Re: RE: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

[Eswar]

You can get the product ids of these different lync versions using sccm (simple 
query on v_add_remove_programs will do this) and then create batch/cmd to pipe 
all the product codes Into the script. 
Script try to perform the uninstallstion on clients that has specific product 
code exist. 
Msiexec /X productid /q /norestart 
Adjust the parameters for msiexec accordingly. 
--
Regards, 
Eswar Koneti 
www.eskonr.com
Sent from Mobile Device, please excuse any typo's as a result.  Tuesday, 18 
October 2016, 04:53AM +08:00 from Matthew Varnado  
matthew.varn...@exeterfinance.com :

>Simple shell script solution (untested with this product, but works for other 
>products regularly)
> 
>wmic product where ‘name like “%%Live Meeting%%”’ call uninstall /nointeractive
> 
>note the single quotes around the logic phrase, and the double quotes around 
>the search string.  Double % are used for the wildcards because if you do 
>single
 % it tries to find a variable by that name.
> 
>This also assumes only a single version would be installed at a time.  Run 
>multiple times for multiple installs (if possible), or work out a FOR loop to 
>execute
 the command for each match found.
> 
>Another option (requiring a lot more research) is to find all the PIDS and do 
>a series of msiexec /x[PID] /qn commands.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>Matt Varnado |
> 
>From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
>On Behalf Of  Brian McDonald
>Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:27 PM
>To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
>Subject: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall
> 
>Hello,
> 
>Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of 
>Microsoft Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different 
>versions of Live Meeting. Since the installers are
 all MSI based, I was hoping there would be an easy way to script/automate the 
uninstall so I would only require 1 single package to get the job done in SCCM.
> 
>When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:
> 
>8.0.6362.187
>8.0.6362.202
>8.0.6362.215
>8.0.6362.223
>8.0.6362.229
>8.0.6362.239
>8.0.6362.249
>8.0.6362.254
>8.0.6362.259
> 
>What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
>don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
>insight on to a recommended approach?
> 
>Thanks,
>Brian
> 
>--
>Confidentiality Warning:  This transmission is intended only for the proper 
>recipient and may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged. 
>If you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, (A) 
>you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution
 or copying of this message is strictly prohibited, (B) please notify the 
sender at either the e-mail address or telephone number above, and (C) delete 
this email from your computer. Thank you.

[mssms] Re: Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded

[RJ Subscriber]

We see that KB915597 from 10/13 hanging around, too, with a newer KB2267602.  I 
haven't been able to locate info on how the two updates work together but from 
their behavior they seem to be different "definition updates" on different 
update tracks.  The updates are always KB915597 or KB2267602, but I can't find 
any documentation on what one does over the other.


-Russell


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com  on behalf 
of Murray, Mike 
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 4:19 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded


Well, for now I'm going to set my ADR to only include updates from the last 1 
day. Maybe that will help.



[cid:image002.png@01D22892.2B6F0CC0]



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded



This should read "My Endpoints are NOT getting updated this morning..."



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 10:16 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded



My Endpoints are getting updated this morning. When I checked the update 
package, I see an update from 10/13 that has not been superseded. There are 
newer updates, so I'm not sure why this one is still there?



[cid:image003.png@01D22892.2B6F0CC0]





Best Regards,



Mike Murray

Desktop Engineer/IT Consultant - IT Support Services

California State University, Chico

530.898.4357
mmur...@csuchico.edu



Remember, Chico State will NEVER ask you for your password via email!

For more information about recognizing phishing scam emails go to: 
http://www.csuchico.edu/isec/basics/spam-and-phishing.shtml

[mssms] Re: Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

[RJ Subscriber]

The problem we've seen is matching the PC's USB port with the right drive.  
Older PCs with USB 2.0 ports often won't boot to the USB 3.0 drive, so we've 
had to keep a few USB 2.0 drives around until those machines are finally 
replaced.  Newer PCs will use either USBs with no issues other than speed to 
copy down the boot files.


Russell


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com  on behalf 
of Chris Carbone 
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:15 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD


Hello All,



I would like to entertain the idea again of using USB for imaging. In the past 
we were using the Kingston Traveler USB 3.0 drives and I recently read that 
these are known to have issues with imaging. I did not know this and always 
wondered why imaging would sometimes flake out for us.



Does anyone use USB 2.0 drives that you have used for a while that are 
consistently working with OSD?

Thanks!



Chris









This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.

[mssms] Missing scan with SCEP context menu after SCEP update

[Corkill, Daniel]

We currently run SCEP 4.7 (little behind) and this month are pushing out the 
latest SCEP client update (4.10). What we're seeing on machines that get this 
new version is they're missing the context menu item to 'Scan with Endpoint 
Protection' that was previously available when selecting a folder/file.

Anyone else seen this?

Daniel.
*
This email, including any attachment, is confidential to the intended 
recipient.  It may also be privileged and may be subject to copyright.  If you 
have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete all copies of the email.  Any confidentiality or privilege is not 
waived.  Neither the Council nor the sender warrant that this email does not 
contain any viruses or other unsolicited items.

This email is an informal Council communication.  The Council only accepts 
responsibility for information sent under official letterhead and duly signed 
by, or on behalf of, the Chief Executive Officer.

Privacy Collection Notice
Logan City Council may collect your personal information e.g. name, residential 
address, phone number etc, in order to conduct its business and/or meet its 
statutory obligations.  The information may be accessed by and/or transferred 
to business partners, contractors, employees and/or Councillors of Logan City 
Council and other government agencies for Council business related activities.  
Your information will be handled in accordance with the Information Privacy Act 
2009 (Qld) and may be released to other parties where we are required or 
authorised by law to do so.

