On 10 May 2001, at 1:36, tom wrote:
Kevin Thornsberry wrote:
As a fisherman I've done this for years without a thought. My mom used to
carry a plastic maglite knockoff that might be less offensive I guess.
Plastic is ok. Metal makes me gag.
Gee tom, what the hell are you doing
It appears to me that what remains are actually spots of coating damaged by
the enzymes in my saliva. I worked them well with Kodak lens tissue and a
lens cleaner liquid that always worked on everything else. I truly think
my
saliva could lick the coatings off a lens.
You mean... like the
I'd like to try one of these, however, I've not seen any in my local
shops and may have to purchase by mail order. In either case, I'm
curious to know if there are different brands, sizes, etc. Is there
anything to look for in the way they're constructed (plastic v
metal)? Thanks!
There are
Tell me this is not the truth. Sunny-bright !? You'd think the dang
Care-Bears took over the freaking marketing department.
I won't be surprised at all. I once bought a funny named Kodak print film
(can't remember the name) at safeway and only found out it was the plain old
Gold 400 (which was
My opinion is:
The heaviest the better when hand held, I really like my setup when it goes
over 2Kg preferably over 3Kg (6.6lbs),
max 8Kg for me handheld(I can handle about 12 frames at that weight before a
need to rest my arm.)
The longest Ive shot handheld was about 300mm 5.6 , 2 TC(4x),
Here is my list:
very light is MX with 35-80 2.8 Tamron and motor drive
Light set:
Frame:
-LX + Motor drive
-MX + Motor drive
-2 Mgrip
Lenses:
-35-80mm 2.8 Tamron Macro
-70-210 3.8 Tamron (Deperately try to get rid of it)
-28mm 2.8 SMC
-50mm 1.4 SMC
-100mm 2.8 SMC
-2X TC
Films
-2 APX25
-2
Just consider who the consumer isdubious graduates of inept schools who
cannot read, count, or reason, but probably have an undeserved high self
esteem. No wonder they get confused.
Um... this seems to be the case... in many US movies...
regards,
Alan Chan
On 10 May 2001, at 11:13, Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
My next experiment was to decrease the aperture by 5 stops, i.e., f/22 and
therefore the exposure has to be increased by 5 stops, i.e., 64 sec. I got
a very horrible result. It was severely underexposed.
Decreasing the aperture and
It's already becoming to be a nuisance..
The problem I had last time I wanted to buy film in a General Store, not
a photo store, as an emergency measure, was that they only had Kodak Ultra
and Zoom (I think) color films in *partially opaque* plastic tube-like
3-film packs. I turned the packaging
On Wed, 9 May 2001 23:25:23 -0400, Doug Brewer wrote:
Thanks for the tips, Jan. Maybe I'll be able to talk my guide into visiting these
spots.
Yes, the problem is there is so much to see, Arches NP is also around the corner
All of this a little east of Grand Junction on the I70.
Mixed up
Hi,
yesterday I bought a 70-210 A zoom lens. This is supposed to be an
excellent zoom lens. However, the zoom is a bit loose, the zoom/focus
barrel/ring moves if I set the lens on its mount.
A few days ago someone wrote that I should tighten the screws under
the rubber ring. So I looked under it
When the exposure is that long, it's subject to the reciprocity failure
of the film. That could be anywhere from one to two stops, depeniding on
the emulsion. Try 128 and 256 second exposures at f22.
Paul
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
Hi!
I was trying to photograph the dial of my table
In a message dated 5/9/2001 7:27:41 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Must tmax film be developed with tmax developer?
Tx,
Collin
With T-Max 400, I've had better success using D-76 1:1. I generally rate
the film at 320 and soup it for 10 minutes at 68
Hi there,
does anyone knows of a metal hood for the 85/1.8 K lens. I mean in the
style of the metal hood originally manufactured for a Takumar 135mm
that fits the 135/2.5 SMC lens. The combination of lastnamed pair works
out fine, so I am anxious to know if my restless search for a likewise
Hi,
Having heard/read about differences in metering properties of
respective focusing screens, I would like to ask if anybody can answer
this question: what is exactly the exposure compensation to be used
when inserting a LX-focusing screen into a MX-camera?
