fying the patch.
>From what I understand, jonas was offering 1. When short-form dh is
used, _any_ modification to debian/rules needs understanding of short
form dh. So he is saying that he will no longer offer help for cases
like this one, which can be solved by features either in CDBS or in
tested than 1.1.1. Commenting on Launchpad bug #636473, I'm all
>> for having 1.1.2 in Maverick.
>
> What could help is to file bugreports against the package currently
> targeted testing, and then tag those bugs as closed by the newer
> release. That is the easiest way to help the re
On 12/09/10 16:04, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 21:44 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 29/08/10 19:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 00:11 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>> On Aug 21, 2010, at
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Current csound cannot build on non-linux archs. Please remove the really
old version currently available in hurd-i386.
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.
d \
>>>>> debian/pd-wiimote/usr/lib/pd/extra/wiimote/wiimote.pd_linux
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess is that this is needed in order to properly strip
>>>>> the .pd_linux so binaries?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, dh_str
f so, what trouble?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
sr/lib/lib*.so.*
> +usr/lib*/lib*.so.*
Debian packages must not install stuff under lib64. That is one of the
few differences between debian and the FHS.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maint
On 02/09/10 14:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 09:40 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 01/09/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> this package has been tried four times and every time we see a different
>>> build error:
>>>
>>>
On 02/09/10 11:52, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 17:37:12 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> I find the subject lines very uninformative. I would like to change it
>> to this format:
>>
>> $repository/$branch: $commitmsg
>>
>> where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I find the subject lines very uninformative. I would like to change it
to this format:
$repository/$branch: $commitmsg
where $commitmsg is the first line of the commit message.
What do you think?
- --
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-BEGIN PGP
ave a wiimote-0.3.1.dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
> created or something.
>
The correct approach is to have upstream fix this, not us. In the
current workflow, touching the upstream branch for stuff other than
merging upstream versions is wrong IMO.
- --
Saludos,
Fel
build failure and by this point I think this
is not a bug in csound. Note that I have built the package successfully
on smetana, and Adrian Knoth also did on a machine of his own. Should I
upload the package and close the bug?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
_
r will do the right thing.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On 29/08/10 19:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 00:11 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> (Please don't CC me)
>>> On 21/08/10 18:02, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
gt;> Since the recommended way is not working, I guess it is OK to call
>> dpkg-shlibdeps directly in the pd-packages (as you, Hans, did in
>> pd-motex and pd-pmpd)? Or what do you (all) think?\
>
> That sounds very familiar. I think I tried dh_shlibdeps first also, and
> then we
x27;s csound.
also, debian/copyright_hints is listed in include_binaries (?).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinf
ly for .so-files. I haven't
> figured out what trickery was used in the gem package to let it find
> also .pd_linux-files. But having a plain .pd-linux file in the temporary
> directory and running dh_shlibdeps doesn't produce anything useful.
You can pass additional arguments
r your help. Am I supposed to have already access to
> git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia?
>
> I think I don't. My username on alioth is rdz-guest.
>
Now you do. Welcome to the team!
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maint
of dh_makeshlibs. The file is generally created
> during runtime of debian/rules, but policy does not require that dynamics.
Note that if you provide a symbols file, the shlibs file is redundant
(see dpkg-shlibdeps(1)).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
__
SONAME (the 7.0.0 part after liblo.so). If a
project does not provide a SONAME, then please tell upstream to start
doing so, or just package it as a private library.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-mai
ot;, then instead use this:
>
> libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev
>
No. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are
trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev).
We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just
build-depend on libjack-dev.
--
Saludos,
F
h before
> git-buildpackage if this option is not recommended)
It is not necessary to do git-buildpackage to test a change.
Also, to avoid this very problem, I set in my ~/.gbp.conf
export-dir=../build-area
So it will build in a clean directory, and not touch my working tree.
--
Saludos,
On 23/08/10 11:34, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 07:14:11PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> I can't install jack2 in my development box... Or is some other way to
>> do this?
>
> Yeah, that's a problem. I added libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-de
> +*.pd_linux
> +.pc
I can't think of any reason not to do this... but we don't seem to have
this in any of our other packages (or at least, most). Any reason why we
haven't done this before?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
(Please don't CC me)
On 21/08/10 18:02, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 15:45 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 21/08/10 15:10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok, so we got pd-motex uploaded, and I've been applying all the feedb
loading the
release will tag it.
