Chris Johnson wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
192.168.1.:allow,TCPREMOTEIP="unknown",TCPREMOTEHOST="unknown",RELAYCLIENT=""
Clever! ;-)
Invoke tcpserver with -lunknown and the received header will not
show the server's internal hostname, too.
To really clean up, see FAQ 5.5 and filter the message
+ Doug McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| I changed the character in conf-break to + and have no earthly idea
| how to make lists work at this point (or any submailboxes).
| user-list fails; user+list fails.
I use conf-break = '+' too, and have no problems with that. But
beware that the address
+ "Oden Eriksson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
|
| qmail-local.c: In function `main´:
| qmail-local.c:448 Warning: return type of `main´ is not `int´
|
|
| Is this severe and if so how do I correct it ?
It does not matter one whit because all these program exit via _exit()
and
Hi Oden,
If the exit program is always returning with _exit() then add int in front
of main.
i.e. int main ()
the reason you are getting this error is because the function is defined
to return nothing i.e. void main () thus you are telling the function to
return the exit code (conflict in
On Thu, Apr 22, 1999 at 09:38:51AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Blaine Lefler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my first message to the group. I was wondering if there is a
way to make qmail open a single qmail connection per domain not per
rcpt?
No.
Yes.
Put the domain in
On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 03:59:38AM -, Russell Nelson wrote:
Steve Berg writes:
If the ~alias user directory has a .qmail-default file pointing to a
mail address will qmail never generate a bounce message for no such
user?
You are correct.
I'd just have said 'Yes.', to keep it on
qmail Digest 28 Apr 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 624
Topics (messages 24786 through 24858):
qmail 14256 invoked by uid 0
24786 by: Harald Hanche-Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24789 by: Marlon Anthony Abao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24790 by: "Petr Novotny" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24794
Hi
I have installed the rpm package
"qmail-imap-4.5.beta-2.i386.rpm"
from ftp://ftp.engr.uark.edu/pub/qmail/qmail-imap/
on my redhat5.2 box, and qmail-1.03-7.i386.rpm also,
the later one was from
http://yoda.cs.ru.ac.za/qmail/summersoft.html.
then I test it with the Netscape
I am starting qmail during system startup in conjunction with
tcpwrappers. In the ps list is I guess because of this no running qmail
process to be found.
What is the proper method of stopping qmail in this case?
Thanks
Ralf
let me also note that i get this error on almost every platform i've
compiled qmail on, linux+glibc, freebsd2.6-3.1, solaris2.5-2.6,
linuxppc4.0, etc..
end
+-+
|Greg Albrecht KF4MKT [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|Safari Internetwww.safari.net|
|Fort
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 04:15:09PM +1000, Michael Mansour wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue where I installed the qmail rpm into my Redhat 5.2, all
installed well and is working.
However, my issue is when I try to use ".qmail-default" in the users
home directory to accept ALL addresses for his
Hello,
how can I find out which version of qmail is installed? I have to maintenance
a mailserver on which qmail is installed. But I'm realy confused, because the
manpages show me version 1.01 and the owner of the server told me that's a
qmamil version 1.03
Thanks in advance,
Heiko
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# ln -s /usr/bin /var/qmail
ln -s /usr/bin /var/qmail/bin, I suppose? :)
Same thing since /var/qmail is a directory. I'm lazy, so the shorter
one appeals to me.
-Dave
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 00:39:04 -0400, phate wrote:
I'm setting up a mailing list using Ezmlm-idx..
