Agreed!
What was the lens?
On 12/3/2010 1:00 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Wow! That is indeed a stunning image.
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Ken Wallerkwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
A very good, vivid well focused image !
Kenneth
never seceded, it didn't have to (re-!)join.
Am I missing something?
Igor
Fri Dec 3 10:47:53 CST 2010
Walter Gilbert wrote:
This sort of reminds me of the ongoing dispute here in the US
between Kentucky and Illinois. Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky,
but spent most of his life
Well, if you ever decide to rid yourself of all your material
possessions in order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, I call dibs.
-- Walt
On 12/3/2010 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Agreed!
What was the lens?
For this?
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog
Thankfully, he had it within his heart not to say so.
-- Walt
On 12/3/2010 2:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 3, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Agreed!
What was the lens?
He probably just used a lensbaby with the teleconverter, just to show us up.
--
Larry Colen l
I was born in Virginia -- out of which Kentucky was carved -- yet,
neither place seems all that anxious to claim me.
-- Walt
On 12/3/2010 4:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
This sort of reminds me of the ongoing dispute here in the US
between Kentucky and Illinois
Very nice image, Nick.
I didn't realize the Walmart machines correct mistakes for the
photographer.
How nice of them.
On 12/4/2010 8:33 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
http://blog.nickdavidwright.net/2010/12/leave-light-on.html
This shot has set in my files since I shot it. It is another
in such foolishness.
:-\
On 12/4/2010 11:37 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Dec 4, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Very nice image, Nick.
I didn't realize the Walmart machines correct mistakes for the photographer.
How nice of them.
All automatic processing machines average out the values
Welcome aboard, Kent!
First of all, you don't want that old M-50/1.7 -- let me take that off
your hands.
Secondly, with regard to editing software, you might give The Gimp a
try. Being a WinXP guy, I don't know if it would be as much of a
resource hog as Bibble, but I'm sure someone on
I do like that a lot, Paul. So much so that I'm tempted to cut off
all contact with you, henceforth.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 11:34 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
From this summer's dream cruise, which played out in the rain. Perhaps the
nicest Studebaker of them all.
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the
floor. Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the
focusing ring on the lens sticks at the far and near end.
Goddammit.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the floor.
Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the focusing ring
on the lens sticks at the far and near end.
Goddammit.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
before I'd even set up
a real shot with it.
Again, I do appreciate the gesture, and I thank you. But, I may just be
lucky this time.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 9:03 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thing is, relatively speaking, it might as well have been a $1000
lens.
Boy, I
averted.
Now, if my cat comes out of hiding, all will be back to normal.
Thanks to everyone who replied and offered help and/or condolences, and
apologies to anyone my choice of profanity may have offended.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 8:17 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x
if the focus field remains flat. Use a
tripod and make sure the camera is square to the wall.
Paul
On Dec 4, 2010, at 11:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Well, somehow, the lens seems to be working properly. It's loosened up
quite a bit after a lot of manipulation (though the rubber around the focusing
Ha! :-D Great shot!
When I was in Arkansas, I went to a drive-thru safari that had a walking
zoo you could go through. At the end of the walk, we came to a pen that
housed some monkeys next to a pen that housed a tiger cub and lion cub
together, with a gate separating them. One of the
Thanks again. :-)
I'm a big believer in funky lenses. If the optics are good, I couldn't
care less what the rest of it looks like. And, besides -- beggars can't
be choosers.
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 11:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Good to hear... hope you are lucky - my funky one will be
, Walter Gilbert, discombobulated, unleashed:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the
floor. Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the
focusing ring on the lens sticks at the far and near end.
Walt, the one and only time I ever dropped my
Fortunately, I know a vet who was able to talk me through it.
On 12/5/2010 4:24 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 4/12/10, Walter Gilbert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Now, if my cat comes out of hiding, all will be back to normal.
I gather that to remove a Pentax SMC lens from a cat's butt in fact
Ha! Just not *my* cat.