[mssms] RE: Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded

[Murray, Mike]

Well, for now I'm going to set my ADR to only include updates from the last
1 day. Maybe that will help.

 



 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Old Windows Defender update not being marked as
superseded

 

This should read "My Endpoints are NOT getting updated this morning."

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 10:16 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com  
Subject: [mssms] Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded

 

My Endpoints are getting updated this morning. When I checked the update
package, I see an update from 10/13 that has not been superseded. There are
newer updates, so I'm not sure why this one is still there?

 



 

 

Best Regards,

 

Mike Murray

Desktop Engineer/IT Consultant - IT Support Services

California State University, Chico

530.898.4357
  mmur...@csuchico.edu

 

Remember, Chico State will NEVER ask you for your password via email!  

For more information about recognizing phishing scam emails go to:
http://www.csuchico.edu/isec/basics/spam-and-phishing.shtml

 

 

 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Wolf, Daniel]

I apologize to the MDT team for spreading misinformation about your work at 
Microsoft. Please accept my apologies.

Daniel Wolf

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Aaron Czechowski
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:58 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management 
tool

"publicly state their dedication"

See 
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/msdeployment/2015/12/22/mdt-2013-update-2-now-available/


Q: Is this the last release of MDT?

No, we will continue to iterate and invest in the product.

I'm the PM for MDT (among other things), and seem to be asked a variation of 
question every couple of months.

MDT is not going away; our current plan includes continued investment. Not at 
the same level as SCCM (MDT is free, SCCM is licensed, so level of investment 
will follow accordingly), but we do continue to work on it. In fact, you'll see 
an update (mostly bug fix) to it coming soon.

Aaron


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Wolf, Daniel
Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 10:48
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management 
tool

Thank you for making this Daniel.

>From what I've heard in rumors, it sounds like Microsoft does not really 
>dedicate resources to MDT.

I'd like them to publicly state their dedication to this tool, its team, and 
layout a roadmap or vision for us as Windows administrators going forward.

I spent years of my life lost in the forest because MDT didn't seem like it was 
Microsoft's go-to place for solving my problems. I've learned, and I've gone 
through the pain of implementing it with our specific requirements, but it 
would have been encouraging to see it enhanced further.

Daniel Wolf

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

RE: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

[Jason Sandys]

As noted in my blog post, please, please do not do this. The links are in my 
blog post on why, but in short, Win32_Product is evil.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Matthew Varnado
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 3:54 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

Simple shell script solution (untested with this product, but works for other 
products regularly)

wmic product where 'name like "%%Live Meeting%%"' call uninstall /nointeractive

note the single quotes around the logic phrase, and the double quotes around 
the search string.  Double % are used for the wildcards because if you do 
single % it tries to find a variable by that name.

This also assumes only a single version would be installed at a time.  Run 
multiple times for multiple installs (if possible), or work out a FOR loop to 
execute the command for each match found.

Another option (requiring a lot more research) is to find all the PIDS and do a 
series of msiexec /x[PID] /qn commands.




Matt Varnado |

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:27 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall


Hello,



Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.



When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259



What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?



Thanks,

Brian


Confidentiality Warning: This transmission is intended only for the proper 
recipient and may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged. 
If you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, (A) 
you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited, (B) please notify the sender at either the 
e-mail address or telephone number above, and (C) delete this email from your 
computer. Thank you.

Re: [mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

[Eric Groff]

Check the registry to get the product cod and run this command for each that is 
installed:
msiexec.exe /x {product code} /qn

On Oct 17, 2016 2:27 PM, Brian McDonald  wrote:

Hello,


Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.


When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259


What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?


Thanks,

Brian

[mssms] RE: Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

[Murray, Mike]

The majority of our area techs use PXE as well. And our folks rely on PXE
when imaging multiple machines at once. But for onesy-twosey, I like the USB
boot, it’s faster.  J

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:31 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

 

I meet a lot of USB deployers in my field, naturally, since we sell PXE
software. The common view is that it’s a royal mess.

 

So go with any ol’ PXE instead! Will save you a ton of headaches and less
frustrated deployment techies.

 

//A

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: den 17 oktober 2016 13:19
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com  
Subject: [mssms] RE: Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

 

Honestly we have a mixed bag of USB keys and they all work fine. Are you
talking about standalone imaging or just putting the boot image on it?
Either way, we use a wide variety.

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:16 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'  >
Subject: [mssms] Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

 

Hello All,

 

I would like to entertain the idea again of using USB for imaging. In the
past we were using the Kingston Traveler USB 3.0 drives and I recently read
that these are known to have issues with imaging. I did not know this and
always wondered why imaging would sometimes flake out for us. 

 

Does anyone use USB 2.0 drives that you have used for a while that are
consistently working with OSD?


Thanks!

 

Chris

 

 

 

 

This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on
the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone
immediately. 

 

 

 






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [mssms] RE: Live Meeting Uninstall

[Erik Wold]

Be careful when querying win32_product:

https://gregramsey.net/2012/02/20/win32_product-is-evil/

Mvh
Erik




On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:23 PM +0200, "Kelkar, Bhushan" 
> wrote:

Try below script.


