to destroy opensolaris-3? This action cannot be
undone (y/[n]):
y
Please file bug reports or enhancement requests at
http://defect.opensolaris.org
Thanks!
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1406
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
wan_jm wrote:
I want to find the source code for /usr/sbin/df , but I don't know to search,
use which key word and what project is it in?
could you please help me?
thanks.
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/search?q=defs=refs=path=dfhist=project=%2Fonnv
--
Shawn Walker
of the command line is corrupted and you can't
actually see what was typed before.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Brent Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Matt Harrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Matt Harrison wrote:
I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line
wrapping problem that is driving me mad
anyway...
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
this question...
The short answer is No; you can't use that guide for OpenSolaris 2008.05.
You might be able to use it for SXCE builds, but I wouldn't expect that
to hold true in the coming months.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Christian Kaiser wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Christian Kaiser wrote:
Christian Kaiser wrote:
Hi all,
I want to setup a diskless OpenSolaris client. Chapter 7 of the
Solaris System Administration Guide (Basic Administation) explains
how a client can be installed with the help of PXE
Shawn Walker wrote:
Christian Kaiser wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Christian Kaiser wrote:
Christian Kaiser wrote:
Hi all,
I want to setup a diskless OpenSolaris client. Chapter 7 of the
Solaris System Administration Guide (Basic Administation) explains
how a client can be installed
a few things that need to happen, but I'd say
we're on the road to victory.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
approval as onerous.
Those were the least of my worries in my own experience.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
install SUNWgcc SUNWhea, etc.?
It's better to install the gcc-dev package as it will install all of the
basic headers and other items you need along with gcc.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and finding out how you can help make this a reality.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
...
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
along with 17% of the swap. Is there
a problem here?
How much memory do you have in your system and what build are you
upgrading from?
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
% of the memory is in use along
with 17% of the swap. Is there a problem here?
How much memory do you have in your system and what build are you
upgrading from?
--
Shawn Walker
Shawn: I have 512 M of RAM and am upgrading from 5.11-0.0
That could certainly explain it. However, when I asked
at the older end are much better than apt for selection and
frequency of updates?
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
our primary goals and the resources
spent developing are better spent on improving the primary user experience.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
As Belenix and Nexenta (and others) have proven, if time is spent
producing great things rather than simply wishing that they occurred,
success can be achieved.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
What some of the corporate sponsors for the community choose to do with
their products and trademarks is their rightful decision and community
members should
Stephen Lau wrote:
On 10/23/08 8:06 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
What some of the corporate sponsors for the community choose to do with
their products and trademarks is their rightful decision and community
members should not expect to have control over them.
Very true... however I don't
Stephen Lau wrote:
On 10/23/08 8:58 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Shawn Walker schrieb:
I'm pretty sure that one-line update would be, it hasn't been released
because it's not ready yet. :-)
And what about a schedule? Something like 'We hope to have
or filesystem is for
storing add-on software to the system.
If this is unpackaged software, that's where I'd put it.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Paweł Tęcza wrote:
Shawn Walker pisze:
Paweł Tęcza wrote:
Hello People,
I've googled a lot and I'm confused, because I still don't know what the
best place for installation of add-on apps under OpenSolaris is.
For example, I want to compile and install some free software/open
source
the second value is the BSSID/IBSSID.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Roman Strobl wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Have you tried connecting from the command line first using dladm, and
then adding the network to /etc/nwam/known_wifi_nets ?
The line in known_wifi_nets should look like:
networkff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
...where the second value is the BSSID/IBSSID
to
upgrade to the latest build?
http://ipkg.sfbay/release/
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Shawn Walker wrote:
Bill Shannon wrote:
Is there another site, perhaps an internal Sun site, that I can use to
upgrade to the latest build?
http://ipkg.sfbay/release/
Actually, *latest builds* would be:
http://ipkg.sfbay/dev/
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
that was fixed was this one:
$ BUILD=`uname -v | sed -e s/snv_// -e s/[a-z]//`
...note the change to strip a-z from the build number.
However, Stephen's right, you shouldn't need to do this any more.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss
update each of those bugs with a comment about which build
of OpenSolaris you are running and the output of pkg version; that
would be very helpful.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
why you think you can't do all of that using
opensolaris.org, but good luck.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
C. Bergström wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
C. Bergström wrote:
If have no idea why you think you can't do all of that using
opensolaris.org, but good luck.
I emailed about having the ml created here and was told I needed to
start a project.
I read the instructions at [1] and in all
on opensolaris.org with the right CG
sponsorship. In fact, it's something I'd wanted to do for a long time
but simply don't have the time to do so.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
C. Bergström wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
* Review: The primary constraint in the past for contributions was
people to review and commit contributions. As you might have noticed,
the ON gate moved to mercurial not long ago, and community members
outside of Sun should have commit access soon
to getting involved in creating more packages, and
making OpenSolaris a more viable alternative to other OS's.