On 12/5/2010 4:33 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
My cat just knocked it and my K-x off the top of a dresser, onto the floor.
Fortunately, the camera still seems to be working. But now, the focusing
This was one of those instances when cats suddenly decide they need to
be in a different place, RIGHT NOW!
-- Walt
On 12/5/2010 7:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I have to be really carefull where i leave stuff. Lucy likes to bat
stuff off tables and such.
Dave
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:17 PM,
consumer grade films?
-- Walt
On 12/4/2010 8:52 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Great. Looks like I'm staring down the barrel of another expense to
go along with my newly acquired pursuit of film photography: good
printer, ink, and paper.
Seems there ought to be a way
That is just a great shot.
To say the least, it relates an experience I'm not likely to have
anytime soon, as there appear to be more people in that hallway than in
my entire town.
-- Walt
On 12/5/2010 8:46 AM, DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
On 12/5/2010 10:40 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Real black and white (i.e. - not the c41 bw) has the potential to be
sharper than color because of the way it's made.
Thanks, David. I can see I'm going to need to do a little research to
determine what constitutes real bw vs. C41. I know the
Ha! I thought it was a mirrored hallway full of elevators! :-D
Oddly enough, my point still stands. ;-)
-- Walt
On 12/5/2010 11:07 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Take another look, Walt. Appears to me to be a mirrored elevator.
Jack
--- On Sun, 12/5/10, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Pentax: Where's the fire?
On 12/5/2010 3:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful photographer.
Or how about Pentax 645D, Hasselblad on a budget.
--
Sent
I'll happily trade my beloved K-x for one of those blobby old
K-5's. Because that's just the sort of guy I am.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2010 5:46 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Miserere wrote:
I would start a thread on PF requesting people to test their K-5 and
post the result together with the serial
I does what I can. :-)
On 12/6/2010 6:38 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 19:09, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll happily trade my beloved K-x for one of those blobby old K-5's.
Because that's just the sort of guy I am.
-- Walt
Yeah, you have a big heart, Walt.
Wow. Three days, two lenses and 25 shots to figure out what ought
to be discernible in 3 shots through one lens over the course of, what,
fifteen minutes?
I want that guy reading my MRI's.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2010 7:24 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I quote;
I have spent last 3 days to see
Of course, if one were to look for a bright side in all of this,
they might put two-and-two together and realize that what this all
really boils down to is some pretty good deals on refurbs in the
not-too-distant future.
And the circle of life goes on.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2010 8:21 PM,
In Russia, cat names owner.
-- Walt
On 12/7/2010 6:21 AM, Leon Altoff wrote:
Hi Everyone,
We are about to buy a female Russian Blue cat and want a Russian name
for her. We are buying her with money earned from ringing church
bells for weddings and thought that a bell related name would
I'd like to see Susan Boyle try that!
Actually ... let me walk that back a little.
-- Walt
On 12/7/2010 12:34 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
This woman has real talent:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVpjHXPT1ocfeature=player_embedded
Dan
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
Wow! It didn't even get close to nudity or sexual content. I was
comfortable enough with it to post it on my Facebook page, and I'm
relatively prudish when it comes to the content I'll put on it.
Far be it from me to tell YouTube what they can post, but that video
didn't violate their
no protections at all.
On 12/8/2010 11:36 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Wow! It didn't even get close to nudity or sexual content. I
was comfortable enough with it to post it on my Facebook page, and
I'm relatively prudish when it comes to the content I'll put on it.
Far be it from me to tell
Hi all,
Well, I've had a couple more images accepted into the Pentax Photo
Gallery, making it a grand total of eight, and thought I'd share with
the group. The two most recent are the ostrich (Maybelline) and the
fawn (Trepidation).
I still have one more shot pending, though I'm not
I would really love to attend, though it depends on my fortunes over
the course of the next few months. If things take a drastic turn, count
me in. If things stay the same, it'll be a long shot. If one more
domino falls -- well, *maybe* I'll be able to attend the 20th
anniversary
Thank you, Jack!