And, if anybody has experience in
Hmmm, I have a little 35mm lens catalouge (Pentax number 55993) that
disagrees somewhat with your list.
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
William Robb wrote:
Gerald is a cousin to that cute reptile on Alien... The one with
sulphuric acid for blood
Hey, Gerald, have you tried to dissolve things other than chewing gum in
your mouth? Like rocks 'n' stuff?
I only ask because if I had a superpower like that I'd be using it
It depends on what I am shooting, where and how I am traveling. Have a look
at the 'Equipment' section of my VERY unfinnised website at
www.billsnature.com.
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
James Apilado wrote:
I will wait to hear evaluations from those who buy one first. Then, I may
sell my LX. Yes, I know it's heresy to write that.
Yes, please leave the list immediately. You've been excommunicated. :)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
On Wed, 09 May 2001 18:24:20 -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You can also get a headband which will carry a Maglite.
Will it carry the 2AA or the 2AAA?
The ones that I've seen are intended for the 2xAA Maglite. The 2xAAA
Maglites have gotten very scarce in this area. I've been seeking one
Frank Wajer wrote:
yesterday I bought a 70-210 A zoom lens. This is supposed to be
an excellent zoom lens. However, the zoom is a bit loose, the
zoom/focus barrel/ring moves if I set the lens on its mount. A few
days ago someone wrote that I should tighten the screws under the
rubber ring.
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi,
I'll have a go (I hope there aren't 100's of replies preceding mine). Firstly the
initial over-exposure would most probably have been due to the camera
metering setting the exposure to achieve an overall 18% gray. Since I
assume that a high
Hi all,
I just finished my weekly grocery/etc. shopping last night. Of all things
to find on the clearance rack at the rear corner of my local pharmacy, I
found three or four boxes of Kodachrome 64 (35mm, 36 exp., with anywhere
from a few months to a year until expiration), and a couple boxes
Hi Boz!
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Bojidar Dimitrov wrote:
Decreasing the aperture and increasing the time accordingly will NORMALLY
produce a picture with the same brightness. You have to EITHER close the
aperture OR decrease the time.
Now, why didn't this happen with your second shot?
Are you covering the eye piece? I understand that light coming thru the eye
piece on long exposures messes up the metering. My PZ-70 mentions this in
the manual AND the camera comes with a cover. Unfortunately, you have to
remove the rubber ring about the eyepiece so I usually cover with black
Hi!
Aheeem! I have a question here. When I took my first shot with 2 sec
exposure, the camera recorded the track of the seconds hand. If I do a 256
sec exposure (say), shall I be able to record the circular track of the
seconds hand? If yes, it would be a spectacular photo, atleast for me.
Any
Bueno, al fin otro argentino en la lista. Bienvenido!!
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Hernán Mouro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: Bodies Roll Call Results UPDATE 89
Hola Albano. Yo tengo una ZX-5n reluciente,
On 10 May 2001, at 18:38, Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
Hi!
Aheeem! I have a question here. When I took my first shot with 2 sec
exposure, the camera recorded the track of the seconds hand. If I do a 256
sec exposure (say), shall I be able to record the circular track of the
seconds
Hugo Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having heard/read about differences in metering properties of
respective focusing screens, I would like to ask if anybody can
answer
this question: what is exactly the exposure compensation to be
used
when inserting a LX-focusing screen into a MX-camera?
Hi!
Ultimately, I have decided to move in to the fascinating world of black
and white photography. I have always like it but could not getting any
opertunity and time for doing that. (In research life it is very difficult
to get some time out). A few days back I got hold of darkroom and it has
Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Isaac, that it's necessarily the dumbing down of
photographers
that everyone is bemoaning, it's more the dumbing down of people in
general.
