[Openstack] Does anybody know something about ceph.com unavailability?!

Hello! I know, it's not exactly OS question, but I think a lot of us using it with libvirt, and maybe somebody have info, cause I cannot reach download.ceph.com and ceph.com either for 3-4 days, and not found anything about this issue... Thanks, Peter

Re: [Openstack] Missed Domain tab

Please see the info here on things to watch for in the setup and common configuration issues: https://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/domain-support-horizon-here Thanks, Brad On 10/12/16, 10:47 AM, "Mindaugas" wrote: >Hello, > >After dashboard was installed (newton

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] [Swift] How to install Swift3 middleware?

No, I have only OpenStack Swift and Keystone. I used simple installation and configuration from this tutorials: http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/install-guide-rdo/ On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:44 PM, John van Ommen wrote: > Are you installing OpenStack from trunk? > > I've

Re: [Openstack] Does anybody know something about ceph.com unavailability?!

2016-10-12 20:18 GMT+02:00 Erdősi Péter : > Hello! > > I know, it's not exactly OS question, but I think a lot of us using it with > libvirt, and maybe somebody have info, cause I cannot reach > download.ceph.com and ceph.com either for 3-4 days, and not found anything > about this

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] [Swift] How to install Swift3 middleware?

On 13/10/16 06:26, Alexandr Porunov wrote: Hello, I want to use S3 api for Swift. I have installed swift3 as here: git clone https://github.com/openstack/swift3 cd swift3 python setup.py install Then I have configured my proxy-server.conf as here: [pipeline:main] pipeline = catch_errors

Re: [Openstack] Trove MySQL v5.[67] images?

On 12/10/16 21:53, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: Also, the bug I reported a few months ago (about hardcoded Security Groups) was also a problem. But in the meantime, I have to try to remember to go in and add a SG every time I add a DB.. Not ideal, but it will work for now.. I think you can avoid

Re: [Openstack] Trove MySQL v5.[67] images?

On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:12 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Hmm - so what error are you getting? For a long time i got problem with trove-guestagent not being able to connect to the RabbitMQ cluster I have. After a lot of trial and error I finally realized it must be the same cluster that Openstack

Re: [Openstack] Trove MySQL v5.[67] images?

On Oct 12, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > On Oct 11, 2016, at 10:12 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > >> Hmm - so what error are you getting? > > Which must be because I'm running an old guest agent.. I'm upgrading my > guest image at the moment. Oh, YEAH! Now working just fine (with a

[Openstack] [openstack] Prevent floating IP reassignment

Hi, I have a question regarding using the compute "action" API to assign a floating IP to a server (http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.1.html#addFloatingIp). Using the API call below [1], I am able to successfully assign a floating IP to a server, even if the floating IP is

[Openstack] [OpenStack] [Swift] How to install Swift3 middleware?

Hello, I want to use S3 api for Swift. I have installed swift3 as here: git clone https://github.com/openstack/swift3 cd swift3 python setup.py install Then I have configured my proxy-server.conf as here: [pipeline:main] pipeline = catch_errors gatekeeper healthcheck proxy-logging cache

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] [Swift] How to install Swift3 middleware?

Are you installing OpenStack from trunk? I've installed Swift3 on Helion Open Stack 2.0, and the published instructions didn't work for me at all. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Alexandr Porunov wrote: > Hello, > > I want to use S3 api for Swift. > > I have

[Openstack] Missed Domain tab

Hello, After dashboard was installed (newton release) - i could not find domain tab in a identity section. Domain appears in a login screen. Controller OS Centos 7.2. Issue or configuration problems? Thank you in advance. Pagarbiai /Best regards Mindaugas

[Openstack] [Swift] Where can I get the libshss library ?

Hello. I would like to ask question related to swift object storage node. I have set up swift object storage node following the installation guide and now finalizing the installation using the guide. http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/install-guide-rdo/swift-finalize-installation.html However, I

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Where can I get the libshss library ?

Unfortunately, no (as far as i know). It's a proprietary library used by NTT. However, if you update to the latest version of liberasurecode, that warning message is suppressed. --John On 12 Oct 2016, at 19:58, Yu Watanabe wrote: > Hello. > > I would like to ask question related to swift

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Where can I get the libshss library ?

Correct. Thanks John for your quick response. Kota (2016/10/13 12:14), John Dickinson wrote: > Unfortunately, no (as far as i know). It's a proprietary library used by NTT. > > However, if you update to the latest version of liberasurecode, that warning > message is suppressed. > > --John >

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] [Swift] How to install Swift3 middleware?

