Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-09-03 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 01/09/2011 Rob Weir wrote: Good point. Maybe we can get a fixed footer to occur on the user list emails, just 2 or 3 lines ... 1) How to unsubscribe to the list 2) Where to report bugs 3) Where the support forums are 4) File attachments not supported, so here's where to go to share a file

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-09-01 Thread Rob Weir
[mailto:a...@shanecurcuru.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 08:11 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] [ ... ] Personally, if there were some committers who would volunteer to moderate, I'd just create an ooo-user@ mailing

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-09-01 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 18:29:02 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Oh, so it wasn't actually an MS Office file, but a spoof with a .doc filename? I only vaguely remember, but I think it was that way. That would definitely be hard to catch. I'm not sure what would cause it to

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-09-01 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 18:29:02 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Hmm, for (2) I think you have to use orc...@msn.com for me, then. Most of my e-mail addresses (including orc

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-09-01 Thread Daniel Shahaf
: Thursday, September 01, 2011 08:11 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 18:29:02 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Hmm, for (2) I think you have to use orc

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-09-01 Thread Manfred A. Reiter
2011/8/31 Rob Weir r...@robweir.com: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/8/31 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. The experience with the german OOo-users list have shown that

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Simon Phipps
I'd be happy to help out (usually UK timezone). S. On 31 Aug 2011, at 15:32, Rob Weir wrote: Great. Thanks. Could we get a couple more moderator volunteers, say a couple from Europe? Note that a user list will require more moderator assistance than a dev list, with people having

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Manfred A. Reiter
2011/8/31 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. The experience with the german OOo-users list have shown that attachments should be banned. Today it is not an art piece to save a file in net and refer to a link to it. If the user

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Manfred A. Reiter
2011/8/30 Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org: Hey, over here (waving arm in the air)! me too, (if we are talking about en germanophone ML) but I think you are only talking about an english written ML Yes, I will moderate ooo-users. Do you need a minimum of three? M.

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 08/31/2011 08:10 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. The default policy appears to be forbid many attachments, silently stripping them.  This would cause

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Rob, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 14:10:45 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. Any recommendations for what we should enable? Allow all ODF of known extensions, e.g. .odt .ods .odp ... For screenshots allow .png .jpg .jpeg Eike

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Marcus, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 20:56:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: For ooo-support@ files like doc, xls, ppt, odt, ods, odp will be most important. I'd certainly not allow MS binary files as potential malicious code carriers. But also jpg, png, gif for screenshots could be important.

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/31/2011 09:46 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 20:56:16 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: For ooo-support@ files like doc, xls, ppt, odt, ods, odp will be most important. I'd certainly not allow MS binary files as potential malicious code carriers. I know.

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/8/31 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. The experience with the german OOo-users list have shown that attachments should be banned. Today it is

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
in plaintext. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Eike Rathke [mailto:o...@erack.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Hi Marcus, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. The default policy appears to be forbid many attachments, silently stripping them. This would cause chaos on a list used for end-user support, since

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread TJ Frazier
Hi, Manfred, * On 8/31/2011 14:51, Manfred A. Reiter wrote: 2011/8/31 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org: Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. The experience with the german OOo-users list have shown that attachments should be banned. Today it is not an art piece

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread TJ Frazier
On 8/31/2011 16:56, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: When's the last time you heard of malicious code in a Microsoft Office file? No recent version will run macro code without warning and default disabling on load. I would expect mail clients to also be circumspect about allowing direct opening of

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Subject: Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] On 8/31/2011 16:56, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: When's the last time you heard of malicious code in a Microsoft Office file? No recent version will run macro code without warning and default disabling

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:21 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/8/31 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org: Something else to think about for the ooo-users list: file attachments. The experience with the german OOo-users list

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:19 -0400, drew wrote: The average size of an attachment is: 48.7 KB [some of my old numbers have this at 36.4] one correction - current avg size is 36 KB my old notes had 48.7. Total current storage space used by attachments is 373 MB.

