I do not know if this is relevant. I ordered some prints for my A80 at
Costco few days ago, 9 matt prints 8 gloss prints, all 4x6. The matt
prints appear a little diffused but not soft. Colour is not as vivid as
good quality traditional prints, but still pretty good. However, those gloss
Shel Belinkoff schrieb:
snip
One of my all time favorites is APX 100 @ 64 EI souped in Rodinal 1:100 for abt 15
minutes. And, of course, APX 25 @ EI 12-15 souped in
a similar manner.
Yep,
but it's a shame, they don't make APX 25 anymore.
I've done a lot of microphotography on aPX25
on 22.01.04 23:23, lazarus at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A. The MicroDrives, if so which brand as I've seen and IBM and maybe one
other.
They are quite delicate, you have to handle them with care. Also they are
slower than fast CFs, and startup time of *istD will be 3-4 s. instead of 1
s.
OR
Hi!
AC For the 2nd pic, I think I would handle the camera with the grip downward to
AC avoid the flash shadow.
J His expression is really one of a guy at ease and enjoying himself.
J Framing and focus is very nice too, imo.
Alan, Jostein, you both seem to like the second of the two.
Please,
on 23.01.04 2:33, Paul Stenquist at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using the Lexar 1 gig CF card? I see BH offers it for $299.
You'd better buy Sandisk Ultra II or Extreme cards - they are simply faster
on *istD:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-6432
--
Best Regards
There is really nothing wrong with the 1st one, just that the 2nd one shows
more character about the person. But I am really poor at people photography
so don't take my word for it. :-)
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Alan, Jostein, you both seem to like the second of the two.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Peter Alling wrote:
I assume that you've already checked Boz's site to see what Pentax
Not clever; I hadn't. Thanks for the wake up call.
I now have and cannot see what the principle of focusing is for the 2
available models. If it's matte, I don't have much reason to
Have a read, Seems like Kodaks claims are nothing more
than excuses to why they can't compete.
http://www.ephotozine.com/pp/news/fullnews.cfm?NewsID=1476
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Apparently SharpRaw has now added *istD support.
A trial version is available here:
http://www.logicaldesigns.com/Imaging1.htm
but unfortunately it won't save anything until a license has been
purchased.
Will be looking at it tonight...
Thanks, will do. Does the instruction manual explains the upgrade
process? Does the camera come with a USB or firewire cable?
On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Bill Owens wrote:
Paul,
When it arrives, make sure it has the firmware upgrade. Since the
upgrade
has only been available for a week or
They have an affiliate programme for providing their AdWords banner ads
to third-party websites - https://www.google.com/adsense/
S
Herb Chong wrote:
i doubt that. Google is very expensive.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
It's possible to get bullets that travel at subsonic velocity. They
make less noise. Even supersonic ones are not that fast, I think.
700 mph is quite fast! The reason I thought about it was that one of
my friends has discovered rats in her garden. I toyed with the idea of
getting a
i've had mine for about a month. the Shadow/Highlight adjustment and the
File Browser are very nice to use. the RAW import is good for me too because
i still shoot the Nikon sometimes and i have many RAW files from it too.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
that contradict's all financial analysts view on Fuji's position. they see
Fuji having done worse than Kodak with respect to film sales.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:05 AM
Subject: fuji claims
We have a Pentax F 50mm f2.8 macro, and it is without
a doubt the sharpest lens here, although we don't have
any * or limited lenses to compare it to.
I'd say the main use for such a short focal length
macro would be for copying flat art, documents, other
photos, etc.
It's seen little use in the
I can see how we've slipped into guns from photography -- but why?
I've never heard of a .25 air rifle and rats will not get out of the way
in time from either a .177 or .22 air rifle. Further discussion should be
carried on off-list I think.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
Ads are not the technology. you have no control over what they put up. i've
licensed Google for my company. they decide if they want to deal with you
and they set a price ahead of time with no negotiation. if they don't want
to deal with you, it doesn't matter how much you can pay.
Herb
-
I just got an SFXn as part of a bundle and realised that this camera
takes interchangeable screens. I am not at all familiar with these
accessories; are they still made today? Are they Pentax-only and/or
Pentax-made only? How much do they go for?
Hi,
I have posted a long message about all
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those were photos from Doc Edgerton's lab at MIT.
They used some good size flash tubes, and
I believe a microphone was used to trigger the flash.
Polaroid film and open the shutter, fire the gun,
which triggers the flash, and you see where the bullet is.
Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 14:47:07 -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If they stop making Kodachrome
Not if, when.
I give it two years at the outside.
Unfortunately I probably agree with you. I just want 18 megapixles
before then.
I've just looked at the message I sent half an hour ago about air rifles and
rats. The font seems to have changed to Cyrillic for some strange reason and
'by the way' is in 'Russian'. I've never seen anything like this before. I
typed in 'by the way' last, by the way.
Don
___
Dr E D F
I, too, like the beer shot more than the pool table shot.
The man at the pool table has a facial expression that makes
me wonder what he's doing. On the other hand, maybe thats
the point of it. The finger on the ball is a nice touch,
though.
-Lon
Jostein wrote:
Jostein,
No offense taken or meant...
I'm just worried/frustrated as the PUG is still down on this side of the pond.
Anybody know what the problem is? ...or do we have to move somewhere else?
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Didn't mean to patronize anyone, Bob. Sorry if you felt that
Kostas,
The two additional screens for the SFXn/SF1n are matte focus.
I've got the grid screen that Boz shows.
The other is a microscope screen.
They both lack a split image aide since this was Pentax's 1st(2nd) autofocus
camera.
If you want the aide, use the beep or visual focus confirmation
The camera comes with a USB cable, and no the instruction manual does not
explain the upgrade process. It's pretty simple though and can be done by
downloading the upgrade to a CF card from your computer, and then uploading
it to the camera. Drop me an email off list if you need help, but I
On 22 Jan 2004 at 21:45, Bill Owens wrote:
Bet you were shooting RAW. I shoot max jpg.
Yep, and I would have filled it sooner shooting TIFF.
I wish 4GB cards weren't so costly.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax SMC 40mm f2.8 pancake lens for sale. Good condition, light
wear on the aperture ring. Rear cap and front clear filter included.
Great small lens. Makes a pocketable go anywhere camera out of an MX
or similar.
$150 shipped in United States. Outside the US we can work something out.
Probably an air rifle pellet would still be in the barrel if you used a this
method.
Bill
I'd have thought a fairly simple switch activated mechanically by the
movement of the trigger would be a lot easier.
--
Cheers,
Bob
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want the aide, use the beep or visual focus confirmation in the finder.
I am not sure it's as good as the split screen for macro, which is why
I am priming the ME Super for this (but it's not TTL flash and thus
does not exploit the
Mark,
Doc Edgerton was an early electrical engineer, in Dynamo Engineering I
believe. He developed the flash to help freeze the spinning machinery for a good
look. In the hall outside his lab there were some of his early photos,
including Ariel Recon photos of Boston taken in the late '30's.
Bill, I second Pats comments about your gallery. Sure
looks like your in the DOE.
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 20:43:48 -0800, P Kong wrote:
At 07:12 PM 1/22/2004, Bill Sawyer wrote:
Try the Zoo, too, Paul. The Wildlife Photo Exhibit is
held over for another
month, and they have 3 tiger cubs, about
I have tried to do some ping scans and stuff. Within the IP range that the PUG
server resides, it's just that particular address that doesn't respond.
From this side it looks like it's something on the local server that has
failed...
Jostein
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jostein,
No offense
Can the AF 400T flash be used with the *ist D. Can it be used in TTL
mode? Can it be used in TTL mode with K or M lenses?
Paul
Bob wrote:
I'm speaking from a position of almost total ignorance here, but
surely a bullet is travelling 2 or 3 times faster than sound? Over the
short distances involved is it really possible to do this?
bullet velocities can vary between 700 fps and 2300 fps for common guns.
There are other
Got slightly bad news for you, The *istD has a problem with TTL flash
metering. It tends to be off about 1 or more stops with any TTL flash.
To minimize the problem, set the ISO to 400 as there has been some
speculation on the board that it works best there. Also, I've been using
an auto-flash
For 22 cal. rifle and air rifle there are small commercial bullet traps available
at low cost, less than $50. They do an excellent job containing the bullets.
A switch on the trigger worked for me.
Bob wrote:
I'm speaking from a position of almost total ignorance here, but
surely a bullet
I know there's a thread about this already, but just as a FYI, the PUG is
unreachable from Winnipeg, Canada, too. I get the following message:
Gateway Timeout. The following error occurred: [code=GATEWAY_TIMEOUT] A
gateway timeout occurred. The server is unreachable. Retry the request.