I've setup everything properly, but the problem is when the user sends a
message to subscribe, he's asked to reply to a cookie based
authentication system, problem is that in the reply-to header
Is there anyway to fudge procmail into writing things to a Maildir? I
would think that just giving each message a different name based on some
variable that could be captured would work. Is anyone doing anything like
this? Thanks, andy
--
Hi
Ok, let me make myself clear.
what I want to do is:
1.
setup a qmail and set the Maildir format as the default mailbox ( casue it's
safety over a NFS )
so creat a .qmail under, let's say ~man/ ie: ~man/.qmail and
in the ~man/.qmail I write ./Maildir/ and then I
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:23:47AM -0500, Andy Walden wrote:
Is there anyway to fudge procmail into writing things to a Maildir? I
would think that just giving each message a different name based on some
variable that could be captured would work. Is anyone doing anything like
this? Thanks,
On Apr 28 1999, Andy Walden wrote:
Is there anyway to fudge procmail into writing things to a Maildir? I
would think that just giving each message a different name based on some
variable that could be captured would work. Is anyone doing anything like
this? Thanks, andy
I use
On Apr 27 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
Like ... twenty-five minutes? Almost always that means that your
/var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger file is messed up. Check to make sure
that the ownership and permissions match the following:
prw--w--w- 1 qmails qmail 0 Apr 27 10:15 trigger
Dave Sill writes:
That's why I prefer to install qmail from the directions in
INSTALL. Sure, the rpm's make it easier to *install*, but, IMHO, they
make it harder to *maintain* since you don't know exactly what they
did.
Yes you do.
rpm -q -l -vv $PACKAGE
--
Sam
Pike wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 1999 at 01:38:12PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Before installing, do:
# mkdir /var/qmail /etc/qmail
# ln -s /etc/qmail /var/qmail/control
# mkdir /usr/doc/qmail
# ln -s /usr/doc/qmail /var/qmail/doc
# ln -s /usr/bin /var/qmail
ln -s /usr/bin /var/qmail/bin, I
"Sam" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's why I prefer to install qmail from the directions in
INSTALL. Sure, the rpm's make it easier to *install*, but, IMHO, they
make it harder to *maintain* since you don't know exactly what they
did.
Yes you do.
rpm -q -l -vv $PACKAGE
That only tells you
Text written by Guenthner, Ralf DIRZ 612 at 01:37 PM 4/28/99 +0200:
I am starting qmail during system startup in conjunction with
tcpwrappers. In the ps list is I guess because of this no running qmail
process to be found.
Have you tried a ps aux or a ps -ef, depending on your OS? Either way,
Hi
That was my original complaint ... the qmail rpm swoops itself all over
your fs symlinking every possible place where someone would possibly look
for it.
I haven't installed from RPM so I may be wrong, but surely there are only two
locations for each file, one in the FSSTND location and
Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:23:47AM -0500, Andy Walden wrote:
Is there anyway to fudge procmail into writing things to a
Maildir?
There are some patches available to make procmail deliver to
maildirs.
If you like procmail, and don't want to
I was just wondering if qmail will support putting users on 2 diffrent
servers. I would like to split the load between 2 diffrent machines. The
first doing the authentication and storage and the other as a storage. Is
this possible. Thanks
Hi,
Has anyone for fun taken a high-end machine and produced the type of
statistics that www.lsoft.com is presenting for lsmtp
(http://www.lsoft.com/lsmtp.html)? They are obviously geared towards
overestimation, but it would be useful for comparison. I realize that
qmail is currently limited to
* Qmail is probably also more inviting to hackers, just because it's more
human.
*grin*
Couldn't help it :-)
But he's right, don't fix what isn't broken.
-Yves
==
Remember Darwin; building a better mousetrap merely results
Hi
I wish I had read a mail like this before I started installing qmail on my
server,
which is exactly why I'm writing it. Call it frustration.
There may be a lot of unjust information in here! If you're seriously
reading this,
read all the replies too. I hope someone who _really_ knows qmail
On 28-Apr-99 Durham, Kenneth J wrote:
one other quick question. Were can i find a online documantation that can
get me through the setup of qmail from start to finish. Im kinda new so
please keep this in mind. I also want to setup pop and smtp thanks for all
your help.
