On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 10:21 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
The error messages in embedded:startup.tcl refer to
line numbers.
It would be good to distribute startup.tcl for reference,
even if it is not required.
If the user can't look in the source code, then they need to report the
bug to
The proper solution: tell the maintainers of your vsnprintf to improve
their implementation! ;) --Z
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 02:20 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Do not apply. The old implementation was total crap, and your vsnprintf
implementation must be too. That's not our problem, and it can
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 03:04 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series creates two new helper APIs: 'module' and 'stack'.
It applies on top of my outstanding patches; pull from repo.or.cz.
FWIW, I have pushed a revised version of these to my mirror to include
proper copyright blurbs
I think David has explained why this is not a good idea for a default.
It is not always safe and presents an option that would need to be
disabled when bringing up new boards. Bring-up is hard enough without
having to fight the tools from trying to be smarter than they are.
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 14:33 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
These patches clean up the server and system startup. The first patch
factors the GDB server setup to be more conducive to deferred
initialization of targets (in a later series).
The second provides the 'noinit' command
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 19:00 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series includes only minor changes. Applies on top of the last
series to allow deferred 'init'.
Share and Enjoy,
--Z
___
Openocd-development mailing list
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 19:03 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series removes the 'interp' global variable from the system,
bringing us a step closer to supporting several active command contexts.
Share and Enjoy,
--Z
___
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:38 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Adds a fully-documented API for dynamically loading libraries and
looking up symbols or addresses in them.
Seems to me I've seen one or two or three or four of these
before ... must
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 14:42 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Registers a signal handler to catch SIGSEGV in order to display the
stack where the program crashed.
Is this for inside OpenOCD? If so, I'd rather just expect folk
to run inside
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:08 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
I think David has explained why this is not a good idea for a default.
It is not always safe and presents an option that would need to be
disabled when bringing
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 23:42 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009, David Brownell wrote:
(Patches to move the mrc and mcr code into
struct arm are due too ... MIPS and other cores do not support
those ARM-specific concepts.)
Needed for testing, even ... here it is.
Excellent. I came up with nearly the same patch before running out for
the evening. The difference being that I put _after_ the last possible
failure path, so it's possible to recover and try again.
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 22:43 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, David
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 18:16 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Yeah, I figure there are some scripts (or users) that have not been
sufficiently strict about CONFIG vs. EXEC modes, as that logic has been
broken for ages
Broken how? It's
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 18:47 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Finally, would it be logical to create the dynamic flash banks commands
as subcommands of their relevant target?
foo.cpu flash bank bank0 . # but no target arg anymore
foo.cpu bank0 info # presently, it's 'flash
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 21:01 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I disagree. You can't use flash without a target. We should never
offer that command without a target for it to be used with. The user
should not need to pull the two together on their own.
Sure you can! I even believe that there
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 19:31 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:24 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Well, drat. The patch that I pushed had some unintended consequences.
Any Jim subcommand handlers' output now gets suppressed too, which
negatively affected my recently posted series
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 09:48 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 19:31 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:24 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Well, drat. The patch that I pushed had some unintended consequences.
Any Jim subcommand handlers' output now gets suppressed too
Hi all,
Some additional patches could improve the help system further.
First, the command name matching logic can be improved to allow partial
matching and better support invalid subcommand invocations (e.g. running
'dummy missing' should produce the help for 'dummy', but it shows the
generic
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 14:07 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Next, we should consider updating all help messages to full sentences,
so the new command mode information will follow the final period.
And make sure the usage is all strict BNF. I
Hi all,
I used exclamation points in $SUBJECT, because these suggestions will
have drastic user-visible impact -- though the effects can be mitigated.
All of the work done that I have done recently on the command handling
system has established a foundation for migrating the script language to
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 15:10 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
I just pulled everything into a workspace and built it ... now it's
failing left and right.
It complains about using poll off and jtag_reset 1 1 after reset,
which is when they're supposed to be usable...
I had tested that the patch
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 15:21 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, David Brownell wrote:
I just pulled everything into a workspace and built it ... now it's
failing left and right.
It complains about using poll off and jtag_reset 1 1 after reset,
which is when
Thanks! I'll push this shortly, as it seems like the sort of thing that
would accidentally get dropped during my cleanup efforts. I'll take
your word that it works. :)
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 23:41 +, lementec fabien wrote:
Hi, there is a bug in s3c24xx_nand. Here the
fix:
diff --git
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 16:36 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
I believe that the real problem is that the .mode initializer for those
commands' registration records have been marked incorrectly. There may
be others It's easy to discover
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 07:55 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Does this change the syntax for scripts?