The folks on the sw-porters-discuss list should be able to help you better.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
was.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
a clue?
You can't, at the moment. If you need to add more information, you can
either email the requesting engineer firstname.lastname AT sun.com or
you can email someone here and they can add it for you.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris
solarg wrote:
hello all,
i'm surprised that gnu chmod is installed, what are the advantages
comparing to solaris chmod?
It's very annoying when using ACLs.
Familiarity; put /usr/bin first in your path if you'd prefer to use
/usr/bin/chmod instead of /usr/gnu/bin/chmod.
--
Shawn Walker
using.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
being
used quite extensively.
Also, one thing to mention, GNU chmod and ls won't have any problems
with UFS ACLs, only ZFS ACLs.
Semantics, but yes, basically. But as for OpenSolaris 2008.x, I suspect
there are far more single user machines as you put it then multi-user
machines.
--
Shawn
install
SUNWtcsh isn't sufficient.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
package. Use and
redistribution subject to license terms as described in the documents
included in the sources. That really isn't going to work long-term.
* Many packages don't have a summary.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
have ffmpeg or mplayer though.
I would hope that the fluendo folks can make the necessary changes to
their codecs to take advantage of this; paired with their upcoming dvd
player, we might finally have a first-class DVD playback experience on
OpenSolaris.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
and is continuing to change with the OpenSolaris 200x
releases?
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, but...
its potentially better than SXCE, but nowhere near as atomic as BFU...
You're confusing shortcomings in the build and upgrade process with a
perceived lack of change when it comes to download size.
Those download sizes will be significantly reduced in the future.
Cheers,
--
Shawn
or OS107??? worked
fine in 106...
Are you running VirtualBox 2.1.2? If so, upgrade to 2.1.4.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
(to me) how to add a new addon authority.
See set-authority in man pkg.
I mean in a configuration... not from command line. I did see the
Again, there is no documented interface for doing this other than
through the command line or the GUI.
--
Shawn Walker
Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
Hi
Is there a tool like linux dmesg for opensolaris?
See man dmesg
/usr/bin/dmesg
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
James Mansion wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
There are a set of rules about what characters are allowed in the
name. Spaces are one of the characters that are not allowed.
I seem to remember being bitten by that too, albeit briefly. I seem to
remember cursing the lack of clarity of diagnostic
/pkgutil -install stellarium
^
There's your problem. '-install' should be '-i' or '--install'.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, and it's not a
symlink.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
maybe there's a syntax
error in the file or something causing vim to ignore its contents?
What makes you believe it's being ignored?
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Harry Putnam wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org writes:
It looks like it's opening it just fine. So maybe there's a syntax
error in the file or something causing vim to ignore its contents?
What makes you believe it's being ignored?
You'd think it might be but if so then :so
Ché Kristo wrote:
When it comes to usability its sometimes good to think...what would Apple do?
I suspect Apple wouldn't let you login or do anything that doesn't have
a shiny button it, so login information wouldn't even be necessary (it's
a joke folks, laugh)
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
that the opensolaris sparc live cd cannot be booted from
for installation.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
are you aware of the fact that OpenSolaris is currently x86 only? SPARC
support seems to be planned for later this year, but is not there yet.
No longer true:
http://blogs.sun.com/dminer/entry/opensolaris_build_106_now_with
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
OpenSolaris 2008.x or 2009.x.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the command again using
pfexec
or otherwise increase your permissions.
Did you try running the command again using pfexec as indicated in the
error message?
pfexec pkg install IPSmc
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
Spoorthy Shankarmurthy wrote:
I tried pfexec pkg install IPSmc also ... Then also it gives the same kind of
error.
The same kind of error?
Can you please provide the exact output you receive when you type
pfexec pkg install IPSmc ?
--
Shawn Walker
not the same kind of error :)
What's the output of pkg authority ?
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. Move this:
Switch syntax highlighting on, when the terminal has colors
Also switch on highlighting the last used search pattern.
if t_Co 2 || has(gui_running)
syntax on
endif
...to the very bottom of your vimrc, and it will work (it did for me).
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
Express release
there is as well. That's why a public rsync service for mirroring is
provided.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I see that make comments
about all the packages we have :)
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
server to
query and obtain package information such as this.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
you.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
://www.infoworld.com/article/05/06/30/HNsparclaptop_1.html
And during all the years before, they could have used non-re-branded
Tapdole Laptops, an then also Nature Tech ones for a couple of years.
Ahem:
http://www.opensolaris.com/toshibanotebook/index.html
--
Shawn Walker
to file bugs at
http://defect.opensolaris.org or discuss them on pkg-discuss.