Hello, It still doesn't work... The same error is shown. Maybe I missed something? Maybe before the installation I had to done something or something else. I tried different things to run it. But when we do have swift3 or/and s3token in pipeline it doesn't work. Sincerely, Alexandr On Thu, Oct

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Where can I get the libshss library ?

Thank you for the response. I will check the latest liberasurecode (ver1.2.0). https://github.com/openstack/liberasurecode Best Regards, Yu Watanabe On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Kota TSUYUZAKI < tsuyuzaki.k...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Correct. Thanks John for your quick response. > > Kota

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] [Swift] How to install Swift3 middleware?

To me, the errors you're receiving are indicative of the swift3 package not installing correctly. When you ran that first step (setup.py), did you get errors? John On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Alexandr Porunov wrote: > Hello, > > It still doesn't work... The

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On 10/12/2016 05:01 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > I'd like to propose a plan on how to simultaneously extend the coverage of our > jobs and reduce their number. > > Currently, we're running one instance per job. This was reasonable when the > coreos-based IPA image was the default,

Re: [Openstack-operators] glance, nova backed by NFS

Are you backing both glance and nova-compute with NFS? If you're only putting the glance store on NFS you don't need any special changes. It'll Just Work. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Curtis wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Kris G. Lindgren >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Setting up to 3rd party CI OVB jobs

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 09:03 -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I wanted to propose a work item, that I am happy to spearhead, about >> setting up >> a 3rd party CI system for tripleo project. The work I am

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

Excerpts from Jaesuk Ahn's message of 2016-10-12 15:08:24 +: > It can be cheap if you are in the US. However, for Asia folks, it is not > that cheap considering it is all overseas travel. In addition, all-in-one > event like the current summit makes us much easier to get the travel fund > from

Re: [Openstack-operators] glance, nova backed by NFS

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:34 PM, James Penick wrote: > Are you backing both glance and nova-compute with NFS? If you're only > putting the glance store on NFS you don't need any special changes. It'll > Just Work. I've got both glance and nova backed by NFS. Haven't put up

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ubuntu package for Octavia

I highly recommend looking in to Giftwrap for that, until there's UCA packages. The thing missing from the packages that Giftwrap will produce is init scripts, config file examples, and the various user and directory setup stuff. That's easy enough to put into config management or a separate

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][horizon] keystone/horizon integration session in barcelona

This sounds great! Thanks for organising, Steve. Rob On 11 October 2016 at 22:32, Richard Jones > wrote: Thanks, Steve, this will be a valuable session! On 12 October 2016 at 08:14, Steve Martinelli

[openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as Octavia Core

+1 good choice! __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][ceph][nova] How do you handle Nova on Ceph?

Excerpts from Adam Kijak's message of 2016-10-12 12:23:41 +: > > > > From: Xav Paice > > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 8:41 PM > > To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators]

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as Octavia Core

That is quorum from the cores, welcome Lubosz! Michael On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote: > +1 > >> On Oct 10, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Brandon Logan >> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 13:06 -0700, Michael

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

On 14:50 Oct 12, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > One of the common complains about the existing project organization in the big > tent is that it's difficult to wrap our heads around the many projects there > are, their current state (in/out the big tent), their tags, etc. > > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [rpm-packaging][chef][puppet][salt][openstack-ansible][HA][tripleo][kolla][fuel] Schema proposal for config file handling for services

Thomas, Kolla does not use systemd fies (bifrost may be different here – I am not certain). Kolla also does not use default configuration files that are shipped with distros. We find this model to be disruptive to reliable development. I get distros want to ship them and that’s fine by us.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tricricle cleanning

Great, all patches are ready now for Tricircle cleaning: Review and Merge order: 1.central and local plugin for l3: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/378476/ 2. remove api gateway code: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/384182/ 3. security group support: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/380054/

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] devstack-plugin additional-pkg-repos: ocata summit working session?

On 12.10.2016 10:52, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 05:53:24PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 10/11/2016 02:09 PM, Markus Zoeller wrote: >>> * How to create a "*.deb" package out of the source code of >>> libvirt/qemu? (surprisingly enough, I'm still struggling with this)

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][gnocchi]gnocchi resource id has been SHA-1, How to find the resources belong to the monitored items?

