is definitely a step in right direction.
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:47:18AM +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 24/02/15 08:57 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 24/02/15 04:38
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgptQEMMqF1o_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpFaVXWQm9Ii.pgp
Description: PGP signature
proposed this several times already and I still think some
consistency here is worth it. I'd vote to enable logging on all
channels.
Fla.
P.S: Join the open side of the force #badumps
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp6m7o2MC6PB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
channel for core
reviewers to hangout together. For the later, I don't think there's a
use case.
I'm not arguing on the general use case for a private IRC channel, I'm
arguing on the need of such channels for a specific set of core
reviewers.
Fla.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpnqFoZzBFvF.pgp
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpWOvxKuDDsl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpG0w9koZfZg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
can make it clean if we
leverage the different Python modules (httplib etc.)
Regards,
Jordan
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 13/02/15 16:01 +0100, Jordan Pittier wrote:
What is the difference between just calling the Glance API
?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpjSAiiBxRsN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpMnOREag89a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev
for bringing this up,
Flavio
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/02/15 13:42 -0800, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
I recently proposed a change to glance to turn the file-backed scrubber
queue
files into JSON: https://review.openstack.org/#/c
/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpGzwquQzdzL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
on this. Flexibility is good on holiday seasons, during
feature freeze, etc.
+2 to the above, I like it.
Thanks again,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp4MX9MUQ9fE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing
continue work on all abandoned patches that are
covering
valid use cases and finish them?
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 13/02/15 11:06 +, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
Hi all,
We have almost
can do to help?
I'd say, feel free to propose a patch to remove it. Please, file a bug
for this so we can track it.
Thanks,
Flavio
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/02/15 09:34 -0800, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
Yeah, that commit
On 12/02/15 12:04 +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
The important bit, thoguh, is that email is meant for asynchronous
communication and IRC isn't. If things that require the intervention
of other folks from the community are being discussed and those folks
On 12/02/15 01:41 -0800, Nikhil Manchanda wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
[...]
## Keep discussions open
I don't believe there's anything wrong about kicking off some
discussions in private channels about specs/bugs. I don't believe
there's
On 11/02/15 09:37 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Stefano Maffulli's message of 2015-02-11 06:14:39 -0800:
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 10:55 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
This email is dedicated to the openness of our community/project.
It's good to have a reminder every now and then. Thank
the courage to participate in public discussion and
engaging with the community.
There, I said it, and I said it in the open.
And I infinitely thank you for this.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpu_UbK5FTb3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpgi8R3xMssL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for surfacing this issue and keeping this conversation in the
open.
-amrith
--
Amrith Kumar, CTO Tesora (www.tesora.com)
Twitter: @amrithkumar
IRC: amrith @freenode
| -Original Message-
| From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com]
| Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 3:06 AM
On 11/02/15 11:24 +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
During the last two cycles, I've had the feeling that some of the
things I love the most about this community are degrading and moving
to a state that I personally disagree with. With the hope of seeing
sub-community. You don't need to be
core-reviewer or PTL to do so. Speak up and help keeping the community
as open as possible.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpTvB183mNNf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpr_gMfrvih_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
as open as possible.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
Thanks Flavio!
I'd like to add couple general extra thoughts here:
1) Summit sessions seems to be the ultimate decision making ... I see constantly references to
summit sessions as decided or not open to discussion anymore. So much
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpnc_PEFy9KP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp7v874u54Bf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
On 14/01/15 05:46 -0700, Boden Russell wrote:
On 1/14/15 1:38 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 13/01/15 21:24 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 01/13/2015 04:55 PM, Boden Russell wrote:
Looking for some feedback from the glance dev team on a potential BP…
This is the solution that I would recommend
/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpv3A6hG5r81.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSTIBS8VTg9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the infra team, requirement's cores, etc.
What python-clients are you referring to? Are you referring to libs
that live in stackforge or dependencies for things that live in
stackforge?
Do you have an (or many) example?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgps2sjt5rSu5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpQWSgWiNTyI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
that IRC channels are typically not
private and are likely already logged by dozens of people anyway.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Christopher Aedo ca...@mirantis.com
mailto:ca...@mirantis.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com
On 09/01/15 15:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[huge snip]
What do you think ? Could that work ? If not, do you have alternate
suggestions ?