2. Perhaps it would be good to install the pdf manual?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
(No need to CC me)
On 20/08/10 22:35, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Ready for uploading :)
Uploaded.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.or
On 19/08/10 21:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM
nk. What's the
>>> best way to remove the file? I could patch the Makefile to remove
>>> the line in 'make install' that installs LICENSE.txt the add a link
>>> in debian/links. Is there some easy/proper way in debhelper to just
>>> re
ons is the best move (as opposed to making 1 big source package
that builds several binary packages)...
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.deb
Standards-Version: 3.8.0
> Vcs-Browser: http://slavepianos.org/rd/r/d/darcsweb.cgi?r=jack.*;a=summary
>
Remember to add yourself as Uploaders
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.al
I can't install jack2 in my development box... Or is some other way to
do this?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/lis
On 18/08/10 15:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:42:19 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
>>
>> * audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
>
> Does it m
On 18/08/10 12:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> So, what are interesting multimedia tasks? I'm thinking:
>>
>> * audio production: sound synthesis, audio editing, sequencing.
>> * multimedia playi
will always pick up the first alternative.
>
> Yes, I believe they will.
>
Has the list configuration changed? This is the second non-generated
mail I see arrived at -commits.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers
g of audio and video)
> * multimedia-pro-devel (depends on scripting and programming
>tools like PureData and CSound)
While I know that the tasks are not meant to be disjoint sets, I think
that this split has too much overlap. In particular, both csound and
puredata can be (and are freq
ined split?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
tors. No upstream release since
2007. Popcon ~= 700.
vkeybd: A virtual keyboard. No new upstream release. Popcon ~= 350
wavbreaker: Cuts a wav file into sections. No upstream release since
2008. I think we have alternative applications in debian. Popcon ~= 80.
I believe that if no one steps in t
hem
> - we hopefully get more potential and real contributors, ideally even
>new developers
>
>
> WDYT?
Every time I think about it, I like it more. I think we should do that.
And announce it to the world via d-d-a.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
ions how
> to implement that advice.
Well, ideally this would be fixed by dpkg-buildpackage, but for some
reason it has taken more than 5 years to get solved (#229357).
Hopefully, the proposed patch will get applied during the squeeze+1
release cycle.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
t know the codebase, so I don't
know if it is complete, though.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
bring gtkpod into the team. Any other
team members use gtkpod? I've not used it in a while, so that is why I
didn't answer to your previous email, to let other interested people
speak first.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintain
On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
>>> Subject, I think p
a!
Translation:
Dear Debian Community... Happy Birthday for thousands of good and new
birthdays making the Universal Operating System! Thanks for guaranteeing
our free[1] access to information and to the management of our culture!
[1] TN: As in freedom
--
Saludos,
ship the GPL text in the package. It seems
like no patch or file tries to read the license, so no need to ship it
(we already have the copyright file).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-ma
at's why i make all the fuzz about "-path" and "-lib"
>>
>
> I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an
> upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian.
I think I understand now, and I agree with Hans. That documentation
should go upstream, not in a debian readme.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
FileName[PATH_MAX + 1];
> ++char adtsFileName[PATH_MAX + 1];
I believe not all archs have PATH_MAX. I'm almost positive that hurd
doesn't have it.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Dear release team,
On 14/08/10 10:31, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 06/08/10 14:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Felipe Sateler (06/08/2010):
>>> I also just managed to build it on smetana. Looks like the buildd is
>>> borked.
>>>
>>> What should I do
the source (but not in binary
> packages) regarding "firefox" (shipped in Ubuntu but not Debian) using
> dpkg-vendor.
Note that there is a not so slight difference between Marillat's archive
and Ubuntu. Namely, that in this team we have people that work on both
debian and
(No need to CC me)
On 14/08/10 17:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
>>
On 14/08/10 11:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>> On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wro
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
>>> levels. I'd really love to
On 06/08/10 14:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Felipe Sateler (06/08/2010):
>> I also just managed to build it on smetana. Looks like the buildd is
>> borked.
>>
>> What should I do next?
>
> I guess I'm going to give it back again and again, until it builds…
ckages.
How does maintaining several API versions (compat levels) help
backporting? If the compat level you are using doesn't exist on current
stable (or other Ubuntu release), then you are as much out of luck as
without the compat levels. Or am I missing something?
