Re: /etc/mail/aliases question

On 2023-06-14 18:32, Thomas Bohl wrote: The default is -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  2045 Oct 28  2022 aliases My question is - why does smtpd output what it does - particularly the "failed to update table" portion ? Because _smtpd does not have read access to /etc/mail/aliases.

Re: /etc/mail/aliases question

). The default is -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2045 Oct 28 2022 aliases My question is - why does smtpd output what it does - particularly the "failed to update table" portion ? Because _smtpd does not have read access to /etc/mail/aliases.

/etc/mail/aliases question

Hi, I have a question regarding some output to: /var/log/maillog when I update the: /etc/mail/aliases file. If I make a change to: /etc/mail/aliases: $ doas vim /etc/mail/aliases $ doas newaliases I see the following in: /var/log/maillog: ... server smtpd[50072]: /etc/mail/aliases

Re: Question Regarding The 'poolp' Guide On How To Deploy A Mail Server's Last Portion Regarding Dovecot With 'sieve' Scripts

Thanks for this idea, yeah I posted about this on that mailing list too, thanks for the suggestion! Happy to have tried OpenBSD for a mailing server though, its been fun so far :) On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, at 3:36 AM, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:23:35AM +, Samuel Banya

Re: Question Regarding The 'poolp' Guide On How To Deploy A Mail Server's Last Portion Regarding Dovecot With 'sieve' Scripts

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:23:35AM +, Samuel Banya wrote: > This is what was present AFTER my changes in > '/etc/dovecot/conf.d/90-plugin.conf' (aka I followed this post's > workaround > http://dovecot.2317879.n4.nabble.com/sieve-compile-error-td70414.html): Visually comparing this with my

Question Regarding The 'poolp' Guide On How To Deploy A Mail Server's Last Portion Regarding Dovecot With 'sieve' Scripts

Hello everyone, I've been following the "poolp" guide on how to deploy an email server on OpenBSD: - https://poolp.org/posts/2019-09-14/setting-up-a-mail-server-with-opensmtpd-dovecot-and-rspamd/ I'm currently at the very end of the guide in which he is using sieve with Dovecot to do some

Hello and mixed dex/dns operation question

I have been using opensmtpd for fully dex operation, as described in https://fedoramagazine.org/decentralize-common-fedora-apps-cjdns/ (Yes the smtpd.conf has changed a bit since that article was written.) Now, I wanted to also relay outgoing mail that is *not* a raw IP through a server. Using

Can't get opensmtpd to match rules and deliver to dovecot (possibly another newbie question)

Hi again! About two weeks ago I had my first newbie-question where this list helped me – thank you again! Back then Marcus Merighi recommended that I already make opensmtpd validate if the recipient exists and refuse if he doesn’t. I am having a hard time accomplishing this. I am

Re: warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question)

Hello Fabian, not answering your question and not solving you problem, but after your introduction I feel compelled to say: f...@1lb.eu (Fabian Müller), 2020.08.16 (Sun) 02:15 (CEST): > 1. take e-mails on port 25, check via mysql if it's for a domain it is > responsible for and then forwa

Re: warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question)

Hi Edgar, hi Reio, smptd -dv did the job: It turned out, that opensmtpd could not connect to the db because there was a Space after the db-name. So „host db.example.com “ instead of „host db.example.com“. Now it connects fine but I get illegal table-api version which prevents opensmtpd from

Re: warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question)

On 16.08.2020 03:15, Fabian Müller wrote: So what we know: It has something to do with the mysql-tables. What I don’t understand is, what opensmtpd is trying to do which leads to that error. To my understanding opensmtpd should only try to connect to the database if it needs to read from the

Re: warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question)

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 02:15:52AM +0200, Fabian M??ller wrote: > > is your user allowed to connect to the host above? > > ** Which host do you mean? mx01 is allowed to connect to db (ha-proxy) and > even db1, db2, db3 directly (which I also tried, but did not change > anything). And the

Re: warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question)