On Wed, Oct 12 2016, 冯朝阳 wrote: > such as(The following example is used gnocchi version = 1.3 (L version)): > # gnocchi resource list > a23d72a8-6fa3-545a-8b66-e512cac3aea3 | instance_network_interface | > 12fc4501-8408-43b2-8cb7-6f1e1462d80e | 48d883ba-76d0-4e30-ac6b-ab85d1041c96 | >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG space request

Emilien Macchi wrote: > I would like to request for some space dedicated to TripleO project > for the first OpenStack PTG. > > https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ > > The event will happen in February 2017 during the next PTG in Atlanta. > Any feedback is welcome, Just a quick note: as you can

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Presence at PTG Atlanta in February

Masayuki Igawa wrote: > Hi Ken'ichi, > > Thanks for bring this up. > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi > wrote: >> Hi QA team, >> >> As you know, the first PTG(Project Teams Gathering) happens at Atlanta >> 20th-24th February the next year. >> After

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][gnocchi]gnocchi resource id has been SHA-1, How to find the resources belong to the monitored items?

On Wed, Oct 12 2016, 冯朝阳 wrote: > Thank you very much for your reply, Julien! > We are using the openstack version is liberty(gnocchi version=1.3), no > original_resource_id, Can you tell me what I should do? You should upgrade. :-) Indeed, this original_resource_id has been introduced after 1.3

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]agenda of weekly meeting Oct.12

Agenda of Oct.12 weekly meeting: # Ocata cycle design summit sessions: [1][2] # Atlanta PTG(project team gather) presence # release for stable/newton and tricircle cleaning # open discussion [1]https://www.openstack.org/summit/barcelona-2016/summit-schedule/global-search?t=Tricircle%3A

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] devstack-plugin additional-pkg-repos: ocata summit working session?

On 11.10.2016 16:09, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 02:09:33PM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > [Snip well-written backrgound detail] > >> Request >> --- >> My question is, if you have interest in this plugin and its >> capabilities, are you at the Summit in Barcelona and

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2016-10-12 06:42:43 +: > Tom, > > No flame, just observation about the reality of these changes. > > I think we missed this communication on the mailing list or in the FAQs or > somewhere else. I think most engineering-focused organizations

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Presence at PTG Atlanta in February

Hi Ken'ichi, Thanks for bring this up. On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi QA team, > > As you know, the first PTG(Project Teams Gathering) happens at Atlanta > 20th-24th February the next year. > After Barcelona, OpenStack Summit will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

Ed Leafe wrote: > Why do we need a week to nominate? Open it up a month before the election, > and close it a week before. Or open it for two days, and close it a week > before. I don’t understand why, other than procrastination, we need such a > long period. If you’re serious about serving,

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39:11PM -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Hello Tom, > > I must say I think this is bad news - especially for projects like > Kolla - ops centric. > One of reasons we created PTG in the first place is that Summit became > big and expensive, and project developers had

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Cross Project workshops in Barcelona including "Re-inventing the TC"

Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Please see the cross project schedule over at: > https://www.openstack.org/summit/barcelona-2016/summit-schedule/global-search?t=Cross%20Project%20workshops%3A Note that following the TC meeting yesterday, a small adjustment was pushed to fix a conflict for one of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Presence at PTG Atlanta in February

Thank you for clarifying Thierry! I got it! I'm looking forward to see the registration:) Best Regards, -- Masayuki Igawa On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 at 18:46 Thierry Carrez wrote: > Masayuki Igawa wrote: > > Hi Ken'ichi, > > > > Thanks for bring this up. > > > > On Tue, Oct 11,

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc][devstack][mitaka]

Hi Cathy, Thanks for your reply. I have the setup done without any errors with only one vm in the chain. I want to move all the icmp traffic from vm1 to vm3 via vm2. My Flow classifier looks like: "neutron flow-classifier-create --ethertype IPv4 --source-ip-prefix 10.0.0.18/32

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

hi, we introduced support for the deployment of Ceph in the liberty release so that it could optionally be used as backend for one or more of Cinder, Glance, Nova and more recently Gnocchi. We used to deploy Ceph MONs on the controller nodes and Ceph OSDs on dedicated ceph-storage nodes so

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Tricricle cleanning

Hello, patch for installation guide update of multi-node deployment has just been submitted. Here is the link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385306/ BR Zhiyuan On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 at 10:17 joehuang wrote: > Hello, Team, > > Understand this period is keeping us quite

Re: [openstack-dev] Event notification descriptors/schemas (? swagger ?)

