is currently very busy.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 11:51 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
The biggest issue is going to be 'will it build' on those releases.
The tcl version deal (with tcl prior to 8.1)
Tom applied a patch so that the build will continue to work on 8.0.x
On Thursday 13 November 2003 12:09 am, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 23:44, Lamar Owen wrote:
My hands are somewhat tied at the present to only supporting what I
actively run. That is currently RHL 8.0 and Fedora Core 1. (not 1.0,
incidentally; there is no minor version
is good for PostgreSQL.
And he is getting paid to do it, unlike me.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 12:02 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Lamar Owen writes:
And he is getting paid to do it, unlike me.
That's news to me. :-)
Reinhard Max is getting paid to do it, not you. Bad english on my part.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical
this mail and gets the time to build them, as he has already asked to help do
this. I have RH 8.0 at my disposal, and will build those. I will also be
building Aurora 1.0 packages.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
On Friday 21 November 2003 01:13 pm, Lamar Owen wrote:
I have uploaded a first cut at the RPM's to ftp.postgresql.org. While I am
not 100% convinced of the need to do so, I have restructured the
directories, and await comment on that.
I expect RH 7.3, RH9, and RH 6.2 packages shortly from
this; but at the moment it is manual. The spec file
does check the build89 macro, and, if defined, throws in the right value for
kerberos.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end
. This will
just be spec file changes, probably, unless another bug appears in the
initscript.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast
and be Fedora Core based.
So, I ask, why change something that is going to work every time to something
that may very well break silently in the future? (yes, I know about the
performance difference; is the increased performance worth the tradeoff?)
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information
On Saturday 29 November 2003 01:07 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The project lead for the Aurora SPARC Linux project is who recommended it
in the first place;
We were told equally positively, by equally well-informed persons, that
we should prefer -fpic if at all
installed at the same time. I am
investigating the best way of correcting this without breaking too many
things.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 06:29 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
You need to specify that you are building for Red Hat 9 on the command
I'll try.
Ok.
PS: the 7.4 will be remembered as the longest release to be developed
and for the longest period needed in order to have
; in fact, I have delayed release of the
7.3.5 RPMset because of this. I'd love to check it out with 7.3.5.
(however, real work keeps getting in the way today; it may be a tonight
thing, with the upload to happen tomorrow).
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical
that Red Hat has in its enterprise directory). That box isn't a
devel box, but I am building up (while I'm on vacation) a devel box. So I'll
be building RPMs on that box with WBEL which should install on RHEL3.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1
do it tomorrow, or is may be better do it for the 7.4.1 ?
If you'll hold off a few days both 7.4.1 and 7.3.5 RPMs are due to be
released. At that point building on various distributions and setting up
torrents will be done.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical
. The space taken
by binaries is significant (about 1GB at this point). Since we are keeping
all source releases (although I would question that, since we use CVS),
keeping all the binaries around is just a space waster, IMHO.
Comments?
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah
On Monday 19 January 2004 03:53 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am looking at the possibility of cleaning up the binary tree on the ftp
site, and was wondering what the group thought about purging old
binaries. What I was thinking would be to remove all
still among us. And this wouldn't touch the source releases at
all.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7
children through this
difficult time.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your
move those files over to 7.3.6 ...
Please, don't call it 7.3.6. Streamlining releases is terrible. 7.3.7 or
7.3.6.1 or SOMETHING other than 7.3.6, and just let 7.3.6 be a brown paper
bag release (like 6.4.1 was).
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research
tarballs have been streamlined. I'm glad I hadn't
built any RPMs yet.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8
On Friday 05 March 2004 09:50 am, Mark Gibson wrote:
How about in future, packaging it all up as a release candidate,
(ie. 7.4.2-rc1) for a week or so before official final release,
We do this already for major versions. Maybe we should consider this for
minors too.
--
Lamar Owen
Director
sure we have more reports about upgrading than logging.
But see my reply to bug 103767 for more.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast
On Friday 12 March 2004 03:21 pm, Fernando Nasser wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
Uh, we have many many many different ways to use syslog. So my other
message on the topic.
Which other message?
The one I didn't post. :-)
Anyway, Syslog is not an option for us. We need flat files.
Ok, riddle
. But, if Red Hat wants to pay Tom to do it... :-)
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading
better than 7.3.x in that respect?
There are several levels documented in postgresql.conf. Try the terse level
and see what happens.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
PostgreSQL and plPHP, then tell me how you
solved the circular dependency.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9
how
you solved the circular dependency.
Actually plPHP doesn't require the PostgreSQL source tree... you would
just have to modify the Make file to point to the right places.
Then it can easily be a standalone project, and the issues go away.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
first (she's at 37 weeks and having
Braxton-Hicks already). #4.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED
versus mktime
fix) might be doable, but might not depending upon the particular fix, how
difficult the packport, etc. But 7.2 is considered _stable_ -- and I agree
that this means maintenance mode only. Only the most trivial or the most
serious problems should be tackled here.