$a = Get-WmiObject -Class win32_product | where {$_.Name -like "app display 
name"}
$a.Uninstall()

This works regardless of the software version if the display name is entered 
properly. :)

Bhushan Kelkar | Expert Systems Engineer – MIS/IT Services
Allscripts | EON Free Zone | Kharadi | Pune, Maharashtra | India 411014
+91 2071 078404| O
+91 9545 240543| M
bhushan.kel...@allscripts.com | 
www.allscripts.com
Corporate Headquarters l 222 Merchandise Mart Plaza l 20th Floor l Chicago, IL 
l 60654 l USA

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 3:27 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall


Hello,



Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.



When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259



What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?



Thanks,

Brian

RE: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

[Matthew Varnado]

Simple shell script solution (untested with this product, but works for other 
products regularly)

wmic product where 'name like "%%Live Meeting%%"' call uninstall /nointeractive

note the single quotes around the logic phrase, and the double quotes around 
the search string.  Double % are used for the wildcards because if you do 
single % it tries to find a variable by that name.

This also assumes only a single version would be installed at a time.  Run 
multiple times for multiple installs (if possible), or work out a FOR loop to 
execute the command for each match found.

Another option (requiring a lot more research) is to find all the PIDS and do a 
series of msiexec /x[PID] /qn commands.




Matt Varnado |

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:27 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall


Hello,



Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.



When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259



What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?



Thanks,

Brian


Confidentiality Warning: This transmission is intended only for the proper 
recipient and may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged. 
If you received this message in error or are not the intended recipient, (A) 
you are hereby notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
message is strictly prohibited, (B) please notify the sender at either the 
e-mail address or telephone number above, and (C) delete this email from your 
computer. Thank you.

RE: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

[Jason Sandys]

Updating it is different now since they started releasing updated WUA versions 
as actual KBs.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:42 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

There’s always been that catch 22. You can’t update the windows updates agent 
with windows updates disabled but if you don’t disable it you get random popups 
and unexpected reboots.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

[External Email]
to be able to deploy the client using WSUS.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Jason Sandys 
> wrote:
What choice do they have? Either they get pop ups like this or they disable 
auto updates. Why would anyone leave auto updates enabled?

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 1:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

Thanks.  Both of the machines in question were set to Automatically update.  
But, they didn’t have the updates I pushed until a couple of days ago.  That’s 
odd.  I’ll see if the powers that be will allow me to push the disablement of 
Automatic Updates.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

That’s the default Windows Update notification for reboots. Do you have 
‘Automatic Updates’ disabled via GPO? Maybe check RSOP.msc or gpedit.msc on 
this machine to confirm its getting the proper settings.

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 1:01 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
>
Subject: [mssms] Strange popup

I use SCCM for patching.  Typically, we get the normal SCCM popup for reminder 
of reboot.  I had a user this morning that got that popup, but they got another 
one as well, and I have no idea why he would have gotten it.

[cid:image001.png@01D22886.D56A2E00]


The dropdown allows you to delay and get a reminder in up to 4 hours.  Anyone 
know why this would pop up, in addition to the normal Software Center 
notification?

Joe Heaton
Information Technology Operations Branch
Data and Technology Division
CA Department of Fish and Wildlife
1700 9th Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA  95811
Desk:  (916) 323-1284

Every Californian should conserve water.  Find out how at:
[SaveOurWater_Logo]
SaveOurWater.com · 
Drought.CA.gov



The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.








Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

[mssms] Re: Live Meeting Uninstall

[Brian McDonald]

Sandys,


This is awesome. Is it possible for me to leverage the below details with your 
script?


8.0.6362.187-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQAJUFph26QohAg4AuqGQmbJU%3D=fm4_uqgpgkKFMTiETe7gmgAIFhDP9tMYuByP9IXumnrfumcd208CSHtBu5S9OK_cpeJ7EmUE0Lc.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.202-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQAIUz8lrA%2Bi5Hvj6x075QoOY%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.215-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQACTqQEIvNLdAv5AnIHriUmY%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.223-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQAFjZdrvpBrBEkpNq%2BbZPi6M%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.229-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQAJKk1X8BNfpOnFeBMe7rqH0%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.239-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQAKZzMAUu0HtHixZajVY0z40%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.249-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQADiQZQTToFhOqCuiqoye34Q%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.254-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQAKgVc6hqO%2BtGlyxq3Y17KaA%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]



8.0.6362.259-[https://attachment.outlook.office.net/owa/deployment...@live.com/service.svc/s/GetFileAttachment?id=AQMkADAwATM3ZmYAZS04ZDcxLTkwZDUtMDACLTAwCgBGAAADRxYqvrLdC0GdWnbivowPSAcAOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKogEMOY12i%2F16f02J2X4xU1SKoBrdCTABEgAQAJqaAIpg9zreRbwTf3t7AGlpANA%3D=z7ATGH_h2kq43KUhwWKSCqBcqQDP9tMY1-GpZ1iLcjMxbFd3xY3XGLEscM2Ez8PCPIPQ_47Rl_U.=21a36a5c-79f0-436d-8278-111d890fe5e3=outlook.live.com=1]


These are the GUIDS/Product IDs for each LM version.


Thanks,

Brian


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com  on behalf 
of Kelkar, Bhushan 
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:38:00 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Live Meeting Uninstall

Try below script.


$a = Get-WmiObject -Class win32_product | where {$_.Name -like "app display 
name"}
$a.Uninstall()

This works regardless of the software version if the display name is entered 
properly. :)

Bhushan Kelkar | Expert Systems Engineer - MIS/IT Services
Allscripts | EON Free Zone | Kharadi | Pune, Maharashtra | India 411014
+91 2071 078404| O
+91 9545 240543| M
bhushan.kel...@allscripts.com | 
www.allscripts.com
Corporate Headquarters l 222 Merchandise Mart Plaza l 20th Floor l Chicago, IL 
l 60654 l USA

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 

RE: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Andreas Hammarskjöld]

Nano shouldn’t be deployed IMHO, it should be just be booted, then thrown away.