--
S
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
>>> wouldn't dare do...
>>
>&
On 14/08/10 04:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:21:02 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:06:45PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01
, and
stable has 1.14.29.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
t knowing what
pd is).
For debian/copyright.. has motex really been untouched since 2001?
The example should go into /usr/share/doc/pd-motex/examples.
Similar to the discussion on pd-zexy, is something needed to use motex?
If so, you should document that in README.Debian.
--
Saludo
On 13/08/10 13:45, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 08:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> BTW, I have another issue: This mailing list recieves a lot of
>>> packaging related information which I
t because we
feared the traffic was so small we would dilute the interest. Perhaps
the time has come to rethink this?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.
re a doxygen-like tool for make? I think it could then be used to
generate reference docs from the sources (which is always easier than
keeping separate documentation).
(I'm thinking this subthread should go to another list...)
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
__
hen the user can choose which ones
to install, because there is no direct interface between tasks and apt.
In other words, I'm more interested in the display/marketing potential
of the web site than on the usefulness of tasksel-style tasks.
Also, they are maintained in the blends svn repository
htt
viding the same files with different functionality).
> hopefully this can be handled without excessive use of the "Conflicts:"
> tag...
>
> does this make sense?
It does. Howevert, then the README.Debian note is confusing. I thought
one needed to add that to use zexy, which is no
On 12/08/10 05:05, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-11 16:04, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> I have just added you to the team on alioth. Welcome!
>
> cool thank you.
>
>>
>> First import the packages in the team's git repository (and be sure to
>
to alioth. i would be thankful if someone
> could sponsor a package upload.
First import the packages in the team's git repository (and be sure to
enable the commit notifications to the pkg-multimedia-commits list).
Also, read our wiki page for some details regarding how we usually
hand
On 09/08/10 06:01, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:50:16AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> As seen on the documentation, there is already a DeMuDi blend. Maybe we
>> can start from there? DeMuDi people were part one of the 2 teams that
>> merged int
lusion in Squeeze.
The autoreconf patch is quite intrusive, I'm not sure the RT will accept
it. Anyhow, I'm building it now. You should contact the RT ASAP for a
freeze exception.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/08/10 13:46, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:11 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 05/08/10 23:51, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 20:52 -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>> Hi Hans-Cristoph,
>>>>
>
defined in the tasks
> files. I have a lot more ideas and hope some are useful for
> enterprise issues as well that I hope that some people of Debian
> Multimedia might bring in other ideas (ironed out in code ;-)).
Well, I'm sure that as we start using the blends infrastructure som
On 05/08/10 21:32, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 08:27:38PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Can you please retry on schroeder?
>>>
>>> Failed again (with -5):
>>>
>>> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?p
On 06/08/10 04:06, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 04.08.2010 09:32, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
>> Alright, I've tried this approach. Could you please check if it works
>> now?
>
> Ping.
>
Sorry, I forgot about this one. Building it now...
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
; - Jonas
>
> Some relevant bullet points ;)
> * I'm already on this list
> * I read thru the DebianMultimedia wiki
> * I'm eighthave-guest on alioth
I've just added you. Welcome to the team! You can start importing your
packages into git.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
rd. Csound used to build just fine. Looks like:
1. Scons is broken (unlikely to cause a glibc error, it's a pyhton
script), or
2. Python is broken, or
3. Host/kernel/libc are broken.
Sparc people, any ideas on how to proceed to debug this?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
the libraries start with "pd-"):
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged
>
> I am thinking the next step is to take one package all the way thru the
> mentors.debian.net process and get that all smoothed out, then work on
> the
On 05/08/10 14:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Felipe Sateler (05/08/2010):
>>>> Can you please retry on schroeder? -11 indicates a segmentation
>>>> fault, probably in scons, and spontini has shown various similar
>>>> crashes in different
On 05/08/10 13:51, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 05/08/10 13:40, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 11:27:01 (EDT), Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>
>>> Source: csound
>>> Version: 1:5.12.1~dfsg-4
>>> Severity: serious
>>> Justifica
urce.
I believe this has to be asked on debian-sp...@buildd.debian.org.