No, but it does extend it. All relevant top-level commands have been
made available underneath the jtag and target-instance commands.
--Z
___
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 07:56 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
What's this??? A pure virtual test target?
Does it work with the dummy interface and faux flash driver?
Would be neat :-)
That's the idea. It's a work in progress that went in during my initial
command registration restructuring,
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 23:37 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 26 November 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Does this change the syntax for scripts?
And what might have caused nand list output to repeat? As if
the command got called twice...
nand list
#0: NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit (Micron)
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 19:52 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Fixes regression in interface command registration.
master branch currently fails to build with --enable-minidriver-dummy
(and other interfaces).
Do not apply. The register_commands callback was removed on purpose, as
it does not
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 11:00 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 19:52 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Fixes regression in interface command registration.
master branch currently fails to build with --enable-minidriver-dummy
(and other interfaces).
Do not apply
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 20:48 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 19:52 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Fixes regression in interface command registration.
master branch currently fails to build
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:47 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 27 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
And what might have caused nand list output to repeat? As if
the command got called twice...
Saw the same with arm reg. Do all commands repeat their output?
All not-top-level
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:24 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Well, drat. The patch that I pushed had some unintended consequences.
Any Jim subcommand handlers' output now gets suppressed too, which
negatively affected my recently posted series to split apart the
top-level Jim handlers.
The patches
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:05 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Error: type 'xscale' is missing write_phys_memory
Error: type 'xscale' is missing read_phys_memory
Ignore these errors. They are only reminders to the developers
to add this support to the xscale target.
I saw these two
Pushed, with another minor-but-related help text fix. Thanks!
--Z
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 08:36 -0500, Eric Wetzel wrote:
Hello,
'flash erase_sector' and 'flash protect' have not been working for me
recently. Passing them the correct number of arguments (3 and 4,
respectively) returns the
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 18:12 +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Hi,
please pull from the doc-fixes branch from my OpenOCD repo:
Clone URL:
git clone git://gitorious.org/openocd/openocd.git
The branch has a bunch of minor typos and documentation fixes.
Pulled, rebased against the current
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 14:02 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I have finished my series to convert the tree to use the improved
command registration methodology. I apologize for the number of patches
in these series; however, only a handful of patches are bigger than 10K,
and most are just
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:45 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 14:02 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
Hi all,
I have finished my series to convert the tree to use the improved
command registration methodology. I apologize for the number of patches
in these series; however, only
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 13:08 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:54 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
[snip]
That said, it feels like very bad form to omit forward
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 14:53 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
Add jtag/usb_common.[ch] to hold routines shared between the USB JTAG
interface drivers.
This series adds the first helper, jtag_usb_open that unifies the steps
required to probe the USB busses and devices, matching
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 10:17 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I can no longer build docs when src != build. I believe this is trivially
reproducible and that the breakage is relatively recent(a month
or so).
Or... perhaps I'm missing some tool on my laptop?
make docs
make doxygen
= both
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 08:38 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Unless there are any objections, I am going to push this series today.
Reads OK. Doesn't affect FT2232 support. I'd say go for it.
And with this feedback, I've pushed them out. Share
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 20:52 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
I'll push this if I don't hear anything.
The code adheres to these rules at this point pretty much.
There are a few sites that could be a bit better, but I don't
fear that there are plentiful of bad examples that are
copied and pasted.
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 13:21 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
I think the subject of Embeddeding Open
needs to be addressed more comprehensively in its own section.
I'm not disagreeing ... but what would be in that section?
Some of the folk
Hi all,
I have finished my series to convert the tree to use the improved
command registration methodology. I apologize for the number of patches
in these series; however, only a handful of patches are bigger than 10K,
and most are just boring semi-mechanical transformations.
The following
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:33 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
First of all, screw you for all of these patches. Frekin' 80+ emails!
Yeah, sorry. ;) I particularly apologize for 'git send-email' failing
to properly thread the messages for each series under their summaries.
Even so, only the first and
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:54 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
It is an error to require other headers to be included first, so declare
what we can (struct declarations) and include the rest (Jim types).
This one seemed out of step with
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:51 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
The following benefits can be expected from this work:
- Command registration is much simpler and easier to read and update.
- All registrations now get proper error checking
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 21:55 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:33 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
First of all, screw you for all of these patches. Frekin' 80+ emails!
Yeah, sorry. ;) I particularly apologize for 'git send-email
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:08 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 21:55 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 16:33 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
First of all, screw you for all
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 23:32 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 22:08 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Your usage of --in-reply-to is wrong. That made all patch series to end
up in the same thread.
How could I have done it right
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 08:00 +0100, EG wrote:
Hello,
please find a tar attached containing additional files and a diff to
add flash support for the ADUC706x controller to openocd 0.3.1 ...
