[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.7

Sounds good to me - I will set aside some time to work on QA. --zak - Original Message - From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 12:48 PM Subject: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.7 > As those of you who are subscribed to p

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #12308 Updated: want to know the email address of the surfer

Hey Andy, Fast, but not fast enough... ;) IIRC 'closed' is the status to set for bugs that have been resolved, while 'bogus' is the status for bug reports that are not actually bugs. --zak - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 200

Re: [PHP-DEV] Setting title with header ?

Dear Beric, This list is used for discussing the development of the PHP language - not development with and the use of the PHP language. Try the PHP-General mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). --zak - Original Message - From: "Beric Slobodan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

Re: [PHP-DEV] passing variables from forms to the same page repetatively

Hi Tim, This list is for discussing the development of the PHP language, rather than discussing developing with the PHP language. Please try the PHP General mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --zak - Original Message - From: "Tim Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent:

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Bug #12183 Updated: ISSET

Alex wrote: > No this script doesn't. But on BSD works !isset better :). > For my work with ISS and sometimes PWS(just testing). > Thnx :o) Hi Alex, I don't understand this message very well. Could you rephrase it? :) Also, do you have a script that reproduces the error you

Re: [PHP-DEV] How to convert a string into a mathematical expression?

But *very* dangerous! :) If the user passed malicious code in the string, all heck could break loose. You will need to ensure that user input is filtered before being passed to eval. Also, the Dev list is for discussing development of the PHP language, not development with - this discussion would

Re: [PHP-DEV] Programmer with 2+ year Experience

Dear Lylesh, This mailing list is for discussing issues relating to the development of PHP. Visit http://www.php.net/links.php to find links to job sites. --zak - Original Message - From: "Lylesh Vijay Menezes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 1

[PHP-DEV] Fw: using hebrevc with hebrew & english

situation? Thanks! --zak - Original Message - From: "Barak Shimoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Zak Greant'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:25 AM Subject: RE: using hebrevc with hebrew & english Hi, First I would like to

Re: [PHP-DEV] [UPDATE] NGScan

Sascha wrote: > > > I'd like to see Sascha's attitude change, ideally. > > > > Ok - Sascha, do you think that your attitude is a problem? > > I don't think that bears an answer Really - do you not perceive this situation as a group problem? > considering the contents of this th

Re: [PHP-DEV] [UPDATE] NGScan

Zeev wrote: > Zak Greant wrote: > >Zeev wrote: > > > Rasmus wrote: > > > > So please stop with the personal attacks and > > > >concentrate on the real technical issues. > > > > > > I'd appreciate it if you stayed out of this

Re: [PHP-DEV] [UPDATE] NGScan

Zeev wrote: > Rasmus wrote: > > So please stop with the personal attacks and > >concentrate on the real technical issues. > > I'd appreciate it if you stayed out of this one Quoting from a previous message: > I'd be happy to hear what other people think about 'you vs. me'. You did

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11890 Updated: linux exploitable

Derick wrote: > As far as I can see does shell_arg only escape the ' and shell_cmd the > following characters: #&;`'\"|*?~<>^()[]{}$\\\x0A\xFF so I think > _shell_cmd would be the best choice. This is probably a nit-picking point that I should not have wasted your time with. :) Here was m

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11890 Updated: linux exploitable

Derick wrote: > Hello Zak, > > regarding this problem with the mail() function, I have a fix here where > the 5th parameter will be shell escaped (with php_shell_escape_cmd()). I > didn't commit it yet (because of ISP troubles), but if nobody thinks this > is a bad idea, I'll commit it tomorrow.