On Thursday, Jan 22, 2004, at 13:16 America/New_York, tom wrote:
I use Kodak lens wipes.
They come in 135 and 220 sizes?!
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Tom Reese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff asked: BUT ... I was wondering how many here
still use Kodak as their primary source
C'mon ... there are enough istd shooters on this list to provide some sort
of comparison, or certainly a comment or two. If macro mode is
inappropriate for some reason (it just happened to be what was handy at
the moment my curiosity was piqued) another photo could be substituted,
perhaps a
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Mark Roberts wrote:
Juey Chong Ong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, Jan 22, 2004, at 13:16 America/New_York, tom wrote:
I use Kodak
- Original Message -
From: josvdh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Group,
Why are new camera's still equiped with first and second curtain sync?
Is there any use for first curtain sync?
To freeze action without a trailing blur.
Christian
I'll test it when I get home tonight.
BTW, what were the f-stop, (sorry for this... but I don't know how else to
word it...) 35mm focal length equivalent and ISO setting? Did you use
flash? A tripod or copy stand? Is the section full-size? Is that a new 20
or an old one? Better yet, why don't
My experience with the *istD and the AF360 has been more of
problem. With the FA20-35 I'm getting 2 stop underexposure
with the lens at 23mm or less and close to normal exposure
above that. I've seen erratic under and over exposure with
my FA50 and the AF360. I've had better results with the
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
C'mon ... there are enough istd shooters on this list to provide some sort
of comparison, or certainly a comment or two.
I thought you would be thanking me for giving you another reason to
buy it, Shel. I was just trying to help you make the decision.
OK, 1. You did not have the camera level. If it was the subject would have been
leaning slightly forward into the frame, as it is he is leaning back slightly
and it give the view a teetery feeling almost with out knowing why. If you had
errored in the other direction it would not have been so
on 23.01.04 17:53, David Sprinkle at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My experience with the *istD and the AF360 has been more of
problem. With the FA20-35 I'm getting 2 stop underexposure
with the lens at 23mm or less and close to normal exposure
above that. I've seen erratic under and over
Hi Christian ... I think all you'd need to know is here. Ti highlight your
specific questions:
Exposures F 5.6 @ 1/40 second hand held
ISO 100
Focal length 13.90 mm (about 70mm equivalent)
No flash
What you see is a full sized section of a large sized, lowest rez
JPEG straight
LOL Well, truth is, I am looking for a reason to buy it ...
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I thought you would be thanking me for giving you another reason to
buy it, Shel. I was just trying to help you make the decision.
Hi all
FA 28-80 f£.5-4.5 macro zoom exc. condition [ex Rob Studdert!] $
80
49mm rectangular clip on hood for 35mm and 28mm wide angles [case] $
20
Me super winder , works great, batter tray won't stay in
$ 20
mx/me super diopters +1 +2 +1.5
Just got this from kodak. They obviously want to know how many pros are
taking up digital and how fast they are abandoning film. I guess now
they have planned dropping many of the consumer films, they are looking
at the better ones too!
Don't know if people will be able to access the
what about the 20?
;-)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Unretouched and unmanipulated
Hi Christian ... I think all you'd need to know is
On 22/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Wow, Jerome, are you in for a suprise at GFM.
Hint: Adelheid's not a he. She is however a very nice person.
I was gonna say!
http://www.macads.co.uk/pdml/pdmlpics/groupa.html
She's a lovely lady - and a German with a good sense of humour to boot...
So, this is not a real Domke, but an imitation ... correct?
Brand new Domke F803 black bag [copy] [...] $65
Here's the full file should you have need for it:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/20s.jpg
Hi Christian ... I think all you'd need to know is here. To highlight your
specific questions:
Exposures F 5.6 @ 1/40 second hand held
ISO 100
Focal length 13.90 mm (about 70mm
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, graywolf wrote:
4. More subtilely the shot lacks the dynamic look that would indicate the
intensity to go with his expression. Also he is obviously has his attention on
something out of the frame but no indication of what.
The first bit I don't understand, but did not
I've tried to reach Igor, but the whole server is down, so no mails to him
are possible either.
I am sure they know that the server is down and are working on it.
I think the hardware crashed. And since they are a nonprofit organisation it
will take time to reestablish the service.
Moving to
I got the same thing, it would seem they should have sent thing out about 2
years ago.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kodak examining pro-usage of film too?
Just got this
It's back in circulation already LOL
Christian wrote:
what about the 20?
;-)
One last time before these go on ebay...
