is needed? (Feel free to add something at 
the top - I couldn't come up with a good text)


Looks ok to me, charitably assuming that someone reads that far before 
posting a question.  Since this is the first time it's occurred, I think 
what you wrote is fine.  If the wiki gets deluged with misplaced 
questions, we can consider something more obvious.


Incidentally, the capitalization of the table of contents of the 
Site.FAQ page is a bit funky.  I thought to edit it, but for the life of 
me I can't figure out where the command that inserts the TOC is getting 
the entries.  (Not just capitalization, either:  headings 2 and 4 seem 
to have dropped an initial word or two.)


/Paul



/Christian





Re: Longtable Rotate

2007-05-31 Thread James
Thanks - this works nicely!


On 5/31/07 10:43 AM, Tim Michelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 When creating a table, if I choose both ³Longtable² and ³Rotate table 90
 degrees² then I get an error message when compiling.  Either of the options
 work independently, but not together...
 I use
 ERT: \begin{landscape}
 TABLE
 ERT
 \end{landscape}
 
 Which works well.


Different fonts in Figure title, List of Figures

2007-05-31 Thread Rockoff, David


I am writing a report in LyX, and would like to have my figure/float titles in 
bold in the body of the report, but non-bold in the List of Figures.
What is the easiest way to accomplish this?  

I have had some success with the Insert Short Title command (putting the short 
title in non-bold, and the regular title in bold).  But this does not allow me 
to have the words Figure # in bold in the report body.

Any thoughts?

TIA,
-Dave 




Article class with theorems (layout file)

2007-05-31 Thread A S

Dear All,

I am using the document class article (AMS, sequential numbering).
This gives me a drop-down menu from which I can select environments
Theorem, Corollary, Lemma, Proof, etc. However, I do not want to use
the amsart document class but the normal class article and still have
access to the expanded drop-down menu with Theorem, Corollary, Lemma,
and so on.

Has anyone written layout files that combine the normal article class
with the expanded drop-down menu?

Thanks in advance,

Alex


Re: Article class with theorems (layout file)

2007-05-31 Thread Richard Heck

A S wrote:

Has anyone written layout files that combine the normal article class
with the expanded drop-down menu?
This is not too hard. You can start with the amsmaths.inc file. Bits 
will need to be changed---remove the \theroemstyle declarations, and 
delete all the starred ones---but it should be pretty easy. 
Alternatively, it ought to be possible to include this file if you add 
\usepackage{amsmath}. So try this:

#% Do not delete the line below; configure depends on this
#  \DeclareLaTeXClass[article.cls]{article (theorems)}

Preamble
 \usepackage{amsmaths}
EndPreamble
Input article.layout
Input amsmaths.inc


--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto



Re: A shell for launching figure editor under Mac OS

2007-05-31 Thread Mael Hilléreau

Le 31 mai 07 à 11:48, José Matos a écrit :


On Wednesday 30 May 2007 23:34:59 Mael Hilléreau wrote:

Nobody could send this password to me?

It may exist as it is mentionned in the Wiki! ;)


It was posted to this list several times, the last one was quite  
recently. Use
any search engine on the list, you should get it easily. Christian  
is the

responsible for the wiki and the person who posted those messages.


Thank you. I could upload the file.

--
Mael Hilléreau
http://mael.hillereau.free.fr





Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread Uwe Stöhr

LB schrieb:


Do you mind tyring to  the same file with ps2pdf to see if TOC and list of
figures look righ?  I want to figure out if the problem is to do with my
system (maybe old version of one of the style files, or something else).


The file I sent you can also compiled using ps2pdf without problems: The caption text is correctly 
broken at the line end, the bibliography is linked, bookmarks are generated.


regards Uwe


Re: Different fonts in Figure title, List of Figures

2007-05-31 Thread Uwe Stöhr

Rockoff, David schrieb:


I am writing a report in LyX, and would like to have my figure/float titles in 
bold in the body of the report, but non-bold in the List of Figures.
What is the easiest way to accomplish this?


Use the LaTeX-package caption. An explanation about this is given in the EmbeddedObjects manual 
which is included to LyX 1.4.4 or available here:


http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/DocumentationDevelopment#EmbeddedObjects

regards Uwe


Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread LB

Hi

This means that my setup is wrong. Because this file and EmbeddedObjects.lyx 
file do not compile properly with ps2pdf with the same problem of  long 
section names and figure captions running of the page and not wrapping 
around.


That's really the only problem I have with hyperref.

Is there a way of debuging this?

Thanks
Leo



LB schrieb:

Do you mind tyring to  the same file with ps2pdf to see if TOC and list 
of

figures look righ?  I want to figure out if the problem is to do with my
system (maybe old version of one of the style files, or something else).