On Tue, Oct 11 2016, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Has there been any ideas from folks to split those 'event_definitions.yaml' > into something else (a notifications schema repo?)? I'd be up for helping do > that (nice to have would be an included ability/code-gen(?) to turn those > schemas into code

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

On Wed, Oct 12 2016, Giulio Fidente wrote: > Also using Swift as backend for Glance and Gnocchi is enough to cover the > availability issue for the data, but it also means we're storing that data on > the controller nodes which might or might not be wanted; I don't see a strong > reason for

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] devstack-plugin additional-pkg-repos: ocata summit working session?

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 05:53:24PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/11/2016 02:09 PM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > > * How to create a "*.deb" package out of the source code of > > libvirt/qemu? (surprisingly enough, I'm still struggling with this) > > What version of libvirt / qemu are you trying

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][gnocchi]gnocchi resource id has been SHA-1, How to find the resources belong to the monitored items?

Hello All, When the ceilometer sent over the data to gnocchi, Gnocchi will use uuid.uuid5 for resource id, how to find it through the resource id belongs to the virtual machine, monitoring items? Will not be able to deal with resource id? such as(The following example is used gnocchi version

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

Qiming Teng wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39:11PM -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: >> One of reasons we created PTG in the first place is that Summit became >> big and expensive, and project developers had harder and harder time >> attending it due to budget issues. > > So a trip to PTG is

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

On 10/12/2016 11:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Qiming Teng wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:39:11PM -0500, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: One of reasons we created PTG in the first place is that Summit became big and expensive, and project developers had harder and harder time attending it due to

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][gnocchi]gnocchi resource id has been SHA-1, How to find the resources belong to the monitored items?

Thank you very much for your reply, Julien! We are using the openstack version is liberty(gnocchi version=1.3), no original_resource_id, Can you tell me what I should do? -- Original -- From: "Julien Danjou"; Date: Wed, Oct 12, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ansible][fuel][kolla][puppet][tripleo] proposed deadlines for cycle-trailing projects

Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2016-10-07 20:39:04 +: > Doug, > > We have already tagged rc1 long ago, but ack on rc2 (we are targeting 12th at > present) and ack on 20th for retag of final rc. We expect our rc2 to be > final. Right, I should have phrased that as a

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

Hi folks! I'd like to propose a plan on how to simultaneously extend the coverage of our jobs and reduce their number. Currently, we're running one instance per job. This was reasonable when the coreos-based IPA image was the default, but now with tinyipa we can run up to 7 instances (and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

On 10/12/2016 07:10 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: hi, we introduced support for the deployment of Ceph in the liberty release so that it could optionally be used as backend for one or more of Cinder, Glance, Nova and more recently Gnocchi. We used to deploy Ceph MONs on the controller nodes

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Clint Byrum wrote: So, while I do want to make sure enough of our architects and designers go to the summit to truly understand user needs, I also think it has been proven ineffective to also throw all of the coders into that mix and expect them to be productive. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2016-10-12 14:50:03 +0200: > Greetings, > > One of the common complains about the existing project organization in the big > tent is that it's difficult to wrap our heads around the many projects there > are, their current state (in/out the big tent),

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

  -Original Message- From: Chris Dent Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: October 12, 2016 at 09:10:45 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] ERROR: Not Authorized

You right the log files should be there. So i went back to start the exercise afresh, so run the stack.sh script again And i realised it didn't finish because the database password was wrong and also connection problems. So After successfully running the file. i can now create containers

[openstack-dev] [api] [searchlight] Duplicate parameter names

Hi, This issue came up during our meeting last week and it was suggested to ask the API working group for its opinion, so any comments welcome. Searchlight was born out of the Glance codebase, and so implemented "offset" and "limit" as paging parameters [1]. Where possible we've tried to map

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > hi, > > we introduced support for the deployment of Ceph in the liberty release so > that it could optionally be used as backend for one or more of Cinder, > Glance, Nova and more recently Gnocchi. > > We used to deploy

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Does anyone use the os-diagnostics API?

> On 12 Oct 2016, at 07:00, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > The current form of the nova os-diagnostics API is hypervisor-specific, which > makes it pretty unusable in any generic way, which is why Tempest doesn't > test it. > > Way back when the v3 API was a thing for

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Does anyone use the os-diagnostics API?