Hi Edgar thanks for your reply! Von: Edgar Pettijohn Datum: Sonntag, 16. August 2020 um 01:00 An: Fabian M??ller Cc: Betreff: Re: warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question) On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:13:41AM +0200, Fabian M??ller wrote: Hi! I

Re: warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question)

On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:13:41AM +0200, Fabian M??ller wrote: > Hi! > > I am hopefully a new opensmtpd user and before I???ll start off with my first > newbie question I???d be happy to briefly introduce myself: I???m Fabian from > Germany. Actually I am stud

warn: table-proc: pipe closed (Probably mySQL-hassle and a newbie-question)

Hi! I am hopefully a new opensmtpd user and before I’ll start off with my first newbie question I’d be happy to briefly introduce myself: I’m Fabian from Germany. Actually I am studying german law, but as – in opposite to legal work – anyone who wants to can “do” IT-stuff I’ve also been

Re: Newbie config question

David Favor wrote: I've been wrestling with this for days with no progress. Can someone drop me a v6.6.4 config to do something similar to the following. da...@davidfavor.com - maildir i...@davidfavor.com- forward to da...@davidfavor.com supp...@davidfavor.com - forward to

Re: Newbie config question

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 11:28:12AM -0500, David Favor wrote: > I've been wrestling with this for days with no progress. > > Can someone drop me a v6.6.4 config to do something similar to the following. > >da...@davidfavor.com - maildir >i...@davidfavor.com- forward to

Re: Newbie config question

On my phone but I'll show you tomorrow if no one answers before, this is trivialGillesOn Jun 5, 2020 18:28, David Favor wrote:I've been wrestling with this for days with no progress. Can someone drop me a v6.6.4 config to do something similar to the following.     da...@davidfavor.com   -

Newbie config question

I've been wrestling with this for days with no progress. Can someone drop me a v6.6.4 config to do something similar to the following. da...@davidfavor.com - maildir i...@davidfavor.com- forward to da...@davidfavor.com supp...@davidfavor.com - forward to f...@helpdesk.com using

Re: bgp-spamd question

Thanks Pierre-Edouard, Well that's okay. Perhaps they ended the project. V/r, Bryan On 4/11/2020 10:48 AM, Pierre-Edouard wrote: Hi, I was also using bgpd-spamd, and it stopped working recently as well. It's not your config, issue is seen on my side too.(was working fine for many months

bgp-spamd question

Hi folks, I was able to setup my OpenSMTPd on my server maybe 1-2 years ago, and everything has been working fine. However, recently the bgp-spamd list that comes down into my bgp settings has not been populating. As far as email everything is still working I just don't get those bgp lists

Re: filter question

On Mar 9, 2020 1:34 AM, Martijn van Duren wrote: > > On 3/6/20 5:00 PM, epektasis wrote: > > Greetings.  I have my own blacklist file of email addresses > > (some in the format microcen...@microcenter.com and some in > > the format *@squaredeals.com), one per line.  I would like to > > filter

Re: filter question

On 3/6/20 5:00 PM, epektasis wrote: > Greetings. I have my own blacklist file of email addresses > (some in the format microcen...@microcenter.com and some in > the format *@squaredeals.com), one per line. I would like to > filter each incoming email so that a mail-from address > that matches

filter question

Greetings. I have my own blacklist file of email addresses (some in the format microcen...@microcenter.com and some in the format *@squaredeals.com), one per line. I would like to filter each incoming email so that a mail-from address that matches any line in the blacklist file will go to a

Re: Question about OpenSMTPD and Debian package and filters/spam filtering

On 8/21/19 12:50 PM, Michiel van Es wrote: I am running a small VPS with 1 GB memory with Debian 10 amd64 with OpenSMTPD (6.0.3) Hello, can you really use Buster's official opensmptd package? I tried it about 3 weeks ago and it was broken out of the box for me (can't really remember what

Re: builtin filter regex question

> > :) > > > As of today, there will be no option but to craft your regex to contain > > both the pattern > > you want to match AND exclude [ as far as I see it. > > But that AND EXCLUDE (aka AND NOT) is not possible with re_format(7), > because no zero-wid