There's a file
I don't see what this has to do with anything. Sendmail didn't come
with a pop3 program. You need checkpasswd only if you're going to use
qmail-pop3d. It's true that if you're going to continue to use
qpopper, as I have, you need to hack it a little to get ./Mailbox and
XTND XMIT working.
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=s9fJI615cBHmzTOP; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
At 09:38 PM Wednesday 4/28/99, Pike wrote:
Hi
I wish I had read a mail like this before I started installing qmail on my
server,
which is exactly why I'm writing it. Call it frustration.
Qmail claims it's a replacement for sendmail.
They say 'after installing, read the docs,there are some minor
I wrote:
# * Qmail is probably also more inviting to hackers, just because it's more
# human.
#I really doubt it. If you were a hacker, would you go after the SMTP
#daemon with a long, documented history of successful exploits, with
#exploit code available on the Web, or the one with no
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:38:57PM +0200, Pike wrote:
} Hi
}
} I wish I had read a mail like this before I started installing qmail on my
} server,
} which is exactly why I'm writing it. Call it frustration.
[snip]
} You even need to install things that are not in the package, which you have
}
Oop's, let's do it to the list as well.
--
\//
\\|// _\\|//_ | | _\\|//_ \\|//
(@ @) (' 0-0 ') (.) (.) (' @-@ ') (o-o)
On Wed 1999-04-28 (14:20), Fred Lindberg wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone for fun taken a high-end machine and produced the type of
statistics that www.lsoft.com is presenting for lsmtp
(http://www.lsoft.com/lsmtp.html)? They are obviously geared towards
overestimation, but it would be useful for
Hi
Thanks for the response
Note that there is no requirement for qmail to deliver to ~/Mailbox. You
can continue to deliver to /var/mail if you like; see /var/qmail/boot/binm*
or /var/qmail/boot/proc*. Interesting how only 2/10 of the sample boot
scripts deliver to ~/Mailbox and yet Pike
I got around this problem with my users by telling them that MDN is a
better read reciept technology. It provides a true read reciept. DSN is
just a delivery reciept. However, I understand that there are a lot of
e-mail clients which don't support both forms of read reciepts.
- eric
"Ferri
On Wed 1999-04-28 (20:31), Pike wrote:
Hi
That was my original complaint ... the qmail rpm swoops itself all over
your fs symlinking every possible place where someone would possibly look
for it.
I haven't installed from RPM so I may be wrong, but surely there are only two
locations
This time two of fellows answer me, thank you Eric and Dave for such speedy
answer.
Dave Sill wrote:
Apparently not. There aren't any MUA's that I'm aware of that do
anything special with DSN's. Dan considered DSN too cumbersome, so he
created his own easy-to-parse-but-also-human-readable
Eric Dahnke wrote:
I got around this problem with my users by telling them that MDN is a
better read reciept technology. It provides a true read reciept. DSN is
just a delivery reciept. However, I understand that there are a lot of
e-mail clients which don't support both forms of read
"Ferri Andy Ch." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted this DSN issue last week, and not a single response to
it. Is there any body care about this feature?
Apparently not. There aren't any MUA's that I'm aware of that do
anything special with DSN's. Dan considered DSN too cumbersome, so he
created
one other quick question. Were can i find a online documantation that can
get me through the setup of qmail from start to finish. Im kinda new so
please keep this in mind. I also want to setup pop and smtp thanks for all
your help.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL
well, a few comments:
1) sendmail does not come with a pop daemon, so throw anything about pop
out.
2) the only reason you may find it hard to deal with qmails new rules for
mailboxes and alias files is the fact that most major unix releases come
with sendmail preinstalled, so it seems that it
Dave Sill writes:
Migrating an entrenched sendmail system to qmail *is* complicated, and
shouldn't be attempted by someone who isn't familiar with both
sendmail and qmail. Hire an expert if you don't qualify.
