I have inserted a few lines of code in a listing environment. I have
right-clicked the Listing tab and made sure that the Line numbering is set
to none. But still the line numbers appear in the left side. How do I
disable linenumbering?
--
View this message in context:
bigblop schrieb:
I have inserted a few lines of code in a listing environment. I have
right-clicked the Listing tab and made sure that the Line numbering is set
to none. But still the line numbers appear in the left side.
I can't reproduce this. This works fine in the examples given in
Hey, @sshole? You still breathing?!
Have you seen my original posts and attempts at un-subscibing? If
yes, then you must be a moron b/c it's clear that my actions were in
alignment with the directions. If you haven't, then, well, you're a
moron for speaking out of turn.
Its nice to see
FYI: I have begun to overtly express my disapproval of the the rude and
vulgar behaviors I have experienced with the LyX group - via the many
well-known public forums. I firmly believe that the public at large
should always be aware of shady practices by any entity, whether
organizational or
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
--
http://www.unmusic.co.uk Michael Reed -- technology, gender, and geek culture
freelance
2008/7/30 killermike [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
That thread is how I discovered Lyx and why I signed
That thread is how I discovered Lyx and why I signed up for the list
yesterday. I will now go back to lurking, and I hope to read less
threads of the 'holy moly' type. It has been a long time since I've seen
that kind of behaviour on a FOSS mailing list.
The LyX developers and mailing list
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
I find this response quite topical
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
Having read most of the responses, they can
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make
these insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Rudi van der Linde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, @sshole? You still breathing?!
Have you seen my original posts and attempts at un-subscibing? If
yes, then you must be a moron b/c it's clear that my actions were in
alignment with the directions. If you
2008/7/30 Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/7/30 Steve Litt[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Is LyX only good for writing books, then?
Nope. I write letters, articles, reports, and presentations using LyX. Of
course, I did use it to write my book (using Springer's monograph class) and
that's where I really learned LaTeX, too. As I needed the
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the arrow.
/Paul
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Is LyX only good for writing books, then?
I use LyX for most writing of any kind. I find it most useful for writing
technical reports, where I find on average it reduces the total time I spend
on the writing by about 50%. My most recent report,
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:45:38PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
On 25.07.08, Sebastian Rohrer wrote:
Hi,
I have a relatively large lyx document that does not compile. The error
message is:
Some characters of your document are probably not representable in the
chosen encoding. Changing
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/7/30 Steve Litt[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:00, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
I say we just treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] as spam and block his
email from all LyX mailing lists. Obviously, the emailer is a robot,
not capable of reading or following instructions or providing
intelligent feedback if something is wrong.
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
technical
documents,
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000 words
long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
I beg to differ, quite strongly. The moment you write something
FWIW, my rule of thumb is that if it's not a job for a text editor
(NoteTab Light or Notepad++ on Windows, GEdit on Ubuntu), and it's not a
letter, then it's a job for LyX. The only reason I don't use LyX for
letters is that our office stationary has boilerplate in both the top
margin and the
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with
LyX / LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking
etc.). I've tried sharing drafts with PDF but that requires colleagues
to purchase full
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
FWIW, my rule of thumb is that if it's not a job for a text editor
(NoteTab Light or Notepad++ on Windows, GEdit on Ubuntu), and it's not
a letter, then it's a job for LyX. The only reason I don't use LyX
for letters is that our office stationary has boilerplate in both
Denné Reed wrote:
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with LyX
/ LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking etc.).
LyX does have change tracking. I've used it. Unfamiliarity is of
Steve Litt wrote:
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000 words
long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
I don't want to come off as someone who is purely defensive of LyX but I
beg to differ with this point. I write all of my articles in LyX and I
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:42, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
technical
documents,
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000
words long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 17:17, Denné Reed wrote:
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with
LyX / LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking
etc.). I've tried sharing drafts with PDF
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:04:42PM -0500, Travis wrote:
I tried to add some graphics to my security_concepts paper, but when I try
to convert to HTML I get:
lyx -e html security_concepts.lyx
Including LaTeX commands
Unknown command \batchmode, (0 user-defined) Line 1
Unknown
Hi! all
I have been testing the LyX 1.6 beta4 and I have found that numbered
environments do not respond while unnumbered ones (e.g., section*, etc) do
work. Can someone help me to find a workaround? My beta software has been
compiled on Ubuntu 8.04.
Thanking in advance
Ven. Pandita
I have inserted a few lines of code in a listing environment. I have
right-clicked the Listing tab and made sure that the Line numbering is set
to none. But still the line numbers appear in the left side. How do I
disable linenumbering?
--
View this message in context:
bigblop schrieb:
I have inserted a few lines of code in a listing environment. I have
right-clicked the Listing tab and made sure that the Line numbering is set
to none. But still the line numbers appear in the left side.