Re: builtin filter regex question

ecause no zero-width negative lookahead or similar tricks are available, right? I wonder if abusing "match" instead of filtering is an option here, with match I have the negotiation operator available, so something like this would probably work, right? match ! helo regex "^\[&qu

Re: builtin filter regex question

October 24, 2019 8:35 PM, "Joerg Jung" wrote: > Hi, > > I used some regex filters in the past which I'm trying to convert to the > latest builtin filters. In particular, I stumbled over a HELO filter, > which rejects non-FQDN HELO forcing SMTP protocol, aka: > Sendmail FEATURE(block_bad_helo)

builtin filter regex question

Hi, I used some regex filters in the past which I'm trying to convert to the latest builtin filters. In particular, I stumbled over a HELO filter, which rejects non-FQDN HELO forcing SMTP protocol, aka: Sendmail FEATURE(block_bad_helo) or Postfix reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname I had significant

Re: Question about match auth with the new syntax.

On Aug 28, 2019 1:52 PM, Reio Remma wrote: > > Hello! > > I've pretty much converted my setup to the new syntax now and I'm > wondering if I get this right. > > I understand that from local was changed to not include authenticated > users, but my question is does

Question about match auth with the new syntax.

Hello! I've pretty much converted my setup to the new syntax now and I'm wondering if I get this right. I understand that from local was changed to not include authenticated users, but my question is does "match auth" match both authenticated and local users? I currently hav

Re: table api question

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 08:19:00AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > 24 ao??t 2019 02:59 "Edgar Pettijohn" a ??crit: > > > I am writing a table-lua, however the table_lua_update function doesn't > > appear to be called. > > Here are relevant pieces of the code. > > > > The lookup function

table api question

I am writing a table-lua, however the table_lua_update function doesn't appear to be called. Here are relevant pieces of the code. The lookup function works. However, it would be more ideal to have the update() called early to fill in the tables for the other functions. As is the lookup() has

Re: Question about OpenSMTPD and Debian package and filters/spam filtering

> On 21 Aug 2019, at 13:58, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:50:10PM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote: >> Hi! >> > > Hi, > > >> I am running a small VPS with 1 GB memory with Debian 10 amd64 with >> OpenSMTPD (6.0.3) for private email and am looking what my best options

Re: Question about OpenSMTPD and Debian package and filters/spam filtering

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:50:10PM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote: > Hi! > Hi, > I am running a small VPS with 1 GB memory with Debian 10 amd64 with OpenSMTPD > (6.0.3) for private email and am looking what my best options are to limit > spam. > I know there are some filters from Joerg >

Question about OpenSMTPD and Debian package and filters/spam filtering

Hi! I am running a small VPS with 1 GB memory with Debian 10 amd64 with OpenSMTPD (6.0.3) for private email and am looking what my best options are to limit spam. I know there are some filters from Joerg (https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@opensmtpd.org/msg04402.html) but am not sure if these

Re: Question about backup mx

Ok, thanks for the clarification. I guess one way to avoid the wait is to just manually schedule all. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018, 8:48 AM Gilles Chehade On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > > If I have two mail exchange servers and the primary one goes down, do > > I then

Re: Question about backup mx

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > If I have two mail exchange servers and the primary one goes down, do > I then have to manually issue an smtpctl schedule all to resume > delivery from the backup to the primary? > no, you just have to way for the backup one to

Re: userbase question

Hi Gilles, Thank you for your advice about using wrappers. I decided to implement an mda wrapper as per your suggestion. It is interesting that I still needed to specify either an mbox or maildir in the syntax when I specify a wrapper. In this case, it doesn't seem to matter if I use mbox or

Re: userbase question

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 09:54:05AM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > I am hoping not to have to use sqlite tables. I like the simplicity of > file-based configuration. just for the record: besides table-specific features, all smtpd features are usable from file configurations since I write the

Re: userbase question

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 09:11:02AM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote: > Hello misc@, > > Below is my configuration file. I am trying to use the userbase > parameter and when I try to send an email to myself, I get the 550 > Invalid Recipient error. I am trying to get the usrbase parameter > working so