Or how are you guys planning to patch it? Tihi…

//A

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: den 17 oktober 2016 15:26
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image 
management tool

I already hacked together a way to deploy Nano Server with SCCM!  
http://www.ephingadmin.com/deploy-nano-server-sccm-task-sequence/

I've never really gotten into MDT, so lack of MDT support is fine. Do you guys 
really expect people to have to learn MDT before they can deploy Nano server? 
If the next version of SCCM required people to learn PowerShell DSC to install 
it, that would discourage people from using it and kill adoption rates. 
Microsoft probably just slapped some PowerShell cmdlets on top of their already 
created method of deploying these WIMs when they were developing Nano. They 
then slapped a UI on those cmdlets for people who aren't as great with 
PowerShell.


I doubt Microsoft would pick MDT if they were going to invest in a single image 
management solution. It'd be SCCM.



On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:35 PM Garth Jones 
> wrote:
Done and Tweeted!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 12:54 PM

To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

[mssms] RE: Live Meeting Uninstall

[Jason Sandys]

This should work for you: 
http://blog.configmgrftw.com/uninstall-software-en-masse/

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:27 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall


Hello,



Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.



When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259



What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?



Thanks,

Brian

[mssms] RE: Live Meeting Uninstall

[Kelkar, Bhushan]

Try below script.


$a = Get-WmiObject -Class win32_product | where {$_.Name -like "app display 
name"}
$a.Uninstall()

This works regardless of the software version if the display name is entered 
properly. :)

Bhushan Kelkar | Expert Systems Engineer - MIS/IT Services
Allscripts | EON Free Zone | Kharadi | Pune, Maharashtra | India 411014
+91 2071 078404| O
+91 9545 240543| M
bhushan.kel...@allscripts.com | 
www.allscripts.com
Corporate Headquarters l 222 Merchandise Mart Plaza l 20th Floor l Chicago, IL 
l 60654 l USA

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 3:27 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall


Hello,



Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.



When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259



What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?



Thanks,

Brian

Re: [mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

[Erik Wold]

Maybe Jason Sandys exellent tool could do the job:

http://blog.configmgrftw.com/uninstall-software-en-masse/


Mvh
Erik




On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:35 PM +0200, "Brian McDonald" 
> wrote:


Hello,


Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.


When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259


What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?


Thanks,

Brian

[mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Michael Niehaus]

We are publicly dedicated to this tool and it's team :)

-MTN

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Wolf, Daniel
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:48 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management 
tool

Thank you for making this Daniel.

>From what I've heard in rumors, it sounds like Microsoft does not really 
>dedicate resources to MDT.

I'd like them to publicly state their dedication to this tool, its team, and 
layout a roadmap or vision for us as Windows administrators going forward.

I spent years of my life lost in the forest because MDT didn't seem like it was 
Microsoft's go-to place for solving my problems. I've learned, and I've gone 
through the pain of implementing it with our specific requirements, but it 
would have been encouraging to see it enhanced further.

Daniel Wolf

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

[mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Aaron Czechowski]

"publicly state their dedication"

See 
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/msdeployment/2015/12/22/mdt-2013-update-2-now-available/


Q: Is this the last release of MDT?

No, we will continue to iterate and invest in the product.

I'm the PM for MDT (among other things), and seem to be asked a variation of 
question every couple of months.

MDT is not going away; our current plan includes continued investment. Not at 
the same level as SCCM (MDT is free, SCCM is licensed, so level of investment 
will follow accordingly), but we do continue to work on it. In fact, you'll see 
an update (mostly bug fix) to it coming soon.

Aaron


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Wolf, Daniel
Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 10:48
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management 
tool

Thank you for making this Daniel.

>From what I've heard in rumors, it sounds like Microsoft does not really 
>dedicate resources to MDT.

I'd like them to publicly state their dedication to this tool, its team, and 
layout a roadmap or vision for us as Windows administrators going forward.

I spent years of my life lost in the forest because MDT didn't seem like it was 
Microsoft's go-to place for solving my problems. I've learned, and I've gone 
through the pain of implementing it with our specific requirements, but it 
would have been encouraging to see it enhanced further.

Daniel Wolf

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

[mssms] RE: Windows Firewall Remote Desktop oddity

[Mote, Todd]

Yea, I ended up there when I was explaining this to a colleague.  It's not so 
much that most lenient wins, it just happens that one rule is more lenient than 
the others.  They all get applied because they have different sources and 
different conditions around what's logically in my head the same thing, 
restricting access to RDP.  RDP is implemented differently between the editions 
so the rules have to be different, e.g. the "Program" entry.  When I applied 
the 2012+ rules to a 2008 R2 machine, for example, RDP didn't work, because 
svchost.exe on 2008 R2 doesn't answer on 3389, "system" does.

Turns out there's more than one service firewall rule like this.  I got tipped 
off to this because on the 2008 R2 server itself the rule name and group look 
something like "@FirewallAPI.dll,-28778" because the firewall api can't 
understand what it's being told by the newer policy.

I've got a mess to untangle for sure...

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:49 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Windows Firewall Remote Desktop oddity

> Also, when conflicting rules are applied, most lenient wins.