--
Lamar Owen
the
cookie. I'll certainly try to do my part.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. In the meantime we have pg_upgrade
for the future 7.3 - 7.4 upgrade.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
;
it will depend on how much upload bandwidth I can get out of this dialup. It
appears to be running OK, so I may let it run.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:29 am, Lamar Owen wrote:
RPMs will be uploaded either tonight or tomorrow morning after I get to
work; it will depend on how much upload bandwidth I can get out of this
dialup. It appears to be running OK, so I may let it run.
After I get to work. Too many
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:46 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Builds fine here for RPM usage. Got an odd diff in the triggers
regression test: did we drop a NOTICE? If so, the regression output
should probably have been changed too. The diff
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:29 am, Lamar Owen wrote:
RPMs will be uploaded either tonight or tomorrow morning after I get to
work; it will depend on how much upload bandwidth I can get out of this
dialup. It appears to be running OK, so I may let it run.
RPMS uploaded into the usual
On Thursday 03 October 2002 02:31 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that confuses me though is that the build options have been
like this for a long time (at least since 7.1). Why haven't you seen
this problem before? Did you recently change the way the RPMs
, etc...) If not someone from the PostgreSQL
marketing dept. (wink wink) should come up with a press release.
I have submitted a story to LinuxToday. We'll see how that goes. Anyone want
to take on Slashdot? :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end
duplicates other
packages...
Let ye-old package managers make a shell package which simply points to
the others as dependencies.
I'm going to attempt to do up RPMs of all those :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
build is a difficult one; and is going
away at 7.3 anyway -- there will be a separate perl build.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
achieve greater and greater success in the coming years.
Thomas, good luck.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
replacement pool consists
of people who are already doing development now. Having an odd number of
core has its advantages.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister
perhaps 2-4 times a year.
OK sorry - I was under the impression that core == commit bit...
committers != core
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http
. Oh, and we also have
www.postgresql.org on the side? I think not. Oh, and they are fractured in
their styles -- really, guys, we need a unified style here.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3
it -- and at 33.6 dialup (that's bouncing up
and down like a yoyo due to periodic telephone service interruptions) a 10MB
file takes a little time to upload (as in a couple of hours or more), and
it's an insignificant change.):
%changelog
* Wed Dec 04 2002 Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- 7.3-0.5PGDG
- Jerk
On Thursday 05 December 2002 09:37, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Lamar Owen wrote:
However, I seriously question the need in the long term for our sites to
be as fractured as they are. Good grief! We've got
note that altho they are seperate URLs, the end result is going
was due to the collation of a result, and a side-effect of the
way the RPM regression testing is performed); but I did not try a restart of
the postmaster.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked
there were cases that this would not be true.
Support != 'if you pass the right parameters to configure this will work', at
least not at the press release level.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe
releases, I was retained by Great
Bridge to produce RPMs -- that ensured that I spent time on them for that
cycle.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister
Thanks to those who did the PostgreSQL Weekly news, and submitted it to
LinuxToday. This is a great function for the advocacy people! Many Thanks!
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9
, I knew Sander was building these, so
I specifically got up early to handle this.
And I want to thank Sander for building these RPMs.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands
, but that just gets under
my skin.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get
On Thursday 02 January 2003 19:26, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I figured I'd roll a 7.1.3 RPMset for him to install onto Red Hat 8.
It was very bad. It simply would not build -- I guess it's the gcc 3
stuff.
If you don't know *exactly* why it doesn't build, I
On Friday 03 January 2003 15:16, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday 02 January 2003 19:26, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen Wrote
THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN WITH MySQL.
Oh? Do they have a crystal ball that lets them predict incompatible
future platform changes?
No, they just allow for the old format
(which composition and membership changes frequently)
that there's a problem waiting to be solved.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, that will help
buy some breathing room from my point of view.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Sunday 05 January 2003 23:10, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is very possible that the supporting libc shared libraries
will be removed by the OS upgrade -- the old binaries may not even run
when it is critical that they do run.
Urgh, that's a mess.
Yah
that could be traced to libpq not being threadsafe. And
AOLserver certainly would show a non-threadsafe problem, particularly with
sites running OpenACS, which can easily beat the database to death.
BTW: thanks for the Bison RPMs. And I believe the PGDG is appropriate as
well. :-)
--
Lamar Owen
heard of more bizarre things, though.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
separate
projects, even though the driver has hooks in it for OpenACS use. The
OpenACS sample tcl config shows how to load the nspostgres driver (even
though it may call it 'postgres' instead).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
is to use the 7.2 psql with the 7.2
backends...and enjoy the thrills of upgrading.
Methinks 7.3 should have been 8.0 with all the changes that have happened.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe
.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
, has anyone else noticed the security update onslaught from Red
Hat for older PostgreSQL versions? They even backported the fixes to 6.5.3
from Red Hat 6.2 (as well as for 7.0 and 7.1 as released in the respective
Red Hat Linux versions). Should I forward that notice here?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR
On Saturday 18 January 2003 00:08, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Incidentally, has anyone else noticed the security update onslaught from
Red Hat for older PostgreSQL versions? They even backported the fixes to
6.5.3 from Red Hat 6.2 (as well as for 7.0 and 7.1
On Saturday 18 January 2003 11:13, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... Why? If a user doesn't need the features of 7.x.x, and the codebase
is working well for him/her, why should said user/DBA feel compelled to
go through who knows what mechanations to upgrade
1986 through 1989. Enjoy the light
traffic, Bruce... :-)
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
:
up2date
This will start an interactive process that will result in the appropriate
RPMs being upgraded on your system.