Love it! Thanks for the thoughtful and detailed email.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp2LB9GMnSpn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpq0Ec4GfNbo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
/python-keystoneclient/blob/41afe3c963fa01f61b67c44e572eee34b0972382/keystoneclient/auth/conf.py#L49
[2]
https://github.com/openstack/keystonemiddleware/blob/master/keystonemiddleware/auth_token.py#L356
[3] https://review.openstack.org/143063
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpZwjK8HSrg1.pgp
On 19/12/14 09:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 19, 2014, at 7:17 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
DISCLAIMER: The following comments are neither finger pointing the
author of this work nor the keystone team.
RANT: We should really stop assuming everyone is using
list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpOyzMXNqoky.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpR5xEchxz6w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1egx0cInqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpHOlfFCTHsb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
Thanks for your consideration and the hard work, Erno and Alex!
+2A
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpD0rOoQ2Ei4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
it easier for contributors to join in, and seems consistent with
the direction of OpenStack as a whole.
Lets get rid of it, once and for all.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpYWQLd7puPx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 21/11/14 14:13 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Nov 21, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21/11/14 12:07 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
We have a bit of a backlog in the Oslo review queue. Before we add a bunch of
new reviews for Kilo work, I’d like to see if we can
of
cross-project issues on the agenda. Let me know on this thread if that
sounds like a good idea, and we'll make the final call at next week
meeting :)
+1 :-)
This sounds like a good idea.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp5ulVWt7car.pgp
Description: PGP signature
adoption be listed there?
I've a spec[0] for glanceclient and I'll work on the glance_store one
now.
[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133485/
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpmPWgBJiwpY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev
.
Unfortunately, this is not possible now and I don't think it'll be
possible until L (or even M?).
FWIW, I think the use case you've mentioned is useful and it's
something we have in our TODO list.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgps0pmEesXKz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpn13I7KvWyK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp2FcMW9czH6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
projects - zaqar
- to jump in and help testing the storyboard? I'm happy to give it a
try.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpIegOxUfxSz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
/
[1] http://qpid.apache.org/components/cpp-broker/index.html
[2] http://qpid.apache.org/components/dispatch-router/index.html
[3] http://qpid.apache.org/components/messenger/index.html
[4] http://qpid.apache.org/components/protocol-engine/index.html
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpZKlDHkeZRA.pgp
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpZL8Fz3bsjL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman
list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp5tTZfl8cnC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On 18/11/14 18:46 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 18/11/14 11:42 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
With storyboard.openstack.org http://storyboard.openstack.org looming
on the horizon, should such an effort be put on the back burner for now?
I don't expect integrated
/migrate-to-topics.rst,cm
[1] http://blog.flaper87.com/post/people-dont-like-to-queue-up/
Thoughts? Feedback?
Thanks in advance,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpvnbHdHMkNe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
for volunteers every meeting/cycle/etc
The above doesn't solve the problme completely but just like reviews,
it'd be an optional, completely opt-in process that people can sign up
for.
Thoughts?
Flavio
[0] https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-April/003668.html
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
for bringing this up and for updating your patches, I know it's
a pain and I appreciate your collaboration there.
Cheers,
Flavio
P.S: Gentle note. Oslo is not an acronym.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpHpum198hgM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack
Flavio Percoco
pgpW7NsATDPbZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
not using oslo.config in oslo.messaging.
Looking forward to have more feedback on this point, I unfortunately
missed this session because I had to attend another one.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpkNq0wtkvFS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack
for joining our sessions last week,
Looking forward for the upcoming and already promissing 6 months,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgprXb1RgMatt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
commit message guideline:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GitCommitMessages
Thanks for all the hard work,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp3F148Kw5Pg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
to it that you'd like
to discuss during the meeting.
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Zaqar
Looking forward to see you there,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpb1AB4BYQS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
when the library was created.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpSiUeIcuJD6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 11/11/14 11:45 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 11/11/14 11:06 +0100, Alan Pevec wrote:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1391437 and marked it as Critical.
ok, so current issue is a bug for both master and stable/juno but I'd
still like glance_store backward compatibility be clarified
On 30/10/14 12:25 -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 10/23/2014 04:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Oct 23, 2014, at 2:56 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/22/2014 08:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The application projects are dropping python 2.6 support during Kilo, and I’ve
had
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpfEdNA4EhNh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
correctly?