Best regards, Enrico
Enrico,
Some initial feedback:
1. Please send only plain text attachments or
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:19 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Would anyone mind if the arm920t and arm720t cp15 commands
were retired?
The only user of arm920t in the tcl directory is csb337.cfg.
If someone could offer a translation of the arm920t cp15 2 0xc0001078
command to mcr syntax + test
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:04 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
Hi all,
I've finished up the implementation and documentation for an AT91SAM9
NAND driver for OpenOCD. In total there are about 34 patches that
includes some refactor work for both the NAND controller layer and the
ARM NAND I/O
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 22:22 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Andreas Fritiofson
andreas.fritiof...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Øyvind Harboe
PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:04 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
Hi all,
I've finished up the implementation and documentation for an
AT91SAM9
NAND driver for OpenOCD. In total there are about 34
Looks great, but one minor comment below
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 00:37 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
The previous implementation was unnecessarily complex. Get rid of the loops,
let vsnprintf() tell us directly how much storage we need and allocate that. A
second pass writes the actual
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:36 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 20 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Also, any reason to hold off on this present series or the USB series?
These command patches, didn't see a reason.
Okay, I've made a few trivial changes to them after working
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 21:31 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Why is a table better than a fn call for registering commands?
It's harder to screw up with the new way of doing things, as the
registration parameters are more explicit. It also eliminates a lot of
redundant calls to register_command{,s}
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 16:24 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 21 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
+static const struct command_registration at91rm9200_command_handlers[] = {
+ {
+ .name = at91rm9200_device,
+ .handler =
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 00:52 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
PATH_MAX should be defined and available (in limits.h). Use it.
Why
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 01:56 +0100, Andreas Fritiofson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
Checkout your branch and run 'git rebase master'. That will update your
branch against the current master. Then, do the same thing with '-i'.
Select
Pushed. Thanks for helping track this down. --Z
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 23:23 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
I can verify that this patch makes the fake errors go away.
// Dean Glazeski
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
Another whoops
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:08 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 20 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Use insertion sort to the command link lists. The only practical effect
of this is to order the output of the new 'help' command.
O(really)? O(n) != O(1). ;)
Not that it can
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 23:25 -0600, Dean Glazeski wrote:
Hi all,
Recent NAND file I/O changes are parsing the wrong argument for the
size. Should be third argument, not second.
Pushed. Let me know if you find any other problems. Incidentally, does
the 'new verify' command work for you
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 02:56 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series improves on the patch sent previously to add bank names.
It adds a 'name' field to the flash and nand bank structures.
This name must be passed as the first argument to the 'flash bank' and
'nand device'
here.
As another curveball, it reads 0x1B when not verifying oob and 0x05
when I tell it to at location 0. The correct value in the file is
0x1E for that location and the NAND device does return this value when
read.
// Dean Glazeski
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Zach Welch z
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 15:08 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
At the moment, I just want correctness. Thanks for doing the detective
work, but you're also welcom.
Whoops... that one slipped away from me you're also welcome to put
together an initial patch for it. Similarly, you are welcome
present proper fault
output. It makes it hard to trace problems when regressions happen :)
I'll spend some time with that once I have the AT91SAM9 NAND working
and get a start with the dataflash.
// Dean Glazeski
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote
after the '.'. I'm not
really sure why this is there or how to fix it.
// Dean Glazeski
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 02:56 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series improves
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 19:47 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Why is there even a number appended?
Just let whoever defines the name define it however they want,
and insist only that it be unique.
That will get rid of lots of possible errors inthe code...
Well, the code in question supports
I have been considering another round of reorganization, which would
include such restructuring. Such work is very invasive, though.
Please tell me more about future type of flash. I am considering adding
a base type to unify the flash/nand code, so let me know how it might
impact those plans.
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:39 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series modularizes the startup.tcl file, putting various pieces
of the system where they belong. Instead of linking it into the library,
provide it as a parameter to the command_init() routine from openocd.c.
Fixes the
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:07 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Adds several macros similar to COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER, but for parsing
boolean command arguments. Two flavors are provided to provide
drop-in compatibility with existing code, allow
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:23 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:39 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series modularizes the startup.tcl file, putting various pieces
of the system where they belong. Instead
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:34 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:23 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:39 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series modularizes the startup.tcl file, putting
, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:34 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:23 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 18 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:39 -0800, Zachary
// Dean Glazeski
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
Okay I've pushed it. However, I have to wonder if I am
the only one
that is a little surprised that this was the source of the
problem
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:30 -0800, Zach Welch wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 11:07 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
It gets annoying to need to recall which variant of
true/false a given routine needs. :)
It's part of a generally good rule too: be forgiving with what you
accept for input
Very nice. Keep 'em comin'. --Z
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 16:41 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Change the layout to show the Secure Monitor registers too,
when they're present.