Re: [PHP-DEV] foreach behavior and error suppression (@foo)

Perhaps we want to roll this request into the list of proposed changes for PHP 5? --zak - Original Message - From: "Daniel Beckham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "php-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:16 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] foreach behavior and error suppression (@foo)

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Corrected protos for basic_functions.c

Corrections of broken proto comments in basic_functions.c Also converted proto boolean to proto bool --zak Index: basic_functions.c === RCS file: /repository/php4/ext/standard/basic_functions.c,v retrieving revision 1.353 diff -u -

Re: [PHP-DEV] Tidying up the language

Howdy Phil, Phil wrote: > In the light of Zend's proposal for a version 2 of the Zend Engine, now is > probably a good time to discuss whether we can and/or should use the > opportunity to also tidy up the language along the lines we discussed on this > list a few months ago namely: > > Make func

[PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] Don't loose sight of the big picture

Zeev wrote: [snip] > >On another matter, does the big change to the engine mark a good time to make > >a concerted effort on tidying the language up a bit? I refer to the business > >of case sensitivity for function names, consistency with the order of > >arguments to functions, and consistency ac

Re: [PHP-DEV] Assert callback handlers

And it would be more consistent with how the other callback handlers and function invokers are implemented. --zak - Original Message - From: "Jon Parise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thurs

[PHP-DEV] Assert callback handlers

Hello All, Can anyone see any problems with adding array (&$object, 'method') syntax to the assert handler functionality? If not, I will submit a patch to add it in the next week. (unless someone beats me to it ;) --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-

[PHP-DEV] Extra Karma

Hello All, Could I get karma to modify the source? I have a bunch of broken protos to fix - I am sick of looking at them in the docs. ;) --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: [PHP-DEV] is_scalar

Hi Andi, Thanks for the clarification - I have noted it in the function writeup. --zak - Original Message - From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 9:59 PM S

[PHP-DEV] is_scalar

Hello All, I was just reviewing the is_scalar() function and noted that the function does not consider resources to be scalar values. Shouldn't this be changed? I must have missed this when I initially wrote the function... Zak Greant Freelance Designer / Programmer / Writer PHP QA

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug #11562 Updated: PHP crashes everytime with little syntax error

> http://www.zend.com/shapshots/ : page not found Try http://www.zend.com/snapshots/ --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [PHP-DEV] bug/dev

Colin wrote > > I know the lists are just back online, so I shouldn't be making feature > > requests ... but it would be nice if the bug reports had their own mailing > > list instead of being sent to the dev list. > > > > I can see why you might not want this (dev people work on bugs), but I'm >

[PHP-DEV] Did RMS bury the hatchet?

Hello All, Did RMS come to terms with the PHP/Zend licensing structure? I was just browsing the software directory over at GNU and ran across: http://gnu.sunsite.utk.edu/directory/php.html --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11054 Updated: not a but, but feature request

Errr... u... I should go to bed now... Thanks Derick! --zak - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:18 AM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bug #11054 Updated: not a but, but feature request > ID: 11054 > Updated by: derick > Reported

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] Patch to add constants for the connection handling functions

Sterling wrote: > Zak Greant wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > I posted this little patch to the dev list, but I think that > > it got lost in the 'ding dong' kafuffle. :) > > > > It adds three constants (CONNECTION_NORMAL, CONNECTI

Re: [PHP-DEV] Lame support for win32 mail() function -rant

RAOTFLOLPMP! Go Sterling, go! Kick some stinky troll butt - kick it, kick it! :D --zak - Original Message - From: "Sterling Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Lame support for win32 mail()

[PHP-DEV] [PATCH] Patch to add constants for the connection handling functions

Hello All, Here is a little patch to add constants for the connection handling functions. Zak Greant Freelance Designer / Programmer / Writer PHP QA Team Member http://qa.php.net/ Canadian? Interested in the environment? Please visit http://www.energyrevolution.net/ Am I working on a

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Velocis Support in PHP 4

Andi Gutmans wrote: > At 02:45 PM 5/15/2001 -0600, Zak Greant wrote: > >...uh... I just managed to build with Velocis support. I did a full > >reinstall of PHP and Velocis... sigh... > > > >Oh well, it is better to be wrong about a problem, than to have a problem. >

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Velocis Support in PHP 4

...uh... I just managed to build with Velocis support. I did a full reinstall of PHP and Velocis... sigh... Oh well, it is better to be wrong about a problem, than to have a problem. :) --zak - Original Message - From: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL P

[PHP-DEV] Velocis Support in PHP 4

Andi wrote: > >Building with Velocis support enabled fails with many syntax errors. Should > >Velocis support be stripped from PHP 4? > > Hmm, why? Isn't anyone using it? Has it been broken for a long time? AFAICT it has been broken for some time. I will take a closer look at it and see if I ca