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Gavin McDonald
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: a...@shanecurcuru.org Subject: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Hey, over here (waving arm in the air)! Yes, I will moderate ooo-users. Do you need a minimum of three? It would also be good to have

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 13:56:13 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: When's the last time you heard of malicious code in a Microsoft Office file? No recent version will run macro code without warning and default disabling on load. True, nowadays sending such may be pointless. I

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 13:56:13 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Not being able to send attachments is apparently a constant for user lists. I'm not sure they work here on ooo-dev either. At least plain text attachments get through, of various MIME types. Eike --

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 13:56:13 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: When's the last time you heard of malicious code in a Microsoft Office file? No recent version will run

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Rob Weir
...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Hey, over here (waving arm in the air)! Yes, I will moderate ooo-users. Do you need a minimum of three? It would also be good to have one additional so we can handle the occasional CJK and Eastern European message that comes in, maybe others

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Jean Weber
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 08:35, Dennis E. Hamilton hims...@orcmid.com wrote: Hmm, so the problem in the case of the list is that it is a broadcast medium, and someone can be expected to not practice safe unzipping.  Got it. OK, no attachments. There is also the issue that even if the

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 08:05 +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote: Sometime before this thread has deviated into too many different directions it may be an idea if someone created an infra issue asking for the list to be created. *chuckling*what an idea. haven't had

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 18:41 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Aug 31, 2011, at 6:25 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 08:05 +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote: Sometime before this thread has deviated into too many different directions it may be an idea if someone created an

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread TJ Frazier
On 8/31/2011 19:01, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 14:17:38 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: [... reordering quotes and adding a quote level for better readability, stripping rest ...] From: TJ Frazier Funny you should mention that. That very problem occurred on

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 08:35, Dennis E. Hamilton hims...@orcmid.com wrote: Hmm, so the problem in the case of the list is that it is a broadcast medium, and someone can be expected to not practice safe unzipping.  Got it.

RE: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Message- From: Eike Rathke [mailto:o...@erack.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 16:01 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Hi Dennis, On Wednesday, 2011-08-31 14:17:38 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-31 Thread Rob Weir
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:19 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 18:41 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Aug 31, 2011, at 6:25 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-30 Thread Shane Curcuru
On 8/24/2011 1:28 AM, Terry Ellison wrote: I've just been catching up and reading this thread. Most of the main points have been made and discussed. But I think that there is one point that hasn't: so let me summarise so far: * DLs and Forums each have their sweet-spot advantages and

[ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-30 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
. (At least to help us tell the difference between spam and user inquiries.) - Dennis -Original Message- From: Shane Curcuru [mailto:a...@shanecurcuru.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 08:11 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-30 Thread Rob Weir
, August 30, 2011 08:11 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] [ ... ] Personally, if there were some committers who would volunteer to moderate, I'd just create an ooo-user@ mailing list now.  Almost all projects already

Re: [ooo-user] was RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-30 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Dennis and all, I will take care of CJK users and questions. :) Thanks, khirano On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote: Hey, over here (waving arm in the air)! Yes, I will moderate ooo-users. Do you need a minimum of three? It would also be good to

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
27, 2011 00:39 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] I'll not quote anyone here because this is a general consideration... ;) On the discussion about which is the best way to help users, several times

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-25 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi all, We don't have brand new OOo builds, AOOo, yet. :) We don't have any AOOo users yet. After the release of AOOo we will get traditional users and new users from many parts of the world. Do we know how many AOOo users we get, what kind of users they are, what they think and how they act? No

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-25 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Drew, I didn't realize the imbalance between using the tag and mentioning without the tag was that lop-sided. By the way, there is also http://superuser.com/search?q=openoffice.org. Things that can be done

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-25 Thread Rob Weir
, August 24, 2011 13:15 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Drew, I didn't realize the imbalance between using the tag and mentioning without the tag was that lop-sided. By the way, there is also http

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-25 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
[mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob Weir Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:27 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: This should

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 23.08.2011 23:40, schrieb Jean Weber: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other. Personal observation (not intended as a generalization): my preferences vary with whether I'm a

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Mathias and all, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Besides that: IMHO we should discuss Rob's proposal to think about next-gen support media (I really like the stack overflow web site and similar sites). Rating and credit systems are a wonderful way

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/24/2011 02:10 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald: -Original Message- From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 12:05 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 18:00 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote: Hi Mathias and all, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Besides that: IMHO we should discuss Rob's proposal to think about next-gen support media (I really like the stack overflow web site and

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 18:00 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote: Hi Mathias and all, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Besides that: IMHO we should discuss Rob's proposal to think about