---
The dashboards of some Audis, Fords, and other car makes no longer include
an analog
Bill,
You are from the hometown of the 'Great Yellow Father'! g
Out here in the boonies, 'We don't do no stinkin' Kodachrome processing.'
I thought there was 1 plant in the USA - Minnesota maybe?
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Before I go back and clean out their stock, I want
On 10 May 2001, at 3:47, Hugo Kok wrote:
Hi,
Having heard/read about differences in metering properties of
respective focusing screens, I would like to ask if anybody can answer
this question: what is exactly the exposure compensation to be used
when inserting a LX-focusing screen into
Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But since Porta and Supra are still packaged with films speeds on them and
lack the when to use this
film graphics on the box, I've got no gripe.
Well, I'VE got a gripe: Kodak's pro films come packed directly in a plastic
cylinder; There is
Ok. My stmp server is totally screwed. Can anyone recommend a web based email
system that I could use with eudora.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
There is no dedicated metal Pentax hood for the K85/1.8. The best
hood for that lens is the Nikon HN-7.
Hugo Kok wrote:
Hi there,
does anyone knows of a metal hood for the 85/1.8 K lens.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Grain is the brushstroke of photography. - Man Ray
-
Recently, Paul wrote:
Well, I'VE got a gripe: Kodak's pro films come packed directly in a plastic
cylinder; There is no cardboard to slip under my camera's film reminder
Ummm, not to seem too nit-picky - but what's wrong w/ just
writing a new film type on the back of one
Ayash Kanto wrote:
The room was made absolutely dark, so I don't think the light meter got
affected while taking the first shot. Rob's explaination for the
overexposure of the first shot seems logical. And in the second shot, it
was bulb mode exposure, so lightmeter is out of the picture.
As for the Maglite, I know I'll be happy with it. Been using them
for years, just never for photography. Can't wait until it gets
dark so I can shine the Mini Maglite (2AA) through the finder of the
LX and see how or if it can improve focusing, as has been suggested
by Bob Walkden and others.
I haven't complained yet. Next time I take some E6 in I'm going to bring
the samples I've talked about and show them.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Provencher, Paul M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: RE: E6 Processing Goo-gob
Hello Ayash,
I don't know if the MZ-M allows multiple exposures. It probably does, in
that case maybe you could try 60 half-second exposures... tedious, yes but
might be worth trying. (provided you can wind and cock the shutter in less than
half a
second :). Or try more+shorter
Well, without even thinking about this thread, this is what I left the house
with today - this is just gear to have in case I see something to make an
image:
Spotmatic
w/ SMCT 1.8/85mm, Polarizing Filter, hood
Super-Takumar-Zoom 4.5/70~150 w/case/caps/hood/tripod collar
In my backpack:
Yep it's the real Pentax stuff and brand spanking new.
I'd be happy to write up what I think after using it.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: Macro Rail Extension Tubes
That's
On 10 May 2001, at 17:54, Fabrice Gamberini wrote:
I too find long exposures quite fascinating and I have discovered recently the
work of Hiroshi Sugimoto, a Japanese photog who used to take pictures in movie
theatres, excepted that he chose to expose the entire duration of the movie,
Lately I am surfing more in ebay and found this 400 /5.6 lens.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1235284917r=0t=0sh
owTutorial=0ed=989539195indexURL=0rd=1
Bye
Ramesh
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
A friend of mine has a MX and it is about 23years old. Till last year it
worked fine but this year is showed some film transport problem. What
happened was that the teeth of the spindle on which the film runs, slipped
quite often. As a result, it ended with superposed exposure between
adjacent
Pelican Products' URL is http://www.pelican.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
DG,
My original ME had a problem with the stand-off spring on the winder lever. After
several years of use and letting it 'snap' back against the camera body on winding,
the metal spring broke, sending a metal tab into the gear train. I believe the gears
are plastic (somebody who has had
Shel,
Shooting for me is a two stage effort. My main camera bag contains
just about everything I need. It is the one that I know I just need to put
camera and lenses into and I can travel internationally. I tend to have a
fanny pack that I cart the cameras and lenses for going around.