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] PHP 4.0.6RC1 ready for testing

Andi wrote: > I rolled 4.0.6RC1. It is ready for testing. > http://www.php.net/~andi/php-4.0.6RC1.tar.gz > > Please everyone take sometime to make sure this is release worthy :) Hurray! :) Successful build on Mandrake 7.1 Basic scripts run w/o issues Building with Velocis support enabled fails

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10808: I can instal PHP on PWS 4 Server Error: HTTP 500 internal server error

The bug form is not the proper place for setup problems. Please send your question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --zak - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:42 AM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10808: I can instal PHP on PWS 4 Server Error:

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Linux on S/390

James Moore wrote: > Zak, > > I suggest that one of the QA Team Members signs up for an account, > preferably someone who has a decent amount of experiance of debugging on > Linux we could then use the system to verify bugs/run RC tests on the > server. Any of the QA Team Members/Developers willi

[PHP-DEV] Linux on S/390

Hello All, Anyone have an interest in this? IBM Linux Community Development System Welcome to the Linux Community Development System (the 'Service'), a Service provided by IBM. The Service provides you with access to a Linux on S/390 environment for the purpose of providing the Open Source commu

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10702: levenshtein doesn't handle odd arguments well

Hartmut wrote: > does it work with all weights set to one or with only two paramerters? > > (i'm really curious about this, but have no windows test system > available) It only seems to do it in the two situations that I noted. I just did a test suite using 100 words and costs of 1 and

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10702: levenshtein doesn't handle odd arguments well

It works just fine for me on GNU/Linux as well. I guess that it is a Win32 specific issue... --zak - Original Message - From: "Hartmut Holzgraefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:28 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10702: lev

Re: [PHP-DEV] php got stomped on in shootout, but shouldn't have...

If you grab the gent's 'shootout' tarball, you will find that there is not a single PHP file in it. This makes it very hard to evaluate. ;) Perhaps write him a pleasant letter and let him know that you lost a contract over his incomplete evaluation. --zak - Original Message - From: "Se

[PHP-DEV] connection_timeout() and PHP 3

Does anyone know if connection_timeout will be disappearing from PHP 3? Zak Greant Freelance Designer / Programmer / Writer PHP QA Team Member http://qa.php.net/ Am I working on a project for or with you? Check http://calendar.yahoo.ca/jagreant -- PHP Development Mailing List <h

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: 4.0.6

Jani wrote: > > Maybe we should have something like the terrorist cells? > ie. groups of 3 persons who know only about the one above them? > >X > __|_ > /\ >a b > / | \ / \ > c (d) e e g > [...] > Wow this sounds like one of my ideas Jani. :) All

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

Andi wrote: > At 01:16 PM 5/2/2001 -0600, Zak Greant wrote: [snip] > I don't think it's too realistic :) > I prefer having the php-general guys test it on their development machine's. Perhaps we should just encourage the brave and foolhardy to run it on

Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] 4.0.6

Andi wrote: [snip] > That was really a big disappointment as people did such a good job on the > release cycle IMO. > No doubt it shouldn't have slipped in. > And if it doesn't get fixed soon we should revert to the old version of the > COM module. How much testing is the QA team actually doi

[PHP-DEV] MySQL problems at bugs.php.net

Hello All, I just noted a problem at bugs.php.net: Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /local/Web/sites/phpweb/bugs.php on line 77 Unable to connect to SQL

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10502 Updated: parsing for HTTP_POST_VARS drops duplicates

Cynic wrote: > Urrgh, yes, > > you're right. Sorry, up all night. None that I know of... > FWIW IIRC there was a feature request quite a long ago... What about HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA - I have seen it bumping around the source[1], but know little about it. Anyone? :) [1] /php4/ma

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug #10502 Updated: parsing for HTTP_POST_VARS drops duplicates

Cynic wrote: [snip] > this is by design. > > take a look at this (you'll have to edit it): > > function _QueryString() > { > $qsstr = '' ; > $qsarr = array() ; > $QS = strtr( $GLOBALS['HTTP_SERVER_VARS']["QUERY_STRING"] , array( '[' => '' , ']' =

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: 4.0.5: Merge Request

No - this is just a coincidence. James and the boys are still looking for a difference name. --zak - Original Message - From: "Rasmus Lerdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 11:41 AM