Or come to my half-day qmail tutorial at the Linux Expo on May 19 in
Raleigh,
Hi there,
Thanks to everone about the "Warning: return type of `main´ is not
`int´" thing. I think I'll just wait until the final version of RH6 is out...,
I had some other mysterious things going on, so I reinstalled the
RH5.2 os today, no sweat. I'll keep the 2.2.6 kernel though.
--
Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Your response was great.
Sendmail, after all, was working fine.
Then why on Earth did you switch?
I was tempted by the crowdy hurrays everywhere
it sounded _very_ easy, which was misleading
and ...well ... it has been very educative as well
... forgot to say
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=+jhVVhN62yS6hEJ8; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Qmail claims it's a replacement for sendmail.
It is. It's just not a 100% compatible sendmail replacement. It
performs the same high-level functions, but almost all of the details
differ.
They say 'after installing, read the docs,there are some minor differences'
Hi
Thanks for the response
# First of all, consider these:
# * You have to deinstall sendmail before starting to install qmail.
this is completely untrue, the docs tell you to KEEP SENDMAIL RUNNING while
you install qmail
true ! thanks. I installed from an RPM - see Martin's mail.
# If all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there any filters like procmail available that can deliver to
mailboxes in maildir format? The most important purpose is to
redirect some mails, as from this list, for example, to appropriate
directories.
I posted one solution earlier today: safecat. It's a
# Should you install qmail ?
# ---
#
# First of all, consider these:
#
# * You have to deinstall sendmail before starting to install qmail. While
# installing
# qmail, you won't be able to do mail. Also, you will probably make quite some
# changes to your fs, which makes it hard to
From: Pike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:# First of all, consider these:
:# * You have to deinstall sendmail before starting to install qmail.
:this is completely untrue, the docs tell you to KEEP SENDMAIL RUNNING
while
:you install qmail
:
:true ! thanks. I installed from an RPM - see Martin's mail.
This
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Racer X wrote:
What I think is happening: qmail-local attempts to change to the root path,
and the chdir for THAT fails because the NFS mount is down. Around line 90
in qmail-local.c:
if (chdir(dir) == -1) { if (error_temp(errno)) _exit(1); _exit(2); }
I keep seeing stuff like this in my usernames and bounce messages.
starting delivery 275: msg 216123 to local ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
starting delivery 540: msg 216146 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
starting delivery 542: msg 216146 to local _{[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ideas?
--
# # First of all, consider these:
# # * You have to deinstall sendmail before starting to install qmail.
# this is completely untrue, the docs tell you to KEEP SENDMAIL RUNNING while
# you install qmail
#
# true ! thanks. I installed from an RPM - see Martin's mail.
As far as I know, installing
here is another bounce that I'm getting. i sent the orginal message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], This is what bounced back. All should work. Notice the
garbage characters. I'm getting like 50 of these a minute..
--
---
Andy Walden
| # Question is: can you sell qmail as a cool tool to a moron like
| # me who just popped a RedHat CD out of a box ? Because really,
| # this _is_ the way it's presented, at http://www.qmail.org
It goes without saying that "morons like you who just popped a RedHat CD
out of a box" have no
Pike wrote:
you should install on a test box before you attempt the real thing!
that is common sense
That would be a nice warning on the qmail homepage !
If that piece of advice comes as a surprise to you, then you deserve
every bit of trouble your users have given you.
You seem to have
this is completely untrue, the docs tell you to KEEP SENDMAIL RUNNING while
you install qmail
Yes, the docs say that, but when you try to install qmail (RPM's anyway) it
says it can't because sendmail is installed...yes installed not running. I
killed sendmail but it still wouldn't
On 28-Apr-99 Andy Walden wrote:
here is another bounce that I'm getting. i sent the orginal message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], This is what bounced back. All should work. Notice the
garbage characters. I'm getting like 50 of these a minute..
[snip]
-- Forwarded message
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 15:32:39 +0200, Heiko Romahn wrote:
Hello,
how can I find out which version of qmail is installed? I have to maintenance
a mailserver on which qmail is installed. But I'm realy confused, because the
manpages show me version 1.01 and the owner of the server told me that's a
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:38:57PM +0200, Pike wrote:
Should you install qmail ?