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Rob, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 09:39:02 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: What if we just had support forums, but no users list?  Would we miss anything?  Would users?  Note that phpBB forums allow a person to subscribe to a forum or a topic, so those who want to receive emails can.  But they would

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:01 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: It looks to me as if we need to be following the openoffice.org tag on StackOverflow. They have over 1200 items, and there is an openoffice.org tag/category although it is not always used. Hi Dennis, Sadly, not so - the link I

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
[Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 08:01 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: It looks to me as if we need to be following the openoffice.org tag on StackOverflow. They have over 1200 items, and there is an openoffice.org tag/category although it is not always used. Hi

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-24 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Drew and all, Thanks. On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:25 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=openoffice http://ask.debian.net/ http://libreoffice.shapado.com/ I see. These sites are the next-gens! Looks great. Is it easy to localize them? Thanks, khirano

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 23.08.2011 02:18, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: The changes are good at showing where we are as developers. The unfortunate point is that us...@openoffice.org is still a functional list with several posts in a day and the

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Wasn't there consensus to wait for new mailing lists until there is really a need to split up the things? When we would follow this way, then we have to wait until the messages on ooo-dev@ from normal users grow up too much. Otherwise we would create a mailing list for (currently) nobody.

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Jean Weber
IMO, any ordinary user who stumbled upon this list (ooo-dev) would be frightened away immediately. This list is totally unsuitable for user support. --Jean On 23/08/2011, at 19:02, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Wasn't there consensus to wait for new mailing lists until there is

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/23/2011 02:18 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net wrote: The changes are good at showing where we are as developers. The unfortunate point is that us...@openoffice.org is still a functional list with several posts in a day and the

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Jean Weber
When users see what looks like an email address in the context of support, they typically think it is a help desk, not a mailing list (and they may not even know what a mailing list is). A forum is not going to be mistaken for a help desk email address. So I think Terry and others are correct

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
I can imagine what you think of. However, this was our consensus; or at least the last standpoint in the discussion weeks ago. I'm fine when we now decide different and create a new mailing list just for users. Marcus Am 08/23/2011 11:08 AM, schrieb Jean Weber: IMO, any ordinary user who

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
+1 Am 08/23/2011 11:32 AM, schrieb Jean Weber: When users see what looks like an email address in the context of support, they typically think it is a help desk, not a mailing list (and they may not even know what a mailing list is). A forum is not going to be mistaken for a help desk email

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: When users see what looks like an email address in the context of support, they typically think it is a help desk, not a mailing list (and they may not even know what a mailing list is). A forum is not going to be mistaken

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Jean Hollis Weber
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 07:57 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: When users see what looks like an email address in the context of support, they typically think it is a help desk, not a mailing list (and they may not even know what

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't get the answer unless someone is CC'ing them. That actually is a failure of how the list is setup when it has Reply-To pointing to the mailing list

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't get the answer unless someone is CC'ing them. That actually is a failure of how

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't get the answer unless someone is CC'ing them. That actually is a failure of how the list is setup

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:29:50 +0200 Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote: snip Mailing lists are much more accepted by those who actually help because handling is much easier than any web forum. You can setup your own scoring, flags, delete unimportant stuff in your personal archive and so on. To

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Donald Whytock
Just a couple centavos... Some companies' firewalls block social sites. Aside from obvious targets like Facebook and Myspace, automatic categorizers like IronPort will flag sites that say anything about blogs, forums, community, etc. At one office, Springsource.org was blocked for me for the

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Marcus and all, On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: At the end it seems the best solution is still to go 2 ways: ML and forum. +1 The forum will support 10 languages such as EN(English), ES(Spanish), FR(French), HU(Hungarian), IT(Italian), JA(Japanese),

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: snip At the end it seems the best solution is still to go 2 ways: ML and forum. Best in what way? If half of us want pizza for dinner, and the other half want sushi, is the best solution to have sushi pizza? I think

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread drew
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 09:39 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't get the answer unless

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/23/2011 05:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: snip At the end it seems the best solution is still to go 2 ways: ML and forum. Best in what way? If half of us want pizza for dinner, and the other half want sushi, is the

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Andy Brown
Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: snip At the end it seems the best solution is still to go 2 ways: ML and forum. Best in what way? If half of us want pizza for dinner, and the other half want sushi, is the best solution to have

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:29:50 +0200 Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote: snip Mailing lists are much more accepted by those who actually help because handling is much easier than any web forum. You can