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.5RC1 install / OmniHTTPd

Zeev Suraski wrote: > http://www.php.net/distributions/RCs/php-4.0.5RC1.tar.gz > > Do your thing :) > > Zeev The 4.0.5 RC1 Win32 binaries run simple scripts on OmniHTTPd 2.8 without issues. --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.5RC1 install / Xitami

Zeev Suraski wrote: > http://www.php.net/distributions/RCs/php-4.0.5RC1.tar.gz > > Do your thing :) > > Zeev The 4.0.5 RC1 Win32 binaries run simple scripts on Xitami 2.4b6 without issues. --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

[PHP-DEV] 4.0.5RC1 build + test report

Zeev Suraski wrote: > http://www.php.net/distributions/RCs/php-4.0.5RC1.tar.gz > > Do your thing :) > > Zeev 4.0.5 RC1 builds and runs on Mandrake 7.1 ./configure \ --disable-pear \ --enable-bcmath \ --enable-calendar \ --enable-dba=shared \ --enable-dbase \ --enable-ftp

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Function Renaming Re-organization

H... well, it looks like I will have to do this after getting some sleep --zak - Original Message - From: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Hellekin O. Wolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Php-

[PHP-DEV] Function Renaming Re-organization

HOW wrote: [snip] > Zak, would you please post an updated version of the renaming scheme, > including the last few days changes, so that we can see things more globally ? > (And refresh the thread's subject ;-) I am just heading out to an appointment. When I get back, I will organize what has go

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Andi Gutmans wrote: > >bzerror returns an array containing the error string and error number. > > Maybe it should be error_info() then? nerk? error seems sufficient to me... > > > >>>Maybe errstr should be changed to errmsg ? (Did I say that elsewhere ? > >;-) > > > >>>As the file extension is .

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Andi wrote: > At 04:34 PM 3/7/2001 +0100, Hellekin O. Wolf wrote: > >At 17:22 07/03/2001 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > >>>*** What is the difference between error ad errstr ? bzerror returns an array containing the error string and error number. > >>>Maybe errstr should be changed to errmsg

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Andi wrote: [snip] > Yep. Let's start doing some damage. bzip2 is a very good victim. bzclose -> bz_close bzcompress -> bz_compress bzdecompress -> bz_decompress bzerrno -> bz_errno bzerror -> bz_error bzerrstr -> bz_errstr bzflush -> bz_flush bzopen -> bz_open bz

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Andi wrote: > At 05:05 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote: > >Andi wrote: > > > >[snip] > >I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this. > > > > > 3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if you &

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Waldschrott wrote: > > Overall I think this is very good. I have a few problems with it (all > > prefixed with a large IMHO :)... > > agreeing in anything sterling mentioned, except and in addition this: > > >> GETTEXT > >> bindtextdomain > >> dcgettext > >> dgettext > >> gettext > >> textdomain

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Sterling wrote: > Overall I think this is very good. I have a few problems with it (all > prefixed with a large IMHO :)... :) > > array_multisort -> array_multi_sort > > nah, doesn't sound as good as array_multisort, multisort should be a single > word... Its a type of sorting method, shouldn't

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Derick Rethans wrote: [snip] > > 6) I think create_function() is OK. There was a long thread which decided > > upon this name. Same for function_exists(). > > Can't we call it lambda()? =) That would make a sensible alias for it. :) --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

HOW wrote: > Well, let's start fire =8) > > I think the compression extensions should follow the same standard. > The one you proposed for bzip2 should be applied to gzip functions as well. > readgzfile -> gz_readfile (or gzreadfile), at least to keep functions names > in alphabetical order ;-) I

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Andi wrote: [snip] I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this. > 3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if you did > the reverse here :) Removing the underscores was the choice that meant the least amount of change for the extension. :) > 4

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Andi wrote: > Can you please resend :) Your wish is my command! :) --zak This message is a duplicate of a post on Saturday, March 03, 2001: Andi wrote: > We should probably just make a list of all the effected functions and see > which ones we start fixing and which not. Based on Andi's sugg