Hi Matt, Tim, Thanks for asking. We’ve used the API in the past as a way of getting the > usage data out of Nova. We had problems running ceilometer at scale and > this was a way of retrieving the data for our accounting reports. We > created a special policy configuration to allow authorised

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

Steve, Why just the one summit? Each cycle has a PTG and a summit, which makes 4 events per year. John From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"

Re: [openstack-dev] [Doc] Inclusion of microversion API support in CLI reference

We added this patch to the cinderclient: b76f5944130e29ee1bf3095c966a393c489c05e6 Which basically only shows help for the features available at the requested API version. It is by design. From: Sean McGinnis Sent: Wednesday, October 12,

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

Clint, RE 3 - I do understand purpose of PTGs. Prior many engineering orgs didn’t send many people to midcycles (where a lot of work got done – more so than summit even). The 3 events are 2 PTGS + 1 summit (although I don’t know the length of the PTGs) Regards -steve From: Clint Byrum

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

It can be cheap if you are in the US. However, for Asia folks, it is not that cheap considering it is all overseas travel. In addition, all-in-one event like the current summit makes us much easier to get the travel fund from the company, since the company only need to send everyone (tech, ops,

[Openstack-operators] OPNFV delivered its new Colorado release

Hi, I didn't see an official announcement, so I like to point you to the new release of OPNFV. https://www.opnfv.org/news-faq/press-release/2016/09/open-source-nfv-project-delivers-third-platform-release-introduces-0 OPNFV is an open source project and one of the most important users of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

I've been interacting recently with several new contributors (to Trove) and I can certainly attest to the fact that people appear to browse the source repository and read the README's. Flavio makes a good point that it would be good to provide a short summary of the project's capabilities in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG space request

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Emilien Macchi wrote: >> I would like to request for some space dedicated to TripleO project >> for the first OpenStack PTG. >> >> https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ >> >> The event will happen in February 2017 during the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ovn][neutron] networking-ovn 1.0.0 release (newton) -- port-security

Murali R wrote on 10/11/2016 01:47:24 PM: > From: Murali R > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > , discuss > Date: 10/11/2016 01:50 PM > Subject:

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] pypi mirrors out of sync

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:40:44PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:28:48PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > > Hi All, > > I know a lot of the infra team are in Germany for the sprint, howveer > > I'm > > see what seems like a lot of upper-constraint bumps that are failing

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][ansible][fuel][kolla][puppet][tripleo] proposed deadlines for cycle-trailing projects

Excerpts from Alexey Shtokolov's message of 2016-10-11 00:18:24 +0300: > Doug, > > We've finally fixed the blockers and tagged RC1 for all our repos. > We're going to have final RC this Friday (Oct14). > > Could I ask you to create stable/newton branches for repos: > - openstack/fuel-agent > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

On 12/10/2016 16:08, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2016-10-12 14:50:03 +0200: >> Greetings, >> >> One of the common complains about the existing project organization in the >> big >> tent is that it's difficult to wrap our heads around the many projects there >>

[openstack-dev] [sahara][qa] Unblocking Sahara gate

Hi all, the removal of the Sahara tests from Tempest [1] broke the tests now in sahara-tests, and basically I underestimated the fall-out of the removal. Apart from a minor issue due to the wrong exception [2], the key issue comes from the option groups in tempest.conf, which are defined as

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 10/12/2016 03:01 PM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > >> Hello Dmitry, >> >> Thanks for raising this question. I think the problem is deeper. There >> are a lot >> of use-cases that are not covered by our CI like cleaning,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

On 10/12/2016 06:10 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: hi, we introduced support for the deployment of Ceph in the liberty release so that it could optionally be used as backend for one or more of Cinder, Glance, Nova and more recently Gnocchi. We used to deploy Ceph MONs on the controller nodes and

[Openstack-operators] Ubuntu package for Octavia

Has anyone seen Ubuntu packages for Octavia yet? We’re running Ubuntu 16.04 with Newton, but for whatever reason I can not find any Octavia package… So far I’ve only found in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/HowToRun the following: Ubuntu Packages Setup: Install octavia with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On 10/12/2016 04:02 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi folks! I'd like to propose a plan on how to simultaneously extend the coverage of our jobs and reduce their number. Currently, we're running one instance per job.