Allow rules can't conflict so this is not accurate. Both rules win, both are 
applied, and both have a slightly different meaning. All allow rules are simply 
combined together like one big happy OR statement.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mote, Todd
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 12:55 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Windows Firewall Remote Desktop oddity

So in cleaning up some OUs, rearranging and generally redoing some GPOs I came 
across this little gem.

In 2008 and 2008 R2, the built in remote desktop firewall rules are written 
like this:

[cid:image001.png@01D22884.C3998CE0]

In 2012, 2012 R2, and 2016, the default rules are written like this:

[cid:image002.png@01D22884.C3998CE0]

Note the biggest difference is that there are now three rules, and the Program 
changed from "System" to actual executables, svchost.exe and rdpsa.exe.

Found out today that a policy written on 2012 and up does not work when applied 
to 2008 R2 and down, despite both being "Advanced Firewall" rules.

I couldn't find anything specific about this on the interwebs, heck I'm not 
even sure this list is appropriate, but there it is.  Also, when conflicting 
rules are applied, most lenient wins.  We've found a bunch of 2008 + that still 
have a 2003 firewall policy applied using the old xp/2003 registry style rules 
allowing '*', because things were easier back then, along with later, tighter 
scoped advanced firewall policies, and rdp still works from places it 
shouldn't, or we didn't intend it to anyway.  it turns out windows firewall has 
turned into kind of a mess over time...

And yes, at the moment, I have to manage it at the host...

Todd

[mssms] RE: Windows Firewall Remote Desktop oddity

[Jason Sandys]

> Also, when conflicting rules are applied, most lenient wins.

Allow rules can't conflict so this is not accurate. Both rules win, both are 
applied, and both have a slightly different meaning. All allow rules are simply 
combined together like one big happy OR statement.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Mote, Todd
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 12:55 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Windows Firewall Remote Desktop oddity

So in cleaning up some OUs, rearranging and generally redoing some GPOs I came 
across this little gem.

In 2008 and 2008 R2, the built in remote desktop firewall rules are written 
like this:

[cid:image001.png@01D2287D.296E6750]

In 2012, 2012 R2, and 2016, the default rules are written like this:

[cid:image002.png@01D2287D.296E6750]

Note the biggest difference is that there are now three rules, and the Program 
changed from "System" to actual executables, svchost.exe and rdpsa.exe.

Found out today that a policy written on 2012 and up does not work when applied 
to 2008 R2 and down, despite both being "Advanced Firewall" rules.

I couldn't find anything specific about this on the interwebs, heck I'm not 
even sure this list is appropriate, but there it is.  Also, when conflicting 
rules are applied, most lenient wins.  We've found a bunch of 2008 + that still 
have a 2003 firewall policy applied using the old xp/2003 registry style rules 
allowing '*', because things were easier back then, along with later, tighter 
scoped advanced firewall policies, and rdp still works from places it 
shouldn't, or we didn't intend it to anyway.  it turns out windows firewall has 
turned into kind of a mess over time...

And yes, at the moment, I have to manage it at the host...

Todd

[mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

[Brian McDonald]

Hello,


Does anyone have a method or process for uninstalling ALL versions of Microsoft 
Live Meeting. In my environment we have approximately 9 different versions of 
Live Meeting. Since the installers are all MSI based, I was hoping there would 
be an easy way to script/automate the uninstall so I would only require 1 
single package to get the job done in SCCM.


When I say multiple versions, here is what I mean:


8.0.6362.187

8.0.6362.202

8.0.6362.215

8.0.6362.223

8.0.6362.229

8.0.6362.239

8.0.6362.249

8.0.6362.254

8.0.6362.259


What would be the best way to package an uninstall script to tackle this? I 
don't want to have multiple MSI uninstall packages. Can someone provide some 
insight on to a recommended approach?


Thanks,

Brian

Re: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Ryan]

I already hacked together a way to deploy Nano Server with SCCM!
http://www.ephingadmin.com/deploy-nano-server-sccm-task-sequence/

I've never really gotten into MDT, so lack of MDT support is fine. Do you
guys really expect people to have to learn MDT before they can deploy Nano
server? If the next version of SCCM required people to learn PowerShell DSC
to install it, that would discourage people from using it and kill adoption
rates. Microsoft probably just slapped some PowerShell cmdlets on top of
their already created method of deploying these WIMs when they were
developing Nano. They then slapped a UI on those cmdlets for people who
aren't as great with PowerShell.


I doubt Microsoft would pick MDT if they were going to invest in a single
image management solution. It'd be SCCM.



On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:35 PM Garth Jones  wrote:

Done and Tweeted!



*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Ratliff

*Sent:* Monday, October 17, 2016 12:54 PM


*To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
*Subject:* [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image
management tool



https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink



We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If
you do to, please consider signing.



*Daniel Ratliff*




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

RE: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

[Jason Sandys]

Much better ways to deploy the client agent IMO, but, let’s rephrase the 
question because this is valid:

Why would anyone leave auto updates enabled after the ConfigMgr client agent is 
deployed and successfully managing a system?

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

to be able to deploy the client using WSUS.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Jason Sandys 
> wrote:
What choice do they have? Either they get pop ups like this or they disable 
auto updates. Why would anyone leave auto updates enabled?

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 1:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

Thanks.  Both of the machines in question were set to Automatically update.  
But, they didn’t have the updates I pushed until a couple of days ago.  That’s 
odd.  I’ll see if the powers that be will allow me to push the disablement of 
Automatic Updates.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

That’s the default Windows Update notification for reboots. Do you have 
‘Automatic Updates’ disabled via GPO? Maybe check RSOP.msc or gpedit.msc on 
this machine to confirm its getting the proper settings.