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Hello Everyone, Is anyone bold enough to comment on the suggested names besides Phil? I know that you all have opinions... Don't make me use humor again. This time, I'll make fun of people by name (and by reference - I've got to be thorough) --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Phil wrote: > Prodigious work Zak - well done. This certainly represents a useful > initial tidy up. It doesn't break anything and cures many of the > 'bad offenders'. Thanks Phil - I expect that closer examination will reveal how sloppy it is! :) > In looking through the unchanged function name

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

Andi wrote: > We should probably just make a list of all the effected functions and see > which ones we start fixing and which not. Based on Andi's suggestion of a moderate approach, I feel that the goal of the renaming is to fix the most obvious mistakes with the least amount of change. If an e

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV]ctype function (re?)naming

I post my suggestions later today. :) --zak - Original Message - From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Phil Driscoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stanislav Malyshe

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming

Phil wrote: > Ron - whose postings I normally agree with :-) - wrote: As do I :) [snip] > I know that Zak has been doing some experiments along these lines, but has > also been busy on other projects. Any news to report Zak? I now have less hair that I did before starting. ;) Finding sensible

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming

Richard Lynch wrote: > > It HAS to be time for a big tidy up, as it is clearly impossible to 'do > > the right thing' under current circumstances. > > Problem is, what you see as "untidy" programmers with a background in other > languages and software packages see as "convenient". :-) > > For ever

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] ctype function (re?)naming

Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > JM>> This is not in line with the other is_* functions. To keep in line with > > If you mean ctype functions, I agree - they all should be is*. If you mean > is_integer type functions - so what? It's not in line also with > mysql_num_rows function, so? That's just funct

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9266 Updated: Unable to load 14 of php's extensions

Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > Zak Greant wrote: > > Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote: > > > request for a new bug categorie: misleading error message > > Are there enough of these to warrant a category? > > I think this a question of quality, not quantity. I am just say

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9266 Updated: Unable to load 14 of php's extensions

Are there enough of these to warrant a category? --zak - Original Message - From: "Hartmut Holzgraefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 3:06 PM Subject: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9266 Updated: Unable to load 14

Re: [PHP-DEV] how-to get array[0] and array["name"] to actually reference only 1 value?

sage - From: "Marc Boeren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Zak Greant'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 2:25 AM Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] how-to get array[0] and array["name"] to actually reference only 1 va

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9186 Updated: string compare with "==" does not work correctly

How is this? I modified what Zeev said a wee bit: == is a 'loose' comparison operator [1]. In most cases, this is more convenient - the operator does the right thing without needing any coaxing. In some cases, things will happen that are confusing - particularly when comparing values that have

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9195: Default class function arguments

After doing a few tests and some reading, it looks like the rule is pretty simple: If either expression on either side of a == operator looks like a number, then the value of the expression is converted to a number. --zak - Original Message - From: "Zeev Suraski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9186 Updated: string compare with "==" does not work correctly

Zeev Suraski wrote: > At 17:59 9/2/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >ID: 9186 > >User Update by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Status: Bogus > >Bug Type: Scripting Engine problem > >Description: string compare with "==" does not work correctly > > > >I think there is no reason to convert any type if both >

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9186 Updated: string compare with "==" does not work correctly

Alan van den Bosch wrote: [snip] > This issue arises from the loose typing in PHP with the introduction of > first class boolean type (the true and false keywords), from my > understanding the sematics being applied here are as follows (poetic license > applied liberally); > > == is (has become?)

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9186 Updated: string compare with "==" does not work correctly

As much as I hate to be wrong, I have to say that you are correct. --zak - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:59 AM Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9186 Updated: string compare with "==" does not work correctly > ID: 9

Re: [PHP-DEV] how-to get array[0] and array["name"] to actually reference only 1 value?