I've had five or six ME Supers and an MX. None have shown any
indication of transport problems. However, the MX doesn't seem to
advance the film as smoothly as the ME Supers, and at one time I had
to make a small adjustment to the film advance by tightening a screw
or bold on the bottom of the
Ernest Alejandria wrote:
Estella Warren and a 67 in a movie should make it an automatic thumbs-up.
And Gena Gershon!
But since it's a Stallone movie, it's probably just another reincarnation of
the old and tired Rocky theme. :)
If only it were that good ...
--
John Francis [EMAIL
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
snip
Kodak have a very low opinion of the average consumer's intelligence
(you should read some of their industrial advertising), but I think that
on the whole they're pretty much on the ball. People don't WANT to know
the technical side unless they're into it as a
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Ryan Brooks wrote:
- Quick shot of a 67 in the movie Driven.
Well, I guess now I have to see it.
It'll take more than that to get me into a cinema to see this.
Heck, I turned down an offer of the premiere showing, complete
with pre-movie access to the stars (but
At 09:10 AM 5/10/01 -0400, you wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
We're
used to a standard roll being 36 exposures, a short roll at 24
exposures, and with few exceptions, that's the way it's been.
Actually, the sales figures show us that in consumer films, 24s outsell
36s and 12s by a country
No. Any BW developer will do, but dilutions and times can be
tricky.
At 08:22 PM 05/09/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Must tmax film be developed with tmax developer?
Tx,
Collin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
-
This message is from the
I should confess that I probably take as many pictures (as
opposed to burning thru frames to make sure I got it) with
my Olympus Epic Stylus 80. It fits in a shirt pocket, the
lens is good, I trust the metering and the people I'm with don't
have to wait around while I fiddle with gadgets and
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Basicly, as I see your situation, the main problem you seem to
have encountered (and learned from, too ;^) is that your meter
(as all meters) offers the exposure which will yield a standard
scene/18% grey rendition.
-- Original Message --
Kodak have a very low opinion of the average consumer's intelligence
(you should read some of their industrial advertising), but I think that
on the whole they're pretty much on the ball. People don't WANT to know
the technical side unless they're into it as a hobby or
At 09:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Darkroom
In a message dated 5/9/2001 7:27:41 PM US Eastern
Hello Fabrice!
Now there is a big problem. MZ-M does not allows multiple exposure but the
kind of experiment you have suggested can be done with bulb mode. The
extra labour that I have to do is cover the lens occasionally with a black
cloth. I can not use the lens cap because it disturbs the
Nope,
That's the 4 pin cord for the MOTORDRIVE . . . I'm looking for the 3 pin for the
WINDER . . . BTW, I have a LONG 4 pin cord if anyone needs it.
Bill
On Wed, 09 May 2001, Donald Ross wrote:
Hi Bill
Would this be it??
Unless I'm buying ProPacks that only come in 36s, I
prefer the 24s. Often I'll process rolls with only 12 - 18 frames
exposed and the wastage is a little less. Also the standard
negative file sheets for 36 are unsatisfactory -- those that
hold 36 frames won't contact print on 8x10 and the ones
dick graham wrote:
Last weekend I spent some time in Barnes Noble. In the photography
section I found a book entitled "Classic 35mm SLRs". It coverd almost
every 35mm slr from the late 1940's on. The Pentax section was quite
complete but when the author got to the M series(ME, ME
John Francis wrote:
Ernest Alejandria wrote:
Estella Warren and a 67 in a movie should make it an automatic thumbs-up.
And Gena Gershon!
And Estella's a fine Canadian girl.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of people have commented on how they think
Kodak's new labeling/packaging reflects on the
knowledgability or intelligence of the film buyers.