Re: userbase question

Sent from my Verizon SmartphoneOn Aug 27, 2018 8:54 AM, Matt Schwartz wrote:>> I am hoping not to have to use sqlite tables. I like the simplicity of > file-based configuration. > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:47 AM Reio Remma wrote: > > > > Iirc I got the .forward file working with sqlite tables,

Re: userbase question

I am hoping not to have to use sqlite tables. I like the simplicity of file-based configuration. On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:47 AM Reio Remma wrote: > > Iirc I got the .forward file working with sqlite tables, where the user query > also returned the virtual user’s maildir as an extra parameter. >

Re: userbase question

Iirc I got the .forward file working with sqlite tables, where the user query also returned the virtual user’s maildir as an extra parameter. Good luck, Reio > On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:11, Matt Schwartz wrote: > > Hello misc@, > > Below is my configuration file. I am trying to use the userbase

userbase question

Hello misc@, Below is my configuration file. I am trying to use the userbase parameter and when I try to send an email to myself, I get the 550 Invalid Recipient error. I am trying to get the usrbase parameter working so that I can add a .forward file for virtual users as per the table(5) man

Re: AW: hello! ... and first question

On 22/05/18 21:52, Damiano Venturin wrote: > On 22/05/18 06:48, Michael Taubert wrote: >> >> Hi Dam! >> >>   >> > Hello! >> >> Did you try to add „example—com“ to your virtual Domains table? E.g. >> https://www.opensmtpd.org/faq/example1.html Let me change the angle a little. What's the best

Re: AW: hello! ... and first question

On 22/05/18 06:48, Michael Taubert wrote: > > Hi Dam! > >   > Hello! > > Did you try to add „example—com“ to your virtual Domains table? E.g. > https://www.opensmtpd.org/faq/example1.html > >   > ehm I'm not sure what to answer ...  yes I've added example.com but I didn't not add example--com

AW: hello! ... and first question

Hi Dam! Did you try to add „example—com“ to your virtual Domains table? E.g. https://www.opensmtpd.org/faq/example1.html Best regards, Michael Von: Damiano Venturin Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Mai 2018 01:16 An: misc@opensmtpd.org Betreff: hello! ... and first question Hello, this is Dam I'm

hello! ... and first question

Hello, this is Dam I'm in the process of freeing myself from Gmail and I'm trying to configure my debian vm as a mailserver using OpenSMTPD. Back in the days I was used to run my own mailserver with Postfix (then I don't know what happened to me and I moved to 3rd party services) but this is my

Re: Userbase question.

email, password from credentials where email=$1 and active = 'Y';  # <-- here your SQL request Sorry for my bad english. I hope that it will be helping. Olivier. *De :*Reio Remma [mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee] *Envoyé :* Sunday, February 4, 2018 3:02 PM *À :* misc@opensmtpd.org *Objet :* Userbas

Re: Userbase question.

email=$1 and active = 'Y';  # <-- here your SQL request Sorry for my bad english. I hope that it will be helping. Olivier. *De :*Reio Remma [mailto:r...@mrstuudio.ee] *Envoyé :* Sunday, February 4, 2018 3:02 PM *À :* misc@opensmtpd.org *Objet :* Userbase question. Hello! I'm trying to f

Re: Userbase question.

d.org *Objet :* Userbase question. Hello! I'm trying to figure out how I can have virtual domains/users working completely decoupled from system users. Every virtual/alias path seem to want to end up at a system account so I'm trying to use userbase, but userbase seems to take username withou

RE: Userbase question.

jet : Userbase question. Hello! I'm trying to figure out how I can have virtual domains/users working completely decoupled from system users. Every virtual/alias path seem to want to end up at a system account so I'm trying to use userbase, but userbase seems to take username without the domai

Re: Userbase question.