Glad you enjoyed it. :-)
-- Walt
On 12/8/2010 12:28 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Just took a very pleasing look. Excellent, Walt.
Jack
--- On Wed, 12/8/10, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Subject: More Additions to the Pentax
Thank you very much, Dan!
Having a mimosa tree in the front yard does have its benefits. They
really provide a nice backdrop when they're in bloom. And, if you catch
the butterflies early in the season, before they get all beaten up and
start losing pieces of their wings, they make
Hi all,
Here's another butterfly shot I'm considering submitting to the PPG and
thought I'd get some opinions on beforehand. I'm just a tad iffy on
it, as it just doesn't strike me as particularly vivid -- something I'm
partial to in my butterfly images. Of course, it's a matter of taste
Oops ... forgot the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200, 1/320, Aperture priority, unknown
aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Here's another butterfly shot I'm considering submitting to the PPG
and thought I'd get some opinions on beforehand
Well, now ... that's quite nice!
-- Walt
On 12/8/2010 2:20 PM, Miserere wrote:
http://nedbunnell.posterous.com/pentax-photo-book-for-the-holidays-0
Mark was wondering if they'd received the book he sent, and here's the
answer. The book looks even better in person than it did online,
unlike
: A Swallowtail in Respite
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 11:45 AM
Oops ... forgot the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200, 1/320, Aperture
priority, unknown aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Here's another
in Respite
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 11:45 AM
Oops ... forgot the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200, 1/320,
Aperture
priority, unknown aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Here's another
: A Swallowtail in
Respite
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 11:45
AM
Oops ... forgot
the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO 200,
1/320,
Aperture
priority, unknown aperture setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter Gilbert
wrote
... forgot
the deets:
K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO
200,
1/320,
Aperture
priority, unknown aperture
setting.
On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter
Gilbert
wrote:
Hi
all,
Here's another butterfly shot
I'm
considering
submitting to the PPG and thought
I'd get
some
opinions
Congratulations, Bong!
Now, if they'll just keep lowering their standards, I should hit 200
right around, oh -- 2030, give or take.
-- Walt
On 12/8/2010 7:40 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Just made 200 http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/5180461525/
Interestingly, it was one of my K-r
Thanks, John. That's the way I see it, too.
On 12/9/2010 8:47 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
My opinion - and that's all it is - is that the softened focus version
is more pleasing to the eye. Makes it easier to focus on the butterfly
itself.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Great idea, Frank!
On 12/8/2010 10:29 PM, frank theriault wrote:
This should be fun:
http://realcanadianhats.blogspot.com/
;-)
I'll be posting my Big Winter Hats on this space from now on. The
title photo is new to the list, but oh so appropriate given the
blog's title, no?
Hope you
PENTAX: One release away from perfection.
On 12/5/2010 3:36 PM, Larry Colen (Droid Mail) wrote:
Last night when someone saw my camera she comented:
Pentax, the poor man's Nikon.
What else could we do with this:
Cannon, for the skilful photographer.
Or how about Pentax 645D, Hasselblad on a
Beautiful shot, Ted! Congratulations!
Was that at Steel Creek?
-- Walt
On 12/9/2010 7:06 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Still can't submit to the PUG for the rejected theme. One accepted and nine
still waiting review.
I guess I should've read the whole post. Heh.
On 12/9/2010 7:21 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Beautiful shot, Ted! Congratulations!
Was that at Steel Creek?
-- Walt
On 12/9/2010 7:06 PM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Still can't submit to the PUG for the rejected theme. One accepted
Happy birthday, Ann! As a gift, all I have to offer is your
continued possession of your M-50/1.4.
Hope you like it!
-- Walt
On 12/10/2010 9:15 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
(Clears throat.)
Happy birthday to you, happy birthday to you. Happy birthday, dear Ann, happy
birthday to you.