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

On 12 October 2016 at 08:53, John Davidge wrote: > On 10/12/16, 11:18 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > >>On 10/12/2016 11:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> >>> PTGs happen in more cost-effective locations, airport hubs with cheaper >>> hotels, which should lower the cost of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi folks! > > I'd like to propose a plan on how to simultaneously extend the coverage of > our jobs and reduce their number. > > Currently, we're running one instance per job. This was reasonable when the > coreos-based

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On 10/12/2016 03:01 PM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: Hello Dmitry, Thanks for raising this question. I think the problem is deeper. There are a lot of use-cases that are not covered by our CI like cleaning, adoption etc... This is nice, but here I'm trying to solve a pretty specific problem: we can't

Re: [openstack-dev] PTG from the Ops Perspective - a few short notes

On 10/12/16, 11:18 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >On 10/12/2016 11:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> >> PTGs happen in more cost-effective locations, airport hubs with cheaper >> hotels, which should lower the cost of attending. Yes, I'm pretty sure >> traveling to Atlanta downtown for a week will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

Top-posting as I'll try to summarize/re-start/reword/whatever the right word is, this thread: It seems to me that the problem we're trying to solve here is how we can help voters to make more thoughtful choices (note that I'm not saying they currently don't. I'm not judging the voters but, as

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [magnum] Subjects to discuss during the summit

On 10/10/16 11:11, Spyros Trigazis wrote: 4. Finally, a thought under investigation is replacing the nodes one by one using a different image. e.g. Upgrade from fedora 24 to 25 with new versions of packages all in a new qcow2 image. How could we update the stack for this? This should

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

On 10/12/2016 02:29 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: On 10/12/2016 07:10 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: hi, we introduced support for the deployment of Ceph in the liberty release so that it could optionally be used as backend for one or more of Cinder, Glance, Nova and more recently Gnocchi. We used

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][ceph][nova] How do you handle Nova on Ceph?

> > From: Xav Paice > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 8:41 PM > To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][ceph][nova] How do > you handle Nova on Ceph? > > On Mon, 2016-10-10

[openstack-dev] [all][tc] Exposing project team's metadata in README files

Greetings, One of the common complains about the existing project organization in the big tent is that it's difficult to wrap our heads around the many projects there are, their current state (in/out the big tent), their tags, etc. This information is available on the governance website[0].

[openstack-dev] [Doc] Inclusion of microversion API support in CLI reference

Just getting this out there to either get educated or to start a conversation... While going through some of the DocImpact generated bugs for python-cinderclient I noticed a few that added new parameters to existing CLI commands. As Cinder has now moved to using microversions for all API changes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

Hello Dmitry, Thanks for raising this question. I think the problem is deeper. There are a lot of use-cases that are not covered by our CI like cleaning, adoption etc... The main problem is that we need to change ironic configuration to apply specific use-case. Unfortunately tempest doesn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [infra] RFC: consolidating and extending Ironic CI jobs

On 10/12/2016 03:54 PM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Dmitry Tantsur > wrote: On 10/12/2016 03:01 PM, Vasyl Saienko wrote: Hello Dmitry, Thanks for raising this question. I think the problem is

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][ceph][nova] How do you handle Nova on Ceph?

> ___ > From: Abel Lopez > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 9:57 PM > To: Adam Kijak > Cc: openstack-operators > Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][ceph][nova] How do > you handle Nova on Ceph? > > Have you thought

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] pypi mirrors out of sync

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:28:48PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi All, > I know a lot of the infra team are in Germany for the sprint, howveer I'm > see what seems like a lot of upper-constraint bumps that are failing due to > mirrors being out of sync. This seem to have happened again. In

Re: [openstack-dev] [elections][tc]Thoughts on the TC election process

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:09 PM Sean Dague wrote: > On 10/03/2016 12:46 PM, Edward Leafe wrote: > > > > > We are fortunate in that all of the candidates are exceptionally > well-qualified, and those elected have put in excellent service while on > the TC. But one thing I'm afraid

[Openstack-operators] [nova] Does anyone use the os-diagnostics API?

The current form of the nova os-diagnostics API is hypervisor-specific, which makes it pretty unusable in any generic way, which is why Tempest doesn't test it. Way back when the v3 API was a thing for 2 minutes there was work done to standardize the diagnostics information across virt

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][ceph][nova] How do you handle Nova on Ceph?

If fault domain is a concern, you can always split the cloud up into 3 regions, each having a dedicate Ceph cluster. It isn't necessarily going to mean more hardware, just logical splits. This is kind of assuming that the network doesn't share the same fault domain though. Alternatively, you can

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova New Contributor Update

During the Newton Design Summit the Nova team had a session regarding new contributor activities (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-getting-started). We agreed that we should update the Mentoring wiki page (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mentoring) with a list of projects and

Re: [openstack-dev] [lbaas] [octavia] Proposing Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as Octavia Core

+1 > On Oct 10, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Brandon Logan > wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 13:06 -0700, Michael Johnson wrote: >> Greetings Octavia and developer mailing list folks, >> >> I propose that we add Lubosz Kosnik (diltram) as an OpenStack Octavia >>

  1   2   >