Hey! uid/gid are for vmail (/home/dovecot directory). I've looked at the smtpd lookup trace and query_userinfo queries the database purely by user name (without domain part). That is essentially where all virtuality fails. :/ If the database was queried by the full e-mail address (not unlike

Re: Userbase question.

what does your smtpd.conf look like? On 02/04/18 08:01, Reio Remma wrote: Hello! I'm trying to figure out how I can have virtual domains/users working completely decoupled from system users. Every virtual/alias path seem to want to end up at a system account so I'm trying to use userbase,

Re: FAQ question

Mea cup, mea maxima culpa… Thank you for the swat with the clue stick. > On Oct 30, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Bruno Pagani wrote: > Both. A passwd table is a passwd table, an auth table is an auth table. The > latter is the standard format for OpenSMTPd, the former is a

Re: FAQ question

Hi, Le 30/10/2017 à 15:23, Chris Eidem a écrit : > I’m attempting to create a multi-domain opensmtpd+dovecot set up. I have a > question about the FAQ example. In it you have the following line in the > config: > > listen on egress port 587 tls-require pki mail.example.com au

Re: FAQ question

I suggest reading the FAQ again. On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, at 03:23 PM, Chris Eidem wrote: > I’m attempting to create a multi-domain opensmtpd+dovecot set up. I have > a question about the FAQ example. In it you have the following line in > the config: > > listen on egress port 587

FAQ question

I’m attempting to create a multi-domain opensmtpd+dovecot set up. I have a question about the FAQ example. In it you have the following line in the config: listen on egress port 587 tls-require pki mail.example.com auth and you have the passwd table in the dovecot as follows: j

question about procmail and delimiter

sd Folder: /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda Notice the comsat line where mve@ is passed and not mve+detail@ to dovecot sieve. My question: what kind of command do I have to use in smtpd.conf to pass these values to procmail? I’ve got it working with dovecot-lda directly by using: deliver to mda

Spamd question with Spamtrap

Hello, Spamd has been really efficient in blocking spam. A few of them passed through once in a while but there's no discomfort. But, I'm not able to use spamtrap. #spamdb -T -a ""# spamdb | grep SPAMTRAP SPAMTRAP| But when I telnet port 25 and try

Re: Memiks a new user of opensmtpd and question about rspamd

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:38:54PM +, M??m??ks wrote: > Hello, > Hello, > I am a new user of opensmtpd and I really like it. > Cool > I would like to create a filter to interact with rspamd or a plugin... > Filters are not a thing yet, I'll post a lengthy explanation about plans for

Memiks a new user of opensmtpd and question about rspamd

Hello, I am a new user of opensmtpd and I really like it. I would like to create a filter to interact with rspamd or a plugin... Do you know where I can find some documentation about development of opensmtpd? Thanks a lot, BR, Frédéric LESUR.

Re: question about CentOS 7 and OpenSMTPD-Extras

Hi! There's a very good step by step "recipe" at http://technoquarter.blogspot.ch, including ClamAV and spamassassin (and more). It's very easy to set up - even without filters. Another very good guide can be found at https://frozen-geek.net/openbsd-email-server-1/ Virtual users, mysql? No

Re: question about CentOS 7 and OpenSMTPD-Extras

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:42:27AM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote: > > > On 28 Jul 2016, at 11:01, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:21:04AM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am trying to replace my Postfix + Amavisd-new setup with

question about CentOS 7 and OpenSMTPD-Extras

Hello, I am trying to replace my Postfix + Amavisd-new setup with OpenSMTPD with the OpenSMTPD-Extras setup. I have 2 questions: - I don’t see the clamav, spam assassin, etc filters not anymore, are they now default installed? If not how do I install them? - When trying to compile the

Re: recipient question

Thanks for these two answers! On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, Edgar Pettijohn wrote: > I've used it in the past. The following should work. > accept from any for domain recipient deliver to mbox On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, Gilles Chehade wrote: > You can't name a table after a keyword: > > recipient

Re: recipient question

I've used it in the past. The following should work. table tablename file:/etc/mail/something accept from any for domain recipient deliver to mbox /etc/mail/something u...@something.com On 03/23/16 17:31, Ian Darwin wrote: At this time, the list is very low volume, feel free to introduce

recipient question

> At this time, the list is very low volume, feel free to introduce yourself > ;-) Hola! This is Ian Darwin, sometime OpenBSD committer (ports, mostly, but I also wrote the old file(1) command "a while ago"), Java geek, tech instructor/author, and photographer. I've been running smtpd on my