Just to be perfectly clear, since I was the first to jump into this
with a comment of disgust and revulsion. My
Hi all,
All this talk about what sort of coin one carries in the camera bag to aid
in changing the battery made me remember something. I'd like to get another
screw-in battery compartment cover for a used KM body I bought last year.
The cover it now has is pretty gouged up around the coin slot.
Hi, this is going to sound silly, but
is there a reason why the sticky mirror syndrome
only happens on the LX? There are so many other
Pentaxes out there that have been in storage,
or have weathered the years, why aren't they
susceptible? Or are they?
Also, what's a decent used price for a
¡Hola, Martin!
Luis
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Hi again,
another question to check out the Pentax Data Base that is YOU.
Situation is: comparing three of my lenses with fixed aperture (let's
say: 5.6), the light meter gives on all three of them a different
exposure time. That is: 50mm OK, 85mm +1 stop, 135mm +1/2 stop. After
extensive
Ayash Kanto wrote:
Now, I am getting
some acceptable results but I am not much happy with it. I feel that the
use of neutral density graduated filter would have done better for
non-average situations.
Ummm - the neutral density filter will just shift everything,
in effect
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happened was that the teeth of the spindle on which the film runs,
slipped
quite often. As a result, it ended with superposed exposure between
adjacent frames.
I had this problem several times a year with my Minox 35 GT,
Thanks for the suggestion, Shel.
Hugo.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Thanks Seth Rob for the input.
I once was told that the enlargement factor of the fresnel lens was
also fractionally different between the MX and LX screens. I know not
if the former sentence is ape-bread but to me it sounds like it being
possible. What function does the fresnel-lens (or other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'VE got a gripe: Kodak's pro films come packed directly in a plastic
cylinder; There is no cardboard to slip under my camera's film reminder
slot. I'm not saying Kodak should pack the cylinder in a cardboard box. But
it would be nice if the cylinder also
Hugo Kok (? HAR! :) wrote:
another question to check out the Pentax Data Base that is YOU.
Situation is: comparing three of my lenses with fixed aperture (let's
say: 5.6), the light meter gives on all three of them a different
exposure time. That is: 50mm OK, 85mm +1 stop, 135mm +1/2 stop.
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other members, thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started this
way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly in
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
Now, I have a ridiculous problem. On the pack of the developer, it is
clearly mentioned how to make the stock and working solution but there is
nothing written on the polythene pack of hypo crystals. (It is a 500gm
pack).
Does the hypo have a mixed liquid
In a message dated 5/10/01 1:40:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
comparing three of my lenses with fixed aperture (let's
say: 5.6), the light meter gives on all three of them a different
exposure time.
Maybe it's just an estimate on the barrel. Could actually be more or
Yet these same cars feature a fuel gage AND a low fuee warning light that
blinks as your fuel becomes dangerously low. Why can't the oil gage do the
same?
Mostly because the oil indicator is really an oil pressure indicator. The
quantity of oil is not what's being measured. The threshold for
Hugo wrote:
Situation is: comparing three of my lenses with fixed aperture (let's
say: 5.6), the light meter gives on all three of them a different
exposure time. That is: 50mm OK, 85mm +1 stop, 135mm +1/2 stop.
After extensive comparisons in which all possible other explanations
were ruled
Fairly often, M series bodies go on ebay with busted transport (free
swinging winder lever). I think I saw 2 in the past week.
- Original Message -
From: dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 7:53 AM
Subject: M series Film Transport Problems
In a message dated 10/05/01 09:56:17 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm looking for the 3 pin cord that connects the batterpack lx to the
winder lx. Anyone have one, or see one for sale recently?
Bill - which LX Battery Pack do you have? - Is that the LX Remote Battery
In a message dated 10/05/01 09:56:17 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's a carabiner?
You say cara-, we say kara - . Or crab.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
I guess the question is, Is Kodak contributing to, or reacting to, the
'dumbing down' of society?