I can't reproduce this. This works fine in the examples given in
Hey, @sshole? You still breathing?!
Have you seen my original posts and attempts at un-subscibing? If
yes, then you must be a moron b/c it's clear that my actions were in
alignment with the directions. If you haven't, then, well, you're a
moron for speaking out of turn.
Its nice to see
FYI: I have begun to overtly express my disapproval of the the rude and
vulgar behaviors I have experienced with the LyX group - via the many
well-known public forums. I firmly believe that the public at large
should always be aware of shady practices by any entity, whether
organizational or
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
--
http://www.unmusic.co.uk Michael Reed -- technology, gender, and geek culture
freelance
2008/7/30 killermike [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
That thread is how I discovered Lyx and why I signed
That thread is how I discovered Lyx and why I signed up for the list
yesterday. I will now go back to lurking, and I hope to read less
threads of the 'holy moly' type. It has been a long time since I've seen
that kind of behaviour on a FOSS mailing list.
The LyX developers and mailing list
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
I find this response quite topical
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
Having read most of the responses, they can
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make
these insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Rudi van der Linde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, @sshole? You still breathing?!
Have you seen my original posts and attempts at un-subscibing? If
yes, then you must be a moron b/c it's clear that my actions were in
alignment with the directions. If you
2008/7/30 Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/7/30 Steve Litt[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Is LyX only good for writing books, then?
Nope. I write letters, articles, reports, and presentations using LyX. Of
course, I did use it to write my book (using Springer's monograph class) and
that's where I really learned LaTeX, too. As I needed the
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the arrow.
/Paul
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Is LyX only good for writing books, then?
I use LyX for most writing of any kind. I find it most useful for writing
technical reports, where I find on average it reduces the total time I spend
on the writing by about 50%. My most recent report,
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:45:38PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
On 25.07.08, Sebastian Rohrer wrote:
Hi,
I have a relatively large lyx document that does not compile. The error
message is:
Some characters of your document are probably not representable in the
chosen encoding. Changing
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/7/30 Steve Litt[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:00, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
I say we just treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] as spam and block his
email from all LyX mailing lists. Obviously, the emailer is a robot,
not capable of reading or following instructions or providing
intelligent feedback if something is wrong.
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
technical
documents,
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000 words
long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
I beg to differ, quite strongly. The moment you write something
FWIW, my rule of thumb is that if it's not a job for a text editor
(NoteTab Light or Notepad++ on Windows, GEdit on Ubuntu), and it's not a
letter, then it's a job for LyX. The only reason I don't use LyX for
letters is that our office stationary has boilerplate in both the top
margin and the
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with
LyX / LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking
etc.). I've tried sharing drafts with PDF but that requires colleagues
to purchase full
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
FWIW, my rule of thumb is that if it's not a job for a text editor
(NoteTab Light or Notepad++ on Windows, GEdit on Ubuntu), and it's not
a letter, then it's a job for LyX. The only reason I don't use LyX
for letters is that our office stationary has boilerplate in both
Denné Reed wrote:
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with LyX
/ LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking etc.).
LyX does have change tracking. I've used it. Unfamiliarity is of
Steve Litt wrote:
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000 words
long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
I don't want to come off as someone who is purely defensive of LyX but I
beg to differ with this point. I write all of my articles in LyX and I
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:42, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
technical
documents,
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000
words long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 17:17, Denné Reed wrote:
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with
LyX / LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking
etc.). I've tried sharing drafts with PDF
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:04:42PM -0500, Travis wrote:
I tried to add some graphics to my security_concepts paper, but when I try
to convert to HTML I get:
lyx -e html security_concepts.lyx
Including LaTeX commands
Unknown command \batchmode, (0 user-defined) Line 1
Unknown
Hi! all
I have been testing the LyX 1.6 beta4 and I have found that numbered
environments do not respond while unnumbered ones (e.g., section*, etc) do
work. Can someone help me to find a workaround? My beta software has been
compiled on Ubuntu 8.04.
Thanking in advance
Ven. Pandita
I have inserted a few lines of code in a listing environment. I have
right-clicked the Listing tab and made sure that the Line numbering is set
to none. But still the line numbers appear in the left side. How do I
disable linenumbering?
--
View this message in context:
bigblop schrieb:
I have inserted a few lines of code in a listing environment. I have
right-clicked the Listing tab and made sure that the Line numbering is set
to none. But still the line numbers appear in the left side.
I can't reproduce this. This works fine in the examples given in
Hey, @sshole? You still breathing?!
Have you seen my original posts and "attempts" at un-subscibing? If
yes, then you must be a moron b/c it's clear that my actions were "in
alignment" with the directions. If you haven't, then, well, you're a
moron for speaking out of turn.