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 1:01 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
>
Subject: [mssms] Strange popup

I use SCCM for patching.  Typically, we get the normal SCCM popup for reminder 
of reboot.  I had a user this morning that got that popup, but they got another 
one as well, and I have no idea why he would have gotten it.

[cid:image001.png@01D2287C.59DD3250]


The dropdown allows you to delay and get a reminder in up to 4 hours.  Anyone 
know why this would pop up, in addition to the normal Software Center 
notification?

Joe Heaton
Information Technology Operations Branch
Data and Technology Division
CA Department of Fish and Wildlife
1700 9th Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA  95811
Desk:  (916) 323-1284

Every Californian should conserve water.  Find out how at:
[SaveOurWater_Logo]
SaveOurWater.com · 
Drought.CA.gov



The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

RE: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[Marcum, John]

Actually it wasn’t Wally who did it. Wally said in the session it was his first 
time seeing it too. ☺

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Harjit Dhaliwal
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

Wally Mead did a demo of Cireson’s web console at IT/Dev Connections last week. 
If I’m not mistaken, it’ll be made available in November.

-Harjit

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:16 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

Cireson did? I don't see it on their site.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:38 AM Marcum, John 
> wrote:
Cierson announced a web front end last week. It's not free but they do have 
some free tools that may do what you need.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:48 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[External Email]

Hi

We use http://softwarecentral.com/ for our ServiceDesk and Desktop Technician 
for their daily use. Advanced stuff is done in the console.

rg
Richard

On 11-10-2016 18:50, S ConfigMgr wrote:
> We are running SCCM 1606 , looking for web based solution so that we
> can replace sccm console and offer as a web service. ?
>
> is this possible ?
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> ED




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

RE: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

[Marcum, John]

There’s always been that catch 22. You can’t update the windows updates agent 
with windows updates disabled but if you don’t disable it you get random popups 
and unexpected reboots.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:21 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

[External Email]
to be able to deploy the client using WSUS.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Jason Sandys 
> wrote:
What choice do they have? Either they get pop ups like this or they disable 
auto updates. Why would anyone leave auto updates enabled?

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 1:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

Thanks.  Both of the machines in question were set to Automatically update.  
But, they didn’t have the updates I pushed until a couple of days ago.  That’s 
odd.  I’ll see if the powers that be will allow me to push the disablement of 
Automatic Updates.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 10:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

That’s the default Windows Update notification for reboots. Do you have 
‘Automatic Updates’ disabled via GPO? Maybe check RSOP.msc or gpedit.msc on 
this machine to confirm its getting the proper settings.

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 1:01 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
>
Subject: [mssms] Strange popup

I use SCCM for patching.  Typically, we get the normal SCCM popup for reminder 
of reboot.  I had a user this morning that got that popup, but they got another 
one as well, and I have no idea why he would have gotten it.

[cid:image001.png@01D2287C.3A905940]


The dropdown allows you to delay and get a reminder in up to 4 hours.  Anyone 
know why this would pop up, in addition to the normal Software Center 
notification?

Joe Heaton
Information Technology Operations Branch
Data and Technology Division
CA Department of Fish and Wildlife
1700 9th Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA  95811
Desk:  (916) 323-1284

Every Californian should conserve water.  Find out how at:
[SaveOurWater_Logo]
SaveOurWater.com · 
Drought.CA.gov



The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.









Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

[mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Marcum, John]

My 2 cents… I didn’t sign it because of the reasons you bring up below.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Aaron Czechowski
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 12:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management 
tool

[External Email]
Ok…I’ll bite. ☺
I get what you’re saying, and I’m really interested to see how this petition 
progresses, but my personal opinion is that this is like asking Stanley to 
standardize on how to join together building materials. Do I use a hammer and 
nail, nailgun, screwdriver and screw (Phillips or flathead or Torx), screw gun 
and screw, staples, or glue/epoxy? They all achieve the same end goal, but they 
are different tools for different circumstances, and you should use the right 
tool for the right job.

A few specific comments. As ya’ll know, we’re working on more clearly 
differentiating MDT and SCCM – that won’t happen overnight, but it’s on our 
roadmap.

Windows has already deprecated the imaging component of ICD: see the note at 
the top of 
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn916113(v=vs.85).aspx.

Does anyone really use WDS for image management? Or just the Windows PXE server?

As for the others…heard. I assume NSIB is what probably pushed you over the 
edge? I wish we had a better story for Nano Server in SCCM, but without the 
ability to install the client, or manage via MDM, there’s not much value in 
hacking together some deployment story if the long-term management does not 
exist. That’s a bigger discussion we’re having with the server team.

Aaron


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 09:54
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.






Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

[mssms] RE: Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

[Andreas Hammarskjöld]

I meet a lot of USB deployers in my field, naturally, since we sell PXE 
software. The common view is that it's a royal mess.

So go with any ol' PXE instead! Will save you a ton of headaches and less 
frustrated deployment techies.

//A

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: den 17 oktober 2016 13:19
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

Honestly we have a mixed bag of USB keys and they all work fine. Are you 
talking about standalone imaging or just putting the boot image on it? Either 
way, we use a wide variety.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:16 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
>
Subject: [mssms] Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

Hello All,

I would like to entertain the idea again of using USB for imaging. In the past 
we were using the Kingston Traveler USB 3.0 drives and I recently read that 
these are known to have issues with imaging. I did not know this and always 
wondered why imaging would sometimes flake out for us.

