On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:08:58PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Woo hoo, my first package in Debian, (hopefully)!
Congratulations!! :-)
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask be
On Aug 20, 2010, at 10:41 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
(No need to CC me)
On 20/08/10 22:35, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ready for uploading :)
Uploaded.
Woo hoo, my first package in Debian, (hopefully)!
.hc
(No need to CC me)
On 20/08/10 22:35, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Ready for uploading :)
Uploaded.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.
On Aug 20, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/08/10 21:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:0
On 19/08/10 21:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2010 08:01 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> That would make sense if the big tarball wasn't going to change. The
> problem is that upstream (me, mostly) is going to stop distributing a
> lot of these libraries in the big tarball. Also,
On Aug 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, R
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:49 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > Once pd-motex is in, I am thinking of running one more
> > thru individually, then once that's done, I'll submit the whole batch.
> > Does that work?
>
> I'm still not convinced that hav
On 19/08/10 13:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Once pd-motex is in, I am thinking of running one more
> thru individually, then once that's done, I'll submit the whole batch.
> Does that work?
I'm still not convinced that having one source package for all these
extensions is the best move (as
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 23:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> >On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:40:09 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> In this context, I think the above suggestion makes the most sense. So
> here's my plan:
>
> - make the LICENSE.txt file into a symlink, if GPL, BSD or other common
> license
> - make usr/share/doc/pd-motex/README.txt a syml
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:40:09PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt are
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format.
They are part of the library, and the
On 2010-08-17 17:39, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. They
this should read: "are part of a Pd lib
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:16:09PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. They
are part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the library
browser) looks for them to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 15:35:10 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> README.txt and LICENSE.txt are part of the Pd library format. They are
> part of the library, and the Help Browser (aka the library browser)
> looks for them to display them. The library format is basically a
> directory w
On Aug 17, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:37:11 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returnin
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:11:33AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, there is no need to ship the GPL text in the package. It seems
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:37:11 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
>>> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 00:22:25 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
>> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
>> feedback!
>
> How are you editing debia
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 01:03:57 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> How are you editing debian/changelog? The timestamp is old!
>
> Ah, oops, I forgot dch. I've been using emacs.
You might want to install the 'dpkg-dev-el' package, which features
debian-changelog-mode. Here, you can easil
On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
Subject, I think pd-m
On 16/08/10 19:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>>> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
>>> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all fo
On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
feedback!
How are you editing debian/changelog? The times
On 16/08/10 17:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> It seems that this thread gets easily hijacked ;) Returning to the
> Subject, I think pd-motex is ready for upload, thanks all for the
> feedback!
How are you editing debian/changelog? The timestamp is old!
Also, there is no need to ship the GP
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 14:30 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 16/08/10 14:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >> On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 20:50:50 (CEST), IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-16 20:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an
>> upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian.
>>
>
> sure, but right now i h
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:55:19PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2010-08-16 20:30, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an
upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not
Debian.
I think I understand now, and I agree with Ha
On 2010-08-16 20:30, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an
>> upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian.
>
> I think I understand now, and I agree with Hans. That documentation
> should go upstream, not in a debian rea
On 2010-08-16 20:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I don't see why this is Debian-specific though. It really is an
> upstream issue, this should be documented as part of zexy, not Debian.
>
sure, but right now i have my debian-maintainer hat on, and zexy does
not have a README.
if an appli
On 16/08/10 14:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be
able to use them right away, without having to
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be
> >> able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with special
> >> args. I'm getting the im
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:28:05PM -0400, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
Hello,
2010/8/12 Jonas Smedegaard :
2. Release a tarball (with debian subdir stripped)
I just wanted to stress out the fact that the debian directory need to
be out of the upstream tarball. (and repository) It took me a few
On 2010-08-16 03:31, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> I'm not a pd expert, but if I install some extensions, I expect to be
>> able to use them right away, without having to invoke pd with special
>> args. I'm getting the impression that we are not living up to that
>> expectation.
>
> You can
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 09:12 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 23:03:33 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> >> The example should go into /usr/share/doc/pd-motex/examples.
> >
> > The 'examples' folder is part of the standard library format for Pd
> > libraries, so it n
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 21:31 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> (No need to CC me)
>
> On 14/08/10 17:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Now that there is a separate thread on c
Hello,
2010/8/12 Jonas Smedegaard :
> 2. Release a tarball (with debian subdir stripped)
I just wanted to stress out the fact that the debian directory need to
be out of the upstream tarball. (and repository) It took me a few week
to get that part. Once it's done, packaging is a lot easier... :
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:16:26AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper main
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
What's an "ABI" level?