Dear buildd maintainers, could you retry csound on schroeder?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On 04/08/10 11:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:51:12AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 03/08/10 17:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
>>>> This doesn't seem to hel
On 03/08/10 17:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 17:31:05 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> This doesn't seem to help (I called dpkg-buildpackage -B and doxygen was
>> called). How will dh_listpackages know if we called dpkg-buildpackage -B?
>>
>
On 03/08/10 16:09, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 19:23:59 (EDT), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>> Copying this to the appropriate bug...
>>
On 03/08/10 01:58, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 02.08.2010 17:55, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> The pristine-tar branch has a gzipped file, yet debian/gbp.conf says
>> compression = bzip2. Which one is wrong?
>
> Argh. It seems I added the gbp.conf file just too late, i.
On 03/08/10 00:26, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 19:23:59 (EDT), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>> Copying this to the appropriate bug...
>>
On 02/08/10 18:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, August 1, 2010 12:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Copying this to the appropriate bug...
> [...]
>> Indeed. How do you suggest working through this? Facts:
>>
>> 1. The build hangs unpredictably on a doxygen call.
>
On 02/08/10 11:28, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 02/08/10 07:30, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I've brought libmatroska back into shape in our GIT repository. It is
>> currently targeted at experimental, because it needs libebml from there.
>> Al
7;ll take a look as soon as the GIT repository finishes downloading :p
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http:
he Silver
> Lining of the Cloud" by Eben Moglen on Wednesday.
>
> All in all, very promising stuff is going on!
Please share after the talk for us on the front side of the curtains :)
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Copying this to the appropriate bug...
On 01/08/10 11:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, July 30, 2010 19:02, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 30/07/10 13:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> - ardour: FTBFS on sparc (#590863)
>>> - csound: FTBFS on hppa (#590948)
>>
ack on virtual www-browser, and drop
> superfluous fallback on firefox.
The firefox fallback is useful on Ubuntu systems. As it is harmless in
debian, I suggest keeping it to avoid Ubuntu/Debian diffs.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: Open
e the necessary build deps, so I can't binNMU it myself.
slv2 hangs in a file copy operation, apparently. Adrian Knoth already
commented on the ardour bug. Should we schedule retries?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing
Hi people, I won't have internet access from the 22 to the 29th of July.
Feel free to do uploads of any of "my" packages should they require it.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
re_1.2-2.dsc
> midisport-firmware_1.2-2_all.deb
> to non-free/m/midisport-firmware/midisport-firmware_1.2-2_all.deb
And it did :)
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainer
me archives (content-wise).
Gah, I'll try again, with the tarball in the archive. I hope this makes
the upload go past the bogus key not found error. However, I think maybe
the pristine-tar data should be fixed to match what we have in the archive?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
signat
On 16/07/10 15:04, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:39:59PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>>>>Force regeneration of configure from configure.ac
>>>
>>>> +post-patches::
>>>> +autoreconf -fi
>>>
>>>
I object to the approach in sugar-toolkit-0.88. It is overly
complicated. I think making use of dpkg-source is better: just remove
the files on clean, and dpkg-source will ignore them. The kannel-sqlbox
approach is better: moving files out of the way pre-build and restore
them on clean (which is what
econf anyway, so I think there's no need to ship
>> modified copies of these two files via debian/patches (as done by
>> dpkg-source).
>>
>> If there's a way to suppress it, I'd like to know...
>
> I commented on this in a separate mail.
On 13/07/10 18:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 04:27:09PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> In csound, we build depend on default-jdk-builddep, which is wrong (as
>> per /usr/share/doc/java-common/README.gcj-native-transition). The
>> correct build depe
On 13/07/10 18:14, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Neither of those packages has been uploaded, so I'd say just trash them
>> and start afresh.
>>
>
> Felipe,
>
> zita-convolver is available in testi
ably we need to repack the tarball and play a bit with the
> versioning (I thought to release next package with something like
> 2.0.0+really2.0.0-1).
>
> Any suggestions?
Neither of those packages has been uploaded, so I'd say just trash them
and
we should be resolving against default-jdk, which is
what we do actually build-depend on.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailma
| \
grep Package: | uniq
Package: vlc
So the ABI issue is a non-issue, since nobody uses libvlc outside of vlc
itself.
But I do agree that the stable update process can be too strict.
Alternatives include backports or moving vlc to volatile (for debian at
least).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sate
801 - 900 of 1037 matches
Mail list logo