Re: question to package maintainers

Having OpenSSL and LibreSSL living together on the same system seems reasonable. Surely name conflicts can be worked around somehow? Out of curiosity, does anyone know how many people run OpenSMTP on the offending systems compared to OpenBSD? Cheers, Tim Hume. > On 24 Dec 2015, at 03:06,

Re: question to package maintainers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 07:25:36PM +1100, Tim Hume wrote: > Having OpenSSL and LibreSSL living together on the same system seems > reasonable. Surely name conflicts can be worked around somehow? > That's my point ;-) > Out of curiosity, does anyone know how many people run OpenSMTP on the >

Re: question to package maintainers

ken into account when making the move so that the package maintainer can sort things out but I don't think that it should be a justification to prevent move and limit our progress. If no one in the Fedora community would be willing to work out a solution then it would be an indicator t

Re: question to package maintainers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 09:42:56AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > Out of curiosity, does anyone know how many people run OpenSMTP on > > the offending systems compared to OpenBSD? According to Debian popcon (an opt-in "popularity contest" for packages), there are >= 19 people with opensmtpd

Re: question to package maintainers

> On 24 Dec 2015, at 02:16, Gilles Chehade wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 07:56:25PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: >>> >>> >>> Would your distribution be affected if LibreSSL became a

Re: question to package maintainers

On Dec 24, 2015 7:31 PM, "Gilles Chehade" wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 07:17:12PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote: > > > > Well, you asked what distributions packagers thought, and I presented it > > from point of the specific distribution. There are always some issues, not > >

Re: question to package maintainers

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 07:56:25PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > > Would your distribution be affected if LibreSSL became a requirement ? > > > > OpenSMTPD is starting to rely on LibreSSL-specific functions that

Re: question to package maintainers

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 07:56:02AM -0800, Richard wrote: > On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > What I'm wondering is if there's any reason that would prevent RHEL, for > > example, to package LibreSSL in the same way that libasr was packaged so > > that OpenSMTPD could specifically

Re: question to package maintainers

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > Would your distribution be affected if LibreSSL became a requirement ? > > OpenSMTPD is starting to rely on LibreSSL-specific functions that will > force us to go through painful hacks to maintain that dual SSL support

Re: question to package maintainers

On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Gilles Chehade wrote: > What I'm wondering is if there's any reason that would prevent RHEL, for > example, to package LibreSSL in the same way that libasr was packaged so > that OpenSMTPD could specifically depend on it. > > The system would keep its default SSL library. >

Re: question to package maintainers

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > What I'm wondering is if there's any reason that would prevent RHEL, for > example, to package LibreSSL in the same way that libasr was packaged so > that OpenSMTPD could specifically depend on it. > > The system would

question to package maintainers

Hi, Would your distribution be affected if LibreSSL became a requirement ? OpenSMTPD is starting to rely on LibreSSL-specific functions that will force us to go through painful hacks to maintain that dual SSL support and I'd like to know if switching to a LibreSSL-only mode is an option at this

Re: n00b question

> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 13:38:31 -0400, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > > I have two servers up and running and would like to know how to clean > > out the queue on them. I have a lot of test messages stuck there from > > early attempts to get the configuration right. > > > > Is there an option to do

Re: n00b question

Thanks! Thanks, Bryan On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Joseph Mulloy wrote: > Use smtpctl > > https://www.opensmtpd.org/smtpctl.8.html > > List messages in queue > smtpctl show queue > > To try to flush the queue (Send all messages) > smtpctl schedule all > > To remove

Re: n00b question

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 13:38:31 -0400, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > I have two servers up and running and would like to know how to clean > out the queue on them. I have a lot of test messages stuck there from > early attempts to get the configuration right. > > Is there an option to do this? I