Sorry.
I shall do my best to never ever again use the term "ABI" except when I
really really mean it.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: htt
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 13:19:19 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:16:26AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Feli
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:16:26AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper main
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 02:23:59 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called comp
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 23:03:33 (CEST), Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> The example should go into /usr/share/doc/pd-motex/examples.
>
> The 'examples' folder is part of the standard library format for Pd
> libraries, so it needs to be in the library. A .pd file is something
> like a .svg or a
(No need to CC me)
On 14/08/10 17:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
>>> give me some feedback on my pd-mot
On 14/08/10 11:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Backporting a recent d
On 14/08/10 11:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
>>> levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And t
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 14:43 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> > Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
> > give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
> > I'm ready to fix whatever needs
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:19:23AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare d
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 16:19:27 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
>> levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And this very
>> strict commitment to stable interfaces
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:13:52PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:15:26 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:40:08 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
CDBS is more backports-friendly
On 14/08/10 06:13, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> debhelper maintains a history of very stable interfaces, called compat
> levels. I'd really love to see something similar to cdbs. And this very
> strict commitment to stable interfaces and semantics help a lot for
> backporting packages.
How does maint
On 14/08/10 05:40, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
>>> wouldn't dare do...
>>
>> While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs deba
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:37:36PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
I would like to chime in and say that with the packages I've worked on
(besides my own), I found that both dh and cdbs get whatever I need
done. I however prefer dh.
I suspect that you (like Benjamin) mean modern short-form debhelp
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 21:15:26 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
>> of that at debconf 10 ;-)
>
> The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it ne
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:42:28PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
wouldn't dare do...
While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine with either),
this statement is not true. d
On Friday 13 August 2010 15:15:26 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
> >of that at debconf 10 ;-)
>
> The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it new argument
On 13/08/10 15:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Backporting a recent debhelper requires backporting dpkg which I
> wouldn't dare do...
While I don't want to get in the dh/cdbs debate (I'm fine with either),
this statement is not true. debhelper requires dpkg-dev >= 1.14.19, and
stable has 1.14.29.
-
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:20:45PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
of that at debconf 10 ;-)
The best way to keep a thread alive(!) is to feed it new arguments, as
you do below.
I honestly tried to not do side-by-side co
On 13/08/10 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
> give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
> I'm ready to fix whatever needs fixing.
THe changelog mentions that it is a non-maintainer upload
Now that there is a separate thread on cdbs vs dh, perhaps someone could
give me some feedback on my pd-motex package which happens to use dh.
I'm ready to fix whatever needs fixing.
.hc
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:20 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing,
Aah, finally a new round of cdbs vs. dh bashing, we didn't have enough
of that at debconf 10 ;-)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:40:08 (CEST), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>>Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaar
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
[1] or agree to repackage using cdbs - I just won't you to get the
impression that I lured you into this: most people in the multimedia
team are fine with - yeah,
Am Donnerstag, den 12.08.2010, 23:38 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> [1] or agree to repackage using cdbs - I just won't you to get the
> impression that I lured you into this: most people in the multimedia
> team are fine with - yeah, even prefer - short-form dh, it is just me
> being obnoxio
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 03:26:03PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
I deleted pd-motex.git and I uploaded it again. My only question is
the debian version is cur
On Aug 12, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
Ok, I went with git-import-dsc since I've had these packages around
for a while in launchpad. The git-buildpackage tools are much
easier, I wish I'd seen that bef
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, I went with git-import-dsc since I've had these packages around for
a while in launchpad. The git-buildpackage tools are much easier, I
wish I'd seen that before :).
Yeah, I felt the same when I found git (compared t
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 19:44 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:26:41PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Ok, I uploaded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/12/2010 06:26 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Is git-import-orig preferred over git-import-dsc? I already have the
> whole source package.
with git-import-dsc you start from an already packaged deb, whereas with
git-import-orig you start wi
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:26:41PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>Ok, I uploaded my first package from the list of ITPs that I posted
>(pd-*). Once I get
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 12:11 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> >Ok, I uploaded my first package from the list of ITPs that I posted
> >(pd-*). Once I get this one thru the whole process, I'll fix whatever
> >needs fixing
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 04:40:54PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Ok, I uploaded my first package from the list of ITPs that I posted
(pd-*). Once I get this one thru the whole process, I'll fix whatever
needs fixing and upload the rest.
Then I'll remove the 'debian' folder from the u
72 matches
Mail list logo