The file I sent you can also compiled using ps2pdf without problems: The 
caption text is correctly broken at the line end, the bibliography is 
linked, bookmarks are generated.


regards Uwe








Lyx-1.5 beta3 and letter class

2007-05-31 Thread Deane Harder

Dear all,

I use lyx 1.5 beta3 on Mac. When I opened a New file from template and 
chose letter (g-brief-de) and tried to PDF it, I got the following error 
message: LaTeX Error: Command \Telefon already defined. The same happens 
when I open existing lyx letter documents that I wrote with lyx 1.4. Any 
ideas?


Thanks

Deane Harder


Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread Uwe Stöhr

LB schrieb:


This means that my setup is wrong. ...
Is there a way of debuging this?


Not really. I recommend that you update your hyperref version. Concerning your LaTeX-system, when 
you are using MiKTeX, use its uppdate manager, when you are using TeXLive, update it to TeXLive 
2007, when you are still using teTeX, update it to TeXLive.


regards Uwe


Re: Force document regeneration

2007-05-31 Thread Phil
Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Sometimes Lyx does not detect that I've changed a child document and when I
  select View-update-pdf(pdflatex), it does not regenerate the pdf.  The
  only work around I've found is make changes that have no effect like adding
  blank lines to ERT in the top level document.
Is there a better way?
 
 Lots of this will be fixed in 1.5.0.
 

I think it would still be useful to have some kind of force regeneration
mechanism.  Lyx cannot know about all possible changes that require a rerun of
Latex.  For example, today I had a problem where pdftex could not find a new
font I installed because I had forgotten to run updmap. After running updmap, I
had to trick Lyx into rerunning latex.

Phil






Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen
I cannot help you here as I don't have the file. I assume the reason is 
one of your strange preamble hacks. To find the reason, copy the file 
and remove everything except of one text line. If you then still have 
problems, remove the preamble stuff step by step until you found the 
problematic code.

For the debugging of your preamble I recommend to put it in a external file.

Put the following in preable part of your document settings:
\input{preamble.tex}

Then create and edit preamble.tex with the editor of your choice.

This is also an advantage becaue you'll be able to reuse the preable, 
have different versions etc.




Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Jean Kaplan

Right, I forgot to say that I work on Mac OS 10.4.9,
Jean
Le 30 mai 07 à 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :


"Jean" == Jean Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Jean> I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
Jean> have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
Jean> remain obscure to me. 2) When I open some documents (created in
Jean> version 1.4.4) the preview of mathematical formula only works
Jean> for new formulae, for some others it works immediately for the
Jean> whole document. Is there a way to force the preview? 3) The
Jean> preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger than
Jean> in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document. How
Jean> can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan

What platform do you use?

JMarc




Re: A shell for launching figure editor under Mac OS

2007-05-31 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 23:34:59 Mael Hilléreau wrote:
> Nobody could send this password to me?
>
> It may exist as it is mentionned in the Wiki! ;)

It was posted to this list several times, the last one was quite recently. Use 
any search engine on the list, you should get it easily. Christian is the 
responsible for the wiki and the person who posted those messages.

-- 
José Abílio


Re: Algorithm listing

2007-05-31 Thread Helge Hafting

Graham Griffiths wrote:
Is there a way of getting code listings to continue onto another page using 
float algorithm.


If not, does the latest beta version support a multi-page float algorithm.
  

There is no such thing as a multi-page float.

If it isn't a float - then it can continue onto the next page.  If it is
a float, then it can't have a page break.

The whole point of a "float" is to not break up large objects
(pictures, tables, or anything you _must_ have in one piece)
and still get pretty typesetting by floating the large
objects around a bit. If you don't want it in one piece,
don't use a float. (Or use several floats with pieces of your
big algorithm.)

Breakable code listings can be done in many ways:
1. Use the "LyX-code" style for writing code.
2. Use a verbatim include, in order to pull in code from a file
3. With the last beta, use "insert->Program listing" and _don't_ make it 
a float.

4. Use a sequence of floats for your algorithm. The first ones should
   be big enough to fill pages, the last one may be smaller.

Another reason people use floats, is to get a caption they can refer
to. Unfortunately, a caption outside a float is tricky business.
The easiest is to use a heading instead - as you can refer to headings too.

The "program listing" way is nice, in that you can select whether an
algorithm should be a float or not. And there are lots of other
features. You can get automatic syntax higlighting if you like, you can
get automatic line numbers, you can include pieces from
a file (e.g. lines 10--20) and much more.

Helge Hafting






Re: Force document regeneration

2007-05-31 Thread Helge Hafting

Phil wrote:

  Sometimes Lyx does not detect that I've changed a child document and when I
select View->update->pdf(pdflatex), it does not regenerate the pdf.  The only
work around I've found is make changes that have no effect like adding blank
lines to ERT in the top level document.
  Is there a better way?
  

I usually do this:

Add one letter - save - remove it again - save


LyX don't notice that you get back to exactly the same
document, and will then regenerate all.

Now, LyX isn't supposed to need such trickery, so please
report this at bugzilla.lyx.org.  Well, perhaps you want to
try the developers mailing list first.