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't get the answer unless someone

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread RGB ES
2011/8/23 Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net: This road is getting old.  We have already discussed this, back in June.  I saw the same old discussion on the LibO list last year. Yes, and it was a sad show... People can get very vocal about this holy war between forums and ML. For my part I do

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't get the answer unless

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 07:05 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Kazunari Hirano
Hi Rob, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: ooo-users-en.i.a.o ooo-users-es.i.a.o ooo-users-hu.i.a.o ooo-users-it.i.a.o ooo-users-ja.i.a.o ooo-users-nl.i.a.o ooo-users-pl.i.a.o ooo-users-vi.i.a.o ooo-users-zh.i.a.o Looks great! We create them on request.

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't get the answer unless someone is CC'ing them. That actually

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Dave Fisher
(OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 07:05 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
and the forum. They are not redundant.  Some people will use both.  - Dennis -Original Message- From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 07:05 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often they write to the list but aren't subscribed. So they don't

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Jean Weber
Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other. Personal observation (not intended as a generalization): my preferences vary with whether I'm a consumer or a provider of support services. As a

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Yes, it seems a bit difficult to decide what is the best for all or at least the majority of our users. Maybe someone has some more agruements about MLs vs. forums. Marcus Am 08/23/2011 11:40 PM, schrieb Jean Weber: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Andy Brown
Jean Weber wrote: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other. Personal observation (not intended as a generalization): my preferences vary with whether I'm a consumer or a provider of

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 07:05 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus, On Tuesday, 2011-08-23 11:11:35 +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote: And very often

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread RGB ES
2011/8/23 Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other. Personal observation (not intended as a generalization): my preferences vary with whether I'm a

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other. Personal observation (not intended as a generalization): my preferences

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread drew
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 07:40 +1000, Jean Weber wrote: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: My observation. It's minimal. Most responders are in one of the other, but not both. //drew

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread drew
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 16:49 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: I can understand Rob's arguement that we have to split ourself to give support for mailing list(s) and forum in parallel. However, I believe that it would be an

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread drew
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 18:08 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other. Personal

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Jean Weber wrote: Idle curiosity: I wonder how many people who offer support do it in both places: mailing list and forum, or more or exclusively in one or the other. Personal

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Gavin McDonald
-Original Message- From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2011 12:05 AM To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Am 08/23/2011 03:29 PM, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Marcus

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Well .. An important difference, I think, is that the forum will serve for all openoffice variants (including LibreOffice). The mailinlist can only attend issues related to Apache OpenOffice since its the codebase we maintain and support. Pedro. On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:01 +0200, Marcus

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Andy Brown
Gavin McDonald wrote: From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Maybe, but they are still not subscribed. So the moderator has to let the posts through; again and again until the user is subscribed. ew,, no that does not have to happen at all. the moderator can do a reply-all ,

RE: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
-Original Message- From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 18:12 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org] Well .. An important difference, I think, is that the forum

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Weir
@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]  Well ..  An important difference, I think, is that the forum will serve for all  openoffice variants (including LibreOffice). The mailinlist can only  attend issues related to Apache OpenOffice

Re: us...@openoffice.org [Was: Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org]

2011-08-23 Thread Terry Ellison
I've just been catching up and reading this thread. Most of the main points have been made and discussed. But I think that there is one point that hasn't: so let me summarise so far: * DLs and Forums each have their sweet-spot advantages and disadvantages. * In general individuals

Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org

2011-08-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On 08/21/2011 03:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: I've updated the text on http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html; (with borrowed text from Mathias). Marcus That should help a bit I think! :) Am 08/19/2011 07:57 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 08/19/2011 07:29 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Fri,

Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org

2011-08-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
@all: If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've write access) please let me know. Marcus Am 08/22/2011 11:10 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/21/2011 03:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: I've updated the text on http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html; (with borrowed

Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org

2011-08-22 Thread Andy Brown
Marcus (OOo) wrote: @all: If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've write access) please let me know. Marcus If you have access, maybe on the mailing list page on the OOo site [1] or [2]. If not then post a message to the list that your on. [1]

Re: [Discussion] d...@openoffice.org

2011-08-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown: Marcus (OOo) wrote: @all: If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've write access) please let me know. Marcus If you have access, maybe on the mailing list page on the OOo site [1] or [2]. If not then post a message to the

  1   2   >