5. RPMs required:
[omitted]
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all
to Microsoft.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the MS SQL Server
Sapphire worm for reference.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:06, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Saturday 25 January 2003 20:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
improve the capabilities of the database. For security issues, if we
already have ten open doors in a house, does it help to lock two of
them when
On Thursday 30 January 2003 16:54, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And, by the way, who in their right mind tests a database server by
repeated yanking of the AC power?
Anybody who would like their data to survive a power outage.
I don't buy that. That's why I have
. Records are meant to be broken.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Thursday 30 January 2003 15:29, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While I understand (and agree with) your (and Vince's) reasoning on why
Windows should be considered less reliable, neither of you have provided
Windows shares none of that heritage. It is the first
, some palmitic acidmight be fun to sling some
napalm in the back yard to rid the place of weeds, and get some relaxation to
boot).
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through
tests?'). I for one don't want that to be a
conclusion -- but the 'suits' will see it that way, rest assured.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there will just love this statement.
The linux community here is in the minority, more than likely, to the *BSD
camp.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http
supported on that platform.'
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Thursday 30 January 2003 13:17, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
Vince, I would say that we, the developers of PostgreSQL, are then not
qualified to test our own releases for the reasons you mentioned that
Katie should not test her own releases.
Don't twist
translation of the site so one who doesn't speak or write
Japanese can try it out?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
checksums ...
Actually this impacts RPMs more than the tarball, although the tarball's md5
sums are important. I have been intending to do this for some time; maybe
it's time to bite the bullet.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
pg_controldata.1 pg_restore.1psql.1
createuser.1 initdb.1pg_ctl.1 pgtclsh.1 vacuumdb.1
dropdb.1 initlocation.1 pg_dump.1 pgtksh.1
[lowen@localhost BUILD]$
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast
are to be preferred only if the distributor doesn't have updated
ones.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
trust this group, if any of you have had experience dealing with
credit collection bureaus and the like, can you please e-mail me privately
with your experience?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 20:56, Lamar Owen wrote:
Being that this group of hackers is one I trust, and that this is a pretty
common scenario for contract programming, I thought I'd ask this group a
question. I hope you don't mind.
I want to thank everyone for their responses. We will see
It is the ONE TRUE PLACE [snip]
If PostgreSQL is supported as a part of the base operating system in a Linux
distribution, and that distribution wishes to be Linux Standards Base
compliant (most do), then PostgreSQL cannot go in /usr/local -- period.
IDIC at work.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
think it is
for the better; YMMV.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 13 February 2003 21:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
It isn't without precedent to have a directory under /var/run. Maybe
/var/run/postgresql. Under this one could have a uniquely named pid
file.
But how do you handle the default then, where you have postmaster.pid
. It's an interlock for
PGDATA. So it might be argued that postmaster.pid is misnamed.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
on in client connections). But I do advocate _allowing_ the
configuration options Mark has enumerated -- although I really wish we could
use the lowercase c instead, for consistency with other OS services.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end
of the OS. If it isn't, well, it isn't.
This is so that local admin installed (from source -- not from binary package)
files don't get clobbered by the next operating system binary upgrade. In
that context the FHS (LSB) mandate makes lots of sense.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
On Thursday 13 February 2003 18:41, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Lamar Owen wrote:
PostgreSQL is as critical as PHP, Apache, or whatever other package is
being backended by PostgreSQL. If the package is provided by the
distributor, consider it part of the OS. If it isn't
of PostgreSQL is on topic for -hackers. IMNSHO.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
of sendmail.cf: so, yes,
you can run multiple instances, although it could be argued that it wasn't
designed in.
Next?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http
On Thursday 13 February 2003 20:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Lamar Owen wrote:
This isn't the same environment, Bruce, that you got into back when it
was still Postgres95.
So you are saying this isn't my grandma's database anymore. :-)
I actually thought of saying it that way, too
know the historical reason)?
Comments?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
On Saturday 15 February 2003 20:19, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just exactly why does initdb need to drop any config files anywhere?
Because we'd like it to edit the correct datadir into the config file,
to take just the most obvious example.
Shouldn't we
On Saturday 15 February 2003 21:06, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shouldn't we be consistent and have initdb use the datadir set in the
config file, which could be supplied by a ./configure switch?
That'd mean there is no way to perform an initdb into a nonstandard
On Sunday 16 February 2003 00:16, Tom Lane wrote:
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would you mind elucidating which point of view is yours?
Primarily, one that wants to have multiple postmasters running, of the
same or different versions; including test and temporary installations
by either win32 or PITR. And think of this crazy
scenario: We release an 8.0 with PITR, then need either a 8.1 or a 9.0
with a FE/BE overhaul, then need a possible 10.0 because we've added
win32... yuk.
FWIW, the 6.4 protocol change didn't force a move from 6.3.2 to 7.0.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR
1 - 100 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