Helge Hafting


Including LyX documents as Appendices

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Harris

Hi everyone,

I'm writing a report in which I would like to include several other, 
previously written, LyX documents as appendices to the report. I have 
tried both the Insert->File->LyX Document and the Insert->File->Child 
Document and both have inserted the previous document as a continuation 
of the current document, rather than a sub-section of the appendix (i.e. 
each new section in the previous document creates a new appendix in the 
current document).


I've uploaded a couple PDFs so you can see the effect.
An example previously written document is: 
http://www.pongle.net/~tim/lyx/previous_report.pdf

An example document which includes the previous document is:
http://www.pongle.net/~tim/lyx/main.pdf

I had a good look through the manuals and FAQs, but couldn't see 
anything that would help me.


My ideal result would be that the included document should be printed as 
if it were a separate document, except for the page numbers and perhaps 
a header indicating that it was Appendix A of Report Blah. Another 
option would be for sections to be turned into sub-sections of the 
appendix (A.1, A.2, etc.).


If anyone has any thoughts on how I might go about accomplishing this, 
they would be most helpful.


Many Thanks,
Tim

PS
I'm using LyX 1.4.4 mainly on Windows.


Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Bennett Helm

On May 31, 2007, at 4:48 AM, Jean Kaplan wrote:


Right, I forgot to say that I work on Mac OS 10.4.9,
Jean
Le 30 mai 07 à 13:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :


"Jean" == Jean Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Jean> I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
Jean> have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
Jean> remain obscure to me.


I have not encountered frequent crashes. The only one I've noted is a  
crash on log in when LyX is in the Startup items. If you can, please  
provide more details.


By the way, are you on Intel or PPC Mac?


2) When I open some documents (created in
Jean> version 1.4.4) the preview of mathematical formula only works
Jean> for new formulae, for some others it works immediately for the
Jean> whole document. Is there a way to force the preview?


I don't use formulae much myself, so I don't have such documents to  
play with and haven't encountered this problem. Can you isolate some  
minimal examples and post them to the list?



3) The
Jean> preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger than
Jean> in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document. How
Jean> can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan


This is a known problem, though on checking I can't find it in  
bugzilla. I've just put it there (and cc-ed you on it).


Thanks for the report.

Bennett



Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Bennett Helm

On May 31, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Bennett Helm wrote:


3) The
Jean> preview of mathematical formulae is too large, much larger  
than
Jean> in 1.4.4, and much larger than in the final latex document.  
How

Jean> can I reduce the preview size? Thank you JEan


This is a known problem, though on checking I can't find it in  
bugzilla. I've just put it there (and cc-ed you on it).


Actually, I couldn't. The bug report is:



Bennett


Re: A few problems with Lyx 1.5 beta3

2007-05-31 Thread Maria Gouskova

>> Jean> I have installed lyx 1.5 beta 3 version (I used 1.4.4), and I
>> Jean> have a few problems 1) Crashes are frequent, for reasons which
>> Jean> remain obscure to me.

I have not encountered frequent crashes. The only one I've noted is a
crash on log in when LyX is in the Startup items. If you can, please
provide more details.


I discovered at least one source of the crashes: when material is
selected in a table across several cells using Shift+arrow or
Shift+Cmd+arrow, LyX 1.5.0b3 reliably crashes. On Intel Macs for sure.

Bug already submitted to bugzilla.

Maria


Re: Questions regarding hyperref

2007-05-31 Thread LB
Hi Uwe

> pdflatex is much faster and the resulting PDFs are not larger for me.
> You caption problem must have another reason.

Do you mind tyring to  the same file with ps2pdf to see if TOC and list of
figures look righ?  I want to figure out if the problem is to do with my
system (maybe old version of one of the style files, or something else).

Thanks
Leo



Speed of Lyx

2007-05-31 Thread Fritz Bein

Hi,

I have some problems with the speed of Lyx 1.5 (beta). Maybe it occurred  
after the installation of MikTex 2.6. A 10-page document takes approx. 35  
sec. to compile and display with Yap. The same document in WinEdt takes  
only 9 sec. on my notebook.


Is this normal, or may there be something wrong in my system?

Regards, Fritz


numbering problem using appendix with koma-script

2007-05-31 Thread Tim Michelsen

Hello,
I am writing a text with the class "report (koma-script)".

I am having the following problem:

When I add an appendix all
numerations will have a ending point added.

I found the problem with the option "pointednumbers" in koma script.
(see p. 47: 
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/koma-script/scrguien.pdf)


According to the documentation and German grammar rules normal sections 
with numbers should not have a point whereas appendices should have one:

1 first section
2 second section
A. Appendix
B. AppendixB

koma script creates this formating through storing this information in 
the *.aux-file. Latex should be run twice to include this. When I 
preview a postscript (CTRL+T) and and directly actualize it directly 
afterwards (CTRL+SHIFT+T) I cannot see any effect.


What can I do to get the above described formatting?

I had the same problem with having a passage like "see another author 
\cite{author_x}" in my bibtex file.


Thank you for your help!

Timmie



  1   2   >