---
First of all, consider these:
* You have to deinstall sendmail before starting to install qmail. While
installing
qmail, you won't be able to do mail. Also, you will probably make quite
Hi,
First pardon me if my questions are wrong or stupid. We have been using
Qmail
for a few months now. Overall we are very happy with Qmail. Just
recently I installed
the qmailanalog to analyze qmail logs. Our average concurrency is around
10 from zoverall and it has been in the range of (3,
XxEDGExX writes:
Preferable an rpm for Red Hat Linux.
[root@ny SRPMS]# ls -l pine*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2852846 Mar 31 19:53
pine-4.10-1-maildir.src.rpm
This is my own RPM. No problems so far.
If anyone wants to put this up on the web, somewhere, I can E-mail it to
you, I
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 20:31:32 +0200, Pike wrote:
Overall conclusion: _don't_use_the_rpm_to_install_qmail_
At least, not my build, which was done by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry david.
Overall conclusion: If you can do it better and you care about it,
don't use rpm. If you can't do it better or you
sigh, after further testing i realized it was something else. yes, the
failover works fine if the mount isn't there. thanks for your help.
i do have one question tho - what happens to qmail-local processes that are
in the middle of delivery when the mount goes down? will they block until
the
Dave Sill writes:
Apparently not. There aren't any MUA's that I'm aware of that do
anything special with DSN's.
That's because MUAs are not supposed to do anything with DSNs at all.
Furthermore it would be rather difficult for them to do anything with DSNs,
given that DSNs are part of the
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:38:57PM +0200, Pike wrote:
They say 'after installing, read the docs,there are some minor differences'
:-) LOL! But beware. That's vaporware.
I'm sorry to be a bother, but can you reference the instructions to
install qmail prior to reading the documentation?
--
Pike writes:
* You have to deinstall sendmail before starting to install qmail. While
installing
qmail, you won't be able to do mail.
I won't be a part of this flamewar, except to say that at one point I had
both Qmail and sendmail running on the same box, without experiencing much
trouble.
Hi
I have question about using stunnel package with qmail.
has anyone done it?
My current config. is
qmail + tcpserver for smtp and pop3
would like to use SSL function for both using stunnel
any suggestion, sample, idea, scripts appriciated.
Oden Eriksson writes:
Hi there,
Thanks to everone about the "Warning: return type of `main´ is not
`int´" thing. I think I'll just wait until the final version of RH6 is out...,
I had some other mysterious things going on, so I reinstalled the
RH5.2 os today, no sweat. I'll keep the
Try man qmail:
This documentation describes version 1.03 of qmail. See
http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html for other
qmail-related software.
R.
Heiko Romahn wrote:
Hello,
how can I find out which version of qmail is installed? I have to maintenance
a mailserver on which
Hello All,
I have an interesting question, I am using .qmail to forward
a copy of a message received by a user on my linux box (qmail v1.03),
and I have the username@location and it works fine for a single
entry, now how can I send a message in this way:
Want to send a message to
Sam wrote:
Security is top priority in qmail, as far as I know, but
how come the nice security support feature like DSN is out of questions?
Very funny. Thanks for a good laugh. DSNs offer no security whatsoever.
My pleasure, that's is IMHO, and thank you for the credit.
No, it is
If you go to the authors FAQ you'll find that he STILL offers a $500US
reward for anyone that can find a security hole in qmail.
My 2c worth.
Michael.
-Original Message-
From: Pike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 29 April 1999 6:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Qmail is
If reading the RPM docs for the installation of qmail it tells you to:
rpm -e sendmail
To remove it entirely.
Michael.
-Original Message-
From: Robin Bowes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 29 April 1999 8:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Qmail is not a replacement
Hello everyone...