Does anyone use USB 2.0 drives that you have used for a while that are 
consistently working with OSD?

Thanks!

Chris




This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.

RE: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[Marcum, John]

It’s not available yet but they talked about it at IT/Dev connections.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 1:16 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

Cireson did? I don't see it on their site.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:38 AM Marcum, John 
> wrote:
Cierson announced a web front end last week. It's not free but they do have 
some free tools that may do what you need.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:48 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[External Email]

Hi

We use http://softwarecentral.com/ for our ServiceDesk and Desktop Technician 
for their daily use. Advanced stuff is done in the console.

rg
Richard

On 11-10-2016 18:50, S ConfigMgr wrote:
> We are running SCCM 1606 , looking for web based solution so that we
> can replace sccm console and offer as a web service. ?
>
> is this possible ?
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> ED




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

[mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Garth Jones]

Done and Tweeted!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 12:54 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

RE: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[Harjit Dhaliwal]

Wally Mead did a demo of Cireson’s web console at IT/Dev Connections last week. 
If I’m not mistaken, it’ll be made available in November.

-Harjit

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 2:16 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

Cireson did? I don't see it on their site.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:38 AM Marcum, John 
> wrote:
Cierson announced a web front end last week. It's not free but they do have 
some free tools that may do what you need.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:48 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[External Email]

Hi

We use http://softwarecentral.com/ for our ServiceDesk and Desktop Technician 
for their daily use. Advanced stuff is done in the console.

rg
Richard

On 11-10-2016 18:50, S ConfigMgr wrote:
> We are running SCCM 1606 , looking for web based solution so that we
> can replace sccm console and offer as a web service. ?
>
> is this possible ?
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> ED




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

[mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Wolf, Daniel]

Thank you for making this Daniel.

>From what I've heard in rumors, it sounds like Microsoft does not really 
>dedicate resources to MDT.

I'd like them to publicly state their dedication to this tool, its team, and 
layout a roadmap or vision for us as Windows administrators going forward.

I spent years of my life lost in the forest because MDT didn't seem like it was 
Microsoft's go-to place for solving my problems. I've learned, and I've gone 
through the pain of implementing it with our specific requirements, but it 
would have been encouraging to see it enhanced further.

Daniel Wolf

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 11:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

Re: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

[Todd Hemsell]

to be able to deploy the client using WSUS.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Jason Sandys  wrote:

> What choice do they have? Either they get pop ups like this or they
> disable auto updates. Why would anyone leave auto updates enabled?
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
> *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 1:08 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Strange popup
>
>
>
> Thanks.  Both of the machines in question were set to Automatically
> update.  But, they didn’t have the updates I pushed until a couple of days
> ago.  That’s odd.  I’ll see if the powers that be will allow me to push the
> disablement of Automatic Updates.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com ] *On Behalf Of *Daniel
> Ratliff
> *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 10:12 AM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* [mssms] RE: Strange popup
>
>
>
> That’s the default Windows Update notification for reboots. Do you have
> ‘Automatic Updates’ disabled via GPO? Maybe check RSOP.msc or gpedit.msc on
> this machine to confirm its getting the proper settings.
>
>
>
> *Daniel Ratliff*
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists.
> myitforum.com ] *On Behalf Of *Heaton,
> Joseph@Wildlife
> *Sent:* Friday, October 14, 2016 1:01 PM
> *To:* 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
> *Subject:* [mssms] Strange popup
>
>
>
> I use SCCM for patching.  Typically, we get the normal SCCM popup for
> reminder of reboot.  I had a user this morning that got that popup, but
> they got another one as well, and I have no idea why he would have gotten
> it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The dropdown allows you to delay and get a reminder in up to 4 hours.
> Anyone know why this would pop up, in addition to the normal Software
> Center notification?
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> Information Technology Operations Branch
>
> Data and Technology Division
>
> CA Department of Fish and Wildlife
>
> 1700 9th Street, 3rd Floor
>
> Sacramento, CA  95811
>
> Desk:  (916) 323-1284
>
>
>
> Every Californian should conserve water.  Find out how at:
>
> [image: SaveOurWater_Logo] 
>
> SaveOurWater.com  · Drought.CA.gov
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed
> and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this
> material/information in error,
> please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[Ryan]

Cireson did? I don't see it on their site.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:38 AM Marcum, John  wrote:

> Cierson announced a web front end last week. It's not free but they do
> have some free tools that may do what you need.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Richard
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:48 AM
> To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?
>
> [External Email]
>
> Hi
>
> We use http://softwarecentral.com/ for our ServiceDesk and Desktop
> Technician for their daily use. Advanced stuff is done in the console.
>
> rg
> Richard
>
> On 11-10-2016 18:50, S ConfigMgr wrote:
> > We are running SCCM 1606 , looking for web based solution so that we
> > can replace sccm console and offer as a web service. ?
> >
> > is this possible ?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ED
>
>
> 
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>

[mssms] RE: Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded

[Murray, Mike]

This should read "My Endpoints are NOT getting updated this morning."

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 10:16 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded

 

My Endpoints are getting updated this morning. When I checked the update
package, I see an update from 10/13 that has not been superseded. There are
newer updates, so I'm not sure why this one is still there?

 



 

 

Best Regards,

 

Mike Murray

Desktop Engineer/IT Consultant - IT Support Services

California State University, Chico

530.898.4357
  mmur...@csuchico.edu

 

Remember, Chico State will NEVER ask you for your password via email!  