Paul
I rather enjoyed that, Frank!
-- Walt
On 12/10/2010 5:49 AM, frank theriault wrote:
I thought the late day sun behind the site might make for an
interesting silhouette with nice puffy clouds in the background:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/12/pouring-cement.html
Hope you enjoy.
Back when I worked as a claims processor for Allstate Insurance, I
got more than a few calls from homeowners -- in tears -- seeking to
claim damages due to raccoon infestation. They can do an AMAZING amount
of damage. So, you might want to thank your lucky stars that this
particular one
It's events like these that make me wish I lived closer to a
metropolitan area. Of course, there are other events that make me glad
I don't, but I digress.
I enjoyed the whole series, but something about 3984
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/5251197730/ stands out to
me.
If it's anything like similar protests in the US, I have to wonder how
many of those people are actually affected students as opposed to trust
fund anarchists looking for a thrill.
-- Walt
On 12/11/2010 10:20 AM, Bob W wrote:
Someone sent me this link - some very powerful pics...
I'd read about Gilmour's son -- so ironically fitting. He's the one
guy who least stood to gain or lose, yet he participated in the very
activity that is most likely to cause a backlash leading to a setback
for the movement he purports to support. Being shielded from the
consequences of
It's my understanding that, in the British system, unlike in the US,
the loser of the case is responsible for the legal fees and court costs
of the winner. That would tend to make their system more workable, an d
would almost certainly make them more likely to foot the bill for the
It varies from one state to the next, and from one jurisdiction
(district or circuit level) to the next. In some cases, it's up to the
judge's discretion, and in others, it's the jury's. State courts have a
huge degree of autonomy, even down to the very basis of legal precedent
-- in most
Hi all,
I stumbled across this link the other day looking for something
interesting to post on my Facebook page, and was just struck by some of
the images. There are a few that really stood out to me and I was
hoping someone might be able to tell me how to go about approximating
the
Yikes! Time to bring in the brass monkey.
Supposed to get down to around 10 here in Kentucky for the next couple
of nights, with winds around 20-30mph and gusts up to 45. That's plenty
cold for me. Not sure what that translates to in wind chill, but I'm
pretty sure it's nowhere -20 --
captured. If
you're talking about the rendering, It's a matter of emphasizing midrange and
shadow through exposure a bit on the minus side and consequent deep skin tones
and shadows.
Paul
On Dec 11, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I stumbled across this link the other day
hoping after Christmas that'll be less of an issue, though.
-- Walt
On 12/11/2010 10:35 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Dec 11, 2010, at 11:30 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, Paul.
I agree that the true beauty is in the moments captured, but I really love the
rendering as well. Maybe -1
You're welcome, Mr. Lahuerta.
Best,
Walt
On 12/12/2010 4:24 PM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Thanks for the link.
Let's take it in a positive way...there's a lot of...room for improvement...
Regards,
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Para:
Nice capture, Paul!
The young lady in the background ain't too shabby, either.
-- Walt
On 12/12/2010 2:14 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
It's rare to see a young woman these days who's not either texting or talking
on her cellphone. (That would be sexist if it weren't true. As such it's just
Thanks so much for the wonderfully informative answer, Tanya!
Not only did it tell me everything I need to know, but everything I
wanted to hear. I much prefer to use available light whenever possible,
and I was afraid it was going to turn out that I'd need to use external
flash with a
Great video, Dan.
(I'm still disgruntled about the disappearance of the Jingle Bells
video, BTW.)
-- Walt
On 12/12/2010 7:11 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.wimp.com/babyhummingbird/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
of photography is learning what the camera will see and how it will differ from what
you see.
Paul
On Dec 12, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks so much for the wonderfully informative answer, Tanya!
Not only did it tell me everything I need to know, but everything I wanted
Ah! OK!
I completely misunderstood your intent, and I apologize for my terse reply.