Instead of lining registers for each of six (or seven) modes up
in adjacent vertical columns, display each mode's
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 08:27 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series attempts to improve the handling of command arguments
that use on/off or enable/disable options. This is accomplished by
macros that work similarly to the COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER, causing the
caller to return (and
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:01 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 16 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
As suggsted by the first commit message, the final act will involve
the removeal of the migration macros; however, that should wait
until we near 1.0, in the event that further
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:42 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Zach Welch z...@superlucidity.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:01 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 16 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
As suggsted by the first commit message, the final
Hi all,
After producing my last patch to the flash module, I have been thinking
that it should be possible (and worthwhile) to use container_of() in
order to unify the driver structures (and maybe the banks too). At the
very least, the bank commands and block read/write can be unified in a
new
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 04:09 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Add get_flash_bank_by_name (and get_nand_device_by_name) helpers
to retrieves struct flash_bank * (struct nand_device *) given a
driver name and an (optional) driver-specific
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 07:02 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
The first patch extends the Doxygen build process to produce a PDF
version of the developer manual. Due to the time it takes to (re)build,
the second patch adds configuration options for the user to explicitly
enable this
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 18:43 +0100, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Zachary T Welch z...@superlucidity.net
wrote:
Hi all,
This series modularizes the startup.tcl file, putting various pieces
of the system where they belong. Instead of linking it into the library,
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:34 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series converts all COMMAND_HANDLER routines to use a new
struct command_invocation to pass parameters by reference.
This migration is managed by introducing macros for the remaining
handler arguments, using them
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 07:02 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
The first patch extends the Doxygen build process to produce a PDF
version of the developer manual. Due to the time it takes to (re)build,
the second patch adds configuration options for the user to explicitly
enable this
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 11:14 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Hi all,
This series updates the binarybuffers helpers. While the changes have
been split almost per-function, they could be split further if desired.
Overall, I expect a modest improvements for operations that use these,
because
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 13:17 -0800, Zachary T Welch wrote:
This series was started to eliminate some duplicated code, but I threw
in the new 'nand verify' command to exploit the new helper functions.
I have no clue as to whether it will be useful or not; if not, the last
two patches could be
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 16:11 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 15 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
I'd be happier if it were called DIV_ROUND_UP() like a
certain OS kernel I could mention ... not as cryptic.
I agree that the current name stands to be improved.
(Likewise
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 13:57 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi,
I have compiled and installed libftdi from GIT, forcing the prefix to
/usr. The lib header files are then installed into /usr/include/libftdi.
However, the current configure.in for OpenOCD expects file ftdi.h to be
in
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 10:20 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 16 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
Eliminate redundant check that gets covered by using unsigned type.
Same can be done to the struct arm methods of the same name.
Also, note that there are a number of Tcl commands
I am going to name Mr. Copy and Mr. Paste as the culprits, your honor.
Since they were acting on my direct orders, I ask mercy from the court.
I definitely know better and will try to do better in the future. :)
--Z
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:54 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Newly introduced
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 19:59 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 14 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 12:56 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 14 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote:
- for (unsigned i = 0, num_bytes = CEIL(size, 8); i num_bytes
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 02:19 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 15 November 2009, Dean Glazeski wrote:
I've done an implementation of reading using an on-chip algorithm for NAND
devices attached to ARM chips. It seems to work on my AT91SAM9260 board
increasing nand dump from 0.2 kb/s to
Did you use --enable-maintainer-mode when running configure?
I believe that will fix this particular problem.
--Z
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 13:16 +0100, Ferdinand Postema wrote:
Hi Peter,
I had the same problem. It seems that the new version of tetex (version
3.0.0-3) is causing the problem.
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 16:12 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Sunday 15 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote:
Or maybe I was. Given that it copies everything, why
is there code *after* the copy mangling the last byte?
Wouldn't that only be correct when the code copied
all
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 13:38 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
The nest of header inclusions is something of a mess; touch
one, and totally unrelated code will need to be recompiled.
So here are a few patches making that a bit better for the
headers in the target part of the tree. In order:
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 08:22 +, Andrew Rogers wrote:
SWD is not finished yet, a long way to go. Adding the actual hardware
drivers is a almost the last thing on my list. I want to get the
framework in place first.
What I have done is to get a SWD interface listed when you use 'openocd
-c
101 - 200 of 873 matches
Mail list logo