I believe you'll find the build 111a version of pkg (or the one
currently in the gate) to be significantly faster than the build 109 and
prior versions.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
bugzilla 7785
So basically all the same problems I have with my Sony Vaio and
OpenSolaris :)
None of those (except for the SSD bug possibly) would prevent me from
using the laptop.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[moving to pkg-discuss]
C. wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
As for inconsistencies in the manifest, that's pretty vague. Care to
discuss the specifics on pkg-discuss?
Look at the manifest.. You'll see that that some target= are trying to
create a symlink against a file which isn't there. (I
because they don't agree with the design or
implementation?
I can tell you with certainty that Sun works hard to ensure
contributions go upstream, it's ultimately less work for them and less
code to maintain.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris
C. wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
C. wrote:
Do you know how many patches Sun maintains for packages that are never
accepted by upstream because they don't agree with the design or
implementation?
I can tell you with certainty that Sun works hard to ensure
contributions go upstream, it's
C. wrote:
5) a secure package manager without any arbitrary post/pre-install
scripts
Ok.. so wait a second.. Let's first of all define secure because last
I checked the IPS authorities aren't signed.. Are they? You're only
They are not currently, but this is definitely planned
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Lurie y...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
...
The user side experience of IPS is no doubt very good but is no different
from a good Linux package manager like Smart/Yum (with the exception
of ZFS features). From a developer point of view these
Martin Bochnig wrote:
many other benefits. And you don't need to employ 50 engineers for 2
years to get a written-from-scratch monster like IPS going.
I'm not sure where you got this number from, but I think it's about 10x
greater than the reality :-) I'm sure the pkg(5) team would love to
casper@sun.com wrote:
DTrace ZFS SMF FMA BootAr IPS IA-Install
Incompatible? N N N N N Y Y
I think the many people screaming about quota support when it debuted a
few years ago, among many other decisions would beg to
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
Lurie wrote:
Yes.. writing an entire package manager from the
ground up is *less* work than maintaining the patches.
This is called moving forward, IPS is based on new novel ideas, a
secure package manager without any arbitrary post/pre-install scripts,
That's why
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
Lurie wrote:
That's why lots of packages deliver their own SMF service which runs only
once.
...which is better because those SMF scripts:
* can run at boot, which fits
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Lurie y...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
So modern Linux package managers do not have any of these qualities ?
Some of them ? Of course. All of them ? No. Just a few points:
1. They usually upgrade a live system (and while it's possible for some to do a
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Which means those packages will require system reboot not unlike
Windoze!
First, how else can you ensure the scripts correctly run without having the
new environment loaded
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And
I've also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it says
nothing, so I'm left confused.
How can I know if
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
That's really strange. Have you read
/usr/share/doc/aptitude/README?
currently pkg has very rudimentary search ability, like you can't ask
`which packages were installed only to satifsy other packages'
dependencies', `show me all games' or `which packages has arrived
Sebastien Roy wrote:
I was under the impression that an IPS package manifest contained the
set of services to be automatically imported and started as part of
package installation, or temporarily disabled during package upgrade,
etc. Where does one get the idea that a reboot is required for a
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
end ?. Do the benefits really outweigh the costs ? Even today the codebase is
significantly large and complex. We simply have to agree to disagree here.
Some things you'll never know unless you try; that's the cost of innovation.
We will indeed have to agree to
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
beadm is not hard to use even outside pkg(5), i've used it in the past
to for example have an alternate BE that is xen able
I never said it was hard to use, but obviously having a single command
to upgrade your entire system instead of a sequence of them is less
,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
an ip of 0.0.0.0 without a cable plugged in, I
plug an Ethernet cable and it remains at 0.0.0.0. I've tried
switching between auto and wired networks without success.
I know how to configure things manually, but I would prefer to do it
automatically.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
to configure things manually, but I would prefer to do it
automatically.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
from snv_86 to snv_92,
the zpool won't boot up?
The issue you speak of was a result of changes in the underlying boot
management libraries / grub and not of the pkg system.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
constructive.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
Quite frankly, your condescending tone and various, continued wild
assumptions whenever something doesn't work the way you want are unhelpful.
I would encourage you to find better usage of your time.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
something zfs-centred myself...
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-client
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
a
specific package; already filed as RFE 2713)
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
(realmente un anticuario). Mi idea es utilizarla, como conejillo de indias e
instalarle el Open Solaris, para cuando compre otra más moderna. ¿Se podrá hacer la
instalación?
Su computadora no tiene bastante memoria. La computadora necesita por lo
menos el mb 512.
Apesadumbrado.
--
Shawn Walker
, instale VirtualBox, y después
instale OpenSolaris dentro de él: http://www.virtualbox.org/
Lea más sobre OpenSolaris aquí: http://es.opensolaris.org/
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
virtuales que había instalado, con sus respectivos
errores. ¿Cómo se podrá corregir esto?
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=87892tstart=0
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-0.111
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
801 - 900 of 1390 matches
Mail list logo