Best,
Walt
On 12/13/2010 2:46 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Just for clarification...I was referring to my photographic skills when I talked
about improvement.
I found them excellent too and far, far away
I wonder if it might not be easier than one might suspect. A few
days ago, I saw a drawing of the Pentax image stabilization system
demonstrating its use of electromagnets on the sensor to achieve it. I
can't help thinking it might be a fairly easy trick for them to use that
field to
That was extremely cool, Larry! Thanks for sharing.
-- Walt
On 12/13/2010 12:25 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
At the end of the video, they say Where books come to life
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBec95Mv8G8
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi all,
I have a friend who makes some really nice turquoise jewelry
(http://www.sisdesigns.com/) and she's asked me if I'd like to take a
shot at doing some photographs of her work for catalogs and design
conference submissions. We've already worked on some rudimentary
lighting and
That is unsettling. It's good, of course, that they won't be
destroying your home, but I have to wonder if they might have gotten
into some poisoned bait somewhere.
I know animal control generally only deals with domesticated animals,
pets and such. But, they might be interested in a
Thank you, Christine!
I did the work last night, and some of the shots turned out surprisingly
well for two people who didn't have the foggiest notion what they were
doing.
I burned about 150 shots getting the lighting and staging right, but
once I finally got things situated, I got some
Great choices, Ted!
Very deserving of inclusion.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 6:31 AM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
On checking the PPG this morning, I find that two more shots have been accepted.
That makes a total of five. Also I found that two had been rejected, but I guess
it is too late for the
Thanks, Bob.
I'll probably limited to the 50mm for a while. I considered using my 2X
TC, but the past few times I've used it, I had trouble getting it to
release from the camera body and don't want to risk putting it on there
and ending up damaging the camera trying to get it off there.
Thanks again, Christine!
I happen to be pretty well situated for fabrics, as my mother is one of
those little old ladies who does a lot of sewing -- quilts, blankets,
embroidery, you name it. She's got fabric aplenty I can pretty much
help myself to whenever the need arises.
And thanks
, 2010, at 6:31 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thank you, Christine!
I did the work last night, and some of the shots turned out surprisingly well
for two people who didn't have the foggiest notion what they were doing.
I burned about 150 shots getting the lighting and staging right, but once I
Thanks, Charles!
I'll be sure to keep this in mind in the event I need to throw something
together in a pinch.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 4:11 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 14, 2010, at 14:53, Larry Colen wrote:
Here are some of my $3 DiY lightbox:
Just stepping out, so I can't watch it just now. But, I've bookmarked
the page because I'm really looking forward to watching this.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 4:05 PM, Cotty wrote:
Hi folks,
Last month I went to Auschwitz and filmed a large school party on a
visit there. Some might be
Seriously? I would never have thought that!
I may actually try that to see what it looks like, just for grins.
Thanks, Boris!
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 12:09 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Walt, once I was told that using a flatbed scanner to actually take
pictures of jewelry can be a good
Thanks for the link, Bruce! Really informative stuff, there.
And, yes -- that guy must have a pretty robust budget.
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 9:47 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 10-12-13 2:19 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I have a friend who makes some really nice turquoise jewelry
(http
might have had much the same reaction. It would
be interesting to see their reactions on a return trip in 20 years, when
they're able to fully process the scale of the atrocity.
Thanks for sharing this.
-- Walt
On 12/14/2010 4:50 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Just stepping out, so I can't watch
Very happy to hear this excellent news, Stan!
Enjoy the wine and serenity.
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 8:30 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
After some processing delays and a bit of phone tag, I finally got the
pathology results today from my prostate surgery 2+ weeks ago. All very
positive - the
Excellent shots, Subash! Congratulations!
-- Walt
On 12/15/2010 9:33 PM, Subash wrote:
well, i went and did it too. :)
i had submitted a few photos a couple of times earlier, i think once in
2008 and once again in 2009 and all the photos got rejected both the
times. about a month ago i
Dammit, Frank. I'm sorry to hear that happened to you.