Bogen/Manfrotto 486 compact ball head, used a couple of times but
looks/works like new. $30
KM with a 50mm f/2 and a flaky meter. $40
I take personal checks and Paypal.
Amita
On 23/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'd have thought a fairly simple switch activated mechanically by the
movement of the trigger would be a lot easier.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Probably an air rifle pellet would still be in the barrel if you used a this
method.
Bill
But wouldn't
On 22/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Well, I sold about $1200 worth of screwmount lenses in the last few
days along with my Spotmatic Motor Drive, so I ordered an *ist D.
Paul, I would be very interested to read your comments after a week with
the camera, and especially after a few big
On 22/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
A. The MicroDrives, if so which brand as I've seen and IBM and maybe one
other.
OR
B. CF, I've seen that these have some of Accelaration feature which the
*ist D has support for.
Personally I wouldn't touch a microdrive. CF all the way for me. They say
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Also, would the balls and face be in focus if shooting at f2?
Now I'm scared to open this photo. :)
chris
Bill, the first deer is really good.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Tom Reese wrote:
I will try to do this in daylight with flash equipment set relatively close
to the target for maximum power. My camera will be a bit further away with a
telephoto lens (I don't want splattered fruit all over my lens!). I thought
I'd stop the lens down to f/22 and shoot
On 23/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I have tried to do some ping scans and stuff. Within the IP range that
the PUG
server resides, it's just that particular address that doesn't respond.
From this side it looks like it's something on the local server that has
failed...
Jostein
Hi mate,
On 23/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Hey, if the cards are such a good deal, if shooting digital
is such a good deal, there should be no hesitancy in getting
as many cards as you can afford and shooting at the highest
resolution possible. And of course, if need be, some kind
of portable
--- Amita,
I'm interested. Is it a quick release style? Would
it be too small for 2021 legs?
Bogen/Manfrotto 486 compact ball head, used a couple
Thanks,
=
jmb `:^)
On 23/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Dear Group,
Why are new camera's still equiped with first and second curtain sync?
Is there any use for first curtain sync?
Just curious...
Greetings, Jos
Could be useful to shoot fill flash on a car going backwards?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
But wouldn't large(ish) calibre bullets make a mess of what you're trying
to photograph - depending on subject, of course? If it was an egg, for
instance, wouldn't an air gun pellet make a more interesting shot than a
.22 round? Not my cup of tea, just procrastinating. I
Yes, I am glad that I saw the photo before I read that.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 11:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: As usual: photo advise
Here are some Euros (worth slightly more...)
*ist D and F 1.4/50, about the same scale, *** JPEG:
http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/euros.jpg
Sven
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2004 17:07
An: PDML
Betreff:
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the same thing, it would seem they should have sent thing out about 2
years ago.
I would *expect* the pro films to go away sooner than the consumer-grade
stuff.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
You know, I've a shot online with my kids and their bikes...:
http://community.webshots.com/photo/93489626/94582233SJySpG
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: OT: People and Their
Kostas,
The split screen can help you get a specific item/area in precise focus, but I find
the ground glass matte image most useful in judging static compositions. Use the
depth of field preview as well.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Paul,
Having 2 AF400T's myself, I can vouch for the fact that it can be used
in TTL. There seems to be a bit of the unevenness in exposure that
has been mentioned. It seems to be more of an issue with digital
rather than this particular combination. TV and others have mentioned
it in
I love the display in the hallway. His water going up hill trick was
amazing.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Doc Edgerton was an early electrical engineer, in Dynamo Engineering I
believe. He developed the flash to help freeze the spinning machinery for a good
look. In the hall outside
Bogen/Manfrotto 486 compact ball head, used a couple
I'm interested. Is it a quick release style? Would
it be too small for 2021 legs?
Nope, it's not quick release. According to BH, it fits any Bogen
tripod. It was too big to work with my monopod; that's why I'm selling
it.
Hi,
But wouldn't large(ish) calibre bullets make a mess of what you're trying
to photograph - depending on subject, of course? If it was an egg, for
instance, wouldn't an air gun pellet make a more interesting shot than a
.22 round?
there are some interesting examples here of someone
Thanks for the answers!
Agree with Cotty that it could be usefull to have leading blur (due to first
curtain sync) to suggest that the movement was backwards.