This list is for discussing issues that relate to the development of the PHP language. For mailing lists that discuss development with PHP, see www.php.net/support.php Also, even though [0] and ['id'] initially contain the same value, they are not bound together in any way. You may be able to a

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9136: simple script with infinite function calls causes seg fault

Sean wrote: > I am not really sure what we are arguing at this point... Errr... - twitch - well... blush... sigh. Well, I am trying to prove that I lack the basic skill to read email correctly. I followed the thread a bit oddly and thought that you were the original poster. I love things like t

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9136: simple script with infinite function calls causes seg fault

Sean wrote: > Dear Zak: > > Because I don't consider it a problem that needs solving. I am probably > overlooking some notoriously famous algorithm, but I can't think of a valid > reason for such functionality to exist unless someone is purposely trying to > bring a system to its knees. I don't

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 4.0 Bug #9136: simple script with infinite function calls causes seg fault

Dear Sean, Your resume indicates that you have a wealth of skills that can be applied to this problem. It would also seem that you understand the open source ethic. Why would you not look at solving the problem yourself? --zak - Original Message - From: "Sean R. Bright" <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request

You do not need a CVS account for learning PHP. The PHP CVS repository has read-only access that anyone can use - visit http://bugs.php.net/anoncvs.php for more information. --zak - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 4:

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Changes in bug system..

Derik Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Sascha Schumann wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Jani Taskinen wrote: >>> The emails sent by the bug system now have a note >>> about _not_ replying to the emails but using the web interface instead. >>> >>> I would like to see that everybody who handles the

Re: [PHP-DEV] Karma request

If we are adding everyone anyway then we should put in: joey,sniper,torben --zak - Original Message - From: "Andrei Zmievski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Zak Greant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:22 P

Re: [PHP-DEV] Karma request

James Moore and Torben for sure. I have asked the QA team members (who already have CVS access) if they would like access as well. --zak Andrei Zmievski wrote: > Ok, you got it. Let me know if just you or the whole QA team needs > access to qaweb. -- PHP Development Mailing List

[PHP-DEV] Karma request

Anyone care to grant me enough karma to update qaweb? :) --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Resurrecting the Function Renaming Thread

Anyone else want to pipe in on this thread? I believe that the naming is still a significant issue. Just last week Jim - Jim fer diety's sake - made the is_set != isset mistake. All that I am trying to do is get a group concensus so that I can get some work done. :) --zak -- PHP Development M

[PHP-DEV] phpweb karma reguest

Access denied: Insufficient Karma (zak|phpweb/manual) Anyone care to grant me enough karma to work on the php website? :) --zak -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To contact

[PHP-DEV] Notice: Resurrecting the Function Naming Thread

Hello All, I am trying to resurrect the function renaming thread that died out around New Years Day. I have summarized the old thread and posted the summary to the php-qa list. After sorting through all of the messages in the old thread that spanned across 3 different lists, I thought that it m

[PHP-DEV] Notice: Resurrecting the Function Naming Thread

Hello All, I am trying to resurrect the function renaming thread that died out around New Years Day. I have summarized the old thread and posted the summary to the php-qa list. After sorting through all of the messages in the old thread that spanned across 3 different lists, I thought that it m

Re: [PHP-DEV] changing the bug emails slightly

As for the new bug system - I have not yet managed to free up the cycles needed to work on it. Regarding the changes: I did not see any problems with them. However, you use the system much more than most of us. I suppose the important questions are: What information do we need to know from

Re: [PHP-DEV] Scope of set_time_limit

hat this is a bit rough - does anyone have anything to add to clarify it? --zak Zeev wrote: > Right - as I said, the executed program will go on running, whereas the > script will terminate... > > At 01:44 16/1/2001, Zak Greant wrote: > >Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > BTW, o

Re: [PHP-DEV] Scope of set_time_limit

, exiting with this message: /var/yp/binding Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 1 second exceeded in /home/zak/public_html/stl.php on line 6 It looks like the time limit does not apply to the executed program... --zak > > Zeev > > At 07:17 15/1/2001, Zak Greant w

[PHP-DEV] Scope of set_time_limit

A recent note added to the manual errata pointed out the set_time_limit does not affect system commands that have been executed by PHP. I would guess that attempting to limit system behavior in this way is beyond the scope of set_time_limit. Any opinions or options on this issue? My feeling i

[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] Re: [PHP-DEV] 4.0.4pl1 RC2 rolled

The lists seem to be up. I am just working a messed up schedule right now - I will grab the RC and build it shortly. --zak Phil Driscoll wrote: > Built on NT4 SP6. Tested with all my php stuff plus phorum + phpmyadmin on > IIS4 and Apache 1.3.12. > NB not tested anything to do with PDF! > > No

<    1   2