The world has a way of dealing with cowards like that. I suppose that's
the only consolation available to you at the moment.
I'm glad it wasn't as severe as it could've been, and hope you heal up
quickly and without too much pain.
Wow! Looks like the traffic for the t-shirts has crashed the site!
On 12/16/2010 10:04 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Dwayne's Photo in Parsons, KS, the last lab in the world to develop
the legendary Kodachrome film, has on sale Kodachrome memorial
t-shirts.
http://www.dwaynesphoto.com/
Yep ... looks like they're back up and running now. It was completely
down when I first clicked the link, and for about 10 minutes afterward.
They may have been doing some site maintenance, I reckon.
-- Walt
On 12/16/2010 10:34 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Working fine for me. ;-)
On
Hi all,
Just wanted to share this link with y'all and hope you enjoy it as much
as I did.
What is it about jazz that makes for such compelling photography?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/pictureshow/2010/12/16/132108519/leonard?sc=fbcc=fp
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yikes! Yeah, that's a bit much -- particularly on the girl with the
freckles.
-- Walt
On 12/17/2010 7:25 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I understand the need to overly touch up portraits, but the software
Portrait Magic Professional Actions removes all evidence that the
person has skin. Am I
The '63 has been my dream car since I was a child. I know
everyone has opinions about Corvettes -- and their owners. But, as far
as I'm concerned, it's one of the most beautiful cars ever made.
-- Walt
On 12/17/2010 3:48 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Wasn't the split window on a 63?
Kenneth
That would explain it. I do wish I lived in a time and place where
there were more opportunities to take photographs like this.
On 12/17/2010 9:12 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/12/17 Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com:
What is it about jazz that makes for such compelling photography?
simple.
Ironically enough, when I posted a link to your Canadians Wearing
Hats photo blog to my Facebook page, I mentioned to one of the people
who commented on it that you had the good fortune of living in Canada,
where you can take photos of strangers on the street and stand a
reasonable chance
Just wondered if anyone might have any ideas regarding a good way to
shoot the upcoming convergence between the winter solstice and lunar
eclipse.
http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/Solstice+eclipse+first+years/3983582/story.html
I have some Wiccan friends I might surprise with a photo of
to look into
getting a nicer one soon.
Thanks for the response. Now that I've found a few videos about it,
I'll just do some experimentation over the next week to see if I can get
the hang of it.
-- Walt
On 12/18/2010 5:11 PM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
At 3:20 PM -0600 12/18/10, Walter Gilbert wrote
I have the same issue with the images coming out pretty dark, but I
always just assumed that had more to do with the brightness of the LCD.
I turn that down as far as I can to give me a reasonable expectation of
what my shot's going to look like, though it's still considerably
brighter
Nice shot, Paul. I like the sense of resignation in the guy's
posture. Very telling.
You didn't happen to get any shots focused on the girl on the right, I
take it. She looks quite fetching -- like I've had a few drinks.
-- Walt
On 12/19/2010 9:36 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
An
I was thinking the very same thing.
Very nice.
-- Walt
On 12/19/2010 12:06 PM, Bob W wrote:
Very nicely done. I think a photographer must have designed that path.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Damn. Voluptuous is my favorite.
On 12/19/2010 4:19 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Nice shot, Paul. I like the sense of resignation in the guy's posture.
Very telling.
You didn't happen to get any shots focused on the girl on the right, I
Welcome, Andy! I enjoyed looking through your work! I've had the
same experience you've had regarding the overall pace of the forums as
opposed to what goes on here. As I see it, I can go anywhere and be
called an idiot, so I figure I might as well confine it to a more
tight-knit circle.
Sorry to hear about the knee surgery. Hope it proceeds smoothly from
here on and that you're able to rest comfortably soon.
-- Walt
On 12/19/2010 4:59 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Interesting image. Best wishes for a full and complete recovery.
Dan
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:40 PM,
1 - 100 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