I am upgrading the hardware of my main mail server.
p166 - pII450 w/ RAID.
So I need a good method of moving over everyones maildir's, and I'm
assuming doing a rcp just wont work, since the filenames correspond to the
inode tables right?
I'm not sure how to use the serialmail
Does it make a difference when one puts a space between the user and
group symbols (-u -g) and the numbers when starting tcp server?
(For my examples, lets pretend that the
qmaild uid=123 and the nofiles gid=456)
In the document at:
http://qmail-docs.surfdirect.com.au/docs/qmail-antirelay.html
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 10:47:41PM +, Sam wrote:
Dave Sill writes:
Apparently not. There aren't any MUA's that I'm aware of that do
anything special with DSN's.
That's because MUAs are not supposed to do anything with DSNs at all.
Not true (in practice). User chooses "Delivery
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Adam H wrote:
So I need a good method of moving over everyones maildir's, and I'm
assuming doing a rcp just wont work, since the filenames correspond to the
inode tables right?
I'm not sure how to use the serialmail package, but I think that may work?
Uhm... I may be
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:38:57PM +0200, Pike wrote:
Qmail claims it's a replacement for sendmail.
They say 'after installing, read the docs,there are some minor differences'
:-) LOL! But beware. That's vaporware.
We use qmail for nearly two years now on all our systems.
We migrated from a
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 04:46:02PM -0700, Bill Parker wrote:
Want to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I also want joe (who is a valid user on the box) to forward received
mail to addresses [EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED] this be
accomplished w/o too much fuss via entries in
I have been using qmail for about 6 months now and I'm quite happy with it.
Recently, I changed from POP3 to IMAP, however, and now, when reading my
mail with MS Outlook, all the times are wrong. Outlook thinks the messages
are received GMT. I thought this was Outlook's problem, but the more I
Does anyone have an estimated street-date for this book?
I'm trying to cobble a Linux box at home, and would like to use Qmail,
but for some odd reason, I have not been quite able to get things working
as I would like them w/QM.
Probably what I get for using Red Hat and the RPM tech. :P
(This
I've had the identical problem with qmail and MS Outlook as an IMAP
client...would love to hear of a solution from somebody.
-Tupshin
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Pulsipher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 1999 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IMAP
Geordon VanTassle writes:
Does anyone have an estimated street-date for this book?
It'll be months yet. Production and distribution alone looks to take
two months. Just go ahead and ask questions on this list. The only
stupid questions are the ones in the FAQ (distributed as FAQ in
Brandon Pulsipher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have been using qmail for about 6 months now and I'm quite happy with
it. Recently, I changed from POP3 to IMAP, however, and now, when
reading my mail with MS Outlook, all the times are wrong. Outlook
thinks the messages are received GMT. I
Occasionally users are getting several copies of the same email periodically. We are
running qmail 1.03 on RedHat 5.2. Has anyone else had this expierience?
Regards,
Eric
P.S. I'm still digesting the many (wonderful) replies to the "Unique situation?"
thread and will report back what
Eric S. writes:
Occasionally users are getting several copies of the same email
periodically. We are running qmail 1.03 on RedHat 5.2. Has anyone
else had this expierience?
Just some users? Or all users?
What's in your /var/qmail/rc.d?
The last time I saw this problem, it was due to
Hi
Does anyone know any guide document to the qmail-imap-4.5.beta-2
BoLiang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: BoLiang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmail-imap guide
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 14:43:02 +0900
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know any guide document to the qmail-imap-4.5.beta-2
FYI: ftp://ftp.engr.uark.edu/pub/qmail/qmail-imap/
---Ryoji
Help a cow in need!
Brandon Pulsipher writes:
I have been using qmail for about 6 months now and I'm quite happy with it.
Recently, I changed from POP3 to IMAP, however, and now, when reading my
mail with MS Outlook, all the times are wrong. Outlook thinks the messages
are received GMT. I thought this was
94 matches
Mail list logo