Its nice to
FYI: I have begun to overtly express my disapproval of the the rude and
vulgar behaviors I have experienced with the LyX group - via the many
well-known public forums. I firmly believe that the public at large
should always be aware of shady practices by any entity, whether
organizational or
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
--
http://www.unmusic.co.uk Michael Reed -- technology, gender, and geek culture
freelance
2008/7/30 killermike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
> thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
>
That thread is how I discovered Lyx and why I
> That thread is how I discovered Lyx and why I signed up for the list
> yesterday. I will now go back to lurking, and I hope to read less
> threads of the 'holy moly' type. It has been a long time since I've seen
> that kind of behaviour on a FOSS mailing list.
The LyX developers and mailing
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
> The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
> thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
I find this response quite topical
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
> The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
> thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
>
> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/29/0039201
Having read most of the responses, they
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
rgheck wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
A paper I'm writing has a googolplex of symbols with an
\overrightarrow overhead. What would be the best way to make
these insertions in math mode as quick as possible?
Well, you can shorten
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Rudi van der Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Hey, @sshole? You still breathing?!
>>>
>>> Have you seen my original posts and "attempts" at un-subscibing? If
>>> yes, then you must be a moron b/c it's clear that my actions were "in
>>> alignment" with the
2008/7/30 Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
>> The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
>> thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
>>
>>
Dotan Cohen wrote:
2008/7/30 Steve Litt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
thread brings up quite a lot of references to LyX in the comments.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Is LyX only good for writing books, then?
Nope. I write letters, articles, reports, and presentations using LyX. Of
course, I did use it to write my book (using Springer's monograph class) and
that's where I really learned LaTeX, too. As I needed the
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the arrow.
/Paul
On Wednesday 30 July 2008, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Is LyX only good for writing books, then?
I use LyX for most writing of any kind. I find it most useful for writing
technical reports, where I find on average it reduces the total time I spend
on the writing by about 50%. My most recent report,
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Bruce Pourciau wrote:
However, I'd be tempted to take a different route. Pick a key
combination you don't have much use for and bind it to 'math-insert
\overrightarrow'. Then whack that key combo while you're in a math
inset and type whatever your vectorizing under the
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:45:38PM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
> On 25.07.08, Sebastian Rohrer wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I have a relatively large lyx document that does not compile. The error
> > message is:
>
> > "Some characters of your document are probably not representable in the
> > chosen
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > 2008/7/30 Steve Litt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 08:21, killermike wrote:
> >>> The original question that starts is poorly conceived but this Slashdot
> >>> thread brings up quite a lot of
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:00, Bob Lounsbury wrote:
> I say we just treat [EMAIL PROTECTED] as spam and block his
> email from all LyX mailing lists. Obviously, the emailer is a robot,
> not capable of reading or following instructions or providing
> intelligent feedback if something is wrong.
Steve Litt wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
technical
documents,
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000 words
long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
I beg to differ, quite strongly. The moment you write something
FWIW, my rule of thumb is that if it's not a job for a text editor
(NoteTab Light or Notepad++ on Windows, GEdit on Ubuntu), and it's not a
letter, then it's a job for LyX. The only reason I don't use LyX for
letters is that our office stationary has boilerplate in both the top
margin and the
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with
LyX / LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking
etc.). I've tried sharing drafts with PDF but that requires colleagues
to purchase full
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
FWIW, my rule of thumb is that if it's not a job for a text editor
(NoteTab Light or Notepad++ on Windows, GEdit on Ubuntu), and it's not
a letter, then it's a job for LyX. The only reason I don't use LyX
for letters is that our office stationary has boilerplate in both
Denné Reed wrote:
I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with LyX
/ LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking etc.).
LyX does have change tracking. I've used it. Unfamiliarity is of
Steve Litt wrote:
Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000 words
long. Shorter docs are easier in quick and dirty OO.
I don't want to come off as someone who is purely defensive of LyX but I
beg to differ with this point. I write all of my articles in LyX and I
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:42, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 11:24, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> technical
> >> documents,
> >
> > Again, a great application for LyX assuming the tech doc is over 10,000
> > words long. Shorter docs are easier in
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 17:17, Denné Reed wrote:
> I use LyX for scientific papers but have had problems with both
> collaborators and editors. Many collaborators are unfamiliar with
> LyX / LaTeX and it lacks strong collaboration tools (change tracking
> etc.). I've tried sharing drafts with
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:04:42PM -0500, Travis wrote:
> I tried to add some graphics to my security_concepts paper, but when I try
> to convert to HTML I get:
>
> lyx -e html security_concepts.lyx
> Including LaTeX commands
> Unknown command \batchmode, (0 user-defined) Line 1
>
Hi! all
I have been testing the LyX 1.6 beta4 and I have found that numbered
environments do not respond while unnumbered ones (e.g., "section*", etc) do
work. Can someone help me to find a workaround? My beta software has been
compiled on Ubuntu 8.04.
Thanking in advance
Ven. Pandita
90 matches
Mail list logo