For more information about recognizing phishing scam emails go to:
http://www.csuchico.edu/isec/basics/spam-and-phishing.shtml

 

 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[mssms] RE: Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Aaron Czechowski]

Ok...I'll bite. :)
I get what you're saying, and I'm really interested to see how this petition 
progresses, but my personal opinion is that this is like asking Stanley to 
standardize on how to join together building materials. Do I use a hammer and 
nail, nailgun, screwdriver and screw (Phillips or flathead or Torx), screw gun 
and screw, staples, or glue/epoxy? They all achieve the same end goal, but they 
are different tools for different circumstances, and you should use the right 
tool for the right job.

A few specific comments. As ya'll know, we're working on more clearly 
differentiating MDT and SCCM - that won't happen overnight, but it's on our 
roadmap.

Windows has already deprecated the imaging component of ICD: see the note at 
the top of 
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/dn916113(v=vs.85).aspx.

Does anyone really use WDS for image management? Or just the Windows PXE server?

As for the others...heard. I assume NSIB is what probably pushed you over the 
edge? I wish we had a better story for Nano Server in SCCM, but without the 
ability to install the client, or manage via MDM, there's not much value in 
hacking together some deployment story if the long-term management does not 
exist. That's a bigger discussion we're having with the server team.

Aaron


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Monday, 17 October, 2016 09:54
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

[mssms] Windows Firewall Remote Desktop oddity

[Mote, Todd]

So in cleaning up some OUs, rearranging and generally redoing some GPOs I came 
across this little gem.

In 2008 and 2008 R2, the built in remote desktop firewall rules are written 
like this:

[cid:image002.png@01D22872.F4580E40]

In 2012, 2012 R2, and 2016, the default rules are written like this:

[cid:image003.png@01D22872.F4580E40]

Note the biggest difference is that there are now three rules, and the Program 
changed from "System" to actual executables, svchost.exe and rdpsa.exe.

Found out today that a policy written on 2012 and up does not work when applied 
to 2008 R2 and down, despite both being "Advanced Firewall" rules.

I couldn't find anything specific about this on the interwebs, heck I'm not 
even sure this list is appropriate, but there it is.  Also, when conflicting 
rules are applied, most lenient wins.  We've found a bunch of 2008 + that still 
have a 2003 firewall policy applied using the old xp/2003 registry style rules 
allowing '*', because things were easier back then, along with later, tighter 
scoped advanced firewall policies, and rdp still works from places it 
shouldn't, or we didn't intend it to anyway.  it turns out windows firewall has 
turned into kind of a mess over time...

And yes, at the moment, I have to manage it at the host...

Todd

[mssms] RE: Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

[Murray, Mike]

Honestly we have a mixed bag of USB keys and they all work fine. Are you
talking about standalone imaging or just putting the boot image on it?
Either way, we use a wide variety.

 

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Chris Carbone
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 9:16 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
Subject: [mssms] Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

 

Hello All,

 

I would like to entertain the idea again of using USB for imaging. In the
past we were using the Kingston Traveler USB 3.0 drives and I recently read
that these are known to have issues with imaging. I did not know this and
always wondered why imaging would sometimes flake out for us. 

 

Does anyone use USB 2.0 drives that you have used for a while that are
consistently working with OSD?


Thanks!

 

Chris

 

 

 

 

This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information
intended only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s).
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on
the contents of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone
immediately. 

 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[mssms] Old Windows Defender update not being marked as superseded

[Murray, Mike]

My Endpoints are getting updated this morning. When I checked the update
package, I see an update from 10/13 that has not been superseded. There are
newer updates, so I'm not sure why this one is still there?

 



 

 

Best Regards,

 

Mike Murray

Desktop Engineer/IT Consultant - IT Support Services

California State University, Chico

530.898.4357
  mmur...@csuchico.edu

 

Remember, Chico State will NEVER ask you for your password via email!  

For more information about recognizing phishing scam emails go to:

http://www.csuchico.edu/isec/basics/spam-and-phishing.shtml

 





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[mssms] Recommended USB Flash Drives for OSD

[Chris Carbone]

Hello All,

I would like to entertain the idea again of using USB for imaging. In the past 
we were using the Kingston Traveler USB 3.0 drives and I recently read that 
these are known to have issues with imaging. I did not know this and always 
wondered why imaging would sometimes flake out for us.

Does anyone use USB 2.0 drives that you have used for a while that are 
consistently working with OSD?

Thanks!

Chris




This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information intended 
only for the use of the individual(s) identified as addressee(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
of this electronic mail transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this transmission in error, please notify me by telephone immediately.

[mssms] Microsoft, please standardize on a single image management tool

[Daniel Ratliff]

https://www.change.org/p/microsoft-microsoft-please-standardize-on-a-single-image-management-solution?recruiter=10885997_source=share_for_starters_medium=copyLink

We feel a lot of pain from this, and Johan agrees this is a good idea. If you 
do to, please consider signing.

Daniel Ratliff


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material.  If you receive this 
material/information in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

RE: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[Marcum, John]

Cierson announced a web front end last week. It's not free but they do have 
some free tools that may do what you need.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:48 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Can i Replace SCCM Console with webbased?

[External Email]

Hi

We use http://softwarecentral.com/ for our ServiceDesk and Desktop Technician 
for their daily use. Advanced stuff is done in the console.

rg
Richard

On 11-10-2016 18:50, S ConfigMgr wrote:
> We are running SCCM 1606 , looking for web based solution so that we 
> can replace sccm console and offer as a web service. ?
>
> is this possible ?
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> ED




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.