Re: n00b question

Use smtpctl https://www.opensmtpd.org/smtpctl.8.html List messages in queue smtpctl show queue To try to flush the queue (Send all messages) smtpctl schedule all To remove messages use the following with the message ids shown by show queue smtpctl remove $message-id > On Oct 6, 2015, at 1:38

Re: Question

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: OpenSMTPD does not support bad rcpt throttling as a specific mechanism but supports a more generic bad command throttling where a bad command is any command that has not helped moved the session forward. If you accumulate enough

Odp.: Re: Question

Thank you both for quick reply All is clear now Regards --Oryginalna wiadomość-- Od: Peter N. M. Hansteen Nadawca: Peter N. M. Hansteen,,, Do: Gilles Chehade DW: michalzient...@gmail.com DW: misc@opensmtpd.org Temat: Re: Question Wysłano: 19 maj 2015 09:50 On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:10

Question

Hello guys, I have a question, it seems that OpenSMTPD does not support bad rcpt throttling, this is a feature that I am using in sendmail to prevent/limit DoS/DDoS attack and other hacks against smtp. I have found browsing OpenSMTPD code that there is a hardcoded parameter called

question about multiple tagged emails and order of accept tagged filter rules

I know that the filter rules are applied in order and first match decides what action is taken. My question is in regards to tagging emails (like with using CLAM_IN and SPAM_IN proxies etc)... Does an email hold more than one tag? Or does a newer tag replace an older one? If it holds more than

Re: Question about auth and auth-optional

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 06:12:13PM +0200, Norman Golisz wrote: Hi, [...] And about ancient mua, I will follow the rule if this does't work with opensmtpd I will not use it :) At least when it comes to security-related stuff. Otherwise, if you think there's a useful feature OpenSMTPD

Question about auth and auth-optional

, yandex and everything else. So, I think auth-optional is the only choise for most of servers, am i right? I'm very happy using OpenSMTPD! This is the best MTA ever! Could you help me with one more question, please. Will OpenSMTPD ever support non-tls PLAIN login auth mechanism? For me

datalen mismatch with opensmtpd-201405121706 and permissions question

Hi Having got the snapshot to compile on OpenBSD5.5-stable I tried it out. I get datalen errors when I try to send mail to it. Any clues? Everything works OK on 5.4.2. (run output below) As a probably separate question, what permissions should there be on /var/spool/smtpd/*? I had to create

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Tue, October 22, 2013 3:41 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:53:55PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: Hello, Ohai, I am using OpenSMTPD 5.3.3p1 portable release on Ubuntu 64 bit. I am trying to set up Clamav with OpenSMTPD following:

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Wed, October 23, 2013 7:47 am, Michiel van Es wrote: On Wed, October 23, 2013 7:42 am, Michiel van Es wrote: On Tue, October 22, 2013 3:41 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 01:53:55PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: Hello, Ohai, I am using OpenSMTPD 5.3.3p1 portable

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:17:06PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: is it possible that clamsmtp (a clam proxy for smtp - mostly used by Postfix) is not working accepting the connection? I see it should be possible with clamav when reading

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Wed, October 23, 2013 12:50 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 07:42:41AM -, Michiel van Es wrote: The config would be like this then right? listen on lo listen on eth0 tls certificate mail.pragmasec.nl auth-optional hostname mail.pragmasec.nl listen on eth0 port 587

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Wed, October 23, 2013 12:56 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:17:06PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: is it possible that clamsmtp (a clam proxy for smtp - mostly used by Postfix) is not working accepting the connection? I see it should be possible with clamav when reading

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:03:32PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: I have it working. For people who want to use this: 1) install clamsmtp - it is a clam smtp proxy which accepts incoming and then outgoing connections (putting a message back in the queue) 2) use something similar as setup

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:40:40PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: On Wed, October 23, 2013 1:12 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:03:32PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: I have it working. For people who want to use this: 1) install clamsmtp - it is a clam smtp proxy

Re: question about OpenSMTP and Clam

On Wed, October 23, 2013 1:48 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:40:40PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: On Wed, October 23, 2013 1:12 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:03:32PM -, Michiel van Es wrote: I have it working. For people who want to use

  1   2   >