Or, are you suggesting to get rid of glance's API entirely and instead
have it in the form of a library and everything would be handled by
the middleware you have in your diagram?
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp1eRLkbOF_A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgpJKR8bOPu2l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/10/14 21:23 +0100, Philip Cheong wrote:
Hi all,
In preparation of the OpenStack Summit in Paris next week, I'm hoping
to speak
to some people in the OpenStack foundation about the benefits of a
partnership
there, right? Any chance we can enable this?
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
point release is, which I
don't think has been settled quite yet).
Agreed! I think this is a safer and easier way to drop support for py26
in Oslo. Otherwise, I think we'll have to fight with backports, pinned
versions and whatnot.
Thoughts?
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
On 10/24/2014 03:29 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
On 09:11 Thu 23 Oct , Flavio Percoco wrote:
According to the use-cases explained in this thread (also in the emails
from John and Mathieu) this is something that'd be good having. I'm
looking forward to seeing the driver completed.
As John
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
of the projects just to keep the process simpler.
Probably longer but hopefully simpler.
I'm sure I'm missing something so please, correct me here.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On 10/22/2014 04:46 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Replied in inline.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana
On 10/23/2014 08:56 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 10/22/2014 08:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The application projects are dropping python 2.6 support during Kilo, and
I’ve had several people ask recently about what this means for Oslo. Because
we create libraries that will be used by stable
of it - with a deprecation period, I guess - and
giving it another chance in the future when it can be fully implemented.
[0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/glance-cinder-driver
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/32864/
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote:
Greetings,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
Greetings,
Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver was merged
in Glance to provide an easier and hopefully more consistent interaction
be traveling. The second reason is that in our second time
slot, we can also have Fei Long joining us.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Zaqar#Next_meeting
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev
can eliminate the
burden of maintaining special 3.3 test infrastructure.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
for
drivers implementations.
Thanks for bringing it up,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 10/06/2014 08:58 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 10/06/2014 12:38 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
On 10/03/2014 12:16 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 10/03/2014 05:38 PM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
Candidate proposals for the Technical Committee positions (6 positions)
are now open and will remain open until 05
. The request of
the liaison to be a core reviewer is more a suggestion for the projects
themselves in order to make the interaction between both teams easier.
That said, we could probably re-word that somehow to reflect the above.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
.
By requesting docs on reviews, we'll encourage people to write docs
right away next time.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
: Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
Reply-To: fla...@redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat
To: openst...@lists.openstack.org
Greetings,
I'm reaching out to see if anyone is using Glance's GridFS store driver
and has any feedback. The driver has been updated with the latest API
changes but no fixes
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/047114.html
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
with all the above!
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
of the highlights of the project for me.
Thanks for all your hard work, Mark. You did a great job and I hope
you'll still be around.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
+1
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
it.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/24/2014 12:06 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/23/2014 05:13 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Joe Gordon's message of 2014-09-22 19:04:03 -0700:
[snip
On 09/24/2014 07:07 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Sorry for the vague subject[1]. I just wanted to commend Flavio Percoco
and the Zaqar team for maintaining poise and being excellent citizens
of OpenStack whilst being questioned intensely by the likes of me,
and others.
And I'd personally like
on recovering them.
[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/zaqar/+bug/1372335
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-April/007650.html
Cheers,
Flavio
P.S: again, sorry for all the late and mixed replies, email disaster
happened and I'm working on recovering it.
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
agree that if FIFO's reality in Zaqar changes, it'll likely
be towards the option (1).
Thanks for your feedback,
Flavio
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Flavio Percoco [fla...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 5:58 AM
To: openstack-dev
for the project, team and the rest of the
ecosystem.
Thanks for reading,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
technically possible, I'm saying
these 2 projects have different goals, visions and scope, hence they
weren't merged nor they will.
Cheers,
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
On 09/22/2014 11:04 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/22/2014 08:00 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
oslo messaging is highly tight to AMQP semantics whereas Zaqar is not.
The API for oslo.messaging is actually quite high level and could easily
be mapped to different messaging technologies
701 - 800 of 1094 matches
Mail list logo