Truth is, most people want simple, worry free cameras to take snapshots
of the family or vacations with. Walk around a tourist area: how many
non-ps cameras do you see? Not many.
Most folks want
What kind of lenses are these? If they are A series or newer I would
suggest putting the lens into A and see if the results are the same, since
when the lens is in A that lever is not used (the MZ-50 and MZ-30 are good
examples of this). If the difference is still there then it's something to
Hello.
Here's a little dilemma I wonder if any of you have come across. LX AF280T
- flash in A mode - all fine dandy. Flash in TTL mode - mirror locks up.
Not the flash - tried another one - does the very same thing.
Any ideas?
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Hope. Not there now g
Actually I,ve been watching this for a while. I thought JCO would start a last minute
charge
but with only 2 hrs left, I couldn't afford waiting to see if the reserve was met and
then
losing to a last minute BIN. Can't count the times this has happened. It looks like
Of all the Pentax cameras I own or have ever owned, only the LX has little
rubber baby bumpers and such to dampen the mirror slap and return. The
others all slap metal at different places in their visible and internal
workings. I suspect this may have something to do with it.
Regards,
Bob...
That's my thoughts too. The LX is Pentax's most complex camera bulit so
far, so stuff like the sticky mirror doesn't surprise me. That's the same
reason the K1000 is so reliable - there is so little that can go wrong with
it in comparison to the LX.
Todd
PS. LX buffs check out:
I have one hood labeled Takumar 1:1.8 85mm which fits very nicely on a K
85mm /1.8 lens. It does require a 52mm = 58mm step-up adapter though . . .
I also have a VERY similar looking hood labeled Takumar 1:1.9 85mm, also
requires a 58mm thread. That one I have sitting on a 100mm lens.
Clearly
I work for an Industrial Wholesale Supplier. ( The middle man
between manufacturers and Retailers or Other Wholesalers. )
I had occasion to go into the Warehouse today ( The Building
covers 3 City blocks ), the MAG Lite section is on racks that are 12'
( 4m ) Wide by 6' ( 2m ) Deep by 30'
http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
WW
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 10, 2001 9:28 PM
Subject: Yoshihiko?
Does anyone know where Yoshihiko's website has gone?
Thanks,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the
Does anyone know where Yoshihiko's website has gone?
Thanks,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I think the server is temporarily down, as just http://www.takinami.com
return not found, which is really odd.
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 8:28 PM
Subject: Yoshihiko?
Does anyone know where Yoshihiko's
Hi Aaron!
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Does the hypo have a mixed liquid volume listed on the front? Usually
for the Kodak stuff it'll say 5L (or whatever) on the front...you simply
dump the powder into that much water and mix.
Nothing such is written on the polythene
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Lewis, Gerald wrote:
Does the hypo have a mixed liquid volume listed on the front? Usually
for the Kodak stuff it'll say 5L (or whatever) on the front...you simply
dump the powder into that much water and mix.
No, I think it is a dilute to volume...for a gallon, put
I have a AF200SA flash for sale. It is in what KEH would call EX+ condition and it
includes the case.
I'll take the first $40.00 plus $5.00 for shipping.
Please reply off list to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Hiya Shel -
I've seen business cards which were photographs with the lettering super
imposed on the image. They look pretty cool!
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Pentax List
Hi Ayash:
I did a little research for you. Here is what I found:
Ilford Ilfofix (from powder) has a specific gravity of 1.185
when correctly mixed to stock solution.
A package with a net weight of 1175 grams makes 5 litters of
fixer.
Some old Ilford fixer formulas call for 400 grams of Sodium
A package with a net weight of 1175 grams makes 5 litters of
fixer.
But they would be very small litters. Perhaps only 2 or three
domestic kittens.
Umm, that should read litres. Passed by the spell checker, but
failed by the coherence checker.
William Robb
-
This message is from the
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