Donot agree with Christian,also with second curtain sync, blur can be
avoided by using highest speed and/or balancing flash and ambient
ShelShel
Yes, couldn't wait for real one, and found a REALLY NICE copy here in
Paris, they are labelled MEKKO and are much nicer than the ones I have seen
on Ebay, it comes complete with a hard bottom padded insert that takes
three lenses or MX/Leica size bodies with lenses mounted, I initially
The old 340 GByte drives had a nasty tendency to lockup with the read
head/arm partially in-between its normal operation and park positions. This
happened to me personally; the 1 GByte replacement hasn't exhibited this
phenomenon (yet) but plummeting flash prices have found me not using the
Whoops
I've just looked, these are
+1
+2
and+3
$ 10 apiece!
Clive
Antibes
France
På 23. jan. 2004 kl. 07.54 skrev mike wilson:
Bob W wrote:
I'm speaking from a position of almost total ignorance here, but
surely a bullet is travelling 2 or 3 times faster than sound? Over the
short distances involved is it really possible to do this?
It's possible to get bullets that travel at
Me too -- that was a SCARY sentence. (I think the answer is No, in this case,
by the way.)
Yes, I am glad that I saw the photo before I read that.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Doc Edgerton was an early electrical engineer, in Dynamo Engineering I
believe. He developed the flash to help freeze the spinning machinery for a good
look. In the hall outside his lab there were some of his early photos,
including Ariel Recon photos of
What´s the general opinion of this lens?
I bought one quite cheaply, 50 Euros - the mount is strangely corroded but seems to
work OK.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
What is the current simplest solution for doing
HIGH QUALITY BW digital prints. I'd like to be
able to do 13 wide prints like my epson 1280,
but create BW prints that look like wet prints, something
the standard 1280 inks CANT DO. Not even close.
JCO
Lewis Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember, BW photography is all about light and shadow,
Isn't this a rather restricted interpretation? Aren't line and form of
considerable significance?
Not to mention flowers and kittens.
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Don't try
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the current simplest solution for doing HIGH QUALITY
BW digital prints.
FTP it to a lab that uses b/w paper.
tv
I also shoot ***L (*ist D for highest quality/res jpeg). It's easily
sufficient unto the task. If I need better, I can switch to Tiff or Raw
on the fly. To be honest, however, unless I'm also using a tripod there
probably isn't much point. I have one Lexar 1GB card, 1 GB IBM
microdrive and a
The new HP printers do a good job on BW; they have
light grey inks to make them an 8-color printer. BW
on them uses ONLY black/grey inks; no color cast. As
far as I know, they can't print as large as you want,
though.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
What is the current simplest solution for doing
HIGH
On 23 Jan 2004 at 7:04, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hey, if the cards are such a good deal, if shooting digital
is such a good deal, there should be no hesitancy in getting
as many cards as you can afford and shooting at the highest
resolution possible. And of course, if need be, some kind
of
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I also shoot ***L (*ist D for highest quality/res jpeg). It's easily
sufficient unto the task. If I need better, I can switch to Tiff or Raw
on the fly. To be honest, however, unless I'm also using a tripod there
probably isn't much point. I
The latest HP 8 color printer is reported to be the best BW printer
out right now. The HP 7960 - the two extra colors are dark and light
gray or some such. Do some surfing and see what you can find out.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, January 23, 2004, 1:59:26 PM, you wrote:
JCOC What is
Shel,
Where did you get all that data on the Sony S85 image?
Is it burried somewhere in the jpg?
Why didn't you use a fine resolution jpg, as this is a lower quality one.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Christian ... I think all you'd need to know is here. Ti highlight your
Wow, thank you! I hope to scan/upload some recent stuff, including some
more of the cubs, this weekend.
-Original Message-
From: P Kong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 22, 2004 11:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: I did it.
At 07:12 PM 1/22/2004, Bill
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please, can you tell me what is wrong/has to be fixed with the first
one that made you not to chose it?
Um...
Like Alan, I don't usually do people photography, so what counts for me is
the general impression more than the
Hi Bob,
It comes up with the image in the editing software.
In IrfanView it comes up by clicking on
IMAGE INFORMATION EXIF
In Photoshop 7.0 it can be brought up using the file browser.
I didn't use the fine resolution because I forgot that
the camera was set on standard for some email stuff
Hi Boris ... while there may be numerous reasons to chose one photo over
another, your questions begs this little joke.
A nice Jewish mother gave her son two ties for his birthday. Wanting to show
his appreciation for the gift, he wore one to dinner the next evening. Upon
seeing the tie, his
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
